Search Results

Search found 55630 results on 2226 pages for 'asp net routing'.

Page 28/2226 | < Previous Page | 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35  | Next Page >

  • Altering the ASP.NET MVC 2 ActionResult on HTTP post

    - by Inge Henriksen
    I want to do some processing on a attribute before returning the view. If I set the appModel.Markup returned in the HttpPost ActionResult method below to "modified" it still says "original" on the form. Why cant I modify my attribute in a HttpGet ActionResult method? [HttpGet] public ActionResult Index() { return View(new MyModel { Markup = "original" }); } [HttpPost] public ActionResult Index(MyModel appModel) { return View(new MyModel { Markup = "modified" }); }

    Read the article

  • Asp.net mvc json

    - by user310657
    Hi, I am working on a mvc project, and having problem with json. i have created a demo project with list of colors public JsonResult GetResult() { List strList = new List(); strList.Add("white"); strList.Add("blue"); strList.Add("black"); strList.Add("red"); strList.Add("orange"); strList.Add("green"); return this.Json(strList); } i am able to get these on my page, but when i try to delete one color, that is when i send the following using jquery function deleteItem(item) { $.ajax({ type: "POST", url: "/Home/Delete/white", data: "{}", contentType: "application/json; charset=utf-8", success: ajaxCallSucceed, dataType: "json", failure: ajaxCallFailed }); } the controler action public JsonResult Delete(string Color) {} Color always returns null, even if i have specified "/Home/Delete/white" in the url. i know i am doing something wrong or missing something, but not able to find out what. please can any one guide me in the right direction.

    Read the article

  • Asp.net: Replace GenericPrincipal

    - by Pickels
    Hello, I was wondering what the best way is to replace the genericPrincipal with my own CustomGenericPrincipal. At the moment I have something like this but I aint sure if it's correct. protected void Application_AuthenticateRequest(Object sender, EventArgs e) { HttpCookie authCookie = Request.Cookies[FormsAuthentication.FormsCookieName]; if (authCookie != null) { FormsAuthenticationTicket authTicket = FormsAuthentication.Decrypt(authCookie.Value); var identity = new CustomIdentity(authTicket); var principal = new CustomPrincipal(identity); Context.User = principal; } else { //Todo: check if this is correct var genericIdentity = new CustomGenericIdentity(); Context.User = new CustomPrincipal(genericIdentity); } } I need to replace it because I need a Principal that implements my ICustomPrincipal interface because I am doing the following with Ninject: Bind<ICustomPrincipal>().ToMethod(x => (ICustomPrincipal)HttpContext.Current.User) .InRequestScope(); So what's the best way to replace the GenericPrincipal? Thanks in advance, Pickels

    Read the article

  • remove dead routes in asp.net mvc 2

    - by loviji
    hello, i have get a problem. The request for 'Account' has found the following matching controllers: uqs.Controllers.Admin.AccountController MvcApplication1.Controllers.AccountController I search in project by Visual Studio MvcApplication1.Controllers.AccountController to remove it. but can't find match. So, I try to register a route: routes.MapRoute( "LogAccount", // Route name "{controller}/{action}/{id}", // URL with parameters new { controller = "AccountController", action = "LogOn", id = "" }, new string[] { "uqs.Controllers.Admin" } // Parameter defaults ); But can't solve problem. Multiple types were found that match the controller named 'Account'. How I can Remove MvcApplication1.Controllers.AccountController. or fix this problem? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Calling ASP.NET MVC Controller explicitly via AJAX

    - by effkay
    I know that I can use following piece of code to refresh a div: <%=Ajax.ActionLink( "Update", "Administration", new AjaxOptions { UpdateTargetId = "grid", LoadingElementId = "grid-wait" } ) %> But this creates a link; user will have to click on it to get the view refreshed. How can I make it automatic, i.e., like say if I want the grid to be refreshed after every five seconds?

    Read the article

  • Validation firing in ASP.NET MVC

    - by rkrauter
    I am lost on this MVC project I am working on. I also read Brad Wilsons article. http://bradwilson.typepad.com/blog/2010/01/input-validation-vs-model-validation-in-aspnet-mvc.html I have this: public class Employee { [Required] public int ID { get; set; } [Required] public string FirstName { get; set; } [Required] public string LastName { get; set; } } and these in a controller: public ActionResult Edit(int id) { var emp = GetEmployee(); return View(emp); } [HttpPost] public ActionResult Edit(int id, Employee empBack) { var emp = GetEmployee(); if (TryUpdateModel(emp,new string[] { "LastName"})) { Response.Write("success"); } return View(emp); } public Employee GetEmployee() { return new Employee { FirstName = "Tom", LastName = "Jim", ID = 3 }; } and my view has the following: <% using (Html.BeginForm()) {%> <%= Html.ValidationSummary() %> <fieldset> <legend>Fields</legend> <div class="editor-label"> <%= Html.LabelFor(model => model.FirstName) %> </div> <div class="editor-field"> <%= Html.DisplayFor(model => model.FirstName) %> </div> <div class="editor-label"> <%= Html.LabelFor(model => model.LastName) %> </div> <div class="editor-field"> <%= Html.TextBoxOrLabelFor(model => model.LastName, true)%> <%= Html.ValidationMessageFor(model => model.LastName) %> </div> <p> <input type="submit" value="Save" /> </p> </fieldset> <% } %> Note that the only field editable is the LastName. When I postback, I get back the original employee and try to update it with only the LastName property. But but I see on the page is the following error: •The FirstName field is required. This from what I understand, is because the TryUpdateModel failed. But why? I told it to update only the LastName property. I am using MVC2 RTM Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • Ajax comments form in ASP.NET MVC2, howto?

    - by Artiom Chilaru
    I've been playing around with different aspects of MVC for some time now, and I've reached a situation where I'm not sure what would be the best way to solve a problem. I'm hoping that the SO community will help me out here :P I've seen a number of examples of Ajax.BeginForm on the internet, and it seems like a very nifty idea. E.g. you have a dropdown where you select a customer - and on selecting one it will load this client's details in some placeholder on the page. This works perfectly fine. But what to do if you want to tie in some validation in the box? Just hypothetically, imagine an article page, and user comments in the bottom. Below the comments area there's an ajax-y "Add comment" box. When a user adds a comment, it will appear in the comments area, below the last comment there. If I set the Ajax.BeginForm to Append the result of the call to the Comments area, it will work fine. But what if the data posted is not valid? Instead of appending a "successful" comment to the comments area I have to show the user validation errors. At this point I decided that the area INSIDE the Ajax.BeginForm will be inside a partial, and the form's submits will return this partial. Validation works fine. On each submit we reload the contents inside the form element. But how to add the successful comment to the top? Other things to consider: The comment form also has a "Preview" button. When the user clicks on Preview, I should load the rendered comment into a preview box. This will probably be inside the form area as well. I was thinking of using Json results instead. When the user submits the form, the server code will generate a Json object with a Success value, and html rendered partials as some properties. Something like { "success": true, "form": "<html form data>", "comment": "successful comment html to inject into the page" } This would be a perfect solution, except there's no way in MVC to render a partial into a string, inside the controller (separation of context, remember?). So.. what should I do then? Any "correct" way to implement this? Anyone???

    Read the article

  • Correct way to perform an update using ADO.Net Entity Model in .net 4

    - by sf
    Hi, I just wanted to clarify if this is the appropriate way to perform an update using a designer generated ADO.NET Entity Model. I was wondering if there was a way to perform an update without creating the sqlMenu object. public class MenusRepository { public void UpdateMenu(Menu menu) { // _context is instantiated in constructor Menu sqlMenu = (from m in _context.Menus where m.MenuId == menu.MenuId select m).FirstOrDefault(); if (sqlMenu == null) throw new ArgumentException("Can't update a Menu which does not exist"); // associate values here sqlMenu.Name = menu.Name; _context.SaveChanges(); } }

    Read the article

  • How to use ASP .NET dropdown with ajax

    - by Poomjai
    Greeting, I'm beginer of ajax technology and now i need to create two dropdown in MVC project for example: First dropdown has the list of classroom [601,602,603] when i choose one then next dropdown will has the list of student belong to each class room. Now, I already create the repository class that has method GetStudentByClassroomName() and already connect to the database. Can anyone give me a suggestion how to create it or any technology to create the dropdown like this? Thank you very much ^_^

    Read the article

  • How do I insert data using a DetailsView into an access database without everything breaking?

    - by Steve
    Hey I'm getting the error: Data type mismatch in criteria expression. when I try to submit a DetailsView insert. Code for Default.aspx: (from inside an asp:Content tag) <asp:DetailsView ID="DetailsView1" runat="server" Height="50px" Width="125px" AutoGenerateRows="False" DataKeyNames="user_id" DataSourceID="AccessDataSource1" CellPadding="4" ForeColor="#333333" GridLines="None"> <FooterStyle BackColor="#5D7B9D" Font-Bold="True" ForeColor="White" /> <CommandRowStyle BackColor="#E2DED6" Font-Bold="True" /> <RowStyle BackColor="#F7F6F3" ForeColor="#333333" /> <FieldHeaderStyle BackColor="#E9ECF1" Font-Bold="True" /> <PagerStyle BackColor="#284775" ForeColor="White" HorizontalAlign="Center" /> <Fields> <asp:BoundField DataField="email" HeaderText="email" SortExpression="email" /> <asp:BoundField DataField="password" HeaderText="password" SortExpression="password" /> <asp:BoundField DataField="users_name" HeaderText="users_name" SortExpression="users_name" /> <asp:BoundField DataField="image_path" HeaderText="image_path" SortExpression="image_path" /> <asp:BoundField DataField="mobile" HeaderText="mobile" SortExpression="mobile" /> <asp:BoundField DataField="twitter" HeaderText="twitter" SortExpression="twitter" /> <asp:TemplateField HeaderText="privacy_level_id" SortExpression="privacy_level_id"> <InsertItemTemplate> <asp:DropDownList ID="DropDownList2" runat="server" DataSourceID="AccessDataSource2" DataTextField="privacy_level_name" DataValueField="privacy_level_id"> </asp:DropDownList> <asp:AccessDataSource ID="AccessDataSource2" runat="server" DataFile="~/App_Data/VisageFinal.mdb" SelectCommand="SELECT * FROM [PrivacyLevels]"></asp:AccessDataSource> </InsertItemTemplate> <ItemTemplate> <asp:Label ID="Label1" runat="server" Text='<%# Bind("date_of_birth") %>'></asp:Label> </ItemTemplate> </asp:TemplateField> <asp:TemplateField HeaderText="course_id" SortExpression="course_id"> <EditItemTemplate> <asp:DropDownList ID="DropDownList3" runat="server" DataSourceID="AccessDataSource3" DataTextField="course_name" DataValueField="course_id"> </asp:DropDownList> <asp:AccessDataSource ID="AccessDataSource3" runat="server" DataFile="~/App_Data/VisageFinal.mdb" SelectCommand="SELECT * FROM [Courses]"> </asp:AccessDataSource> </EditItemTemplate> <InsertItemTemplate> <asp:DropDownList ID="DropDownList22" runat="server" DataSourceID="AccessDataSource22" DataTextField="privacy_level_name" DataValueField="privacy_level_id"> </asp:DropDownList> <asp:AccessDataSource ID="AccessDataSource22" runat="server" DataFile="~/App_Data/VisageFinal.mdb" SelectCommand="SELECT * FROM [PrivacyLevels]"></asp:AccessDataSource> </InsertItemTemplate> <ItemTemplate> <asp:DropDownList ID="DropDownList3" runat="server" DataSourceID="AccessDataSource3" DataTextField="course_name" DataValueField="course_id" Enabled="False"> </asp:DropDownList> <asp:AccessDataSource ID="AccessDataSource3" runat="server" DataFile="~/App_Data/VisageFinal.mdb" SelectCommand="SELECT * FROM [Courses]"></asp:AccessDataSource> </ItemTemplate> </asp:TemplateField> <asp:TemplateField HeaderText="nationality_id" SortExpression="nationality_id"> <EditItemTemplate> <asp:DropDownList ID="DropDownList1" runat="server" DataSourceID="AccessDataSource20" DataTextField="nationality_name" DataValueField="nationality_id"> </asp:DropDownList> <asp:AccessDataSource ID="AccessDataSource20" runat="server" DataFile="~/App_Data/VisageFinal.mdb" SelectCommand="SELECT * FROM [Nationalities]"> </asp:AccessDataSource> </EditItemTemplate> <InsertItemTemplate> <asp:DropDownList ID="DropDownList1" runat="server" DataSourceID="AccessDataSource20" DataTextField="nationality_name" DataValueField="nationality_id"> </asp:DropDownList> <asp:AccessDataSource ID="AccessDataSource20" runat="server" DataFile="~/App_Data/VisageFinal.mdb" SelectCommand="SELECT * FROM [Nationalities]"> </asp:AccessDataSource> </InsertItemTemplate> <ItemTemplate> <asp:DropDownList ID="DropDownList1" runat="server" DataSourceID="AccessDataSource20" DataTextField="nationality_name" DataValueField="nationality_id" Enabled="False"> </asp:DropDownList> <asp:AccessDataSource ID="AccessDataSource20" runat="server" DataFile="~/App_Data/VisageFinal.mdb" SelectCommand="SELECT * FROM [Nationalities]"> </asp:AccessDataSource> </ItemTemplate> </asp:TemplateField> <asp:TemplateField HeaderText="residence_id" SortExpression="residence_id"> <EditItemTemplate> <asp:DropDownList ID="DropDownList4" runat="server" DataSourceID="AccessDataSource4" DataTextField="residence_name" DataValueField="residence_id"> </asp:DropDownList> <asp:AccessDataSource ID="AccessDataSource4" runat="server" DataFile="~/App_Data/VisageFinal.mdb" SelectCommand="SELECT * FROM [Residences]"></asp:AccessDataSource> </EditItemTemplate> <InsertItemTemplate> <asp:DropDownList ID="DropDownList4" runat="server" DataSourceID="AccessDataSource4" DataTextField="residence_name" DataValueField="residence_id"> </asp:DropDownList> <asp:AccessDataSource ID="AccessDataSource4" runat="server" DataFile="~/App_Data/VisageFinal.mdb" SelectCommand="SELECT * FROM [Residences]"></asp:AccessDataSource> </InsertItemTemplate> <ItemTemplate> <asp:DropDownList ID="DropDownList4" runat="server" DataSourceID="AccessDataSource4" DataTextField="residence_name" DataValueField="residence_id" Enabled="False"> </asp:DropDownList> <asp:AccessDataSource ID="AccessDataSource4" runat="server" DataFile="~/App_Data/VisageFinal.mdb" SelectCommand="SELECT * FROM [Residences]"></asp:AccessDataSource> </ItemTemplate> </asp:TemplateField> <asp:BoundField DataField="course_year" HeaderText="course_year" SortExpression="course_year" /> <asp:TemplateField HeaderText="gender_id" SortExpression="gender_id"> <EditItemTemplate> <asp:DropDownList ID="DropDownList5" runat="server" DataSourceID="AccessDataSource5" DataTextField="gender_name" DataValueField="gender_id"> </asp:DropDownList> <asp:AccessDataSource ID="AccessDataSource5" runat="server" DataFile="~/App_Data/VisageFinal.mdb" SelectCommand="SELECT * FROM [Genders]"></asp:AccessDataSource> </EditItemTemplate> <InsertItemTemplate> <asp:DropDownList ID="DropDownList5" runat="server" DataSourceID="AccessDataSource5" DataTextField="gender_name" DataValueField="gender_id"> </asp:DropDownList> <asp:AccessDataSource ID="AccessDataSource5" runat="server" DataFile="~/App_Data/VisageFinal.mdb" SelectCommand="SELECT * FROM [Genders]"></asp:AccessDataSource> </InsertItemTemplate> <ItemTemplate> <asp:DropDownList ID="DropDownList5" runat="server" DataSourceID="AccessDataSource5" DataTextField="gender_name" DataValueField="gender_id" Enabled="False"> </asp:DropDownList> <asp:AccessDataSource ID="AccessDataSource5" runat="server" DataFile="~/App_Data/VisageFinal.mdb" SelectCommand="SELECT * FROM [Genders]"></asp:AccessDataSource> </ItemTemplate> </asp:TemplateField> <asp:CommandField ShowInsertButton="True" InsertText="Create my user!" /> </Fields> <HeaderStyle BackColor="#5D7B9D" Font-Bold="True" ForeColor="White" /> <EditRowStyle BackColor="#999999" /> <AlternatingRowStyle BackColor="White" ForeColor="#284775" /> </asp:DetailsView> <asp:Button ID="Button1" runat="server" Text="Button" /> <asp:AccessDataSource ID="AccessDataSource1" runat="server" DataFile="~/App_Data/VisageFinal.mdb" DeleteCommand="DELETE FROM [Users] WHERE [user_id] = ?" InsertCommand="INSERT INTO [Users] ([email], [password], [users_name], [image_path], [mobile], [twitter], [privacy_level_id], [nationality_id], [course_id], [residence_id], [course_year], [gender_id]) VALUES ('?', '?', '?', '?', '?', '?', ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)" SelectCommand="SELECT * FROM [Users]" UpdateCommand="UPDATE [Users] SET [email] = ?, [password] = ?, [users_name] = ?, [date_of_birth] = ?, [image_path] = ?, [mobile] = ?, [twitter] = ?, [privacy_level_id] = ?, [nationality_id] = ?, [course_id] = ?, [residence_id] = ?, [has_set_privacy_level] = ?, [course_year] = ?, [gender_id] = ? WHERE [user_id] = ?"> <DeleteParameters> <asp:Parameter Name="user_id" Type="Int32" /> </DeleteParameters> <UpdateParameters> <asp:Parameter Name="email" Type="String" /> <asp:Parameter Name="password" Type="String" /> <asp:Parameter Name="users_name" Type="String" /> <asp:Parameter Name="image_path" Type="String" /> <asp:Parameter Name="mobile" Type="String" /> <asp:Parameter Name="twitter" Type="String" /> <asp:Parameter Name="privacy_level_id" Type="Int32" /> <asp:Parameter Name="nationality_id" Type="Int32" /> <asp:Parameter Name="course_id" Type="Int32" /> <asp:Parameter Name="residence_id" Type="Int32" /> <asp:Parameter Name="has_set_privacy_level" Type="Boolean" /> <asp:Parameter Name="course_year" Type="Int32" /> <asp:Parameter Name="gender_id" Type="Int32" /> <asp:Parameter Name="user_id" Type="Int32" /> </UpdateParameters> <InsertParameters> <asp:Parameter Name="email" Type="String" /> <asp:Parameter Name="password" Type="String" /> <asp:Parameter Name="users_name" Type="String" /> <asp:Parameter Name="image_path" Type="String" /> <asp:Parameter Name="mobile" Type="String" /> <asp:Parameter Name="twitter" Type="String" /> <asp:Parameter Name="privacy_level_id" Type="Int32" /> <asp:Parameter Name="nationality_id" Type="Int32" /> <asp:Parameter Name="course_id" Type="Int32" /> <asp:Parameter Name="residence_id" Type="Int32" /> <asp:Parameter Name="course_year" Type="Int32" /> <asp:Parameter Name="gender_id" Type="Int32" /> </InsertParameters> </asp:AccessDataSource> Any ideas what I've broken?

    Read the article

  • advise how to implement a code generator for asp.NET mvc 2

    - by loviji
    Hello, I would like your advice about how best to solve my problem. In a Web server is running. NET Framework 4.0. Whatever the methods and technologies you would advise me. applications built on the basis Asp.NET MVC 2. I have a database table in MS SQL Server. For each database, I must implement the interface for viewing, editing, and deleting. So code generator must generate model, controller and views.. Generation should happen after clicking on the button. as model I use .NET Entity Framework. Now, I need to generate controllers and views. So if i have a table with name tableN1. and below its colums: [ID] [bigint] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL, [name] [nvarchar 20] NOT NULL, [fullName] [nvarchar 50] NOT NULL, [age] [int] NOT NULL [active] [bit] NULL for this table, i want to generate views and controller. thanks.

    Read the article

  • Asp.Net MVC ActionLink

    - by Pino
    Can anyone explain why the following happens? And how to resolve, Visual Studio 2010 and MVC2 <%= Html.ActionLink("Add New Option", "AddOption", "Product", new { @class = "lighbox" }, null)%> Results in /Product/AddOption?class=lightbox <%= Html.ActionLink("Add New Option", "AddOption", "Product", new { @class = "lighbox" })%> Results in /Product/AddOption?Length=7 Thanks

    Read the article

  • Can I develop for .NET Framework 4 in Visual Studio 2008?

    - by Zack Peterson
    My ASP.NET application runs in IIS on my web server and uses Microsoft .NET Framework 4 Beta 2. (Its Application Pool is set to .NET Framework version .NET Framework v4.0.21006.) It gives this new error: A potentially dangerous Request.Form value was detected from the client... This is due to a breaking change in .NET 4. To revert to the behavior of the ASP.NET 2.0 request validation feature, I added the following setting in the Web.config file: <httpRuntime requestValidationMode="2.0" /> Now Visual Studio 2008 throws a compile-time error: The 'requestValidationMode' attribute is not declared. And I can no longer debug on my development machine using the ASP.NET Development Server that comes with Visual Studio. I need Visual Studio and its ASP.NET Development Server to recognize the new .NET Framework 4 requestValidationMode attribute. How can I debug my application in .NET 4? Must I switch from Visual Studio 2008 to Visual Studio 2010 Beta 2?

    Read the article

  • Working with images in asp.net MVC ViewMasterPage in design mode

    - by amit.codename13
    While designing a master page i am adding a number of images to it. I have an image tag inside the master page, <img src="../../Content/Images/img19.jpg" class="profileImage" /> When i run my app, the image doesn't show up in the browser because the src path in the page that browser gets is same as in the master page. ie. "../../Content/Images/img19.jpg" But it should have been "Content/Images/img19.jpg" If i correct the src path in master page as <img src="Content/Images/img19.jpg" class="profileImage" /> Then I can see the image in the browser but not in design mode. Any help is appreciated.

    Read the article

  • client side validation in ascx files (user controls) for asp.net mvc

    - by Sefer KILIÇ
    hi, I have a logOn forn in ascx files and I render it as partial. How I can add a clinet side validation to this form, have any idea ? My below code does not work <%= Html.ValidationSummary(true, "Giris basarisiz oldu. Lütfen hatalari düzeltip tekrar deneyin.") %> <% Html.EnableClientValidation(); %> <% using (Html.BeginForm("LogOnProcess", "Account")) { %> <div> <fieldset> <legend>Hesap Bilgileri</legend> <div class="editor-label"> <%= Html.LabelFor(m => m.UserName) %> </div> <div class="editor-field"> <%= Html.TextBoxFor(m => m.UserName) %> <%= Html.ValidationMessageFor(m => m.UserName) %> </div> <div class="editor-label"> <%= Html.LabelFor(m => m.Password) %> </div> <div class="editor-field"> <%= Html.PasswordFor(m => m.Password) %> <%= Html.ValidationMessageFor(m => m.Password) %> </div> <div class="editor-label"> <%= Html.CheckBoxFor(m => m.RememberMe) %> <%= Html.LabelFor(m => m.RememberMe) %> </div> <p> <input type="submit" value="Giris" /> </p> </fieldset> </div> <% } %>

    Read the article

  • asp.net mvc making delete usercontrol information passing on and off

    - by mazhar kaunain baig
    i am creating a generalize deleteusercontrol , my aim is that on the listing page where all the records are listed when the delete is pressed i want to display the acknowledgment on the same page up the list. I had little idea to do that q1) first of all where will i place my deleteusercontrol(in the shared folder?). q2) on and off the deleteusercontrol as the acknowledgment will not be there all the time how would i be doing that on delete press. i don't want to pass any data in the querystring. q3)how would i be passing the records list id and listname to the general deleteusercontrol as it would be same for all the listing

    Read the article

  • A potentially dangerous Request.Form value in MVC 2 & ASP.NET 4.0

    - by Veton
    When I trying to send form containing value with xml, I get HttpRequestValidationException: A potentially dangerous Request.Form value was detected from the client All approaches I found: <%@ Page ValidateRequest="false" %> in .aspx-file. <pages validateRequest="false" /> in web.config. [ValidateInput(false)] on controller's action. don't help me. Hope for any advice.

    Read the article

  • ASP MVC.Net 3 RC2 bug ?

    - by Jarek Waliszko
    Hello, so far I've been using ASP.Net 3 BETA. Everything was working fine till the update to RC2 version. Of course I've read ScottGu's article about RC2. My problem is following. Basically I have 2 controllers: public class DynamicPageController : Controller { public ActionResult Redirect(string resource, int? pageNumber, int? id) { } } public class SystemController : Controller { public ActionResult Index() { } } In the Globals.asax I have routes like this: public static void RegisterRoutes(RouteCollection routes) { routes.MapRoute( "SystemRoute", "System/{action}", new { controller = "System", action = "Index" } ); routes.MapRoute( "PageRoute", "{resource}/{id}/{pageNumber}", new { controller = "DynamicPage", action = "Redirect", resource = UrlParameter.Optional, pageNumber = UrlParameter.Optional, id = UrlParameter.Optional } ); } In the code, I have simple link creation: System.Web.Mvc.UrlHelper u = new System.Web.Mvc.UrlHelper(context); string url = u.Action("Index", "System"); and the url is "/my_app/System" in both versions (BETA and RC2) But the code below (the syntax is the same as above, only controller and action names are different): string url = u.Action("Redirect", "DynamicPage", new RouteValueDictionary(new { resource = "Home" })); gives url which is null in RC2. It should be (and in fact in BETA was) "/my_app/Home" Why ? Is it a bug ? How can I create url for my "DynamicPage" controller ? Regards BTW: From where can I now download ASP.Mvc BETA version along with ASP.Net Web Pages 1.0 installers ? Since RC2 announcement I have problems finding mentioned 2 installers. Normally I would upgrade my code but this issue described above makes me stay with BETA for a while, since I have no time for migration and testing everything now.

    Read the article

  • Asp.net mvc, entity framework, Poco - Architecture

    - by user1576228
    I have a "small" enterprise application, aspnet mvc 3 + entity framework with POCO entity and repository pattern. I structured the solution in 4 projects: POCO entities Domain model Services web application When the application performs a query on the database, use one of the services provided, the service uses the repository and the small classes, as a result I have some dynamic proxy objects that I would like to convert in my domain entities, before using them in mvc views, but I do not know how. Dovrebber be set as the translator? This approach is reasonable?

    Read the article

  • RavenDB Ids and ASP.NET MVC3 Routes

    - by goober
    Hey all, Just building a quick, simple site with MVC 3 RC2 and RavenDB to test some things out. I've been able to make a bunch of projects, but I'm curious as to how Html.ActionLink() handles a raven DB ID. My example: I have a Document called "reasons" (a reason for something, just text mostly), which has reason text and a list of links. I can add, remove, and do everything else fine via my repository. Below is the part of my razor view that lists each reason in a bulleted list, with an Edit link as the first text: @foreach(var Reason in ViewBag.ReasonsList) { <li>@Html.ActionLink("Edit", "Reasons", "Edit", new { id = Reason.Id }, null) @Reason.ReasonText</li> <ul> @foreach (var reasonlink in Reason.ReasonLinks) { <li><a href="@reasonlink.URL">@reasonlink.URL</a></li> } </ul> } The Problem This works fine, except for the edit link. While the values and code here appear to work directly (i.e the link is firing directly), RavenDB saves my document's ID as "reasons/1". So, when the URL happens and it passes the ID, the resulting route is "http://localhost:4976/Reasons/Edit/reasons/2". So, the ID is appended correctly, but MVC is interpreting it as its own route. Any suggestions on how I might be able to get around this? Do I need to create a special route to handle it or is there something else I can do?

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET MVC Catch All

    - by rkrauter
    The ignore route is defined like this: routes.IgnoreRoute("{resource}.axd/{*pathInfo}"); Why not routes.IgnoreRoute("{resource}.axd/{*}"); What is the significance of pathInfo? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET MVC - Alternative to Role Provider?

    - by ebb
    Hey there, I'm trying to avoid the use of the Role Provider and Membership Provider since its way too clumsy in my opinion, and therefore I'm trying to making my own "version" which is less clumsy and more manageable/flexible. Now is my question.. is there an alternative to the Role Provider which is decent? (I know that I can do custom Role provier, membership provider etc.) By more manageable/flexible I mean that I'm limited to use the Roles static class and not implement directly into my service layer which interact with the database context, instead I'm bound to use the Roles static class which has its own database context etc, also the table names is awful.. Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • ASP MVC - Routing Required?

    - by evo_9
    I've been reading up on MVC2 which came in VS2010 and it sounds pretty interesting. I'm actually in the middle of a large multi-tenant application project, and have just started coding the UI. I'm considering changing to MVC as I'm not that far along at this point. I have some questions about the Routing capabilities, namely are they required to use MVC or can I more or less ignore Routing? Or do I have to setup a default routing record that will make things work like standard ASPX (as far as routing alone is concerned)? The reason why I don't want to use Routing is because I've already defined a custom URL 'rewrite' mechanism of my own (which fires on session_start). In addition, I'm using jquery and opens-standards for the entire UI, and MVC's aspx overhead-free approach seems like a better fit based on how I've already started to build the application (I am not using viewstate at all, for example). I guess my big concern is whether the routing can be ignored, of if I will have to re-implement my custom URL rewriting to work with MVC, and if that's the case, how would I do that? As a new Routing routine, or stick with the session_start (if that's even possible?). Lastly, I don't want to use anything even remotely 'intelligent/readable' for the url - for a site like StackOverflow, the readability of the URL is a positive, but the opposite is true if it's not a public website like this one. In fact, it would seem to me that the more friendly MVC routing URL (which indirectly show method names) could pose a security risk on a private, non-public website app like I'm developing. For all these reasons I would love to use the lightweight aspects of MVC but skip the Routing entirely - is this possible?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35  | Next Page >