Search Results

Search found 20087 results on 804 pages for 'css3 multiple backgrounds'.

Page 33/804 | < Previous Page | 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40  | Next Page >

  • Why does filter: blur(0) still cause text to blur under Webkit?

    - by johnkavanagh
    I've come across a bug today that's taken far longer than I would like to admit to identify. Essentially: setting a filter: blur(0) (or the vendor-specific -webkit-filter) on an element should - I believe - mean that no form of blur is applied. However, having tested this today, it would appear that Webkit based browsers still blur the text within any element with either blur(0) or blur(0px) assigned to it. I've knocked together a quick Fiddle here: http://jsfiddle.net/f9rBE/ These are three identical dixs containing text (no custom fonts): This has absolutely nothing assigned Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Aliquam facilisis orci in quam venenatis, in tempus ipsum sagittis. Suspendisse potenti. Donec ullamcorper lacus vel odio accumsan, vel aliquam libero tempor. Praesent nec libero venenatis, ultrices arcu non, luctus quam. Morbi scelerisque sit amet turpis sit amet tincidunt. Praesent semper erat non purus pretium consequat. Aenean et iaculis turpis. Curabitur diam tellus, consectetur non massa et, commodo venenatis metus. One has no styles at all assigned, the other two have blur(0) and blur(0px): .no-blur{} .zero-px-blur{ -webkit-filter: blur(0px); -moz-filter: blur(0px); -o-filter: blur(0px); -ms-filter: blur(0px); filter: blur(0px); } .zero-blur{ -webkit-filter: blur(0); -moz-filter: blur(0); -o-filter: blur(0); -ms-filter: blur(0); filter: blur(0); } If you preview this under Chrome/Safari you'll see that the text in the second two are still blurred: A few things worth noting: This unintentional blurring occurs in Safari on iOS7 devices (both iPhones and iPads); It also occurs on Chrome and Safari under OSX; It doesn't happen under FireFox in OSX. Of course, this isn't supported at all in Firefox just yet so it's hard to tell whether the behaviour I'm seeing is intentional/expected behaviour, or whether this is a bug in Webkit? Is it possible that this is only prevalent in higher-density resolution devices (ie: retina MacBook/iPhone/iPad)? With this in mind, how do you actually overwrite an item that has blur applied to it to set it back to non-blurred?

    Read the article

  • Will html5 change everything for designers?

    - by Sean Thompson
    What impact do you think html5 will have on the workflow/way graphic design is done for the web? Right now most designers stay in an Adobe tool, doing most of the design work there, and implement some elements with graphics and some with code. Checking out http://www.apple.com/html5/ it seems that almost everything done in a graphic can be done in code. Will designers have to learn very advanced levels of html5 and do the actual design work in the browser or do you see a more "designer friendly" gui being made for html/graphics work? Will tools like photoshop evolve in a way that handles this new lack of image files?

    Read the article

  • Why don't web fonts in Firefox work on a different domain?

    - by mikez302
    I was experimenting with the fancy new OpenType font capability in Firefox 3.5 and I ran into a problem. I was trying to embed a font on a different domain than the page it would be used on, and it didn't work. I thought it may have been a bug, but from what I read on the MDC reference page, I noticed this note: In Gecko, web fonts are subject to the same domain restriction (font files must be on the same domain as the page using them), unless HTTP access controls are used to relax this restriction. It looks like they designed the browser that way on purpose. Out of curiosity, why would they do that? Is there any security risk with embedding a font? Or is it for legal trademark or copyright issues? Or something else?

    Read the article

  • CSS - Class hierarchies???

    - by ClarkeyBoy
    Hi, I have a site with a customer front end, which has a catalogue, homepage, contact page, about us page and so on. There is also an administration front end. I would like to implement a kind of hierarchy where any elements within an element with class "admin" will inherit properties set in the admin stylesheet and anything else inherits from the customer stylesheet. The purpose of this is so that admin can login on the admin front end, where they have access to lots of advanced stuff, but they can also navigate to the customer front end where they can execute basic tasks (such as hiding catalogue items, running a debug script if a customer reports an issue and so on). I would like all the admin tools on the customer front end to have properties taken from the admin stylesheet instead of the customer one - this will change the background colour and stuff. Is there any easy way to set up like namespaces to make things simpler, for example: .admin { .list { .list-subtitle { } .list-item { } } a { } } .customer { .list { .list-subtitle { } .list-item { } } a { } } I know it can be like: .admin .list {} .admin .list .list-item {} .admin a I just dont want to have to keep putting .admin all the time. Does anyone have any suggestions on how I could do this? I suppose I could write a .net class which sets this up and writes a stylesheet according to whats put into it, but then I would not be able to read the styles so easily add there would be all sorts of like Classes.Add(blah) and so on. Thanks in advance for any replies... Regards, Richard

    Read the article

  • webkit translateX animation is rolling back to initial position

    - by Cedric Dugas
    I am trying to do a images gallery for mobile webkit, The only way it is actually fast enough is using the hardware accelerated translateX . My problem is that the div take back its initial position at the end of the animation. I add the slideGalLeft class cliking on the left button. to the animated div You can see an example here, in the callback events section: http://position-absolute.com/jqtouch/demos/main/#home .slideGalLeft { -webkit-animation-name: slideColis; } @-webkit-keyframes slideColis { from { -webkit-transform: translateX(0%); } to { -webkit-transform: translateX(-100%); } }

    Read the article

  • -moz-linear-gradient

    - by bah
    Hi, Could someone explain to me what this portion of code means? repeat scroll 0 0 #F6F6F6; I have googled a lot and only found syntax to this part -moz-linear-gradient(center top , #FFFFFF, #EFEFEF) My code: background: -moz-linear-gradient(center top , #FFFFFF, #EFEFEF) repeat scroll 0 0 #F6F6F6; Thanks!

    Read the article

  • CSS size transition to stay inside parent div

    - by IlyaD
    I want to have an image frame that when I hove over it the image inside will zoom in a little (I am using size transition), but the frame will stay the same size. What happens now that even if the frame has a fixed width and height it is stilled zoomed with the image HTML: <div class="img-wrapper"> <img class="thumbnail" src="http://placekitten.com/400/200"> </div> and CSS .img-wrapper { width: 400px; } .thumbnail { width: 400px; } .thumbnail { -webkit-transition: all 0.2s ease-out; -moz-transition: all 0.2s ease-out; transition: all 0.2s ease-out; } .thumbnail:hover { width: 500px; -webkit-transition: all 0.2s ease-out; -moz-transition: all 0.2s ease-out; transition: all 0.2s ease-out; } http://codepen.io/pen/KCJny

    Read the article

  • Transitioning accordions from small height to full height with CSS

    - by arkanciscan
    I am building an accordion list and I want it to animate open and closed using a CSS -webkit-transition:. The animation is triggered by an event handler that simply toggles the .open class on and off. The problem is that when I click it, the animation goes from closed height to 0px height then jerks back to full height instead of smoothly animating to full height. HTML <ul class="accordion"> <li>Foo <p>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nunc quis leo sit amet justo vulputate volutpat. Suspendisse potenti. Aliquam aliquet justo ut turpis suscipit adipiscing.</p> </li> <li class="open">Baz <p>Ut velit magna, sagittis at blandit accumsan, vestibulum et dolor. Aliquam elit ante, congue vel pharetra ut, ultricies non est. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Donec velit ligula, sodales a imperdiet non, sagittis id mauris.</p> </li> <li>Bar <p>Cras sit amet gravida lacus. Nulla consequat molestie nunc nec fermentum. Donec lobortis pretium quam sit amet scelerisque.</p> </li> </ul>? Javascript $('.accordion').delegate('li', 'click', function(li){ $(this).toggleClass('open'); }); Css .accordion li.open{ -webkit-transition: height 1s; } .accordion li:not(.open){ height: 1em; -webkit-transition: height 1s; } ? Try it on JSFiddle and see what I mean. I've already figured out how to make it work, but it requires setting an explicit height on the .open class. The accordions have variable height however, and creating an explicit selector for each one is obtrusive and unmaintainable. Can anyone give me a better solution than this? Here it is working with an explicit height that doesn't fit the content

    Read the article

  • Progressive Enhancement with box-shadow

    - by toby
    I would like to use WebKit's box-shadow css property for a little drop-down. The code would look like: .drop_down{ -webkit-box-shadow: 1px 1px 4px #888; box-shadow: 1px 1px 4px #888; } However, for browsers that do not have this capability, I would like to use borders to approximate this drop shadow, like so: .drop_down{ border-top: 1px solid #bbb; border-left: 1px solid #bbb; border-right: 2px solid #bbb; border-bottom: 2px solid #bbb; } The problem is, I don't want the border-based shadow to show up for the browsers that DO support box-shadow. I would like to avoid browser sniffing because I assume it's hard to cover all the cases. What is the simplest way to do this? I prefer a javascript-less solution, but I will consider simple javascript-based ones too.

    Read the article

  • Firefox radial gradient issue

    - by Tural Teyyuboglu
    Trying to set radial gradient to the bg. The problem is, all other browsers shows gradient, on Firefox doesn't. What's wrong? Generated this code on this website http://www.colorzilla.com/gradient-editor/ (with ie9 support) background: rgb(255,255,255); background: url(); background: -moz-radial-gradient(center, ellipse cover, rgba(255,255,255,1) 0%, rgba(234,234,234,1) 100%); background: -webkit-gradient(radial, center center, 0px, center center, 100%, color-stop(0%,rgba(255,255,255,1)), color-stop(100%,rgba(234,234,234,1))); background: -webkit-radial-gradient(center, ellipse cover, rgba(255,255,255,1) 0%,rgba(234,234,234,1) 100%); background: -o-radial-gradient(center, ellipse cover, rgba(255,255,255,1) 0%,rgba(234,234,234,1) 100%); background: -ms-radial-gradient(center, ellipse cover, rgba(255,255,255,1) 0%,rgba(234,234,234,1) 100%); background: radial-gradient(center, ellipse cover, rgba(255,255,255,1) 0%,rgba(234,234,234,1) 100%); filter: progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.gradient( startColorstr='#ffffff', endColorstr='#eaeaea',GradientType=1 );

    Read the article

  • Curved corners in the IE's... CSS 3? Conditionals? Images? JS?

    - by Smickie
    Curved corners in the IE's... I'm using a CSS 3 border-radus class called .curved on all my things I want with cool curved corners. The new CSS works in all the normal browsers, however IE is being a right dips**t. Whats the best practice for adding rounded corners nowadays. Shell I target anything with .curved in JS and do it all in jquery? Use some messy conditional tags. Or just give it a few years and not use CSS 3?

    Read the article

  • CSS 3 - Scaling CSS Transitions

    - by Viv Shc
    I am trying to scale an image when you mouseenter, which is working. I would like the image to gradually scale up with an ease transition. I used ease-in-out, which it's not working. Any suggestions? Also, I used addClass & removeClass twice in the jquery code. Is there a way to only use it once? Thanks! <style> .image { opacity: 0.5; } .image.opaque { opacity: 1; } .size{ transform:scale(1.2); -ms-transform:scale(1.2); /* IE 9 */ -webkit-transform:scale(1.2); /* Safari and Chrome */ -webkit-transition: scale 2s ease-in-out; -moz-transition: scale 2s ease-in-out; -o-transition: scale 2s ease-in-out; -ms-transition: scale 2s ease-in-out; transition: scale 2s ease-in-out; transition: opacity 2s; } </style> <script> $(document).ready(function() { $(".image").mouseenter(function() { $(this).addClass("opaque"); $(this).addClass("size"); }); $(".image").mouseleave(function() { $(this).removeClass("opaque"); $(this).removeClass("size"); }); }); <div id="gallery"> <h3>Gallery of images</h3> <img class="image" src="images/gnu.jpg" height="200px" width="250px"> <img class="image" src="images/tiger.jpg" height="200px" width="250px"> <img class="image" src="images/black_rhino.jpg" height="200px" width="250px"> <img class="image" src="images/cape_buffalo.jpg" height="200px" width="250px"> </div>

    Read the article

  • Why CSS Transitions -module does not support image-to-image transitions?

    - by Kai Sellgren
    Hi, I've read the spec for CSS Transitions Module Level 3 and I'd like to know why it does not support image-based transitions. According to the draft, the background-image transitions are only supported when using with gradients. Both Webkit and Gecko seems to follow this practice. It's just that I see this as a major drawback. HTML 5 and CSS 3 could become the killer of Flash, but if I can't even transit between two images, I don't see how one could have beautiful menus without Flash.

    Read the article

  • How to make transition effect on css sprite hover

    - by MonsterMMORPG
    Here part of my css sprite code #IconSet a { width: 36px; height: 36px; display: inline-block; } #DeviantArtIcon { border-width: 0px; border-style: none; background-image: url(http://static.monstermmorpg.com/images/csssprites/SocialIcons.png); background-color: transparent; background-repeat: repeat-x; background-position: -144px -0px; width: 36px; height: 36px; } #DeviantArtIcon:hover { border-width: 0px; border-style: none; background-image: url(http://static.monstermmorpg.com/images/csssprites/SocialIcons.png); background-color: transparent; background-repeat: repeat-x; background-position: -144px -36px; width: 36px; height: 36px; } <a id="DeviantArtIcon" href="http://monstermmorpg.deviantart.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" title="Monster MMORPG On Deviant Art - Please Watch Our Channel"></a> Now when this icon hovered i want to have transition effect. How can i do that ? I tried here but no luck CSS Fade Between Background Images on Hover

    Read the article

  • Conditionally styling @font-face

    - by Gnee
    I'm using @font-face for some headers. The replaced typeface is different in dimension and overall character. When the switch happens, the old typeface's rules don't look so good. Other than writing a conditional Javascript script, is there a way to have a set of CSS rules for @font-face fonts (if the browsers supports it) and CSS rules for the unreplaced default fonts?

    Read the article

  • How do i make my text wrap in a <div> with a large border radius

    - by Greg Guida
    in the following code <html> <body> <div style="height:400px; width:400px; -moz-border-radius:100px; -webkit-border-radius:100px; border:3px solid #500; background-color:#a00; overflow:hidden;"> Why is this getting cut at the beginning??? </div> </body> </html> Why isn't the browser wrapping the text around the rounded corners. In webkit browsers(i tested both chrome and safari) the overflow hidden cuts the text outside the border. Firefox just renders text outside the border. I also tried this without overflow:hidden; but again the text just rendered outside the border.

    Read the article

  • Animate opacity and delay transition CSS

    - by user1876246
    I have a series of DIVS, I want DIV 1 & DIV 3 to fade out and then DIV 2 and DIV 4 to slide left to take their place, 1 second after the fade. So far I have gotten them to fade out but I cannot figure out how to delay the sliding. Follows is my CSS, ignore the lack of vendor prefixes for this question please. .slide-show{ -webkit-animation: fadeShow 0.25s 1 normal forwards ease-out; animation: fadeShow 0.25s 1 normal forwards ease-out; visibility: visible; } .slide-hide{ -webkit-animation: fadeHide 0.25s 1 normal forwards ease-out; animation: fadeHide 0.25s 1 normal forwards ease-out; //I need the following to be delayed for 1 second visibility: hidden; position: absolute; } @keyframes fadeHide{ 0% { opacity: 1; } 100% { opacity: 0; } } @keyframes fadeShow{ 0% { opacity: 0; } 100% { opacity: 1; } }

    Read the article

  • Somewhere to download CSS coverflow?

    - by Mark
    This is my favorite coverflow: http://paulbakaus.com/lab/js/coverflow/ Is there some way to download this? Or is there an implementation guide? All I see are some blog posts with nothing on how to implement. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • css absolute position won't work with margin-left:auto margin-right: auto

    - by user1118019
    Say you have the following css applied to a div tag .divtagABS { position: absolute; margin-left: auto; margin-right:auto; } the margin-left and margin-right does not take effect but if you have relative, it works fine i.e. ,divtagREL { position: relative; margin-left: auto; margin-right:auto; } why is that? i just want to center an element can someone explain why setting margins to auto in absolute position does not work?

    Read the article

  • Diagonal Wedge Shaped CSS - Edge to Edge Centered in Browser

    - by Varazi
    I have been trying to make this shape in CSS. Ideally it will span the entire length of the browser window and probably extend outside the field of view to support larger screens and also be centered so that the angle does not change. Anyone have any solutions? Also I think I might run into a problem of the angle aliasing harshly. I might need to resort to using an image. Would like to use CSS though. ** Image Spelling Error. (Indefinitely not Inevitably)

    Read the article

  • Why don't web fonts in Firefox don't work on a different domain?

    - by mikez302
    I was experimenting with the fancy new OpenType font capability in Firefox 3.5 and I ran into a problem. I was trying to embed a font on a different domain than the page it would be used on, and it didn't work. I thought it may have been a bug, but from what I read on the MDC reference page, I noticed this note: In Gecko, web fonts are subject to the same domain restriction (font files must be on the same domain as the page using them), unless HTTP access controls are used to relax this restriction. It looks like they designed the browser that way on purpose. Out of curiosity, why would they do that? Is there any security risk with embedding a font? Or is it for legal trademark or copyright issues? Or something else?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40  | Next Page >