Search Results

Search found 218 results on 9 pages for 'rounding'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 3/9 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9  | Next Page >

  • How to round a number to n decimal places in Java

    - by Alex Spurling
    What I'd like is a method to convert a double to a string which rounds using the half-up method. I.e. if the decimal to be rounded is a 5, it always rounds up the previous number. This is the standard method of rounding most people expect in most situations. I also would like only significant digits to be displayed. That is there should not be any trailing zeroes. I know one method of doing this is to use the String.format method: String.format("%.5g%n", 0.912385); returns: 0.91239 which is great, however it always displays numbers with 5 decimal places even if they are not significant: String.format("%.5g%n", 0.912300); returns: 0.91230 Another method is to use the DecimalFormatter: DecimalFormat df = new DecimalFormat("#.#####"); df.format(0.912385); returns: 0.91238 However as you can see this uses half-even rounding. That is it will round down if the previous digit is even. What I'd like is this: 0.912385 -> 0.91239 0.912300 -> 0.9123 What is the best way to achieve this in Java?

    Read the article

  • Why can't c# calculate exact values of mathematical functions

    - by Timo Willemsen
    Hey everyone, Why can't c# do any exact operations. Math.Pow(Math.Sqrt(2.0),2) == 2.0000000000000004 I know how doubles work, I know where the rounding error is from, I know that it's almost the correct value, and I know that you can't store infinite numbers in a finite double. But why isn't there a way that c# can calculate it exactly, while my calculator can do it. Edit It's not about my calculator, I was just giving an example: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Sqrt%282.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001%29%5E2 Cheers

    Read the article

  • round() for float in C++

    - by Roddy
    I need a simple floating point rounding function, thus: double round(double); round(0.1) = 0 round(-0.1) = 0 round(-0.9) = -1 I can find ceil() and floor() in the math.h - but not round(). Is it present in the standard C++ library under another name, or is it missing??

    Read the article

  • toFixed(2) - math round ?

    - by adrien334
    Hi, I would like to find a function that will return this kind of formatted values : 1.5555 => 1.55 1.5556 => 1.56 1.5554 => 1.55 1.5651 => 1.56 toFixed() and math round return this value : 1.5651.fixedTo(2) => 1.57 This will be usefull for money rounding.

    Read the article

  • PHP given a series of arbitrary numbers, how can I choose a logical max value on a line graph?

    - by stormist
    I am constructing a line graph in PHP. I was setting the max value of the line graph to the max value of my collection of items, but this ended up making the graph less readable you are unable to view the highest line on the graph as it intersects with the top of it. So what I need is basically a formula to take a set of numbers and calculate what the logical max value of on the line graph should be.. so some examples 3500 250 10049 45394 434 312 Max value on line graph should probably be 50000 493 412 194 783 457 344 max value on line graph would ideally be 1000 545 649 6854 5485 11545 In this case, 12000 makes sense as max value So something as simple as rounding upward to the nearest thousandth might work but I'd need it to progressively increase as the numbers got bigger. (50000 instead of 46,000 in first example) The maximum these numbers will ever be is about a million. Any recommendations would be greatly appreciated, thank you.

    Read the article

  • System.Math.Round bug?

    - by Jeevan
    Hi All, I was writing a function for rounding a number to two places. And I found a bug when I was trying to round specific values. So, I ran the code: class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { int limit = 100; for (int number = 0; number <= limit; number++) { Console.WriteLine((System.Math.Round((double)(number+0.995),2,MidpointRounding.AwayFromZero))); } } } And I found that: 8.99 9.99 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 32.99 33.99 34.99 35.99 36.99 37.99 38.99 39.99 numbers are not rounded to their next value. When I run the same code till 1500: I get the numbers: 8.99 9.99 32.99 33.99 34.99 35.99 36.99 37.99 38.99 39.99 1024.99 1025.99 1026.99 1027.99 1028.99 1029.99 1030.99 1031.99 1032.99 1033.99 1034.99 1035.99 1036.99 1037.99 1038.99 1039.99 1040.99 1041.99 1042.99 1043.99 1044.99 1045.99 1046.99 1047.99 1048.99 1049.99 1050.99 1051.99 1052.99 1053.99 1054.99 1055.99 1056.99 1057.99 1058.99 1059.99 1060.99 1061.99 1062.99 1063.99 1064.99 1065.99 1066.99 1067.99 1068.99 1069.99 1070.99 1071.99 1072.99 1073.99 1074.99 1075.99 1076.99 1077.99 1078.99 1079.99 1080.99 1081.99 1082.99 1083.99 1084.99 1085.99 1086.99 1087.99 1088.99 1089.99 1090.99 1091.99 1092.99 1093.99 1094.99 1095.99 1096.99 1097.99 1098.99 1099.99 1100.99 1101.99 1102.99 1103.99 1104.99 1105.99 1106.99 1107.99 1108.99 1109.99 1110.99 1111.99 1112.99 1113.99 1114.99 1115.99 1116.99 1117.99 1118.99 1119.99 1120.99 1121.99 1122.99 1123.99 1124.99 1125.99 1126.99 1127.99 1128.99 1129.99 1130.99 1131.99 1132.99 1133.99 1134.99 1135.99 1136.99 1137.99 1138.99 1139.99 1140.99 1141.99 1142.99 1143.99 1144.99 1145.99 1146.99 1147.99 1148.99 1149.99 1150.99 1151.99 1152.99 1153.99 1154.99 1155.99 1156.99 1157.99 1158.99 1159.99 1160.99 1161.99 1162.99 1163.99 1164.99 1165.99 1166.99 1167.99 1168.99 1169.99 1170.99 1171.99 1172.99 1173.99 1174.99 1175.99 1176.99 1177.99 1178.99 1179.99 1180.99 1181.99 1182.99 1183.99 1184.99 1185.99 1186.99 1187.99 1188.99 1189.99 1190.99 1191.99 1192.99 1193.99 1194.99 1195.99 1196.99 1197.99 1198.99 1199.99 1200.99 1201.99 1202.99 1203.99 1204.99 1205.99 1206.99 1207.99 1208.99 1209.99 1210.99 1211.99 1212.99 1213.99 1214.99 1215.99 1216.99 1217.99 1218.99 1219.99 1220.99 1221.99 1222.99 1223.99 1224.99 1225.99 1226.99 1227.99 1228.99 1229.99 1230.99 1231.99 1232.99 1233.99 1234.99 1235.99 1236.99 1237.99 1238.99 1239.99 1240.99 1241.99 1242.99 1243.99 1244.99 1245.99 1246.99 1247.99 1248.99 1249.99 1250.99 1251.99 1252.99 1253.99 1254.99 1255.99 1256.99 1257.99 1258.99 1259.99 1260.99 1261.99 1262.99 1263.99 1264.99 1265.99 1266.99 1267.99 1268.99 1269.99 1270.99 1271.99 1272.99 1273.99 1274.99 1275.99 1276.99 1277.99 1278.99 1279.99 1280.99 1281.99 1282.99 1283.99 1284.99 1285.99 1286.99 1287.99 1288.99 1289.99 1290.99 1291.99 1292.99 1293.99 1294.99 1295.99 1296.99 1297.99 1298.99 1299.99 1300.99 1301.99 1302.99 1303.99 1304.99 1305.99 1306.99 1307.99 1308.99 1309.99 which are not rounded to next number! Has anyone any idea about why its happening for these specific numbers!

    Read the article

  • Common strategies to deal with rounding errors in currency-intensive soft?

    - by Max
    What is your advice on: compensation of accumulated error in bulk math operations on collections of Money objects. How is this implemented in your production code? (things like variable rounding, etc...) theory behind rounding in accountancy. any literature on topic. I currently read Fowler. He mentions Money type, but says nothing on strategies. Older posts on money-rounding (here, and here) do not provide a details and formality I need. Thanks for help.

    Read the article

  • What Determines the Default Setting of the x87 FPU Control Word?

    - by Rick Regan
    What determines the default setting of the x87 FPU control word -- specifically, the precision control field? Does the compiler set it based on the target processor? Is there a compiler option to change it? Using Microsoft Visual C++ 2008 Express Edition on an Intel Core Duo processor, the default setting for the precision control field is "01b", meaning double (53 bit) precision. I'm wondering -- why is the default not "11"b, or extended (64 bit) precision? (I know I can change it using _controlfp.)

    Read the article

  • getting Ceil() of Decimal in python?

    - by Gunjan
    Is there a way to get the ceil of a high precision Decimal in python? >>> import decimal; >>> decimal.Decimal(800000000000000000001)/100000000000000000000 Decimal('8.00000000000000000001') >>> math.ceil(decimal.Decimal(800000000000000000001)/100000000000000000000) 8.0 math rounds the value and returns non precise value

    Read the article

  • Getting sign of an integer in Assembly

    - by Sagekilla
    Hi all, I'm writing some assembly for a project using MASM (32-bit), and I was wondering what would be the easiest way to do this: int delta = A - B; int value = floor((delta + sign(delta)) / 2); Which is basically the following mapping: For 1 < A < 9, and B = 5: A = [1, 2] -> -2 A = [3, 4] -> -1 A = [5] -> 0 A = [6, 7] -> +1 A = [8, 9] -> +1 Any help is much appreciated!

    Read the article

  • round number in JavaScript to N decimal places

    - by Richard
    in JavaScript, the typical way to round a number to N decimal places is something like: function round_number(num, dec) { return Math.round(num * Math.pow(10, dec)) / Math.pow(10, dec); } However this approach will round to a maximum of N decimal places while I want to always round to N decimal places. For example "2.0" would be rounded to "2". Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • Why is my number being rounded incorrectly?

    - by izb
    This feels like the kind of code that only fails in-situ, but I will attempt to adapt it into a code snippet that represents what I'm seeing. float f = myFloat * myConstInt; /* Where myFloat==13.45, and myConstInt==20 */ int i = (int)f; int i2 = (int)(myFloat * myConstInt); After stepping through the code, i==269, and i2==268. What's going on here to account for the difference?

    Read the article

  • Step math function

    - by ekapek
    Hi I need function which returns: for any number from range = result [0.001,0.01) => 0.01 [0.01,0.1) => 0.1 [0.1,1) => 1 [1,10) => 10 [10,100) => 100 etc. My first idea was to use if, but this the worst way. Is there a simple solution?

    Read the article

  • Round date to 10 minutes interval

    - by Peter Lang
    I have a DATE column that I want to round to the next-lower 10 minute interval in a query (see example below). I managed to do it by truncating the seconds and then subtracting the last digit of minutes. WITH test_data AS ( SELECT TO_DATE('2010-01-01 10:00:00', 'YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS') d FROM dual UNION SELECT TO_DATE('2010-01-01 10:05:00', 'YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS') d FROM dual UNION SELECT TO_DATE('2010-01-01 10:09:59', 'YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS') d FROM dual UNION SELECT TO_DATE('2010-01-01 10:10:00', 'YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS') d FROM dual UNION SELECT TO_DATE('2099-01-01 10:00:33', 'YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS') d FROM dual ) -- #end of test-data SELECT d, TRUNC(d, 'MI') - MOD(TO_CHAR(d, 'MI'), 10) / (24 * 60) FROM test_data And here is the result: 01.01.2010 10:00:00    01.01.2010 10:00:00 01.01.2010 10:05:00    01.01.2010 10:00:00 01.01.2010 10:09:59    01.01.2010 10:00:00 01.01.2010 10:10:00    01.01.2010 10:10:00 01.01.2099 10:00:33    01.01.2099 10:00:00 Works as expected, but is there a better way? EDIT: I was curious about performance, so I did the following test with 500.000 rows and (not really) random dates. I am going to add the results as comments to the provided solutions. DECLARE t TIMESTAMP := SYSTIMESTAMP; BEGIN FOR i IN ( WITH test_data AS ( SELECT SYSDATE + ROWNUM / 5000 d FROM dual CONNECT BY ROWNUM <= 500000 ) SELECT TRUNC(d, 'MI') - MOD(TO_CHAR(d, 'MI'), 10) / (24 * 60) FROM test_data ) LOOP NULL; END LOOP; dbms_output.put_line( SYSTIMESTAMP - t ); END; This approach took 03.24 s.

    Read the article

  • How to round-off hours based on Minutes(hours+0 if min<30, hours+1 otherwise) ?

    - by infant programmer
    I need to round-off the hours based on the minutes in a DateTime variable. The condition is: if minutes are less than 30, then minutes must be set to zero and no changes to hours, else if minutes =30, then hours must be set to hours+1 and minutes are again set to zero. Seconds are ignored. example: 11/08/2008 04:30:49 should become 11/08/2008 05:00:00 and 11/08/2008 04:29:49 should become 11/08/2008 04:00:00 I have written code which works perfectly fine, but just wanted to know a better method if could be written and also would appreciate alternative method(s). string date1 = "11/08/2008 04:30:49"; DateTime startTime; DateTime.TryParseExact(date1, "MM/dd/yyyy HH:mm:ss", null, System.Globalization.DateTimeStyles.None, out startTime); if (Convert.ToInt32((startTime.Minute.ToString())) > 29) { startTime = DateTime.Parse(string.Format("{0}/{1}/{2} {3}:{4}:{5}", startTime.Month.ToString(), startTime.Day.ToString(), startTime.Year.ToString(), startTime.Hour.ToString(), "00", "00")); startTime = startTime.Add(TimeSpan.Parse("01:00:00")); Console.WriteLine("startTime is :: {0}", startTime.ToString("MM/dd/yyyy HH:mm:ss")); } else { startTime = DateTime.Parse(string.Format("{0}/{1}/{2} {3}:{4}:{5}", startTime.Month.ToString(), startTime.Day.ToString(), startTime.Year.ToString(), startTime.Hour.ToString(), "00", "00")); Console.WriteLine("startTime is :: {0}", startTime.ToString("MM/dd/yyyy HH:mm:ss")); }

    Read the article

  • C code to round numbers

    - by webgenius
    Is there any way to round numbers in C? I do not want to use ceil and floor. Is there any other alternative? I came across this code snippet when I Googled for the answer: (int)(num < 0 ? (num - 0.5) : (num + 0.5)) The above line always prints the value as 4 even when float num =4.9. Please suggest a solution.

    Read the article

  • Why does AddMilliseconds round the double paramater?

    - by fearofawhackplanet
    DateTime.Now.AddMilliseconds(1.5); // adds 2 milliseconds What on earth were they thinking here? It strikes me as horrendously bad practice to create a method that takes a double if it doesn't handle fractional values. Why didn't they implement this with a call to AddTicks and handle the fraction properly? Or at least take an int, so it's transparent to callers? I'm guessing there must be a good reason why they implemented it this way, but I can't think of what it could be. Can anyone offer any insight?

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9  | Next Page >