Search Results

Search found 14739 results on 590 pages for 'mssql 2008'.

Page 329/590 | < Previous Page | 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336  | Next Page >

  • Tutorials - Getting Started

    - by Rodney Vinyard
    Walkthrough: Creating And Using Ajax-Enabled Web Service http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb532367(v=vs.90).aspx  Getting Started with jQuery in Visual Studio 2008 http://blogs.microsoft.co.il/blogs/bursteg/archive/2009/06/05/getting-started-with-jquery-in-visual-studio-2008.aspx  jQuery Examples http://www.w3schools.com/jquery/jquery_examples.asp  Ajax Control Toolkit http://www.asp.net/ajaxlibrary/act.ashx

    Read the article

  • Creating a Server Level Audit the Easy Way

    Part 1 of "Auditing made easy by Microsoft SQL Server 2008" covered the various components for auditing and the action groups provided by Microsoft SQL Server 2008. This installment illustrates how to create Server Level Audit, test the audit and retrieve the audit records.

    Read the article

  • Mis à jour : Configuration d'une infrastructure à clés publiques à 2 niveaux sous Windows Server 200

    Configuration d'une infrastructure à clés publiques à 2 niveaux sous Windows 2008 (R2), par Michaël Todorovic Citation: Ce document va vous permettre de mettre en place une infrastructure à clés publiques (aussi nommée PKI) à deux niveaux grâce à Microsoft Windows 2008. Cette PKI pourra vous être utile dans beaucoup de cas : serveur web sécurisé, serveur de messagerie sécurisé, distribution automatisée de cert...

    Read the article

  • But what version is the database now?

    - by BuckWoody
    When you upgrade your system to SQL Server 2008 R2, you’ll know that the instance is at that version by using the standard commands like SELECT @@VERSION or EXEC xp_msver. My system came back with this info when I typed those: Microsoft SQL Server 2008 R2 (RTM) - 10.50.1600.1 (Intel X86)   Apr  2 2010 15:53:02   Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation  Developer Edition on Windows NT 6.0 <X86> (Build 6002: Service Pack 2) (Hypervisor) Index Name Internal_Value Character_Value 1 ProductName NULL Microsoft SQL Server 2 ProductVersion 655410 10.50.1600.1 3 Language 1033 English (United States) 4 Platform NULL NT INTEL X86 5 Comments NULL SQL 6 CompanyName NULL Microsoft Corporation 7 FileDescription NULL SQL Server Windows NT 8 FileVersion NULL 2009.0100.1600.01 ((KJ_RTM).100402-1540 ) 9 InternalName NULL SQLSERVR 10 LegalCopyright NULL Microsoft Corp. All rights reserved. 11 LegalTrademarks NULL Microsoft SQL Server is a registered trademark of Microsoft Corporation. 12 OriginalFilename NULL SQLSERVR.EXE 13 PrivateBuild NULL NULL 14 SpecialBuild 104857601 NULL 15 WindowsVersion 393347078 6.0 (6002) 16 ProcessorCount 1 1 17 ProcessorActiveMask 1 1 18 ProcessorType 586 PROCESSOR_INTEL_PENTIUM 19 PhysicalMemory 2047 2047 (2146934784) 20 Product ID NULL NULL   But a database properties are separate from the Instance. After an upgrade, you always want to make sure that the compatibility options (which have much to do with how NULLs and other objects are treated) is at what you expect. For the most part, as long as the application can handle it, I set my compatibility levels to the latest version. For SQL Server 2008, that was “10.0” or “10”. You can do this with the ALTER DATABASE command or you can just right-click the database and select “Properties” and then “Database Options” in SQL Server Management Studio. To check the database compatibility level, I use this query: SELECT name, cmptlevel FROM sys.sysdatabases When I did that this morning I saw that the databases (all of them) were at 10.0 – not 10.5 like the Instance. That’s expected – we didn’t revise the database format up with the Instance for this particular release. Didn’t want to catch you by surprise on that. While your databases should be at the “proper” level for your situation, you can’t rely on the compatibility level to indicate the Instance level. More info on the ALTER DATABASE command in SQL Server 2008 R2 is here: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb510680(SQL.105).aspx Share this post: email it! | bookmark it! | digg it! | reddit! | kick it! | live it!

    Read the article

  • Great finds: More TechNet Survival Guides

    - by Enrique Lima
    It has been some time now since Windows Server 2008 R2 arrived, but the features and capabilities in many cases are just now starting to surface with company’s implementing or looking at using. Here is a link to the Survival Guide on TechNet: http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/windows-server-2008-r2-survival-guide.aspx The other item that is coming stronger and stronger is PowerShell.  I mentioned before the need to learn and get into using it as it is a great tool. http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/windows-powershell-survival-guide.aspx

    Read the article

  • Updated Master Data Services Documentation and Resources

    - by mattande
    (This post was contributed by Reagan Templin, Lead Technical Writer for the MDS Team) With the release of SQL Server 2008 R2, it’s a great time to check out the updated documentation and resources for the release, and for SQL Server 2008 R2 Master Data Services ("MDS") in particular. As you saw in the last post ( New White Papers Available ), there are some great white papers available on MSDN to get you going with MDS. Below you’ll find more information about other updated and newly published content....(read more)

    Read the article

  • Certification Progress

    - by NeilHambly
    Like a lot of us, I had set myself some goals @ the start of the year, and I did not make them all that easy I had set myself the goal to become Microsoft certified in SQL Server 2008 & 2012 {the details on what exactly where the 2012 certifications where not clear when the goal was initially set} I duly spent the best part of the 1st half of the year, in studies for and taking the 4 exams to become an MCITP 2008 SQL Server for both Database Administrator & Developer Exam 70-432 This was...(read more)

    Read the article

  • ClearTrace for SQL Server 2012

    - by Bill Graziano
    I’ve updated the beta for ClearTrace that support SQL Server 2012.  This requires SQL Server 2012 to be installed on the computer where ClearTrace is running.  It will read traces from SQL Server 2008 R2, SQL Server 2008 and SQL Server 2005. It includes some minor improvements in performance and handling large SQL statements. It should also give better errors. If you do find any of those errors, please report them in the support forum.

    Read the article

  • Connect to SQL Express database (5 replies)

    I have just joined the &quot;I'm sure I've missed something obvious club&quot; I have VBExpress 2008 installed with SQL Express 2008 with the SQL Express management studio. I started building a prototype database in Management Studio: nothing complex, just a cascade of administratve tables to create a logical context for the real data. Next I created a project which would provide simple linked controls to p...

    Read the article

  • Connect to SQL Express database (5 replies)

    I have just joined the &quot;I'm sure I've missed something obvious club&quot; I have VBExpress 2008 installed with SQL Express 2008 with the SQL Express management studio. I started building a prototype database in Management Studio: nothing complex, just a cascade of administratve tables to create a logical context for the real data. Next I created a project which would provide simple linked controls to p...

    Read the article

  • Are products like MSSQL Server and Oracle are "ORDBMS"?

    - by n10i
    According to wikipedia! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ORDBMS IBM's DB2, Oracle database, and Microsoft SQL Server, make claims to support this technology and do so with varying degrees of success So, are these products true "ORDBMS" like PostgreSQL? or they are they are long way from it? can someone plz! point me to any link where i can read about the features still to be implemented by these RDBMS to become true ORDBMS!

    Read the article

  • How to track changes in many MSSQL databases from .NET application?

    - by Yauheni Sivukha
    Problem: There are a lot of different databases, which is populated by many different applications directly (without any common application layer). Data can be accessed only through SP (by policy) Task: Application needs to track changes in these databases and react in minimal time. Possible solutions: 1) Create trigger for each table in each database, which will populate one table with events. Application will watch this table through SqlDependency. 2) Watch each table in each database through SqlDependency. 3) Create trigger for each table in each database, which will notify application using managed extension. Which is the best way?

    Read the article

  • MSSQL STOREDPROC SELECTING FROM A FIELD FROM 1 TABLE USING LIKE TO CREATE MORE THAN 1 COLUM IN A DAT

    - by djshortbus
    I have a ASPX.NET DataGrid and im trying to USE a select LIKE 'X'% from a table that has 1 field called location. im trying to display the locations that start with a certain letter (example wxxx,axxx,fxxx,) in different columns in my data grid. SELECT DISTINCT LM.LOCATION AS '0 LOCATIONS' , LM.COUNTLEVEL AS 'COUNTLEVEL' FROM SOH S WITH(NOLOCK) JOIN LOCATIONMASTER LM ON LM.LMID = S.LMID WHERE LM.COUNTLEVEL = 1 AND LM.LOCATION NOT IN ('RECOU','PROBLEM','TOSTOCK','PYXVLOC') AND LM.LOCATION LIKE '0%' SELECT DISTINCT LM.LOCATION AS 'A LOCATIONS' , LM.COUNTLEVEL AS 'COUNTLEVEL' FROM SOH S WITH(NOLOCK) JOIN LOCATIONMASTER LM ON LM.LMID = S.LMID WHERE LM.COUNTLEVEL = 1 AND LM.LOCATION NOT IN ('RECOU','PROBLEM','TOSTOCK','PYXVLOC') AND LM.LOCATION LIKE 'A%'

    Read the article

  • In MSSQL, how do I create a reference variable to a table?

    - by Jón Trausti
    Hello. I'm currently using sp_executesql to execute a T-SQL statement with a dynamic table name. However, it is really ugly to see something like: set sql = 'UPDATE '+Table_Name+' SET ... WHERE '+someVar+' = ... AND '+someVar2' = ...' sp_executesql sql What I would rather like to have is a TABLE variable of which is a reference to a table, so I could do for example: UPDATE TableRef SET ... WHERE ... Because when I have really long T-SQL statements it gets really hard to read due to the format of it within a string. Any suggestions would be helpful. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Why hasn't MSSQL made a WHERE clause mandatory by default?

    - by Josh Einstein
    It seems like a no brainer to me. I've heard countless stories about people forgetting the WHERE clause in an UPDATE or DELETE and trashing an entire table. I know that careless people shouldn't be issuing queries directly and all that... and that there are legitimate cases where you want to affect all rows, but wouldn't it make sense to have an option on by default that requires such queries to be written like: UPDATE MyTable SET MyColumn = 0 WHERE * Or without changing the language, UPDATE MyTable SET MyColumn = 0 WHERE 1 = 1 -- tacky, I know

    Read the article

  • Need Opinions: Should an ASP.NET Application allow administrators to change MSSQL connection?

    - by Brent Pabst
    As the title suggests: What is your opinion on allowing administrators to update the SQL Connection string dynamically from the application versus just showing them the connection details in the application? Because the database connection is so important and on a heavily used system the abrupt change to the connection seems like it could cause problems. However I would think displaying the server and catalog and whether the connection is using SSPI or SQL Auth could be helpful for administrators who don't like playing with .NET config files. Thoughts?

    Read the article

  • MSSQL 2005: Update rows in a specified order (like ORDER BY)?

    - by JMTyler
    I want to update rows of a table in a specific order, like one would expect if including an ORDER BY clause, but MS SQL does not support the ORDER BY clause in UPDATE queries. I have checked out this question which supplied a nice solution, but my query is a bit more complicated than the one specified there. UPDATE TableA AS Parent SET Parent.ColA = Parent.ColA + (SELECT TOP 1 Child.ColA FROM TableA AS Child WHERE Child.ParentColB = Parent.ColB ORDER BY Child.Priority) ORDER BY Parent.Depth DESC; So, what I'm hoping that you'll notice is that a single table (TableA) contains a hierarchy of rows, wherein one row can be the parent or child of any other row. The rows need to be updated in order from the deepest child up to the root parent. This is because TableA.ColA must contain an up-to-date concatenation of its own current value with the values of its children (I realize this query only concats with one child, but that is for the sake of simplicity - the purpose of the example in this question does not necessitate any more verbosity), therefore the query must update from the bottom up. The solution suggested in the question I noted above is as follows: UPDATE messages SET status=10 WHERE ID in (SELECT TOP (10) Id FROM Table WHERE status=0 ORDER BY priority DESC ); The reason that I don't think I can use this solution is because I am referencing column values from the parent table inside my subquery (see WHERE Child.ParentColB = Parent.ColB), and I don't think two sibling subqueries would have access to each others' data. So far I have only determined one way to merge that suggested solution with my current problem, and I don't think it works. UPDATE TableA AS Parent SET Parent.ColA = Parent.ColA + (SELECT TOP 1 Child.ColA FROM TableA AS Child WHERE Child.ParentColB = Parent.ColB ORDER BY Child.Priority) WHERE Parent.Id IN (SELECT Id FROM TableA ORDER BY Parent.Depth DESC); The WHERE..IN subquery will not actually return a subset of the rows, it will just return the full list of IDs in the order that I want. However (I don't know for sure - please tell me if I'm wrong) I think that the WHERE..IN clause will not care about the order of IDs within the parentheses - it will just check the ID of the row it currently wants to update to see if it's in that list (which, they all are) in whatever order it is already trying to update... Which would just be a total waste of cycles, because it wouldn't change anything. So, in conclusion, I have looked around and can't seem to figure out a way to update in a specified order (and included the reason I need to update in that order, because I am sure I would otherwise get the ever-so-useful "why?" answers) and I am now hitting up Stack Overflow to see if any of you gurus out there who know more about SQL than I do (which isn't saying much) know of an efficient way to do this. It's particularly important that I only use a single query to complete this action. A long question, but I wanted to cover my bases and give you guys as much info to feed off of as possible. :) Any thoughts?

    Read the article

  • is there a tool to see the difference between two database tables in mssql?

    - by reinier
    What is a good tool to see the differences between 2 tables (or even better, the datasets returned by 2 queries). EDIT: I'm not interested in the schema changes. Just assume that the schemas are the same. background as to why: I'm porting some legacy code which can fill a database with some pre-calced data. The easiest way to see if I got everything right, is to check the output of the old program, with the new one. I was thinking that if there is some kind of 'diff' tool for databases, this might be great.

    Read the article

  • Why is doing a top(1) on an indexed column in mssql slow?

    - by reinier
    I'm puzzled by the following. I have a DB with around 10 million rows, and (among other indices) on 1 column is an index. Now I have 700k rows where the campaignid is indeed 3835 For all these rows, the connectionid is the same. I just want to find out this connectionid. use messaging_db; SELECT TOP (1) connectionid FROM outgoing_messages WITH (NOLOCK) WHERE (campaignid_int = 3835) Now this query takes approx 30 seconds to perform! I (with my small db knowledge) would expect that it would take any of the rows, and return me that connectionid If I test this same query for a campaign which only has 1 entry, it goes really fast. So the index works. How would I tackle this and why does this not work?

    Read the article

  • MSSQL: Primary Key Schema Largely Guid but Sometimes Integer Types...

    - by Code Sherpa
    OK, this may be a silly question but... I have inherited a project and am tasked with going over the primary key relationships. The project largely uses Guids. I say "largely" because there are examples where tables use integral types to reflect enumerations. For example, dbo.MessageFolder has MessageFolderId of type int to reflect public emum MessageFolderTypes { inbox = 1, sent = 2, trash = 3, etc... } This happens a lot. There are tables with primary keys of type int which is unavoidable because of their reliance on enumerations and tables with primary keys of type Guid which reflect the primary key choice on the part of the previous programmer. Should I care that the PK schema is spotty like this? It doesn't feel right but does it really matter? If this could create a problem, how do I get around it (I really can't move all PKs to type int without serious legwork and I have never heard of enumerations that have guid values)? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • whatz wrong in this SELECt query of MSSQL... ?

    - by user522211
    Protected Sub Page_Load(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Me.Load Dim SQLData As New System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection("Data Source=.\SQLEXPRESS;AttachDbFilename=|DataDirectory|\Database.mdf;Integrated Security=True;User Instance=True") Dim cmdSelect As New System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand("SELECT * FROM Table1 WHERE Date =" & TextBox1.Text & "'", SQLData) SQLData.Open() Dim dtrReader As System.Data.SqlClient.SqlDataReader = cmdSelect.ExecuteReader() While dtrReader.Read() For j As Integer = 1 To 31 Dim s As String = "s" & j If dtrReader(s.ToString()).ToString() = "b" Then Dim img As ImageButton = DirectCast(Panel1.FindControl(s.ToString()), ImageButton) img.ImageUrl = "~/Images/booked.gif" img.Enabled = False End If Next End While dtrReader.Close() SQLData.Close() End Sub SHOWS AN ERROR : Unclosed quotation mark after the character string ''.

    Read the article

  • MSSQL. Compare columns in two tables.

    - by maxt3r
    Hi, i've recently done a migration from a really old version of some application to the current version and i faced some problems while migrating databases. I need a query that could help me to compare columns in two tables. I mean not the data in rows, i need to compare the columns itself to figure out, what changes in table structure i've missed.

    Read the article

  • MSSQL / T-SQL : How to update equal percentages of a resultset?

    - by Kent Comeaux
    I need a way to take a resultset of KeyIDs and divide it up as equally as possible and update records differently for each division based on the KeyIDs. In other words, there is SELECT KeyID FROM TableA WHERE (some criteria exists) I want to update TableA 3 different ways by 3 equal portions of KeyIDs. UPDATE TableA SET FieldA = Value1 WHERE KeyID IN (the first 1/3 of the SELECT resultset above) UPDATE TableA SET FieldA = Value2 WHERE KeyID IN (the second 1/3 of the SELECT resultset above) UPDATE TableA SET FieldA = Value3 WHERE KeyID IN (the third 1/3 of the SELECT resultset above) or something to that effect. Thanks for any and all of your responses.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336  | Next Page >