Search Results

Search found 24228 results on 970 pages for 'stress test'.

Page 27/970 | < Previous Page | 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34  | Next Page >

• AbstractMethodError on org.apache.xalan.processor.TransformerFactoryImpl

  - by JBristow

  With the following code: private Document transformDoc(Source source) throws TransformerException, IOException { Transformer xslTransformer = TransformerFactory.newInstance().newTransformer(new StreamSource(pdfTransformXslt.getInputStream())); xslTransformer.setParameter("http://apache.org/xml/features/nonvalidating/load-external-dtd", false); xslTransformer.setParameter("http://xml.org/sax/features/validation", false); JDOMResult result = new JDOMResult(); xslTransformer.transform(source, result); return result.getDocument(); } I'm getting the following error: java.lang.AbstractMethodError: org.apache.xalan.processor.TransformerFactoryImpl.setFeature(Ljava/lang/String;Z)V Why is this? Here's my Maven dependency tree: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Building mc-hub-batch task-segment: [dependency:tree] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ snapshot com.billmelater:mc-test-support:2.0.0.11-SNAPSHOT: checking for updates from repository.jboss.org [dependency:tree {execution: default-cli}] com.billmelater:mc-hub-batch:jar:2.0.0.11-SNAPSHOT +- com.billmelater:mc-hub-core:jar:2.0.0.11-SNAPSHOT:compile | +- commons-lang:commons-lang:jar:2.4:compile | +- commons-collections:commons-collections:jar:3.2.1:compile | +- commons-beanutils:commons-beanutils:jar:1.8.0:compile | +- commons-digester:commons-digester:jar:2.0:compile | | +- (commons-beanutils:commons-beanutils:jar:1.8.0:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | \- (commons-logging:commons-logging:jar:1.1.1:compile - version managed from 1.0.4; omitted for duplicate) | \- (org.springframework.batch:spring-batch-core:jar:2.0.2.RELEASE:compile - omitted for duplicate) +- com.billmelater:mc-test-support:jar:2.0.0.11-SNAPSHOT:test | +- (com.billmelater:mc-hub-core:jar:2.0.0.11-SNAPSHOT:test - omitted for duplicate) | +- (org.springframework:spring:jar:2.5.6:test - omitted for duplicate) | +- org.springframework:spring-jdbc:jar:2.5.6.SEC01:test | | +- (commons-logging:commons-logging:jar:1.1.1:test - omitted for duplicate) | | +- (org.springframework:spring-beans:jar:2.5.6.SEC01:test - omitted for conflict with 2.5.6) | | +- (org.springframework:spring-context:jar:2.5.6.SEC01:test - omitted for conflict with 2.5.6) | | +- (org.springframework:spring-core:jar:2.5.6.SEC01:test - omitted for conflict with 2.5.6) | | \- (org.springframework:spring-tx:jar:2.5.6.SEC01:test - omitted for conflict with 2.5.6) | +- (org.dbunit:dbunit:jar:2.4.5:test - omitted for duplicate) | +- (log4j:log4j:jar:1.2.15:test - omitted for duplicate) | +- (org.slf4j:slf4j-api:jar:1.5.6:compile - version managed from 1.5.8; scope updated from test; omitted for duplicate) | +- (org.slf4j:slf4j-log4j12:jar:1.5.6:test - omitted for duplicate) | +- org.jboss.seam:jboss-seam:jar:2.2.0.GA:test | | +- xstream:xstream:jar:1.1.3:test | | +- (xpp3:xpp3_min:jar:1.1.3.4.O:compile - scope updated from test; omitted for duplicate) | | \- org.jboss.el:jboss-el:jar:1.0_02.CR4:test | +- (org.testng:testng:jar:jdk15:5.8:test - omitted for duplicate) | +- (org.hibernate:hibernate-core:jar:3.3.2.GA:test - version managed from 3.3.0.SP1; omitted for duplicate) | +- org.hibernate:hibernate-entitymanager:jar:3.4.0.GA:test | | +- (org.hibernate:ejb3-persistence:jar:1.0.2.GA:test - omitted for duplicate) | | +- (org.hibernate:hibernate-commons-annotations:jar:3.1.0.GA:test - omitted for duplicate) | | +- (org.hibernate:hibernate-annotations:jar:3.4.0.GA:test - omitted for duplicate) | | +- (org.hibernate:hibernate-core:jar:3.3.2.GA:test - version managed from 3.3.0.SP1; omitted for duplicate) | | +- (org.slf4j:slf4j-api:jar:1.5.6:test - version managed from 1.4.2; omitted for duplicate) | | +- (dom4j:dom4j:jar:1.6.1-jboss:test - version managed from 1.6.1; omitted for duplicate) | | +- (javax.transaction:jta:jar:1.0.1B:test - version managed from 1.1; omitted for duplicate) | | \- javassist:javassist:jar:3.4.GA:test | +- (org.hibernate:hibernate-validator:jar:3.1.0.GA:test - omitted for duplicate) | +- (org.apache.velocity:velocity:jar:1.6.2:test - omitted for duplicate) | \- (ojdbc:ojdbc:jar:14:test - omitted for duplicate) +- org.springframework:spring:jar:2.5.6:compile +- org.springframework.batch:spring-batch-core:jar:2.0.2.RELEASE:compile | +- org.springframework.batch:spring-batch-infrastructure:jar:2.0.2.RELEASE:compile | | +- (commons-logging:commons-logging:jar:1.1.1:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | +- (org.springframework:spring-core:jar:2.5.6:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | \- (stax:stax:jar:1.2.0:compile - omitted for duplicate) | +- org.aspectj:aspectjrt:jar:1.5.4:compile | +- org.aspectj:aspectjweaver:jar:1.5.4:compile | +- com.thoughtworks.xstream:xstream:jar:1.3:compile | | \- xpp3:xpp3_min:jar:1.1.4c:compile | +- org.codehaus.jettison:jettison:jar:1.0:compile | +- org.springframework:spring-aop:jar:2.5.6:compile | | +- aopalliance:aopalliance:jar:1.0:compile | | +- (commons-logging:commons-logging:jar:1.1.1:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | +- (org.springframework:spring-beans:jar:2.5.6:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | \- (org.springframework:spring-core:jar:2.5.6:compile - omitted for duplicate) | +- org.springframework:spring-beans:jar:2.5.6:compile | | +- (commons-logging:commons-logging:jar:1.1.1:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | \- (org.springframework:spring-core:jar:2.5.6:compile - omitted for duplicate) | +- org.springframework:spring-context:jar:2.5.6:compile | | +- (aopalliance:aopalliance:jar:1.0:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | +- (commons-logging:commons-logging:jar:1.1.1:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | +- (org.springframework:spring-beans:jar:2.5.6:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | \- (org.springframework:spring-core:jar:2.5.6:compile - omitted for duplicate) | +- org.springframework:spring-core:jar:2.5.6:compile | | \- (commons-logging:commons-logging:jar:1.1.1:compile - omitted for duplicate) | +- org.springframework:spring-tx:jar:2.5.6:compile | | +- (commons-logging:commons-logging:jar:1.1.1:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | +- (org.springframework:spring-beans:jar:2.5.6:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | +- (org.springframework:spring-context:jar:2.5.6:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | \- (org.springframework:spring-core:jar:2.5.6:compile - omitted for duplicate) | \- stax:stax:jar:1.2.0:compile | \- stax:stax-api:jar:1.0.1:compile +- commons-dbcp:commons-dbcp:jar:1.2.2:compile | \- commons-pool:commons-pool:jar:1.3:compile +- org.hibernate:hibernate-core:jar:3.3.2.GA:compile | +- antlr:antlr:jar:2.7.7:compile (version managed from 2.7.6) | +- dom4j:dom4j:jar:1.6.1-jboss:compile (version managed from 1.6.1) | +- javax.transaction:jta:jar:1.0.1B:compile (version managed from 1.1) | \- (org.slf4j:slf4j-api:jar:1.5.6:compile - version managed from 1.4.2; omitted for duplicate) +- org.hibernate:hibernate-validator:jar:3.1.0.GA:compile | +- (org.hibernate:hibernate-core:jar:3.3.2.GA:compile - version managed from 3.3.0.SP1; omitted for duplicate) | +- org.hibernate:hibernate-commons-annotations:jar:3.1.0.GA:compile | | \- (org.slf4j:slf4j-api:jar:1.5.6:compile - version managed from 1.4.2; omitted for duplicate) | \- (org.slf4j:slf4j-api:jar:1.5.6:compile - version managed from 1.4.2; omitted for duplicate) +- org.hibernate:hibernate-annotations:jar:3.4.0.GA:compile | +- org.hibernate:ejb3-persistence:jar:1.0.2.GA:compile | +- (org.hibernate:hibernate-commons-annotations:jar:3.1.0.GA:compile - omitted for duplicate) | +- (org.hibernate:hibernate-core:jar:3.3.2.GA:compile - version managed from 3.3.0.SP1; omitted for duplicate) | +- (org.slf4j:slf4j-api:jar:1.5.6:compile - version managed from 1.4.2; omitted for duplicate) | \- (dom4j:dom4j:jar:1.6.1-jboss:compile - version managed from 1.6.1; omitted for duplicate) +- ojdbc:ojdbc:jar:14:compile +- org.slf4j:slf4j-api:jar:1.5.6:compile +- org.slf4j:slf4j-log4j12:jar:1.5.6:compile | \- (org.slf4j:slf4j-api:jar:1.5.6:compile - version managed from 1.4.2; omitted for duplicate) +- log4j:log4j:jar:1.2.15:compile +- org.apache.velocity:velocity:jar:1.6.2:compile | +- (commons-collections:commons-collections:jar:3.2.1:compile - omitted for duplicate) | +- (commons-lang:commons-lang:jar:2.4:compile - omitted for duplicate) | \- oro:oro:jar:2.0.8:compile +- org.testng:testng:jar:jdk15:5.8:test +- org.dbunit:dbunit:jar:2.4.5:test | +- junit:junit:jar:4.7:test (version managed from 3.8.2) | +- (org.slf4j:slf4j-api:jar:1.5.6:test - version managed from 1.4.2; omitted for duplicate) | \- (commons-collections:commons-collections:jar:3.2.1:test - omitted for duplicate) +- hsqldb:hsqldb:jar:1.8.0.7:test +- jboss:javassist:jar:3.3.ga:provided +- org.jdom:jdom:jar:1.1:compile +- jaxen:jaxen:jar:1.1.1:provided +- org.apache.xmlgraphics:fop:jar:0.95:compile | +- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:xmlgraphics-commons:jar:1.3.1:compile - omitted for duplicate) | +- org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-svg-dom:jar:1.7:compile | | +- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-svg-dom:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for cycle) | | +- org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-anim:jar:1.7:compile | | | +- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-awt-util:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | | +- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-dom:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | | +- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-ext:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | | \- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-parser:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | +- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-awt-util:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | +- org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-css:jar:1.7:compile | | | +- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-ext:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | | +- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-util:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | | \- (xml-apis:xml-apis-ext:jar:1.3.04:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | +- org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-dom:jar:1.7:compile | | | +- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-css:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | | +- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-ext:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | | +- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-util:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | | +- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-xml:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | | +- (xalan:xalan:jar:2.6.0:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | | \- (xml-apis:xml-apis-ext:jar:1.3.04:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | +- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-ext:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | +- org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-parser:jar:1.7:compile | | | +- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-awt-util:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | | +- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-util:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | | \- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-xml:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | +- org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-util:jar:1.7:compile | | \- xml-apis:xml-apis-ext:jar:1.3.04:compile | +- org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-bridge:jar:1.7:compile | | +- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-anim:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | +- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-awt-util:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | +- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-css:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | +- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-dom:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | +- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-ext:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | +- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-bridge:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for cycle) | | +- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-gvt:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | +- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-parser:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | +- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-bridge:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for cycle) | | +- org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-script:jar:1.7:compile | | +- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-svg-dom:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | +- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-util:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | +- org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-xml:jar:1.7:compile | | | \- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-util:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | +- xalan:xalan:jar:2.6.0:compile | | \- (xml-apis:xml-apis-ext:jar:1.3.04:compile - omitted for duplicate) | +- org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-awt-util:jar:1.7:compile | | \- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-util:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for duplicate) | +- org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-gvt:jar:1.7:compile | | +- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-awt-util:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | +- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-gvt:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for cycle) | | +- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-bridge:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | \- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-util:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for duplicate) | +- org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-transcoder:jar:1.7:compile | | +- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-awt-util:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | +- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-bridge:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | +- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-dom:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | +- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-gvt:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | +- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-svg-dom:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | +- org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-svggen:jar:1.7:compile | | | +- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-awt-util:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | | \- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-util:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | +- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-util:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | +- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-xml:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | \- (xml-apis:xml-apis-ext:jar:1.3.04:compile - omitted for duplicate) | +- org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-extension:jar:1.7:compile | | +- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-awt-util:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | +- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-bridge:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | +- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-css:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | +- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-dom:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | +- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-ext:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | +- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-gvt:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | +- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-parser:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | +- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-svg-dom:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | +- (org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-util:jar:1.7:compile - omitted for duplicate) | | \- (xml-apis:xml-apis-ext:jar:1.3.04:compile - omitted for duplicate) | +- org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik-ext:jar:1.7:compile | +- commons-logging:commons-logging:jar:1.1.1:compile | +- commons-io:commons-io:jar:1.3.1:compile | \- org.apache.avalon.framework:avalon-framework-api:jar:4.3.1:compile +- org.apache.xmlgraphics:xmlgraphics-commons:jar:1.3.1:compile | +- (commons-io:commons-io:jar:1.3.1:compile - omitted for duplicate) | \- (commons-logging:commons-logging:jar:1.1.1:compile - version managed from 1.0.4; omitted for duplicate) +- org.easymock:easymock:jar:2.0:test \- org.easymock:easymockclassextension:jar:2.2:test +- (org.easymock:easymock:jar:2.2:test - omitted for conflict with 2.0) \- cglib:cglib-nodep:jar:2.2:test (version managed from 2.1_3) Can anyone tell me how to clear out intellij's classpath too?

  Read the article

• T-4 Templates for ASP.NET Web Form Databound Control Friendly Logical Layers

  - by joycsharp

  I just released an open source project at codeplex, which includes a set of T-4 templates to enable you to build logical layers (i.e. DAL/BLL) with just few clicks! The logical layers implemented here are  based on Entity Framework 4.0, ASP.NET Web Form Data Bound control friendly and fully unit testable. In this open source project you will get Entity Framework 4.0 based T-4 templates for following types of logical layers: Data Access Layer: Entity Framework 4.0 provides excellent ORM data access layer. It also includes support for T-4 templates, as built-in code generation strategy in Visual Studio 2010, where we can customize default structure of data access layer based on Entity Framework. default structure of data access layer has been enhanced to get support for mock testing in Entity Framework 4.0 object model. Business Logic Layer: ASP.NET web form based data bound control friendly business logic layer, which will enable you few clicks to build data bound web applications on top of ASP.NET Web Form and Entity Framework 4.0 quickly with great support of mock testing. Download it to make your web development productive. Enjoy!

  Read the article

• Keyboard locking up in Visual Studio 2010, Part 2

  - by Jim Wang

  Last week I posted about looking into the keyboard locking up issue in Visual Studio.  So far it looks like not a lot of people have replied to provide concrete repro steps, which confirms my suspicion that this is somewhat of a random issue. So at this point, I have a couple of choices.  I can either wait for somebody in the community to provide a repro of the problem that I can reliably run into, or I can do the work myself. I’m going to do both, so while I’m waiting for more possible bug reports, I’m going to write a tool that models the behavior of a typical Visual Studio user and use that to hopefully isolate the problem. I’ve chosen to go with this path since given the information in the bug reports, it seems people hit the issue with many different configurations in many different scenarios.  This means that me sitting down without any solid repro steps is likely not going to be a good use of time.  Instead, I’m going to go with a model-based testing approach where I will define a series of actions that a user in VS can do, and then proceed to run my model.  I’ll let you guys know how this works out for isolating bugs :) I’m using an internal tool for the model engine and AutoIt for the UI automation (I want something lightweight for a one-off).  One of the challenges will be getting feedback: AutoIt is great at driving, but not so great at understanding what success and failure means.

  Read the article

• Technical development decision for my newly established software company

  - by test test

  I have a new software company where I am planning to develop CRM system. So I have settled down on the technological approach I am going to use:- I will use an open source Java-based CRM engine. I will use a third party reporting tool named JasperReports for providing reports capabilities for the CRM. I will develop the interface and any customization which the customer might ask for using asp.net mvc framework since my knowledge and experience are based on asp.net. And I will use the CRM API to integrate my asp.net web application with the Java-based CRM. I have developed a simple demo which integrate these three main components (CRM engine, asp.net application and the reporting tool) and they worked well. But I am afraid of the following risk that I might face if I go with the above approach: I should hire developers with different skills and experience: Developers with Java skills to be able to modify the Java-based CRM and writing plug-ins -when needed- to extend the CRM capabilities. Other developers with asp.net skills to be able to build the application such as application forms, the portal from where users will be able to start the CRM processes, searching capabilities, etc. So might the above point raise some risks when I start hiring a new team and start building the CRM application, OR I am on the right track at this early stage?

  Read the article

• TDD with limited resources

  - by bunglestink

  I work in a large company, but on a just two man team developing desktop LOB applications. I have been researching TDD for quite a while now, and although it is easy to realize its benefits for larger applications, I am having a hard time trying to justify the time to begin using TDD on the scale of our applications. I understand its advantages in automating testing, improving maintainability, etc., but on our scale, writing even basic unit tests for all of our components could easily double development time. Since we are already undermanned with extreme deadlines, I am not sure what direction to take. While other practices such as agile iterative development make perfect since, I am kind of torn over the productivity trade-offs of TDD on a small team. Are the advantages of TDD worth the extra development time on small teams with very tight schedules?

  Read the article

• Part 1 - Load Testing In The Cloud

  - by Tarun Arora

  Azure is fascinating, but even more fascinating is the marriage of Azure and TFS! Introduction Recently a client I worked for had 2 major business critical applications being delivered, with very little time budgeted for Performance testing, we immediately hit a bottleneck when the performance testing phase started, the in house infrastructure team could not support the hardware requirements in the short notice. It was suggested that the performance testing be performed on one of the QA environments which was a fraction of the production environment. This didn’t seem right, the team decided to turn to the cloud. The team took advantage of the elasticity offered by Azure, starting with a single test agent which was provisioned and ready for use with in 30 minutes the team scaled up to 17 test agents to perform a very comprehensive performance testing cycle. Issues were identified and resolved but the highlight was that the cost of running the ‘test rig’ proved to be less than if hosted on premise by the infrastructure team. Thank you for taking the time out to read this blog post, in the series of posts, I’ll try and cover the start to end of everything you need to know to use Azure to build your Test Rig in the cloud. But Why Azure? I have my own Data Centre… If the environment is provisioned in your own datacentre, - No matter what level of service agreement you may have with your infrastructure team there will be down time when the environment is patched - How fast can you scale up or down the environments (keeping the enterprise processes in mind) Administration, Cost, Flexibility and Scalability are the areas you would want to think around when taking the decision between your own Data Centre and Azure! How is Microsoft's Public Cloud Offering different from Amazon’s Public Cloud Offering? Microsoft's offering of the Cloud is a hybrid of Platform as a Service (PaaS) and Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) which distinguishes Microsoft's offering from other providers such as Amazon (Amazon only offers IaaS). PaaS – Platform as a Service IaaS – Infrastructure as a Service Fills the needs of those who want to build and run custom applications as services. Similar to traditional hosting, where a business will use the hosted environment as a logical extension of the on-premises datacentre. A service provider offers a pre-configured, virtualized application server environment to which applications can be deployed by the development staff. Since the service providers manage the hardware (patching, upgrades and so forth), as well as application server uptime, the involvement of IT pros is minimized. On-demand scalability combined with hardware and application server management relieves developers from infrastructure concerns and allows them to focus on building applications. The servers (physical and virtual) are rented on an as-needed basis, and the IT professionals who manage the infrastructure have full control of the software configuration. This kind of flexibility increases the complexity of the IT environment, as customer IT professionals need to maintain the servers as though they are on-premises. The maintenance activities may include patching and upgrades of the OS and the application server, load balancing, failover clustering of database servers, backup and restoration, and any other activities that mitigate the risks of hardware and software failures.   The biggest advantage with PaaS is that you do not have to worry about maintaining the environment, you can focus all your time in solving the business problems with your solution rather than worrying about maintaining the environment. If you decide to use a VM Role on Azure, you are asking for IaaS, more on this later. A nice blog post here on the difference between Saas, PaaS and IaaS. Now that we are convinced why we should be turning to the cloud and why in specific Azure, let’s discuss about the Test Rig. The Load Test Rig – Topology Now the moment of truth, Of course a big part of getting value from cloud computing is identifying the most adequate workloads to take to the cloud, so I’ve decided to try to make a Load Testing rig where the Agents are running on Windows Azure.   I’ll talk you through the above Topology, - User: User kick starts the load test run from the developer workstation on premise. This passes the request to the Test Controller. - Test Controller: The Test Controller is on premise connected to the same domain as the developer workstation. As soon as the Test Controller receives the request it makes use of the Windows Azure Connect service to orchestrate the test responsibilities to all the Test Agents. The Windows Azure Connect endpoint software must be active on all Azure instances and on the Controller machine as well. This allows IP connectivity between them and, given that the firewall is properly configured, allows the Controller to send work loads to the agents. In parallel, the Controller will collect the performance data from the agents, using the traditional WMI mechanisms. - Test Agents: The Test Agents are on the Windows Azure Public Cloud, as soon as the test controller issues instructions to the test agents, the test agents start executing the load tests. The HTTP requests are issued against the web server on premise, the results are captured by the test agents. And finally the results are passed over to the controller. - Servers: The Web Server and DB Server are hosted on premise in the datacentre, this is usually the case with business critical applications, you probably want to manage them your self. Recap and What’s next? So, in the introduction in the series of blog posts on Load Testing in the cloud I highlighted why creating a test rig in the cloud is a good idea, what advantages does Windows Azure offer and the Test Rig topology that I will be using. I would also like to mention that i stumbled upon this [Video] on Azure in a nutshell, great watch if you are new to Windows Azure. In the next post I intend to start setting up the Load Test Environment and discuss pricing with respect to test agent machine types that will be used in the test rig. Hope you enjoyed this post, If you have any recommendations on things that I should consider or any questions or feedback, feel free to add to this blog post. Remember to subscribe to http://feeds.feedburner.com/TarunArora.  See you in Part II.   Share this post : CodeProject

  Read the article

• Finally! Entity Framework working in fully disconnected N-tier web app

  - by oazabir

  Entity Framework was supposed to solve the problem of Linq to SQL, which requires endless hacks to make it work in n-tier world. Not only did Entity Framework solve none of the L2S problems, but also it made it even more difficult to use and hack it for n-tier scenarios. It’s somehow half way between a fully disconnected ORM and a fully connected ORM like Linq to SQL. Some useful features of Linq to SQL are gone – like automatic deferred loading. If you try to do simple select with join, insert, update, delete in a disconnected architecture, you will realize not only you need to make fundamental changes from the top layer to the very bottom layer, but also endless hacks in basic CRUD operations. I will show you in this article how I have  added custom CRUD functions on top of EF’s ObjectContext to make it finally work well in a fully disconnected N-tier web application (my open source Web 2.0 AJAX portal – Dropthings) and how I have produced a 100% unit testable fully n-tier compliant data access layerfollowing the repository pattern. http://www.codeproject.com/KB/linq/ef.aspx In .NET 4.0, most of the problems are solved, but not all. So, you should read this article even if you are coding in .NET 4.0. Moreover, there’s enough insight here to help you troubleshoot EF related problems. You might think “Why bother using EF when Linq to SQL is doing good enough for me.” Linq to SQL is not going to get any innovation from Microsoft anymore. Entity Framework is the future of persistence layer in .NET framework. All the innovations are happening in EF world only, which is frustrating. There’s a big jump on EF 4.0. So, you should plan to migrate your L2S projects to EF soon.

  Read the article

• Who does code coverage testing?

  - by Athiruban

  Recently, I was given an opportunity to increase the code coverage in a project based on Java Swing, MySQL and other technologies. They told me to bring the code coverage to 100%, while it was only 45% at the time I joined. I am just starting, not a professional developer, right from the beginning I felt bad even though I write and understand computer programs well. (The developed code contains a lot of technical stuff like Generics and no documentation about the code is available.) Has anyone experienced the same situation before? Please tell who is the right person to do the job.

  Read the article

• Automation at GUI or API Level in Scrum

  - by Sani Parwani

  I am a Automation Engineer. I use QTP for Automation. I wanted to know couple of things. In a scrum Project which has 2 weeks of work, how can complete automation be done in that time frame (talking only about the GUI Level)? Similarly, how can API Level of automated testing be accomplished, especially inside a single sprint? And what exactly is API level testing? How to begin with API Testing? I assume QTP is not the tool here certainly.

  Read the article

• Should tests be self written in TDD?

  - by martin

  We run a project, which we want to solve with test driven development. I thought about some questions that came up, when initiating the project. One question was, who should write the unit-test for a feature. Should the unit-test be written by the feature-implementing programmer? Or should the unit test be written by another programmer, who defines what a method should do and the feature-implementing programmer implements the method until the tests runs? If i understand the concept of TDD in the right way. The feature-implementing programmer has to write the test by himself, because TDD is procedure with mini-iterations. So it would be too complex to have the tests written by another programmer? What would you say, should the tests in TDD written by the programmer himself or should another programmer write the tests that describes what a method can do?

  Read the article

• Apache internal test servers

  - by user74274

  I want to build a test system in the office. On one box I will install XAMPP. I will put a website that I want to test on that box. Now I do not want it connected to the Internet. So my plan is to use a reverse proxy to resolve things like ads and other external links. So I am thinking of using mod_proxy for that. Now my question is, How many boxes do I need? 1 for Xampp, 1 for mod_proxy and 1 for the server where mod proxy redirects them to. Total of three. But maybe I could do it with less. Can I run Mod_proxy on the first box? Is there a better way? Thanks

  Read the article

• How to create Isolated test environment

  - by Safin09

  Hi All, I am very new to the VMware world. We have VMWare vCenter 4 in the production environment but we have created multiple VLAN through Cisco Switch. I want know, how I can create an isolated test environment for software testing purpose only, so anything will happen in that test vLan will not make trouble in the production environment. "Host-only networking" is the solution or there is a better way to achieve this result? My requirements A. Hosts should be able to access Internet and a Network Share drive but not Production network B. Hosts should connect each other inside the Virtual LAN C. I should be able to take automatic or periodic backup or snapshoot and deploy snapshot when necessary. Whatever your answer is, please give me steps, how to do, if possible. If I need to purchase anything, I am ready to do but I don't want to spend big money. Many thanks in advance.

  Read the article

• How to test TempDB performance?

  - by Matt Penner

  I'm getting some conflicting advice on how to best configure our SQL storage with our current SAN. I would like to do some of my own performance testing with a few different configurations. I looked at using SQLIOSim but it doesn't seem to simulate TempDB. Can anyone recommend a way to test data, log and TempDB performance? What about using a SQL profiler trace file from our production system? How would I use This to run against my test server? Thanks, Matt

  Read the article

• nginx redirect TLD to TLD with virtual folder (example.com => example.com/test)

  - by Amund

  Im running nginx and in the config file I need to always have the domain example.com redirect to example.com/test. I tried various methods for achieving this but I always got a redirect error. What is the correct way to do this? nginx.conf snippet: server { server_name example.com www.example.com; location / { rewrite ^.+ /test permanent; } } server { listen 80; server_name www.example.com example.com; location / { root /var/www/apps/example/current/public; passenger_enabled on; rails_env production; } } Thanks!

  Read the article

• Test/Dummy SMTP server for Windows

  - by geoaxis

  I would like to install a Test/Dummy SMTP server on a Windows 2008 server (virtual box). I just want to test my web application on the machine it self so I don't need the mails to go out on the internet, but just to be written to disk (so that I can verify that the mail function was indeed called and the correct data was handed over to SMTP) Can you recommend some tool. I guess starting your own SMTP server in python is an option. I am looking for a simple (ready to use) solution, targeted for tests systems. I will need to integrate it to automated tests (Selenium) at a later stage. Thanks

  Read the article

• Process of carrying out a BER Test

  - by data

  I am subscribed to an ISP supplying a 3meg ADSL line. Lately (for the last 4 weeks) speeds have dropped from the usual average downstream speed of ~250kbps to just 0.14Mbps (according to speedtest.net) and employees are complaining about lack of access to the server. I have been calling customer support and logging calls for the last 3 weeks, but they have been unable to determine the source of the problem other than carrying out a few bitstream tests and checking the DHCP renewal times. I am going to call back and suggest carrying out a BER test. What type of equipment is needed to carry out this test? I have access to a wide range of Cisco networking equipment. Other: We don't need a leased line as there are less than ten employees.

  Read the article

• Test wireless speed?

  - by ULTRA_POROV

  Is there an utility that can test the speed between my pc and the wireless access point i am connected to?

  Read the article

• Proccess of carrying out a BER Test

  - by data

  I am subscribed to an ISP supplying a 3meg ADSL line. Lately (for the last 4 weeks) speeds have dropped from the usual average downstream speed of ~250kbps to just 0.14Mbps (according to speedtest.net) and employees are complaining about lack of access to the server. I have been calling customer support and logging calls for the last 3 weeks, but they have been unable to determine the source of the problem other carrying out a few bitstream tests and checking the DHCP renewal times. I am going to call back and suggest carrying out a BER test. What type of equipment is needed to carry out this test? I have access to a wide range of Cisco networking equipment. Other: We dont need a leased line as there are less than ten employees.

  Read the article

• -w test on OS X gives command not found error

  - by RobV

  I'm writing a bash script which I'm testing on OS X though it will ultimately run on a standard Linux environment and running into a weird error. I have tests like this in my script: if [ ! -w $BP ]; then echo "'$1' not writable" exit 1 fi Which seems pretty sane to me and works fine under Linux but when trying to test on OS X I get the following error message: startSvr.sh: line 135: [: missing `]' startSvr.sh: line 135: -w: command not found So is this a case of OS X not supporting the -w test or is there some other reason this isn't working for me? e.g. environment

  Read the article

• Couchdb failing test suite on Linux

  - by user52674

  Hi I've been trying to install CouchDB on my webfusion virtual server. I followed the latest instructions from the webfusion forum (see: http://forum.webfaction.com/viewtopic.php?id=2355 ) and it runs (just) Futon is very sluggish and I get 502 errors. Anyway when I run the test suite it fails on multiple tests. Webfaction support have been great but don't have erlang experience to interpret the error logs. Can anyone help me know what might be wrong? Test suite result: basics, all_docs, attachments, attachments_multipart, attachment_names, compact, config, conflicts, delayed_commits, design_docs, design_options all the errors are: Exception raised: {"error":"unknown","reason":"\u000d\u000a502 Bad Gateway\u000d\u000a\u000d\u000a<\h1502 Bad Gateway\u000d\u000a nginx\u000d\u000a\u000d\u000a\u000d\u000a"} except for 'compact; which also has: Assertion failed: xhr.responseText == "This is a base64 encoded text" Assertion failed: xhr.getResponseHeader("Content-Type") == "text/plain" I'm stumped. Anybody know what these indicate? AL

  Read the article

• What's a worthwhile test for a new HD?

  - by Michael Kohne

  I work for a company that uses standard 2.5" SATA HD's in our product. We presently test them by running the Linux 'badblocks -w' command on them when we get them - but they are 160 gig drives, so that takes like 5 hours (we boot parted magic onto a PC to do the scan). We don't actually build that many systems at a time, so this doable, but seriously annoying. Is there any research or anecdotal evidence on what a good incoming test for a hard drive should be? I'm thinking that we should just wipe them with all zeros, write out our image, and do a full drive read back. That would end up being only about 1 hour 45 minutes total. Given that drives do block remapping on their own, would what I've proposed show up any infant mortality just as well as running badblocks?

  Read the article

• Use test to check for condition with find and execdir option

  - by slosd

  I think I can keep my question short. Why does the following command produce no output? find /usr/share/themes -mindepth 1 -maxdepth 1 -type d -execdir test -d {}/gnome-shell \; I expected it to print all folders in /usr/share/themes that contain a folder gnome-shell. Several websites suggest that this usage of test as a command in exec/execdir is possible. From man find: -exec command ; Execute command; true if 0 status is returned. [...]

  Read the article

• Test run errors with MSTest in VS2010

  - by Tomas Lycken

  When I run my Unit Tests, all tests pass, but instead of "Test run succeeded" or whatever the success message is, I get "Test run error" in the little bar that tells me how many of my tests pass, even though all my tests passed. When i click the text, I'm taken to a page that tells me the following two things happened: Warning: conflict during test run deployment: deployment item '[...]\Booking.Web.dll' directly or indirectly referenced by the test container [...]\Booking.Web.Tests.dll cannot be deployed to 'Booking.Web.dll' because otherwise the file '[...]\Booking.Web.dll' would override deployment item '[...]\Booking.Web.dll' directly or indirectly referenced by '[...]\Booking.Web.Tests.dll' Error: Cannot initialize the ASP.NET project 'Booking.Web' Exception was thrown: The website could not be configured correctly; getting ASP.NET proccess information failed. Requesting 'http://localhost:54131/VSEnterpriseHelper.axd' returned an error: The remote server returned an error: (500) Internal Server Error. I don't understand half of what it's complaining about. How do I get rid of these errors? (And for reference: Booking.Web is an ASP.NET MVC 2 project, Booking.Web.Tests is a Test project, [...] is the full local path to the projects in my environment, in most of the cases above to the /bin/debug/ folder inside the Booking.Web project)

  Read the article

• Setup Google Test (gtest) with Eclipse on OS X

  - by ejel

  What is the procedure to setup Google Test to work under Eclipse on Mac OS X? I followed the instruction in README to compile and install gtest as framework from XCode. Now I want to use gtest with Eclipse. Currently, it compiles fine but fails during build. I suppose Eclipse does not use framework concept as XCode does and need a different linking approach, but I'm not sure which files should I link to during build. g++ -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib/libgtest.a -L/Library/Frameworks/gtest.framework -arch i386 -o "Raytracer" ./test/sample_test.o ./src/Raytracer.o Undefined symbols: "testing::Test::~Test()", referenced from: DemoTest_SANITY_Test::~DemoTest_SANITY_Test()in sample_test.o DemoTest_SANITY_Test::~DemoTest_SANITY_Test()in sample_test.o "testing::internal::AssertHelper::~AssertHelper()", referenced from: DemoTest_SANITY_Test::TestBody() in sample_test.o DemoTest_SANITY_Test::TestBody() in sample_test.o

  Read the article

• Maven - Skip building test classes

  - by Walter White

  Hi all, Is there a simple way to not build the test classes? mvn clean install -Dmaven.test.skip=true Walter

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34  | Next Page >