Search Results

Search found 29121 results on 1165 pages for 'sql 2000'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 317/1165 | < Previous Page | 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324  | Next Page >

  • ASP.NET Sql Timeout

    - by Petoj
    Well we have this Asp.Net application that we installed at a customer but now some times we get a SqlException that says "Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to completion of the operation or the server is not responding." now the wired thing is that the exception comes instantly when i press the button, this does not happen every time i press the button so its random.. any idea what i could try to pinpoint the problem? We are using the EnterpriseLibrary Database block if that matters... Stack trace: at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.OnError(SqlException exception, Boolean breakConnection) at System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.ThrowExceptionAndWarning(TdsParserStateObject stateObj) at System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.Run(RunBehavior runBehavior, SqlCommand cmdHandler, SqlDataReader dataStream, BulkCopySimpleResultSet bulkCopyHandler, TdsParserStateObject stateObj) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlDataReader.ConsumeMetaData() at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlDataReader.get_MetaData() at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.FinishExecuteReader(SqlDataReader ds, RunBehavior runBehavior, String resetOptionsString) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.RunExecuteReaderTds(CommandBehavior cmdBehavior, RunBehavior runBehavior, Boolean returnStream, Boolean async) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.RunExecuteReader(CommandBehavior cmdBehavior, RunBehavior runBehavior, Boolean returnStream, String method, DbAsyncResult result) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.RunExecuteReader(CommandBehavior cmdBehavior, RunBehavior runBehavior, Boolean returnStream, String method) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.ExecuteReader(CommandBehavior behavior, String method) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.ExecuteDbDataReader(CommandBehavior behavior) at Microsoft.Practices.EnterpriseLibrary.Data.Database.DoExecuteReader(DbCommand command, CommandBehavior cmdBehavior) at Microsoft.Practices.EnterpriseLibrary.Data.Database.ExecuteReader(DbCommand command)

    Read the article

  • sql - datetime variable versus string representation of datetime variable

    - by BhejaFry
    Hi folks, I have a query that takes too long to respond when the search parameter happens to be a varchar datatype with date. However, if i convert varchar to datetime variable, the query runs fine. For ex: This takes too long. select count(id) from names where updateddate '1/5/2010' This runs fine. declare @dateparam datetime set @dateparam = convert(datetime, '1/5/2010',102) select count(id) from names where updateddate @dateparam What's the reason one runs fine but the other doesn't? TIA

    Read the article

  • SQL 2003 Distance Latitude Longitude

    - by J.Hendrix
    I have a table full of Dealers along with their latitude and longitude. I am trying to determine the top n closest dealers to any given lat and lon. I already have the function to calculate distance between locations, but I want to do as few calculations as possible (my table can contain many thousands of entries). Currently I have to calculate the distance for each entry then sort them. Is there any way to sort before I do the calculation to improve performance? This question is good, but I will not always know my range. Should I just pick an arbitrarily high range then refine my results? I am thankful for any help the community can offer. declare @Lat real declare @lon real Set @lat = 41.05 Set @lon = -73.53 SELECT top 10 MemberID, Address1, City, State, Zip, Phone, Lat, Lon, (SELECT fun_DistanceLatLon] (@Lat,@lon,Lat,Lon)) as mDistance --Calculate distance FROM Dealers Order by (SELECT fun_DistanceLatLon] (@Lat,@lon,Lat,Lon))

    Read the article

  • How do I free SQLServerCE's COM instance from the current running process?

    - by David Thornley
    It's been a while since I touched COM so be nice ;) This is under WindowsCE 5.0 with SQLServerCE 2.0. After calling this to load SQLServerCE 2.0 : - IDBInitialize *pIDBInitialize = NULL; CoCreateInstance(CLSID_SQLSERVERCE_2_0, NULL, CLSCTX_INPROC_SERVER, IID_IDBInitialize, (void**)&pIDBInitialize); Module load occurs for SSCE20.dll which obviously loads the SQLServerCE engine into the process space. What I don't understand is if I do this immediately after :- pIDBInitialize->Release(); I don't see a dll module unload, so that SSCE20.dll (and friends) are still loaded into my process. Now I tried CoFreeUnusedLibraries() which I figure forces COM to purge any unused libraries, but it doesn't seem to do the trick. At runtime I want to be able to completely unload the SQLServerCE 2.0 dll from the process to streamline an upgrade to 3.5SP1. I suspect this has something to do with the shared dll model that Microsoft use under WindowsCE... but, I might be wrong :) Thanks in advance, David.

    Read the article

  • SQL Server 2008 Running trigger after Insert, Update locks original table

    - by Polity
    Hi Folks, I have a serious performance problem. I have a database with (related to this problem), 2 tables. 1 Table contains strings with some global information. The second table contains the string stripped down to each individual word. So the string is like indexed in the second table, word by word. The validity of the data in the second table is of less important then the validity of the data in the first table. Since the first table can grow like towards 1*10^6 records and the second table having an average of like 10 words for 1 string can grow like 1*10^7 records, i use a nolock in order to read the second this leaves me free for inserting new records without locking it (Expect many reads on both tables). I have a script which keeps on adding and updating rows to the first table in a MERGE statement. On average, the data beeing merged are like 20 strings a time and the scripts runs like ones every 5 seconds. On the first table, i have a trigger which is beeing invoked on a Insert or Update, which takes the newly inserted or updated data and calls a stored procedure on it which makes sure the data is indexed in the second table. (This takes some significant time). The problem is that when having the trigger disbaled, Reading the first table happens in a few ms. However, when enabling the trigger and your in bad luck of trying to read the first table while this is beeing updated, Our webserver gives you a timeout after 10 seconds (which is way to long anyways). I can quess from this part that when running the trigger, the first table is kept (partially) in a lock untill the trigger is completed. What do you think, if i'm right, is there a easy way around this? Thanks in advance! Cheers, Koen

    Read the article

  • LINQ to SQL: To Attach or Not To Attach

    - by bradhe
    So I'm have a really hard time figuring out when I should be attaching to an object and when I shouldn't be attaching to an object. First thing's first, here is a small diagram of my (very simplified) object model. Edit: Okay, apparently I'm not allowed to post images...here you go: http://i.imgur.com/2ROFI.png In my DAL I create a new DataContext every time I do a data-related operation. Say, for instance, I want to save a new user. In my business layer I create a new user. var user = new User(); user.FirstName = "Bob"; user.LastName = "Smith"; user.Username = "bob.smith"; user.Password = StringUtilities.EncodePassword("MyPassword123"); user.Organization = someOrganization; // Assume that someOrganization was loaded and it's data context has been garbage collected. Now I want to go save this user. var userRepository = new RepositoryFactory.GetRepository<UserRepository>(); userRepository.Save(user); Neato! Here is my save logic: public void Save(User user) { if (!DataContext.Users.Contains(user)) { user.Id = Guid.NewGuid(); user.CreatedDate = DateTime.Now; user.Disabled = false; //DataContext.Organizations.Attach(user.Organization); DataContext.Users.InsertOnSubmit(user); } else { DataContext.Users.Attach(user); } DataContext.SubmitChanges(); // Finished here as well. user.Detach(); } So, here we are. You'll notice that I comment out the bit where the DataContext attachs to the organization. If I attach to the organization I get the following exception: NotSupportedException: An attempt has been made to Attach or Add an entity that is not new, perhaps having been loaded from another DataContext. This is not supported. Hmm, that doesn't work. Let me try it without attaching (i.e. comment out that line about attaching to the organization). DuplicateKeyException: Cannot add an entity with a key that is already in use. WHAAAAT? I can only assume this is trying to insert a new organization which is obviously false. So, what's the deal guys? What should I do? What is the proper approach? It seems like L2S makes this quite a bit harder than it should be...

    Read the article

  • NHibernate mapping error SQL Server 2008 Express

    - by developer
    Hi All, I tried an example from NHibernate in Action book and when I try to run the app, it throws an exception saying "Could not compile the mapping document: HelloNHibernate.Employee.hbm.xml" Below is my code, Employee.hbm.xml <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?> <hibernate-mapping xmlns="urn:nhibernate-mapping-2.2" auto-import="true"> <class name="HelloNHibernate.Employee, HelloNHibernate" lazy="false" table="Employee"> <id name="id" access="field"> <generator class="native"/> </id> <property name="name" access="field" column="name"/> <many-to-one access="field" name="manager" column="manager" cascade="all"/> </class> Program.cs using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Linq; using System.Text; using NHibernate; using System.Reflection; using NHibernate.Cfg; namespace HelloNHibernate { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { CreateEmployeeAndSaveToDatabase(); UpdateTobinAndAssignPierreHenriAsManager(); LoadEmployeesFromDatabase(); Console.WriteLine("Press any key to exit..."); Console.ReadKey(); } static void CreateEmployeeAndSaveToDatabase() { Employee tobin = new Employee(); tobin.name = "Tobin Harris"; using (ISession session = OpenSession()) { using (ITransaction transaction = session.BeginTransaction()) { session.Save(tobin); transaction.Commit(); } Console.WriteLine("Saved Tobin to the database"); } } static ISession OpenSession() { if (factory == null) { Configuration c = new Configuration(); c.AddAssembly(Assembly.GetCallingAssembly()); factory = c.BuildSessionFactory(); } return factory.OpenSession(); } static void LoadEmployeesFromDatabase() { using (ISession session = OpenSession()) { IQuery query = session.CreateQuery("from Employee as emp order by emp.name asc"); IList<Employee> foundEmployees = query.List<Employee>(); Console.WriteLine("\n{0} employees found:", foundEmployees.Count); foreach (Employee employee in foundEmployees) Console.WriteLine(employee.SayHello()); } } static void UpdateTobinAndAssignPierreHenriAsManager() { using (ISession session = OpenSession()) { using (ITransaction transaction = session.BeginTransaction()) { IQuery q = session.CreateQuery("from Employee where name='Tobin Harris'"); Employee tobin = q.List<Employee>()[0]; tobin.name = "Tobin David Harris"; Employee pierreHenri = new Employee(); pierreHenri.name = "Pierre Henri Kuate"; tobin.manager = pierreHenri; transaction.Commit(); Console.WriteLine("Updated Tobin and added Pierre Henri"); } } } static ISessionFactory factory; } } Employee.cs using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Linq; using System.Text; namespace HelloNHibernate { class Employee { public int id; public string name; public Employee manager; public string SayHello() { return string.Format("'Hello World!', said {0}.", name); } } } App.config <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?> <configuration> <configSections> <section name="hibernate-configuration" type="NHibernate.Cfg.ConfigurationSectionHandler,NHibernate"/> </configSections> <hibernate-configuration xmlns="urn:nhibernate-configuration-2.2"> <session-factory> <property name="connection.provider">NHibernate.Connection.DriverConnectionProvider</property> <property name="connection.driver_class">NHibernate.Driver.SqlClientDriver</property> <property name="connection.connection_string"> Data Source=SQLEXPRESS2008;Integrated Security=True; User ID=SQL2008;Password=;initial catalog=HelloNHibernate </property> <property name="dialect">NHibernate.Dialect.MsSql2008Dialect</property> <property name="show_sql">false</property> </session-factory> </hibernate-configuration> </configuration>

    Read the article

  • Geolocation SQL query not finding exact location

    - by Iridium52
    I have been testing my geolocation query for some time now and I haven't found any issues with it until now. I am trying to search for all cities within a given radius, often times I'm searching for cities surrounding a city using that city's coords, but recently I tried searching around a city and found that the city itself was not returned. I have these cities as an excerpt in my database: city latitude longitude Saint-Mathieu 45.316708 -73.516253 Saint-Édouard 45.233374 -73.516254 Saint-Michel 45.233374 -73.566256 Saint-Rémi 45.266708 -73.616257 But when I run my query around the city of Saint-Rémi, with the following query... SELECT tblcity.city, tblcity.latitude, tblcity.longitude, truncate((degrees(acos( sin(radians(tblcity.latitude)) * sin(radians(45.266708)) + cos(radians(tblcity.latitude)) * cos(radians(45.266708)) * cos(radians(tblcity.longitude - -73.616257) ) ) ) * 69.09*1.6),1) as distance FROM tblcity HAVING distance < 10 ORDER BY distance desc I get these results: city latitude longitude distance Saint-Mathieu 45.316708 -73.516253 9.5 Saint-Édouard 45.233374 -73.516254 8.6 Saint-Michel 45.233374 -73.566256 5.3 The town of Saint-Rémi is missing from the search. So I tried a modified query hoping to get a better result: SELECT tblcity.city, tblcity.latitude, tblcity.longitude, truncate(( 6371 * acos( cos( radians( 45.266708 ) ) * cos( radians( tblcity.latitude ) ) * cos( radians( tblcity.longitude ) - radians( -73.616257 ) ) + sin( radians( 45.266708 ) ) * sin( radians( tblcity.latitude ) ) ) ),1) AS distance FROM tblcity HAVING distance < 10 ORDER BY distance desc But I get the same result... However, if I modify Saint-Rémi's coords slighly by changing the last digit of the lat or long by 1, both queries will return Saint-Rémi. Also, if I center the query on any of the other cities above, the searched city is returned in the results. Can anyone shed some light on what may be causing my queries above to not display the searched city of Saint-Rémi? I have added a sample of the table (with extra fields removed) below. I'm using MySQL 5.0.45, thanks in advance. CREATE TABLE `tblcity` ( `IDCity` int(1) NOT NULL auto_increment, `City` varchar(155) NOT NULL default '', `Latitude` decimal(9,6) NOT NULL default '0.000000', `Longitude` decimal(9,6) NOT NULL default '0.000000', PRIMARY KEY (`IDCity`) ) ENGINE=MyISAM AUTO_INCREMENT=52743 DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1 AUTO_INCREMENT=52743; INSERT INTO `tblcity` (`city`, `latitude`, `longitude`) VALUES ('Saint-Mathieu', 45.316708, -73.516253), ('Saint-Édouard', 45.233374, -73.516254), ('Saint-Michel', 45.233374, -73.566256), ('Saint-Rémi', 45.266708, -73.616257);

    Read the article

  • Delete record in Linq to Sql

    - by Anders Svensson
    I have Linq2Sql classes User, Page, and UserPage (from a junction table), i.e. a many-to-many relationship. I'm using a gridview to show all Users, with a dropdownlist in each row to show the Pages visited by each user. Now I want to be able to delete records through the gridview, so I have added a delete button in the gridview by setting "Enable deleting" on it. Then I tried to use the RowDeleting event to specify how to delete the records since it doesn't work by default. And because its a relationship I know I need to delete the related records in the junction table before deleting the user record itself, so I added this in the RowDeleting event: protected void GridView2_RowDeleting(object sender, GridViewDeleteEventArgs e) { int id = (int)((DataKey)GridView2.DataKeys[e.RowIndex]).Value; UserPageDBDataContext context = new UserPageDBDataContext(); var userPages = from userPage in context.UserPages where userPage.User.UserID == id select userPage; foreach (var userPage in userPages) context.UserPages.DeleteOnSubmit(userPage); context.SubmitChanges(); var user = context.Users.Single(u => u.UserID == id); context.Users.DeleteOnSubmit(user); context.SubmitChanges(); } This actually seems to delete records, because the record with the id in question does indeed disappear, but strangely, a new record seems to be added at the end...! So, say I have 3 records in the gridview: 1 Jack stackoverflow.com 2 Betty stackoverflow.com/questions 3 Joe stackoverflow.com/whatever Now, if I try to delete user 1 (Jack), record number 1 will indeed disappear in the gridview, but the same record will appear at the end with a new id: 2 Jack stackoverflow.com 3 Betty stackoverflow.com/questions 4 Joe stackoverflow.com/whatever I have tried searching on how to delete records using Linq, and I believe I'm doing exacly as the examples I have read (e.g. the second example here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/Bb386925%28v=VS.100%29.aspx). I have read that you can also set cascade delete on the relationship in the database, but I wanted to do it this way in code, as your supposed to be able to. So what am I doing wrong?

    Read the article

  • SSIS Data Flow Task SQL 2008

    - by Gerard
    Hi All, I am wondering if it is possible to: 1) Develop SSIS Package for Data Flow Task I am aware of how to do this on a local or network SQLServer, However is it possible to create a package that uploads to a "remote" sqlserver, ie one that is not on site or on the LAN. any guidance would be great Thanks

    Read the article

  • SQL Function that calculates Shift from StartTime and EndTime

    - by Gentis
    Hello Folks I have been trying to get a function going that calculates what Shift the Employees worked from their StartTime and EndTime. Here is the code i have so far, there seems to be calculating the shift wrong. Shift 1 from 08:00:00 - 16:30:00 Shift 2 from 16:00:00 - 00:30:00 Shift 3 from 00:00:00 - 08:30:00 Also the shift with most hours wins for times between shifts. Thanks, G `FUNCTION [dbo].[ShiftDifferential] ( @StartTime time(0), @EndTime time(0) ) RETURNS int AS BEGIN --DECLARE @StartTime time(0) --DECLARE @EndTime time(0) -- Declare the return variable here DECLARE @Shift1StartTime time(0) DECLARE @Shift2StartTime time(0) DECLARE @Shift3StartTime time(0) DECLARE @Shift1EndTime time(0) DECLARE @Shift2EndTime time(0) DECLARE @Shift3EndTime time(0) DECLARE @HrsShift1 decimal(18,2) DECLARE @HrsShift2 decimal(18,2) DECLARE @HrsShift3 decimal(18,2) DECLARE @ShiftDiff int --SET @StartTime = '09:00:00' --SET @EndTime = '13:00:00' SET @Shift1StartTime = '08:00:00' SET @Shift2StartTime = '16:00:00' SET @Shift3StartTime = '00:00:00' SET @Shift1EndTime = '16:30:00' SET @Shift2EndTime = '00:30:00' SET @Shift3EndTime = '08:30:00' --SELECT DATEDIFF(HH, @Shift1StartTime, @EndTime) -- hours are between shift 3 and shift 1 if DATEDIFF(HH, @Shift1StartTime, @StartTime) < 0 AND (DATEDIFF(hh, @Shift1StartTime, @EndTime) < 8.0 AND DATEDIFF(hh, @Shift1StartTime, @EndTime) 0) begin --PRINT 'Shift 3-1 step1' SET @HrsShift3 = DATEDIFF(HH, @StartTime, @Shift1StartTime) SET @HrsShift1 = DATEDIFF(HH, @Shift1StartTime, @Endtime) --PRINT @HrsShift3 --PRINT @HrsShift1 -- get shift with most hours if @HrsShift3 @HrsShift1 begin SET @ShiftDiff = 3 end else begin SET @ShiftDiff = 1 end end -- hours are in shift 1 if (DATEDIFF(HH, @Shift1StartTime, @StartTime) = 0 AND DATEDIFF(HH, @Shift1StartTime, @EndTime) <= 8) OR (DATEDIFF(HH, @Shift1StartTime, @StartTime) 0 AND DATEDIFF(HH, @Shift1StartTime, @EndTime) <= 8) begin --PRINT 'Shift 1 step2' SET @HrsShift3 = 0 SET @HrsShift1 = DATEDIFF(HH, @StartTime, @EndTime) --PRINT @HrsShift3 --PRINT @HrsShift1 -- only one shift with hours SET @ShiftDiff = 1 end -- hours are between shift 1 and shift 2 if DATEDIFF(HH, @Shift2StartTime, @StartTime) < 0 and (DATEDIFF(HH, @Shift2StartTime, @EndTime) < 8.0 AND DATEDIFF(HH, @Shift2StartTime, @EndTime) 0) begin --PRINT 'Shift 1-2 step1' SET @HrsShift1 = DATEDIFF(HH, @StartTime, @Shift2StartTime) SET @HrsShift2 = DATEDIFF(HH, @Shift2StartTime, @Endtime) --PRINT @HrsShift1 --PRINT @HrsShift2 -- get the shift with most hours if @HrsShift1 @HrsShift2 begin SET @ShiftDiff = 1 end else begin SET @ShiftDiff = 2 end end -- hours are in shift 2 if (DATEDIFF(HH, @Shift2StartTime, @StartTime) = 0 AND DATEDIFF(HH, @Shift2StartTime, @EndTime) <= 8) OR (DATEDIFF(HH, @Shift2StartTime, @StartTime) 0 AND DATEDIFF(HH, @Shift2StartTime, @EndTime) <= 8) begin --PRINT 'Shift 2 step2' SET @HrsShift3 = 0 SET @HrsShift1 = DATEDIFF(HH, @StartTime, @EndTime) --PRINT @HrsShift3 --PRINT @HrsShift1 -- only one shift with hours SET @ShiftDiff = 2 end -- hours are between shift 2 and shift 3 - overnight shift if DATEDIFF(HH, @StartTime, @EndTime) < 0 begin --PRINT 'Shift 2-3 step1' SET @HrsShift2 = DATEDIFF(HH, @StartTime, '23:59:59') + DATEDIFF(HH, '00:00:00', '00:30:00') SET @HrsShift3 = DATEDIFF(HH, '00:30:00', @EndTime) --PRINT @HrsShift2 --PRINT @HrsShift3 -- get the shift with most hours if @HrsShift2 @HrsShift3 begin SET @ShiftDiff = 2 end else begin SET @ShiftDiff = 3 end end -- hours are in shift 3 if (DATEDIFF(HH, @Shift3StartTime, @StartTime) = 0 AND DATEDIFF(HH, @Shift3StartTime, @EndTime) <= 8) OR (DATEDIFF(HH, @Shift3StartTime, @StartTime) 0 AND DATEDIFF(HH, @Shift3StartTime, @EndTime) <= 8) begin --PRINT 'Shift 3 step2' SET @HrsShift2 = 0 SET @HrsShift3 = DATEDIFF(HH, @StartTime, @EndTime) --PRINT @HrsShift2 --PRINT @HrsShift3 -- only one shift with hours SET @ShiftDiff = 3 end RETURN @ShiftDiff; END`

    Read the article

  • Query design in SQL - ORDER BY SUM() of field in rows which meet a certain condition

    - by Christian Mann
    OK, so I have two tables I'm working with - project and service, simplified thus: project ------- id PK name str service ------- project_id FK for project time_start int (timestamp) time_stop int (timestamp) One-to-Many relationship. Now, I want to return (preferably with one query) a list of an arbitrary number of projects, sorted by the total amount of time spent at them, which is found by SUM(time_stop) - SUM(time_start) WHERE project_id = something. So far, I have SELECT project.name FROM service LEFT JOIN project ON project.id = service.project_id LIMIT 100 but I cannot figure out how what to ORDER BY.

    Read the article

  • SQL 2005 indexed queries slower than unindexed queries

    - by uos??
    Adding a seemingly perfectly index is having an unexpectedly adverse affect on a query performance... -- [Data] has a predictable structure and a simple clustered index of the primary key: ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Data] ADD PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED ( [ID] ) -- My query, joins on itself looking for a certain kind of "overlapping" records SELECT DISTINCT [Data].ID AS [ID] FROM dbo.[Data] AS [Data] JOIN dbo.[Data] AS [Compared] ON [Data].[A] = [Compared].[A] AND [Data].[B] = [Compared].[B] AND [Data].[C] = [Compared].[C] AND ([Data].[D] = [Compared].[D] OR [Data].[E] = [Compared].[E]) AND [Data].[F] <> [Compared].[F] WHERE 1=1 AND [Data].[A] = @A AND @CS <= [Data].[C] AND [Data].[C] < @CE -- Between a range [Data] has about a quarter-million records so far, 10% to 50% of the data satisfies the where clause depending on @A, @CS, and @CE. As is, the query takes 1 second to return about 300 rows when querying 10%, and 30 seconds to return 3000 rows when querying 50% of the data. Curiously, the estimated/actual execution plan indicates two parallel Clustered Index Scans, but the clustered index is only of the ID, which isn't part of the conditions of the query, only the output. ?? If I add this hand-crafted [IDX_A_B_C_D_E_F] index which I fully expected to improve performance, the query slows down by a factor of 8 (8 seconds for 10% & 4 minutes for 50%). The estimated/actual execution plans show an Index Seek, which seems like the right thing to be doing, but why so slow?? CREATE UNIQUE INDEX [IDX_A_B_C_D_E_F] ON [dbo].[Data] ([A], [B], [C], [D], [E], [F]) INCLUDE ([ID], [X], [Y], [Z]); The Data Engine Tuning wizard suggests a similar index with no noticeable difference in performance from this one. Moving AND [Data].[F] <> [Compared].[F] from the join condition to the where clause makes no difference in performance. I need these and other indexes for other queries. I'm sure I could hint that the query should refer to the Clustered Index, since that's currently winning - but we all know it is not as optimized as it could be, and without a proper index, I can expect the performance will get much worse with additional data. What gives?

    Read the article

  • Linq-to-sql Compiled Query is returning result from different DataContext

    - by Vladimir Kojic
    Compiled query: public static Func<OperationalDataContext, short, Machine> QueryMachineById = CompiledQuery.Compile((OperationalDataContext db, short machineID) => db.Machines.Where(m => m.MachineID == machineID).SingleOrDefault()); It looks like compiled query is caching Machine object and returning the same object even if query is called from new DataContext (I’m disposing DataContext in the service but I’m getting Machine from previous DataContext). I use POCOs and XML mapping. Revised: It looks like compiled query is returning result from new data context and it is not using the one that I passed in compiled-query. Therefore I can not reuse returned object and link it to another object obtained from datacontext thru non compiled queries. I’m using unit of work pattern : // First Call Using(new DataContext) { Machine from DataContext.Table == machine from cached query } // Do some work // Second Call is failing Using(new DataContext) { Machine from DataContext.Table <> machine from cached query }

    Read the article

  • How to change the primary key to be non-clustered?

    - by AngryHacker
    Part-time reluctant DBA here. I want to change an existing primary key index from clustered to non-clustered. And the syntax is escaping me. This is how it's scripted out right now. ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Config] WITH NOCHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [PK_Config] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED ( [ConfigID] ) ON [PRIMARY] I am not seeing an ALTER CONSTRAINT statement in the online docs.

    Read the article

  • SQL Query to retrieve highest item up to a point in a group

    - by James
    The best way of describing this is I have a table of people with their names and ages. Assume that people with the same surname are from the same family. I need a query in oracle which will retrieve a list of the oldest person in each family, but not older than a certain age. Table: person name surname age =============================== James Smith 23 Sarah Powell 17 Barry Smith 31 Mark Smith 35 Mary Smith 18 Bob Powell 30 How do I retrieve the oldest person in each family under 30? Results I'm after name surname age =============================== James Smith 23 Sarah Powell 17

    Read the article

  • SQL COUNT of COUNT

    - by cryptic-star
    I have some data I am querying. The table is composed of two columns - a unique ID, and a value. I would like to count the number of times each unique value appears (which can easily be done with a COUNT and GROUP BY), but I then want to be able to count that. So, I would like to see how many items appear twice, three times, etc. So for the following data (ID, val)... 1, 2 2, 2 3, 1 4, 2 5, 1 6, 7 7, 1 The intermediate step would be (val, count)... 1, 3 2, 3 7, 1 And I would like to have(count_from_above, new_count)... 3, 2 -- since three appears twice in the previous table 1, 1 -- since one appears once in the previous table Is there any query which can do that? If it helps, I'm working with Postgres. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • SQL Replace Into question

    - by Matt
    With Replace Into, if I have two fields. FirstName LastName. The table has John Smith in it, if I was to run REPLACE INTO tblNames (FirstName, LastName) VALUES (John, Jones) Would that replace Smith with Jones, or create a new name? What determines if its an Update or and Insert?

    Read the article

  • Linq-to-sql Compiled Query returning object NOT belonging to submitted DataContext

    - by Vladimir Kojic
    Compiled query: public static class Machines { public static readonly Func<OperationalDataContext, short, Machine> QueryMachineById = CompiledQuery.Compile((OperationalDataContext db, short machineID) => db.Machines.Where(m => m.MachineID == machineID).SingleOrDefault() ); public static Machine GetMachineById(IUnitOfWork unitOfWork, short id) { Machine machine; // Old code (working) //var machineRepository = unitOfWork.GetRepository<Machine>(); //machine = machineRepository.Find(m => m.MachineID == id).SingleOrDefault(); // New code (making problems) machine = QueryMachineById(unitOfWork.DataContext, id); return machine; } It looks like compiled query is caching Machine object and returning the same object even if query is called from new DataContext (I’m disposing DataContext in the service but I’m getting Machine from previous DataContext). I use POCOs and XML mapping. Revised: It looks like compiled query is returning result from new data context and it is not using the one that I passed in compiled-query. Therefore I can not reuse returned object and link it to another object obtained from datacontext thru non compiled queries. [TestMethod] public void GetMachinesTest() { // Test Preparation (not important) using (var unitOfWork = IoC.Get<IUnitOfWork>()) { var machineRepository = unitOfWork.GetRepository<Machine>(); // GET ALL List<Machine> list = machineRepository.FindAll().ToList<Machine>(); VerifyIntegratedMachine(list[2], 3, "Machine 3", "333333", "G300PET", "MachineIconC.xaml", false, true, LicenseType.Licensed, "10.0.97.3", "10.0.97.3", 0); var machine = Machines.GetMachineById(unitOfWork, 3); Assert.AreSame(list[2], machine); // PASS !!!! } using (var unitOfWork = IoC.Get<IUnitOfWork>()) { var machineRepository = unitOfWork.GetRepository<Machine>(); // GET ALL List<Machine> list = machineRepository.FindAll().ToList<Machine>(); VerifyIntegratedMachine(list[2], 3, "Machine 3", "333333", "G300PET", "MachineIconC.xaml", false, true, LicenseType.Licensed, "10.0.97.3", "10.0.97.3", 0); var machine = Machines.GetMachineById(unitOfWork, 3); Assert.AreSame(list[2], machine); // FAIL !!!! } } If I run other (complex) unit tests I'm getting as expected: An attempt has been made to Attach or Add an entity that is not new, perhaps having been loaded from another DataContext.

    Read the article

  • SQL: Daily Average of Logins Per Hour

    - by jerrygarciuh
    This query is producing counts of logins per hour: SELECT DATEADD(hour, DATEDIFF(hour, 0, EVENT_DATETIME), 0), COUNT(*) FROM EVENTS_ALL_RPT_V1 WHERE EVENT_NAME = 'Login' AND EVENT_DATETIME >= CONVERT(DATETIME, '2010-03-17 00:00:00', 120) AND EVENT_DATETIME <= CONVERT(DATETIME, '2010-03-24 00:00:00', 120) GROUP BY DATEADD(hour, DATEDIFF(hour, 0, EVENT_DATETIME), 0) ORDER BY DATEADD(hour, DATEDIFF(hour, 0, EVENT_DATETIME), 0) ...with lots of results like this: Datetime COUNT(*) ---------------------------------- 2010-03-17 12:00:00.000 135 2010-03-17 13:00:00.000 129 2010-03-17 14:00:00.000 147 What I need to figure out is how to query the average logins per hour for a given day. Any help?

    Read the article

  • LINQ to SQL - Tracking New / Dirty Objects

    - by Joseph Sturtevant
    Is there a way to determine if a LINQ object has not yet been inserted in the database (new) or has been changed since the last update (dirty)? I plan on binding my UI to LINQ objects (using WPF) and need it to behave differently depending whether or not the object is already in the database. MyDataContext context = new MyDataContext(); MyObject obj; if (new Random().NextDouble() > .5) obj = new MyObject(); else obj = context.MyObjects.First(); // How can I distinguish these two cases? The only simple solution I can think of is to set the primary key of new records to a negative value (my PKs are an identity field and will therefore be set to a positive integer on INSERT). This will only work for detecting new records. It also requires identity PKs, and requires control of the code creating the new object. Is there a better way to do this? It seems like LINQ must be internally tracking the status of these objects so that it can know what to do on context.SubmitChanges(). Is there some way to access that "object status"? Clarification Apparently my initial question was confusing. I'm not looking for a way to insert or update records. I'm looking for a way, given any LINQ object, to determine if that object has not been inserted (new) or has been changed since its last update (dirty).

    Read the article

  • C# LINQ to SQL Except Operator

    - by kb
    Hi i have a list of event Ids that i want to be excluded from my select statement, but no sure how to implement this: this is what stores my list of event Ids List<int> ExcludedEvents; and this is my select statement (from an XML feed) var allEvents = from eventsList in xmlDoc.Elements("shows").Elements("Show") select new EventFeed() { EventName = eventsList.Attribute("Name").Value, EventSummary = eventsList.Attribute("ShortDesc").Value, EventDetails = eventsList.Attribute("LongDesc").Value, EventShowCode = eventsList.Attribute("Code").Value }; i want to select all events except for the events that have their eventId matching the EventShowCode value i have looked at the except operator, but not sure how to implement it thanks

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324  | Next Page >