Search Results

Search found 3765 results on 151 pages for 'matthew lock'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 29/151 | < Previous Page | 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36  | Next Page >

  • Update errors on Xubuntu12.04

    - by Kris Everett
    I'm trying to install updates via the Update Manager, and I got this error: The Package system is broken Check if you are using third party repositories. if so disable them, since they are a common source of problems. Furthermore run the following command in a Terminal: apt-get install -f When I run apt-get install -f, I get: E: could not open lock file /var/lib/dpkg/lock - open (13: Permission Denied E: Unabvle to lock administration directory (/var/lib/dpkg/), are you root? What is wrong? How do I fix it? Why does this happen?

    Read the article

  • Ubuntu Software Center does not proceed from applying changes

    - by aneal
    I have a problem with Ubuntu software center. It is "Searching" and "applying changes" for long period of time. I tired to cancel by clicking cross(X) mark. However, it is now stuck at "cancelling". It won't let me download any new application even from terminal i guess. neal@neal-G50VT:~$ sudo apt-get install gnome-tweak-tool E: Could not get lock /var/lib/dpkg/lock - open (11: Resource temporarily unavailable) E: Unable to lock the administration directory (/var/lib/dpkg/), is another process using it? neal@neal-G50VT:~$ sudo dpkg --configure -a dpkg: error: dpkg status database is locked by another process There are similar question here, but with no answers: Software Center stuck for Dropbox Software Center freezes during “applying changes

    Read the article

  • Ubuntu boots into terminal

    - by DKuntz2
    When I turn on my computer (a CR-48), I keep loading tty1. I have tried xstart, and all I get is: Fatal server error: Could not create lock file in /tmp/.tX0-lock When I attempted to make the directory (both sudo and not), I received these two errors: sudo: Can't open /var/lib/sudo/don/tty2: Read-only file system (I've gotten other tty's for different virtual terminals) mkdir: cannot create directory '/tmp/tX0-lock': Read-only file system Before I got to the only terminal state, I had the computer moving a few files from a network server to the computer, I put it to sleep without stopping the transfers, and started the computer again away from my home network, and attempted to stop the transfers, the computer than restarted. Running sudo reboot puts me right back in the virtual terminal, and I can't get into any sort of x application.

    Read the article

  • Barrier implementation with mutex and condition variable

    - by kkp
    I would like to implement a barrier using mutex locks and conditional variables. Please let me know whether my implementation below is fine or not? static int counter = 0; static int Gen = 999; void* thread_run(void*) { pthread_mutex_lock(&lock); int g = Gen; if (++counter == nThreads) { counter = 0; Gen++; pthread_cond_broadcast(&cond_var); } else { while (Gen == g) pthread_cond_wait(&cond_var, &lock); } pthread_mutex_unlock(&lock); return NULL; }

    Read the article

  • Apache2 Enabling Includes module causes svn access to quit working

    - by Matthew Talbert
    I have dav_svn installed to provide http access to my svn repos. The url is directly under root, eg mywebsite.com/svn/individual-repo. This setup has been working great for some time. Now, I need SSI (server-side includes) for a project, so I enabled this module with a2enmod include. Now, tortoisesvn can't access the repo; it always returns a 301 permanent redirect. Some playing with it reveals I can access it in a browser if I'm sure to include the trailing / but it still doesn't work in TortoiseSVN. I've looked at all of the faq's for this problem with TortoiseSVN and apache, and none of them seem to apply to my problem. Anyone have any insight into this problem? I'm running Ubuntu 9.10 with Apache 2.2.12. The only change I've made to my configuration is to enable the includes mod. Here's my dav_svn conf: <Location /svn> DAV svn SVNParentPath /home/matthew/svn AuthType Basic AuthName "Subversion repository" AuthUserFile /etc/subversion/passwd Require valid-user </Location> and here's the relevant part of my virtual host conf: <Location /svn> SetHandler None Order allow,deny Allow from all </Location> Edit: OK, I've discovered that the real conflict is between the include module and basic authentication. That is, if I disable the include module, browse to the subversion repo, enter my user/pass for the basic authentication, I can browse it just fine. It even continues to work after I re-enable the include module. However, if I browse with another browser where I'm not already authenticated, then it no longer works.

    Read the article

  • centos dedicated Server unresponsive for the first time

    - by Ambrose Bwangatto
    server was unresponsive for an hour so i rebooted it and checked /var/log/messages and found this. can anybody point out whats wrong ? Sep 28 07:39:35 www kernel: INFO: task mysqld:22749 blocked for more than 120 seconds. Sep 28 07:39:35 www kernel: "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. Sep 28 07:39:35 www kernel: mysqld D ffff810001015120 0 22749 3266 22792 22659 (NOTLB) Sep 28 07:39:35 www kernel: ffff810139d21e58 0000000000000086 ffff810036217000 ffffffff8000f758 Sep 28 07:39:35 www kernel: ffff81020dfd1408 0000000000000007 ffff8101cfbaf7e0 ffff81020fca5080 Sep 28 07:39:35 www kernel: 00017a451524782a 00000000000043b2 ffff8101cfbaf9c8 0000000280009a22 Sep 28 07:39:35 www kernel: Call Trace: Sep 28 07:39:35 www kernel: [<ffffffff8000f758>] generic_permission+0x52/0xca Sep 28 07:39:35 www kernel: [<ffffffff80063c63>] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x60/0x9b Sep 28 07:39:35 www kernel: [<ffffffff8000cea2>] do_path_lookup+0x294/0x310 Sep 28 07:39:35 www kernel: [<ffffffff80063cad>] .text.lock.mutex+0xf/0x14 Sep 28 07:39:35 www kernel: [<ffffffff8003c618>] do_unlinkat+0x66/0x141 Sep 28 07:39:35 www kernel: [<ffffffff8005d229>] tracesys+0x71/0xe0 Sep 28 07:39:57 www kernel: [<ffffffff8005d28d>] tracesys+0xd5/0xe0 Sep 28 07:39:58 www kernel: Sep 28 07:39:59 www kernel: INFO: task httpd:22679 blocked for more than 120 seconds. Sep 28 07:40:04 www kernel: "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. Sep 28 07:40:08 www kernel: httpd D ffff81000100caa0 0 22679 22413 22680 22678 (NOTLB) Sep 28 07:40:51 www kernel: ffff81018b0dbc78 0000000000000086 ffff81018b0dbc88 0000004480063002 Sep 28 07:41:52 www kernel: ffff81000001cc00 0000000000000007 ffff81013ac5e860 ffff81020fc96100 Sep 28 07:43:10 www kernel: 00017a44de6376c8 000000000000a89f ffff81013ac5ea48 000000010001cc00 Sep 28 07:43:38 www kernel: Call Trace: Sep 28 07:44:06 www kernel: [<ffffffff80063c63>] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x60/0x9b Sep 28 07:44:09 www kernel: [<ffffffff80063cad>] .text.lock.mutex+0xf/0x14 Sep 28 07:44:10 www kernel: [<ffffffff8000d0b2>] do_lookup+0x90/0x1e6 Sep 28 07:44:13 www kernel: [<ffffffff8000a2e9>] __link_path_walk+0xa3a/0xfd1 Sep 28 07:44:16 www kernel: [<ffffffff8000eb8e>] link_path_walk+0x45/0xb8 Sep 28 07:44:16 www kernel: [<ffffffff8000cea2>] do_path_lookup+0x294/0x310 Sep 28 07:44:29 www kernel: [<ffffffff800129ad>] getname+0x15b/0x1c2 Sep 28 07:44:38 www kernel: [<ffffffff80023b60>] __user_walk_fd+0x37/0x4c Sep 28 07:44:42 www kernel: [<ffffffff80028ada>] vfs_stat_fd+0x1b/0x4a Sep 28 07:44:43 www kernel: [<ffffffff8003c69a>] do_unlinkat+0xe8/0x141 Sep 28 07:45:02 www kernel: [<ffffffff80023890>] sys_newstat+0x19/0x31 Sep 28 07:46:18 www kernel: [<ffffffff8005d229>] tracesys+0x71/0xe0 Sep 28 07:46:43 www kernel: [<ffffffff8005d28d>] tracesys+0xd5/0xe0 Sep 28 07:46:55 www kernel: Sep 28 07:46:58 www kernel: INFO: task php:28906 blocked for more than 120 seconds. Sep 28 07:46:59 www kernel: "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. Sep 28 07:47:00 www kernel: php D ffff810165127000 0 28906 28905 (NOTLB) Sep 28 07:47:37 www kernel: ffff810078431e58 0000000000000082 ffff810165127000 ffffffff8000f758 Sep 28 07:48:29 www kernel: ffff81020dfd1408 0000000000000007 ffff8101247b9860 ffff810207d0e100 Sep 28 07:48:36 www kernel: 00017a4218932fae 0000000000377111 ffff8101247b9a48 0000000280009a22 Sep 28 07:48:37 www kernel: Call Trace: Sep 28 07:48:37 www kernel: [<ffffffff8000f758>] generic_permission+0x52/0xca Sep 28 07:48:37 www kernel: [<ffffffff80063c63>] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x60/0x9b Sep 28 07:48:37 www kernel: [<ffffffff8000cea2>] do_path_lookup+0x294/0x310 Sep 28 07:48:41 www kernel: [<ffffffff80063cad>] .text.lock.mutex+0xf/0x14 Sep 28 07:48:41 www kernel: [<ffffffff8003c618>] do_unlinkat+0x66/0x141 Sep 28 07:48:42 www kernel: [<ffffffff8005d229>] tracesys+0x71/0xe0 Sep 28 07:48:42 www kernel: [<ffffffff8005d28d>] tracesys+0xd5/0xe0 Sep 28 07:48:42 www kernel: Sep 28 07:48:43 www kernel: INFO: task php:29032 blocked for more than 120 seconds. Sep 28 07:48:45 www kernel: "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. Sep 28 07:48:46 www kernel: php D 0000000000000004 0 29032 1 29050 29024 (NOTLB) Sep 28 07:48:46 www kernel: ffff81006b465dc8 0000000000000086 ffff81020dfd1408 ffffffff80009a22 Sep 28 07:48:46 www kernel: 0000000000000000 0000000000000007 ffff81002946e860 ffff81003c943100 Sep 28 07:48:46 www kernel: 00017a4211450766 000000000024be3d ffff81002946ea48 000000020e42b300 Sep 28 07:48:52 www kernel: Call Trace: Sep 28 07:48:54 www kernel: [<ffffffff80009a22>] __link_path_walk+0x173/0xfd1 Sep 28 07:48:54 www kernel: [<ffffffff8002cc58>] mntput_no_expire+0x19/0x89 Sep 28 07:48:55 www kernel: [<ffffffff8000ebf5>] link_path_walk+0xac/0xb8 Sep 28 07:48:55 www kernel: [<ffffffff80063c63>] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x60/0x9b Sep 28 07:48:55 www kernel: [<ffffffff80023974>] __path_lookup_intent_open+0x56/0x97 Sep 28 07:48:55 www kernel: [<ffffffff80063cad>] .text.lock.mutex+0xf/0x14 Sep 28 07:48:55 www kernel: [<ffffffff8001b260>] open_namei+0xea/0x718 Sep 28 07:48:59 www kernel: [<ffffffff80067235>] do_page_fault+0x4cc/0x842 Sep 28 07:49:01 www kernel: [<ffffffff80027726>] do_filp_open+0x1c/0x38 Sep 28 07:49:01 www kernel: [<ffffffff8001a09c>] do_sys_open+0x44/0xbe Sep 28 07:49:02 www kernel: [<ffffffff8005d28d>] tracesys+0xd5/0xe0 Sep 28 07:49:03 www kernel: Sep 28 07:49:07 www kernel: INFO: task mysqld:22749 blocked for more than 120 seconds. Sep 28 07:49:09 www kernel: "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. Sep 28 07:49:09 www kernel: mysqld D ffff810001015120 0 22749 3266 22792 22659 (NOTLB) Sep 28 07:49:14 www kernel: ffff810139d21e58 0000000000000086 ffff810036217000 ffffffff8000f758 Sep 28 07:49:14 www kernel: ffff81020dfd1408 0000000000000007 ffff8101cfbaf7e0 ffff81020fca5080 Sep 28 07:49:15 www kernel: 00017a451524782a 00000000000043b2 ffff8101cfbaf9c8 0000000280009a22 Sep 28 07:49:15 www kernel: Call Trace: Sep 28 07:49:22 www kernel: [<ffffffff8000f758>] generic_permission+0x52/0xca Sep 28 07:49:23 www kernel: [<ffffffff80063c63>] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x60/0x9b Sep 28 07:49:23 www kernel: [<ffffffff8000cea2>] do_path_lookup+0x294/0x310 Sep 28 07:49:23 www kernel: [<ffffffff80063cad>] .text.lock.mutex+0xf/0x14 Sep 28 07:49:23 www kernel: [<ffffffff8003c618>] do_unlinkat+0x66/0x141 Sep 28 07:49:23 www kernel: [<ffffffff8005d229>] tracesys+0x71/0xe0 Sep 28 07:49:23 www kernel: [<ffffffff8005d28d>] tracesys+0xd5/0xe0 Sep 28 07:49:23 www kernel: Sep 28 07:49:23 www kernel: INFO: task php:29024 blocked for more than 120 seconds. Sep 28 07:49:23 www kernel: "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. Sep 28 07:49:24 www kernel: php D ffff8101920a0000 0 29024 1 29032 29001 (NOTLB) Sep 28 07:49:26 www kernel: ffff8101cca8fe58 0000000000000086 ffff8101920a0000 ffffffff8000f758 Sep 28 07:49:26 www kernel: ffff81020dfd1408 0000000000000007 ffff81000b64b040 ffff8101e05337e0 Sep 28 07:49:26 www kernel: 00017a552aef9f35 0000000000009513 ffff81000b64b228 0000000180009a22 Sep 28 07:49:27 www kernel: Call Trace: Sep 28 07:49:27 www kernel: [<ffffffff8000f758>] generic_permission+0x52/0xca Sep 28 07:49:27 www kernel: [<ffffffff80063c63>] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x60/0x9b Sep 28 07:49:27 www kernel: [<ffffffff8000cea2>] do_path_lookup+0x294/0x310 Sep 28 07:49:27 www kernel: [<ffffffff80063cad>] .text.lock.mutex+0xf/0x14 Sep 28 07:49:27 www kernel: [<ffffffff8003c618>] do_unlinkat+0x66/0x141 Sep 28 07:49:27 www kernel: [<ffffffff8005d229>] tracesys+0x71/0xe0 Sep 28 07:49:27 www kernel: [<ffffffff8005d28d>] tracesys+0xd5/0xe0 Sep 28 07:49:27 www kernel: Sep 28 07:49:27 www kernel: INFO: task php:29050 blocked for more than 120 seconds. Sep 28 07:49:28 www kernel: "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. Sep 28 07:49:28 www kernel: php D ffff810201d95000 0 29050 1 29032 (NOTLB) Sep 28 07:49:28 www kernel: ffff810051e45e58 0000000000000086 ffff810201d95000 ffffffff8000f758 Sep 28 07:49:28 www kernel: ffff81020dfd1408 0000000000000007 ffff81001c23f080 ffff81020f5e2080 Sep 28 07:49:29 www kernel: 00017a5d0bc2aa75 0000000000d0ecfe ffff81001c23f268 0000000280009a22 Sep 28 07:49:29 www kernel: Call Trace: Sep 28 07:49:29 www kernel: [<ffffffff8000f758>] generic_permission+0x52/0xca Sep 28 07:49:29 www kernel: [<ffffffff80063c63>] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x60/0x9b Sep 28 07:49:29 www kernel: [<ffffffff8000cea2>] do_path_lookup+0x294/0x310 Sep 28 07:49:34 www kernel: [<ffffffff80063cad>] .text.lock.mutex+0xf/0x14 Sep 28 07:49:35 www kernel: [<ffffffff8003c618>] do_unlinkat+0x66/0x141 Sep 28 07:49:37 www kernel: [<ffffffff8005d229>] tracesys+0x71/0xe0 Sep 28 07:49:37 www kernel: [<ffffffff8005d28d>] tracesys+0xd5/0xe0 Sep 28 07:49:37 www kernel: Sep 28 07:49:37 www kernel: INFO: task php:29064 blocked for more than 120 seconds. Sep 28 07:49:37 www kernel: "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. Sep 28 07:49:37 www kernel: php D ffff81009c231000 0 29064 29057 (NOTLB) Sep 28 07:49:38 www kernel: ffff8100a5dc7e58 0000000000000086 ffff81009c231000 ffffffff8000f758 Sep 28 07:49:38 www kernel: ffff81020dfd1408 0000000000000007 ffff81000a850820 ffff8102038037a0 Sep 28 07:49:38 www kernel: 00017a5bb5c6846e 000000000000861a ffff81000a850a08 0000000080009a22 Sep 28 07:49:38 www kernel: Call Trace: Sep 28 07:49:38 www kernel: [<ffffffff8000f758>] generic_permission+0x52/0xca Sep 28 07:49:38 www kernel: [<ffffffff80063c63>] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x60/0x9b Sep 28 07:49:38 www kernel: [<ffffffff8000cea2>] do_path_lookup+0x294/0x310 Sep 28 07:49:38 www kernel: [<ffffffff80063cad>] .text.lock.mutex+0xf/0x14 Sep 28 07:49:38 www kernel: [<ffffffff8003c618>] do_unlinkat+0x66/0x141 Sep 28 07:49:38 www kernel: [<ffffffff8005d229>] tracesys+0x71/0xe0 Sep 28 07:49:40 www kernel: [<ffffffff8005d28d>] tracesys+0xd5/0xe0 Sep 28 07:49:42 www kernel: Sep 28 07:49:42 www kernel: INFO: task mysqld:24612 blocked for more than 120 seconds. Sep 28 07:49:43 www kernel: "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. Sep 28 07:49:46 www kernel: mysqld D ffff81020dfd14c0 0 24612 3266 19643 3599 (NOTLB) Sep 28 07:49:46 www kernel: ffff81019e517c78 0000000000000086 ffff81019e517c88 ffffffff80063002 Sep 28 07:49:47 www kernel: ffff810201966558 0000000000000009 ffff81015fa560c0 ffff8101c263b860 Sep 28 07:49:51 www kernel: 00017a9d113e27fe 0000000000008d5a ffff81015fa562a8 000000018006ec9f Sep 28 07:49:52 www kernel: Call Trace: Sep 28 07:49:52 www kernel: [<ffffffff80063002>] thread_return+0x62/0xfe Sep 28 07:49:52 www kernel: [<ffffffff8005a46a>] getnstimeofday+0x10/0x29 Sep 28 07:49:53 www kernel: [<ffffffff80063c63>] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x60/0x9b Sep 28 07:49:54 www kernel: [<ffffffff80063cad>] .text.lock.mutex+0xf/0x14 Sep 28 07:49:54 www kernel: [<ffffffff8000d0b2>] do_lookup+0x90/0x1e6 Sep 28 07:49:56 www kernel: [<ffffffff8000a2e9>] __link_path_walk+0xa3a/0xfd1 Sep 28 07:50:00 www kernel: [<ffffffff8000eb8e>] link_path_walk+0x45/0xb8 Sep 28 07:50:03 www kernel: [<ffffffff8000cea2>] do_path_lookup+0x294/0x310 Sep 28 07:50:04 www kernel: [<ffffffff800129ad>] getname+0x15b/0x1c2 Sep 28 07:50:06 www kernel: [<ffffffff80023b60>] __user_walk_fd+0x37/0x4c Sep 28 07:50:06 www kernel: [<ffffffff8003f013>] vfs_lstat_fd+0x18/0x47 Sep 28 07:50:08 www kernel: [<ffffffff8002ad91>] sys_newlstat+0x19/0x31 Sep 28 07:50:10 www kernel: [<ffffffff8005d229>] tracesys+0x71/0xe0 Sep 28 07:50:15 www kernel: [<ffffffff8005d28d>] tracesys+0xd5/0xe0 Sep 28 07:50:19 www kernel: Sep 28 07:50:19 www kernel: INFO: task php:29178 blocked for more than 120 seconds. Sep 28 07:50:23 www kernel: "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. Sep 28 07:50:23 www kernel: php D 0000000000000003 0 29178 29123 (NOTLB) Sep 28 07:50:23 www kernel: ffff81004a95bdc8 0000000000000086 ffff81020dfd1408 ffffffff80009a22 Sep 28 07:50:24 www kernel: ffffffff800a2fd0 0000000000000007 ffff8101937a4040 ffff81010bde27a0 Sep 28 07:50:26 www kernel: 00017aa3a1d89c9b 000000000000d66e ffff8101937a4228 000000020e42b300 Sep 28 07:50:26 www kernel: Call Trace: Sep 28 07:50:26 www kernel: [<ffffffff80009a22>] __link_path_walk+0x173/0xfd1 Sep 28 07:50:27 www kernel: [<ffffffff800a2fd0>] wake_bit_function+0x0/0x23 Sep 28 07:50:27 www kernel: [<ffffffff8002cc58>] mntput_no_expire+0x19/0x89 Sep 28 07:50:27 www kernel: [<ffffffff8000ebf5>] link_path_walk+0xac/0xb8 Sep 28 07:50:28 www kernel: [<ffffffff80063c63>] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x60/0x9b Sep 28 07:50:32 www kernel: [<ffffffff80023974>] __path_lookup_intent_open+0x56/0x97 Sep 28 07:50:32 www kernel: [<ffffffff80063cad>] .text.lock.mutex+0xf/0x14 Sep 28 07:50:34 www kernel: [<ffffffff8001b260>] open_namei+0xea/0x718 Sep 28 07:50:34 www kernel: [<ffffffff80067235>] do_page_fault+0x4cc/0x842 Sep 28 07:50:35 www kernel: [<ffffffff80027726>] do_filp_open+0x1c/0x38 Sep 28 07:50:35 www kernel: [<ffffffff8001a09c>] do_sys_open+0x44/0xbe Sep 28 07:50:35 www kernel: [<ffffffff8005d28d>] tracesys+0xd5/0xe0 Sep 28 07:50:35 www kernel: Sep 28 07:56:41 www kernel: proftpd invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x201d2, order=0, oomkilladj=0 Sep 28 07:56:41 www kernel: Sep 28 07:56:41 www kernel: Call Trace: Sep 28 07:56:41 www kernel: [<ffffffff800c9f35>] out_of_memory+0x8e/0x2f3 Sep 28 07:56:41 www kernel: [<ffffffff800a2fa2>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2e Sep 28 07:56:41 www kernel: [<ffffffff8000f67d>] __alloc_pages+0x27f/0x308 Sep 28 07:56:41 www kernel: [<ffffffff80013047>] __do_page_cache_readahead+0x96/0x17b Sep 28 07:56:41 www kernel: [<ffffffff80013984>] filemap_nopage+0x14c/0x360 Sep 28 07:56:41 www kernel: [<ffffffff80008972>] __handle_mm_fault+0x1fd/0x103b Sep 28 07:56:41 www kernel: [<ffffffff800a4fe1>] ktime_get_ts+0x1a/0x4e Sep 28 07:56:41 www kernel: [<ffffffff80067202>] do_page_fault+0x499/0x842 Sep 28 07:56:41 www kernel: [<ffffffff8003ad91>] hrtimer_try_to_cancel+0x4a/0x53 Sep 28 07:58:10 www kernel: [<ffffffff80033541>] do_setitimer+0xd0/0x689 Sep 28 08:26:22 www syslogd 1.4.1: restart. Sep 28 08:26:22 www kernel: klogd 1.4.1, log source = /proc/kmsg started. Sep 28 08:26:22 www kernel: Linux version 2.6.18-274.17.1.el5 ([email protected]) (gcc version 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-51)) #1 SMP Tue Jan 10 17:25:58 EST 2012 Sep 28 08:26:22 www kernel: Command line: ro root=LABEL=/

    Read the article

  • Crazy problem with Nginx, PHP5-FPM on Ubuntu

    - by Emmanuel
    I've been trying to get a domain from shared hosting to my new VPS. Everything was working just 100% fine, and then all of a sudden rewrites stopped working, pictures that should work started returning 404s. I've got no idea why, but for some reason on my site: http://www.onlythebible.com/ only the home page works, all the other pages depend on rewrites which were working perfectly fine at one stage, but all of a sudden stopped working. Some of the pictures like this url: http://www.onlythebible.com/bgsPreview/Matthew-8.10.jpg which doesn't use a rewrite throws a 404? I almost certain it was nothing to do with the nginx configuration. I've got suspicions that it could be something to do with php5-fpm? The funny thing is, all of a sudden it started working again. And then an hour or so later it broke again and has now gone back to only displaying the home-page and all of the links (and some of the pictures) are just showing 404s. Does anyone have an idea of what the problem might be? I'm pretty new to the whole Linux VPS thing, but this just seems very strange. *edit Here's a line from the error log which might shed some light on the problem: 2011/02/06 03:04:59 [error] 2873#0: *220 open() "/usr/local/nginx/html/bgsPreview/Matthew-8.10.jpg" failed (2: No such file or directory), client: 114.77.115.211, server: onlythebible.com, request: "GET /bgsPreview/Matthew-8.10.jpg HTTP/1.1", host: "www.onlythebible.com", referrer: "http://www.onlythebible.com/" I wonder why it's trying to find the file in /usr/local/nginx/html instead of the proper root which is /var/www/ etc... Oh, and for some reason it's just started working again... for how long I don't know. Another thing that was a bit weird, is that the pages on my website are pulled from a database. But when I edited the database, the pages didn't change... It's almost like they've been cached or something.

    Read the article

  • Don&rsquo;t Kill the Password

    - by Anthony Trudeau
    A week ago Mr. Honan from Wired.com penned an article on security he titled “Kill the Password: Why a String of Characters Can’t Protect Us Anymore.” He asserts that the password is not effective and a new solution is needed. Unfortunately, Mr. Honan was a victim of hacking. As a result he has a victim’s vendetta. His conclusion is ill conceived even though there are smatterings of truth and good advice. The password is a security barrier much like a lock on your door. In of itself it’s not guaranteeing protection. You can have a good password akin to a steel reinforced door with the best lock money can buy, or you can have a poor password like “password” which is like a sliding lock like on a bathroom stall. But, just like in the real world a lock isn’t always enough. You can have a lock, security system, video cameras, guard dogs, and even armed security guards; but none of that guarantees your protection. Even top secret government agencies can be breached by someone who is just that good (as dramatized in movies like Mission Impossible). And that’s the crux of it. There are real hackers out there that are that good. Killer coding ninja monkeys do exist! We still have locks on our doors, because they still serve their role. Passwords are no different. Security doesn’t end with the password. Most people would agree that stuffing your mattress with your life savings isn’t a good idea even if you have the best locks and security system. Most people agree its safest to have the money in a bank. Essentially this is compartmentalization. Compartmentalization extends to the online world as well. You’re at risk if your online banking accounts are linked to the same account as your social networks. This is especially true if you’re lackadaisical about linking those social networks to outside sources including apps. The object here is to minimize the damage that can be done. An attacker should not be able to get into your bank account, because they breached your Twitter account. It’s time to prioritize once you’ve compartmentalized. This simply means deciding how much security you want for the different compartments which I’ll call security zones. Social networking applications like Facebook provide a lot of security features. However, security features are almost always a compromise with privacy and convenience. It’s similar to an engineering adage, but in this case it’s security, convenience, and privacy – pick two. For example, you might use a safe instead of bank to store your money, because the convenience of having your money closer or the privacy of not having the bank records is more important than the added security. The following are lists of security do’s and don’ts (these aren’t meant to be exhaustive and each could be an article in of themselves): Security Do’s: Use strong passwords based on a phrase Use encryption whenever you can (e.g. HTTPS in Facebook) Use a firewall (and learn to use it properly) Configure security on your router (including port blocking) Keep your operating system patched Make routine backups of important files Realize that if you’re not paying for it, you’re the product Security Don’ts Link accounts if at all possible Reuse passwords across your security zones Use real answers for security questions (e.g. mother’s maiden name) Trust anything you download Ignore message boxes shown by your system or browser Forget to test your backups Share your primary email indiscriminately Only you can decide your comfort level between convenience, privacy, and security. Attackers are going to find exploits in software. Software is complex and depends on other software. The exploits are the responsibility of the software company. But your security is always your responsibility. Complete security is an illusion. But, there is plenty you can do to minimize the risk online just like you do in the physical world. Be safe and enjoy what the Internet has to offer. I expect passwords to be necessary just as long as locks.

    Read the article

  • SVN Error 403 Forbidden

    - by Chris
    I can't figure this out. I try to import a new project into a svn repository from Netbeans and get 403 Forbidden. I just setup svn on my serverbox today. I can get to it through a browser just fine, though its empty as I haven't imported my project yet. Apache's path for html files is /var/www I setup the svn repo in /var/svn This is the structure of /var/svn [root@localhost svn]# ls -lR /var/svn /var/svn: total 4 drwxrwxrwx 7 apache apache 4096 2010-03-26 10:18 repo /var/svn/repo: total 36 drwxrwxrwx 2 apache apache 4096 2010-03-26 09:47 conf drwxrwxrwx 3 apache apache 4096 2010-03-26 10:18 dav drwxrwsrwx 6 apache apache 4096 2010-03-26 11:19 db -rwxrwxrwx 1 apache apache 2 2010-03-26 09:47 format drwxrwxrwx 2 apache apache 4096 2010-03-26 09:47 hooks drwxrwxrwx 2 apache apache 4096 2010-03-26 09:47 locks -rwxrwxrwx 1 apache apache 229 2010-03-26 09:47 README.txt -rwxrwxrwx 1 apache apache 15 2010-03-26 09:47 svnauth -rwxrwxrwx 1 apache apache 43 2010-03-26 09:48 svnpass /var/svn/repo/conf: total 12 -rwxrwxrwx 1 apache apache 1080 2010-03-26 09:47 authz -rwxrwxrwx 1 apache apache 309 2010-03-26 09:47 passwd -rwxrwxrwx 1 apache apache 2279 2010-03-26 09:47 svnserve.conf /var/svn/repo/dav: total 4 drwxrwxrwx 2 apache apache 4096 2010-03-26 11:19 activities.d /var/svn/repo/dav/activities.d: total 0 /var/svn/repo/db: total 48 -rwxrwxrwx 1 apache apache 2 2010-03-26 09:47 current -rwxrwxrwx 1 apache apache 22 2010-03-26 09:47 format -rwxrwxrwx 1 apache apache 1920 2010-03-26 09:47 fsfs.conf -rwxrwxrwx 1 apache apache 5 2010-03-26 09:47 fs-type -rwxrwxrwx 1 apache apache 2 2010-03-26 09:47 min-unpacked-rev -rwxrwxrwx 1 apache apache 4096 2010-03-26 09:47 rep-cache.db drwxrwsrwx 3 apache apache 4096 2010-03-26 09:47 revprops drwxrwsrwx 3 apache apache 4096 2010-03-26 09:47 revs drwxrwsrwx 2 apache apache 4096 2010-03-26 11:19 transactions -rwxrwxrwx 1 apache apache 2 2010-03-26 11:19 txn-current -rwxrwxrwx 1 apache apache 0 2010-03-26 09:47 txn-current-lock drwxrwsrwx 2 apache apache 4096 2010-03-26 11:19 txn-protorevs -rwxrwxrwx 1 apache apache 37 2010-03-26 09:47 uuid -rwxrwxrwx 1 apache apache 0 2010-03-26 09:47 write-lock /var/svn/repo/db/revprops: total 4 drwxrwsrwx 2 apache apache 4096 2010-03-26 09:47 0 /var/svn/repo/db/revprops/0: total 4 -rwxrwxrwx 1 apache apache 50 2010-03-26 09:47 0 /var/svn/repo/db/revs: total 4 drwxrwsrwx 2 apache apache 4096 2010-03-26 09:47 0 /var/svn/repo/db/revs/0: total 4 -rwxrwxrwx 1 apache apache 115 2010-03-26 09:47 0 /var/svn/repo/db/transactions: total 0 /var/svn/repo/db/txn-protorevs: total 0 /var/svn/repo/hooks: total 36 -rwxrwxrwx 1 apache apache 1955 2010-03-26 09:47 post-commit.tmpl -rwxrwxrwx 1 apache apache 1638 2010-03-26 09:47 post-lock.tmpl -rwxrwxrwx 1 apache apache 2267 2010-03-26 09:47 post-revprop-change.tmpl -rwxrwxrwx 1 apache apache 1567 2010-03-26 09:47 post-unlock.tmpl -rwxrwxrwx 1 apache apache 3404 2010-03-26 09:47 pre-commit.tmpl -rwxrwxrwx 1 apache apache 2410 2010-03-26 09:47 pre-lock.tmpl -rwxrwxrwx 1 apache apache 2764 2010-03-26 09:47 pre-revprop-change.tmpl -rwxrwxrwx 1 apache apache 2100 2010-03-26 09:47 pre-unlock.tmpl -rwxrwxrwx 1 apache apache 2758 2010-03-26 09:47 start-commit.tmpl /var/svn/repo/locks: total 8 -rwxrwxrwx 1 apache apache 139 2010-03-26 09:47 db.lock -rwxrwxrwx 1 apache apache 139 2010-03-26 09:47 db-logs.lock I've got httpd.conf loading svn.conf which contains: <Location /svn> DAV on DAV svn #SVNParentPath /var/svn SVNPath /var/svn/repo Authtype Basic AuthName "Subversion" AuthUserFile /var/svn/repo/svnpass Require valid-user AuthzSVNAccessFile /var/svn/repo/svnauth </Location> Full error message is: org.tigris.subversion.javahl.ClientException: RA layer request failed Server sent unexpected return value (403 Forbidden) in response to CHECKOUT request for '/svn/!svn/bln/0' Sorry for the incredibly long post, but I thought more info would be better than less. I've been fidgeting with this problem for a long time now.

    Read the article

  • What is the correct way to synchronize a shared, static object in Java?

    - by johnrock
    This is a question concerning what is the proper way to synchronize a shared object in java. One caveat is that the object that I want to share must be accessed from static methods. My question is, If I synchronize on a static field, does that lock the class the field belongs to similar to the way a synchronized static method would? Or, will this only lock the field itself? In my specific example I am asking: Will calling PayloadService.getPayload() or PayloadService.setPayload() lock PayloadService.payload? Or will it lock the entire PayloadService class? public class PayloadService extends Service { private static PayloadDTO payload = new PayloadDTO(); public static void setPayload(PayloadDTO payload){ synchronized(PayloadService.payload){ PayloadService.payload = payload; } } public static PayloadDTO getPayload() { synchronized(PayloadService.payload){ return PayloadService.payload ; } } ... Is this a correct/acceptable approach ? In my example the PayloadService is a separate thread, updating the payload object at regular intervals - other threads need to call PayloadService.getPayload() at random intervals to get the latest data and I need to make sure that they don't lock the PayloadService from carrying out its timer task

    Read the article

  • NSIS takes ownership of IIS system files

    - by Lucas
    I recently encountered an issue with NSIS that I believe is related to an interaction with UAC, but I am at a loss to explain it and I do not know how to prevent it in the future. I have an installer that creates and removes IIS virtual directories using the NsisIIS plugin. The installer appeared worked correctly on my Windows 7 workstation. When the installer was run on a Windows 2008 R2 server it installed properly, but the uninstaller removed all of the virtual directories and put IIS is an unusable state; to the point that I had to remove the Default Web Site and re-add it. What I eventually found was that all of the IIS configuration files under C:\Windows\System32\inetsrv\config had a lock icon on them. Some investigation seem to indicate that this means a user account has taken ownership of the file, however all the files listed SYSTEM as the file owner. I did check a different server that I have not run the installer on, and it does not have the lock icon applied to the IIS files. I have also seen the same lock icon appear on other files that the NSIS installer creates. For instance, I have a Web.Config.tpl file that is processed using the NSIS ReplaceInFile which also appears with the lock icon after the installer finished. After I explicitly grant another user account access to the file, the lock icon goes away. I run the installer under the local Administrator account on the 2008 R2 server, so I do not get the UAC prompt. Here is the relevant code from the install.nsi file RequestExecutionLevel admin Section "Application" APP_SECTION SectionIn RO Call InstallApp SectionEnd Section "un.Uninstaller Section" Delete "$PROGRAMFILES\${PROGRAMFILESDIR}\Uninstall.exe" Call un.InstallApp SectionEnd Function InstallApp File /oname=Web.Config Web.Config.tpl !insertmacro ReplaceInFile Web.Config %CONNECTION_STRING% $CONNECTION_STRING FunctionEnd Function un.InstallApp ReadRegStr $0 HKLM "Software\${REGKEY}" "VirtualDir" NsisIIS::DeleteVDir "$0" Pop $0 FunctionEnd I have three questions stemming from this incident: How did this happen? How can I fix my installer to prevent it from happening again? How can I repair the permissions on the IIS config files.

    Read the article

  • Can Castle Monorail and ASP.NET MVC coexist in the same project?

    - by Matthew
    I have a large Monorail project that we have decided we are going to move over to ASP.NET MVC. Most of the underlying system will likely be reusable, but the Controllers will of course have to be rewritten, and proabably at least some of the views. It strikes me that a low risk avenue for this is gradually convert well defined sections of the system to MVC, and perhaps as MVCContrib Portable Areas. Does anyone know if there are any non-obvious gotchas that I am likely to run into with this approach? Thanks for your input, Matthew

    Read the article

  • Is there an Outlook or Gmail plugin to manage multiple tasks in an email?

    - by Matthew Lock
    I often get client emails containing 10 or more tasks written as text in the email. I know Outlook and Gmail let you turn an email into a single task, but this doesn't help too much when there are 10 tasks in that email. Are there any plugins for Outlook or Gmail that let put checkboxes into the email or something so I can check off each item as they are done? Ideally I'd like the checkboxes/to do items to be inside the email itself so I can see my progress by looking at the email, rather than just letting me copy text from the email into some other task list.

    Read the article

  • postfix- are these connects in the log anything to worry about?

    - by Lock
    I am noticing the following in my maillog. Lots of these: Sep 10 10:29:56 westc01-01-01 postfix/smtpd[26788]: connect from unknown[85.111.7.182] And these: Sep 10 10:34:58 westc01-01-01 postfix/smtpd[26768]: disconnect from unknown[85.111.7.182] Sep 10 10:34:58 westc01-01-01 postfix/smtpd[26758]: timeout after AUTH from unknown[85.111.7.182] And these: Sep 10 10:29:56 westc01-01-01 postfix/smtpd[26737]: warning: unknown[85.111.7.182]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6 Are these anything to worry about?

    Read the article

  • Printing to a remote printer through the internet

    - by Lock
    I have a remote network (A) that is connected to a head office (B) through a private network. Network A only has 1 PC that requires the connection, and this is into a terminal server at network B. We want to save money by getting rid of the private network as only 1 PC now access it and it seems silly to pay ~$400 per month for something that is accessed by 1 PC. A VPN tunnel is out of the question as the provider wants to charge $600 a month for a VPN tunnel (more than a private network? I might get them to check these numbers). I was thinking of 2 options: 1) VPN client on the PC. This wouldn't cost a thing as we already have VPN users available. 2) Open up a port on the firewall of network B, forwarding to the terminal server. Now the problem is this: On the terminal server, the program that is accessed is for printing labels to the printer that is at network A. The program is setup to send all print jobs to a printer that is setup locally on the terminal server, which has its port mapped to the IP address of the printer that is at network A. If we got rid of the VPN tunnel and used clients/open up firewall port, the printer would no longer be able to find network A, and hence printing would not work. Any ideas to combat this issue? Can the printers at the remote network be setup as internet printers? I've never had any experience with internet printers. Can you open up ports and map to a public static IP address?

    Read the article

  • Problem with From field in contact form and mail() function

    - by Matthew
    I've got a contact form with 3 fields and a textarea... I use jQuery to validate it and then php to send emails. This contact form works fine but, when I receive an email, From field isn't correct. I'd like to want that From field shows text typed in the Name field of the contact form. Now I get a From field like this: <[email protected]> For example, if an user types "Matthew" in the name field, I'd like to want that this word "Matthew" appears in the From field. This is my code (XHTML, jQuery, PHP): <div id="contact"> <h3 id="formHeader">Send Us a Message!</h3> <form id="contactForm" method="post" action=""> <div id="risposta"></div> <!-- End Risposta Div --> <span>Name:</span> <input type="text" id="formName" value="" /><br /> <span>E-mail:</span> <input type="text" id="formEmail" value="" /><br /> <span>Subject:</span> <input type="text" id="formSubject" value="" /><br /> <span>Message:</span> <textarea id="formMessage" rows="9" cols="20"></textarea><br /> <input type="submit" id="formSend" value="Send" /> </form> </div> <script type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function(){ $("#formSend").click(function(){ var valid = ''; var nome = $("#formName").val(); var mail = $("#formEmail").val(); var oggetto = $("#formSubject").val(); var messaggio = $("#formMessage").val(); if (nome.length<1) { valid += '<span>Name field empty.</span><br />'; } if (!mail.match(/^([a-z0-9._-]+@[a-z0-9._-]+\.[a-z]{2,4}$)/i)) { valid += '<span>Email not valid or empty field.</span><br />'; } if (oggetto.length<1) { valid += '<span>Subject field empty.</span><br />'; } if (valid!='') { $("#risposta").fadeIn("slow"); $("#risposta").html("<span><b>Error:</b></span><br />"+valid); $("#risposta").css("background-color","#ffc0c0"); } else { var datastr ='nome=' + nome + '&mail=' + mail + '&oggetto=' + oggetto + '&messaggio=' + encodeURIComponent(messaggio); $("#risposta").css("display", "block"); $("#risposta").css("background-color","#FFFFA0"); $("#risposta").html("<span>Sending message...</span>"); $("#risposta").fadeIn("slow"); setTimeout("send('"+datastr+"')",2000); } return false; }); }); function send(datastr){ $.ajax({ type: "POST", url: "contactForm.php", data: datastr, cache: false, success: function(html) { $("#risposta").fadeIn("slow"); $("#risposta").html('<span>Message successfully sent.</span>'); $("#risposta").css("background-color","#e1ffc0"); setTimeout('$("#risposta").fadeOut("slow")',2000); } }); } </script> <?php $mail = $_POST['mail']; $nome = $_POST['nome']; $oggetto = $_POST['oggetto']; $text = $_POST['messaggio']; $ip = $_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR']; $to = "[email protected]"; $message = $text."<br /><br />IP: ".$ip."<br />"; $headers = "From: $nome \n"; $headers .= "Reply-To: $mail \n"; $headers .= "MIME-Version: 1.0 \n"; $headers .= "Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 \n"; mail($to, $oggetto, $message, $headers); ?>

    Read the article

  • How to implement Session timeout in Web Server Side?

    - by Morgan Cheng
    I beheld a web framework implementing in-memory session in this way. The session object is added to Cache with timeout. When the time is out, the session is removed from Cache automatically. To protect race condition, each request should acquire lock on given session object to proceed. Each request will "touch" the session in Cache to refresh the timeout. Everything looks fine, until this scenario is discovered. Say, one operation takes a long time, longer than timeout. Another request comes and wait on session lock which is currently hold by the long-time request. Finally, the long-time request is over, it releases the lock. But, since it already takes longer time than timeout, the session object is already removed from Cache. This is obvious because the only request holding the lock doesn't have a chance to "touch" the session object in cache. The second request gets the lock but cannot retrieve the expired Session object. Oops... To fix this issue, the second request has to re-create the Session object. But, this is just like digging a buried dead body from tomb and try to bring it back to life. It causes buggy code. I'm wondering what's the best way to implement timeout in session to handle such scenario. I know that current platform must have good session mechanism. I just want to know the under-the-hood how.

    Read the article

  • Using boost locks for RAII access to a semaphore

    - by dan
    Suppose I write a C++ semaphore class with an interface that models the boost Lockable concept (i.e. lock(); unlock(); try_lock(); etc.). Is it safe/recommended to use boost locks for RAII access to such an object? In other words, do boost locks (and/or other related parts of the boost thread library) assume that the Lockable concept will only be modeled by mutex-like objects which are locked and unlocked from the same thread? My guess is that it should be OK to use a semaphore as a model for Lockable. I've browsed through some of the boost source and it "seems" OK. The locks don't appear to store explicit references to this_thread or anything like that. Moreover, the Lockable concept doesn't have any function like whichThreadOwnsMe(). It also looks like I should even be able to pass a boost::unique_lock<MySemaphore> reference to boost::condition_variable_any::wait. However, the documentation is not explicitly clear about the requirements. To illustrate what I mean, consider a bare-bones binary semaphore class along these lines: class MySemaphore{ bool locked; boost::mutex mx; boost::condition_variable cv; public: void lock(){ boost::unique_lock<boost::mutex> lck(mx); while(locked) cv.wait(lck); locked=true; } void unlock(){ { boost::lock_guard<boost::mutex> lck(mx); if(!locked) error(); locked=false; } cv.notify_one(); } // bool try_lock(); void error(); etc. } Now suppose that somewhere, either on an object or globally, I have MySemaphore sem; I want to lock and unlock it using RAII. Also I want to be able to "pass" ownership of the lock from one thread to another. For example, in one thread I execute void doTask() { boost::unique_lock<MySemaphore> lock(sem); doSomeWorkWithSharedObject(); signalToSecondThread(); waitForSignalAck(); lock.release(); } While another thread is executing something like { waitForSignalFromFirstThread(); ackSignal(); boost::unique_lock<MySemaphore>(sem,boost::adopt_lock_t()); doMoreWorkWithSameSharedObject(); } The reason I am doing this is that I don't want anyone else to be able to get the lock on sem in between the time that the first thread executes doSomeWorkWithSharedObject() and the time the second executes doMoreWorkWithSameSharedObject(). Basically, I'm splitting one task into two parts. And the reason I'm splitting the task up is because (1) I want the first part of the task to get started as soon as possible, (2) I want to guarantee that the first part is complete before doTask() returns, and (3) I want the second, more time-consuming part of the task to be completed by another thread, possibly chosen from a pool of slave threads that are waiting around to finish tasks that have been started by master threads. NOTE: I recently posted this same question (sort of) here http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2754884/unlocking-a-mutex-from-a-different-thread-c but I confused mutexes with semaphores, and so the question about using boost locks didn't really get addressed.

    Read the article

  • Modelling boost::Lockable with semaphore rather than mutex (previously titled: Unlocking a mutex fr

    - by dan
    I'm using the C++ boost::thread library, which in my case means I'm using pthreads. Officially, a mutex must be unlocked from the same thread which locks it, and I want the effect of being able to lock in one thread and then unlock in another. There are many ways to accomplish this. One possibility would be to write a new mutex class which allows this behavior. For example: class inter_thread_mutex{ bool locked; boost::mutex mx; boost::condition_variable cv; public: void lock(){ boost::unique_lock<boost::mutex> lck(mx); while(locked) cv.wait(lck); locked=true; } void unlock(){ { boost::lock_guard<boost::mutex> lck(mx); if(!locked) error(); locked=false; } cv.notify_one(); } // bool try_lock(); void error(); etc. } I should point out that the above code doesn't guarantee FIFO access, since if one thread calls lock() while another calls unlock(), this first thread may acquire the lock ahead of other threads which are waiting. (Come to think of it, the boost::thread documentation doesn't appear to make any explicit scheduling guarantees for either mutexes or condition variables). But let's just ignore that (and any other bugs) for now. My question is, if I decide to go this route, would I be able to use such a mutex as a model for the boost Lockable concept. For example, would anything go wrong if I use a boost::unique_lock< inter_thread_mutex for RAII-style access, and then pass this lock to boost::condition_variable_any.wait(), etc. On one hand I don't see why not. On the other hand, "I don't see why not" is usually a very bad way of determining whether something will work. The reason I ask is that if it turns out that I have to write wrapper classes for RAII locks and condition variables and whatever else, then I'd rather just find some other way to achieve the same effect. EDIT: The kind of behavior I want is basically as follows. I have an object, and it needs to be locked whenever it is modified. I want to lock the object from one thread, and do some work on it. Then I want to keep the object locked while I tell another worker thread to complete the work. So the first thread can go on and do something else while the worker thread finishes up. When the worker thread gets done, it unlocks the mutex. And I want the transition to be seemless so nobody else can get the mutex lock in between when thread 1 starts the work and thread 2 completes it. Something like inter_thread_mutex seems like it would work, and it would also allow the program to interact with it as if it were an ordinary mutex. So it seems like a clean solution. If there's a better solution, I'd be happy to hear that also. EDIT AGAIN: The reason I need locks to begin with is that there are multiple master threads, and the locks are there to prevent them from accessing shared objects concurrently in invalid ways. So the code already uses loop-level lock-free sequencing of operations at the master thread level. Also, in the original implementation, there were no worker threads, and the mutexes were ordinary kosher mutexes. The inter_thread_thingy came up as an optimization, primarily to improve response time. In many cases, it was sufficient to guarantee that the "first part" of operation A, occurs before the "first part" of operation B. As a dumb example, say I punch object 1 and give it a black eye. Then I tell object 1 to change it's internal structure to reflect all the tissue damage. I don't want to wait around for the tissue damage before I move on to punch object 2. However, I do want the tissue damage to occur as part of the same operation; for example, in the interim, I don't want any other thread to reconfigure the object in such a way that would make tissue damage an invalid operation. (yes, this example is imperfect in many ways, and no I'm not working on a game) So we made the change to a model where ownership of an object can be passed to a worker thread to complete an operation, and it actually works quite nicely; each master thread is able to get a lot more operations done because it doesn't need to wait for them all to complete. And, since the event sequencing at the master thread level is still loop-based, it is easy to write high-level master-thread operations, as they can be based on the assumption that an operation is complete when the corresponding function call returns. Finally, I thought it would be nice to use inter_thread mutex/semaphore thingies using RAII with boost locks to encapsulate the necessary synchronization that is required to make the whole thing work.

    Read the article

  • ARM cortex: mutex using bit banding

    - by Jeff V
    Given that, on the ARM Cortex M3, I can: atomically read a single bit atomically set a single bit atomically clear a single bit How can I combine these for a mutex style set of operations: try lock take lock release lock It seems that try_lock or take_lock would require two operations that would not be atomic. Do I need more control to accomplish this? Disable global interrupts would do it but it seems there should be a more surgical approach.

    Read the article

  • Shrew VPN Client gives default route- changing the policy stops me from accessing VPN network

    - by Lock
    I am using the shrew client to connect to what I believe is a Netscreen VPN. Now, when connected, the client adds the VPN as the default route. I do not want this- there is only 1 network behind the VPN that I need to access. I found that with the shrew client, you can change the "Policy" settings on the connection, and can add your own networks in that should tunnel over the VPN. I do this, and add my network in, but when I connect the VPN, I get nothing. Can't access the network. Any idea why this would be? I can see my network in the routing table, and its correctly pointing to the correct gateway. A traceroute shows all time-outs, so I can't be 100% sure that it is trying to tunnel over the VPN. Any idea how I can troubleshoot this?

    Read the article

  • IIS- defining a website as a dev site

    - by Lock
    I am new to IIS. Is there a way during the setup of IIS to have a variable of some sort set that I can use to tell my site that this is the development copy? I am using PHP via IIS 7.5 and would like to have a file with a few lines that define which databases etc is used by my application. Is this the purpose of web.config? I would love there to be a place in the setup of the website where I can set a few variables that are accessibly by my application. That way, when I migrate files to live, I don't need to worry about access details to databases etc.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36  | Next Page >