Search Results

Search found 56780 results on 2272 pages for 'system design'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 28/2272 | < Previous Page | 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35  | Next Page >

  • Should interface only be used for behavior and not to show logical data grouped together?

    - by jags
    Should an interface only be used to specify certain behavior? Would it be wrong to use interface to group logically related data? To me it looks like we should not use interface to group logically related data as structure seems a better fit. A class may be used but class name should indicate something like DTO so that user gets the impression that class does not have any behavior. Please let me know if my assumption is correct. Also, are there any exceptions where interface can be used to group logically related data?

    Read the article

  • Create Levels using blender

    - by notrodash
    I am creating a game and I have a custom level format for levels in my game. I wanted to know if it is possible to create levels for that kinda format in Blender. My format is XML based and just declares the positions of certain objects. Online I have seen many people use Blender to create levels in their own custom format that blender can understand. How do i get blender to understand my format and use blender to create levels for my game?

    Read the article

  • Avoiding bloated Domain Objects

    - by djcredo
    We're trying to move data from our bloated Service layer into our Domain layer using a DDD approach. We currently have a lot of business logic in our services, which is spread out all over the place and doesn't benefit from inheritance. We have a central Domain class which is the focus of most of our work - a Trade. The Trade object will know how to price itself, how to estimate risk, validate itself, etc. We can then replace conditionals with polymorphism. Eg: SimpleTrade will price itself one way, but ComplexTrade will price itself another. However, we are worried that this will bloat the Trade class(s). It really should be in charge of its own processing but the class size is going to increase exponentially as more features are added. So we have choices: Put processing logic in Trade class. Processing logic is now polymorphic based on the type of the trade, but Trade class is now has multiple responsibilites (pricing, risk, etc) and is large Put processing logic into other class such as TradePricingService. No longer polymorphic with the Trade inheritance tree, but classes are smaller and easier to test. What would be the suggested approach?

    Read the article

  • System Requirement Checking

    - by gl3829
    I am working on a game and want to strengthen its requirement checking to ensure that it can run successfully. Therefore, I am looking for information on what is useful to check before starting the game. As a simple example, Why check for a specific amount of memory? Should I as a game developer ensure a minimum amount of memory? I feel this information is usually skipped in many books and resources but is critical to be able to deliver a game that will run on many machines. I would appreciate if you answered with what you check in the system, why you check it and if you have a good resource about it, please include. Just to be a bit more specific, I'm developing in Windows.

    Read the article

  • Domain Model and Querying

    - by Tyrsius
    I am new to DDD, having worked only in Transaction-Script apps with an anemic model, or just Big Balls of Mud, so please forgive any terminology I abuse. I am trying to understand the proper separation between the domain model and the repository. What is the proper way to construct a domain object that is coming from a database, assuming the (incredibly simplified) need to query for objects by status (returns enumerable), or by ID. Should a factory be building the objects, exposing methods for GetByStatus() and GetByID(), using a DIed repository? Should a repository be called directly, knowing how to build a domain model from the DTO? Should the domain model have a constructor for get by ID, using a DIed repoistory to load the initial state, using some other (?) method for the list? I am not really sure what the best way would be, and this question has an answer advocating each one (these are certainly mutuallu exclusive).

    Read the article

  • Emacs-like keybindings system-wide?

    - by kermit666
    Is there a way to set Emacs-like keyboard shortcuts (at least the subset mentioned below) for the whole OS? This is possible in some apps such as the terminal, Emacs (go figure :) and additionally through special plugins in some other apps (Eclipse), but I got so used to C-f-ing through text and never having to jump to arrows that I'd like to be able to do this system-wide so that I can do it whenever I'm typing - e.g. searching for songs in Rhythmbox, typing stuff into the dash or the HUD, writing mails in Thunderbird or Gmail... The combos I'm most interested in are: C-f - forward C-b - backwards C-a - home C-e - end C-d - delete C-k - delete line (note for non-emacs users - C means Ctrl)

    Read the article

  • How to decide to which class does a method belong

    - by Eleeist
    I have TopicBusiness.class and PostBusiness.class. I have no problem with deciding into which class methods such as addPostToDatabase() or getAllPostsFromDatabase() should go. But what about getAllPostsFromTopic(TopicEntity topic) or getNumberOfPostsInTopic(TopicEntity topic)? Should the parameter be the deciding factor? So when the method takes TopicEntity as parameter it should belong to TopicBusiness.class? I am quite puzzled by this.

    Read the article

  • Random generation of interesting puzzle levels?

    - by monsterfarm
    I'm making a Sokoban-like game i.e. there's a grid that has some crates on it you can push and you have to get the crates on crosses to win the level (although I'm going to add some extra elements to it). Are there any general algorithms or reading material I can look at for how I could go about generating interesting (as in, not trivial to solve) levels for this style of game? I'm aware that random level generators exist for Sokoban but I'm having trouble finding the algorithm descriptions. I'm interested in making a game where the machine can generate lots of levels for me, sorted by difficulty. I'm even willing to constrain the rules of the game to make the level generation easier (e.g. I'll probably limit the grid size to about 7x7). I suspect there are some general ways to do level generation here as I've seen e.g. Traffic Jam-like games (where you have to move blocks around the free some block) with 1000s of levels where each one has a unique solution. One idea I had was to generate a random map in its final state (i.e. where all crates are on top of their crosses) and then the computer would pull (instead of push) these crates around to create a level. The nice property here is that we know the level is solvable. However, I'd need some heuristics to ensure the level was interesting.

    Read the article

  • Is this a violation of the Liskov Substitution Principle?

    - by Paul T Davies
    Say we have a list of Task entities, and a ProjectTask sub type. Tasks can be closed at any time, except ProjectTasks which cannot be closed once they have a status of Started. The UI should ensure the option to close a started ProjectTask is never available, but some safeguards are present in the domain: public class Task { public Status Status { get; set; } public virtual void Close() { Status = Status.Closed; } } public ProjectTask : Task { public override void Close() { if (Status == Status.Started) throw new Exception("Cannot close a started Project Task"); base.Close(); } } Now when calling Close() on a Task, there is a chance the call will fail if it is a ProjectTask with the started status, when it wouldn't if it was a base Task. But this is the business requirements. It should fail. Can this be regarded as a violation?

    Read the article

  • How should I define my Java Objects?

    - by HonorGod
    I have a data grid where I sort of show the following information - All Guests Total Adults = 22 Total Children = 27 Confirmed Total Adults = 9 Total Children = 13 Country = Germany Total Adults = 5 Total Childres = 6 Friends Adults = 2 Children = 2 Relatives Adults = 3 Children = 4 Country = USA Total Adults = 4 Total Childres = 7 Friends Adults = 2 Children = 5 Relatives Adults = 2 Children = 2 Tentative Total Adults = 13 Total Children - 14 Country = Australia Total Adults = 7 Total Childres = 8 Friends Adults = 2 Children = 3 Relatives Adults = 5 Children = 5 Country = China Total Adults = 6 Total Childres = 6 Friends Adults = 2 Children = 4 Relatives Adults = 4 Children = 2 And in the database what I have is data at the lowest level which is Friends / Relatives and the corresponding countries set as a look-up value which in indirectly connected to another look-up that can tell me if they fall under confirmed or tentative. I guess my question is how do I layout my Java Object and perform the aggregations and give it back to the client. I am not sure if I am clear with my question, but feel free to comment so I can update the question accordingly.

    Read the article

  • How to separate and maintain customer specific code

    - by WYSIWYG
    I am implementing customer specific code and currently following simple approach like if (cusomterId == 23) do it. I want to separate out all the customer related code in separate place. But I have following problems. In code is in 1. Stored procs 2. Plain old classes. 3. Controllers 4. Views I came up with two solutions. First is to create table CustomerFunctionlity with columns CustomerId, FunctionalityName, method/Proc, inputs/outputs With this table I can simply check if exists, execute given function. Another way is creating a factory which returns customer related object for an interface. I am writting small end to end customer specific functionalities. How can I write maintenable code. Thanks

    Read the article

  • Is it better to return NULL or empty values from functions/methods where the return value is not present?

    - by P B
    I am looking for a recommendation here. I am struggling with whether it is better to return NULL or an empty value from a method when the return value is not present or cannot be determined. Take the following two methods as an examples: string ReverseString(string stringToReverse) // takes a string and reverses it. Person FindPerson(int personID) // finds a Person with a matching personID. In ReverseString(), I would say return an empty string because the return type is string, so the caller is expecting that. Also, this way, the caller would not have to check to see if a NULL was returned. In FindPerson(), returning NULL seems like a better fit. Regardless of whether or not NULL or an empty Person Object (new Person()) is returned the caller is going to have to check to see if the Person Object is NULL or empty before doing anything to it (like calling UpdateName()). So why not just return NULL here and then the caller only has to check for NULL. Does anyone else struggle with this? Any help or insight is appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Does C++ support subtyping?

    - by the_naive
    I know it might be a silly question to ask, but I didn't quite get an a absolute clear answer on this matter, so I thought I'd put it here. Does c++ support the subtyping in the sense that it fulfills Liskov's principle fully? I understand how parametric polymorphism, inclusion polymorphism(subclassing and overriding) work in c++ but I'm not entirely sure or understand if subtyping exists in the context of C++. Could you please explain?

    Read the article

  • Entity System and rendering

    - by hayer
    Okey, what I know so far; The entity contains a component(data-storage) which holds information like; - Texture/sprite - Shader - etc And then I have a renderer system which draws all this. But what I don't understand is how the renderer should be designed. Should I have one component for each "visual type". One component without shader, one with shader, etc? Just need some input on whats the "correct way" to do this. Tips and pitfalls to watch out for.

    Read the article

  • is it valid that a state machine can have more than one possible state for some transition?

    - by shankbond
    I have a requirement for a workflow which I am trying to model as a state machine, I see that there is more than one outcome of a given transition(or activity). Is it valid for a state machine to have more than one possible states, but only one state will be true at a given time? Note: This is my first attempt to model a state machine. Eg. might be: s1-t1-s2 s1-t1-s3 s1-t1-s4 where s1, s2, s3, s4 are states and t1 is transition/activity. A fictitious real world example might be: For a human, there can be two states: hungry, not hungry A basket can have only one item from: apple, orange. So, to model it we will have: hungry-pick from basket-apple found hungry-pick from basket-orange found apple found-eat-not hungry orange found-take juice out of it and then drink- not hungry

    Read the article

  • User Control as container at design time

    - by Luca
    I'm designing a simple expander control. I've derived from UserControl, drawn inner controls, built, run; all ok. Since an inner Control is a Panel, I'd like to use it as container at design time. Indeed I've used the attributes: [Designer(typeof(ExpanderControlDesigner))] [Designer("System.Windows.Forms.Design.ParentControlDesigner, System.Design", typeof(IDesigner))] Great I say. But it isn't... The result is that I can use it as container at design time but: The added controls go back the inner controls already embedded in the user control Even if I push to top a control added at design time, at runtime it is back again on controls embedded to the user control I cannot restrict the container area at design time into a Panel area What am I missing? Here is the code for completeness... why this snippet of code is not working? [Designer(typeof(ExpanderControlDesigner))] [Designer("System.Windows.Forms.Design.ParentControlDesigner, System.Design", typeof(IDesigner))] public partial class ExpanderControl : UserControl { public ExpanderControl() { InitializeComponent(); .... [System.Security.Permissions.PermissionSet(System.Security.Permissions.SecurityAction.Demand, Name = "FullTrust")] internal class ExpanderControlDesigner : ControlDesigner { private ExpanderControl MyControl; public override void Initialize(IComponent component) { base.Initialize(component); MyControl = (ExpanderControl)component; // Hook up events ISelectionService s = (ISelectionService)GetService(typeof(ISelectionService)); IComponentChangeService c = (IComponentChangeService)GetService(typeof(IComponentChangeService)); s.SelectionChanged += new EventHandler(OnSelectionChanged); c.ComponentRemoving += new ComponentEventHandler(OnComponentRemoving); } private void OnSelectionChanged(object sender, System.EventArgs e) { } private void OnComponentRemoving(object sender, ComponentEventArgs e) { } protected override void Dispose(bool disposing) { ISelectionService s = (ISelectionService)GetService(typeof(ISelectionService)); IComponentChangeService c = (IComponentChangeService)GetService(typeof(IComponentChangeService)); // Unhook events s.SelectionChanged -= new EventHandler(OnSelectionChanged); c.ComponentRemoving -= new ComponentEventHandler(OnComponentRemoving); base.Dispose(disposing); } public override System.ComponentModel.Design.DesignerVerbCollection Verbs { get { DesignerVerbCollection v = new DesignerVerbCollection(); v.Add(new DesignerVerb("&asd", new EventHandler(null))); return v; } } } I've found many resources (Interaction, designed, limited area), but nothing was usefull for being operative... Actually there is a trick, since System.Windows.Forms classes can be designed (as usual) and have a correct behavior at runtime (TabControl, for example).

    Read the article

  • Design and Implementation with Prototyping Methodology

    - by Shahin
    I'm developing a game for my dissertation, and I'm using the spiral method approach. I'm having a bit of difficulty structuring my dissertation, specifically the design and implementation section. My solution was designed as much as possible initially, and then after each prototype implementation, the design was refined and extended and prototyped again (this was repeated a few times). My problem is how to structure this in my dissertation, my current idea is: Design Chapter Prototype 1 (Initial) Design Prototype 2 Design Prototype 3 Design Implementation Chapter Prototype 1 (Initial) Implementation Prototype 2 Implementation Prototype 3 Implementation Any suggestions?

    Read the article

  • How to structure game states in an entity/component-based system

    - by Eva
    I'm making a game designed with the entity-component paradigm that uses systems to communicate between components as explained here. I've reached the point in my development that I need to add game states (such as paused, playing, level start, round start, game over, etc.), but I'm not sure how to do it with my framework. I've looked at this code example on game states which everyone seems to reference, but I don't think it fits with my framework. It seems to have each state handling its own drawing and updating. My framework has a SystemManager that handles all the updating using systems. For example, here's my RenderingSystem class: public class RenderingSystem extends GameSystem { private GameView gameView_; /** * Constructor * Creates a new RenderingSystem. * @param gameManager The game manager. Used to get the game components. */ public RenderingSystem(GameManager gameManager) { super(gameManager); } /** * Method: registerGameView * Registers gameView into the RenderingSystem. * @param gameView The game view registered. */ public void registerGameView(GameView gameView) { gameView_ = gameView; } /** * Method: triggerRender * Adds a repaint call to the event queue for the dirty rectangle. */ public void triggerRender() { Rectangle dirtyRect = new Rectangle(); for (GameObject object : getRenderableObjects()) { GraphicsComponent graphicsComponent = object.getComponent(GraphicsComponent.class); dirtyRect.add(graphicsComponent.getDirtyRect()); } gameView_.repaint(dirtyRect); } /** * Method: renderGameView * Renders the game objects onto the game view. * @param g The graphics object that draws the game objects. */ public void renderGameView(Graphics g) { for (GameObject object : getRenderableObjects()) { GraphicsComponent graphicsComponent = object.getComponent(GraphicsComponent.class); if (!graphicsComponent.isVisible()) continue; GraphicsComponent.Shape shape = graphicsComponent.getShape(); BoundsComponent boundsComponent = object.getComponent(BoundsComponent.class); Rectangle bounds = boundsComponent.getBounds(); g.setColor(graphicsComponent.getColor()); if (shape == GraphicsComponent.Shape.RECTANGULAR) { g.fill3DRect(bounds.x, bounds.y, bounds.width, bounds.height, true); } else if (shape == GraphicsComponent.Shape.CIRCULAR) { g.fillOval(bounds.x, bounds.y, bounds.width, bounds.height); } } } /** * Method: getRenderableObjects * @return The renderable game objects. */ private HashSet<GameObject> getRenderableObjects() { return gameManager.getGameObjectManager().getRelevantObjects( getClass()); } } Also all the updating in my game is event-driven. I don't have a loop like theirs that simply updates everything at the same time. I like my framework because it makes it easy to add new GameObjects, but doesn't have the problems some component-based designs encounter when communicating between components. I would hate to chuck it just to get pause to work. Is there a way I can add game states to my game without removing the entity-component design? Does the game state example actually fit my framework, and I'm just missing something? EDIT: I might not have explained my framework well enough. My components are just data. If I was coding in C++, they'd probably be structs. Here's an example of one: public class BoundsComponent implements GameComponent { /** * The position of the game object. */ private Point pos_; /** * The size of the game object. */ private Dimension size_; /** * Constructor * Creates a new BoundsComponent for a game object with initial position * initialPos and initial size initialSize. The position and size combine * to make up the bounds. * @param initialPos The initial position of the game object. * @param initialSize The initial size of the game object. */ public BoundsComponent(Point initialPos, Dimension initialSize) { pos_ = initialPos; size_ = initialSize; } /** * Method: getBounds * @return The bounds of the game object. */ public Rectangle getBounds() { return new Rectangle(pos_, size_); } /** * Method: setPos * Sets the position of the game object to newPos. * @param newPos The value to which the position of the game object is * set. */ public void setPos(Point newPos) { pos_ = newPos; } } My components do not communicate with each other. Systems handle inter-component communication. My systems also do not communicate with each other. They have separate functionality and can easily be kept separate. The MovementSystem doesn't need to know what the RenderingSystem is rendering to move the game objects correctly; it just need to set the right values on the components, so that when the RenderingSystem renders the game objects, it has accurate data. The game state could not be a system, because it needs to interact with the systems rather than the components. It's not setting data; it's determining which functions need to be called. A GameStateComponent wouldn't make sense because all the game objects share one game state. Components are what make up objects and each one is different for each different object. For example, the game objects cannot have the same bounds. They can have overlapping bounds, but if they share a BoundsComponent, they're really the same object. Hopefully, this explanation makes my framework less confusing.

    Read the article

  • Failed to install ntp via apt-get in Debian

    - by Petah
    When trying to install ntp (because my server clock is wrong), it just pukes this massive error. Any idea how to fix this? root@pan-prodweb01:~# apt-get install ntp Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done ntp is already the newest version. 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 75 not upgraded. 1 not fully installed or removed. After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? Y Setting up ntp (1:4.2.6.p2+dfsg-1+b1) ... insserv: warning: script 'S99obmaua' missing LSB tags and overrides insserv: warning: script 'S99obmscheduler' missing LSB tags and overrides insserv: warning: script 'obmscheduler' missing LSB tags and overrides insserv: warning: script 'obmaua' missing LSB tags and overrides insserv: There is a loop between service stop-bootlogd and mountnfs if started insserv: loop involving service mountnfs at depth 8 insserv: loop involving service nfs-common at depth 7 insserv: Starting obmaua depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmscheduler depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmaua depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmscheduler depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmaua depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmscheduler depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmaua depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmscheduler depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmaua depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmscheduler depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmaua depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmscheduler depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmaua depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmscheduler depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmaua depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmscheduler depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmaua depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmscheduler depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmaua depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmscheduler depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmaua depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmscheduler depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmaua depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmscheduler depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmaua depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmscheduler depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmaua depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmscheduler depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmaua depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmscheduler depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmaua depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmscheduler depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmaua depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmscheduler depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmaua depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmscheduler depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmaua depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmscheduler depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmaua depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmscheduler depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmaua depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmscheduler depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmaua depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmscheduler depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmaua depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmscheduler depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmaua depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmscheduler depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmaua depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmscheduler depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmaua depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmscheduler depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmaua depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmscheduler depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmaua depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmscheduler depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmaua depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmscheduler depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmaua depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmscheduler depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmaua depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmscheduler depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmaua depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmscheduler depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmaua depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmscheduler depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmaua depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmscheduler depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmaua depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$aconfigured to not write apport reports ll' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmscheduler depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmaua depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmscheduler depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmaua depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmscheduler depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmaua depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmscheduler depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmaua depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmscheduler depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmaua depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmscheduler depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmaua depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmscheduler depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmaua depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmscheduler depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmaua depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmscheduler depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmaua depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmscheduler depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmaua depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmscheduler depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmaua depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Starting obmscheduler depends on stop-bootlogd and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true! insserv: Max recursions depth 99 reached insserv: loop involving service tomcat6 at depth 9 insserv: There is a loop between service stop-bootlogd and mountall if started insserv: loop involving service mountall at depth 4 insserv: loop involving service checkfs at depth 3 insserv: loop involving service mountnfs-bootclean at depth 10 insserv: loop involving service networking at depth 6 insserv: There is a loop between service stop-bootlogd and checkroot if started insserv: loop involving service checkroot at depth 5 insserv: loop involving service hostname at depth 4 insserv: loop involving service kbd at depth 12 insserv: loop involving service module-init-tools at depth 6 insserv: There is a loop between service stop-bootlogd and mountoverflowtmp if started insserv: loop involving service mountoverflowtmp at depth 9 insserv: loop involving service mountall-bootclean at depth 8 insserv: There is a loop at service obmaua if started insserv: There is a loop between service obmaua and ifupdown-clean if started insserv: loop involving service ifupdown-clean at depth 6 insserv: There is a loop at service stop-bootlogd if started insserv: loop involving service obmaua at depth 1 insserv: loop involving service mtab at depth 7 insserv: exiting now without changing boot order! update-rc.d: error: insserv rejected the script header dpkg: error processing ntp (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: ntp localepurge: Disk space freed in /usr/share/locale: 0 KiB localepurge: Disk space freed in /usr/share/man: 0 KiB Total disk space freed by localepurge: 0 KiB E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

    Read the article

  • Entity Component System for HUD and GUI

    - by Jason L.
    This is a very rough sketch of how I currently have things designed. It should, at least, give an idea of how my ECS is currently designed. If you notice in that diagram, I have basically split the HUD out of the ECS. They have their own set of things (HudLayer, HudComponent, etc) and are handled differently. This is where I'm struggling, though. There are many different instances in which the HUD will need to know about entities. Not just data changing (I have an event dispatcher for that), but the actual entity and all it encompasses. There are also situations where entities will need to be able to query the HUD for data. Let's take a couple examples: First, my equipment screen. On here I can change the equipment on a character (Entity). In order for this to happen, I need to know about the entity. At least I think I do? How can I handle this? The second scenario involves my Systems needing to query a HudComponent for data. A specific example would be my battle system. Each "team" is given a 3x3 grid they can move around in. See here: Skills target these cells, and not the player, so I would need a way for my systems to determine which cells are occupied and which are not. Basically I need a way for two way communication between Systems and my HUD. I know it's recommended (by some people, anyways) to take your HUD out of the ECS. Is that appropriate in my case?

    Read the article

  • Stuck at the STARTUP [closed]

    - by Tarik Setia
    I started with "Getting started with asp mvc4 tutorial". I just created the project and when I pressed F5 I got this: Server Error in '/' Application. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Could not load type 'System.Web.WebPages.DisplayModes' from assembly 'System.Web.WebPages, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35'. Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code. Exception Details: System.TypeLoadException: Could not load type 'System.Web.WebPages.DisplayModes' from assembly 'System.Web.WebPages, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35'. Source Error: An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of the current web request. Information regarding the origin and location of the exception can be identified using the exception stack trace below. Stack Trace: [TypeLoadException: Could not load type 'System.Web.WebPages.DisplayModes' from assembly 'System.Web.WebPages, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35'.] System.Web.Mvc.VirtualPathProviderViewEngine.GetPath(ControllerContext controllerContext, String[] locations, String[] areaLocations, String locationsPropertyName, String name, String controllerName, String cacheKeyPrefix, Boolean useCache, String[]& searchedLocations) +0 System.Web.Mvc.VirtualPathProviderViewEngine.FindView(ControllerContext controllerContext, String viewName, String masterName, Boolean useCache) +315 System.Web.Mvc.c__DisplayClassc.b__a(IViewEngine e) +68 System.Web.Mvc.ViewEngineCollection.Find(Func`2 lookup, Boolean trackSearchedPaths) +182 System.Web.Mvc.ViewEngineCollection.Find(Func`2 cacheLocator, Func`2 locator) +67 System.Web.Mvc.ViewEngineCollection.FindView(ControllerContext controllerContext, String viewName, String masterName) +329 System.Web.Mvc.ViewResult.FindView(ControllerContext context) +135 System.Web.Mvc.ViewResultBase.ExecuteResult(ControllerContext context) +230 System.Web.Mvc.ControllerActionInvoker.InvokeActionResult(ControllerContext controllerContext, ActionResult actionResult) +39 System.Web.Mvc.c__DisplayClass1c.b__19() +74 System.Web.Mvc.ControllerActionInvoker.InvokeActionResultFilter(IResultFilter filter, ResultExecutingContext preContext, Func`1 continuation) +388 System.Web.Mvc.c__DisplayClass1e.b__1b() +72 System.Web.Mvc.ControllerActionInvoker.InvokeActionResultWithFilters(ControllerContext controllerContext, IList`1 filters, ActionResult actionResult) +303 System.Web.Mvc.ControllerActionInvoker.InvokeAction(ControllerContext controllerContext, String actionName) +844 System.Web.Mvc.Controller.ExecuteCore() +130 System.Web.Mvc.ControllerBase.Execute(RequestContext requestContext) +229 System.Web.Mvc.ControllerBase.System.Web.Mvc.IController.Execute(RequestContext requestContext) +39 System.Web.Mvc.c__DisplayClassb.b__5() +71 System.Web.Mvc.Async.c__DisplayClass1.b__0() +44 System.Web.Mvc.Async.c__DisplayClass8`1.b__7(IAsyncResult _) +42 System.Web.Mvc.Async.WrappedAsyncResult`1.End() +152 System.Web.Mvc.Async.AsyncResultWrapper.End(IAsyncResult asyncResult, Object tag) +59 System.Web.Mvc.Async.AsyncResultWrapper.End(IAsyncResult asyncResult, Object tag) +40 System.Web.Mvc.c__DisplayClasse.b__d() +75 System.Web.Mvc.SecurityUtil.b__0(Action f) +31 System.Web.Mvc.SecurityUtil.ProcessInApplicationTrust(Action action) +61 System.Web.Mvc.MvcHandler.EndProcessRequest(IAsyncResult asyncResult) +118 System.Web.Mvc.MvcHandler.System.Web.IHttpAsyncHandler.EndProcessRequest(IAsyncResult result) +38 System.Web.CallHandlerExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep.Execute() +10303829 System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(IExecutionStep step, Boolean& completedSynchronously) +178 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version Information: Microsoft .NET Framework Version:4.0.30319; ASP.NET Version:4.0.30319.17020

    Read the article

  • Color blindness: Are you aware of it? Do you design for it?

    - by User
    I'm curious whether many of us who do design or take design decisions have ever heard of this problem. I'm aware there are dangerous color combinations, like green + red. This is probably one of the most popular cases of color blindness. If you have green text on a red background and vice versa some people won't see anything. I've also seen in practice that green text on a blue background was not seen by one guy. What other color compositions should be avoided, and how often these cases are to be expected? Let us make some ranging by encounter probability who has the numbers. Addition: I've just remembered one very bad example that causes problems to just about everyone - blue text on a black background. It's unreadable for all intents and purposes. Never could understand what could possibly compel a web master to use this color combination...

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35  | Next Page >