Search Results

Search found 1575 results on 63 pages for 'reflection'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 28/63 | < Previous Page | 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35  | Next Page >

  • How do I iterate over an Array field reflectively?

    - by kunjaan
    I have Class<? extends Object> class1 = obj.getClass(); Field[] fields = class1.getDeclaredFields(); for (Field aField : fields) { aField.setAccessible(true); if (!Modifier.isStatic(aField.getModifiers()) && Modifier.isPublic((aField.getModifiers()))) { if (aField.getType().isArray()) { for (?? vals : aField) { System.out.println(vals); } } } }

    Read the article

  • How can I pass a type as a parameter in scala?

    - by rsan
    I'm having a really hard time trying to figure out how can I store or pass a type in scala. What I want to achive is something like this: abstract class Foo( val theType : type ) object Foo{ case object Foo1 extends Foo(String) case object Foo2 extends Foo(Long) } So at some point I can do this: theFoo match{ case String => "Is a string" case Long => "Is a long" } and when obtaining the object being able to cast it: theFoo.asInstanceOf[Foo1.theType] Is this possible? If is possible, is a good aproach? What I'm trying to achieve ultimately is writing a pseudo schema for byte stream treatment. E.g if I have an schema Array(Foo1,Foo1,Foo2,Foo3,Foo1) I could parse Arrays of bytes that complain with that schema, if at some point I have a different stream of bytes I could just write a new schema Array(Foo3, Foo4, Foo5) without having to reimplement parsing logic. Regards,

    Read the article

  • Getting an argument list for a class method

    - by Chris T
    What I'd like is for this class class Car { public function __construct(Engine $engine, Make $make, Model $model) { // stuff } } Get an array that has the types needed to construct this car (Engine, Make, Model) in the order they are needed for the constructor. I'm using this for a Dependency Injection-esque thing I'm making.

    Read the article

  • Can I get parameter names/values procedurally from the currently executing function?

    - by Pwninstein
    I would like to do something like this: public MyFunction(int integerParameter, string stringParameter){ //Do this: LogParameters(); //Instead of this: //Log.Debug("integerParameter: " + integerParameter + // ", stringParameter: " + stringParameter); } public LogParameters(){ //Look up 1 level in the call stack (if possible), //Programmatically loop through the function's parameters/values //and log them to a file (with the function name as well). //If I can pass a MethodInfo instead of analyzing the call stack, great. } I'm not even sure what I want to do is possible, but it would be very nice to be able to automatically output parameter names/values at runtime to a file without explicitly writing the code to log them. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Missing MethodInfo for overloaded function with different return type

    - by Charvak
    I have a class defined as follows interface ITest { List<T> Find<T>(int i); } class Test: ITest { public T List<T> Find<T>(int i) { return default(T); } List<T> ITest.Find<T>(int i) { return null; } } When I use typeof(Test).GetMethods() (both with and without appropriate BindingFlags) I do not get the MethodInfo for ITest.Find function. What is the best way of getting the MethodInfo for the missing method? Thanks

    Read the article

  • How to make an unit test always pass?

    - by brain_damage
    Let's assume someone has to write a solution to a problem and I have to test his solution with some tests. Is it possible (maybe with reflections or something) his program to pass all my tests, but to have nothing in common with the real solution to the problem?

    Read the article

  • Get all Methods with a given return type

    - by Aren B
    Is this code wrong? It's just not returning anything: public IEnumerable<string> GetMethodsOfReturnType(Type cls, Type ret) { var methods = cls.GetMethods(BindingFlags.NonPublic); var retMethods = methods.Where(m => m.ReturnType.IsSubclassOf(ret)) .Select(m => m.Name); return retMethods; } It's returning an empty enumerator. Note: I'm calling it on a ASP.NET MVC Controller looking for ActionResults GetMethodsOfReturnType(typeof(ProductsController), typeof(ActionResult));

    Read the article

  • Banshee crashes consistently - is there a fix?

    - by user36334
    Since updating to ubuntu 11.10 I've had trouble with banshee. In particular when I run it I find that it crashes within an hour without fail. I get the following Unhandled Exception: System.Reflection.TargetInvocationException: Exception has been thrown by the target of an invocation. ---> System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object at Mono.Zeroconf.Providers.AvahiDBus.BrowseService.DisposeResolver () [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0 at Mono.Zeroconf.Providers.AvahiDBus.BrowseService.Dispose () [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0 at Mono.Zeroconf.Providers.AvahiDBus.ServiceBrowser.OnItemRemove (Int32 interface, Protocol protocol, System.String name, System.String type, System.String domain, LookupResultFlags flags) [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0 at (wrapper managed-to-native) System.Reflection.MonoMethod:InternalInvoke (System.Reflection.MonoMethod,object,object[],System.Exception&) at System.Reflection.MonoMethod.Invoke (System.Object obj, BindingFlags invokeAttr, System.Reflection.Binder binder, System.Object[] parameters, System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture) [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0 --- End of inner exception stack trace --- at System.Reflection.MonoMethod.Invoke (System.Object obj, BindingFlags invokeAttr, System.Reflection.Binder binder, System.Object[] parameters, System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture) [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0 at System.Reflection.MethodBase.Invoke (System.Object obj, System.Object[] parameters) [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0 at System.Delegate.DynamicInvokeImpl (System.Object[] args) [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0 at System.MulticastDelegate.DynamicInvokeImpl (System.Object[] args) [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0 at System.Delegate.DynamicInvoke (System.Object[] args) [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0 at NDesk.DBus.Connection.HandleSignal (NDesk.DBus.Message msg) [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0 at NDesk.DBus.Connection.DispatchSignals () [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0 at NDesk.DBus.Connection.Iterate () [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0 at Mono.Zeroconf.Providers.AvahiDBus.DBusManager.IterateThread (System.Object o) [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0 Does anyone else also have this problem?

    Read the article

  • Dependency Injection for Windows Phone 7

    - by Igor Zevaka
    I was trying to use Unity 2.0 beta 2 for Silverlight in my Windows Phone 7 project and I kept getting this crash: Microsoft.Practices.Unity.Silverlight.dll!Microsoft.Practices.ObjectBuilder2.DynamicMethodConstructorStrategy.DynamicMethodConstructorStrategy() + 0x1f bytes Microsoft.Practices.Unity.Silverlight.dll!Microsoft.Practices.ObjectBuilder2.DynamicMethodConstructorStrategy.DynamicMethodConstructorStrategy() + 0x1f bytes mscorlib.dll!System.Reflection.RuntimeConstructorInfo.InternalInvoke(System.Reflection.RuntimeConstructorInfo rtci = {System.Reflection.RuntimeConstructorInfo}, System.Reflection.BindingFlags invokeAttr = Default, System.Reflection.Binder binder = null, object parameters = {object[0]}, System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture = null, bool isBinderDefault = false, System.Reflection.Assembly caller = null, bool verifyAccess = true, ref System.Threading.StackCrawlMark stackMark = LookForMyCaller) mscorlib.dll!System.Reflection.RuntimeConstructorInfo.InternalInvoke(object obj = null, System.Reflection.BindingFlags invokeAttr = Default, System.Reflection.Binder binder = null, object[] parameters = {object[0]}, System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture = null, ref System.Threading.StackCrawlMark stackMark = LookForMyCaller) + 0x103 bytes mscorlib.dll!System.Activator.InternalCreateInstance(System.Type type = {Name = "DynamicMethodConstructorStrategy" FullName = "Microsoft.Practices.ObjectBuilder2.DynamicMethodConstructorStrategy"}, bool nonPublic = false, ref System.Threading.StackCrawlMark stackMark = LookForMyCaller) + 0xf0 bytes mscorlib.dll!System.Activator.CreateInstance() + 0xc bytes Microsoft.Practices.Unity.Silverlight.dll!Microsoft.Practices.ObjectBuilder2.StagedStrategyChain.AddNew(Microsoft.Practices.Unity.ObjectBuilder.UnityBuildStage stage = Creation) + 0x1d bytes Microsoft.Practices.Unity.Silverlight.dll!Microsoft.Practices.Unity.UnityDefaultStrategiesExtension.Initialize() + 0x6c bytes Microsoft.Practices.Unity.Silverlight.dll!Microsoft.Practices.Unity.UnityContainerExtension.InitializeExtension(Microsoft.Practices.Unity.ExtensionContext context = {Microsoft.Practices.Unity.UnityContainer.ExtensionContextImpl}) + 0x31 bytes Microsoft.Practices.Unity.Silverlight.dll!Microsoft.Practices.Unity.UnityContainer.AddExtension(Microsoft.Practices.Unity.UnityContainerExtension extension = {Microsoft.Practices.Unity.UnityDefaultStrategiesExtension}) + 0x1a bytes Microsoft.Practices.Unity.Silverlight.dll!Microsoft.Practices.Unity.UnityContainer.UnityContainer() + 0xf bytes Thinking I could resolve it I've tried a few things but to no avail. Turns out that this is a rather fundamental problem and my assumption that Windows Phone 7 is Silverlight 3 + Some other stuff is wrong. This page describes the differences between Mobile Silverlight and Silverlight 3. Of particular interest is this: The System.Reflection.Emit namespace is not supported in Silverlight for Windows Phone. This is precisely why Unity is crashing on the phone, DynamicMethodConstructorStrategy class uses System.Reflection.Emit quite extensively... So the question is, what alternative to Unity is there for Windows Phone 7?

    Read the article

  • C# Reflection: How to call method of interface without creating instance?

    - by jitm
    Hello, I have situation where I have to call method of interface using reflection, like this object x = null; MethodInfo method = interfaceExists.GetMethod("ShutDown"); method.Invoke(x, new object[] { 4 }) As you can see I do not create instance of object! And, as I can supposed, I receive exception Non-static method requires a target And Question, Can I call method of interface using reflection without creating instance of interface and if YES, How I can do it ? Thank you.

    Read the article

  • Nasty mono bug with F#

    - by Aurimas Anskaitis
    Hi, I have this monstrous f# 2.0 program My mono version is Mono JIT compiler version 2.9 (master/f593354 Sun Dec 26 03:15:55 EET 2010) Copyright (C) 2002-2010 Novell, Inc and Contributors. www.mono-project.com TLS: __thread SIGSEGV: altstack Notifications: epoll Architecture: x86 Disabled: none Misc: softdebug LLVM: supported, not enabled. GC: Included Boehm (with typed GC and Parallel Mark) //--------------------------------------------- module Main let rec gcd x y = if y = 0 then x else gcd y (x%y) let main = printfn "%i" (gcd 4 2) main //----------------------------------------------- And the problem is that output from running the program is as follows: Stacktrace: at (wrapper managed-to-native) System.Reflection.MonoMethodInfo.get_parameter_info (intptr,System.Reflection.MemberInfo) <0xffffffff at System.Reflection.MonoMethodInfo.GetParametersInfo (intptr,System.Reflection.MemberInfo) <0x00013 at System.Reflection.MonoCMethod.GetParameters () <0x00015 at System.Reflection.MonoCMethod.Invoke (object,System.Reflection.BindingFlags,System.Reflection.Binder,object[],System.Globalization.CultureInfo) <0x00035 at System.Reflection.MonoCMethod.Invoke (System.Reflection.BindingFlags,System.Reflection.Binder,object[],System.Globalization.CultureInfo) <0x00024 at System.Reflection.ConstructorInfo.Invoke (object[]) <0x0003f at System.Activator.CreateInstance (System.Type,bool) <0x0017c at System.Activator.CreateInstance (System.Type) <0x00012 at Microsoft.FSharp.Reflection.FSharpValue.MakeFunction (System.Type,Microsoft.FSharp.Core.FSharpFunc2<object, object>) <0x00145> at Microsoft.FSharp.Core.PrintfImpl.capture@529<b, c, d> (Microsoft.FSharp.Core.FSharpFunc2, Microsoft.FSharp.Core.FSharpFunc`2<char, Microsoft.FSharp.Core.Unit>, Microsoft.FSharp.Core.FSharpFunc`2,string,int,Microsoft.FSharp.Collections.FSharpList1<object>,System.Type,int) <0x00147> at Microsoft.FSharp.Core.PrintfImpl.gprintf<b, c, d, a> (Microsoft.FSharp.Core.FSharpFunc2, Microsoft.FSharp.Core.FSharpFunc`2<char, Microsoft.FSharp.Core.Unit>, Microsoft.FSharp.Core.FSharpFunc`2,Microsoft.FSharp.Core.PrintfFormat4<a, b, c, d>) <0x000dd> at Microsoft.FSharp.Core.PrintfModule.kprintf_imperative<a, b, c> (Microsoft.FSharp.Core.FSharpFunc2,b,Microsoft.FSharp.Core.FSharpFunc2<char, Microsoft.FSharp.Core.Unit>,Microsoft.FSharp.Core.PrintfFormat4) <0x00058 at Microsoft.FSharp.Core.PrintfModule.PrintFormatToTextWriterThen (Microsoft.FSharp.Core.FSharpFunc2<Microsoft.FSharp.Core.Unit, TResult>,System.IO.TextWriter,Microsoft.FSharp.Core.PrintfFormat4) <0x0004d at Microsoft.FSharp.Core.PrintfModule.PrintFormatLineToTextWriter (System.IO.TextWriter,Microsoft.FSharp.Core.PrintfFormat`4) <0x0004d at .$Main.main@ () <0x00042 Native stacktrace: mono() [0x80dc13b] mono() [0x811c65b] mono() [0x8059a11] [0x7af40c] mono() [0x8228214] mono() [0x8228214] mono() [0x8228214] mono() [0x8228214] mono() [0x8228214] mono() [0x8228214] mono() [0x8228214] mono() [0x8228214] mono() [0x8228282] mono() [0x822991e] mono() [0x822aa9d] mono(mono_array_new_specific+0xea) [0x813ba9a] mono() [0x81c63a1] mono() [0x8149ac8] [0xc04328] [0xc042e4] [0xc042be] [0xc0455e] [0xc0451d] [0xc044d8] [0xc0349d] [0xc0330b] [0xc02f9e] [0xbfe960] [0xbfe6c6] [0xbfe571] [0xbfe4de] [0xbfe44e] [0xbf9d2b] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] [0x9bf0724] Debug info from gdb: Could not attach to process. If your uid matches the uid of the target process, check the setting of /proc/sys/kernel/yama/ptrace_scope, or try again as the root user. For more details, see /etc/sysctl.d/10-ptrace.conf ptrace: Operation not permitted. ================================================================= Got a SIGSEGV while executing native code. This usually indicates a fatal error in the mono runtime or one of the native libraries used by your application. Aborted It is a huge problem with mono or f#? By the way, the same function works when using pattern matching instead of "if".

    Read the article

  • Breakout... Getting the ball reflection X angle when htitting paddle / bricks

    - by Steven Wilson
    Im currently creating a breakout clone for my first ever C# / XNA game. Currently Ive had little trouble creating the paddle object, ball object, and all the bricks. The issue im currently having is getting the ball to bounce off of the paddle and bricks correctly based off of where the ball touches the object. This is my forumala thus far: if (paddleLocation.Intersects(ballLocation)) { position.Y = paddleLocation.Y - texture.Height; motion.Y *= -1; // determine X motion.X = 1 - 2 * (ballLocation.X - paddleLocation.X) / (paddleLocation.Width / 2); } The problem is, the ball goes the opposite direction then its supposed to. When the ball hits the left side of the paddle, instead of bouncing back to the left, it bounces right, and vise versa. Does anyone know what the math equation is to fix this?

    Read the article

  • In C++, is it a reflection of poor software design if objects are deleted manually?

    - by grokus
    With the advent of smart pointers, is it a sign of poor design if I see objects are deleted? I'm seeing some software components in our product that people are still doing this. This practice strikes me as un-idiomatic, but I need to be sure this is the industry consensus. I'm not starting a crusade but it'd be nice to be prepared theory wise. Edit: legit uses of delete, Klaim mentioned the object pool use case. I agree. Bad examples of using delete, I am seeing many new's in constructor or start() and corresponding delete's in the destructor or stop(), why not use scoped_ptr? It makes the code cleaner.

    Read the article

  • .NET Weak Event Handlers – Part II

    - by João Angelo
    On the first part of this article I showed two possible ways to create weak event handlers. One using reflection and the other using a delegate. For this performance analysis we will further differentiate between creating a delegate by providing the type of the listener at compile time (Explicit Delegate) vs creating the delegate with the type of the listener being only obtained at runtime (Implicit Delegate). As expected, the performance between reflection/delegate differ significantly. With the reflection based approach, creating a weak event handler is just storing a MethodInfo reference while with the delegate based approach there is the need to create the delegate which will be invoked later. So, at creating the weak event handler reflection clearly wins, but what about when the handler is invoked. No surprises there, performing a call through reflection every time a handler is invoked is costly. In conclusion, if you want good performance when creating handlers that only sporadically get triggered use reflection, otherwise use the delegate based approach. The explicit delegate approach always wins against the implicit delegate, but I find the syntax for the latter much more intuitive. // Implicit delegate - The listener type is inferred at runtime from the handler parameter public static EventHandler WrapInDelegateCall(EventHandler handler); public static EventHandler<TArgs> WrapInDelegateCall<TArgs>(EventHandler<TArgs> handler) where TArgs : EventArgs; // Explicite delegate - TListener is the type that defines the handler public static EventHandler WrapInDelegateCall<TListener>(EventHandler handler); public static EventHandler<TArgs> WrapInDelegateCall<TArgs, TListener>(EventHandler<TArgs> handler) where TArgs : EventArgs;

    Read the article

  • Set property with reflection after Fluent Nhibernates automapping has occured?

    - by Marcus
    I have an abstract baseclass with a collection of details IList that is automapped with fnh. After it has been populated with the correct values i would like to set some properties with reflection on the my class that inherits the abstract baseclass. I have tried to accomplish this in the constructor of my abstract baseclass but obviously my Details collection is empty when the occurs so my question is, what is the recommended way of doing this?

    Read the article

  • How to tell a method has a varargs argument using reflection?

    - by Anthony Kong
    Here is a sample code package org.example; import java.lang.reflect.Method; class TestRef { public void testA(String ... a) { for (String i : a) { System.out.println(i); } } public static void main(String[] args){ Class testRefClass = TestRef.class; for (Method m: testRefClass.getMethods()) { if (m.getName() == "testA") { System.out.println(m); } } } } The output is public void org.example.TestRef.testA(java.lang.String[]) So the signature of the method is reported to take a array of String. Is there any mean in the reflection library I can tell that the method is originally declared to take a varargs?

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35  | Next Page >