Search Results

Search found 14378 results on 576 pages for 'record count'.

Page 267/576 | < Previous Page | 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274  | Next Page >

  • Continuous Form, how to add/update records with external connection

    - by Mohgeroth
    EDIT After some more research I found that I cannot use a continuous form with an unbound form since it can only reference a single record at a time. Given that I've altered my question... I have a sample form that pulls out data to enter into a table as an intermediary. Initially the form is unbound and I open connections to two main recordsets. I set the listbox's recordset equal to one of them and the forms recordset equal to the other. The problem is that I cannot add records or update existing ones. Attempting to key into the fields does nothing almost as if the field was locked (Which it is not). Settings of the recordsets are OpenKeyset and LockPessimistic. Tables are not linked, they come from an outside access database seperate from this project and must remain that way. I am using an adodb connection to get the data. Could the separation of the data from the project be causing this? Sample Code from the Form Option Compare Database Option Explicit Private conn As CRobbers_Connections Private exception As CError_Trapping Private mClient_Translations As ADODB.Recordset Private mUnmatched_Clients As ADODB.Recordset Private mExcluded_Clients As ADODB.Recordset //Construction Private Sub Form_Open(Cancel As Integer) Set conn = New CRobbers_Connections Set exception = New CError_Trapping Set mClient_Translations = New ADODB.Recordset Set mUnmatched_Clients = New ADODB.Recordset Set mExcluded_Clients = New ADODB.Recordset mClient_Translations.Open "SELECT * FROM Client_Translation" _ , conn.RBRS_Conn, adOpenKeyset, adLockPessimistic mUnmatched_Clients.Open "SELECT DISTINCT(a.Client) as Client" _ & " FROM Master_Projections a " _ & " WHERE Client NOT IN ( " _ & " SELECT DISTINCT ClientID " _ & " FROM Client_Translation);" _ , conn.RBRS_Conn, adOpenKeyset, adLockPessimistic mExcluded_Clients.Open "SELECT * FROM Clients_Excluded" _ , conn.RBRS_Conn, adOpenKeyset, adLockPessimistic End Sub //Add new record to the client translations Private Sub cmdAddNew_Click() If lstUnconfirmed <> "" Then AddRecord End If End Sub Private Function AddRecord() With mClient_Translations .AddNew .Fields("ClientID") = Me.lstUnconfirmed .Fields("ClientAbbr") = Me.txtTmpShort .Fields("ClientName") = Me.txtTmpLong .Update End With UpdateRecords End Function Private Function UpdateRecords() Me.lstUnconfirmed.Requery End Function //Load events (After construction) Private Sub Form_Load() Set lstUnconfirmed.Recordset = mUnmatched_Clients //Link recordset into listbox Set Me.Recordset = mClient_Translations End Sub //Destruction method Private Sub Form_Close() Set conn = Nothing Set exception = Nothing Set lstUnconfirmed.Recordset = Nothing Set Me.Recordset = Nothing Set mUnmatched_Clients = Nothing Set mExcluded_Clients = Nothing Set mClient_Translations = Nothing End Sub

    Read the article

  • file upload with php

    - by Rajanikant shukla
    Hi every body I am uploading file with php every thing is fine but move_uploded_file is not working every variable displayed record and all permission for file is set function uploadfile($filename) { $filetype=$filename["type"]; $filename=$filename['name']; $filetempname=$filename['tmp_name']; if($filetype=="application/msword") { move_uploaded_file($filetempname,"resume/".$filename); } }

    Read the article

  • What sql server isolation level should I choose to prevent concurrent reads?

    - by Brian Bolton
    I have the following transaction: SQL inserts a 1 new record into a table called tbl_document SQL deletes all records matching a criteria in another table called tbl_attachment SQL inserts multiple records into the tbl_attachment Until this transaction finishes, I don't want others users to be aware of the (1) new records in tbl_document, (2) deleted records in tbl_attachment, and (3) modified records in tbl_attachment. Would Read Committed Isolation be the correct isolation level?

    Read the article

  • mem-leak freeing g_strdup

    - by Mike
    I'm trying to free g_strdup but I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong. Using valgrind --tool=memcheck --leak-check=yes ./a.out I keep getting: ==4506== 40 bytes in 10 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 2 of 9 ==4506== at 0x4024C1C: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195) ==4506== by 0x40782E3: g_malloc (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2200.3) ==4506== by 0x4090CA8: g_strdup (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2200.3) ==4506== by 0x8048722: add_inv (dup.c:26) ==4506== by 0x80487E6: main (dup.c:47) ==4506== 504 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 4 of 9 ==4506== at 0x4023E2E: memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:532) ==4506== by 0x4023E8B: posix_memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:660) ==4506== by 0x408D61D: ??? (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2200.3) ==4506== by 0x408E5AC: g_slice_alloc (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2200.3) ==4506== by 0x4061628: g_hash_table_new_full (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2200.3) ==4506== by 0x40616C7: g_hash_table_new (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2200.3) ==4506== by 0x8048795: main (dup.c:42) I've tried different ways to freed but no success so far. I'll appreciate any help. Thanks BTW: It compiles and runs fine. #include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <glib.h> #include <stdint.h> struct s { char *data; }; static GHashTable *hashtable1; static GHashTable *hashtable2; static void add_inv(GHashTable *table, const char *key) { gpointer old_value, old_key; gint value; if(g_hash_table_lookup_extended(table,key, &old_key, &old_value)){ value = GPOINTER_TO_INT(old_value); value = value + 2; /*g_free (old_key);*/ } else { value = 5; } g_hash_table_replace(table, g_strdup(key), GINT_TO_POINTER(value)); } static void print_hash_kv (gpointer key, gpointer value, gpointer user_data){ gchar *k = (gchar *) key; gchar *h = (gchar *) value; printf("%s: %d \n",k, h); } int main(int argc, char *argv[]){ struct s t; t.data = "bar"; int i,j; hashtable1 = g_hash_table_new(g_str_hash, g_str_equal); hashtable2 = g_hash_table_new(g_str_hash, g_str_equal); for(i=0;i<10;i++){ add_inv(hashtable1, t.data); add_inv(hashtable2, t.data); } /*free(t.data);*/ /*free(t.data);*/ g_hash_table_foreach (hashtable1, print_hash_kv, NULL); g_hash_table_foreach (hashtable2, print_hash_kv, NULL); g_hash_table_destroy(hashtable1); g_hash_table_destroy(hashtable2); return 0; }

    Read the article

  • asp.net mvc user control problem foreach loop

    - by mazhar
    Previous post <%@ Control Language="C#" Inherits="System.Web.Mvc.ViewUserControl" % <% MvcApplication1.Models.FeaturesRepository _model = new MvcApplication1.Models.FeaturesRepository(); % <% foreach (var md in _model.GetAllFeatures()) { % <%--<% if (md.int_ParentId == 0) { %--% <%= md.vcr_FeaturesName % <%--<% } %--% <% } % It is with reference to the previous post above.Is there something wrong with the foreach loop(The result is correct but it is displaying the series of Add,Add,Add,Add,Add,Add...,which is the last record of the getallfeatures.

    Read the article

  • Insert data into SQL server with best performance

    - by Incognito
    I have an application which intensively uses DB (SQL Server). As it must have high performance I would like to know the fastest way to insert record into DB.Fastest from the standpoint of execution time. What should I use ? As I know the fastest way is to create stored procedure and to call it from code (ADO.NET). Please let me know is there any better way or may be there are is some other practices to increase performance.

    Read the article

  • LINQ entity query performance

    - by Abdel Olakara
    Hi all, I have a silly question. I would like to know if there is performance deference in these two quries: var cObject = from cust in entities.Customer where cust.id == cid select cust; and var cObject = entities.Customer.First( c=> c.id == cid); My query return only one record as I am querying with the primary key. But do they make any difference?

    Read the article

  • Oracle query to select rows with unique code

    - by Jasim
    I have a table like this C1 C2 C3 Code 1 2 3 33 1 2 3 34 2 4 1 14 1 2 3 14 i want to select only those record whose code is appearing only in single row. ie, in this case rows with code 33 and 34.. as they appear only once in this table. How can i write a query for that

    Read the article

  • Live javascript debugging by recording function calls and parameters

    - by Jenko
    Is there a debugging system that allows me to record javascript function calls and their parameters as they occur? this would allow me to trace and debug applications in live/client situations without the performance hit due to manual logging. Edit: I'm not talking about manually calling functions using a 'console' window and viewing the results, or manually adding 'trace' or 'log' commands into my javascript. I need it to work with any running javascript.

    Read the article

  • How wrong is it to modify the SDP body of a SIP message?

    - by rusbi
    A requirement for the SIP PBX I created for my company was to record all calls passing through it. I solved it by forcing all SIP message to pass through the PBX and to modify the SDP body so the stream passes through it and gets recorded. It works well. I recently found out that this is not allowed. Is there any other way to implement call recording and how "wrong" is this in regard to the protocol?

    Read the article

  • Model a Zero or One to Many Relationship

    - by John
    How should I model a zero or one to a many relationship in the database? For example, a user record may or may not have a parent. So should my user table have a t_user.parent_id or should I have an associative table called t_user_hierarchy with the columns t_user_hierarchy.parent_id and t_user_hierarchy.user_id?

    Read the article

  • Giving GUID for data using NDBUnit

    - by jess
    I am using NDBUbit to load data from XML file.Right now,I am manually giving GUID for each record(our primary key for all tables is unique-identifier) in the xml file.But,I wonder if there is a better way to do this?

    Read the article

  • load domain specific content

    - by wayne
    Let's say I have an app sitting at myapp.com The app has clients or users that are situated here myapp.com/jonny myapp.com/sally I want to allow users to point their own domain to my server (A record) and load their specific content. No redirects or anything. jonnysapp.com -> myapp.com/jonny So somehow my server needs to detect where the request is coming from and set the client... correct?

    Read the article

  • Having issues with setting up Inbound Email in SP2010

    - by Bill Daugherty
    I am having issues with setting up the Inbound Email with SP 2010. I have enabled the settings in Central Admin for Inbound Email, set up an MX record, added the IP to my Exchange Server, then created a new doc-lib in SP and i am still not seeing the "Incoming e-mail settings" option under communications in the doc-lib setup screen. Can someone let me know what I may be doing wrong, or missing?

    Read the article

  • database text field databound to a checkbox

    - by Patrick
    I'd like the field to save as a 1 or 0 instead of 'True' or 'False' in the database and i cannot figure out how to do it without manually setting every property when the record is saved. I have to use this a lot in this project and a bit field is not an option. I would like to solve this issue by extending the CheckBox control if possible but i don't know how to change the binding fields value. Any help would be greatly appreciated!

    Read the article

  • What to name 2 methods with same signatures

    - by coffeeaddict
    Initially I had a method in our DL that would take in the object it's updating like so: internal void UpdateCash(Cash Cash) { using (OurCustomDbConnection conn = CreateConnection("UpdateCash")) { conn.CommandText = @"update Cash set captureID = @captureID, ac_code = @acCode, captureDate = @captureDate, errmsg = @errorMessage, isDebit = @isDebit, SourceInfoID = @sourceInfoID, PayPalTransactionInfoID = @payPalTransactionInfoID, CreditCardTransactionInfoID = @CreditCardTransactionInfoID where id = @cashID"; conn.AddParam("@captureID", cash.CaptureID); conn.AddParam("@acCode", cash.ActionCode); conn.AddParam("@captureDate", cash.CaptureDate); conn.AddParam("@errorMessage", cash.ErrorMessage); conn.AddParam("@isDebit", cyberCash.IsDebit); conn.AddParam("@PayPalTransactionInfoID", cash.PayPalTransactionInfoID); conn.AddParam("@CreditCardTransactionInfoID", cash.CreditCardTransactionInfoID); conn.AddParam("@sourceInfoID", cash.SourceInfoID); conn.AddParam("@cashID", cash.Id); conn.ExecuteNonQuery(); } } My boss felt that creating an object every time just to update one or two fields is overkill. But I had a couple places in code using this. He recommended using just UpdateCash and sending in the ID for CAsh and field I want to update. Well the problem is I have 2 places in code using my original method. And those 2 places are updating 2 completely different fields in the Cash table. Before I was just able to get the existing Cash record and shove it into a Cash object, then update the properties I wanted to be updated in the DB, then send back the cash object to my method above. I need some advice on what to do here. I have 2 methods and they have the same signature. I'm not quite sure what to rename these because both are updating 2 completely different fields in the Cash table: internal void UpdateCash(int cashID, int paypalCaptureID) { using (OurCustomDbConnection conn = CreateConnection("UpdateCash")) { conn.CommandText = @"update Cash set CaptureID = @paypalCaptureID where id = @cashID"; conn.AddParam("@captureID", paypalCaptureID); conn.ExecuteNonQuery(); } } internal void UpdateCash(int cashID, int PayPalTransactionInfoID) { using (OurCustomDbConnection conn = CreateConnection("UpdateCash")) { conn.CommandText = @"update Cash set PaymentSourceID = @PayPalTransactionInfoID where id = @cashID"; conn.AddParam("@PayPalTransactionInfoID", PayPalTransactionInfoID); conn.ExecuteNonQuery(); } } So I thought hmm, maybe change the names to these so that they are now unique and somewhat explain what field its updating: UpdateCashOrderID UpdateCashTransactionInfoID ok but that's not really very good names. And I can't go too generic, for example: UpdateCashTransaction(int cashID, paypalTransactionID) What if we have different types of transactionIDs that the cash record holds besides just the paypalTransactionInfoID? such as the creditCardInfoID? Then what? Transaction doesn't tell me what kind. And furthermore what if you're updating 2 fields so you have 2 params next to the cashID param: UpdateCashTransaction(int cashID, paypalTransactionID, someOtherFieldIWantToUpdate) see my frustration? what's the best way to handle this is my boss doesn't like my first route?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274  | Next Page >