Search Results

Search found 6532 results on 262 pages for 'computed columns'.

Page 27/262 | < Previous Page | 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34  | Next Page >

  • Sort wss3.0 view by more than 2 columns

    - by russellGove
    Does anyone know if it's possible to sort a sharepoint list view bymore than 3 columns. It doesn't let me do it in the UI and whwn I added this: > <Query> > <GroupBy Collapse="TRUE" GroupLimit="100"> > <FieldRef Name="Category" /> > <FieldRef Name="SubCategory" /> > <FieldRef Name="Topic" /> > </GroupBy> > <OrderBy> > <FieldRef Name="Category" /> > <FieldRef Name="SubCategory" /> > <FieldRef Name="Topic" /> > </OrderBy> > </Query> I get an error on the page: <!-- #RENDER FAILED -->

    Read the article

  • Is it a good idea to use a computed column as part of a primary key ?

    - by Brann
    I've got a table defined as : OrderID bigint NOT NULL, IDA varchar(50) NULL, IDB bigint NULL, [ ... 50 other non relevant columns ...] The natural primary key for this table would be (OrderID,IDA,IDB), but this it not possible because IDA and IDB can be null (they can both be null, but they are never both defined at the same time). Right now I've got a unique constraint on those 3 columns. Now, the thing is I need a primary key to enable transactional replication, and I'm faced with two choices : Create an identity column and use it as a primary key Create a non-null computed column C containing either IDA or IDB or '' if both columns were null, and use (OrderID,C) as my primary key. The second alternative seams cleaner as my PK would be meaningful, and is feasible (see msdn link), but since I've never seen this done anywhere, I was wondering if they were some cons to this approach.

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET DataList - defining "columns/rows" when repeating horizontal and using flow layout

    - by Ian Robinson
    Here is my DataList: <asp:DataList id="DataList" Visible="false" RepeatDirection="Horizontal" Width="100%" HorizontalAlign="Justify" RepeatLayout="Flow" runat="server"> [Contents Removed] </asp:DataList> This generates markup that has each item wrapped in a span. From there, I'd like to break each of these spans out into rows of three columns. Ideally I would like something like this: <div> <span>Item 1</span> <span>Item 2</span> <span>Item 3</span> </div> <div> <span>Item 4</span> <span>Item 5</span> <span>Item 6</span> </div> [etc] The closest I can get to this is to set RepeatColumns to "3" and then a <br> is inserted after every three items in the DataList. <span>Item 1</span> <span>Item 2</span> <span>Item 3</span> <br> <span>Item 4</span> <span>Item 5</span> <span>Item 6</span> <br> This gets me kind of close, but really doesn't do the trick - I still can't control the layout the way I'd like to be able to. Can anyone suggest a way to make this better? If I could implement the above example - that would be perfect, however I'd accept a less elegant solution as well - as long as its more flexible than <br> (such as inserting a <span class="clear"></span> instead of <br>).

    Read the article

  • Align 2 columns of text links

    - by andu
    Hi , I have this code in my block and i would like to have the two columns left and right . Now the 2-nd one is under the first column . <style type="text/css"> a img{border:none;} #planninglaunchbox { background:#f3f8e7; color:#1f1f1f; font:normal 11px Arial,sans-serif; margin:0 10px 10px 0; overflow:hidden; width:235px; } #planninglaunchbox .inner { padding:10px 0 10px 10px; } #planninglaunchbox a{color:#1f1f1f;text-decoration:none;} #planninglaunchbox a:active, #planninglaunchbox a:hover{text-decoration:underline;color:#579BC3;} #planninglaunchbox h3 { color:#1f1f1f; font:normal 12px Georgia,serif; margin:0 0 5px; text-transform:lowercase; width:215px; } #planninglaunchbox h4 { font:bold 12px Arial,sans-serif; margin:0 0 10px; } #planninglaunchbox ul { list-style:none; margin:0 0 5px; padding:0; } #planninglaunchbox ul.first{margin-right:10px;} #planninglaunchbox ul.first, #planninglaunchbox ul.last { float:left; } #planninglaunchbox ul li { background:none; margin-bottom:5px; padding:0; } #planninglaunchbox ul li img { margin-right:6px; vertical-align:middle; } #planninglaunchbox .seeall { clear:both; margin:0; padding:0; width:auto; } </style> <div id="planninglaunchbox"> <div class="inner"> <h3> Theme</h3> <ul class="first"> !--Some links-- </ul> <ul class="last"> !--Some links-- </ul> </div> </div>

    Read the article

  • CSS: Labels in table columns

    - by hello
    Hello. BACKGROUND: I would like to have small labels in columns of a table. I'm using some implemented parts of HTML5/CSS3 in my project, and this section specifically is for mobile devices. While both facts are not necessarily relevant, the bottom line is that I don't have to support Internet Explorer or even Firefox for that matter (just WebKit). THE PROBLEM With my current CSS approach, the vertical padding of the cell comes from the <span element (set to display: block with top/bottom margins), which contains the "value" of the column. As a result there's no padding when the <span> is empty or missing (no value) and the label is not in place. The "full" coulmns should give you the idea of where I want the labels to be, even if there's no value, and the <span> is not there. I realize that I could use "non-breaking-space", but I would really like to avoid it. I wonder if any of you have a fix / better way to do this? current code is below. Thank you for any help. <!DOCTYPE html> <html lang="en"> <head> <title>ah</title> <style> body { width: 320px; } /* TABLE */ table { width: 100%; border-collapse: collapse; font-family: arial; } th, td { border: 1px solid #ccc; border-width: 0px 0px 1px 1px; } th:last-child, td:last-child { border-right-width: 1px; } tr:first-child th { border-top-width: 1px; background: #efefef; } /* RELEVANT STUFF */ td { padding: 3px; } td sup { display: block; } td span { display: block; margin: 3px 0px; text-align: center; } </style> </head> <body> <table> <tr> <th colspan="3">something</th> </tr> <tr> <td><sup>some label</sup><span>any content</span></td> <td><sup>some label</sup><span>any content</span></td> <td><sup>some label</sup><span></span></td><!-- No content, just a label --> </tr> </table> </body> </html>

    Read the article

  • Cannot update any cells in datagrid in vb6

    - by Hybrid SyntaX
    Hello I'm trying to update a row in datagrid but the problem is that i can't even change its cell values I had set my datagrid AllowUpdate property to true , but i can't still change any cell values Option Explicit Dim conn As New ADODB.Connection Dim cmd As New ADODB.Command Dim recordset As New ADODB.recordset Public Action As String Public Person_Id As Integer Public Selected_Person_Id As Integer Public Phone_Type As String Public Sub InitializeConnection() Dim str As String str = _ "Provider=Microsoft.Jet.OLEDB.4.0;" & _ "Data Source=" + App.Path + "\phonebook.mdb;" & _ "Persist Security Info=False" conn.CursorLocation = adUseClient If conn.state = 0 Then conn.ConnectionString = str conn.Open (conn.ConnectionString) End If End Sub Public Sub AbandonConnection() If conn.state <> 0 Then conn.Close End If End Sub Public Sub Persons_Read() Dim qry_all As String ' qry_all = "select * from person,web,phone Where web.personid = person.id And phone.personid = person.id" qry_all = "SELECT * FROM person order by id" Call InitializeConnection cmd.CommandText = qry_all cmd.CommandType = adCmdText Set cmd.ActiveConnection = conn If conn.state = 1 Then Set recordset = cmd.Execute() End If BindDatagrid End Sub Private Function Person_Delete(id As Integer) Dim qry_all As String qry_all = "Delete * from person where person.id= " & id & " " Call InitializeConnection cmd.CommandText = qry_all cmd.CommandType = adCmdText Set cmd.ActiveConnection = conn If conn.state = 1 Then Set recordset = cmd.Execute() End If dg_Persons.Refresh End Function Private Function Person_Update() End Function Public Sub BindDatagrid() Set Me.dg_Persons.DataSource = recordset Me.dg_Persons.Refresh dg_Persons.Columns(0).Visible = False dg_Persons.Columns(4).Visible = False dg_Persons.Columns(1).Caption = "Name" dg_Persons.Columns(2).Caption = "Family" dg_Persons.Columns(3).Caption = "Nickname" dg_Persons.Columns(5).Caption = "Title" dg_Persons.Columns(6).Caption = "Job" End Sub Public Function DatagridReferesh() Call Me.Persons_Read End Function Private Sub cmd_Add_Click() frm_Person_Add.Caption = "Add a new person" frm_Person_Add.Show End Sub Private Sub cmd_Business_Click() ' frm_Phone.Caption = "Business Phones" frm_Phone.Phone_Type = "Business" frm_Phone.Person_Id = Selected_Person_Id frm_Phone.Tag = Selected_Person_Id frm_Phone.Show End Sub Private Sub cmd_Delete_Click() Dim msg_input As Integer msg_input = MsgBox("Are you sure you want to delete this person ?", vbYesNo) If msg_input = vbYes Then Person_Delete Selected_Person_Id MsgBox ("The person is deleted") frm_Phone.DatagridReferesh End If End Sub Private Sub cmd_Home_Click() 'frm_Phone.Caption = "Home Phones" frm_Phone.Phone_Type = "Home" frm_Phone.Person_Id = Selected_Person_Id frm_Phone.Tag = Selected_Person_Id frm_Phone.Show End Sub Private Sub cmd_Update_Click() If Not Selected_Person_Id = 0 Then frm_Person_Edit.Person_Id = Selected_Person_Id frm_Person_Edit.Show Else MsgBox "No person is selected" End If End Sub Public Function AddParam(name As String, param As Variant, paramType As DataTypeEnum) As ADODB.Parameter If param = "" Or param = Null Then param = " " End If Dim objParam As New ADODB.Parameter Set objParam = cmd.CreateParameter(name, paramType, adParamInput, Len(param), param) objParam.Value = Trim(param) Set AddParam = objParam End Function Private Sub Command1_Click() DatagridReferesh End Sub Private Sub Command2_Click() frm_Internet.Person_Id = Selected_Person_Id frm_Internet.Show End Sub Private Sub dg_Persons_BeforeColEdit(ByVal ColIndex As Integer, ByVal KeyAscii As Integer, Cancel As Integer) ' MsgBox ColIndex ' dg_Persons.Columns(ColIndex).Text = "S" ' dg_Persons.Columns(ColIndex).Locked = False ' dg_Persons.Columns(ColIndex).Text = "" 'dg_Persons.Columns(ColIndex).Value = "" 'Person_Edit dg_Persons.Columns(0).Value, dg_Persons.Columns(1).Value, dg_Persons.Columns(2).Value,dg_Persons.Columns(3).Value,dg_Persons.Columns(4).Value, dg_Persons.Columns(5).Value End Sub Private Sub dg_Persons_BeforeColUpdate(ByVal ColIndex As Integer, OldValue As Variant, Cancel As Integer) MsgBox ColIndex End Sub Private Sub dg_Persons_Click() If dg_Persons.Row <> -1 Then dg_Persons.SelBookmarks.Add Me.dg_Persons.RowBookmark(dg_Persons.Row) Selected_Person_Id = Val(dg_Persons.Columns(0).Value) End If End Sub Private Sub Form_Load() ' dg_Persons.AllowUpdate = True ' dg_Persons.EditActive = True Call Persons_Read dg_Persons.AllowAddNew = True dg_Persons.Columns(2).Locked = False End Sub Private Function Person_Edit(id As Integer, name As String, family As String, nickname As String, title As String, job As String) InitializeConnection cmd.CommandText = "Update person set name=@name , family=@family , nickname=@nickname , title =@title , job=@job where id= " & id & "" cmd.Parameters.Append AddParam("name", name, adVarChar) cmd.Parameters.Append AddParam("family", family, adVarChar) cmd.Parameters.Append AddParam("nickname", nickname, adVarChar) cmd.Parameters.Append AddParam("title", title, adVarChar) cmd.Parameters.Append AddParam("job", job, adVarChar) cmd.ActiveConnection = conn cmd.CommandType = adCmdText cmd.Execute End Function Private Function Person_Search(q As String) Dim qry_all As String qry_all = "SELECT * FROM person where person.name like '%" & q & "%' or person.family like '%" & q & "%' or person.nickname like '%" & q & "%'" Call InitializeConnection cmd.CommandText = qry_all cmd.CommandType = adCmdText Set cmd.ActiveConnection = conn If conn.state = 1 Then Set recordset = cmd.Execute() End If BindDatagrid End Function Private Sub mnu_About_Click() frm_About.Show End Sub Private Sub submnu_exit_Click() End End Sub Private Sub txt_Search_Change() Person_Search txt_Search.Text End Sub Thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • Fluent NHibernate: mapping complex many-to-many (with additional columns) and setting fetch

    - by HackedByChinese
    I need a Fluent NHibernate mapping that will fulfill the following (if nothing else, I'll also take the appropriate NHibernate XML mapping and reverse engineer it). DETAILS I have a many-to-many relationship between two entities: Parent and Child. That is accomplished by an additional table to store the identities of the Parent and Child. However, I also need to define two additional columns on that mapping that provide more information about the relationship. This is roughly how I've defined my types, at least the relevant parts (where Entity is some base type that provides an Id property and checks for equivalence based on that Id): public class Parent : Entity { public virtual IList<ParentChildRelationship> Children { get; protected set; } public virtual void AddChildRelationship(Child child, int customerId) { var relationship = new ParentChildRelationship { CustomerId = customerId, Parent = this, Child = child }; if (Children == null) Children = new List<ParentChildRelationship>(); if (Children.Contains(relationship)) return; relationship.Sequence = Children.Count; Children.Add(relationship); } } public class Child : Entity { // child doesn't care about its relationships } public class ParentChildRelationship { public int CustomerId { get; set; } public Parent Parent { get; set; } public Child Child { get; set; } public int Sequence { get; set; } public override bool Equals(object obj) { if (ReferenceEquals(null, obj)) return false; if (ReferenceEquals(this, obj)) return true; var other = obj as ParentChildRelationship; if (return other == null) return false; return (CustomerId == other.CustomerId && Parent == other.Parent && Child == other.Child); } public override int GetHashCode() { unchecked { int result = CustomerId; result = Parent == null ? 0 : (result*397) ^ Parent.GetHashCode(); result = Child == null ? 0 : (result*397) ^ Child.GetHashCode(); return result; } } } The tables in the database look approximately like (assume primary/foreign keys and forgive syntax): create table Parent ( id int identity(1,1) not null ) create table Child ( id int identity(1,1) not null ) create table ParentChildRelationship ( customerId int not null, parent_id int not null, child_id int not null, sequence int not null ) I'm OK with Parent.Children being a lazy loaded property. However, the ParentChildRelationship should eager load ParentChildRelationship.Child. Furthermore, I want to use a Join when I eager load. The SQL, when accessing Parent.Children, NHibernate should generate an equivalent query to: SELECT * FROM ParentChildRelationship rel LEFT OUTER JOIN Child ch ON rel.child_id = ch.id WHERE parent_id = ? OK, so to do that I have mappings that look like this: ParentMap : ClassMap<Parent> { public ParentMap() { Table("Parent"); Id(c => c.Id).GeneratedBy.Identity(); HasMany(c => c.Children).KeyColumn("parent_id"); } } ChildMap : ClassMap<Child> { public ChildMap() { Table("Child"); Id(c => c.Id).GeneratedBy.Identity(); } } ParentChildRelationshipMap : ClassMap<ParentChildRelationship> { public ParentChildRelationshipMap() { Table("ParentChildRelationship"); CompositeId() .KeyProperty(c => c.CustomerId, "customerId") .KeyReference(c => c.Parent, "parent_id") .KeyReference(c => c.Child, "child_id"); Map(c => c.Sequence).Not.Nullable(); } } So, in my test if i try to get myParentRepo.Get(1).Children, it does in fact get me all the relationships and, as I access them from the relationship, the Child objects (for example, I can grab them all by doing parent.Children.Select(r => r.Child).ToList()). However, the SQL that NHibernate is generating is inefficient. When I access parent.Children, NHIbernate does a SELECT * FROM ParentChildRelationship WHERE parent_id = 1 and then a SELECT * FROM Child WHERE id = ? for each child in each relationship. I understand why NHibernate is doing this, but I can't figure out how to set up the mapping to make NHibernate query the way I mentioned above.

    Read the article

  • Coloring even heighten columns

    - by verror
    I try to set different a background colors for left and right columns and to maintain the same height. So I set a background color for outer wrapper ("container" div) so it will set a color to rightBar. But this didn't work. Online Demo I want it to work on all browsers. Markup: <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd"> <html lang="en"> <head> <title>Test</title> </head> <body> <div class="contentcontainer"> <div class="container"> <div class="mainBar"> <p>Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text </p> <p>Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text </p> <p>Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text </p> <p>Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text </p> <p>Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text </p> <p>Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text </p> <p>Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text </p> <p>Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text </p> <p>Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text </p> <p>Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text </p> <p>Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text </p> <p>Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text </p> <p>Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text </p> <p>Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text </p> <p>Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text </p> <p>Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text </p> <p>Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text </p> <p>Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text </p> <p>Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text </p> <p>Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text </p> <p>Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text </p> <p>Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text </p> <p>Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text </p> <p>Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text </p> </div> <div class="rightBar"> <p>BAR Text BAR Text BAR Text</p> <p>BAR Text BAR Text BAR Text</p> <p>BAR Text BAR Text BAR Text</p> <p>BAR Text BAR Text BAR Text</p> <p>BAR Text BAR Text BAR Text</p> <p>BAR Text BAR Text BAR Text</p> <p>BAR Text BAR Text BAR Text</p> <p>BAR Text BAR Text BAR Text</p> <p>BAR Text BAR Text BAR Text</p> <p>BAR Text BAR Text BAR Text</p> </div> </div> </div> </body> </html> CSS: body { font-family: Verdana,Tahoma,Arial, "Trebuchet MS" ,Sans-Serif,Georgia,Courier, "Times New Roman" ,Serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background: repeat-x scroll center bottom #C4DAE9; text-align:center; } .contentcontainer { } .container { margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; margin-top:5px; width: 99%; text-align: left; background-color:Gray; clear:both; } .mainBar { width:70%; float:left; background-color:White; } .rightBar { width:30%; float:left; }

    Read the article

  • Windows Vista will not boot; the file header checksum does not match the computed checksum

    - by Magnus
    Right out of the blue, my wife's Sony Vaio stopped booting. This, not so fun, error message displays immediately after POST: The system cannot boot. The file is possibly corrupt. The file header checksum does not match the computed checksum The repair option on the Vista DVD says everything is fine and dandy, it couldn't be more happier or more clueless... Any ideas? Update: CHKDSK reports no issues. CHKDSK /r reports no issues. (Heck, both Windows Repair and CHKDSK could just as well tell me that I have won on lottery or that the earth is flat... ) Some have reported that a mem diagnostic could help, but for me the mem diag has just ran through 5 passes. It doesn't seem to help. According to Sony, pressing F10 should bring up the restore menu, but it doesn't, the error pops up straight after Bios POST. It seems that this error is first in line of all options at this point, and is doesn't put a smile on my face. I have attached an external USB drive and copied all user data/documents to it. I feel an OS re-install is around the corner.

    Read the article

  • How can I get columns name from select query in php?

    - by Farshad Mehrvarzan
    I want to execute a SELECT query but I don't how many columns to select. Like: select name, family from persons; How can I know which columns to select? "I am currently designing a site for the execute query by users. So when the user executes this query, I won't know which columns selected. But when I want to show the results and draw a table for the user I should know which columns selected."

    Read the article

  • SQL: Is there a more efficient way to calculate elapsed hours, minutes, seconds?

    - by hamlin11
    I'm using Computed Columns to provide me with the following information: Hours, Minutes, and Seconds between a Start DateTime and Finish DateTime (Where Minutes and Seconds are between 0 and 59 and Hours can be any value 0 or greater) Computed Column for Seconds: datediff(second,[Start],[Finish]) % 60 Computed Column for Minutes: floor(datediff(second,[Start],[Finish]) / 60.0) % 60 Computed Column for Hours: floor(datediff(second,[Start],[Finish]) / 3600.0) Here's the table for reference Note: I'm also calculating TotalElapsedSeconds, TotalElapsedMinutes, and TotalElapsedHours in other computed columns, but those are easy. I just feel like I might be missing out on a nice built in function in SQL.

    Read the article

  • Linq to Datarow, Select multiple columns as distinct?

    - by Beta033
    basically i'm trying to reproduce the following mssql query as LINQ SELECT DISTINCT [TABLENAME], [COLUMNNAME] FROM [DATATABLE] the closest i've got is Dim query = (From row As DataRow In ds.Tables("DATATABLE").Rows _ Select row("COLUMNNAME") ,row("TABLENAME").Distinct when i do the above i get the error Range variable name can be inferred only from a simple or qualified name with no arguments. i was sort of expecting it to return a collection that i could then iterate through and perform actions for each entry. maybe a datarow collection? As a complete LINQ newb, i'm not sure what i'm missing. i've tried variations on Select new with { row("COLUMNNAME") ,row("TABLENAME")} and get: Anonymous type member name can be inferred only from a simple or qualified name with no arguments. Also, does anyone know of any good books/resources to get fluent?

    Read the article

  • WPF Binding to DataRow Columns

    - by Trindaz
    Hi, I've taken some sample code from http://sweux.com/blogs/smoura/index.php/wpf/2009/06/15/wpf-toolkit-datagrid-part-iv-templatecolumns-and-row-grouping/ that provides grouping of data in a WPF DataGrid. I'm modifying the example to use a DataTable instead of a Collection of entities. My problem is in translating a binding declaration {Binding Parent.IsExpanded}, which works fine where Parent is a reference to an entity that has the IsExpanded attribute, to something that will work for my weakly typed DataTable, where Parent is the name of a column and references another DataRow in the same DataTable. I've tried declarations like {Binding Parent.Items[IsExpanded]} and {Binding Parent("IsExpanded")} but none of these seem to work. How can I create a binding to the IsExpanded column of the DataRow Parent in my DataTable? Thanks in advance, Dave

    Read the article

  • CSS issue with elements spanning columns

    - by bigFoot
    Hi folks. Overview: I'm trying to create a relatively simple page layout detailed below and running into problems no matter how I try to approach it. Concept: - A standard-size-block layout. I'll quote unit widths: each content block is 240px square with 5px of margin around it. - A left column of fixed width of 1 unit (245px - 1 block + margin to left). No problems here. - A right column of variable width to fill the remaining space. No problems here either. - In the left column, a number of 1unit x 1unit blocks fixed down the column. Also some blank space at the top - again, not a problem. - In the right column: a number of free-floating blocks of standard unit-sizes which float around and fill the space given to them by the browser window. No problems here. - Lastly, a single element, 2 units wide, which sits half in the left column and half in the right column, and which the blocks in the right column still float around. Here be dragons. Please see here for a diagram: http://is.gd/bPUGI Problem: No matter how I approach this, it goes wrong. Below is code for my existing attempt at a solution. My current problem is that the 1x1 blocks on the right do not respect the 2x1 block, and as a result half of the 2x1 block is overwritten by a 1x1 block in the right-hand column. I'm aware that this is almost certainly an issue with position: absolute taking things out of flow. However, can't really find a way round that which doesn't just throw up another problem instead. Code: <html> <head> <title>wat</title> <style type="text/css"> body { background: #ccc; color: #000; padding: 0px 5px 5px 0px; margin: 0px; } #leftcol { width: 245px; margin-top: 490px; position: absolute; } #rightcol { left: 245px; position: absolute; } #bigblock { float: left; position: relative; margin-top: -240px; background: red; } .cblock { margin: 5px 0px 0px 5px; float: left; overflow: hidden; display: block; background: #fff; } .w1 { width: 240px; } .w2 { width: 485px; } .l1 { height: 240px; } </head> <body> <div class="cblock w2 l1" id="bigblock"> <h1>DRAGONS</h1> <p>Here be they</p> </div> <div id="leftcol"> <div class="cblock w1 l1"> <h1>Left 1</h1> <p>1x1 block</p> </div> </div> <div id="rightcol"> <div class="cblock w1 l1"> <h1>Right 1</h1> <p>1x1 block</p> </div> <div class="cblock w1 l1"> <h1>Right 2</h1> <p>1x1 block</p> </div> <div class="cblock w1 l1"> <h1>Right 3</h1> <p>1x1 block</p> </div> <div class="cblock w1 l1"> <h1>Right 4</h1> <p>1x1 block</p> </div> <div class="cblock w1 l1"> <h1>Right 5</h1> <p>1x1 block</p> </div> <div class="cblock w1 l1"> <h1>Right 6</h1> <p>1x1 block</p> </div> <div class="cblock w1 l1"> <h1>Right 7</h1> <p>1x1 block</p> </div> </div> </body> </html> Constraints: One final note that I need cross-browser compatibility, though I'm more than happy to enforce this with JS if necessary. That said, if a CSS-only solution exists, I'd be extremely happy. Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • android: tablerow mixed with columns and multiline text

    - by Yang
    I am trying to have a tablelayout contains several tablerows. One of the rows contains 4 buttons, while the second row contains a very long text. However, the width of the button stretches with the text in the second row. Is there anyway to prevent this? http://img684.imageshack.us/i/tableview1.jpg/ http://img521.imageshack.us/i/tableview2.jpg/ Here is my xml file: (somehow this website is not friendly to xml file) AbsoluteLayout android:id="@+id/widget0" android:layout_width="fill_parent" android:layout_height="fill_parent" xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android" TableLayout android:id="@+id/widget28" android:layout_width="fill_parent" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:orientation="vertical" android:layout_x="0px" android:layout_y="10px" TableRow android:id="@+id/widget29" android:layout_width="fill_parent" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:orientation="horizontal" Button android:id="@+id/widget30" android:layout_width="wrap_content" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:text="Button" Button android:id="@+id/widget31" android:layout_width="wrap_content" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:text="Button" Button android:id="@+id/widget32" android:layout_width="wrap_content" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:text="Button" Button android:id="@+id/widget33" android:layout_width="wrap_content" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:text="Button" TableRow android:id="@+id/widget35" android:layout_width="fill_parent" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:orientation="horizontal" TextView android:id="@+id/widget40" android:layout_width="wrap_content" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:text="TextViewTextViewTextViewTextViewTextViewTextView"

    Read the article

  • SQL Reporting Services - Subreports Broken into multiple columns

    - by devin
    Hi, I inherited an SQL Reporting Services .rdl project from somebody and need help fixing some functionality. In each row of the report, there is a subreport. In order to save space the subreport is divided into 3. Such that in each row of the report, it splits the data of the subreport into 3 smaller tables. Right now, it fills these 3 subreports horizontally. (ie. if the result has 9 values, the first subtable will have 1, 4 & 7, the second subtable will have 2, 5 & 8, etc) Is there a way to have it fill the subtables vertically? (ie. the first subtable would have 1,2 & 3) Thanks!

    Read the article

  • CSS layout with 2 columns, taking up all width of browser, where left column can collapse

    - by Matt Dawdy
    I want to have a 2 column layout, and have the left column able to be 200 px at first, and have a "shrink" button to shrink it down to 10px, and have the right column expand to fill all the rest of the available space. Then if they click on the "show" button (which will be all they see in the now 10px wide left column) have the left grow back to 200px and have the right column shrink by that amount. I can't figure out how to make the right column grown and shrink without knowing the exact width of the window. I hope this makes sense, and I really hope someone can point me in the right direction. Browser requirements are IE8, FF3.6, Safari, and Chrome, so in theory I can use some advanced CSS techniques. At least I don't have to support IE6.

    Read the article

  • mysql query to dynamically convert row data to columns

    - by Anirudh Goel
    I am working on a pivot table query. The schema is as follows Sno, Name, District The same name may appear in many districts eg take the sample data for example 1 Mike CA 2 Mike CA 3 Proctor JB 4 Luke MN 5 Luke MN 6 Mike CA 7 Mike LP 8 Proctor MN 9 Proctor JB 10 Proctor MN 11 Luke MN As you see i have a set of 4 distinct districts (CA, JB, MN, LP). Now i wanted to get the pivot table generated for it by mapping the name against districts Name CA JB MN LP Mike 3 0 0 1 Proctor 0 2 2 0 Luke 0 0 3 0 i wrote the following query for this select name,sum(if(District="CA",1,0)) as "CA",sum(if(District="JB",1,0)) as "JB",sum(if(District="MN",1,0)) as "MN",sum(if(District="LP",1,0)) as "LP" from district_details group by name However there is a possibility that the districts may increase, in that case i will have to manually edit the query again and add the new district to it. I want to know if there is a query which can dynamically take the names of distinct districts and run the above query. I know i can do it with a procedure and generating the script on the fly, is there any other method too? I ask so because the output of the query "select distinct(districts) from district_details" will return me a single column having district name on each row, which i will like to be transposed to the column.

    Read the article

  • Retrieve sequence of data from different columns.

    - by janetsmith
    Let's say I have a table containing following data: | id | t0 | t1 | t2 | | 1 | 4 | 5 | 6 | | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | | 3 | 6 | 4 | 5 | | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | I want to retrieve all the rows containing 4, 5, 6 (regardless the position of numbers in the tables), so row 1 & row 3 will be selected. How to do that with SQL query?

    Read the article

  • SubSonic 3 ignoring columns in Select()

    - by jessegavin
    I have a table like so.. CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Locations_Hours]( [LocationID] [int] NOT NULL, [sun_open] [nvarchar](10) NULL, [sun_close] [nvarchar](10) NULL, [mon_open] [nvarchar](10) NULL, [mon_close] [nvarchar](10) NULL, [tue_open] [nvarchar](10) NULL, [tue_close] [nvarchar](10) NULL, [wed_open] [nvarchar](10) NULL, [wed_close] [nvarchar](10) NULL, [thu_open] [nvarchar](10) NULL, [thu_close] [nvarchar](10) NULL, [fri_open] [nvarchar](10) NULL, [fri_close] [nvarchar](10) NULL, [sat_open] [nvarchar](10) NULL, [sat_close] [nvarchar](10) NULL, [StoreNumber] [int] NULL, [LocationHourID] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL, CONSTRAINT [PK_Locations_Hours] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED ( [LocationHourID] ASC )WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY] ) ON [PRIMARY] And SubSonic 3 is generating a class with the following properties int LocationID string monopen string monclose string tueopen string tueclose string wedopen string wedclose string thuopen string thuclose string friopen string friclose string satopen string satclose string sunopen string sunclose int? StoreNumber int LocationHourID When I try to perform a query against this class like so.. var result = DB.LocationHours.Where(o => o.LocationID == _locationId); This is the resulting SQL query that SubSonic generates. SELECT [t0].[LocationHourID], [t0].[LocationID], [t0].[StoreNumber] FROM [dbo].[Locations_Hours] AS t0 WHERE ([t0].[LocationID] = 4019) I cannot figure out why SubSonic is omitting the nvarchar fields when it generates the SELECT statement. Anyone got any ideas?

    Read the article

  • How do I correctly organize output into columns?

    - by wrongusername
    The first thing that comes to my mind is to do a bunch of \t's, but that would cause words to be misaligned if any word is longer than any other word by a few characters. For example, I would like to have something like: Name Last Name Middle initial Bob Jones M Joe ReallyLongLastName T Instead, by including only "\t"'s in my cout statement I can only manage to get Name Last Name Middle initial Bob Jones M Joe ReallyLongLastName T or Name Last Name Middle initial Bob Jones M Joe ReallyLongLastName T What else would I need to do?

    Read the article

  • Storing Objects in columns using Hibernate JPA

    - by user210791
    Is it possible to store something like the following using only one table? Right now, what hibernate will do is create two tables, one for Families and one for people. I would like for the familymembers object to be serialized into the column in the database. @Entity(name = "family") class Family{ private final List<Person> familyMembers; } class Person{ String firstName, lastName; int age; }

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34  | Next Page >