Search Results

Search found 2486 results on 100 pages for 'keyword expansion'.

Page 3/100 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

  • Boost Your SEO With Good Keyword Research

    Once you get into the search engine optimization game, you'll learn all types of basic principles. Emphasizing your keyword in code is one. Stressing Your Keyword For SEO. Keywords are the key, pun supposed, to search engine optimization. You must develop an understanding of what your projections are wanting for in your space of business. Keyword research is the method for doing this and a step that should be conducted with nice precision and effort.

    Read the article

  • Keyword Generator Tool Gets Your Ahead of the Competition

    A keyword generator tool provides ideas that website owners and search engine optimizers use for site and engine optimization. Key phrase generators rely on search query popularity from introductory keywords to a more complex keyword search management to drive more traffic to a website. It maximizes prospective and potential high-traffic keywords and integrates it with your sites campaign techniques. Keyword generator tool allows you to manage and add "exact match" and "phrase match" keywords to your lists, also allows you to create misspellings, combine and reverse keywords then automatically calculates the ad group focus score of your keyword lists.

    Read the article

  • Keyword Research - Most Important SEO Method

    Keyword optimization involves proper keyword choice and positioning based on comprehensive keyword research. It's likely you have an excellent site and effective programming to support your site however all these will be of no avail if you do not obtain presence within the search engines. You will not get the desired return of investment if the site does not make it to the search engines.

    Read the article

  • An Introduction to Keyword Research

    Everyone knows that good keyword research is one of the keys to getting people to go to your website. When they type in certain search keywords or keyword phrases, you want them to find you! Here's an introduction to keyword research.

    Read the article

  • C Minishell Command Expansion Printing Gibberish

    - by Optimus_Pwn
    I'm writing a unix minishell in C, and am at the point where I'm adding command expansion. What I mean by this is that I can nest commands in other commands, for example: $> echo hello $(echo world! ... $(echo and stuff)) hello world! ... and stuff I think I have it working mostly, however it isn't marking the end of the expanded string correctly, for example if I do: $> echo a $(echo b $(echo c)) a b c $> echo d $(echo e) d e c See it prints the c, even though I didn't ask it to. Here is my code: msh.c - http://pastebin.com/sd6DZYwB expand.c - http://pastebin.com/uLqvFGPw I have a more code, but there's a lot of it, and these are the parts that I'm having trouble with at the moment. I'll try to tell you the basic way I'm doing this. Main is in msh.c, here it gets a line of input from either the commandline or a shellfile, and then calls processline (char *line, int outFD, int waitFlag), where line is the line we just got, outFD is the file descriptor of the output file, and waitFlag tells us whether or not we should wait if we fork. When we call this from main we do it like this: processline (buffer, 1, 1); In processline, we allocate a new line: char expanded_line[EXPANDEDLEN]; We then call expand, in expand.c: expand(line, expanded_line, EXPANDEDLEN); In expand, we copy the characters literally from line to expanded_line until we find a $(, which then calls: static int expCmdOutput(char *orig, char *new, int *oldl_ind, int *newl_ind) orig is line, and new is expanded line. oldl_ind and newl_ind are the current positions in the line and expanded line, respectively. Then we pipe, and recursively call processline, passing it the nested command(for example, if we had "echo a $(echo b)", we would pass processline "echo b"). This is where I get confused, each time expand is called, is it allocating a new chunk of memory EXPANDEDLEN long? If so, this is bad because I'll run out of stack room really quickly(in the case of a hugely nested commandline input). In expand I insert a null character at the end of the expanded string, so why is it printing past it? If you guys need any more code, or explanations, just ask. Secondly, I put the code in pastebin because there's a ton of it, and in my experience people don't like it when I fill up several pages with code. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • this keyword as a property

    - by viky
    I know c# well, but it is something strange for me. In some old program, I have seen this code: public MyType this[string name] { ......some code that finally return instance of MyType } How it is called? What is the use of this?

    Read the article

  • Problem with extern keyword in C++

    - by Jeff
    What's the difference between the following two declarations? I thought they were equivalent, but the first sample works, and the second does not. I mean it compiles and runs, but the bitmap display code shows blank. I have not stepped through it yet, but am I missing something obvious? GUI_BITMAP is a simple structure describing a bitmap. This is for VC++ 2005, but I think it fails in VC++ 2008 also. Scratching my head on this one... Sample 1: extern "C" const GUI_BITMAP bmkeyA_cap_active; extern "C" const GUI_BITMAP bmkeyA_cap_inactive; Sample 2: extern "C" { const GUI_BITMAP bmkeyA_cap_active; const GUI_BITMAP bmkeyA_cap_inactive; };

    Read the article

  • Selecting a column that is also a keyword in MySQL

    - by randall123
    For some reason, the developers at a new company I'm working for decided to name their columns "ignore" and "exists". Now when I run MySQL queries with those words in the where clause, I get a syntax error; however, I can't seem to figure out how to reference those columns without running into an error. I tried setting them as strings, but that doesn't make any sense. Help? Also, is there a term for this kind of mismatch?

    Read the article

  • identifier token keyword antlr parser

    - by batman_for
    How to handle the case where the token 'for' is used in two different situations in the language to parse? Such as statement and as a "parameter" as the following example: echo for print example for i in {0..10..2} do echo "Welcome $i times" done Output: for print example Welcome 0 times Welcome 2 times Welcome 4 times Welcome 6 times Welcome 8 times Welcome 10 times Thanks.

    Read the article

  • C# - Dynamic Keyword and Interface Implementations

    - by Adam Driscoll
    I'm assuming this isn't possible but before digging further is there a way to do something like this: public void ProcessInterface(ISomeInterface obj) {} //... dynamic myDyn = GetDynamic<ISomeInterface>() ProcessInterface(myDyn); I've seen a post arguing for it but it sounds like it wasn't included. A little context: .Net assembly exposed through COM - Silverlight app consuming interface-implementing classes. Would be nice to refer to the objects by interface. I really don't expect that this was what was intended...

    Read the article

  • problem Keyword token antlr

    - by batman_for
    If the 'for' is used both as a command and as "the English word": for_statement: 'for' ... id: 'for' | ID ; ID: ... right? My problem is how to differentiate the two cases. For example for_statement is only possible beginning of a line (only if preceded by ' ' or '\t'). Thanks.

    Read the article

  • 12c - SQL Text Expansion

    - by noreply(at)blogger.com (Thomas Kyte)
    Here is another small but very useful new feature in Oracle Database 12c - SQL Text Expansion.  It will come in handy in two cases:You are asked to tune what looks like a simple query - maybe a two table join with simple predicates.  But it turns out the two tables are each views of views of views and so on... In other words, you've been asked to 'tune' a 15 page query, not a two liner.You are asked to take a look at a query against tables with VPD (virtual private database) policies.  In order words, you have no idea what you are trying to 'tune'.A new function, EXPAND_SQL_TEXT, in the DBMS_UTILITY package makes seeing what the "real" SQL is quite easy. For example - take the common view ALL_USERS - we can now:ops$tkyte%ORA12CR1> variable x clobops$tkyte%ORA12CR1> begin  2          dbms_utility.expand_sql_text  3          ( input_sql_text => 'select * from all_users',  4            output_sql_text => :x );  5  end;  6  /PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.ops$tkyte%ORA12CR1> print xX--------------------------------------------------------------------------------SELECT "A1"."USERNAME" "USERNAME","A1"."USER_ID" "USER_ID","A1"."CREATED" "CREATED","A1"."COMMON" "COMMON" FROM  (SELECT "A4"."NAME" "USERNAME","A4"."USER#" "USER_ID","A4"."CTIME" "CREATED",DECODE(BITAND("A4"."SPARE1",128),128,'YES','NO') "COMMON" FROM "SYS"."USER$" "A4","SYS"."TS$" "A3","SYS"."TS$" "A2" WHERE "A4"."DATATS#"="A3"."TS#" AND "A4"."TEMPTS#"="A2"."TS#" AND "A4"."TYPE#"=1) "A1"Now it is easy to see what query is really being executed at runtime - regardless of how many views of views you might have.  You can see the expanded text - and that will probably lead you to the conclusion that maybe that 27 table join to 25 tables you don't even care about might better be written as a two table join.Further, if you've ever tried to figure out what a VPD policy might be doing to your SQL, you know it was hard to do at best.  Christian Antognini wrote up a way to sort of see it - but you never get to see the entire SQL statement: http://www.antognini.ch/2010/02/tracing-vpd-predicates/.  But now with this function - it becomes rather trivial to see the expanded SQL - after the VPD has been applied.  We can see this by setting up a small table with a VPD policy ops$tkyte%ORA12CR1> create table my_table  2  (  data        varchar2(30),  3     OWNER       varchar2(30) default USER  4  )  5  /Table created.ops$tkyte%ORA12CR1> create or replace  2  function my_security_function( p_schema in varchar2,  3                                 p_object in varchar2 )  4  return varchar2  5  as  6  begin  7     return 'owner = USER';  8  end;  9  /Function created.ops$tkyte%ORA12CR1> begin  2     dbms_rls.add_policy  3     ( object_schema   => user,  4       object_name     => 'MY_TABLE',  5       policy_name     => 'MY_POLICY',  6       function_schema => user,  7       policy_function => 'My_Security_Function',  8       statement_types => 'select, insert, update, delete' ,  9       update_check    => TRUE ); 10  end; 11  /PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.And then expanding a query against it:ops$tkyte%ORA12CR1> begin  2          dbms_utility.expand_sql_text  3          ( input_sql_text => 'select * from my_table',  4            output_sql_text => :x );  5  end;  6  /PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.ops$tkyte%ORA12CR1> print xX--------------------------------------------------------------------------------SELECT "A1"."DATA" "DATA","A1"."OWNER" "OWNER" FROM  (SELECT "A2"."DATA" "DATA","A2"."OWNER" "OWNER" FROM "OPS$TKYTE"."MY_TABLE" "A2" WHERE "A2"."OWNER"=USER@!) "A1"Not an earth shattering new feature - but extremely useful in certain cases.  I know I'll be using it when someone asks me to look at a query that looks simple but has a twenty page plan associated with it!

    Read the article

  • How to make the start menu finds a program based on a custom keyword?

    - by Pierre-Alain Vigeant
    I am searching for a way to type a keyword in the start menu Search programs and files field and that it will return the application that match the keyword. An example will better explain this: Suppose that I want to start the powershell. Currently what I can type in the search field is power and the first item that appear is the 64bits powershell shortcut. Now suppose that I'd like ps to return powershell as the first item of the search list. Currently, typing ps return all files with the .ps extension, alongs with a control panel options about recording steps but not the powershell executable itself. How can I do that?

    Read the article

  • keyword stuffing in SEO

    - by Andrej
    i have a web shop, and on some of the pages some keyword in used a bit more then on the others. for eg. "hp toner" is used preety much in the discription of the product, in the alt tag, in the brand, and so on, an if i have let's say 100 of these products on the "HP PAGE", that means that "hp toner" is gonna show up at least 200 times more than some other rendom word... but the keyword stuffing is not intentional here.. it's just that, the quantity of the product is bigger, and so is that word that describes it.. is that considered keyword stuffing in SEO terms?

    Read the article

  • 301 redirect, keyword being in bold

    - by seo-man
    Regarding 301; If I redirect nonwww to www domain with 301 redirect, do I still have to determinate inside google webmaster tools which version (www or nonwww) is prefered? Or is setting up redirect enough so therefore I don't need to determinate that inside GWT? Regarding keyword being in bold: Usually keywords are supposted to be in bold font and it is irrelevant if they are links or not. But in heading (h1, h2); does there keyword also need to be in bold or is it enough if I care to put it to the beginning of heading? So elsehow asked; Does the keyword in heading need to be in bold font also?

    Read the article

  • Oracle Remarketer Level expansion in China

    - by martin.morganti(at)oracle.com
    Remarketer Level continues to expand and develop in Oracle's Asia Pacific region. Following the launch of Remarketer level in Korea and Taiwan earlier in FY11, it is great news to see the number of Remarketer VAD partners in China continue to increase. Recent weeks have seen Beijing Futong Dongfang Technology Co.,Ltd. and Digital China (China) Limited both execute the Remarketer VAD addendum. We are delighted that this takes the total of our Remarketer VADs in China to four. This means that we now have even broader coverage to address the opportunity that Remarketer level presents Oracle and our VAD remarketer partners. So welcome to our two latest additions. To find out who are the Remarketer VAD partners in your country, the latest list is posted at here.

    Read the article

  • Website Health Check - Keyword Blunders - Part 2

    Website Health Check is becoming an integral part of Search Engine Optimization (SEO). The reason is that it helps to find mistakes in websites that are commonly unnoticed. Eventually, it means the difference between coming up as the first or last result in a search engine query. A small part regarding keywords, such as keyword density, keyword stuffing, spelling errors, cloaking, etc., is explained here.

    Read the article

  • Using Keyword Analysis to Write Articles and Blogs

    Keyword analysis is a process by which you can discover what search phases are used at search engines by users for find information. Keywords are nothing but search words or phrases entered by users at search engines like Google, Yahoo and Bing. For article, blog and web content writers, keyword research is the most important part of the process.

    Read the article

  • Search Engine Keyword Optimization - The Best Online Marketing Strategy

    Online business people dreams are fulfilled when they succeed in search engine keyword optimization. It is always a pleasure when out of 79,000,000 advertisers competing for a certain keyword; you find your website or article appearing on the first page of Google. Apart from Google, the other places to concentrate on in order to generate organic traffic are MSN, Yahoo and Bing.

    Read the article

  • Keyword Research - Why Bother?

    "Every long journey, starts with a single step" says Confucius. And with every successful SEO campaign, one must start with proper keyword research. Keyword research is more than just knowing which keywords to use for a campaign, it also determines the direction of your campaign in relation to whatever key phrase you are targeting.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >