Search Results

Search found 6399 results on 256 pages for 'a record'.

Page 32/256 | < Previous Page | 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39  | Next Page >

  • Entityframework duplicate record on second insert

    - by Delysid
    I am building an application for recipe/meal planning, and i have come across a problem i cant seem to figure out. i have a table for units of measure, where i keep the used units in, i only want unique units in here (for grocery list calculation and so forth) but if i use a unit from the table on a recipe, the first time it is okay, nothing is inserted in units of measure, but the second time i get a "duplicate". i suspect it has something to do with entitykey, because the primary key is identity column on the sql server (2008 r2) for some reason it works to change the objectstate on some objects (courses, see code) and that does not generate a duplicate, but that does not work on the unit of measure my insert methods looks like this : public recipe Create(recipe recipe) { using (RecipeDataContext ctx = new RecipeDataContext()) { foreach (recipe_ingredient rec_ing in recipe.recipe_ingredient) { if (rec_ing.ingredient.ingredient_id == 0) { ingredient ing = (from _ing in ctx.ingredients where _ing.name == rec_ing.ingredient.name select _ing).FirstOrDefault(); if (ing != null) { rec_ing.ingredient_id = ing.ingredient_id; rec_ing.ingredient = null; } } if (rec_ing.unit_of_measure.unit_of_measure_id == 0) { unit_of_measure _uom = (from dbUom in ctx.unit_of_measure where dbUom.unit == rec_ing.unit_of_measure.unit select dbUom).FirstOrDefault(); if (_uom != null) { rec_ing.unit_of_measure_id = _uom.unit_of_measure_id; rec_ing.unit_of_measure = null; } } ctx.Recipes.AddObject(recipe); //for some reason it works to change object state of this, and not generate a duplicate ctx.ObjectStateManager.ChangeObjectState(recipe.courses[0], EntityState.Unchanged); } ctx.SaveChanges(); } return recipe; } My datamodel looks like this : http://i.imgur.com/NMwZv.png

    Read the article

  • why is Active Record firing extra query when I use Includes method to fetch data

    - by riddhi_agrawal
    I have the following model structure: class Group < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :group_products, :dependent => :destroy has_many :products, :through => :group_products end class Product < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :group_products, :dependent => :destroy has_many :groups, :through => :group_products end class GroupProduct < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :group belongs_to :product end I wanted to minimize my database queries so I decided to use includes.In the console I tried something like, groups = Group.includes(:products) my development logs show the following calls, Group Load (403.0ms) SELECT `groups`.* FROM `groups` GroupProduct Load (60.0ms) SELECT `group_products`.* FROM `group_products` WHERE (`group_products`.group_id IN (1,3,14,15,16,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,33,42,49,51)) Product Load (22.0ms) SELECT `products`.* FROM `products` WHERE (`products`.`id` IN (382,304,353,12,63,103,104,105,262,377,263,264,265,283,284,285,286,287,302,306,307,308,328,335,336,337,340,355,59,60,61,247,309,311,66,30,274,294,324,350,140,176,177,178,64,240,327,332,338,380,383,252,254,255,256,257,325,326)) Product Load (10.0ms) SELECT `products`.* FROM `products` WHERE (`products`.`id` = 377) LIMIT 1 I could analyze the initial three calls were necessary but don't get the reason why the last database call is made, Product Load (10.0ms) SELECT `products`.* FROM `products` WHERE (`products`.`id` = 377) LIMIT 1 Any idea why this is happening? Thanks in advance. :)

    Read the article

  • DataSet.GetChanges - Save the updated record in a different table than the source one

    - by John Dev
    I'm doing operation on a dataset containing data from a sql table named Test_1 and then get the updated records using the DataSet.GetChanges(DataRowState.Modified) function. Then i try to save the dataset containing the updated records on a different table than the source one (the table is names Test and has the same structure as Test_1) using the following statement: sqlDataAdapter.Update(changesDataSet,"Test"); I'm getting the following error : Update unable to find TableMapping['Test'] or DataTable 'Test' I'm new to ado.net and don't even know if it"s something possible. Any advice is welcome. Just to provide a bit of context. ETL jobs are importing data in temp table with same structure as the original but with _jobid suffix. Right after a rule engine is doing validation before updating the original table.

    Read the article

  • rails active record - Advanced find

    - by par
    I have the following model setup - a User is interested in projects in many project Categories. Each Project has many categories. Like so: class User has_many :projects has_and_belongs_to_many :project_categories class Project belongs_to :user has_and_belongs_to_many :project_categories class ProjectCategory has_and_belongs_to_many :projects has_and_belongs_to_many :users Now, I'd like to do a find for projects with any of the catogories that a certain user are interested in, i.e. if a user is interested in project categories A,B,C then I'd like to find projects which are part of one or more of those project categories. Anyone?

    Read the article

  • dealing with a large flat data files with a very big record length

    - by gsp
    I have a large data file that is creatd from a shell script. Next script processes it by sorting and reading several times, that takes more than 14 hours, it is not viable. I want to replace this long running script with a program, probably in JAVA, C, or COBOl, that can run on windows or on sun solaris. I have to read a group of records everytime, sort and process and write to the output sort file and at the same time insert into db2/sql tables.

    Read the article

  • This query show me with this active record

    - by New Kid
    I am having trouble getting two tables and passing them to controller: IN A MODEL: function get_all_entries() { $query = $this->db->get('entry'); return $query->result(); $this->db->select('entry_id , count(comment_id) as total_comment'); $this->db->group_by('entry_id'); $comment = $this->db->get('comment'); return $comment->result(); } IN A CONTROLLER: $data['query'] = $this->blog_model->get_all_entries(); $this->load->view('blog/index',$data); How do I return $query and $comment variables to controller? I think I am doing it wrong.

    Read the article

  • Concatenate multi value into one record.

    - by mikehjun
    I joined two tables together and what I like to do is concatenate multi vaule in one records without duplicated value. TAXLOT_ZONE TID ZONE 1 A 1 A 1 B 1 C 2 D 2 D 2 E 3 A 3 B 4 C 5 D Desirable Final table looks like; TID ZONE 1 A, B, C 2 D, E 3 A, B 4 C 5 D

    Read the article

  • Row for each hour even if there is no record

    - by peku33
    I've got a trouble with creating mysql Query. My PHP script executes this query on each run: INSERT INTO Executes SET UserIp='%s' (%s is user IP) Executes table is: ExecuteId UNSIGNED BIGINT AI PRIMARY Date TIMESTAMP DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP INDEX UserIp CHAR(24) ... | Some Columns I want to retrive number of Executes in each hour. The most obvious solution would be: SELECT COUNT(*) as ExecutesNum, DATE(Date) as D, HOUR(Date) as H GROUP BY D, H And it works, BUT it does not create rows for hours where there were no executes. What should I modify to get result like: 1 | 2012-09-01 | 14 **0 | 2012-09-01 | 15** 11 | 2012-09-01 | 16 1 | 2012-09-01 | 17

    Read the article

  • Invalid Active Record Statement Rails 2.3.16

    - by Ranzit
    I am using rails 2.3.16 ruby 1.8.7 For the following line of code I ma getting error as follows: Code: ForeignScheduledItem.find(:all, :conditions => { :foreign_scheduled_item => { :scheduled_items => { :subscription_id => params[:subscription_id] } } }, :joins => :scheduled_item).each { |i| @subscriptions.push(Subscription.find_by_id(i.subscription_id)) } Error: ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid (ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid): Can u please help in this regard.

    Read the article

  • Codeigniter Active record help

    - by sea_1987
    Hello, I am trying to increment a INT column by 1 if a certain field is not null on an update request, currently I have this update too columns, public function updateCronDetails($transaction_reference, $flag, $log) { $data = array ( 'flag' => $flag, 'log' => "$log" ); $this->db->where('transaction_reference', $transaction_reference); $this->db->update('sy_cron', $data); } What I need to know is how I can check if the value being sent to the log field is NULL and if it is how could I increment a column called count by 1?

    Read the article

  • Grabbing the right record in a drop down from mysql

    - by 86Stang
    I'm using a form where the user can edit an entry. Everything is populating and all is well with the exception that I can't get the drop down to show the project that they've already assigned the image to. $project_qry = "SELECT * from projects ORDER BY title ASC"; $project_res = mysql_query($project_qry); $project_drop = "<select name=\"project_id\">\n"; while ($row = mysql_fetch_array($project_res)) { if ($project_id == $row[title]) { $project_drop .= "<option value=\"$row[id]\" selected>$row[title]</option>\n"; } else { $project_drop .= "<option value=\"$row[id]\">$row[title]</option>\n"; } } $project_drop .= "</select>\n"; I'm sure it's something devilishly simple but I'm stumped.

    Read the article

  • How to get search engines to properly index an ajax driven search page

    - by Redtopia
    I have an ajax-driven search page that will allow users to search through a large collection of records. Each search result points to index.php?id=xyz (where xyz is the id of the record). The initial view does not have any records listed, and there is no interface that allows you to browse through all records. You can only conduct a search. How do I build the page so that spiders can crawl each record? Or is there another way (outside of this specific search page) that will allow me to point spiders to a list of all records. FYI, the collection is rather large, so dumping links to every record in a single request is not a workable solution. Outputting the records must be done in multiple requests. Each record can be viewed via a single page (eg "record.php?id=xyz"). I would like all the records indexed without anything indexed from the sitemap that shows where the records exist, for example: <a href="/result.php?id=record1">Record 1</a> <a href="/result.php?id=record2">Record 2</a> <a href="/result.php?id=record3">Record 3</a> <a href="/seo.php?page=2">next</a> Assuming this is the correct approach, I have these questions: How would the search engines find the crawl page? Is it possible to prevent the search engines from indexing the words "Record 1", etc. and "next"? Can I output only the links? Or maybe something like:  

    Read the article

  • Inserting Records in Ascending Order function- C homework assignment

    - by Aaron McRuer
    Good day, Stack Overflow. I have a homework assignment that I'm working on this weekend that I'm having a bit of a problem with. We have a struct "Record" (which contains information about cars for a dealership) that gets placed in a particular spot in a linked list according to 1) its make and 2) according to its model year. This is done when initially building the list, when a "int insertRecordInAscendingOrder" function is called in Main. In "insertRecordInAscendingOrder", a third function, "createRecord" is called, where the linked list is created. The function then goes to the function "compareCars" to determine what elements get put where. Depending on the value returned by this function, insertRecordInAscendingOrder then places the record where it belongs. The list is then printed out. There's more to the assignment, but I'll cross that bridge when I come to it. Ideally, and for the assignment to be considered correct, the linked list must be ordered as: Chevrolet 2012 25 Chevrolet 2013 10 Ford 2010 5 Ford 2011 3 Ford 2012 15 Honda 2011 9 Honda 2012 3 Honda 2013 12 Toyota 2009 2 Toyota 2011 7 Toyota 2013 20 from the a text file that has the data ordered the following way: Ford 2012 15 Ford 2011 3 Ford 2010 5 Toyota 2011 7 Toyota 2012 20 Toyota 2009 2 Honda 2011 9 Honda 2012 3 Honda 2013 12 Chevrolet 2013 10 Chevrolet 2012 25 Notice that the alphabetical order of the "make" field takes precedence, then, the model year is arranged from oldest to newest. However, the program produces this as the final list: Chevrolet 2012 25 Chevrolet 2013 10 Honda 2011 9 Honda 2012 3 Honda 2013 12 Toyota 2009 2 Toyota 2011 7 Toyota 2012 20 Ford 2010 5 Ford 2011 3 Ford 2012 15 I sat down with a grad student and tried to work out all of this yesterday, but we just couldn't figure out why it was kicking the Ford nodes down to the end of the list. Here's the code. As you'll notice, I included a printList call at each instance of the insertion of a node. This way, you can see just what is happening when the nodes are being put in "order". It is in ANSI C99. All function calls must be made as they are specified, so unfortunately, there's no real way of getting around this problem by creating a more efficient algorithm. #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #define MAX_LINE 50 #define MAX_MAKE 20 typedef struct record { char *make; int year; int stock; struct record *next; } Record; int compareCars(Record *car1, Record *car2); void printList(Record *head); Record* createRecord(char *make, int year, int stock); int insertRecordInAscendingOrder(Record **head, char *make, int year, int stock); int main(int argc, char **argv) { FILE *inFile = NULL; char line[MAX_LINE + 1]; char *make, *yearStr, *stockStr; int year, stock, len; Record* headRecord = NULL; /*Input and file diagnostics*/ if (argc!=2) { printf ("Filename not provided.\n"); return 1; } if((inFile=fopen(argv[1], "r"))==NULL) { printf("Can't open the file\n"); return 2; } /*obtain values for linked list*/ while (fgets(line, MAX_LINE, inFile)) { make = strtok(line, " "); yearStr = strtok(NULL, " "); stockStr = strtok(NULL, " "); year = atoi(yearStr); stock = atoi(stockStr); insertRecordInAscendingOrder(&headRecord,make, year, stock); } printf("The original list in ascending order: \n"); printList(headRecord); } /*use strcmp to compare two makes*/ int compareCars(Record *car1, Record *car2) { int compStrResult; compStrResult = strcmp(car1->make, car2->make); int compYearResult = 0; if(car1->year > car2->year) { compYearResult = 1; } else if(car1->year == car2->year) { compYearResult = 0; } else { compYearResult = -1; } if(compStrResult == 0 ) { if(compYearResult == 1) { return 1; } else if(compYearResult == -1) { return -1; } else { return compStrResult; } } else if(compStrResult == 1) { return 1; } else { return -1; } } int insertRecordInAscendingOrder(Record **head, char *make, int year, int stock) { Record *previous = *head; Record *newRecord = createRecord(make, year, stock); Record *current = *head; int compResult; if(*head == NULL) { *head = newRecord; printf("Head is null, list was empty\n"); printList(*head); return 1; } else if ( compareCars(newRecord, *head)==-1) { *head = newRecord; (*head)->next = current; printf("New record was less than the head, replacing\n"); printList(*head); return 1; } else { printf("standard case, searching and inserting\n"); previous = *head; while ( current != NULL &&(compareCars(newRecord, current)==1)) { printList(*head); previous = current; current = current->next; } printList(*head); previous->next = newRecord; previous->next->next = current; } return 1; } /*creates records from info passed in from main via insertRecordInAscendingOrder.*/ Record* createRecord(char *make, int year, int stock) { printf("CreateRecord\n"); Record *theRecord; int len; if(!make) { return NULL; } theRecord = malloc(sizeof(Record)); if(!theRecord) { printf("Unable to allocate memory for the structure.\n"); return NULL; } theRecord->year = year; theRecord->stock = stock; len = strlen(make); theRecord->make = malloc(len + 1); strncpy(theRecord->make, make, len); theRecord->make[len] = '\0'; theRecord->next=NULL; return theRecord; } /*prints list. lists print.*/ void printList(Record *head) { int i; int j = 50; Record *aRecord; aRecord = head; for(i = 0; i < j; i++) { printf("-"); } printf("\n"); printf("%20s%20s%10s\n", "Make", "Year", "Stock"); for(i = 0; i < j; i++) { printf("-"); } printf("\n"); while(aRecord != NULL) { printf("%20s%20d%10d\n", aRecord->make, aRecord->year, aRecord->stock); aRecord = aRecord->next; } printf("\n"); } The text file you'll need for a command line argument can be saved under any name you like; here are the contents you'll need: Ford 2012 15 Ford 2011 3 Ford 2010 5 Toyota 2011 7 Toyota 2012 20 Toyota 2009 2 Honda 2011 9 Honda 2012 3 Honda 2013 12 Chevrolet 2013 10 Chevrolet 2012 25 Thanks in advance for your help. I shall continue to plow away at it myself.

    Read the article

  • How do I record audio through M-Audio Keystudio?

    - by interstar
    Hi, I'm trying to get my M-Audio Keystudio (which has an audio input as well as the keyboard) to record audio to Audacity. I'm in Ubuntu 10.10. When I look at the Sound Preferences I can select "M-Audio RunTime DFU Analog Stereo" as my input device. However, when I try to record in Audacity, Audacity remains frozen. The program seems to be running and recording, but the recording cursor won't advance. If I reset the audio input to the internal sound card, recording works normally. Any ideas what to look for?

    Read the article

  • SAS enregistre un chiffre d'affaires record sur 2010, les solutions analytiques sont de plus en plus populaires

    SAS enregistre un chiffre d'affaires record sur 2010 Les solutions analytiques sont de plus en plus populaires SAS, un des éditeurs leaders du décisionnel et de la Business Analytics, a enregistré en 2010 un chiffre d'affaires record de 2,43 milliards de dollars ? en progression de 5,2 % par rapport à l'exercice 2009. Le segment des activités analytiques de l'éditeur affiche un bond de 26 %. Pour Jim Goodnight, CEO de SAS, cette croissance dans le domaine analytique est due à la prise de conscience par les entreprises, que ces solutions mettent à leur disposition des informations pertinentes et exploitables issues de leurs données dont le volume connaît une croissance exponentiell...

    Read the article

  • Where can I find SPF record information for Network Solution hosted email?

    - by Steve Brown
    I have a client who has their e-mail hosted with Network Solutions and some of the e-mails they are sending are going to spam. I've searched Google for information on network solutions and SPF records but all the results have to do with "how to set up an SPF record" - which I understand how to do. The problem is that I can't find any information about what SPF records to use for network solutions hosted e-mail. I even tried lookup up spf records on networksolutions.com but it appears there are none. Where can I find SPF record information for Network Solution hosted email?

    Read the article

  • Set modified date = created date or null on record creation?

    - by User
    I've been following the convention of adding created and modified columns to most of my database tables. I also have been leaving the modified column as null on record creation and only setting a value on actual modification. The other alternative is to set the modified date to be equal to created date on record creation. I've been doing it the former way but I recent ran into one con which is seriously making me think of switching. I needed to set a database cache dependency to find out if any existing data has been changed or new data added. Instead of being able to do the following: SELECT MAX(modified) FROM customer I have to do this: SELECT GREATEST(MAX(created), MAX(modified)) FROM customer The negative being that it's a more complicated query and slower. Another thing is in file systems I believe they usually use the second convention of setting modified date = created date on creation. What are the pros and cons of the different methods? That is, what are the issues to consider?

    Read the article

  • IBM, numéro 1 des dépôts de brevets pour la 18eme année consécutive avec un record de 5.896 brevets, Microsoft dans le top 3

    IBM, numéro 1 des dépôts de brevets pour la 18eme année consécutive Avec un record de 5 896 brevets, Samsung et Microsoft dans le top 3 IBM est une fois de plus le numéro 1 dans le classement annuel des entreprises ayant déposé le plus de brevets au cours de l'année 2010. Les chercheurs de la firme ont réalisé un record avec un dépôt de 5 896 brevets au cours de l'année 2010, soit une augmentation de 10 % par rapport à l'année précédente. Ce chiffre fait de « Big Blue » la première ayant déposé plus de 5000 brevets au cours d'une année. C'est la 18eme année consécutive qu'IBM occupe cette place de numéro 1. Ces brevets touchent des domaines très variés. La fi...

    Read the article

  • Using a trigger to record audit information vs. stored procedure

    - by Germ
    Suppose you have the following... An ASP.NET web application that calls a stored procedure to delete a record. The table has a trigger on it that will insert an audit entry each time a record is deleted. I want to be able to record in the audit entry the username of who deleted the record. What would be the best way to go about achieving this? I know I could remove the trigger and have the delete stored procedure insert the audit entry prior to deleting but are there any other recommeded alternative? If a username was passed as a parameter to the delete stored procedure, is there anyway to get this value in the trigger that's excuted when the record is deleted? I'm just throwing this out there...

    Read the article

  • Symfony, in remote host: Error 500. Unknown record property / related component "algorithm" on "sfGu

    - by user248959
    Hi, after deploying, i get the error below after loggingin. Sf 1.3, sfDoctrineGuardPlugin. And i have this schema.yml in config/doctrine: Usuario: inheritance: extends: sfGuardUser type: simple columns: username: type: string(128) notnull: false unique: true nombre_apellidos: string(60) sexo: string(5) fecha_nac: date provincia: string(60) localidad: string(255) email_address: string(255) fotografia: string(255) avatar: string(255) avatar_mensajes: string(255) relations: Usuario: local: user1_id foreign: user2_id refClass: AmigoUsuario equal: true 500 | Internal Server Error | Doctrine_Record_UnknownPropertyException Unknown record property / related component "algorithm" on "sfGuardUser" stack trace * at () in SF_ROOT_DIR/lib/vendor/symfony/lib/plugins/sfDoctrinePlugin/lib/vendor/doctrine/Doctrine/Record/Filter/Standard.php line 55 ... 52. */ 53. public function filterGet(Doctrine_Record $record, $name) 54. { 55. throw new Doctrine_Record_UnknownPropertyException(sprintf('Unknown record property / related component "%s" on "%s"', $name, get_class($record))); 56. } 57. } * at Doctrine_Record_Filter_Standard->filterGet(object('sfGuardUser'), 'algorithm') in SF_ROOT_DIR/lib/vendor/symfony/lib/plugins/sfDoctrinePlugin/lib/vendor/doctrine/Doctrine/Record.php line 1382 ... 1379. $success = false; 1380. foreach ($this->_table->getFilters() as $filter) { 1381. try { 1382. $value = $filter->filterGet($this, $fieldName); 1383. $success = true; 1384. } catch (Doctrine_Exception $e) {} 1385. } * at Doctrine_Record->_get('algorithm', 1) in SF_ROOT_DIR/lib/vendor/symfony/lib/plugins/sfDoctrinePlugin/lib/vendor/doctrine/Doctrine/Record.php line 1337 ... 1334. return $this->$accessor($load); 1335. } 1336. } 1337. return $this->_get($fieldName, $load); 1338. } 1339. 1340. protected function _get($fieldName, $load = true) * at Doctrine_Record->get('algorithm') in SF_ROOT_DIR/lib/vendor/symfony/lib/plugins/sfDoctrinePlugin/lib/record/sfDoctrineRecord.class.php line 212 ... 209. return call_user_func_array( 210. array($this, $verb), 211. array_merge(array($entityName), $arguments) 212. ); 213. } else { 214. $failed = true; 215. } * at sfDoctrineRecord->__call(array(object('sfGuardUser'), 'get'), array('algorithm')) in n/a line n/a ... * at sfGuardUser->getAlgorithm('getAlgorithm', array()) in SF_ROOT_DIR/plugins/sfDoctrineGuardPlugin/lib/model/doctrine/PluginsfGuardUser.class.php line 96 ... 93. */ 94. public function checkPasswordByGuard($password) 95. { 96. $algorithm = $this->getAlgorithm(); 97. if (false !== $pos = strpos($algorithm, '::')) 98. { 99. $algorithm = array(substr($algorithm, 0, $pos), substr($algorithm, $pos + 2)); * at PluginsfGuardUser->checkPasswordByGuard() in SF_ROOT_DIR/plugins/sfDoctrineGuardPlugin/lib/model/doctrine/PluginsfGuardUser.class.php line 83 ... 80. } 81. else 82. { 83. return $this->checkPasswordByGuard($password); 84. } 85. } 86. * at PluginsfGuardUser->checkPassword('m') in SF_ROOT_DIR/lib/sfGuardValidatorUserByEmail.class.php line 28 ... 25. { 26. // password is ok? 27. 28. if ($user->checkPassword($password)) 29. { 30. 31. //die("entro"); * at sfGuardValidatorUserByEmail->doClean('m') Any idea? Javi

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39  | Next Page >