Search Results

Search found 1447 results on 58 pages for 'routes'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 31/58 | < Previous Page | 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38  | Next Page >

  • ASP.NET MVC routing issue: How to allow "\" in id's

    - by Bipul
    I am using following route map routes.MapRoute( "RenderAssociatedForm", "DoAction/{nodeLevelId}/{nodeSystemId}", new { controller = "FrontEnd", action = "RenderAssociatedForm", }); Now nodeLevelId can be anything like zs\bbal. As we know that we should escape '\', so we are using 'zs%5cbbal'. But still the following url is not mapping to this route. //localhost/DoAction/zs%5cbbal/5 When I try simple Id without the escape character, it maps properly. Can anybody tell me where I am going wrong?

    Read the article

  • Alternative Host (by DNS?) for Web Server Failure Protection

    - by Matrym
    I'm interested in having a second web host run a copy of my website, such that if my first host goes down, the traffic routes to the second host. Is this possible? My guess would be to add additional nameservers beyond the first two. I also suspect it's doable with no-ip.com, but I'm not clear on how that works, and if they would require me to leave my first host entirely?

    Read the article

  • Multi domain rails app. How to intelligently use MVC?

    - by denial
    Background: We have app a, b, and plan to add more apps into this same application. The apps are similar enough they could share many views, assets, and actions. Currently a,b live in a single rails app(2.3.10). c will be similar enough that it could also be in this rails app. The problem: As we continue to add more apps to this one app, there's going to be too much case logic that the app will soon become a nightmare to maintain. There will also be potential namespace issues. However, the apps are very similar in function and layout, it also makes sense to keep them in one app so that it's one app to maintain(since roughly 50% of site look/functionality will be shared). What we are trying to do is keep this as clean as possible so it's easy for multiple teams to work on and easy to maintain. Some things we've thought about/are trying: Engines. Make each app an engine. This would let us base routes on the domain. It also allows us to pull out controllers, models and views for the specific app. This solution does not seem ideal as we won't be reusing the apps any time soon. And explicitly stating the host in the routes doesn't seem right. Skinning/themes. The auth logic would be different between the apps. Each user model would be different. So it's not just a skinning problem. In app/view add folder sitea for sitea views, siteb for siteb views and so on. Do the same for controllers and models. This is still pretty messy and since it didn't follow naming conventions, it did not work with rails so nicely and made much of the code messier. Making another rails app. We just didn't want to maintain the same controller or view in 2 apps if they are identical. What we want to do is make the app intelligently use a controller based on the host. So there would be a sessions controller for each app, and perhaps some parent session controller for shared logic(not needed now). In each of these session controllers, it handles authentication for that specific app. So if the domain is a.mysite.com, it would use session controller for app a and know to use app a's views,models,controllers. And if the domain is b.mysite, it would use the session controller for b. And there would be a user model for a and user model for b, which also would be determined by the domain. Does anyone have any suggestions or experience with this situation? And ideally using rails 2.3.x as updating to rails 3 isn't an option right now.

    Read the article

  • How to map non-REST URLS to REST ones?

    - by Krzysztof Luks
    I have a small rails app that has default scaffold generated routes eg. /stadia/1.xml. However I have to support legacy client app that can't construct such URLs correctly. What I need to do is to map URL in the form: /stadia?id=1?format=xml to /stadia/1.xml Or even something like: /myApp?model=<model_name>?id=<id>?format=xml to /<model_name/<id>.xml Is it possible to craft appropriate route in Rails?

    Read the article

  • url routing access denied

    - by user1600319
    I put the code RouteTable.Routes.MapPageRoute("md", "page1.html/{zxc}", "~/withmaster/page2.aspx"); at golbal Application_Start event .At masterpage link_event Response.Redirect(Page.GetRouteUrl("md", new { zxc = "data" })); Everything ok at local and iis7. The problem is that when i run this on the hosting The access to requested URL has been denied. Do i need some more thing to use url routing ...

    Read the article

  • Routing to a different URLs based on post type

    - by DanCake
    What would be the best way to set up my routes so different types of posts have different URLs? For example, regular posts are /posts/slug while featured posts are /featured/slug Both link to the same controller and action /posts/view/slug. I experimented with different ways of doing this but with little success. Currently my link params look something like the following: array('controller' => 'posts', 'action' => 'view', 'featured' ,$post['Post']['slug'])

    Read the article

  • How to avoid links to map.root getting shortened?

    - by Guy C
    I have a Reports controller and various reports: http://localhost/reports/main/this_month http://localhost/reports/main/last_month http://localhost/reports/main/this_year I wanted http://localhost to default to http://localhost/reports/main/this_month. That is easy enough using map.root in my routes.rb. However when I do this any links to http://localhost/reports/main/this_month are now shortened to just http://localhost. I want the links to stay full

    Read the article

  • Accessing RequestContext from with my MembershipProvider

    - by ScottSEA
    Is there an easier/better way to access the RequestContext from within a custom Membership Provider than the following (and further, will this method even work): private static RequestContext GetRequestContext() { HttpContextBase contextBase = new HttpContextWrapper(HttpContext.Current); return new RequestContext( contextBase, RouteTable.Routes.GetRouteData(contextBase)); }

    Read the article

  • Can I have both index and create actions in the index view?

    - by cravr
    Hi all, Using the perennial example of a Blog webapp (and all resources are currently automatically mapped in routes.rb): I have a simple index page that lists all my Post titles. I would like to add a form at the bottom of this page to quickly create new Posts. I'm new to Rails and can't seem to figure this out! Please help!

    Read the article

  • Createing a Document Workspaces for Workflow in Sharepoint

    - by Tots
    I need to create a workflow that routes a document to a reviewer and upon approval creates a document workspace in SharePoint 2007. Setting up the workflow for the the approval of the document is simple, but I'm unsure of how to create the document workspace upon approval. I want the document workspace to be created programmatically once the document is approved. Can someone recommend an approach for accomplishing this?

    Read the article

  • Sinatra Routing Exceptions

    - by Ethan Turkeltaub
    I want to be able to do the following: get '/:slug' do haml :page end get '/administration' do haml :admin end Is there a way that I can have get '/:slug' do have an exception for /administration? I realize you can do this with if else statements: get '/:slug' do if params[:slug] == 'administration' haml :admin else haml :page end end But that isn't very clean looking. Is there a way to have an exception to routes?

    Read the article

  • Routing optional parameters with dashes in MVC

    - by Géza
    I've made an routing definition like this: routes.MapRoute("ProductSearch", "Search-{MainGroup}-{SubGroup}-{ItemType}", new { controller = "Product", action = "Search", MainGroup = "", SubGroup = "", ItemWebType = ""}); It is not working if the parameters are empty. Actually it resolves the url, so Url.Action method resolves the path "Search-12--" but the link is not working, so the GET of the page is not working With slashes it is working the Url.Action method makes "Search/12" "Search/{MainGroup}/{SubGroup}/{ItemType}" is it somehow possible to correct it?

    Read the article

  • Need Help With ASP.NET Custom Route

    - by Jason
    I need to create a custom route to list all the rooms in a given building. So, I want the url to look something like this: /Building/1000/Room Which would list all the rooms in Building 1000. Is this the correct mapping for the route (to call the IndexByBuilding method in RoomController)? routes.MapRoute( "RoomsByBuilding", "Building/{id}/Room", new { controller = "Room", action = "IndexByBuilding", id = "" } );

    Read the article

  • scope equivalent in rails 2.3.x?

    - by Jacob Relkin
    Is there a way to generate a group of routes under an admin scope without having to create a new physical directory (like namespace requires you to). I know that in Rails 3 there is a scope method on the route mapper, and this appears to do what I want, but apparently it doesn't exist in Rails 2.3.x My goal is to have a route like this: "/admin/products" map to "app/controllers/products_controller, not "app/controllers/admin/products_controller". Is there any way to accomplish this in Rails 2.3.x?

    Read the article

  • Rails routing aliasing and namespaces

    - by kain
    Given a simple namespaced route map.namespace :api do |api| api.resources :genres end how can I reuse this block but with another namespace? Currently I'm achieving that by writing another routes hacked on the fly map.with_options :name_prefix => 'mobile_', :path_prefix => 'mobile' do |mobile| mobile.resources :genres, :controller => 'api/genres' end But it seems less than ideal.

    Read the article

  • Rails3 nomethod error #<ActiveRecord::Relation>

    - by Dodi
    Hi! I'm writing a static page controller. I get the menuname in the routes.rb and it's call the static controller show method. match '/:menuname' = 'static#show' And static_controller.rb: @static=Staticpage.where("menuname = ?", params[:menuname]) But if I want print @static.title in the view, I get this error: undefined method `title' for # Whats wrong? the SQL query looks good: SELECT staticpages.* FROM staticpages WHERE (menuname = 'asd')

    Read the article

  • how to have minimum AreaRegistrations with putting duplicated elements in single place

    - by Sadegh
    hi all, i have several AreaRegistration classes which one each registers own routes and each one have some duplicated elements such as bolded text in below: context.MapRoute("Search", "**{culture}/{style}**/search", new { **culture = cultureValue, style = styleValue,** controller = "search", action = "default" }, new { **culture = new CultureRouteConstraint(), style = new StyleRouteConstraint()** }); how i can have minimum AreaRegistrations with putting duplicated elements in single place which handles that? this is possible?

    Read the article

  • Routing error in rails

    - by user662503
    In my controller I have def update_project_dates p "It is end date....." @user=User.find(params[:user]) @projects=Project.find_all_by_user_id(@user) end In the view page (only some part of the code is copied and pasted) eventDrop: function() { $.ajax({ url:'/update_project_dates/', success:function(data) { alert("Hello"); } }) }, In my routes.rb I have mentioned match '/update_project_dates' => 'users#update_project_dates', :method=> :get get 'update_project_dates' But When the ajax request goes, I get the routing error as Routing Error uninitialized constant UsersController Where am I doing wrong here...Please help..

    Read the article

  • How do I generate a RouteLink to a route in a different area?

    - by Max Schmeling
    I have two different areas, and I have a route in one of those areas that is specific to that area, but I need to generate a link to that route using Html.RouteLink from another area (it's how you get over into the new area) but it won't work... It doesn't seem possible to use RouteLink to routes in a different area. What is the best way around this? Should I just define a new route in the other area and name it differently?

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38  | Next Page >