Search Results

Search found 34595 results on 1384 pages for 'vendor id'.

Page 294/1384 | < Previous Page | 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301  | Next Page >

  • child objects in linq

    - by gangt
    I checked before I posted but couldn't find a solution. I'm new to linq and it is draining my brain to understand it. I have an xml and want to use linq to fill object that has a child object. the xml and my linq is below. My issue is on this line TaskItems = t.Elements("taskdetail").ToList<TaskItem>() //this line doesn't work how do I fill this child object? var task1 = from t in xd.Descendants("taskheader") select new { Id = t.Element("id").Value, Name = t.Element("name").Value, IsActive = Convert.ToBoolean(Convert.ToInt16(t.Element("isactive").Value)) TaskItems = t.Elements("taskdetail").ToList<TaskItem>() }; <tasks> <taskheader> <id>1</id> <name>some task</name> <isactive>1</isactive> <taskdetail> <taskid>1</taskid> <name>action1</name> <value>some action</value> </taskdetail> <taskdetail> <taskid>1</taskid> <name>action2</name> <value>some other action</value> </taskdetail> </taskheader> </tasks> public class Task { public int Id; public string Name; public bool IsActive; public List<TaskItem> TaskItems = new List<TaskItem>(); } public class TaskItem { public int TaskId; public string Name; public string Value; }

    Read the article

  • Does the order of the columns in a SELECT statement make a difference?

    - by Frank Computer
    This question was inspired by a previous question posted on SO, "Does the order of the WHERE clause make a differnece?". Would it improve a SELECT statement's performance if the the columns used in the WHERE section are placed at the begining of the SELECT statement? example: SELECT customer.id, transaction.id, transaction.efective_date, transaction.a, [...] FROM customer, transaction WHERE customer.id = transaction.id; I do know that limiting the list of columns to only the needed ones in a SELECT statement improves performance as opposed to using SELECT * because the current list is smaller.

    Read the article

  • How to fill in form field, and submit, using javascript?

    - by cannyboy
    If I have an html document whose rough structure is <html> <head> </head> <body class="bodyclass" id="bodyid"> <div class="headerstuff">..stuff...</div> <div class = "body"> <form action="http://example.com/login" id="login_form" method="post"> <div class="form_section">You can login here</div> <div class="form_section"> <input xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" class="text" id="username" name="session[username_or_email]" tabindex="1" type="text" value="" /> </div> <div class="form_section">etc</div> <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" class="buttons"> <button type="submit" class="" name="" id="go" tabindex="3">Go</button> <button type="submit" class="" name="cancel" id="cancel" tabindex="4">Cancel</button> </div> </form> </div> </body> </html> You can see that there is a username field and a Go button. How would I, using Javascript, fill in the username and press Go...? I would prefer to use plain JS, rather than a library like jquery.

    Read the article

  • how to list out the submited data in same page where form submitted?

    - by OM The Eternity
    I have a form with 3 text values and one image.. I want to save these values such that i can display these records in the list below.. how can i do that... I am using osCommerce For example: <form method="post" id="fm-form" action ="" enctype="multipart/form-data"> <label>Name:</label> <input type="text" id="fm-name" name="fm-name" value="" /> <label>Email:</label> <input type="text" id="fm-email" name="fm-email" value="" /> <label>Birthdate:</label> <input type="text" id="fm-birthdate" name="fm-birthdate" value="" /> <input type="file" id="fm-image" name="fm-image"/> <input type="submit" id="fm-submit" value="Save it"> </form> <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr > <td align="center" class="productListing-heading">Product(s)</td> <td align="center" class="productListing-heading">Edit</td> <td align="center" class="productListing-heading">Delete</td> </tr> <?php for($i=0;$i<$count_image;$i++){?> <tr> <td align="left" class="productListing-data1"> <?php echo tep_image(DIR_WS_IMAGES . $file_realname, $save_image[$i], '110', '110');?> </td> <td align="center" class="productListing-data1">Edit</td> <td align="center" class="productListing-data1">Delete</td> </tr> <tr><td>&nbsp;</td></tr> <?php }?> </table> In the above format as the form is submitted the image has to be stored in a count_image array variable... and the on its count, the list below the form is displayed.. but i cannot get it worked.. could u pls help in doing this...

    Read the article

  • Mysql select most frequent and sort alphabetically

    - by user2605793
    I am trying to select the most common 100 names from a table then display the list showing the names and count. I want the user to be able to re-sort the list alphabetically rather than based on count. I thought the following code would do it. It works for the default sort by count but fails on the sort alphabetically. The line "$count = mysql_num_rows($table);" gives an error: mysql_num_rows() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given. Any help would be greatly appreciated. // Get most popular surnames echo '<h2>Most Common Surnames</h2>'; if ($sort == "") { // default sort by count echo '<a href="http://mysite/names.php?id='.$id.'&sort=name">Sort by name</a><br>'; $query = "SELECT family_name, COUNT(*) as count FROM namefile WHERE record_key = $id GROUP BY family_name ORDER BY count DESC LIMIT 100"; } else { // sort alphabetically echo '<a href="http://mysite/names.php?id='.$id.'">Sort by count</a><br>'; $query = "SELECT * FROM ( SELECT family_name, COUNT(*) as count FROM namefile WHERE record_key = $id GROUP BY family_name ORDER BY count DESC LIMIT 100) AS alpha ORDER BY family_name"; } $table = mysql_query($query); $count = mysql_num_rows($table); $tot = 0; $i = 0; echo '<table><tr>'; while ($tot < $count2) { $rec2 = mysql_fetch_array($table2); echo '<td>'.$rec2[0].'</td><td>'.$rec2[1].'</td><td width="40">&nbsp;</td><td>'; if ($i++ == 6) { echo '</tr><tr>'; $i = 0; } $tot++; } echo '</tr></table><br>'; UPDATE: I needed to add "AS alpha" to give the outer select a unique name. (alpha is just a random name I made up.) It now works perfectly. Code updated for the benefit of any others who need something similar.

    Read the article

  • Access Array Element with Smarty

    - by streetparade
    How can i acces an Array Element in Smarty with a second variable as index? Imagine i have an array of language [99] = Array ( [language] = English ) I tryed this : $memberLanguage.id is 99 so logicaly you would acces it this way {$language.$memberLanguage.id.language} but this doesnt work. in PHP i would do it this way $language[$memberLanguage['id']]['language'] How can i access the Array Element Dynamicaly?

    Read the article

  • How to get correct children ids using fields_for "parents[]", parent do |f| using f.fields_for :children, child ?

    - by Anatortoise House
    I'm editing multiple instances of a parent model in an index view in one form, as in Railscasts #198. Each parent has_many :children and accepts_nested_attributes_for :children, as in Railscasts #196 and #197 <%= form_tag %> <% for parent in @parents %> <%= fields_for "parents[]", parent do |f| <%= f.text_field :job %> <%= f.fields_for :children do |cf| %> <% cf.text_field :chore %> <% end %> <% end %> <% end %> <% end %> Given parent.id==1 f.text_field :job correctly generates <input id="parents_1_job" type="text" value="coding" size="30" name="parents[1][job]"> But cf.text_field :chore generates ids and names that don't have the parent index. id="parents_children_attributes_0_chore" name="parents[children_attributes][0][chore]" If I try passing the specific child object to f.fields_for like this: <% for child in parent.children %> <%= f.fields_for :children, child do |cf| %> <%= cf.text_field :chore %> <% end %> <% end %> I get the same. If I change the method from :children to "[]children" I get id="parents_1___children_chore" which gets the right parent_index but doesn't provide an array slot for the child index. "[]children[]" isn't right either: id="parents_1__children_3_chore" as I was expecting attributes_0_chore instead of 3_chore. Do I need to directly modify an attribute of the FormBuilder object, or subclass FormBuilder to make this work, or is there a syntax that fits this situation? Thanks for any thoughts.

    Read the article

  • MySQL comparisons between multiple rows

    - by Hurpe
    I have a MySQL table with the following columns: id(int), date (timestamp), starttime(varchar), endtime(varchar), ... I need to find time slots that are occupied by two or more rows. Here is an example table id| date |starttime|endtime | __|_____________________|_________|________| 1 | 2010-02-16 17:37:36 |14:35:00 |17:37:00| 2 | 2010-02-17 12:24:22 |12:13:00 |14:32:00| 3 | 2010-02-16 12:24:22 |15:00:00 |18:00:00| Rows 1 and 3 collide, and need to be corrected by the user. I need a query to identify such colliding rows - something that would give me the ID of all rows in the collision. When inserting data in the database I find collisions with this query: SELECT ID FROM LEDGER WHERE DATE(DATE) = DATE('$timestamp') AND ( STR_TO_DATE('$starttime','%H:%i:%s') BETWEEN STR_TO_DATE(STARTTIME,'%H:%i:%s') AND STR_TO_DATE(ENDTIME,'%H:%i:%s') OR STR_TO_DATE('$endtime','%H:%i:%s') BETWEEN STR_TO_DATE(STARTTIME,'%H:%i:%s') AND STR_TO_DATE(ENDTIME,'%H:%i:%s') ) AND FNAME = '$fname'"; Is there any way to accomplish this strictly using MySQL or do I have to use PHP to find the collisions?

    Read the article

  • Converting button events etc to ASP.NET MVC

    - by Sophie88
    Given an asp.net webform page which does something like asp.net <asp:textbox id="txtA" runat="server" /> <asp:textbox id="txtB" runat="server" /> <asp:button id="btnAddTogether" runat="server" text="Go" onclick="btn_Click"/> <asp:textbox id="txtResult" runat="server" /> code behind protected void btn_Click(...) { txtResult.Text = txtA.Text + txtB.Text; } How would I convert this to ASP.NET MVC. It's a pretty trivial example, but I'm not sure about how to change my way of thinking.

    Read the article

  • Unnecessary Redundancy with Tables.

    - by Stacey
    My items are listed as follows; This is just a summary of course. But I'm using a method shown for the "Detail" table to represent a type of 'inheritence', so to speak - since "Item" and "Downloadable" are going to be identical except that each will have a few additional fields relevant only to them. My question is in this design pattern. This sort of thing appears many, many times in our projects - is there a more intelligent way to handle it? I basically need to normalize the tables as much as possible. I'm extremely new to databases and so this is all very confusing to me. There are 5 items. Awards, Items, Purchases, Tokens, and Downloads. They are all very, very similar, except each has a few pieces of data relevant only to itself. I've tried to use a declaration field (like an enumerator 'Type' field) in conjunction with nullable columns, but I was told that is a bad approach. What I have done is take everything similar and place it in a single table, and then each type has its own table that references a column in the 'base' table. The problem occurs with relationships, or junctions. Linking all of these back to a customer. Each type takes around 2 additional tables to properly junction all of the data together- and as such, my database is growing very, very large. Is there a smarter practice for this kind of behavior? Item ID | GUID Name | varchar(64) Product ID | GUID Name | varchar(64) Store | GUID [ FK ] Details | GUID [FK] Downloadable ID | GUID Name | varchar(64) Url | nvarchar(2048) Details | GUID [FK] Details ID | GUID Price | decimal Description | text Peripherals [ JUNCTION ] ID | GUID Detail | GUID [FK] Store ID | GUID Addresses | GUID Addresses ID | GUID Name | nvarchar(64) State | int [FK] ZipCode | int Address | nvarchar(64) State ID | int Name | varchar(32)

    Read the article

  • Cakephp 2.2 Blog Tutorial undefined constant errors

    - by user1741925
    Have copy pasted the code from Blog tutorial in cakephp 2.2 but its not working. Getting the following errors. Notice (8): Use of undefined constant Html Notice (8): Use of undefined constant Form Notice (8): Use of undefined constant posts Notice (8): Use of undefined constant all Notice (8): Undefined index: all Below is the code for PostsController and index.ctp. <?php class PostsController extends AppController { public $helpers = array(’Html’, ’Form’); public function index() { $this->set(’posts’, $this->Post->find(’all’)); } public function view($id = null) { $this->Post->id = $id; $this->set(’post’, $this->Post->read()); } } ?> index.ctp <h1>Blog posts</h1> <table> <tr> <th>Id</th> <th>Title</th> <th>Created</th> </tr> <?php foreach ($posts as $post): ?> <tr> <td><?php echo $post[’Post’][’id’]; ?></td> <td> <?php echo $post[’Post’][’title’]; ?> </td> <td><?php echo $post[’Post’][’created’]; ?></td> </tr> <?php endforeach; ?> <?php unset($post); ?> </table>

    Read the article

  • objective-c - calling one constructor from another

    - by synic
    Say you had the following two constructors: - (id)initWithTitle:(NSString *)title; - (id)initWithTitle:(NSString *)title page:(NSString *)page; The second constructor is no different from the first, except that it sets up the member variable "page". Since it basically has to do the same thing, is there a way to call the first one from the second one to reduce code duplication, or do you have to set up a third method to do the common tasks? I'm talking about something similar to this, though I doubt this will work: - (id)initWithTitle:(NSString *)_title { if(self = [super init]) { self.title = _title; } return self; } - (id)initWithTitle:(NSString *)_title page:(NSString *)_page { if(self = [self initWithTitle:_title]) { self.page = _page; } return self; }

    Read the article

  • MySQL Query : Advise Needed.

    - by Rachel
    "SELECT id as Id from dbTable WHERE code = ? AND CURDATE() BETWEEN start_date AND end_date AND offerId IN ('12321', '12124')"; //Passing arguments for the query $args = array_merge(array(51342),$offerid); //Execute the prepared query $statement->execute($args); Now array(51342) represents combination of code+value, aside my database has value, code columns and so I want a query which would look logically like "SELECT id as Id from dbTable WHERE code and value (Note here I do not know the syntax, what am looking at is (code+value = ?), please advise on query) = ? AND CURDATE() BETWEEN start_date AND end_date AND offerId IN ('12321', '12124')";

    Read the article

  • How to get java singleton object manager to return any type of object?

    - by Robert
    I'm writing an interactive fiction game in java from scratch. I'm currently storing all of my game object references in a hashmap in a singleton called ObjectManager. ObjectManager has a function called get which takes an integer ID and returns the appropriate reference. The problem is that it returns a BaseObject when I need to return subclasses of BaseObject with more functionality. So, what I've done so far is I've added a getEntity function which returns BaseEntity (which is a subclass of BaseObject). However, when I need the function to return to an object that is a subclass of BaseEntity that has added, required functionality, I will need to make another function. I know there is a better way, but I don't know what it is. I know very little of design patterns, and I'm not sure which one to use here. I tried passing 'class' as a parameter, but that didn't get me anywhere. public BaseObject get(int ID){ return (BaseObject)refMap.get(ID); } public BaseEntity getEntity(int ID){ return (BaseEntity)refMap.get(ID); } Thanks, java ninjas!

    Read the article

  • Is this the best way to query an element and its children?

    - by Soviut
    I'm trying to query an element and its children to find ID's that begin with a particular string. var foundIDs = containerElement.find('[id^=something]').andSelf().filter('id^=something'); The find() method only searches descendants so I thought I'd try andSelf(). However, andSelf() does not take a selector. This means that the container element is included regardless of whether it matches the find query or not and I then have to perform a secondary filter() on it to remove the container element if it didn't match after all. I attempted to put andSelf() before the find() but it didn't seem to pick up the container element into the stack. containerElement.andSelf().find('[id^=something]'); Is there any better way to achieve what I'm doing?

    Read the article

  • Use SQL to clone data in two tables that have a 1-1 relationship in each table

    - by AmoebaMan17
    Using MS SQL 2005, Table 1 ID | T1Value | T2ID | GroupID ---------------------------------- 1 | a | 10 | 1 2 | b | 11 | 1 3 | c | 12 | 1 4 | a | 22 | 2 Table 2 ID | T2Value ---------------- 10 | H 11 | J 12 | K 22 | H I want to clone the data for GroupID == 1 into a new GroupID so that I result with the following: Table 1 ID | T1Value | T2ID | GroupID ---------------------------------- 1 | a | 10 | 1 2 | b | 11 | 1 3 | c | 12 | 1 4 | a | 22 | 2 5 | a | 23 | 3 6 | b | 24 | 3 7 | c | 25 | 3 Table 2 ID | T2Value ---------------- 10 | H 11 | J 12 | K 22 | H 23 | H 24 | J 25 | K I've found some SQL clone patterns that allow me to clone data in the same table well... but as I start to deal with cloning data in two tables at the same time and then linking up the new rows correctly... that's just not something I feel like I have a good grasp of. I thought I could do some self-joins to deal with this, but I am worried in the cases where the non-key fields have the same data in multiple rows.

    Read the article

  • How could I compare these database values in PHP?

    - by Dan
    So a user selects from a drop down list a value. I take this value, put it into a variable, then select from the database the ID value of that table A holding the selected value also. So now I'm trying to use that ID value to get to a many-to-many relationship table that has the selected value from table A to a different table B. The many-to-many relationship table has both IDs. How can I compare this using PHP? So it would be like: $A = $_POST['a']; $sql = "SELECT a, aID from TABLEA WHERE a = $A"; What do I do then to compare the aID with the many-to-many relationships table, then get the other ID in that table and then take that ID to get values from table B?

    Read the article

  • Method to sort MYSQL results by an arbitriary letter (ie, show all rows starting with F first)

    - by Buzz
    I have a column of states, and, depending on the query, I want to order by results by a particular state, then by id (Asc or Desc, depending). For instance, I might want to show all rows with state "HI", sorted by ID desc, and then all the other rows, sorted by id desc. I was hoping I could do this in one query, rather than getting all my favored state results, and then getting the rest. Can I?

    Read the article

  • how to arrange the checkboxes in 3/3 format on a layout of a form

    - by anwaar
    hi there can anyone plz tell me how to arrange the list of checkboxes of cuisines label which is retrived from the data base and when it is displaying it is not in the order coming side by side all together i want it to be displayed in a 3 by 3 format.here is the code for that: <div id="frmform"> <form name="frmrestaurant" id="frmrestaurant" method="post" onsubmit="" enctype="multipart/form-data"> <p class="msgsignup">Add Restaurant</p> <div id="iderror"></div> <div class="topinputs"> <div> <label for="restaurant_name" class="name">Restaurant Name :</label><input type="text" name="restaurant_name" size="32" id="restaurant_name" value="<?php echo $row->restaurant_name; ?>" class="validate[required,custom[onlyLetter],length[0,100]] text-input" /> </div> </div> <div> <label for="website" class="name">Website :</label><input size="32" type="text" name="website" id="website" value="<?php echo $row->website; ?>" class="validate[required,length[0,100]] text-input" /> </div> <div> <label for="budget" class="name">Budget :</label> <?php echo $this->lists['budget'];?> </div> <div> <label for="idcuisine" class="cuisine" >Cuisine:</label> <?php echo $this->lists['cuisine'] ;?> <div> <label for="idcategory" class="category">Category:</label> <?php echo $this->lists['category'];?> </div> the lists of cuisine and category is not displaying properly. thanks.

    Read the article

  • Facebook FB.Event.subscribe does not work

    - by DNReNTi
    I'd like to follow how many likes I get on my page, but something is wrong. I am using the Facebook javascript event handler but it doesnt work. It should alerts me when I click on the like or on the dislike button but it does not do anything. Any idea where I am wrong? Thanks! And sorry for my english. Here is my UPDATED code: <!DOCTYPE html> <html xmlns:fb="http://ogp.me/ns/fb#"> <head> <title>FBlike check</title> </head> <body> <div id="fb-root"></div> <script> (function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1&appId=00000000000000000"; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk')); FB.Event.subscribe('edge.create', function(response) { alert('You liked the URL: ' + response); } ); </script> <fb:like href="https://www.facebook.com/XYZ" send="false" layout="button_count" width="200" show_faces="false"></fb:like> </body> </html>

    Read the article

  • Facebook API - Detect if session is active OR NOT active

    - by Tom Doe
    I'm sure I'm simply overlooking something in the Facebook API docs. Basically, after I've loaded the FB Graph, I need to know if the session is active... I cannot simply assume they're logged out and simply re-render if they're logged in once the 'auth.statusChange' event is triggered. I need to know right off the bat. Below is the code that I've used. Most importantly the FB.getLoginStatus/getAuthResponse/getAccessToken don't work like I'd expect; essentially where it indicates, when invoked, whether they're logged in or out. (function(d) { // Create fb-root var fb_root = document.createElement('div'); fb_root.id = "fb-root"; document.getElementsByTagName('body')[0].appendChild( fb_root ); // Load FB Async var js, id = 'facebook-jssdk', ref = d.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) {return;} js = d.createElement('script'); js.id = id; js.async = true; js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js"; ref.parentNode.insertBefore(js, ref); // App config-data var config = { appId : XXXX, cookie: true, status: true, frictionlessRequests: true }; window.fbAsyncInit = function() { // This won't work. // I can't assume they're logged out and rely on this to tell me they're logged in. FB.Event.subscribe('auth.statusChange', function(response) {}); // Init FB.init(config); // These do not inidicate if the user is logged out :( FB.getLoginStatus(function(response) { }); FB.getAuthResponse(function(response) { }); FB.getAccessToken(function(response) { }); }; }(document)); Any help is much appreciated. :)

    Read the article

  • Duplicate / Copy records in the same MySQL table

    - by Digits
    I have been looking for a while now but I can not find an easy solution for my problem. I would like to duplicate a record in a table, but of course, the unique primary key needs to be updated. I have this query: INSERT INTO invoices SELECT * FROM invoices AS iv WHERE iv.ID=XXXXX ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE ID = (SELECT MAX(ID)+1 FROM invoices) the problem is that this just changes the ID of the row instead of copying the row. Does anybody know how to fix this ? Thank you verrry much, Digits //edit: I would like to do this without typing all the field names because the field names can change over time.

    Read the article

  • PHP arrays & keys - fetching particular ones

    - by Rohan
    Hi Lets say I have an array with a structure like this: $arr= Array( array( "id"=>"a" "type">"apple"), array( "id"=>"b"), array( "id"=>"c"), array( "id"=>"c" "type"=>"banana") ); now I want to have a foreach loop which fetches all the array elements which have a key in them named "type". Something like foreach(all arrays which have type in them as $item) How would I do that? many thanks.

    Read the article

  • Incrementing through mysql PHP

    - by Rawdon
    I am looking at try to increment and decrement by three records through a table and present those records. Say if the id '4' is currently active. I want the to be display the ID's and category of 3.2.1 and 5.6.7 from an increment and decrement So far I have: $stmt = $db->query("SELECT id, category FROM test"); $stmt->execute(); while ($results = $stmt->fetch(PDO::FETCH_ASSOC)) { $current = $results['id']; $category = $results['category']; $next = array(array('slide_no' => $current, 'category' => $category)); } print_r($next); Now with this, I am getting back every row in the table. I'm now getting confused on how I could increment and decrement the records by 3 and make sure that the category will also increment correctly. Thank you very much.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301  | Next Page >