Search Results

Search found 3493 results on 140 pages for 'constructor'.

Page 31/140 | < Previous Page | 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38  | Next Page >

• Inereritance of clousure objects and overriding of methods

  - by bobikk

  I need to extend a class, which is encapsulated in a closure. This base class is following: var PageController = (function(){ // private static variable var _current_view; return function(request, new_view) { ... // priveleged public function, which has access to the _current_view this.execute = function() { alert("PageController::execute"); } } })();` Inheritance is realised using the following function: function extend(subClass, superClass){ var F = function(){ }; F.prototype = superClass.prototype; subClass.prototype = new F(); subClass.prototype.constructor = subClass; subClass.superclass = superClass.prototype; StartController.cache = ''; if (superClass.prototype.constructor == Object.prototype.constructor) { superClass.prototype.constructor = superClass; } } I subclass the PageController: var StartController = function(request){ // calling the constructor of the super class StartController.superclass.constructor.call(this, request, 'start-view'); } // extending the objects extend(StartController, PageController); // overriding the PageController::execute StartController.prototype.execute = function() { alert('StartController::execute'); } Inheritance is working. I can call every PageController's method from StartController's instance. However, method overriding doesn't work: var startCont = new StartController(); startCont.execute(); alerts "PageController::execute". How should I override this method?

  Read the article

• Any workarounds for non-static member array initialization?

  - by TomiJ

  In C++, it's not possible to initialize array members in the initialization list, thus member objects should have default constructors and they should be properly initialized in the constructor. Is there any (reasonable) workaround for this apart from not using arrays? [Anything that can be initialized using only the initialization list is in our application far preferable to using the constructor, as that data can be allocated and initialized by the compiler and linker, and every CPU clock cycle counts, even before main. However, it is not always possible to have a default constructor for every class, and besides, reinitializing the data again in the constructor rather defeats the purpose anyway.] E.g. I'd like to have something like this (but this one doesn't work): class OtherClass { private: int data; public: OtherClass(int i) : data(i) {}; // No default constructor! }; class Foo { private: OtherClass inst[3]; // Array size fixed and known ahead of time. public: Foo(...) : inst[0](0), inst[1](1), inst[2](2) {}; }; The only workaround I'm aware of is the non-array one: class Foo { private: OtherClass inst0; OtherClass inst1; OtherClass inst2; OtherClass *inst[3]; public: Foo(...) : inst0(0), inst1(1), inst2(2) { inst[0]=&inst0; inst[1]=&inst1; inst[2]=&inst2; }; }; Edit: It should be stressed that OtherClass has no default constructor, and that it is very desirable to have the linker be able to allocate any memory needed (one or more static instances of Foo will be created), using the heap is essentially verboten. I've updated the examples above to highlight the first point.

  Read the article

• Unity and Object Creation

  - by William

  I am using unity as my IoC container. I am trying to implement a type of IProviderRepository. The concrete implementation has a constructor that accepts a type of IRepository. When I remove the constructor parameter from the concrete implementation everything works fine. I am sure the container is wired correctly. When I try to create the concrete object with the constructor I receive the following error: "The current build operation (build key Build Key[EMRGen.Infrastructure.Data.IRepository1[EMRGen.Model.Provider.Provider], null]) failed: The current type, EMRGen.Infrastructure.Data.IRepository1[EMRGen.Model.Provider.Provider], is an interface and cannot be constructed. Are you missing a type mapping? (Strategy type BuildPlanStrategy, index 3)". Is it possible to achieve the above mention functionality with Unity? Namely have Unity infer a concrete type from the Interface and also inject the constructor of the concrete type with the appropriate concrete object based on constructor parameters. Below is sample of my types defined in Unity and a skeleton class listing for what I want to achieve. IProviderRepository is implemented by ProviderRepository which has a constructor that expects a type of IRepository. <typeAlias alias="ProviderRepositoryInterface" type="EMRGen.Model.Provider.IProviderRepository, EMRGen.Model" /> <typeAlias alias="ProviderRepositoryConcrete" type="EMRGen.Infrastructure.Repositories.Providers.ProviderRepository, EMRGen.Infrastructure.Repositories" /> <typeAlias alias="ProviderGenericRepositoryInterface" type="EMRGen.Infrastructure.Data.IRepository`1[[EMRGen.Model.Provider.IProvider, EMRGen.Model]], EMRGen.Infrastructure" /> <typeAlias alias="ProviderGenericRepositoryConcrete" type="EMRGen.Infrastructure.Repositories.EntityFramework.ApplicationRepository`1[[EMRGen.Model.Provider.Provider, EMRGen.Model]], EMRGen.Infrastructure.Repositories" /> <!-- Provider Mapping--> <typeAlias alias="ProviderInterface" type="EMRGen.Model.Provider.IProvider, EMRGen.Model" /> <typeAlias alias="ProviderConcrete" type="EMRGen.Model.Provider.Doctor, EMRGen.Model" /> //Illustrate the call being made inside my class public class PrescriptionService { PrescriptionService() { IUnityContainer uc = UnitySingleton.Instance.Container; UnityServiceLocator unityServiceLocator = new UnityServiceLocator(uc); ServiceLocator.SetLocatorProvider(() => unityServiceLocator); IProviderRepository pRepository = ServiceLocator.Current.GetInstance<IProviderRepository>(); } } public class GenericRepository<IProvider> : IRepository<IProvider> { } public class ProviderRepository : IProviderRepository { private IRepository<IProvider> _genericProviderRepository; //Explict public default constructor public ProviderRepository(IRepository<IProvider> genericProviderRepository) { _genericProviderRepository = genericProviderRepository; } }

  Read the article

• Checking preconditions or not

  - by Robert Dailey

  I've been wanting to find a solid answer to the question of whether or not to have runtime checks to validate input for the purposes of ensuring a client has stuck to their end of the agreement in design by contract. For example, consider a simple class constructor: class Foo { public: Foo( BarHandle bar ) { FooHandle handle = GetFooHandle( bar ); if( handle == NULL ) { throw std::exception( "invalid FooHandle" ); } } }; I would argue in this case that a user should not attempt to construct a Foo without a valid BarHandle. It doesn't seem right to verify that bar is valid inside of Foo's constructor. If I simply document that Foo's constructor requires a valid BarHandle, isn't that enough? Is this a proper way to enforce my precondition in design by contract? So far, everything I've read has mixed opinions on this. It seems like 50% of people would say to verify that bar is valid, the other 50% would say that I shouldn't do it, for example consider a case where the user verifies their BarHandle is correct, but a second (and unnecessary) check is also being done inside of Foo's constructor.

  Read the article

• F# Objects &ndash; Part 3 &ndash; it&rsquo;s time to overload&hellip;

  - by MarkPearl

  Okay, some basic examples of overloading in F# Overloading Constructors Assume you have a F# object called person… type Person (firstname : string, lastname : string) = member v.Fullname = firstname + " " + lastname   This only has one constructor. To add additional constructors to the object by explicitly declaring them using the method member new. type Person (firstname : string, lastname : string) = new () = Person("Unknown", "Unknown") member v.Fullname = firstname + " " + lastname   In the code above I added another constructor to the Person object that takes no parameters and then refers to the primary constructor. Using the same technique in the code below I have created another constructor that accepts only the firstname as a parameter to create an object. type Person (firstname : string, lastname : string) = new () = Person("Unknown", "Unknown") new (firstname : string) = Person(firstname, "Unknown") member v.Fullname = firstname + " " + lastname   Overloading Operators So, you can overload operators of objects in F# as well… let’s look at example code… type Person(name : string) = member v.name = name static member (+) (person1 : Person , person2 : Person) = Person(person1.name + " " + person2.name)   In the code above we have overloaded the “+” operator. Whenever we add to Person objects together, it will now create a new object with the combined names…

  Read the article

• How-to configure Spring Social via XML

  - by Matthias Steiner

  I spend a few hours trying to get Twitter integration to work with Spring Social using the XML configuration approach. All the examples I could find on the web (and on stackoverflow) always use the @Config approach as shown in the samples For whatever reason the bean definition to get an instance to the twitter API throws an AOP exception: Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Cannot create scoped proxy for bean 'scopedTarget.twitter': Target type could not be determined at the time of proxy creation. Here's the complete config file I have: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:jaxrs="http://cxf.apache.org/jaxrs" xmlns:context="http://www.springframework.org/schema/context" xmlns:util="http://www.springframework.org/schema/util" xmlns:cxf="http://cxf.apache.org/core" xmlns:aop="http://www.springframework.org/schema/aop" xmlns:jee="http://www.springframework.org/schema/jee" xmlns:mvc="http://www.springframework.org/schema/mvc" xmlns:jdbc="http://www.springframework.org/schema/jdbc" xsi:schemaLocation=" http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-3.1.xsd http://cxf.apache.org/jaxrs http://cxf.apache.org/schemas/jaxrs.xsd http://www.springframework.org/schema/context http://www.springframework.org/schema/context/spring-context.xsd http://www.springframework.org/schema/util http://www.springframework.org/schema/util/spring-util-3.1.xsd http://cxf.apache.org/core http://cxf.apache.org/schemas/core.xsd http://www.springframework.org/schema/aop http://www.springframework.org/schema/aop/spring-aop-3.1.xsd http://www.springframework.org/schema/jee http://www.springframework.org/schema/jee/spring-jee-3.1.xsd http://www.springframework.org/schema/mvc http://www.springframework.org/schema/mvc/spring-mvc-3.1.xsd http://www.springframework.org/schema/jdbc http://www.springframework.org/schema/jdbc/spring-jdbc-3.1.xsd"> <import resource="classpath:META-INF/cxf/cxf.xml" /> <import resource="classpath:META-INF/cxf/cxf-servlet.xml" /> <jee:jndi-lookup id="dataSource" jndi-name="java:comp/env/jdbc/DefaultDB" /> <!-- initialize DB required to store user auth tokens --> <jdbc:initialize-database data-source="dataSource" ignore-failures="ALL"> <jdbc:script location="classpath:/org/springframework/social/connect/jdbc/JdbcUsersConnectionRepository.sql"/> </jdbc:initialize-database> <bean id="connectionFactoryLocator" class="org.springframework.social.connect.support.ConnectionFactoryRegistry"> <property name="connectionFactories"> <list> <ref bean="twitterConnectFactory" /> </list> </property> </bean> <bean id="twitterConnectFactory" class="org.springframework.social.twitter.connect.TwitterConnectionFactory"> <constructor-arg value="xyz" /> <constructor-arg value="xzy" /> </bean> <bean id="usersConnectionRepository" class="org.springframework.social.connect.jdbc.JdbcUsersConnectionRepository"> <constructor-arg ref="dataSource" /> <constructor-arg ref="connectionFactoryLocator" /> <constructor-arg ref="textEncryptor" /> </bean> <bean id="connectionRepository" factory-method="createConnectionRepository" factory-bean="usersConnectionRepository" scope="request"> <constructor-arg value="#{request.userPrincipal.name}" /> <aop:scoped-proxy proxy-target-class="false" /> </bean> <bean id="twitter" factory-method="?ndPrimaryConnection" factory-bean="connectionRepository" scope="request" depends-on="connectionRepository"> <constructor-arg value="org.springframework.social.twitter.api.Twitter" /> <aop:scoped-proxy proxy-target-class="false" /> </bean> <bean id="textEncryptor" class="org.springframework.security.crypto.encrypt.Encryptors" factory-method="noOpText" /> <bean id="connectController" class="org.springframework.social.connect.web.ConnectController"> <constructor-arg ref="connectionFactoryLocator"/> <constructor-arg ref="connectionRepository"/> <property name="applicationUrl" value="https://socialscn.int.netweaver.ondemand.com/socialspringdemo" /> </bean> <bean id="signInAdapter" class="com.sap.netweaver.cloud.demo.social.SimpleSignInAdapter" /> </beans> What puzzles me is that the connectionRepositoryinstantiation works perfectly fine (I commented-out the twitter bean and tested the code!) ?!? It uses the same features: request scope and interface AOP proxy and works, but the twitter bean instantiation fails ?!? The spring social config code looks as follows (I can not see any differences, can you?): @Configuration public class SocialConfig { @Inject private Environment environment; @Inject private DataSource dataSource; @Bean @Scope(value="singleton", proxyMode=ScopedProxyMode.INTERFACES) public ConnectionFactoryLocator connectionFactoryLocator() { ConnectionFactoryRegistry registry = new ConnectionFactoryRegistry(); registry.addConnectionFactory(new TwitterConnectionFactory(environment.getProperty("twitter.consumerKey"), environment.getProperty("twitter.consumerSecret"))); return registry; } @Bean @Scope(value="singleton", proxyMode=ScopedProxyMode.INTERFACES) public UsersConnectionRepository usersConnectionRepository() { return new JdbcUsersConnectionRepository(dataSource, connectionFactoryLocator(), Encryptors.noOpText()); } @Bean @Scope(value="request", proxyMode=ScopedProxyMode.INTERFACES) public ConnectionRepository connectionRepository() { Authentication authentication = SecurityContextHolder.getContext().getAuthentication(); if (authentication == null) { throw new IllegalStateException("Unable to get a ConnectionRepository: no user signed in"); } return usersConnectionRepository().createConnectionRepository(authentication.getName()); } @Bean @Scope(value="request", proxyMode=ScopedProxyMode.INTERFACES) public Twitter twitter() { Connection<Twitter> twitter = connectionRepository().findPrimaryConnection(Twitter.class); return twitter != null ? twitter.getApi() : new TwitterTemplate(); } @Bean public ConnectController connectController() { ConnectController connectController = new ConnectController(connectionFactoryLocator(), connectionRepository()); connectController.addInterceptor(new PostToWallAfterConnectInterceptor()); connectController.addInterceptor(new TweetAfterConnectInterceptor()); return connectController; } @Bean public ProviderSignInController providerSignInController(RequestCache requestCache) { return new ProviderSignInController(connectionFactoryLocator(), usersConnectionRepository(), new SimpleSignInAdapter(requestCache)); } } Any help/pointers would be appreciated!!! Cheers, Matthias

  Read the article

• Using Unity – Part 5

  - by nmarun

  In the previous article of the series, I talked about constructor and property (setter) injection. I wanted to write about how to work with arrays and generics in Unity in this blog, after seeing how lengthy this one got, I’ve decided to write about generics in the next one. This one will only concentrate on arrays. My Product4 class has the following definition: 1: public interface IProduct 2: { 3: string WriteProductDetails(); 4: } 5:  6: public class Product4 : IProduct 7: { 8: public string Name { get; set; } 9: public ILogger[] Loggers { get; set; } 10:  11: public Product4(string productName, ILogger[] loggers) 12: { 13: Name = productName; 14: Loggers = loggers; 15: } 16:  17: public string WriteProductDetails() 18: { 19: StringBuilder productDetails = new StringBuilder(); 20: productDetails.AppendFormat("{0}<br/>", Name); 21: for (int i = 0; i < Loggers.Count(); i++) 22: { 23: productDetails.AppendFormat("{0}<br/>", Loggers[i].WriteLog()); 24: } 25: 26: return productDetails.ToString(); 27: } 28: } The key parts are line 4 where we declare an array of ILogger and line 5 where-in the constructor passes an instance of an array of ILogger objects. I’ve created another class – FakeLogger: 1: public class FakeLogger : ILogger 2: { 3: public string WriteLog() 4: { 5: return string.Format("Type: {0}", GetType()); 6: } 7: } It’s implementation is the same as what we had for the FileLogger class. Coming to the web.config file, first add the following aliases. The alias for FakeLogger should make sense right away. ILoggerArray defines an array of ILogger objects. I’ll tell why we need an alias for System.String data type. 1: <typeAlias alias="string" type="System.String, mscorlib" /> 2: <typeAlias alias="ILoggerArray" type="ProductModel.ILogger[], ProductModel" /> 3: <typeAlias alias="FakeLogger" type="ProductModel.FakeLogger, ProductModel"/> Next is to create mappings for the FileLogger and FakeLogger classes: 1: <type type="ILogger" mapTo="FileLogger" name="logger1"> 2: <lifetime type="singleton" /> 3: </type> 4: <type type="ILogger" mapTo="FakeLogger" name="logger2"> 5: <lifetime type="singleton" /> 6: </type> Finally, for the real deal: 1: <type type="IProduct" mapTo="Product4" name="ArrayProduct"> 2: <typeConfig extensionType="Microsoft.Practices.Unity.Configuration.TypeInjectionElement,Microsoft.Practices.Unity.Configuration, Version=1.2.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35"> 3: <constructor> 4: <param name="productName" parameterType="string" > 5: <value value="Product name from config file" type="string"/> 6: </param> 7: <param name="loggers" parameterType="ILoggerArray"> 8: <array> 9: <dependency name="logger2" /> 10: <dependency name="logger1" /> 11: </array> 12: </param> 13: </constructor> 14: </typeConfig> 15: </type> Here’s where I’m saying, that if a type of IProduct is requested to be resolved, map it to type Product4. Furthermore, the Product4 has two constructor parameters – a string and an array of type ILogger. You might have observed the first parameter of the constructor is named ‘productName’ and that matches the value in the name attribute of the param element. The parameterType of ‘string’ maps to ‘System.String, mscorlib’ and is defined in the type alias above. The set up is similar for the second constructor parameter. The name matches the name of the parameter (loggers) and is of type ILoggerArray, which maps to an array of ILogger objects. We’ve also decided to add two elements to this array when unity resolves it – an instance of FileLogger and one of FakeLogger. The click event of the button does the following: 1: //unityContainer.RegisterType<IProduct, Product4>(); 2: //IProduct product4 = unityContainer.Resolve<IProduct>(); 3: IProduct product4 = unityContainer.Resolve<IProduct>("ArrayConstructor"); 4: productDetailsLabel.Text = product4.WriteProductDetails(); It’s worth mentioning here about the change in the format of resolving the IProduct to create an instance of Product4. You cannot use the regular way (the commented lines) to get an instance of Product4. The reason is due to the behavior of Unity which Alex Ermakov has brilliantly explained here. The corresponding output of the action is: You have a couple of options when it comes to adding dependency elements in the array node. You can: - leave it empty (no dependency elements declared): This will only create an empty array of loggers. This way you can check for non-null condition, in your mock classes. - add multiple dependency elements with the same name 1: <param name="loggers" parameterType="ILoggerArray"> 2: <array> 3: <dependency name="logger2" /> 4: <dependency name="logger2" /> 5: </array> 6: </param> With this you’ll see two instances of FakeLogger in the output. This article shows how Unity allows you to instantiate objects with arrays. Find the code here.

  Read the article

• ASP.NET exception gives irrelevant stack trace on YSOD, very challenging!

  - by pootow

  Here is the YSOD: Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to completion of the operation or the server is not responding. Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code. Exception Details: System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to completion of the operation or the server is not responding. Source Error: An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of the current web request. Information regarding the origin and location of the exception can be identified using the exception stack trace below. Stack Trace: [SqlException (0x80131904): Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to completion of the operation or the server is not responding.] System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionPool.GetConnection(DbConnection owningObject) +428 System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionFactory.GetConnection(DbConnection owningConnection) +65 System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionClosed.OpenConnection(DbConnection outerConnection, DbConnectionFactory connectionFactory) +117 System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.Open() +122 ECommerce.PMethod.Sql.SqlConns.Open() +78 ECommerce.PMethod.Sql.SqlConns..ctor() +120 ECommerce.login.DatasInfo.Proc.UserCenter.IsLogin(String UserGUID, Int32 UserID) +49 ECommerce.login.Rules.Users.UserLogin.isLogin() +44 Config.isUserLogined() +5 Shopping_Shopping.Page_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e) +10 System.Web.Util.CalliHelper.EventArgFunctionCaller(IntPtr fp, Object o, Object t, EventArgs e) +14 System.Web.Util.CalliEventHandlerDelegateProxy.Callback(Object sender, EventArgs e) +35 System.Web.UI.Control.OnLoad(EventArgs e) +99 System.Web.UI.Control.LoadRecursive() +50 System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint) +627 [TypeInitializationException: The type initializer for 'ECommerce.ERP.DAL.DBConn' threw an exception.] ECommerce.ERP.DAL.DBConn.get_ConnString() +0 [ObjectDefinitionStoreException: Factory method 'System.String get_ConnString()' threw an Exception.] Spring.Objects.Factory.Support.SimpleInstantiationStrategy.Instantiate(RootObjectDefinition definition, String name, IObjectFactory factory, MethodInfo factoryMethod, Object[] arguments) +257 Spring.Objects.Factory.Support.ConstructorResolver.InstantiateUsingFactoryMethod(String name, RootObjectDefinition definition, Object[] arguments) +624 Spring.Objects.Factory.Support.AbstractAutowireCapableObjectFactory.InstantiateUsingFactoryMethod(String name, RootObjectDefinition definition, Object[] arguments) +60 Spring.Objects.Factory.Support.AbstractAutowireCapableObjectFactory.CreateObjectInstance(String objectName, RootObjectDefinition objectDefinition, Object[] arguments) +56 Spring.Objects.Factory.Support.AbstractAutowireCapableObjectFactory.InstantiateObject(String name, RootObjectDefinition definition, Object[] arguments, Boolean allowEagerCaching, Boolean suppressConfigure) +436 [ObjectCreationException: Error thrown by a dependency of object 'styleService' defined in 'assembly [ECommerce.Services.Impl, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null], resource [ECommerce.Services.Impl.AppContext.xml] line 56' : Initialization of object failed : Factory method 'System.String get_ConnString()' threw an Exception. while resolving 'constructor argument with name promotionservice' to 'promotionService' defined in 'assembly [ECommerce.Services.Impl, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null], resource [ECommerce.Services.Impl.AppContext.xml] line 31' while resolving 'constructor argument with name domainservice' to 'promotionDomainService' defined in 'assembly [ECommerce.Domain, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null], resource [ECommerce.Domain.AppContext.xml] line 20' while resolving 'constructor argument with name promotionrepos' to 'promotionRepos' defined in 'assembly [ECommerce.Data.AdoNet, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null], resource [ECommerce.Data.AdoNet.AppContext.xml] line 34' while resolving 'constructor argument with name connstr' to 'ECommerce.ERP.DAL.DBConn#389F399' defined in 'assembly [ECommerce.Data.AdoNet, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null], resource [ECommerce.Data.AdoNet.AppContext.xml] line 34'] Spring.Objects.Factory.Support.ObjectDefinitionValueResolver.ResolveReference(IObjectDefinition definition, String name, String argumentName, RuntimeObjectReference reference) +394 Spring.Objects.Factory.Support.ObjectDefinitionValueResolver.ResolvePropertyValue(String name, IObjectDefinition definition, String argumentName, Object argumentValue) +312 Spring.Objects.Factory.Support.ObjectDefinitionValueResolver.ResolveValueIfNecessary(String name, IObjectDefinition definition, String argumentName, Object argumentValue) +17 Spring.Objects.Factory.Support.ConstructorResolver.ResolveConstructorArguments(String objectName, RootObjectDefinition definition, ObjectWrapper wrapper, ConstructorArgumentValues cargs, ConstructorArgumentValues resolvedValues) +993 Spring.Objects.Factory.Support.ConstructorResolver.AutowireConstructor(String objectName, RootObjectDefinition rod, ConstructorInfo[] chosenCtors, Object[] explicitArgs) +171 Spring.Objects.Factory.Support.AbstractAutowireCapableObjectFactory.AutowireConstructor(String name, RootObjectDefinition definition, ConstructorInfo[] ctors, Object[] explicitArgs) +65 Spring.Objects.Factory.Support.AbstractAutowireCapableObjectFactory.CreateObjectInstance(String objectName, RootObjectDefinition objectDefinition, Object[] arguments) +161 Spring.Objects.Factory.Support.AbstractAutowireCapableObjectFactory.InstantiateObject(String name, RootObjectDefinition definition, Object[] arguments, Boolean allowEagerCaching, Boolean suppressConfigure) +636 Spring.Objects.Factory.Support.AbstractObjectFactory.CreateAndCacheSingletonInstance(String objectName, RootObjectDefinition objectDefinition, Object[] arguments) +174 Spring.Objects.Factory.Support.WebObjectFactory.CreateAndCacheSingletonInstance(String objectName, RootObjectDefinition objectDefinition, Object[] arguments) +150 Spring.Objects.Factory.Support.AbstractObjectFactory.GetObjectInternal(String name, Type requiredType, Object[] arguments, Boolean suppressConfigure) +990 Spring.Objects.Factory.Support.AbstractObjectFactory.GetObject(String name) +10 Spring.Context.Support.AbstractApplicationContext.GetObject(String name) +20 ECommerce.Common.ServiceLocator.GetService() +334 ECommerce.Mvc.Controllers.StylesController..ctor() +72 [TargetInvocationException: Exception has been thrown by the target of an invocation.] System.RuntimeTypeHandle.CreateInstance(RuntimeType type, Boolean publicOnly, Boolean noCheck, Boolean& canBeCached, RuntimeMethodHandle& ctor, Boolean& bNeedSecurityCheck) +0 System.RuntimeType.CreateInstanceSlow(Boolean publicOnly, Boolean fillCache) +86 System.RuntimeType.CreateInstanceImpl(Boolean publicOnly, Boolean skipVisibilityChecks, Boolean fillCache) +230 System.Activator.CreateInstance(Type type, Boolean nonPublic) +67 System.Web.Mvc.DefaultControllerFactory.GetControllerInstance(RequestContext requestContext, Type controllerType) +80 [InvalidOperationException: An error occurred when trying to create a controller of type 'ECommerce.Mvc.Controllers.StylesController'. Make sure that the controller has a parameterless public constructor.] System.Web.Mvc.DefaultControllerFactory.GetControllerInstance(RequestContext requestContext, Type controllerType) +190 System.Web.Mvc.DefaultControllerFactory.CreateController(RequestContext requestContext, String controllerName) +68 System.Web.Mvc.MvcHandler.ProcessRequestInit(HttpContextBase httpContext, IController& controller, IControllerFactory& factory) +118 System.Web.Mvc.MvcHandler.BeginProcessRequest(HttpContextBase httpContext, AsyncCallback callback, Object state) +46 System.Web.Mvc.MvcHandler.BeginProcessRequest(HttpContext httpContext, AsyncCallback callback, Object state) +63 System.Web.Mvc.MvcHandler.System.Web.IHttpAsyncHandler.BeginProcessRequest(HttpContext context, AsyncCallback cb, Object extraData) +13 System.Web.CallHandlerExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep.Execute() +8677954 System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(IExecutionStep step, Boolean& completedSynchronously) +155 Version Information: Microsoft .NET Framework Version:2.0.50727.3082; ASP.NET Version:2.0.50727.3082 Question is: the first stack trace is irrelevant to others, what happened? Any ideas? Let me make this more clear: a MVC page uses the spring part trying to load a lazy-init service which constructor wants a connection string through a static property like this: <object id="promotionRepos" type="ECommerce.Data.AdoNet.Promotions.PromotionRepos, ECommerce.Data.AdoNet" lazy-init="true"> <constructor-arg name="provider"> <null /> </constructor-arg> <constructor-arg name="connStr"> <object type="ECommerce.ERP.DAL.DBConn, ECommerce.ERP.DAL" factory-method="get_ConnString" /> </constructor-arg> <property name="RefreshInterval" value="00:00:10" /> </object> the timeout part is some what irrelevent to all others. see this in the first exception: Shopping_Shopping.Page_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e) +10 it's another page at all. And also, ECommerce.PMethod.Sql.SqlConns.Open() uses its own connection string, not the one loaded by spring, it's different module from diffrent team. And I am sure the connection string is correct. And, this ysod cames up randomly. Sometimes nothing is wrong, and sometimes, it appears. I thought there could be something wrong with my database or the network/firewall, I will check it later, but now I want understand this tricky stack trace.

  Read the article

• Yet Yet Another Way To Create An Object

  - by Ricardo Peres

  Yep, there's still another one: FormatterServices. This one allows one to create an object without running it's constructor... it is used by some of our good friends serializers. Stopwatch watch = new Stopwatch(); for (Int32 i = 0; i Beware, though: because the constructor isn't run (and remember that all fields that are initialized inline are also in fact initialized in the constructor), the object's state may be invalid. Enough object construction for now... SyntaxHighlighter.config.clipboardSwf = 'http://alexgorbatchev.com/pub/sh/2.0.320/scripts/clipboard.swf'; SyntaxHighlighter.brushes.CSharp.aliases = ['c#', 'c-sharp', 'csharp']; SyntaxHighlighter.all();

  Read the article

• Please help me to improve Re-Sharper

  - by TATWORTH

  Re-Sharper is an excellent aid to producing good code in either C# or VB.NET. Recently through using Resharper and StyleCop, I have found three area where ReSharper needs to be improved. Please log into the YouTrack at http://youtrack.jetbrains.net and vote for the following: RSRP-268868 Improvement to removal of redundant else and invert if optimisations for enhanced stylecop compliance. When Resharper removes a redundant else, there needs to be a blank line added. Currently there is no provision to specify this. Please vote for this! RSRP-272286 Resharper Feature Request to move initialisation to static constructor Currently ReSharper offers moving initialisation of of non-static variable to a constructor. Why not offer the same for a static constructor?  Please vote for this! RSRP-272285 Expansion of Switch Statement by Resharper Currently ReSharper will fill an empty switch statement based upon an enumeration but will not add missing enumeration values to such a switch statement.   Can't code withoutCoding assistance, smart code editing and code completion for C# and VB.NET

  Read the article

• Creating Entity Framework objects with Unity for Unit of Work/Repository pattern

  - by TobyEvans

  Hi there, I'm trying to implement the Unit of Work/Repository pattern, as described here: http://blogs.msdn.com/adonet/archive/2009/06/16/using-repository-and-unit-of-work-patterns-with-entity-framework-4-0.aspx This requires each Repository to accept an IUnitOfWork implementation, eg an EF datacontext extended with a partial class to add an IUnitOfWork interface. I'm actually using .net 3.5, not 4.0. My basic Data Access constructor looks like this: public DataAccessLayer(IUnitOfWork unitOfWork, IRealtimeRepository realTimeRepository) { this.unitOfWork = unitOfWork; this.realTimeRepository = realTimeRepository; } So far, so good. What I'm trying to do is add Dependency Injection using the Unity Framework. Getting the EF data context to be created with Unity was an adventure, as it had trouble resolving the constructor - what I did in the end was to create another constructor in my partial class with a new overloaded constructor, and marked that with [InjectionConstructor] [InjectionConstructor] public communergyEntities(string connectionString, string containerName) :this() { (I know I need to pass the connection string to the base object, that can wait until once I've got all the objects initialising correctly) So, using this technique, I can happily resolve my entity framework object as an IUnitOfWork instance thus: using (IUnityContainer container = new UnityContainer()) { container.RegisterType<IUnitOfWork, communergyEntities>(); container.Configure<InjectedMembers>() .ConfigureInjectionFor<communergyEntities>( new InjectionConstructor("a", "b")) DataAccessLayer target = container.Resolve<DataAccessLayer>(); Great. What I need to do now is create the reference to the repository object for the DataAccessLayer - the DAL only needs to know the interface, so I'm guessing that I need to instantiate it as part of the Unity Resolve statement, passing it the appropriate IUnitOfWork interface. In the past, I would have just passed the Repository constructor the db connection string, and it would have gone away, created a local Entity Framework object and used that just for the lifetime of the Repository method. This is different, in that I create an Entity Framework instance as an IUnitOfWork implementation during the Unity Resolve statement, and it's that instance I need to pass into the constructor of the Repository - is that possible, and if so, how? I'm wondering if I could make the Repository a property and mark it as a Dependency, but that still wouldn't solve the problem of how to create the Repository with the IUnitOfWork object that the DAL is being Resolved with I'm not sure if I've understood this pattern correctly, and will happily take advice on the best way to implement it - Entity Framework is staying, but Unity can be swapped out if not the best approach. If I've got the whole thing upside down, please tell me thanks

  Read the article

• How to send keypresses from qt application to libvlc

  - by anon

  I need to send keypresses from my application window to libvlc, how do i do that? I tried using varSetInteger but then i got the following error error: ‘var_SetInteger’ was not declared in this scope so i searched for the file in which var_SetInteger was defined and found that it was defined in vlc_variables.h so in included it and got the following error. What am i missing? ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:121: error: ‘__var_Create’ has not been declared ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:121: error: expected identifier before ‘(’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:121: error: expected )' before ‘*’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:121: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘...’ before ‘*’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:121: error: expected constructor, destructor, or type conversion before ‘)’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:122: error: ‘__var_Destroy’ has not been declared ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:122: error: expected identifier before ‘(’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:122: error: expected )' before ‘*’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:122: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘...’ before ‘*’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:122: error: expected constructor, destructor, or type conversion before ‘)’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:124: error: ‘__var_Change’ has not been declared ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:124: error: expected identifier before ‘(’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:124: error: expected )' before ‘*’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:124: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘...’ before ‘*’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:124: error: expected constructor, destructor, or type conversion before ‘)’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:126: error: ‘__var_Type’ has not been declared ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:126: error: expected identifier before ‘(’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:126: error: expected )' before ‘*’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:126: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘...’ before ‘*’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:126: error: expected constructor, destructor, or type conversion before ‘)’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:127: error: ‘__var_Set’ has not been declared ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:127: error: expected identifier before ‘(’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:127: error: expected )' before ‘*’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:127: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘...’ before ‘*’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:127: error: expected constructor, destructor, or type conversion before ‘)’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:128: error: ‘__var_Get’ has not been declared ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:128: error: expected identifier before ‘(’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:128: error: expected )' before ‘*’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:128: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘...’ before ‘*’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:128: error: expected constructor, destructor, or type conversion before ‘)’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:131: error: ‘__var_Command’ has not been declared ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:131: error: expected identifier before ‘(’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:131: error: expected )' before ‘*’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:131: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘...’ before ‘*’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:131: error: expected constructor, destructor, or type conversion before ‘)’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:133: error: expected constructor, destructor, or type conversion before ‘(’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:171: error: ‘__var_AddCallback’ has not been declared ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:171: error: expected identifier before ‘(’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:171: error: expected )' before ‘*’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:171: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘...’ before ‘*’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:171: error: expected constructor, destructor, or type conversion before ‘)’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:172: error: ‘__var_DelCallback’ has not been declared ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:172: error: expected identifier before ‘(’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:172: error: expected )' before ‘*’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:172: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘...’ before ‘*’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:172: error: expected constructor, destructor, or type conversion before ‘)’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:173: error: ‘__var_TriggerCallback’ has not been declared ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:173: error: expected identifier before ‘(’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:173: error: expected )' before ‘*’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:173: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘...’ before ‘*’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:173: error: expected constructor, destructor, or type conversion before ‘)’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:201: error: ‘__var_SetInteger’ declared as an ‘inline’ variable ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:201: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:201: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:201: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:201: error: expected primary-expression before ‘int’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:201: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:202: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘{’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:215: error: ‘__var_SetBool’ declared as an ‘inline’ variable ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:215: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:215: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:215: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:215: error: expected primary-expression before ‘bool’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:215: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:216: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘{’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:229: error: ‘__var_SetTime’ declared as an ‘inline’ variable ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:229: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:229: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:229: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:229: error: expected primary-expression before ‘i’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:229: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:230: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘{’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:243: error: ‘__var_SetFloat’ declared as an ‘inline’ variable ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:243: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:243: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:243: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:243: error: expected primary-expression before ‘float’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:243: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:244: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘{’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:257: error: ‘__var_SetString’ declared as an ‘inline’ variable ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:257: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:257: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:257: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:257: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:257: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:258: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘{’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:270: error: ‘__var_SetVoid’ declared as an ‘inline’ variable ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:270: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:270: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:270: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:270: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:271: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘{’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:302: error: ‘__var_GetInteger’ declared as an ‘inline’ variable ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:302: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:302: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:302: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:302: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:303: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘{’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:317: error: ‘__var_GetBool’ declared as an ‘inline’ variable ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:317: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:317: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:317: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:317: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:318: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘{’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:332: error: ‘__var_GetTime’ declared as an ‘inline’ variable ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:332: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:332: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:332: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:332: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:333: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘{’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:347: error: ‘__var_GetFloat’ declared as an ‘inline’ variable ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:347: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:347: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:347: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:347: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:348: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘{’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:362: error: ‘__var_GetString’ declared as an ‘inline’ variable ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:362: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:362: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:362: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:362: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:363: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘{’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:371: error: ‘__var_GetNonEmptyString’ declared as an ‘inline’ variable ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:371: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:371: error: ‘obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:371: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:371: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:372: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘{’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:412: error: variable or field ‘__var_IncInteger’ declared void ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:412: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:412: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:412: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:424: error: variable or field ‘__var_DecInteger’ declared void ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:424: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:424: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:424: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:437: error: ‘__var_CreateGetInteger’ declared as an ‘inline’ variable ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:437: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:437: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:437: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:437: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:438: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘{’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:449: error: ‘__var_CreateGetBool’ declared as an ‘inline’ variable ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:449: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:449: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:449: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:449: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:450: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘{’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:461: error: ‘__var_CreateGetTime’ declared as an ‘inline’ variable ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:461: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:461: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:461: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:461: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:462: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘{’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:473: error: ‘__var_CreateGetFloat’ declared as an ‘inline’ variable ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:473: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:473: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:473: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:473: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:474: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘{’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:485: error: ‘__var_CreateGetString’ declared as an ‘inline’ variable ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:485: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:485: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:486: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:486: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:487: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘{’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:492: error: ‘__var_CreateGetNonEmptyString’ declared as an ‘inline’ variable ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:492: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:492: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:493: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:493: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:494: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘{’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:527: error: ‘__var_CreateGetIntegerCommand’ declared as an ‘inline’ variable ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:527: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:527: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:527: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:527: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:528: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘{’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:540: error: ‘__var_CreateGetBoolCommand’ declared as an ‘inline’ variable ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:540: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:540: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:540: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:540: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:541: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘{’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:553: error: ‘__var_CreateGetTimeCommand’ declared as an ‘inline’ variable ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:553: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:553: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:553: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:553: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:554: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘{’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:566: error: ‘__var_CreateGetFloatCommand’ declared as an ‘inline’ variable ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:566: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:566: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:566: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:566: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:567: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘{’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:579: error: ‘__var_CreateGetStringCommand’ declared as an ‘inline’ variable ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:579: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:579: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:580: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:580: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:581: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘{’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:587: error: ‘__var_CreateGetNonEmptyStringCommand’ declared as an ‘inline’ variable ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:587: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:587: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:588: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:588: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:589: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘{’ token src/transcribeWidget.cpp:859: warning: unused parameter ‘bytesSent’ src/transcribeWidget.cpp:859: warning: unused parameter ‘bytesTotal’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:201: warning: ‘__var_SetInteger’ defined but not used ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:215: warning: ‘__var_SetBool’ defined but not used ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:229: warning: ‘__var_SetTime’ defined but not used ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:243: warning: ‘__var_SetFloat’ defined but not used ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:257: warning: ‘__var_SetString’ defined but not used ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:270: warning: ‘__var_SetVoid’ defined but not used ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:302: warning: ‘__var_GetInteger’ defined but not used ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:317: warning: ‘__var_GetBool’ defined but not used ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:332: warning: ‘__var_GetTime’ defined but not used ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:347: warning: ‘__var_GetFloat’ defined but not used ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:362: warning: ‘__var_GetString’ defined but not used ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:371: warning: ‘__var_GetNonEmptyString’ defined but not used ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:437: warning: ‘__var_CreateGetInteger’ defined but not used ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:449: warning: ‘__var_CreateGetBool’ defined but not used ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:461: warning: ‘__var_CreateGetTime’ defined but not used ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:473: warning: ‘__var_CreateGetFloat’ defined but not used ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:485: warning: ‘__var_CreateGetString’ defined but not used ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:492: warning: ‘__var_CreateGetNonEmptyString’ defined but not used ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:527: warning: ‘__var_CreateGetIntegerCommand’ defined but not used ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:540: warning: ‘__var_CreateGetBoolCommand’ defined but not used ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:553: warning: ‘__var_CreateGetTimeCommand’ defined but not used ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:566: warning: ‘__var_CreateGetFloatCommand’ defined but not used ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:579: warning: ‘__var_CreateGetStringCommand’ defined but not used ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:587: warning: ‘__var_CreateGetNonEmptyStringCommand’ defined but not used

  Read the article

• Rhino Mocks, Dependency Injection, and Separation of Concerns

  - by whatispunk

  I am new to mocking and dependency injection and need some guidance. My application is using a typical N-Tier architecture where the BLL references the DAL, and the UI references the BLL but not the DAL. Pretty straight forward. Lets say, for example, I have the following classes: class MyDataAccess : IMyDataAccess {} class MyBusinessLogic {} Each exists in a separate assembly. I want to mock MyDataAccess in the tests for MyBusinessLogic. So I added a constructor to the MyBusinessLogic class to take an IMyDataAccess parameter for the dependency injection. But now when I try to create an instance of MyBusinessLogic on the UI layer it requires a reference to the DAL. I thought I could define a default constructor on MyBusinessLogic to set a default IMyDataAccess implementation, but not only does this seem like a codesmell it didn't actually solve the problem. I'd still have a public constructor with IMyDataAccess in the signature. So the UI layer still requires a reference to the DAL in order to compile. One possible solution I am toying with is to create an internal constructor for MyBusinessLogic with the IMyDataAccess parameter. Then I can use an Accessor from the test project to call the constructor. But there's still that smell. What is the common solution here. I must just be doing something wrong. How could I improve the architecture?

  Read the article

• DynamicMethod for ConstructorInfo.Invoke, what do I need to consider?

  - by Lasse V. Karlsen

  My question is this: If I'm going to build a DynamicMethod object, corresponding to a ConstructorInfo.Invoke call, what types of IL do I need to implement in order to cope with all (or most) types of arguments, when I can guarantee that the right type and number of arguments is going to be passed in before I make the call? Background I am on my 3rd iteration of my IoC container, and currently doing some profiling to figure out if there are any areas where I can easily shave off large amounts of time being used. One thing I noticed is that when resolving to a concrete type, ultimately I end up with a constructor being called, using ConstructorInfo.Invoke, passing in an array of arguments that I've worked out. What I noticed is that the invoke method has quite a bit of overhead, and I'm wondering if most of this is just different implementations of the same checks I do. For instance, due to the constructor matching code I have, to find a matching constructor for the predefined parameter names, types, and values that I have passed in, there's no way this particular invoke call will not end up with something it should be able to cope with, like the correct number of arguments, in the right order, of the right type, and with appropriate values. When doing a profiling session containing a million calls to my resolve method, and then replacing it with a DynamicMethod implementation that mimics the Invoke call, the profiling timings was like this: ConstructorInfo.Invoke: 1973ms DynamicMethod: 93ms This accounts for around 20% of the total runtime of this profiling application. In other words, by replacing the ConstructorInfo.Invoke call with a DynamicMethod that does the same, I am able to shave off 20% runtime when dealing with basic factory-scoped services (ie. all resolution calls end up with a constructor call). I think this is fairly substantial, and warrants a closer look at how much work it would be to build a stable DynamicMethod generator for constructors in this context. So, the dynamic method would take in an object array, and return the constructed object, and I already know the ConstructorInfo object in question. Therefore, it looks like the dynamic method would be made up of the following IL: l001: ldarg.0 ; the object array containing the arguments l002: ldc.i4.0 ; the index of the first argument l003: ldelem.ref ; get the value of the first argument l004: castclass T ; cast to the right type of argument (only if not "Object") (repeat l001-l004 for all parameters, l004 only for non-Object types, varying l002 constant from 0 and up for each index) l005: newobj ci ; call the constructor l006: ret Is there anything else I need to consider? Note that I'm aware that creating dynamic methods will probably not be available when running the application in "reduced access mode" (sometimes the brain just won't give up those terms), but in that case I can easily detect that and just calling the original constructor as before, with the overhead and all.

  Read the article

• Delegates in .NET: how are they constructed ?

  - by Saulius

  While inspecting delegates in C# and .NET in general, I noticed some interesting facts: Creating a delegate in C# creates a class derived from MulticastDelegate with a constructor: .method public hidebysig specialname rtspecialname instance void .ctor(object 'object', native int 'method') runtime managed { } Meaning that it expects the instance and a pointer to the method. Yet the syntax of constructing a delegate in C# suggests that it has a constructor new MyDelegate(int () target) where I can recognise int () as a function instance (int *target() would be a function pointer in C++). So obviously the C# compiler picks out the correct method from the method group defined by the function name and constructs the delegate. So the first question would be, where does the C# compiler (or Visual Studio, to be precise) pick this constructor signature from ? I did not notice any special attributes or something that would make a distinction. Is this some sort of compiler/visualstudio magic ? If not, is the T (args) target construction valid in C# ? I did not manage to get anything with it to compile, e.g.: int () target = MyMethod; is invalid, so is doing anything with MyMetod, e.g. calling .ToString() on it (well this does make some sense, since that is technically a method group, but I imagine it should be possible to explicitly pick out a method by casting, e.g. (int())MyFunction. So is all of this purely compiler magic ? Looking at the construction through reflector reveals yet another syntax: Func CS$1$0000 = new Func(null, (IntPtr) Foo); This is consistent with the disassembled constructor signature, yet this does not compile! One final interesting note is that the classes Delegate and MulticastDelegate have yet another sets of constructors: .method family hidebysig specialname rtspecialname instance void .ctor(class System.Type target, string 'method') cil managed Where does the transition from an instance and method pointer to a type and a string method name occur ? Can this be explained by the runtime managed keywords in the custom delegate constructor signature, i.e. does the runtime do it's job here ?

  Read the article

• ASP.Net Webservice - Constructors with Parameters

  - by Ben

  Hi, I'm fairly new to WebService developement and have just set up my own webservice (ASP.Net 3.5, Visual Studio 2008 .asmx file). I can not find a way of setting up my webservice to take parameters on the constructor. If i create a constructor that takes parameters, it is not then shown when i hook up to the webservice from my application (it only shows a parameterless constructor). Am i missing something blatently obvious, or is this not possible (and why not)? Thanks.

  Read the article

• constructors and inheritance in JS

  - by nandinga

  Hi all, This is about "inheritance" in JavaScript. Supose I create a constructor Bird(), and another called Parrot() which I make to "inherit" the props of Bird by asigning an instance of it to Parrot's prototype, like the following code shows: function Bird() { this.fly = function(){}; } function Parrot() { this.talk = function(){ alert("praa!!"); }; } Parrot.prototype = new Bird(); var p = new Parrot(); p.talk(); // Alerts "praa!!" alert(p.constructor); // Alerts the Bird function!?!?! After I've created an instance of Parrot, how comes that the .constructor property of it is Bird(), and not Parrot(), which is the constructor I've used to create the object? Thanks!!

  Read the article

• Bug in the official Android Fragments training sample?

  - by Jeff Axelrod

  It seems to me that there must be a bug in the Android Fragments demo. As background, Fragments are apparently sometimes instantiated by the Android OS and thus need a public no-arg constructor: All subclasses of Fragment must include a public empty constructor. The framework will often re-instantiate a fragment class when needed, in particular during state restore, and needs to be able to find this constructor to instantiate it. If the empty constructor is not available, a runtime exception will occur in some cases during state restore. But the NewsReader demo from the official Android training on Fragments constructs the HeadlinesFragment class and configures it with setOnHeadlineSelectedListener(this) from NewsReaderActivity.onCreate(). If the Android OS re-instantiates this fragment, the mHeadlineSelectedListener field will be null because HeadlinesFragment doesn't save or restore its state. Is this a bug or am I missing something?

  Read the article

• C# reflection instantiation

  - by NickLarsen

  I am currently trying to create a generic instance factory for which takes an interface as the generic parameter (enforced in the constructor) and then lets you get instantiated objects which implement that interface from all types in all loaded assemblies. The current implementation is as follows:     public class InstantiationFactory     {         protected Type Type { get; set; }         public InstantiationFactory()         {             this.Type = typeof(T);             if (!this.Type.IsInterface)             {                 // is there a more descriptive exception to throw?                 throw new ArgumentException(/* Crafty message */);             }         }         public IEnumerable GetLoadedTypes()         {             // this line of code found in other stack overflow questions             var types = AppDomain.CurrentDomain.GetAssemblies()                 .SelectMany(a = a.GetTypes())                 .Where(/* lambda to identify instantiable types which implement this interface */);             return types;         }         public IEnumerable GetImplementations(IEnumerable types)         {             var implementations = types.Where(/* lambda to identify instantiable types which implement this interface */                 .Select(x = CreateInstance(x));             return implementations;         }         public IEnumerable GetLoadedImplementations()         {             var loadedTypes = GetLoadedTypes();             var implementations = GetImplementations(loadedTypes);             return implementations;         }         private T CreateInstance(Type type)         {             T instance = default(T);             var constructor = type.GetConstructor(Type.EmptyTypes);             if (/* valid to instantiate test */)             {                 object constructed = constructor.Invoke(null);                 instance = (T)constructed;             }             return instance;         }     } It seems useful to me to have my CreateInstance(Type) function implemented as an extension method so I can reuse it later and simplify the code of my factory, but I can't figure out how to return a strongly typed value from that extension method. I realize I could just return an object:     public static class TypeExtensions     {         public object CreateInstance(this Type type)         {             var constructor = type.GetConstructor(Type.EmptyTypes);             return /* valid to instantiate test */ ? constructor.Invoke(null) : null;         }     } Is it possible to have an extension method create a signature per instance of the type it extends? My perfect code would be this, which avoids having to cast the result of the call to CreateInstance():     Type type = typeof(MyParameterlessConstructorImplementingType);     MyParameterlessConstructorImplementingType usable = type.CreateInstance();

  Read the article

• Trouble with object injection in Spring.Net

  - by Abdel Olakara

  Hi all, I have a issue with my Spring.Net configuration where its not injecting an object. I have a CommService to which an object named GeneralEmail is injected to. Here is the configuration: <!-- GeneralMail Object --> <object id="GeneralMailObject" type="CommUtil.Email.GeneralEmail, CommUtil"> <constructor-arg name="host" value="xxxxx.com"/> <constructor-arg name="port" value="25"/> <constructor-arg name="user" value="[email protected]"/> <constructor-arg name="password" value="xxxxx"/> <constructor-arg name="template" value="xxxxx"/> </object> <!-- Communication Service --> <object id="CommServiceObject" type="TApp.Code.Services.CommService, TApp"> <property name="emailService" ref="GeneralMailObject" /> </object> The communication service object is again injected to many other aspx pages & service. In one scenario, I need to call the commnucation service from an static WebMethod. I try doing: CommService cso = new CommService(); But when i try to get the emailService object, its null! why didn't the spring inject the GeneralMail object into my cso object? What am I doing wrong and how do I access the object from spring container. Thanks in advance for the suggestions and solutions. Reagrds, Abdel Olakara

  Read the article

• Refactor throwing not null exception if using a method that has a dependency on a certain contructor

  - by N00b

  In the method below the second constructor accepts a ForumThread object which the IncrementViewCount() method uses. There is a dependency between the method and that particular constructor. Without extracting into a new private method the null check in IncrementViewCount() and LockForumThread() (plus other methods not shown) is there some simpler re-factoring I can do or the implementation of a better design practice for this method to guard against the use of the wrong constructor with these dependent methods? Thank you for any suggestions in advance. private readonly IThread _forumLogic; private readonly ForumThread _ft; public ThreadLogic(IThread forumLogic) : this(forumLogic, null) { } public ThreadLogic(IThread forumLogic, ForumThread ft) { _forumLogic = forumLogic; _ft = ft; } public void Create(ForumThread ft) { _forumLogic.SaveThread(ft); } public void IncrementViewCount() { if (_ft == null) throw new NoNullAllowedException("_ft ForumThread is null; this must be set in the constructor"); lock (_ft) { _ft.ViewCount = _ft.ViewCount + 1; _forumLogic.SaveThread(_ft); } } public void LockForumThread() { if (_ft == null) throw new NoNullAllowedException("_ft ForumThread is null; this must be set in the constructor"); _ft.ThreadLocked = true; _forumLogic.SaveThread(_ft); }

  Read the article

• When do instance variables get initialized and values assigned?

  - by AKh

  When doees the instance variable get initialized? Is it after the constructor block is done or before it? Consider this example: public abstract class Parent { public Parent(){ System.out.println("Parent Constructor"); init(); } public void init(){ System.out.println("parent Init()"); } } public class Child extends Parent { private Integer attribute1; private Integer attribute2 = null; public Child(){ super(); System.out.println("Child Constructor"); } public void init(){ System.out.println("Child init()"); super.init(); attribute1 = new Integer(100); attribute2 = new Integer(200); } public void print(){ System.out.println("attribute 1 : " +attribute1); System.out.println("attribute 2 : " +attribute2); } } public class Tester { public static void main(String[] args) { Parent c = new Child(); ((Child)c).print(); } } OUTPUT: Parent Constructor Child init() parent Init() Child Constructor attribute 1 : 100 attribute 2 : null When the memory for the atribute 1 & 2 are allocated in the heap ? Curious to know why is attribute 2 is NULL ? Are there any design flaws?

  Read the article

• Permission denied to access property 'toString'

  - by Anders

  I'm trying to find a generic way of getting the name of Constructors. My goal is to create a Convention over configuration framework for KnockoutJS My idea is to iterate over all objects in the window and when I find the contructor i'm looking for then I can use the index to get the name of the contructor The code sofar (function() { constructors = {}; window.findConstructorName = function(instance) { var constructor = instance.constructor; var name = constructors[constructor]; if(name !== undefined) { return name; } var traversed = []; var nestedFind = function(root) { if(typeof root == "function" || traversed[root]) { return } traversed[root] = true; for(var index in root) { if(root[index] == constructor) { return index; } var found = nestedFind(root[index]); if(found !== undefined) { return found; } } } name = nestedFind(window); constructors[constructor] = name; return name; } })(); var MyApp = {}; MyApp.Foo = function() { }; var instance = new MyApp.Foo(); console.log(findConstructorName(instance)); The problem is that I get a Permission denied to access property 'toString' Exception, and i cant even try catch so see which object is causing the problem Fiddle http://jsfiddle.net/4ZwaV/

  Read the article

• Send a variable on the heap to another thread

  - by user1201889

  I have a strange problem in C++. An address of a Boolean gets "destroyed" but it doesn't get touched. I know that there are beater way's to accomplish what I try to do, but I want to know what I do wrong. I have a main class; this main class contains a vector of another class. There is a strange problem when a new instance gets created of this object. This is how my code works: There will start a thread when the constructor gets called of the “2nd”object. This thread gets as Parameter a struct. This is the struct: struct KeyPressData { vector<bool> *AutoPressStatus; vector<int> *AutoPressTime; bool * Destroy; bool * Ready; }; The struct gets filled in the constructor: MultiBoxClient::MultiBoxClient() { //init data DestroyThread = new bool; ReadyThread = new bool; AutoThreadData = new KeyPressData; //Reseting data *DestroyThread = false; *ReadyThread = false; //KeyPressData configurating AutoThreadData->AutoPressStatus = &AutoPressStatus; AutoThreadData->AutoPressTime = &AutoPressTime; AutoThreadData->Destroy = DestroyThread; AutoThreadData->Ready = ReadyThread; //Start the keypress thread CreateThread(NULL,NULL,(LPTHREAD_START_ROUTINE)AutoKeyThread,AutoThreadData,NULL,NULL); } As long as the constructor is running will the program run fine. But when the constructor closes the address of the “AutoThreadData-Destroy” will get corrupted. The program will crash when I call the value of the pointer. void WINAPI AutoKeyThread(void * ThreadData) { KeyPressData * AutoThreadData = (KeyPressData*)ThreadData; while(true) { if(*AutoThreadData->Destroy == true) //CRASH { *AutoThreadData->Ready = true; return; } Sleep(100); } } What did I test: I logged the address of the AutoThreadData and the AutoThreadData-Destroy when the constrcutor is running and clossed; the AutoThreadData address is equal to AutoThreadData when the constructor is closed. So there is no problem here. The address of AutoThreadData-Destroy gets destroyed when the constructor is closed. But how can this happen? The Boolean is on the heap and the KeyPressData struct (AutoThreadData) is on the heap. Destroy before: 00A85328 Destroy after: FEEEFEEE Can someone maby explain why this crash? I know that I can send a pointer to my class to the thread. But I want to know what goes wrong here. That way I can learn from my mistakes. Could someone help me with this problem? Thanks!

  Read the article

• JavaScript - Inheritance in Constructors

  - by j0ker

  For a JavaScript project we want to introduce object inheritance to decrease code duplication. However, I cannot quite get it working the way I want and need some help. We use the module pattern. Suppose there is a super element: a.namespace('a.elements.Element'); a.elements.Element = (function() { // public API -- constructor Element = function(properties) { this.id = properties.id; }; // public API -- prototype Element.prototype = { getID: function() { return this.id; } }; return Element; }()); And an element inheriting from this super element: a.namespace('a.elements.SubElement'); a.elements.SubElement = (function() { // public API -- constructor SubElement = function(properties) { // inheritance happens here // ??? this.color = properties.color; this.bogus = this.id + 1; }; // public API -- prototype SubElement.prototype = { getColor: function() { return this.color; } }; return SubElement; }()); You will notice that I'm not quite sure how to implement the inheritance itself. In the constructor I have to be able to pass the parameter to the super object constructor and create a super element that is then used to create the inherited one. I need a (comfortable) possibility to access the properties of the super object within the constructor of the new object. Ideally I could operate on the super object as if it was part of the new object. I also want to be able to create a new SubElement and call getID() on it. What I want to accomplish seems like the traditional class based inheritance. However, I'd like to do it using prototypal inheritance since that's the JavaScript way. Is that even doable? Thanks in advance! EDIT: Fixed usage of private variables as suggested in the comments. EDIT2: Another change of the code: It's important that id is accessible from the constructor of SubElement.

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38  | Next Page >