Search Results

Search found 27968 results on 1119 pages for 'javascript editor'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 27/1119 | < Previous Page | 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34  | Next Page >

  • Not able to see Images with wmd-editor

    - by KhanS
    I am using wmd editor to enter some text. After entering the text, I am saving it as mark down into the database. While inserting the image, if I save as markdown I am not able to see the image in my aspx page.(Because it down not save image in <img> tab in markdown). If I save the text as html then, I am able to see the image. But another problem with html is, while editing the text I am seeing all tags(such as <code1><p>pre> ) in the wmd-editor.

    Read the article

  • How to open db.sqlite in Aloha Editor?

    - by Mariusz Poplawski
    I'm using Aloha Editor and I'm able to save/edit content without any problem. Editor saves content in SQLite database (db.sqlite). I know where the file is and I see that's getting bigger while I'm adding more text to it. But when I transfer that fille using filezilla to local computer and I open in notepad I see only: ** This file contains an SQLite 2.1 database ** I've tried to use few programs but it always says that database that unable to open. The programs I've tried: Sqliteman-1.2.2 and sqlitebrowser_200_b1_win.

    Read the article

  • Where is the action listener registered?

    - by Summer_More_More_Tea
    Hi there: I come across this problem when referring a piece of javascript code: <a href="javascript:void(0);"><!-- other html elements --></a> It want to register a mouse click event listener on this anchor, but I cannot find which function is registered. What's more, what does the code href="javascript:void(0);" mean? Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • JavaScript: How to download JS asynchronously?

    - by Teddyk
    On my web site, I'm trying to accomplishes the fastest page load as possible. I've noticed that it appears my JavaScript are not loading asynchronously. Picture linked below. How my web site works is that it needs to load two external JavaScript files: Google Maps v3 JavaScript, and JQuery JavaScript Once it loads these external javascript files, it then, and only then, can dynamically render the page. The reason why my page can't load until both Google Maps and JQuery are loaded is that - my page, based on the geolocation (using Gmaps) of the user will then display the page based on where they are located (e.g. New York, San Francisco, etc). Meaning, two people in different cities viewing my site will see different frontpages. Question: How can I get my JavaScript files to download asynchronously so that my overall page load time is quicker?

    Read the article

  • Php inside javascript function

    - by jasminder
    What i am trying to do is inside script tags run javascript inside the php loops. For example: <script> $('#mydiv').mouseover(function(){ time(); function time(){ <?php $secs = 45; $secs--; if($secs <= 25){ ?>//javascript code here } }); </script> My main purpose is when the user mouseover a div, a javascript function runs and inside that javascript function there is php if conitions. If the time is less then 25 then do a specified javascript code. then another condition if the time is less that 10 then do another javascript function.Any type of help will be appreciated. THanks

    Read the article

  • JavaScript Sucks.

    - by Matt Watson
    JavaScript Sucks. Yes, I said it. Microsoft's announcement of TypeScript got me thinking today. Is this a step in the right direction? It sounds like it fixes a lot of problems with JavaScript development. But is it really just duct tape and super glue for a programming model that needs to be replaced?I have had a love hate relationship with JavaScript, like most developers who would prefer avoiding client side code. I started doing web development over 10 years ago and I have done some pretty cool stuff with JavaScript. It has came a long ways and is the universal standard these days for client side scripting in the web browser. Over the years the browsers have become much faster at processing JavaScript. Now people are even trying to use it on the server side via node.js. OK, so why do I think JavaScript sucks?Well first off, as an enterprise web application developer, I don't like any scripting or dynamic languages. I like code that compiles for lots of obvious reasons. It is messy to code with and lacks all kinds of modern programming features. We spend a lot of time trying to hack it to do things it was never really designed for.Ever try to use different jQuery based plugins that require conflicting jQuery versions? Yeah, that sucks.How about trying to figure out how to make 20 javascript include files load quicker as one request? Yeah that sucks too.Performance? Let me just point to the old Facebook mobile app made with JS & HTML5. It sucked. Enough said.How about unit testing JavaScript? I've never tried it, but it sure sounds like fun.My biggest problem with JavaScript is code security. If I make some awesome product, there is no way to protect my code. How can we expect game makers to write apps in 100% JavaScript and HTML5 if they can't protect their intellectual property?There are compiling tools like Closure, unit test frameworks, minify, coffee script, TypeScript and a bunch of other tools. But to me, they all try to make up for the weaknesses and problems with JavaScript. JavaScript is a mess and we spend a lot of time trying to work around all of it's problems. It is possible to program in Silverlight, Java or Flash and run that in the browser instead of JavaScript, but they all have their own problems and lack universal mobile support. I believe Microsoft's new TypeScript is a step forward for JavaScript, but I think we need to start planning to go a whole different direction. We need a new universal client side programming model, because JavaScript sucks.

    Read the article

  • How should data be passed between client-side Javascript and C# code behind an ASP.NET app?

    - by ctck
    I'm looking for the most efficient / standard way of passing data between client-side Javascript code and C# code behind an ASP.NET application. I've been using the following methods to achieve this but they all feel a bit of a fudge. To pass data from Javascript to the C# code is by setting hidden ASP variables and triggering a postback: <asp:HiddenField ID="RandomList" runat="server" /> function SetDataField(data) { document.getElementById('<%=RandomList.ClientID%>').value = data; } Then in the C# code I collect the list: protected void GetData(object sender, EventArgs e) { var _list = RandomList.value; } Going back the other way I often use either ScriptManager to register a function and pass it data during Page_Load: ScriptManager.RegisterStartupScript(this.GetType(), "Set","get("Test();",true); or I add attributes to controls before a post back or during the initialization or pre-rendering stages: Btn.Attributes.Add("onclick", "DisplayMessage("Hello");"); These methods have served me well and do the job, but they just dont feel complete. Is there a more standard way of passing data between client side Javascript and C# backend code? Ive seen some posts like this one that describe HtmlElement class; is this something I should look into?

    Read the article

  • Why the recent shift to removing/omitting semicolons from Javascript?

    - by Jonathan
    It seems to be fashionable recently to omit semicolons from Javascript. There was a blog post a few years ago emphasising that in Javascript, semicolons are optional and the gist of the post seemed to be that you shouldn't bother with them because they're unnecessary. The post, widely cited, doesn't give any compelling reasons not to use them, just that leaving them out has few side-effects. Even GitHub has jumped on the no-semicolon bandwagon, requiring their omission in any internally-developed code, and a recent commit to the zepto.js project by its maintainer has removed all semicolons from the codebase. His chief justifications were: it's a matter of preference for his team; less typing Are there other good reasons to leave them out? Frankly I can see no reason to omit them, and certainly no reason to go back over code to erase them. It also goes against (years of) recommended practice, which I don't really buy the "cargo cult" argument for. So, why all the recent semicolon-hate? Is there a shortage looming? Or is this just the latest Javascript fad?

    Read the article

  • Javascript widgets: do links count as SEO backlinks? [closed]

    - by j0nes
    Possible Duplicate: How good is it for SEO if you have a widget that lives on other sites? On my website I offer an option to let users embed information from my site with some kind of "homepage widget". If a user wants to embed it in his website, he basically has to add one line of Javascript to his HTML files like this: <script src="http://mysite.com/myscript.php?some_options_here"></script> Inside the widget, I export some content from my website and of course create a link back to my website. This is done in Javascript with document.write. document.writeln("My great exported content"); document.writeln('<a href="http://mysite.com?ref=widget>Check mysite.com</a>'); I have Google Analytics set up to track whether the links in there get clicked, and they do. Now I am asking myself if Google recognizes these links as valid backlinks from the embedding domain. I know that Googlebot can parse and execute Javascript, but I have not found any references whether these links also count as "normal" backlinks.

    Read the article

  • Browser side code editor component

    - by Serious
    Hello, do you know any browser-side component, in HTML/Javascript, Flash, Applet or Silverlight, that would allow source code edition with syntax highlighting and auto-completion. CodeMirror has a good syntax highlighting support but does not seem to support auto-completion. If no such editor exists do you know any way to implement auto-completion using HTML and javascript or any other browser-side technology ? Thanks by advance.

    Read the article

  • How dangerous can javascript be?

    - by CrazyJugglerDrummer
    I have recently started using noscript (in addition to ABP). It took a little while to get used to it and can occasionally require some clicking when visiting a new site to investigate why the site's not working and where I need to allow javascript from. Is the extra security worth it? Some of the controversy is discussed here. I suppose it boils down to a matter of whether javascript is a genuine threat to your computer or not. Any thoughts on this?

    Read the article

  • IE8 Refuses to run Javascript from Local Hard Drive

    - by Josh Stodola
    I have a problem that just started at work recently and the network manager is certain he did not change anything with the group policy. Anyways, here is a detailed description of the problem. My machine is Windows XP SP3, and I use IE8 to browse. We have McAffee anti-virus software that I am unable to configure. I use the following file to test... <!DOCTYPE html> <html> <head> <title>Javascript Test</title> </head> <body> <script type="text/javascript"> document.write("<h1>PASS</h1>"); </script> <noscript> <h1>FAIL</h1> </noscript> </body> </html> When I open this file from the C: drive, it fails every time. If I execute it anywhere else (local/remote web server or on a mapped network drive), it works just fine. When I am simply browsing the Internet, Javascript on web sites works just fine. It is only failing on files running from my C: drive. Additionally, I have had a couple other programmers in the department try this file on their C: drive, and it works fine for them. So I don't believe it is a group policy thing. I need to fix this because I do extensive testing from my C: drive, and I am accustomed to doing so. I don't want to get into the habit of moving files to a different drive just to test. Things I have tried: Enabled "Allow Active Content to Run Files on My Computer" in Options | Advanced | Security Enabled "Allow Active Scripting" in Options | Security | Custom Level Verified that "Script" was not checked as disabled in Developer Toolbar Added localhost to Trusted Sites in Options Disabled McAffee completely (momentarily, with help from network admin) Used an older DOCTYPE in my test HTML page Re-installed IE8 completely Ran regsvr32 on the JScript.dll Slammed keyboard I am sure that there is a setting somewhere that will fix this problem, possibly in the registry. I would not be surprised if it was related to the developer toolbar. At this point I do not know where else to look. Can anyone help me resolve this problem? EDIT: Regardless of the bounty, this issue is still ongoing.

    Read the article

  • A Simple Solution For NetBeans RCP Apps That Need A Groovy Editor

    - by Geertjan
    Take a look at Nils Hoffmann's metabolomic analyzer, especially at the Groovy editor contained within it: Obviously, it would be cool if the Groovy editor in the app above were to have syntax coloring and other editor features helpful in coding Groovy. However, as I showed in If You Include the Groovy Editor, there are multiple dependencies that the NetBeans Groovy support has on other modules that would be completely superfluous in the above application, while they'd make the app much heavier than it is, simply because of all the Groovy dependencies. But today I thought of a simple solution. Why not take the Groovy.g file (i.e., the ANTLR definition), such as this one [though that's probably not the most up to date one, wondering how to find the most up to date one] and then apply the content of this screencast (made by me) to the Groovy.g file: Within a few minutes, you should end up with Groovy syntax coloring. OK, so that's not a full blown Groovy editor, but syntax coloring is surely a cool thing to have in the app with which this blog entry started? Sure, this means creating a new Groovy editor from scratch. But the point is that doing so can be very simple, i.e., the syntax coloring can simply be generated via the simple instructions above. I'm going to try it myself in the next few days, but would be cool if others out there would try this too!

    Read the article

  • wmd editor (jquery version) over ajax forms

    - by Davide Barison
    i'm trying wmd editor over ajax. here there is the bugged code wdm code is based on openlibrary fork on github it work very good without ajax. but when i try to display editor over ajax form it doesn't load. non ajax version produce this html: <div id="wmd-container"> <div id="wmd-button-bar"></div> <div id="wmd-button-bar-0" class="wmd-button-bar"><ul class="wmd-button-row"><li style="background-position: 0px 0px;" title="Strong &lt;strong&gt; Ctrl+B" class="wmd-button wmd-bold-button"></li><li style="background-position: -20px 0px;" title="Emphasis &lt;em&gt; Ctrl+I" class="wmd-button wmd-italic-button"></li><li class="wmd-spacer"></li><li style="background-position: -40px 0px;" title="Hyperlink &lt;a&gt; Ctrl+L" class="wmd-button wmd-link-button"></li><li style="background-position: -60px 0px;" title="Blockquote &lt;blockquote&gt; Ctrl+Q" class="wmd-button wmd-quote-button"></li><li style="background-position: -80px 0px;" title="Code Sample &lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt; Ctrl+K" class="wmd-button wmd-code-button"></li><li style="background-position: -100px 0px;" title="Image &lt;img&gt; Ctrl+G" class="wmd-button wmd-image-button"></li><li class="wmd-spacer"></li><li style="background-position: -120px 0px;" title="Numbered List &lt;ol&gt; Ctrl+O" class="wmd-button wmd-olist-button"></li><li style="background-position: -140px 0px;" title="Bulleted List &lt;ul&gt; Ctrl+U" class="wmd-button wmd-ulist-button"></li><li style="background-position: -160px 0px;" title="Heading &lt;h1&gt;/&lt;h2&gt; Ctrl+H" class="wmd-button wmd-heading-button"></li><li style="background-position: -180px 0px;" title="Horizontal Rule &lt;hr&gt; Ctrl+R" class="wmd-button wmd-hr-button"></li><li class="wmd-spacer"></li><li style="background-position: -200px -20px;" title="Undo - Ctrl+Z" class="wmd-button wmd-undo-button"></li><li style="background-position: -220px -20px;" title="Redo - Ctrl+Shift+Z" class="wmd-button wmd-redo-button"></li><li style="background-position: -240px 0px;" class="wmd-button wmd-help-button"><a title="WMD website" target="_blank" href="http://wmd-editor.com/"></a></li></ul></div><div id="wmd-button-bar-2" class="wmd-button-bar"></div><div id="wmd-button-bar-4" class="wmd-button-bar"></div><textarea id="wmd-input" class="resizable" name="post-text" cols="92" rows="15" tabindex="101"></textarea><div id="wmd-preview-4" class="wmd-preview"></div><div id="wmd-preview-2" class="wmd-preview"></div><div id="wmd-preview-0" class="wmd-preview"></div> </div> with ajax form: <div id="wmd-container"> <div id="wmd-button-bar"></div> <div id="wmd-button-bar-1" class="wmd-button-bar"></div><div id="wmd-button-bar-3" class="wmd-button-bar"></div><textarea id="wmd-input" class="resizable" name="post-text" cols="92" rows="15" tabindex="101"></textarea><div id="wmd-preview-3" class="wmd-preview"></div><div id="wmd-preview-1" class="wmd-preview"></div> </div> any help?

    Read the article

  • Stack Overflow works best with JavaScript enabled banner

    - by carpenter
    I am trying to mimic this site's Javascipt required banner, and have the below divs which are being hidden if javascript is allowed/enabled, but I am getting a flash/glimps of it on page load. <div id="Main_noJS">Craftystuff.com works best with JavaScript enabled</div> <div id="PartOfMain_noJS"><br /></div> CSS: #Main_noJS { width: 100%; height: 23px; font-family: Arial; font-size: 111%; color: White; font-weight: bold; background: #AE0000; text-align: center; padding-top: 4px; position: fixed; z-index: 100; } JavaScript: // hide the "Craftystuff.com works best with JavaScript enabled" banner, if JavaScript is working if ($("#Main_noJS")) { $("#Main_noJS").hide(); // hide the spacer between the main content and banner... $("#PartOfMain_noJS").hide(); } So the banner is visible to start with, and only when javascript is enabled do I hide it but javascript must take a second to get to work to hide things... I would like to try to stop the glimps of the banner, when the page first loads, any help?

    Read the article

  • Load javascript in app engine

    - by user624392
    I got so confused loading javascript in app engine. I am using django template. In my base html file. First I can't load my downloaded jquery from local say d:/jquery.js like <script src="d:\jquery.js" type="text/javascript" ></script></head>, This line is in my base html file. It works when I load jquery from remote. Like <script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.5.1/jquery.min.js"type="text/javascript" ></script></head> I dont know why. Second, I can't load my own-created javascript to my html file, say I create a javascript like layout. Js and I try to load it like this in my child html file, which, by the way, inherits from the base html. <body><script src="layout.js" type="text/javascript"></script></body>, And it doesn't work at all, the only way it works I have tried is that I put the actual javascript in the body of my base html file. Like <body><script> $(document).ready( $("#yes"). Click(function() { $("#no"). Hide("slow"); })); </script> I dont know why either... Any help?

    Read the article

  • echo php javascript alert?

    - by Anaes Arias
    How can I echo this javascript if the php error messages is called? I have an error message setting that when a user misses his username or password it triggers an error message. The php error message is called by a php code. Here is the code: <?php echo showmessage($msg) ?> I have an alert message in javascript that when called it will make a javascript css pop up alert box. IF the javascript code is present it will show the alert box right away after reload. Here is code: <script type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { jqxAlert.alert('Alert Message'); }) </script> How can I incorporate so that when the php echo message comes up it will trigger the javscript alert message. I was trying an if in php, so something like this code: if ( showmessage($msg) ) { <script type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { jqxAlert.alert('Alert Message'); }) </script> } How can I echo my javascript message on the php call?

    Read the article

  • Eclipse > Javascript > Code highlighting not working with Object Notation

    - by Redsandro
    I am using Eclipse Helios with PDT, and when I am editing JavaScript files with the default JavaScript Editor (JSDT), code highlighting (Mark Occurrences) is not working for half of the code, for example JSON-style (or Object Literal if you will) declarations. Little example: Foo = {}; Foo.Bar = Foo.Bar || {}; Foo.Bar = { bar: function(str) { alert(str) }, baz: function(str) { this.bar(str); // This bar *is* highlighted though } }; Foo.Bar.baz('text'); No Bar, bar or baz is highlighted. For now, I humbly edit the JavaScript part of projects in Notepad++ because it just highlights every occurrence of whatever is currently selected. Is there a common practice for Eclipse JavaScript developers to get code highlighting work correctly, using the popular Object Literal notation? An option or update I missed? -update- I have found that code highlighting depends on the code being properly outlined. Altough commonly used, Object Literal outlining still seems rare in javascript editors. the Spket Javascript Editor does partial Object Literal outlining, and the Aptana Javascript Editor does full Object Literal outlining. But both loses other important functionality. A quest for the editor with the least loss of functionality is currently in progress in this question.

    Read the article

  • End-date greater than start-date validation javascript not working properly

    - by ianco slovak
    I am trying to make a validation for my dates so that enddate to be greater than start date but is not working.What am i doing wrong? <head> <script src="@Url.Content("~/Scripts/jquery.validate.min.js")" type="text/javascript"></script> <script src="@Url.Content("~/Scripts/jquery.validate.unobtrusive.min.js")" type="text/javascript"></script> <link href="@Url.Content("~/Content/Site.css")" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" /> <script src="@Url.Content("~/Scripts/jquery-ui-1.8.19.min.js")" type="text/javascript"></script> <script src="@Url.Content("~/Scripts/jquery-ui.unobtrusive.min.js")" type="text/javascript"></script> <script src="@Url.Content("~/Scripts/jquery-ui.unobtrusive-0.5.0.min.js")" type="text/javascript"></script> <script src="@Url.Content("~/Scripts/gen_validatorv4.js")" type="text/javascript"></script> </head> @using (Html.BeginForm("SearchFree", "Reservation", FormMethod.Get,new {id = "form" })) { <h7>Introduceti perioada Rezervarii</h7> <div class="editor-label"> <label id="cautare" for="StartDate">Data Intrare: </label>@(Html.JQueryUI().Datepicker("StartDate").DateFormat("mm-dd-yy").MinDate(DateTime.Today).ShowButtonPanel(true).ChangeYear(true).ChangeMonth(true).NumberOfMonths(2)) </div> <div class="editor-label"> <label id="cautare" for="EndDate">Data Iesire:</label>@(Html.JQueryUI().Datepicker("EndDate").DateFormat("mm-dd-yy").MinDate(DateTime.Today).ShowButtonPanel(true).ChangeYear(true).ChangeMonth(true).NumberOfMonths(2)) </div> <p> <input id="buton1" type="submit" value="Cauta camere libere" /> </p> } <script type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { $.validator.addMethod("EndDate", function (value, element) { var startDate = $('.StartDate').val(); return Date.parse(startDate) <= Date.parse(value); } , "* End date must be after start date"); $('.form').validate(); }); </script>

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34  | Next Page >