Search Results

Search found 14548 results on 582 pages for 'const reference'.

Page 287/582 | < Previous Page | 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294  | Next Page >

• How to load an RSA key from binary data to an RSA structure using the OpenSSL C Library?

  - by Andreas Bonini

  Currently I have my private key saved in a file, private.key, and I use the following function to load it: RSA *r = PEM_read_RSAPrivateKey("private.key", NULL, NULL, NULL); This works perfectly but I'm not happy with the file-based format; I want to save my key in pure binary form (ie, no base64 or similar) in a char* variable and load/save the key from/to it. This way I have much more freedom: I'll be able to store the key directly into the application const char key[] { 0x01, 0x02, ... };, send it over a network socket, etc. Unfortunately though I haven't found a way to do that. The only way to save and load a key I know of reads/saves it to a file directly.

  Read the article

• Why won't C++ allow this default value

  - by nieldw

  Why won't GCC allow a default parameter here? template<class edgeDecor, class vertexDecor, bool dir> Graph<edgeDecor,int,dir> Graph<edgeDecor,vertexDecor,dir>::Dijkstra(vertex s, bool print = false) const { This is the output I get: graph.h:82: error: default argument given for parameter 2 of ‘Graph<edgeDecor, int, dir> Graph<edgeDecor, vertexDecor, dir>::Dijkstra(Vertex<edgeDecor, vertexDecor, dir>, bool)’ graph.h:36: error: after previous specification in ‘Graph<edgeDecor, int, dir> Graph<edgeDecor, vertexDecor, dir>::Dijkstra(Vertex<edgeDecor, vertexDecor, dir>, bool)’ Can anyone see why I'm getting this?

  Read the article

• how to open many files simultaneously for reading in c

  - by monkeyking

  I'm trying to port some of my c++ code into c. I have the following construct class reader{ private: FILE *fp; alot_of_data data;//updated by read_until() method public: reader(const char*filename) read_until(some conditional dependent on the contents of the file, and the arg supplied) } Im then instantiating hundreds of these object and iterate over them using several 'read_until()' for each file until allfiles is at eof. I'm failing to see any clever way to do this in c, the only solution I can come up with is making an array of FILE pointers, and do the same with all the private member data from my class. But this seems very messy, can I implement the functionality of my class as a function pointer, or anything better, I think I'm missing a fundamental design pattern? The files are way to big to have all in memory, so reading everything from every file is not feasible Thanks

  Read the article

• converting string to int in C++

  - by xbonez

  I am trying to convert a string I read in from a file to an int value so I can store it in an integer variable. This is what my code looks like: ifstream sin; sin.open("movie_output.txt"); string line; getline(sin,line); myMovie.setYear(atoi(line)); Over here, setYear is a mutator in the Movie class (myMovie is an object of Movie class) that looks like this: void Movie::setYear(unsigned int year) { year_ = year; } When I run the code, I get the following error: error C2664: 'atoi' : cannot convert parameter 1 from 'std::string' to 'const char *' 1> No user-defined-conversion operator available that can perform this conversion, or the operator cannot be called

  Read the article

• Does C# compile code inside an if(false) block?

  - by aximili

  I am just wondering if these code blocks gets compiled into .dll I don't think this one gets compiled at all #if SOMETHING_UNDEFINED // some code - this is ignored by the compiler #endif Now what about these? 1. if(false) { // some code - is this compiled? } 2. const bool F = false; if(F) { // some code - is this compiled? } 3. bool F = false; if(F) { // some code - is this compiled? }

  Read the article

• Multiple constructors definitions with same name but different signatures (C++)

  - by PuRe_ChAoS12

  With the following code, I keep getting error C2535 when I compile. It's complaining that a member function already defined or declared. Rationnel.h ... class Rationnel { public: Rationnel(int); //Constructor Rationnel(int,int); //Constructor void add(const Rationnel); ... Rationnel.cpp ... //Constructor Rationnel::Rationnel(int n = 1) { numerateur = n; denominateur = 1; } //Constructor Rationnel::Rationnel(int n = 1, int d = 1) { numerateur = n; denominateur = d; } ... Any idea what could be causing the error? Thanks for your time.

  Read the article

• Is there a standard literal constant that I can use instead of "utf-8" in C# (.Net 3.5)?

  - by Hamish Grubijan

  Hi, I would like to find a better way to do this: XmlNode nodeXML = xmlDoc.AppendChild( xmlDoc.CreateXmlDeclaration( "1.0", "utf-8", String.Empty) ); I do not want to think about "utf-8" vs "UTF-8" vs "UTF8" vs "utf8" as I type code. I would like to make my code less prone to typos. I am sure that some standard library has declatred "utf-8" as a const / readonly string. How can I find it? Also, what about "1.0"? I am assuming that major XML versions have been enumerated somewhere as well. Thanks!

  Read the article

• C++ initializing constants and inheritance

  - by pingvinus

  I want to initialize constant in child-class, instead of base class. And use it to get rid of dynamic memory allocation (I know array sizes already, and there will be a few child-classes with different constants). So I try: class A { public: const int x; A() : x(0) {} A(int x) : x(x) {} void f() { double y[this->x]; } }; class B : A { B() : A(2) {} }; Pretty simple, but compiler says: error C2057: expected constant expression How can I say to compiler, that it is really a constant?

  Read the article

• How return a std::string from C's "getcwd" function

  - by rubenvb

  Sorry to keep hammering on this, but I'm trying to learn :). Is this any good? And yes, I care about memory leaks. I can't find a decent way of preallocating the char*, because there simply seems to be no cross-platform way. const string getcwd() { char* a_cwd = getcwd(NULL,0); string s_cwd(a_cwd); free(a_cwd); return s_cwd; } UPDATE2: without Boost or Qt, the most common stuff can get long-winded (see accepted answer)

  Read the article

• Implementing implicitly shared classes outside of Qt

  - by Timothy Baldridge

  I'm familiar with the way Qt uses D-pointers for managing data. How do I do this in my code? I tried this method: 1) move all data into a struct 2) add a QAtomicInt to the struct 3) implement a = operator and change my constructor/deconstructor to check-up on the reference count. The issue is, when I go to do a shallow copy of the object, I get an error about QObject declaring = as private. How then do I accomplish this? Here's an example of my copy operator: HttpRequest & HttpRequest::operator=(const HttpRequest &other) { other.d->ref.ref(); if (!d->ref.deref()) delete d; d = other.d; return *this; } Am I going about this the wrong way?

  Read the article

• Operator() as a subscript (C++)

  - by Ivan Gromov

  I use operator() as a subscript operator this way: double CVector::operator() (int i) const { if (i >= 0 && i < this->size) return this->data[i]; else return 0; } double& CVector::operator() (int i) { return (this->data[i]); } It works when I get values, but I get an error when I try to write assign a value using a(i) = 1; UPD: Error text: Unhandled exception at 0x651cf54a (msvcr100d.dll) in CG.exe: 0xC0000005: Access violation reading location 0xccccccc0.

  Read the article

• strange results with /fp:fast

  - by martinus

  We have some code that looks like this: inline int calc_something(double x) { if (x > 0.0) { // do something return 1; } else { // do something else return 0; } } Unfortunately, when using the flag /fp:fast, we get calc_something(0)==1 so we are clearly taking the wrong code path. This only happens when we use the method at multiple points in our code with different parameters, so I think there is some fishy optimization going on here from the compiler (Microsoft Visual Studio 2008, SP1). Also, the above problem goes away when we change the interface to inline int calc_something(const double& x) { But I have no idea why this fixes the strange behaviour. Can anyone explane this behaviour? If I cannot understand what's going on we will have to remove the /fp:fastswitch, but this would make our application quite a bit slower.

  Read the article

• How can I require an attribute on a class definition?

  - by spoulson

  Is there a way to enforce a compile requirement for certain attributes on a class or interface implementation? For example, let's say my application uses a series of static classes that contain const int resource values. I'd like to decorate the class in a Description attribute to describe its contents. In concept, I'd like to apply this attribute requirement to an interface, then each static class would implement it with its required Description. I could write a run-time check or a unit test to check compliance. But really a compile-time check would be best. Is there such a thing?

  Read the article

• Multiplying complex with constant in C++

  - by Atilla Filiz

  The following code fails to compile #include <iostream> #include <cmath> #include <complex> using namespace std; int main(void) { const double b=3; complex <double> i(0, 1), comp; comp = b*i; comp=3*i; return 0; } with error: no match for ‘operator*’ in ‘3 * i’ What is wrong here, why cannot I multiply with immediate constants?

  Read the article

• CryptGenRandom to generate asp.net session id

  - by DoDo

  Hi! does anyone have working example of CryptGenrRandom class to generate session id (need to use in my iis module). HCRYPTPROV hCryptProv; BYTE pbData[16]; if(CryptAcquireContext( &hCryptProv, NULL, NULL, PROV_RSA_FULL, CRYPT_VERIFYCONTEXT)) { if(CryptGenRandom(hCryptProv, 8, pbData)) { std::string s(( const char *) pbData); printf(s.c_str()); } else { MyHandleError("Error during CryptGenRandom."); } } else { MyHandleError("Error during CryptAcquireContext!\n"); } i tried this code but, its not working quite well (i get it from msdn) and this example don't work for me ( http://www.codeproject.com/KB/security/plaintextsessionkey.aspx ) so if anyone know how to generate sessionid using this class plz let me know tnx anyway!

  Read the article

• Does a static object within a function introduce a potential race condition?

  - by Jeremy Friesner

  I'm curious about the following code: class MyClass { public: MyClass() : _myArray(new int[1024]) {} ~MyClass() {delete [] _myArray;} private: int * _myArray; }; // This function may be called by different threads in an unsynchronized manner void MyFunction() { static const MyClass _myClassObject; [...] } Is there a possible race condition in the above code? Specifically, is the compiler likely to generate code equivalent to the following, "behind the scenes"? void MyFunction() { static bool _myClassObjectInitialized = false; if (_myClassObjectInitialized == false) { _myClassObjectInitialized = true; _myClassObject.MyClass(); // call constructor to set up object } [...] } ... in which case, if two threads were to call MyFunction() nearly-simultaneously, then _myArray might get allocated twice, causing a memory leak? Or is this handled correctly somehow?

  Read the article

• Retain cycle on `self` with blocks

  - by Jonathan Sterling

  I'm afraid this question is pretty basic, but I think it's relevant to a lot of Objective-C programmers who are getting into blocks. What I've heard is that since blocks capture local variables referenced within them as const copies, using self within a block can result in a retain cycle, should that block be copied. So, we are supposed to use __block to force the block to deal directly with self instead of having it copied. __block typeof(self) bself = self; [someObject messageWithBlock:^{ [bself doSomething]; }]; instead of just [someObject messageWithBlock:^{ [self doSomething]; }]; What I'd like to know is the following: if this is true, is there a way that I can avoid the ugliness (aside from using GC)?

  Read the article

• Template class implicit copy constructor issues

  - by Nate

  Stepping through my program in gdb, line 108 returns right back to the calling function, and doesn't call the copy constructor in class A, like (I thought) it should: template <class S> class A{ //etc... A( const A & old ){ //do stuff... } //etc... }; template <class T> class B{ //etc... A<T> ReturnsAnA(){ A<T> result; // do some stuff with result return result; //line 108 } //etc... }; Any hints? I've banged my head against the wall about this for 4 hours now, and can't seem to come up with what's happening here.

  Read the article

• How to free an Oracle Object-Type passed to an external procedure

  - by chila

  I'm using OTT to pass and load an Object Type from a C++ external procedure. The problem I have is that I don't know how to somehow mark the object for deallocation once extproc has done marshalling it. The object remains in extproc's memory forever making it grow in memory consumtion. Here's part of the code: void decodeFromBuffer(OCIExtProcContext *ctx, GPRS_GPRSCHARGINGRECORD *record, GPRS_GPRSCHARGINGRECORD_ind *recordInd, const unsigned char *buffer, int buffLen, OCIInd *bufferInd) { . . . assert(OCIExtProcGetEnv(ctx, &envh, &svch, &errh) == OCI_SUCCESS); recordInd->_atomic = OCI_IND_NOTNULL; // somehow I should mark the object for deallocation after extproc has done marshalling it // using OCINumberFromInt and OCIStringAssignText to load the object (this memory is never deallocated) . . . } How could I mark the object (and subobjects) for deallocation?

  Read the article

• incorrect variable value outside main()

  - by cru3l

  i have this code #import <Foundation/Foundation.h> int testint; NSString *teststring; int Test() { NSLog(@"%d",testint); NSLog(@"%@",teststring); } int main (int argc, const char * argv[]) { NSAutoreleasePool * pool = [[NSAutoreleasePool alloc] init]; testint = 5; NSString *teststring = [[NSString alloc] initWithString:@"test string"]; Test(); [pool drain]; return 0; } in output i have: 5 (null) why Test function doesn't see correct teststring value? What should I do, to have correct "test string" in output?

  Read the article

• Accessing Password Protected Network Drives in Windows in C#?

  - by tkeE2036

  Hi Everyone, So in C# I am trying to access a file on a network, for example at "//applications/myapp/test.txt", as follows: const string fileLocation = @"//applications/myapp/test.txt"; using (StreamReader fin = new StreamReader(FileLocation)) { while(!fin.EndOfStream()){ //Do some cool stuff with file } } However I get the following error: System.IO.IOException : Logon failure: unknown user name or bad password. I figure its because I need to supply some network credentials but I'm not sure how to get those to work in this situation. Does anyone know the best way (or any way) to gain access to these files that are on a a password protected location? Thanks in advance!!

  Read the article

• the problem only happens when i try create a release...

  - by ace

  I'm sorry if im not presenting this right, but i trully cannot understand what the problem is. i have a project to hand in, a code of 600 lines defined within a main, .cpp, and header file. if i compile the project with just a debugger and no release, it's fine. when i create it with the release, the following error occurs, for every function!!! 1st error: |36|multiple definition of `countLines(int&, std::vector const&)'| 2nd error: |36|first defined here| if someone will allow me and i can send them the entire code, that would be awesome - i have to have this done within 3 hours.

  Read the article

• Creating ostream manipulators for a specific class

  - by petersohn

  I have a class that is derived from ostream: class my_ostream: public std::ostream { // ... } I want to make a manipulator (for example do_something), that works specifically to this class, like this: my_ostream s; s << "some text" << do_something << "some more text"; I did the following: std::ostream &do_something(std::ostream &os) { my_ostream *s = dynamic_cast<my_ostream*>(&os); if (s != NULL) { // do something } return os; } This works, but is rather ugly. I tried the following: my_ostream &do_something(my_ostream &s) { // do something return s; } This doesn't work. I also tried another approach: class my_ostream: public std::ostream { // ... my_ostream &operator<<(const do_something & x) { // do something return *this; } } This still doesn't work.

  Read the article

• setsockopt (sys/socket.h)

  - by lojin

  The prototype for setsockopt is: int setsockopt(int socket, int level, int option_name, const void *option_value, socklen_t option_len); Are the following all correct ? Which are not ? a.) int buffsize = 50000; setsockopt(s, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVBUF, (char *)&buffsize, sizeof(buffsize)); b.) int buffsize = 50000; setsockopt(s, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVBUF, (void *)&buffsize, sizeof(buffsize)); c.) char *buffsize = "50000"; setsockopt(s, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVBUF, buffsize, strlen(buffsize)); d.) setsockopt(s, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVBUF, "50000", 5);

  Read the article

• How do I use "this" in a member function?

  - by Peter Stewart

  I've written a member function of class Node to read a tree of Nodes in postfix order. It will be called by the Node instance which is the root node of the tree. So: N.postfix(); these appear to be illeagal: *this->left.postfix(); *this->right.postfix(); What is the proper way to do this? class Node { public: const char *cargo; int depth; Node *left; Node *right void Node::postfix() { if (this==__nullptr) { return; } else { *this->left.postfix(); *this->right.postfix(); out<<*this->cargo<<"\n"; return; } };

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294  | Next Page >