Search Results

Search found 30884 results on 1236 pages for 'javascript module'.

Page 3/1236 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

  • Javascript Implementation Patterns for Server-side MVC Websites

    - by tmo256
    I'm looking for information on common patterns for initializing and executing Javascript page by page in a "traditional" server-side MVC website architecture. A few months ago, my development team began, but abandoned, a major re-architecture of our company's primary web app, including a full front-end redesign. In the process, there was some debate about the architecture of the Javascript in the current version of the site, and whether it fit into a clear, modern design pattern. Now I've returned to the process of overhauling the front end of this and several other MVC websites (Ruby on Rails and MVC.net) to implement a responsive framework (Bootstrap), and in the process will again need to review then revamp and update a lot of Javascript. These web applications are NOT single-page Javascript applications (in fact, we are ripping out a lot of Ajax) or designed to require a Javascript MVC pattern; these apps are basically brochure, catalog and administrative sites that follow a server-side MVC pattern. The vast majority of the Javascript required is behavioral, pre-built plugins (JQuery and Bootstrap, et al) that execute on specific DOM nodes. I'm going to give a very brief (as brief as I can be) run-down of the current architecture only in order to illustrate the scope and type of paradigm I'm talking about. Hopefully, it will help you understand the nature of the patterns I'm looking for, but I'm not looking for commentary on the specifics of this code. What I've done in the past is relatively straight-forward and easy to maintain, but, as mentioned above, some of the other developers don't like the current architecture. Currently, on document ready, I execute whatever global Javascript needs to occur on every page, and then call a page-specific init function to initialize node-specific functionality, retrieving the init method from a JS object. On each page load, something like this will happen: $(document).ready(function(){ $('header').menuAction(); App.pages.executePage('home','show'); //dynamic from framework request object }); And the main App javascript is like App = { usefulGlobalVar: 0, pages: { executePage: function(action, controller) { // if exists, App.pages[action][controller].init() }, home: { show: { init: function() { $('#tabs').tabs(); //et. al }, normalizeName: function() { // dom-specific utility function that // doesn't require a full-blown component/class/module } }, edit: ... }, user_profile: ... } } Any common features and functionality requiring modularization or compotentizing is done as needed with prototyping. For common implementation of plugins, I often extend JQuery, so I can easily initialize a plugin with the same options throughout the site. For example, $('[data-tabs]').myTabs() with this code in a utility javascript file: (function($) { $.fn.myTabs = function() { this.tabs( { //...common options }); }; }) Pointers to articles, books or other discussions would be most welcome. Again, I am looking for a site-wide implementation pattern, NOT a JS MVC framework or general how-tos on creating JS classes or components. Thanks for your help!

    Read the article

  • Accessing jQuery objects in the module pattern

    - by Stewart
    Hello, Really getting in to javascript and looking around at some patterns. One I have come accross is the module pattern. Its seems like a nice way to think of chucks of functionality so I went ahead and tried to implement it with jQuery. I ran in to a snag though. Consider the following code <!DOCTYPE html> <html> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"> <title>index</title> <script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8" src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.4.4/jquery.min.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"> $(document).ready(function(){ var TestClass2 = (function(){ var someDiv; return { thisTest: function () { someDiv = document.createElement("div"); $(someDiv).append("#index"); $(someDiv).html("hello"); $(someDiv).addClass("test_class"); } } })(); TestClass2.thisTest(); }); </script> </head> <body id="index" onload=""> <div id="name"> this is content </div> </body> </html> The above code alerts the html content of the div and then adds a class. These both use jQuery methods. The problem is that the .html() method works fine however i can not add the class. No errors result and the class does not get added. What is happening here? Why is the class not getting added to the div?

    Read the article

  • Python Importing object that originates in one module from a different module into a third module

    - by adewinter
    I was reading the sourcode for a python project and came across the following line: from couchexport.export import Format (source: https://github.com/wbnigeria/couchexport/blob/master/couchexport/views.py#L1 ) I went over to couchexport/export.py to see what Format was (Class? Dict? something else?). Unfortunately Format isn't in that file. export.py does however import a Format from couchexport.models where there is a Format class (source: https://github.com/wbnigeria/couchexport/blob/master/couchexport/models.py#L11). When I open up the original file in my IDE and have it look up the declaration, in line I mentioned at the start of this question, it leads directly to models.py. What's going on? How can an import from one file (export.py) actually be an import from another file (models.py) without being explicitly stated?

    Read the article

  • Instantiate a javascript module only one time.

    - by Cedric Dugas
    Hey guys, I follow a module pattern where I instantiate components, however, a lot of time a component will only be instantiate one time (example: a comment system for an article). For now I instantiate in the same JS file. but I was wondering if it is the wrong approach? It kind of make no sense to instantiate in the same file and always only once. But at the same time, if this file is in the page I want to have access to my module without instantiate from elsewhere, and IF I need another instance, I just create another from elsewhere... Here is the pattern I follow: ApplicationNamespace.Classname = function() { // constructor function privateFunctionInit() { // private } this.privilegedFunction = function() { // privileged privateFunction(); }; privateFunctionInit() }; ApplicationNamespace.Classname.prototype = { Method: function(){} } var class = new ApplicationNamespace.Classname(); What do you think, wrong approach, or is this good?

    Read the article

  • Advantages of using pure JavaScript over JQuery

    - by Shivan Dragon
    What are the advantages of using Javascript-only versus using JQuery-only? I have limited experience with JavaScript and JQuery coding. I've added bits and snippets of each to HTML pages but I've mostly coded server-side stuff in other languages. I've noticed that while you can theoretically do the same things using either of the two approaches (and of course you can even mix 'em up in the same project) there seems to be a tendency to always start using JQuery from the very beginning no-matter what the project demands are. So I'm simply wondering, are there any punctual benefits to not use JQuery-only but instead to just use plain old JavaScript? I know this looks like a non-question because it can be said about it that "there's no definite answer" or "it can be debated for ever", but I'm actually hoping for punctual answers such as "You can do this in one approach and you cannot do it with the other". ==EDIT== As per scrwtp's comment, I'm not referring just to the DOM Handling part. My question is rather: JQuery is a library. For Javascript. What I find strange about this library as opposed to other libraries for other languages is that in JQyery's case it seems to be designed to be able to use it exclusively and not need to touch Javascript directly. This is as opposed to let's say Hibernate and SQL, where even though the library (or rather framework in this case, but I think the analogy still applies) takes the handle on A LOT of aspects, you still get to use SQL when using it, at least for some fringe cases. However in JQuery & Javascript case, you could do anything you do with Javascript using only JQuery (or at least that's how it seems to me).

    Read the article

  • With AMD style modules in JavaScript is there any benefit to namespaces?

    - by gman
    Coming from C++ originally and seeing lots of Java programmers doing the same we brought namespaces to JavaScript. See Google's closure library as an example where they have a main namespace, goog and under that many more namespaces like goog.async, goog.graphics But now, having learned the AMD style of requiring modules it seems like namespaces are kind of pointless in JavaScript. Not only pointless but even arguably an anti-pattern. What is AMD? It's a way of defining and including modules that removes all direct dependencies. Effectively you do this // some/module.js define([ 'name/of/needed/module', 'name/of/someother/needed/module', ], function( RefToNeededModule, RefToSomeOtherNeededModule) { ...code... return object or function }); This format lets the AMD support code know that this module needs name/of/needed/module.js and name/of/someother/needed/module.js loaded. The AMD code can load all the modules and then, assuming no circular dependencies, call the define function on each module in the correct order, record the object/function returned by the module as it calls them, and then call any other modules' define function with references to those modules. This seems to remove any need for namespaces. In your own code you can call the reference to any other module anything you want. For example if you had 2 string libraries, even if they define similar functions, as long as they follow the AMD pattern you can easily use both in the same module. No need for namespaces to solve that. It also means there's no hard coded dependencies. For example in Google's closure any module could directly reference another module with something like var value = goog.math.someMathFunc(otherValue) and if you're unlucky it will magically work where as with AMD style you'd have to explicitly include the math library otherwise the module wouldn't have a reference to it since there are no globals with AMD. On top of that dependency injection for testing becomes easy. None of the code in the AMD module references things by namespace so there is no hardcoded namespace paths, you can easily mock classes at testing time. Is there any other point to namespaces or is that something that C++ / Java programmers are bringing to JavaScript that arguably doesn't really belong?

    Read the article

  • JavaScript Module Pattern - What about using "return this"?

    - by Rob
    After doing some reading about the Module Pattern, I've seen a few ways of returning the properties which you want to be public. One of the most common ways is to declare your public properties and methods right inside of the "return" statement, apart from your private properties and methods. A similar way (the "Revealing" pattern) is to provide simply references to the properties and methods which you want to be public. Lastly, a third technique I saw was to create a new object inside your module function, to which you assign your new properties before returning said object. This was an interesting idea, but requires the creation of a new object. So I was thinking, why not just use "this.propertyName" to assign your public properties and methods, and finally use "return this" at the end? This way seems much simpler to me, as you can create private properties and methods with the usual "var" or "function" syntax, or use the "this.propertyName" syntax to declare your public methods. Here's the method I'm suggesting: (function() { var privateMethod = function () { alert('This is a private method.'); } this.publicMethod = function () { alert('This is a public method.'); } return this; })(); Are there any pros/cons to using the method above? What about the others?

    Read the article

  • The importance of Design Patterns with Javascript, NodeJs et al

    - by Lewis
    With Javascript appearing to be the ubiquitous programming language of the web over the next few years, new frameworks popping up every five minutes and event driven programming taking a lead both server and client side: Do you as a Javascript developer consider the traditional Design Patterns as important or less important than they have been with other languages / environments?. Please name the top three design patterns you, as a Javascript developer use regularly and give an example of how they have helped in your Javascript development.

    Read the article

  • How to use javascript functions, defined in some external *.js file in browser's javascript console?

    - by Dmytro Tsiniavsky
    I would like to know is it possible to save some, for example,simplemath.js file with function ADD(a, b) { return a + b; } simple function, run opera's or some other browser's javascript console, include somehow this (simplemath.js) file, call ADD(2, 5), and get a result in console or execute javascript code on current web page and manipulate with it's content. How can I do that? How can I use javascript functions from external files in web-browser's javascript console?

    Read the article

  • Javascript click function not working

    - by Nabe
    I need to null the value in text box on click, currently I have written a code as such <div class="keyword_non"> <h1>Keywords : <a class="someClass question_off" title="Keywords "></a></h1> <h2><input type="text" name="kw1" value="one" /></h2> <h2><input type="text" name="kw2" value="two" /></h2> <h2><input type="text" name="kw3" value="three" /></h2> <h2><input type="text" name="kw4" value="four" /></h2> </div> <script type="text/javascript" src="/functions/javascript/custom/non_profit_edit.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="/functions/javascript/jquery-1.7.1.min.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="/functions/javascript/custom/jquery-ui-1.8.7.custom.min.js"></script> Inside non_profit_edit.js i have written as such $(document).ready(function(){ $(".kw1").click(function() { $(".kw1").val(" "); }); $(".kw2").click(function() { $(".kw2").val(" "); }); $(".kw3").click(function() { $(".kw3").val(" "); }); $(".kw4").click(function() { $(".kw4").val(" "); }); }); But write now its not working properly... Is this any browser issues or error in code..

    Read the article

  • JavaScript parser in JavaScript

    - by emk
    I need to add some lightweight syntactic sugar to JavaScript source code, and process it using a JavaScript-based build system. Are there any open source JavaScript parsers written in JavaScript? And are they reasonably fast when run on top of V8 or a similar high-performance JavaScript implementation? Thank you for any pointers you can provide!

    Read the article

  • Can google “see” this custom javascript code which displays links from an external site to mine

    - by webmasters
    I have a javascript code on my site who displays links from another site. This is what I have on my source before: <script language="JavaScript" type="text/javascript">showLink(1);</script> This is what I have copied from my source after the page has loaded: <script language="JavaScript" type="text/javascript">showLink(1);</script><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" class="anc" href="http://x5.external_site.net/sc/out.php?s=5483&amp;o=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bluetooth.com">Bluetooth Devices</a> Can google see this link?

    Read the article

  • extjs - 'Store is undefined'

    - by Jamie
    Hi all, I'm pretty sure this a trivial problem and i'm just being a bit stupid. Your help would be hugely appreciated. In controls/dashboard.js I have: Ext.ill.WCSS.controls.dashboard = { xtype:'portal', region:'center', margins:'35 5 5 0', items:[{ columnWidth: 1, style:'padding:10px', items:[{ title: 'My Cluster Jobs', layout:'fit', html: "test" }] },{ columnWidth: 1, style:'padding:10px', items:[{ title: 'All Cluster Jobs', iconCls: 'icon-queue', html: "test", items: new Ext.grid.GridPanel({ title: 'Cluster Job Queue', store: Ext.ill.WCSS.stores.dashboardClusterJobs, width: 791, height: 333, frame: true, loadMask: true, stateful: false, autoHeight: true, stripeRows: true, floating: false, footer: false, collapsible: false, animCollapse: false, titleCollapse: false, columns:[ { xtype: 'gridcolumn', header: 'Job ID', sortable: true, resizable: true, width: 100, dataIndex: 'JB_job_number', fixed: false }, { xtype: 'gridcolumn', header: 'Priority', sortable: true, resizable: true, width: 100, dataIndex: 'JAT_prio', fixed: false }, { xtype: 'gridcolumn', header: 'User', sortable: true, resizable: true, width: 100, dataIndex: 'JB_owner' }, { xtype: 'gridcolumn', header: 'State', sortable: true, resizable: true, width: 100, dataIndex: 'state' }, { xtype: 'gridcolumn', header: 'Date Submitted', sortable: true, resizable: true, width: 100, dataIndex: 'JAT_start_time' }, { xtype: 'gridcolumn', header: 'Queue', sortable: true, resizable: true, width: 100, dataIndex: 'queue_name' }, { xtype: 'gridcolumn', header: 'CPUs', sortable: true, resizable: true, width: 100, dataIndex: 'slots' } ], bbar: { xtype: 'paging', store: 'storeClusterQueue', displayInfo: true, refreshText: 'Retrieving queue status...', emptyMsg: 'No jobs to retrieve', id: 'clusterQueuePaging' } }) }] }] }; Simple enough, note the reference to 'Ext.ill.WCSS.stores.dashboardClusterJobs' So in stores/dashboard.js I just have this: Ext.ill.WCSS.stores.dashboardClusterJobs = new Ext.data.XmlStore({ storeId: 'storeClusterJobs', record: 'job_list', autoLoad: true, url: 'joblist.xml', idPath: 'job_info', remoteSort: false, fields: [ { name: 'JB_job_number' }, { name: 'JAT_prio' }, { name: 'JB_name' }, { name: 'JB_owner' }, { name: 'state' }, { name: 'JAT_start_time' }, { name: 'slots' }, { name: 'queue_name' } ] }); I run the code and I get 'store is undefined' :S It's confusing me a lot. All of the javascripts have been included in the correct order. i.e. <script type="text/javascript" src="/js/portal.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="/js/stores/dashboard.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="/js/controls/dashboard.js"></script> Thanks guys!

    Read the article

  • Focus on Javascript or Jquery?

    - by daxflame
    Hello, I am a student in college, and I notice that a lot of companies look for people who have experience with Javascript. Does this include Javascript's libraries, like JQuery? Or, are they looking for Javascript people only? It probably depends on the company, but what is the general advice for a student wanting to do some front end work? Is Javascript more powerful than JQuery? I know Jquery is a library and simplifies many tasks, but is there some reason why you would use Javascript over Jquery?

    Read the article

  • Blank Screen at boot Ubuntu 12.04 - nvidia-current - Macbook Air 3,2

    - by soulnafein
    I've installed nvidia-current using the Additional Drivers application in Ubuntu 12.04. I need those drivers so I can use accelerated WebGL. After installing the drivers, and rebooting X fails to start and I have a frozen system/dark screen. Below is the content of Xorg.0.log How can I fix this problem? [ 4.666] X.Org X Server 1.11.3 Release Date: 2011-12-16 [ 4.666] X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0 [ 4.666] Build Operating System: Linux 2.6.42-23-generic x86_64 Ubuntu [ 4.666] Current Operating System: Linux david-macbook-air 3.2.0-34-generic #53-Ubuntu SMP Thu Nov 15 10:48:16 UTC 2012 x86_64 [ 4.666] Kernel command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-34-generic root=UUID=b3d5ae2a-72af-4ef9-b775-0d40b5f80f9b ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 [ 4.666] Build Date: 29 August 2012 12:12:33AM [ 4.666] xorg-server 2:1.11.4-0ubuntu10.8 (For technical support please see http://www.ubuntu.com/support) [ 4.666] Current version of pixman: 0.24.4 [ 4.666] Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org to make sure that you have the latest version. [ 4.666] Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. [ 4.666] (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Thu Dec 13 10:18:02 2012 [ 4.668] (==) Using system config directory "/usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d" [ 4.668] (==) No Layout section. Using the first Screen section. [ 4.668] (==) No screen section available. Using defaults. [ 4.668] (**) |-->Screen "Default Screen Section" (0) [ 4.668] (**) | |-->Monitor "<default monitor>" [ 4.668] (==) No monitor specified for screen "Default Screen Section". Using a default monitor configuration. [ 4.668] (==) Automatically adding devices [ 4.668] (==) Automatically enabling devices [ 4.668] (WW) The directory "/usr/share/fonts/X11/cyrillic" does not exist. [ 4.668] Entry deleted from font path. [ 4.668] (WW) The directory "/usr/share/fonts/X11/100dpi/" does not exist. [ 4.668] Entry deleted from font path. [ 4.669] (WW) The directory "/usr/share/fonts/X11/75dpi/" does not exist. [ 4.669] Entry deleted from font path. [ 4.669] (WW) The directory "/usr/share/fonts/X11/100dpi" does not exist. [ 4.669] Entry deleted from font path. [ 4.669] (WW) The directory "/usr/share/fonts/X11/75dpi" does not exist. [ 4.669] Entry deleted from font path. [ 4.669] (WW) The directory "/var/lib/defoma/x-ttcidfont-conf.d/dirs/TrueType" does not exist. [ 4.669] Entry deleted from font path. [ 4.669] (==) FontPath set to: /usr/share/fonts/X11/misc, /usr/share/fonts/X11/Type1, built-ins [ 4.669] (==) ModulePath set to "/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/xorg/extra-modules,/usr/lib/xorg/extra-modules,/usr/lib/xorg/modules" [ 4.669] (II) The server relies on udev to provide the list of input devices. If no devices become available, reconfigure udev or disable AutoAddDevices. [ 4.669] (II) Loader magic: 0x7f6222467b00 [ 4.669] (II) Module ABI versions: [ 4.669] X.Org ANSI C Emulation: 0.4 [ 4.669] X.Org Video Driver: 11.0 [ 4.669] X.Org XInput driver : 16.0 [ 4.669] X.Org Server Extension : 6.0 [ 4.670] (--) PCI:*(0:2:0:0) 10de:08a3:106b:00d3 rev 162, Mem @ 0x92000000/16777216, 0x80000000/268435456, 0x90000000/33554432, I/O @ 0x00001000/128, BIOS @ 0x????????/131072 [ 4.670] (II) Open ACPI successful (/var/run/acpid.socket) [ 4.670] (II) LoadModule: "extmod" [ 4.671] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libextmod.so [ 4.671] (II) Module extmod: vendor="X.Org Foundation" [ 4.671] compiled for 1.11.3, module version = 1.0.0 [ 4.671] Module class: X.Org Server Extension [ 4.671] ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 6.0 [ 4.671] (II) Loading extension MIT-SCREEN-SAVER [ 4.671] (II) Loading extension XFree86-VidModeExtension [ 4.671] (II) Loading extension XFree86-DGA [ 4.671] (II) Loading extension DPMS [ 4.671] (II) Loading extension XVideo [ 4.671] (II) Loading extension XVideo-MotionCompensation [ 4.671] (II) Loading extension X-Resource [ 4.671] (II) LoadModule: "dbe" [ 4.671] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libdbe.so [ 4.671] (II) Module dbe: vendor="X.Org Foundation" [ 4.671] compiled for 1.11.3, module version = 1.0.0 [ 4.671] Module class: X.Org Server Extension [ 4.671] ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 6.0 [ 4.671] (II) Loading extension DOUBLE-BUFFER [ 4.671] (II) LoadModule: "glx" [ 4.671] (II) Loading /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/xorg/extra-modules/libglx.so [ 4.869] (II) Module glx: vendor="NVIDIA Corporation" [ 4.869] compiled for 4.0.2, module version = 1.0.0 [ 4.869] Module class: X.Org Server Extension [ 4.869] (II) NVIDIA GLX Module 295.40 Thu Apr 5 21:57:38 PDT 2012 [ 4.869] (II) Loading extension GLX [ 4.869] (II) LoadModule: "record" [ 4.870] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/librecord.so [ 4.870] (II) Module record: vendor="X.Org Foundation" [ 4.870] compiled for 1.11.3, module version = 1.13.0 [ 4.870] Module class: X.Org Server Extension [ 4.870] ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 6.0 [ 4.870] (II) Loading extension RECORD [ 4.870] (II) LoadModule: "dri" [ 4.870] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libdri.so [ 4.870] (II) Module dri: vendor="X.Org Foundation" [ 4.870] compiled for 1.11.3, module version = 1.0.0 [ 4.870] ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 6.0 [ 4.870] (II) Loading extension XFree86-DRI [ 4.870] (II) LoadModule: "dri2" [ 4.871] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libdri2.so [ 4.871] (II) Module dri2: vendor="X.Org Foundation" [ 4.871] compiled for 1.11.3, module version = 1.2.0 [ 4.871] ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 6.0 [ 4.871] (II) Loading extension DRI2 [ 4.871] (==) Matched nvidia as autoconfigured driver 0 [ 4.871] (==) Matched nouveau as autoconfigured driver 1 [ 4.871] (==) Matched nv as autoconfigured driver 2 [ 4.871] (==) Matched vesa as autoconfigured driver 3 [ 4.871] (==) Matched fbdev as autoconfigured driver 4 [ 4.871] (==) Assigned the driver to the xf86ConfigLayout [ 4.871] (II) LoadModule: "nvidia" [ 4.871] (II) Loading /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/xorg/extra-modules/nvidia_drv.so [ 4.887] (II) Module nvidia: vendor="NVIDIA Corporation" [ 4.887] compiled for 4.0.2, module version = 1.0.0 [ 4.887] Module class: X.Org Video Driver [ 4.892] (II) LoadModule: "nouveau" [ 4.894] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nouveau_drv.so [ 4.894] (II) Module nouveau: vendor="X.Org Foundation" [ 4.894] compiled for 1.11.3, module version = 1.0.2 [ 4.894] Module class: X.Org Video Driver [ 4.894] ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 11.0 [ 4.894] (II) LoadModule: "nv" [ 4.895] (WW) Warning, couldn't open module nv [ 4.895] (II) UnloadModule: "nv" [ 4.895] (II) Unloading nv [ 4.895] (EE) Failed to load module "nv" (module does not exist, 0) [ 4.895] (II) LoadModule: "vesa" [ 4.895] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/vesa_drv.so [ 4.896] (II) Module vesa: vendor="X.Org Foundation" [ 4.896] compiled for 1.11.3, module version = 2.3.0 [ 4.896] Module class: X.Org Video Driver [ 4.896] ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 11.0 [ 4.896] (II) LoadModule: "fbdev" [ 4.896] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/fbdev_drv.so [ 4.896] (II) Module fbdev: vendor="X.Org Foundation" [ 4.896] compiled for 1.11.3, module version = 0.4.2 [ 4.896] ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 11.0 [ 4.896] (==) Matched nvidia as autoconfigured driver 0 [ 4.896] (==) Matched nouveau as autoconfigured driver 1 [ 4.896] (==) Matched nv as autoconfigured driver 2 [ 4.896] (==) Matched vesa as autoconfigured driver 3 [ 4.896] (==) Matched fbdev as autoconfigured driver 4 [ 4.896] (==) Assigned the driver to the xf86ConfigLayout [ 4.896] (II) LoadModule: "nvidia" [ 4.896] (II) Loading /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/xorg/extra-modules/nvidia_drv.so [ 4.896] (II) Module nvidia: vendor="NVIDIA Corporation" [ 4.896] compiled for 4.0.2, module version = 1.0.0 [ 4.896] Module class: X.Org Video Driver [ 4.896] (II) UnloadModule: "nvidia" [ 4.896] (II) Unloading nvidia [ 4.896] (II) Failed to load module "nvidia" (already loaded, 32610) [ 4.896] (II) LoadModule: "nouveau" [ 4.897] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nouveau_drv.so [ 4.897] (II) Module nouveau: vendor="X.Org Foundation" [ 4.897] compiled for 1.11.3, module version = 1.0.2 [ 4.897] Module class: X.Org Video Driver [ 4.897] ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 11.0 [ 4.897] (II) UnloadModule: "nouveau" [ 4.897] (II) Unloading nouveau [ 4.897] (II) Failed to load module "nouveau" (already loaded, 32610) [ 4.897] (II) LoadModule: "nv" [ 4.897] (WW) Warning, couldn't open module nv [ 4.897] (II) UnloadModule: "nv" [ 4.897] (II) Unloading nv [ 4.897] (EE) Failed to load module "nv" (module does not exist, 0) [ 4.897] (II) LoadModule: "vesa" [ 4.898] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/vesa_drv.so [ 4.898] (II) Module vesa: vendor="X.Org Foundation" [ 4.898] compiled for 1.11.3, module version = 2.3.0 [ 4.898] Module class: X.Org Video Driver [ 4.898] ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 11.0 [ 4.898] (II) UnloadModule: "vesa" [ 4.898] (II) Unloading vesa [ 4.898] (II) Failed to load module "vesa" (already loaded, 0) [ 4.898] (II) LoadModule: "fbdev" [ 4.898] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/fbdev_drv.so [ 4.898] (II) Module fbdev: vendor="X.Org Foundation" [ 4.898] compiled for 1.11.3, module version = 0.4.2 [ 4.898] ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 11.0 [ 4.898] (II) UnloadModule: "fbdev" [ 4.898] (II) Unloading fbdev [ 4.899] (II) Failed to load module "fbdev" (already loaded, 0) [ 4.899] (II) NVIDIA dlloader X Driver 295.40 Thu Apr 5 21:38:35 PDT 2012 [ 4.899] (II) NVIDIA Unified Driver for all Supported NVIDIA GPUs [ 4.899] (II) NOUVEAU driver Date: Wed Sep 12 13:42:43 2012 +0200 [ 4.899] (II) NOUVEAU driver for NVIDIA chipset families : [ 4.899] RIVA TNT (NV04) [ 4.899] RIVA TNT2 (NV05) [ 4.899] GeForce 256 (NV10) [ 4.899] GeForce 2 (NV11, NV15) [ 4.899] GeForce 4MX (NV17, NV18) [ 4.899] GeForce 3 (NV20) [ 4.900] GeForce 4Ti (NV25, NV28) [ 4.900] GeForce FX (NV3x) [ 4.900] GeForce 6 (NV4x) [ 4.900] GeForce 7 (G7x) [ 4.900] GeForce 8 (G8x) [ 4.900] GeForce GTX 200 (NVA0) [ 4.900] GeForce GTX 400 (NVC0) [ 4.900] (II) VESA: driver for VESA chipsets: vesa [ 4.900] (II) FBDEV: driver for framebuffer: fbdev [ 4.900] (++) using VT number 7 [ 4.902] (II) Loading sub module "fb" [ 4.902] (II) LoadModule: "fb" [ 4.902] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/libfb.so [ 4.902] (II) Module fb: vendor="X.Org Foundation" [ 4.902] compiled for 1.11.3, module version = 1.0.0 [ 4.902] ABI class: X.Org ANSI C Emulation, version 0.4 [ 4.902] (II) Loading sub module "wfb" [ 4.902] (II) LoadModule: "wfb" [ 4.903] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/libwfb.so [ 4.905] (II) Module wfb: vendor="X.Org Foundation" [ 4.905] compiled for 1.11.3, module version = 1.0.0 [ 4.905] ABI class: X.Org ANSI C Emulation, version 0.4 [ 4.905] (II) Loading sub module "ramdac" [ 4.905] (II) LoadModule: "ramdac" [ 4.905] (II) Module "ramdac" already built-in [ 4.907] (II) Loading /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/xorg/extra-modules/nvidia_drv.so [ 4.907] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/libwfb.so [ 4.907] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/libfb.so [ 4.912] (WW) Falling back to old probe method for vesa [ 4.912] (WW) Falling back to old probe method for fbdev [ 4.912] (II) Loading sub module "fbdevhw" [ 4.912] (II) LoadModule: "fbdevhw" [ 4.912] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/libfbdevhw.so [ 4.912] (II) Module fbdevhw: vendor="X.Org Foundation" [ 4.912] compiled for 1.11.3, module version = 0.0.2 [ 4.912] ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 11.0 [ 4.912] (II) NVIDIA(0): Creating default Display subsection in Screen section "Default Screen Section" for depth/fbbpp 24/32 [ 4.912] (==) NVIDIA(0): Depth 24, (==) framebuffer bpp 32 [ 4.912] (==) NVIDIA(0): RGB weight 888 [ 4.912] (==) NVIDIA(0): Default visual is TrueColor [ 4.912] (==) NVIDIA(0): Using gamma correction (1.0, 1.0, 1.0) [ 4.912] (**) NVIDIA(0): Enabling 2D acceleration [ 5.442] (EE) NVIDIA(0): Failed to initialize the display subsystem for the NVIDIA [ 5.442] (EE) NVIDIA(0): graphics device! [ 5.442] (EE) NVIDIA(0): Failed to get supported display device(s) [ 5.442] (EE) NVIDIA(0): Failed to initialize dac HAL [ 5.442] (II) UnloadModule: "nvidia" [ 5.442] (II) Unloading nvidia [ 5.442] (II) UnloadModule: "wfb" [ 5.442] (II) Unloading wfb [ 5.442] (II) UnloadModule: "fb" [ 5.443] (II) Unloading fb [ 5.443] (EE) Screen(s) found, but none have a usable configuration. [ 5.443] Fatal server error: [ 5.443] no screens found [ 5.443] Please consult the The X.Org Foundation support at http://wiki.x.org for help. [ 5.443] Please also check the log file at "/var/log/Xorg.0.log" for additional information. [ 5.443] [ 5.447] ddxSigGiveUp: Closing log [ 5.447] Server terminated with error (1). Closing log file.

    Read the article

  • Why is HTML/Javascript minification beneficial

    - by Channel72
    Why is HTML/Javascript minification beneficial when the HTTP protocol already supports gzip data compression? I realize that Javascript/HTML minification has the potential to significantly reduce the size of Javascript/HTML files by removing unnecessary whitespace, and perhaps renaming variables to a few letters each, but doesn't the LZW algorithm do especially well when there are many repeated characters (e.g. lots of whitespace?) I realize that some Javascript minification tools do more than just reduce size. Google's closure compiler, for example, also tries to improve code performance by inlining functions and doing other analyses. But the primary purpose of Javascript minification is usually to reduce file size. I also realize there are other reasons you might want to minify aside from performace, such as code obfuscation. But again, that reason is not usually emphasized as much as performance gain and file size reduction. For example, Closure Compiler is not advertised as an obfuscation tool, but as a code size reducer and download-speed enhancer. So, how much performance do you really gain from Javascript/HTML minification when you're already significantly reducing file size with gzip compression?

    Read the article

  • How important is graceful degradation of JavaScript? [closed]

    - by Stephen
    Should web developers continue to spend effort progressively enhancing our web applications with JavaScript, ensuring that features gracefully degrade, thereby ensuring accessibility? Or should we spend that time focused on new features or other areas of development? The subtext of that question would be: How many of our customers/clients/users utilize our websites or applications with JavaScript disabled? Do you have any projects with requirements that specifically demand JavaScript functionality (almost all of mine do), and do those requirements also demand graceful degradation? For the sake of asking this question, I pulled up programmers.stackexchange.com without JavaScript enabled, and I was greeted with this message: "Programmers - Stack Exchange works best with JavaScript enabled". It was difficult to log in, albeit the site seemed to generally work okay. (I wasn't able to vote up any questions.) I think this is a satisfactory approach to development. Imagine the effort involved in making all of the site's features work with plain old HTML and server-side logic. On the other hand, I wonder how many users have been alienated by this approach. We've all been trained (at least the good developers among us) to use progressive enhancement and to ensure our web applications' dynamic features degrade gracefully. Is this progressive enhancement just pissing into the wind, or do some of our customers actually utilize certain web services without JavaScript enabled?

    Read the article

  • Javascript: Machine Constants Applicable?

    - by DavidB2013
    I write numerical routines for students of science and engineering (although they are freely available for use by anybody else as well) and am wondering how to properly use machine constants in a JavaScript program, or if they are even applicable. For example, say I am writing a program in C++ that numerically computes the roots of the following equation: exp(-0.7x) + sin(3x) - 1.2x + 0.3546 = 0 A root-finding routine should be able to compute roots to within the machine epsilon. In C++, this value is specified by the language: DBL_EPSILON. C++ also specifies the smallest and largest values that can be held by a float or double variable. However, how does this convert to JavaScript? Since a Javascript program runs in a web browser, and I don't know what kind of computer will run the program, and JavaScript does not have corresponding predefined values for these quantities, how can I implement my own version of these constants so that my programs compute results to as much accuracy as allowed on the computer running the web browser? My first draft is to simply copy over the literal constants from C++: FLT_MIN: 1.17549435082229e-038 FLT_MAX: 3.40282346638529e+038 DBL_EPSILON: 2.2204460492503131e-16 I am also willing to write small code blocks that could compute these values for each machine on which the program is run. That way, a supercomputer might compute results to a higher accuracy than an old, low-level, PC. BUT, I don't know if such a routine would actually reach the computer, in which case, I would be wasting my time. Anybody here know how to compute and use (in Javascript) values that correspond to machine constants in a compiled language? Is it worth my time to write small programs in Javascript that compute DBL_EPSILON, FLT_MIN, FLT_MIN, etc. for use in numerical routines? Or am I better off simply assigning literal constants that come straight from C++ on a standard Windows PC?

    Read the article

  • A few questions about how JavaScript works

    - by KayoticSully
    I originally posted on Stack Overflow and was told I might get some better answers here. I have been looking deeply into JavaScript lately to fully understand the language and have a few nagging questions that I can not seem to find answers to (Specifically dealing with Object Oriented programming. I know JavaScript is meant to be used in an OOP manner I just want to understand it for the sake of completeness). Assuming the following code: function TestObject() { this.fA = function() { // do stuff } this.fB = testB; function testB() { // do stuff } } TestObject.prototype = { fC : function { // do stuff } } What is the difference between functions fA and fB? Do they behave exactly the same in scope and potential ability? Is it just convention or is one way technically better or proper? If there is only ever going to be one instance of an object at any given time, would adding a function to the prototype such as fC even be worthwhile? Is there any benefit to doing so? Is the prototype only really useful when dealing with many instances of an object or inheritance? And what is technically the "proper" way to add methods to the prototype the way I have above or calling TestObject.prototype.functionName = function(){} every time? I am looking to keep my JavaScript code as clean and readable as possible but am also very interested in what the proper conventions for Objects are in the language. I come from a Java and PHP background and am trying to not make any assumptions about how JavaScript works since I know it is very different being prototype based. Also are there any definitive JavaScript style guides or documentation about how JavaScript operates at a low level? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Listening and firing events with Javascript and maybe jQuery

    - by at
    In my Javascript and Flex applications, users often perform actions that I want other Javascript code on the page to listen for. For example, if someone adds a friend. I want my Javascript app to then call something like triggerEvent("addedFriend", name);. Then any other code that was listening for the "addedFriend" event will get called along with the name. Is there a built-in Javascript mechanism for handling events? I'm ok with using jQuery for this too and I know jQuery makes extensive use of events. But with jQuery, it seems that its event mechanism is all based around elements. As I understand, you have to tie a custom event to an element. I guess I can do that to a dummy element, but my need has nothing to do with DOM elements on a webpage. Should I just implement this event mechanism myself?

    Read the article

  • Executing Javascript without a browser?

    - by Daniel
    I am looking into Javascript programming without a browser. I want to run scripts from the Linux or Mac OS X command line, much like we run any other scripting language (ruby, php, perl, python...) $ javascript my_javascript_code.js I looked into spider monkey (Mozilla) and v8 (Google), but both of these appear to be embedded. Is anyone using Javascript as a scripting language to be executed from the command line? If anyone is curious why I am looking into this, I've been poking around node.js

    Read the article

  • Javascript Application Book

    - by Jormundir
    Can anyone recommend a good book on Javascript module/application development. I'm a Software Engineer, so I don't need all the intro to programming stuff. What I'm really looking for is: How do you bundle the html/css/javascript together so that you can make one include that will load the whole application. I.e.: <div id="myapplication"></div> ... ... <script src="myapplication.js"> Design patterns are always welcome. I've already read Javascript the good parts, and online guides, but it's hard to find a comprehensive guide/tutorial for specifically this. There's a lot of good "this is a javascript application" and "this is a scalable framework", but I haven't had any luck with "This is how you build a javascript application, including the html and css, and this is how you deliver it nicely". I'm building a small application to start, so I'm not interested in scalability and large-scale development practices, just a nice and comprehensive guide to get me off the ground.

    Read the article

  • Should I be using a JavaScript SPA designed when security is important

    - by ryanzec
    I asked something kind of similar on stackoverflow with a particular piece of code however I want to try to ask this in a broader sense. So I have this web application that I have started to write in backbone using a Single Page Architecture (SPA) however I am starting to second guess myself because of security. Now we are not storing and sending credit card information or anything like that through this web application but we are storing sensitive information that people are uploading to us and will have the ability to re-download too. The obviously security concern that I have with JavaScript is that you can't trust anything that comes from JavaScript however in a Backbone SPA application, everything is being sent through JavaScript. There are two security features that I will have to build in JavaScript; permissions and authentication. The authentication piece is just me override the Backbone.Router.prototype.navigate method to check the fragment it is trying to load and if the JavaScript application.session.loggedIn is not set to true (and they are not viewing a none authenticated page), they are redirected to the login page automatically. The user could easily modify application.session.loggedIn to equal true (or modify Backbone.Router.prototype.navigate method) but then they would also have to not so easily dynamically embedded a link into the page (or modify a current one) that has the proper classes, data-* attributes, and href values to then load a page that should only be loaded when they user has logged in (and has the permissions). So I have an acl object that deals with the permissions stuff. All someone would have to do to view pages or parts of pages they should not be able to is to call acl.addPermission(resource, permission) with the proper permissions or modify the acl.hasPermission() to always return true and then navigate away and then back to the page. Now certain things is EMCAScript 5 like Object.seal() or Object.freeze() would help with some of this however we have to support IE 8 which does not support those pieces of functionality. Now the REST API also performs security checks on every request so technically even if they are able to see parts of the interface that they should not be able to, they still should not be able to actually affect any data. The main benefits for me in developing a JavaScript SPA application is that the application is a lot more responsive since it is only transferring the minimum amount of JSON data for the requested action and performing the minimum amount of work too. There are also other things that I think are beneficial like you are going to have to develop an API for the data (which is good if you want expand your application to different platforms/technologies) or their is more of a separation between front-end and back-end however if security is a concern, it is really wise to go down the road of a JavaScript SPA application for the front-end?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >