Search Results

Search found 3025 results on 121 pages for 'amazon ec2'.

Page 33/121 | < Previous Page | 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40  | Next Page >

• How to setup matlab for parallel processing on Amazon EC2?

  - by JohnIdol

  I just setup a Extra Large Heavy Computation EC2 instance to throw it at my Genetic Algorithms problem, hoping to speed up things. This instance has 8 Intel Xeon processors (around 2.4Ghz each) and 7 Gigs of RAM. On my machine I have an Intel Core Duo, and matlab is able to work with my two cores just fine. On the EC2 instance though, matlab only is capable of detecting 1 out of 8 processors. Obviously the difference is that I have my 2 cores on a single processor, while the EC2 instance has 8 distinct processors. My question is, how do I get matlab to work with those 8 processors? I found this paper, but it seems related to setting up matlab with multiple EC2 instances, which is not my problem. Any help appreciated!

  Read the article

• Amazon Web Services promet de baisser ses prix en 2012, entretien avec Matt Wood, Technology Evangelist EMEA chez Amazon

  Amazon Web Services promet de baisser encore ses prix en 2012 Entretien avec Matt Wood, Technology Evangelist EMEA chez Amazon Les Cloud dédiés aux développeurs se multiplient. Ils mettent tous en avant les mêmes avantages : flexibilité, facturation à la demande, gestion externalisée de l'infrastructure, et aujourd'hui simplification des outils d'administration. Après avoir interviewé Laurent Lesaicherre, le responsable chez Microsoft France de la plateforme Windows Azure, il nous est apparu intéressant de continuer ce tour d'horizon du marché avec un de ses précurseurs : Amazon. Il y a maintenant cinq ans, ...

  Read the article

• Securing ClickOnce hosted with Amazon S3 Storage

  - by saifkhan

  Well, since my post on hosting ClickOnce with Amazon S3 Storage, I've received quite a few emails asking how to secure the deployment. At the time of this post I regret to say that there is no way to secure your ClickOnce deployment hosted with Amazon S3. The S3 storage is secured by ACL meaning that a username and password will have to be provided before access. The Amazon CloudFront, which sits on top of S3, allows you to apply security settings to your CloudFront distribution by Applying an encryption to the URL. Restricting by IP. The problem with the CloudFront is that the encryption of the URL is mandatory. ClickOnce does not provide a way to pass the "Amazon Public Key" to the CloudFront URL (you probably can if you start editing the XML and HTML files ClickOnce generate but that defeats the porpose of ClickOnce all together). What would be nice is if Amazon can allow users to restrict by IP addresses or IP Blocks. I'd sent them an email and received a response that this is something they are looking into...I won't hold my breadth though. Alternative I suggest you look at Rack Space Cloud hosting http://www.rackspacecloud.com they have very competitive pricing and recently started hosting Windows Virtual Servers. What you can do is rent a virtual server, setup IIS to host your ClickOnce applications. You can then use IIS security setting to restrict what IP/Blocks can access your ClickOnce payloads. Note: You don't really need Windows Server to host ClickOnce. Any web server can do. If you are familiar with Linux you can run that VM with rackspace for half the price of Windows. I hope you found this information helpful.

  Read the article

• Transparent Technology from Amazon

  - by David Dorf

  Amazon has been making some interesting moves again, this time in the augmented humanity area.  Augmented humanity is about helping humans overcome their shortcomings using technology.  Putting a powerful smartphone in your pocket helps you in many ways like navigating streets, communicating with far off friends, and accessing information.  But the interface for smartphones is somewhat limiting and unnatural, so companies have been looking for ways to make the technology more transparent and therefore easier to use. When Apple helped us drop the stylus, we took a giant leap forward in simplicity.  Using touchscreens with intuitive gestures was part of the iPhone's original appeal.  People don't want to know that technology is there -- they just want the benefits.  So what's the next leap beyond the touchscreen to make smartphones even easier to use? Two natural ways we interact with the world around us is by using sight and voice.  Google and Apple have been using both in their mobile platforms for limited uses cases.  Nobody actually wants to type a text message, so why not just speak it?  Any if you want more information about a book, why not just snap a picture of the cover?  That's much more accurate than trying to key the title and/or author. So what's Amazon been doing?  First, Amazon released a new iPhone app called Flow that allows iPhone users to see information about products in context.  Yes, its an augmented reality app that uses the phone's camera to view products, and overlays data about the products on the screen.  For the most part it requires the barcode to be visible to correctly identify the product, but I believe it can also recognize certain logos as well.  Download the app and try it out but don't expect perfection.  Its good enough to demonstrate the concept, but its far from accurate enough.  (MobileBeat did a pretty good review.)  Extrapolate to the future and we might just have a heads-up display in our eyeglasses. The second interesting area is voice response, for which Siri is getting lots of attention.  Amazon may have purchased a voice recognition company called Yap, although the deal is not confirmed.  But it would make perfect sense, especially with the Kindle Fire in Amazon's lineup. I believe over the next 3-5 years the way in which we interact with smartphones will mature, and they will become more transparent yet more important to our daily lives.  This will, of course, impact the way we shop, making information more readily accessible than it already is.  Amazon seems to be positioning itself to be at the forefront of this trend, so we should be watching them carefully.

  Read the article

• Email notification and mail server

  - by Jerr Wu

  I am building a web application with email notification just like Facebook, which will host in http://www.linode.com/. When a user A comment to a post, the poster will get an email notification from '[email protected]' with the comment message written by user A. (Not spam) I really like Google Apps but they have sending limits 2000 sending per day, that is not suit for my case becuz I cannot have sending limits. There will be many email notifications. http://support.google.com/a/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=166852 I also need company email accounts for team members use which I prefer Google Apps. My web application will host in linode, I am considering "Amazon Simple Notification Service" for the email notification. My questions are Any other recommend email service provider suits my case for me? Can I bind company email accounts(ex: [email protected]) with Google Apps and bind [email protected] with other email service provider?

  Read the article

• How can I limit CloudFront downloads

  - by Alex Crouzen

  I'm looking to use Amazon's CloudFront to host some content in the near future. Currently, I'm keeping it very simple and I'm just uploading my content to S3 and then making a distribution available via Cloudfront. However, because I have a limited budget, I'd like to be able to limit the number of downloads or the money spent on bandwidth. As far as I can see, I can't set any quotas or budgets like you can in Google's App Engine, so I'm looking for another way of doing this. Has anyone had any experience doing this? One approach I'm thinking of is having to place a webserver with redirects in between, but that kind of defeats the simplicity of CF for me.

  Read the article

• Amazon S3 supporte CORS, la spécification ouvre les ressources de la plateforme Cloud aux applications Web

  Amazon S3 supporte CORS la spécification ouvre les ressources de la plateforme Cloud aux applications Web Amazon Web Services (AWS) a ajouté le support de la spécification CORS (Cross-Origin Resource Sharing) à sa plateforme Cloud Amazon S3. CORS est une norme qui offre aux développeurs la possibilité de créer des applications Web qui effectuent des demandes à des domaines autres que celui qui a fourni le contenu principal. L'intégration de CORS à Amazon S3 permet désormais de créer plus facilement des applications Web qui accèdent aux données stockées sur la plateforme Cloud. Les développeurs peuvent utiliser la spécification CORS pour créer des applications Web en JavaScript et ...

  Read the article

• AWS RDS Timeout

  - by warder57

  I know next to nothing about networking/servers. So I'm assuming I'm missing something obvious. All of the resources I can find on this, either don't work or are outdated. I created a brand new AWS account on the free plan. I created a postgres RDS DB instance. I made sure that this RDS instance is set to publicly accessible. This RDS instance has the default VPC/Security Group settings. In order to connect to this DB from my local machine, I used pgadmin3 and followed the instructions provided on the AWS documentation page. Seen here: http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonRDS/latest/UserGuide/USER_ConnectToPostgreSQLInstance.html I've double checked all of the information required to connect: Host: whatever.whatever.us-west-2.rds.amazonaws.com Port: 5432 Username: USERNAME Password: PASSWORD When I try to connect to the database, my connection fails due to a timeout. (During step 4 in the above guide.) Can anyone point me to whatever I am missing? Thanks in advance

  Read the article

• RDS Replication across regions

  - by Bryan Migliorisi

  We are using Amazon AWS for our web services but given the recent instabilities in their infrastructure, we are trying to figure out how to run our application across multiple regions for additional redundancy. Ideally, we would run our entire app in a active-active configuration in multiple regions but our main concern is that we are using RDS, which I understand cannot replicate across regions. One possible solution (though we have not tried or proven it would work) would be to do mysqldump or EBS snapshots every hour or so but this would mean that we would be forced to run in an active-passive configuration. Our data would be at most an hour behind. This carries its own issues around data synchronization when we failover and the master comes back up, so its not the best solution. Are there any proven solutions for replicating RDS across regions?

  Read the article

• Why S3 website redirect location is not followed by CloudFront?

  - by ychaze

  I have a website hosted on Amazon S3. It is the new version of an old website hosted on WordPress. I have set up some files with the metadata Website Redirect Locationto handle old location and redirect them to the new website pages. For example: I had http://www.mysite.com/solution that I want to redirect to http://mysite.s3-website-us-east-1.amazonaws.com/product.html So I created an empty file named solutioninside my bucket with the correct metadata: Website Redirect Location= /product.html The S3 redirect metadata is equivalent to a 301 Moved Permanentlythat is great for SEO. This works great when accessing the URL directly from S3 domain. I have also set up a CloudFront distribution based on the website bucket. And when I try to access through my distribution, the redirect does not work, ie: http://xxxx123.cloudfront.net/solution does not redirect but download the empty file instead. So my question is how to keep the redirection through the CloudFront distribution ? Or any idea on how to handle the redirection without deteriorate SEO ? Thanks

  Read the article

• Mobile (Client) to Amazon S3 (Server) - Architecture

  - by wasabii

  let's start off with the problem statement: My iOS application has a login form. When the user logs in, a call is made to my API and access granted or denied. If access was granted, I want the user to be able to upload pictures to his account and/or manage them. As storage I've picked Amazon S3, and I figured it'd be a good idea to have one bucket called "myappphotos" for instance, which contains lots of folders. The folder names are hashes of a user's email and a secret key. So, every user has his own, unique folder in my Amazon S3 bucket. Since I've just recently started working with AWS, here's my question: What are the best practices for setting up a system like this? I want the user to be able to upload pictures directly to Amazon S3, but of course I cannot hard-code the access key. So I need my API to somehow talk to Amazon and request an access token of sorts - only for the particular folder that belongs to the user I'm making the request for. Can anyone help me out and/or guide me to some sources where a similar problem was addressed? Don't think I'm the first one and the amazon documentation is so extensive that I don't really know where to start looking. Thanks a lot!

  Read the article

• AWS Load Balancer with a static IP address

  - by user965904

  I have a set-up running on Amazon cloud with a couple of EC2 Instances running through a load balancer. It is important that the site has a unique(static) IP or set of IPs as I'm plugging in 3rd party APIs which only accept requests made from IPs which have been added to their whitelist. So basically unless we can give these 3rd parties a static IP or range of IPs that the requests from the site will always come from then we would be unable to make any calls to them. Anyone knows how to achieve this as I know that Elastic IPs are not compatible with load balancers? If I were to look up the IP of the load balancer DNS name (e.g. dualstack.awseb-BAMobile-ENV-xxxxxxxxx.eu-west-1.elb.amazonaws.com resolves to 200.200.200.200) would that IP be Static? Any help/advise is greatly appreciated guys.

  Read the article

• Why is uploading to S3 so slow?

  - by Tom Marthenal

  I am using s3cmd to upload to S3: # s3cmd put 1gb.bin s3://my-bucket/1gb.bin 1gb.bin -> s3://my-bucket/1gb.bin [1 of 1] 366706688 of 1073741824 34% in 371s 963.22 kB/s I am uploading from Linode, which has an outgoing bandwidth cap of 50 Mb/s according to support (roughly 6 MB/s). Why am I getting such slow upload speeds to S3, and how can I improve them? Update: Uploading the same file via SCP to an m1.medium EC2 instance (SCP from my Linode to the instance's EBS drive) gives about 44 Mb/s according to iftop (any compression done by the cipher is not a factor). Traceroute: Here's a traceroute to the server it's uploading to (according to tcpdump). # traceroute s3-1-w.amazonaws.com. traceroute to s3-1-w.amazonaws.com. (72.21.194.32), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 207.99.1.13 (207.99.1.13) 0.635 ms 0.743 ms 0.723 ms 2 207.99.53.41 (207.99.53.41) 0.683 ms 0.865 ms 0.915 ms 3 vlan801.tbr1.mmu.nac.net (209.123.10.9) 0.397 ms 0.541 ms 0.527 ms 4 0.e1-1.tbr1.tl9.nac.net (209.123.10.102) 1.400 ms 1.481 ms 1.508 ms 5 0.gi-0-0-0.pr1.tl9.nac.net (209.123.11.62) 1.602 ms 1.677 ms 1.699 ms 6 equinix02-iad2.amazon.com (206.223.115.35) 9.393 ms 8.925 ms 8.900 ms 7 72.21.220.41 (72.21.220.41) 32.610 ms 9.812 ms 9.789 ms 8 72.21.222.141 (72.21.222.141) 9.519 ms 9.439 ms 9.443 ms 9 72.21.218.3 (72.21.218.3) 10.245 ms 10.202 ms 10.154 ms 10 * * * 11 * * * 12 * * * 13 * * * 14 * * * 15 * * * 16 * * * 17 * * * 18 * * * 19 * * * 20 * * * 21 * * * 22 * * * 23 * * * 24 * * * 25 * * * 26 * * * 27 * * * 28 * * * 29 * * * 30 * * * The latency looks reasonable, at least until the server stopped responding to ping requests.

  Read the article

• Running docker in VPC and accessing container from another VPC machine

  - by Bogdan Gaza

  I'm having issues while running docker in AWS VPC. Here is my setup: I've got two machines running in VPC: 10.0.100.150 10.0.100.151 both having an elastic IPs assigned to them, both running in the same internet enabled subnet. Let's say I'm running a web server that serves static files in a container on the 10.0.100.150 machine the container: IP: 172.17.0.2 port 8111 is forwarded on the 8111 port on the machine. I'm trying to access the static files from my local machine (or another non-VPC machine also tried an EC2 instance not running in the VPC) and it work flawlessly. If I try to access the files from the other machine (10.0.100.151) it hangs. I'm using wget to pull the files. Tried to debug it with tcpdump and ngrep and that I have seen is that the request reaches the container. If I ngrep on the host machine I see the requests going in but no response going back. If I ngrep on the container I see the requests going in and the response going back. I've tried multiple iptables setups (with postrouting enabled, with manually forwarding ports etc) but no success. Help in any way - even debugging directions would be much appreciated. Thanks!

  Read the article

• CloudFront with Custom Origin and ELB

  - by kmfk

  We are using CloudFront for our static assets but also wanted to allow for Gzip. We set up a new distribution with a custom origin pointing back to our application servers which are behind a elastic load balancer. We manually keep the files in sync across the cluster and update them when we publish. However, with this set up, we get nothing but Miss and RefreshHits from CloudFront, which so far has defeated the purpose. Is there any additional settings in order to use an ELB as your custom origin? In the docs, it references this as a viable solution. It appears when we point the distribution to a single server in our production cluster, cloudfront properly caches our assets. Is it possible that the sticky sessions cookie and the subsequent header that gets added by it could be an issue? Cache-Control: no-cache="set-cookie" //Added by load balancer Any ideas? FYI - currently, we have our custom origin pointing to a single EC2 instance, so caching is working correctly - in case you try to curl the file below. Example headers: curl -I http://static.quick-cdn.com/css/9850999.css HTTP/1.0 200 OK Accept-Ranges: bytes Cache-Control: max-age=3700 Cache-Control: no-cache="set-cookie" Content-Length: 23038 Content-Type: text/css Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 23:03:52 GMT Last-Modified: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 23:00:14 GMT Server: Apache/2.2.17 (Ubuntu) Vary: Accept-Encoding X-Cache: RefreshHit from cloudfront X-Amz-Cf-Id: K_q7Zy3_jdzlEJ85ukELVtdx1GmuXqApAbZZ7G0fPt0mxRMqPKX5pQ==,RzJmPku-rEIO9WlvuSoKa8hiAaR3dLk5KC4cQMWWrf_MDhmjWe8n6A== Via: 1.0 28c34f9fbf559a21ee16594849e4fc9c.cloudfront.net (CloudFront) Connection: close

  Read the article

• Creating Signed URLs for Amazon CloudFront

  - by Zack

  Short version: How do I make signed URLs "on-demand" to mimic Nginx's X-Accel-Redirect behavior (i.e. protecting downloads) with Amazon CloudFront/S3 using Python. I've got a Django server up and running with an Nginx front-end. I've been getting hammered with requests to it and recently had to install it as a Tornado WSGI application to prevent it from crashing in FastCGI mode. Now I'm having an issue with my server getting bogged down (i.e. most of its bandwidth is being used up) due to too many requests for media being made to it, I've been looking into CDNs and I believe Amazon CloudFront/S3 would be the proper solution for me. I've been using Nginx's X-Accel-Redirect header to protect the files from unauthorized downloading, but I don't have that ability with CloudFront/S3--however they do offer signed URLs. I'm no Python expert by far and definitely don't know how to create a Signed URL properly, so I was hoping someone would have a link for how to make these URLs "on-demand" or would be willing to explain how to here, it would be greatly appreciated. Also, is this the proper solution, even? I'm not too familiar with CDNs, is there a CDN that would be better suited for this?

  Read the article

• Amazon S3 and swfaddress

  - by justinbach

  I recently migrated a large AS3 site (lots of swfs, lots of flvs) to Amazon S3. Pretty much everything but HTML and JS files is being stored/served from Amazon, and it's working well. The only problem I'm having is that I built the site using SWFaddress (actually, via the Gaia framework which uses SWFaddress), and for some reason, SWFaddress is no longer updating the address bar correctly as users navigate from page to page. In other words, the URL persistently remains http://www.mysite.com, not http://www.mysite.com/#/section as would be the case were SWFaddress functioning correctly (and as it was functioning prior to the migration). Stranger yet, if I go to (e.g.) http://www.mysite.com/#/section directly, the deeplinking functions as you'd expect--I arrive directly at the correct section. However, navigating away from that section doesn't have any effect on the address bar, despite the fact that it should be dynamically updated. I've got a crossdomain.xml file set up on the site that allows access from all domains, so that's not the issue, and I don't know what else might be. Any ideas would be greatly appreciated! P.S. I integrated S3 by putting pretty much the entire site in an S3 bucket and then just changing the initial swfobject embed to point to the S3 instance of main.swf, passing in the S3 path as the "base" param to the embedded swf so that all dynamically loaded assets and swfs would also be sourced from s3. Dunno if that's related to the troubles I'm having.

  Read the article

• Cloudfront - How to invalidate objects in a distribution that was transformed from secured to public?

  - by Gil

  The setting I have an Amazon Cloudfront distribution that was originally set as secured. Objects in this distribution required a URL signing. For example, a valid URL used to be of the following format: https://d1stsppuecoabc.cloudfront.net/images/TheImage.jpg?Expires=1413119282&Signature=NLLRTVVmzyTEzhm-ugpRymi~nM2v97vxoZV5K9sCd4d7~PhgWINoTUVBElkWehIWqLMIAq0S2HWU9ak5XIwNN9B57mwWlsuOleB~XBN1A-5kzwLr7pSM5UzGn4zn6GRiH-qb2zEoE2Fz9MnD9Zc5nMoh2XXwawMvWG7EYInK1m~X9LXfDvNaOO5iY7xY4HyIS-Q~xYHWUnt0TgcHJ8cE9xrSiwP1qX3B8lEUtMkvVbyLw__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAI7F5R77FFNFWGABC The distribution points to an S3 bucket that also used to be secured (it only allowed access through the cloudfront). What happened At some point, the URL singing expired and would return a 403. Since we no longer need to keep the same security level, I recently changed the setting of the cloudfront distribution and of the S3 bucket it is pointing to, both to be public. I then tried to invalidate objects in this distribution. Invalidation did not throw any errors, however the invalidation did not seem to succeed. Requests to the same cloudfront URL (with or without the query string) still return 403. The response header looks like: HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden Server: CloudFront Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 15:16:08 GMT Content-Type: text/xml Content-Length: 110 Connection: keep-alive X-Cache: Error from cloudfront Via: 1.1 3abf650c7bf73e47515000bddf3f04a0.cloudfront.net (CloudFront) X-Amz-Cf-Id: j1CszSXz0DO-IxFvHWyqkDSdO462LwkfLY0muRDrULU7zT_W4HuZ2B== Things I tried I tried to set another cloudfront distribution that points to the same S3 as origin server. Requests to the same object in the new distribution were successful. The question Did anyone encounter the same situation where a cloudfront URL that returns 403 cannot be invalidated? Is there any reason why wouldn't the object get invalidated? Thanks for your help!

  Read the article

• EC2: is an instance's public DNS stable? Can I rely on it not changing?

  - by Aseem Kishore

  I'm new to Amazon EC2. I've launched my first instance, and am using it as a web server. I see that it has a public DNS (a public URL), e.g.: ec2-123-45-6-789.compute-1.amazonaws.com I can successfully go to this server in my browser, hit it via cURL, etc. I want to use this web server for a back-end service in an app I'm building, so I placed this URL in my app's config, and it works great. But when I manually stop and re-started my instance, I see that the public DNS changes! I've read that this happens when you explicitly stop and re-start, but doesn't happen if you just "reboot". I don't plan on explicitly stopping and re-starting this server ever, but my question is: will this public DNS ever change on its own for any reason? E.g. if the machine abnormally crashes, or whatever. In other words, is it safe to ship an app that's wired to this URL? Thanks!

  Read the article

• Amazon java.lang.VerifyError Android

  - by easycheese

  I have been trying to submit 2 separate apps into the Amazon App store but they keep being rejected. Here is the stack trace for the first: 11-05 11:14:36.488 E/AndroidRuntime(28128): FATAL EXCEPTION: AsyncTask #1 11-05 11:14:36.488 E/AndroidRuntime(28128): java.lang.RuntimeException: An error occured while executing doInBackground() 11-05 11:14:36.488 E/AndroidRuntime(28128): at android.os.AsyncTask$3.done(AsyncTask.java:200) 11-05 11:14:36.488 E/AndroidRuntime(28128): at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerSetException(FutureTask.java:273) 11-05 11:14:36.488 E/AndroidRuntime(28128): at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.setException(FutureTask.java:124) 11-05 11:14:36.488 E/AndroidRuntime(28128): at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:307) 11-05 11:14:36.488 E/AndroidRuntime(28128): at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:137) 11-05 11:14:36.488 E/AndroidRuntime(28128): at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1068) 11-05 11:14:36.488 E/AndroidRuntime(28128): at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:561) 11-05 11:14:36.488 E/AndroidRuntime(28128): at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:1096) 11-05 11:14:36.488 E/AndroidRuntime(28128): Caused by: java.lang.VerifyError: com.companionfree.WLThemeViewer.AmazonClientManager 11-05 11:14:36.488 E/AndroidRuntime(28128): at com.companionfree.WLThemeViewer.UpdateDBs.doInBackground(UpdateDBs.java) 11-05 11:14:36.488 E/AndroidRuntime(28128): at com.companionfree.WLThemeViewer.UpdateDBs.doInBackground(UpdateDBs.java) 11-05 11:14:36.488 E/AndroidRuntime(28128): at android.os.AsyncTask$2.call(AsyncTask.java:185) 11-05 11:14:36.488 E/AndroidRuntime(28128): at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:305) 11-05 11:14:36.488 E/AndroidRuntime(28128): ... 4 more And the relevant logcat for the second 10-12 15:41:48.929 D/dalvikvm( 2451): GC_FOR_MALLOC freed 8099 objects / 524416 bytes in 34ms 10-12 15:41:49.327 I/RPC ( 1563): rx thread timeout (1 clients): 10-12 15:41:49.828 I/RPC ( 1563): rx thread timeout (1 clients): 10-12 15:41:50.089 I/ActivityManager( 1563): Starting activity: Intent { act=android.intent.action.MAIN cat=[android.intent.category.LAUNCHER] flg=0x10200000 cmp=com.companionfree.pushup/.MainScreen } 10-12 15:41:50.099 D/SurfaceFlinger( 1563): Layer::setBuffers(this=0xeafa50), pid=1563, w=1, h=1 10-12 15:41:50.099 D/SurfaceFlinger( 1563): Layer::setBuffers(this=0xeafa50), pid=1563, w=1, h=1 10-12 15:41:50.139 D/SurfaceFlinger( 1563): Layer::requestBuffer(this=0xeafa50), index=0, pid=1563, w=480, h=800 success 10-12 15:41:50.189 I/ActivityManager( 1563): Start proc com.companionfree.pushup for activity com.companionfree.pushup/.MainScreen: pid=2644 uid=10129 gids={1015, 3003} 10-12 15:41:50.319 I/RPC ( 1563): rx thread timeout (1 clients): 10-12 15:41:50.359 W/dalvikvm( 2644): VFY: Lcom/companionfree/pushup/WorkoutDbAdapter; is not instance of Landroid/app/Activity; 10-12 15:41:50.369 W/dalvikvm( 2644): VFY: bad arg 0 (into Landroid/app/Activity;) 10-12 15:41:50.369 W/dalvikvm( 2644): VFY: rejecting call to Lcom/amazon/android/Kiwi;.onActivityResult (Landroid/app/Activity;IILandroid/content/Intent;)Z 10-12 15:41:50.369 W/dalvikvm( 2644): VFY: rejecting opcode 0x71 at 0x0000 10-12 15:41:50.369 W/dalvikvm( 2644): VFY: rejected Lcom/companionfree/pushup/WorkoutDbAdapter;.onActivityResult (IILandroid/content/Intent;)V 10-12 15:41:50.369 W/dalvikvm( 2644): Verifier rejected class Lcom/companionfree/pushup/WorkoutDbAdapter; 10-12 15:41:50.369 D/AndroidRuntime( 2644): Shutting down VM 10-12 15:41:50.369 W/dalvikvm( 2644): threadid=1: thread exiting with uncaught exception (group=0x40025a70) 10-12 15:41:50.369 E/AndroidRuntime( 2644): FATAL EXCEPTION: main 10-12 15:41:50.369 E/AndroidRuntime( 2644): java.lang.VerifyError: com.companionfree.pushup.WorkoutDbAdapter 10-12 15:41:50.369 E/AndroidRuntime( 2644): at com.companionfree.pushup.MainScreen.onCreateMainScreen(MainScreen.java) 10-12 15:41:50.369 E/AndroidRuntime( 2644): at com.companionfree.pushup.MainScreen.onCreate(MainScreen.java) 10-12 15:41:50.369 E/AndroidRuntime( 2644): at android.app.Instrumentation.callActivityOnCreate(Instrumentation.java:1088) 10-12 15:41:50.369 E/AndroidRuntime( 2644): at android.app.ActivityThread.performLaunchActivity(ActivityThread.java:2802) 10-12 15:41:50.369 E/AndroidRuntime( 2644): at android.app.ActivityThread.handleLaunchActivity(ActivityThread.java:2859) 10-12 15:41:50.369 E/AndroidRuntime( 2644): at android.app.ActivityThread.access$2300(ActivityThread.java:136) 10-12 15:41:50.369 E/AndroidRuntime( 2644): at android.app.ActivityThread$H.handleMessage(ActivityThread.java:2179) 10-12 15:41:50.369 E/AndroidRuntime( 2644): at android.os.Handler.dispatchMessage(Handler.java:99) 10-12 15:41:50.369 E/AndroidRuntime( 2644): at android.os.Looper.loop(Looper.java:143) 10-12 15:41:50.369 E/AndroidRuntime( 2644): at android.app.ActivityThread.main(ActivityThread.java:5073) 10-12 15:41:50.369 E/AndroidRuntime( 2644): at java.lang.reflect.Method.invokeNative(Native Method) 10-12 15:41:50.369 E/AndroidRuntime( 2644): at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:521) 10-12 15:41:50.369 E/AndroidRuntime( 2644): at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit$MethodAndArgsCaller.run(ZygoteInit.java:858) 10-12 15:41:50.369 E/AndroidRuntime( 2644): at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit.main(ZygoteInit.java:616) 10-12 15:41:50.369 E/AndroidRuntime( 2644): at dalvik.system.NativeStart.main(Native Method) 10-12 15:41:50.379 W/ActivityManager( 1563): Force finishing activity com.companionfree.pushup/.MainScreen 10-12 15:41:50.399 D/SurfaceFlinger( 1563): Layer::setBuffers(this=0xeff6b8), pid=1563, w=1, h=1 10-12 15:41:50.399 D/SurfaceFlinger( 1563): Layer::setBuffers(this=0xeff6b8), pid=1563, w=1, h=1 10-12 15:41:50.419 D/SurfaceFlinger( 1563): Layer::requestBuffer(this=0xeff6b8), index=0, pid=1563, w=480, h=337 success 10-12 15:41:50.469 D/dalvikvm( 2451): GC_FOR_MALLOC freed 7889 objects / 521072 bytes in 105ms 10-12 15:41:50.819 I/RPC ( 1563): rx thread timeout (1 clients): I see the same verify error on both but I can't figure it out. The only common library used between the 2 apps is the FlurryAgent.jar for analytics. For the top app I have For the bottom app I have in the manifests. The only information I have been able to find out is about libraries (GSON) and needing to use dx but I am using Eclipse so that doesn't help. To make this more difficult, the error does NOT occur on the Android Market. Yet the testers at Amazon say that it FC 5/5 times on each of their devices (I tried using an emulator for their test devices and they worked fine). I know they use "wrapper" code around my app and I think it must be interfering in some way. Does anyone have any experience with this?

  Read the article

• EC2 instances keep becoming inaccessible via SSH, can I use elastic loadbalancer to check SSH connectivity?

  - by Rick

  This is mainly an issue for my development ec2 server as it seems that my instance keeps becoming inaccessible via SSH. It happened yesterday so I killed that one and started a new one and happened again later today. The server still works, my web application is accessible in a web browser but whenever I try to connect via SSH I get a pemrission denied (public key) error message in my terminal. I am 100% sure I am doing nothing wrong as I can create a new instance of the exact same AMI (its a personal custom AMI), change absolutely nothing, including using the same .pem key, and then am able to SSH into that new instance using the exact same command as before (just changing the IP address). I understand that ec2 can have issues but having this happen every day seems a bit odd.. I am using an m2.xlarge instance so I don't know if these tend to be unstable, in the past I have used a small instance and had it running for months with no problems which is why I find this so odd. I am looking into using loadbalancing but it seems the only "health" checks they offer is for http or tcp so I'm not sure if I can make it monitor for SSH connectivity. This is important for development as I may make 1-2 new pushes of an application a day and use SSH to do this. I have a designer that needs to have the app always accessible as he works with the front-end files to test output with the live application. Anyways, any advice / info is appreciated

  Read the article

• How to determine if my AWS/EC2 server has been compromised / resolution?

  - by ElHaix

  I have recently seen an increase in network in/out activity on my server and am trying to determine if my AWS/EC2 instance has been compromised, and if so, how to resolve? In my security group I have: Inbound: 80 (HTTP) 0.0.0.0/0 Outbound: 80 (HTTP) 0.0.0.0/0 443 (HTTPS) 0.0.0.0/0 Using TCP-UDP Endpoint Viewer: I see a lot of w3wp.exe TCP processes with varying local ports http and numbered, as well as varying remote ports. Some processes go red/yellow/green on updates . I see Remote address for most w3wp processes are my ec2 instance, however I am seeing several to *.deploy.akamaitechnologies.com and *.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com with received bytes varying between 4-11 megs. I also see Ec2Config.exe, remote address: 169.254.169.254 System Process Remote Address: fetcher4-4.p.mail.ru (how can I get rid of this one?!) local port: http remote port: 33432 I am also seeing some system processes from 114.216-244-93-rdns.wowrack.com: Protocol: TCP local port: http remote port: varying As well as some baiduspider "System Process"'s. I'm afraid that my system may have been compromised, and wondering if these results are any indication of that. If so, how can I get eliminate these possible threats? I have MS Security Essentials installed.

  Read the article

• SQL queries break our game! (Back-end server is at capacity)

  - by TimH

  We have a Facebook game that stores all persistent data in a MySQL database that is running on a large Amazon RDS instance. One of our tables is 2GB in size. If I run any queries on that table that take more than a couple of seconds, any SQL actions performed by our game will fail with the error: HTTP/1.1 503 Service Unavailable: Back-end server is at capacity This obviously brings down our game! I've monitored CPU usage on the RDS instance during these periods, and though it does spike, it doesn't go much over 50%. Previously we were on a smaller instance size and it did hit 100%, so I'd hoped just throwing more CPU capacity at the problem would solve it. I now think it's an issue with the number of open connections. However, I've only been working with SQL for 8 months or so, so I'm no expert on MySQL configuration. Is there perhaps some configuration setting I can change to prevent these queries from overloading the server, or should I just not be running them whilst our game is up? I'm using MySQL Workbench to run the queries. Here's an example.... SELECT * FROM BlueBoxEngineDB.Transfer WHERE Amount = 1000 AND FromUserId = 4 AND Status='Complete'; As you can see, it's not overly complex. There are only 5 columns in the table. Any help would be very much appreciated - Thanks!

  Read the article

• Help - since adding an elastic load balancer to my EC2 web application I cannot connect with the MySQL database (not in AWS)

  - by undefined

  I have a web application that uses an EC2 instance to receive uploaded images, resize and store on S3 and update my MySQL database with the image record. This database is hosted outside Amazon Web Services and so obviously involves communication between the EC2 instance and the database. Images are posted to the upload server from a Flash client which receives the IP address of the upload server when it is loaded and so sends images to 1.12.23.34/resize_script.php This has worked great .. until i started to try and include a load balancer. Since the ELBs do not use an IP address but a DNS address I am now passing this to Flash. Now when I upload images I get the following response from the server - Could not connect to MySQL: Lost connection to MySQL server at 'reading initial communication packet', system error: 111 What might be causing the lost connection to MySQL server. Is there any additional steps I need to take to allow my upload servers to be load balanced? I have set the host property of my MySQL privileges for this user to % any pointers greatly appreciated thanks.

  Read the article

• Alternative to Amazon’s S3 service?

  - by Cory

  Just wondering if there is good alternative to Amazon's S3 service? I like S3 but the bandwidth cost is high. I looked at CouldFiles from Rackspace but the cost is even higher. I don't mind prepaying or having monthly payment in order to reduce the bandwidth cost greatly. Thank you for any help

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40  | Next Page >