- by JT
This is somewhat related to the question posed in this question but I'm trying to do this with an abstract base class.
For the purposes of this example lets use these models:
class Comic(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=20)
desc = models.CharField(max_length=100)
volume = models.IntegerField()
... <50 other things that make up a Comic>
class Meta:
abstract = True
class InkedComic(Comic):
lines = models.IntegerField()
class ColoredComic(Comic):
colored = models.BooleanField(default=False)
In the view lets say we get a reference to an InkedComic id since the tracer, err I mean, inker is done drawing the lines and it's time to add color. Once the view has added all the color we want to save a ColoredComic to the db.
Obviously we could do
inked = InkedComic.object.get(pk=ink_id)
colored = ColoredComic()
colored.name = inked.name
etc, etc.
But really it'd be nice to do:
colored = ColoredComic(inked_comic=inked)
colored.colored = True
colored.save()
I tried to do
class ColoredComic(Comic):
colored = models.BooleanField(default=False)
def __init__(self, inked_comic = False, *args, **kwargs):
super(ColoredComic, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)
if inked_comic:
self.__dict__.update(inked_comic.__dict__)
self.__dict__.update({'id': None}) # Remove pk field value
but it turns out the ColoredComic.objects.get(pk=1) call sticks the pk into the inked_comic keyword, which is obviously not intended. (and actually results in a int does not have a dict exception)
My brain is fried at this point, am I missing something obvious, or is there a better way to do this?
