Search Results

Search found 56333 results on 2254 pages for 'set cookie'.

Page 330/2254 | < Previous Page | 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337  | Next Page >

  • Nhibernate Migration from 1.0.2.0 to 2.1.2 and many-to-one save problems

    - by Meska
    Hi, we have an old, big asp.net application with nhibernate, which we are extending and upgrading some parts of it. NHibernate that was used was pretty old ( 1.0.2.0), so we decided to upgrade to ( 2.1.2) for the new features. HBM files are generated through custom template with MyGeneration. Everything went quite smoothly, except for one thing. Lets say we have to objects Blog and Post. Blog can have many posts, so Post will have many-to-one relationship. Due to the way that this application operates, relationship is done not through primary keys, but through Blog.Reference column. Sample mapings and .cs files: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?> <id name="Id" column="Id" type="Guid"> <generator class="assigned"/> </id> <property column="Reference" type="Int32" name="Reference" not-null="true" /> <property column="Name" type="String" name="Name" length="250" /> </class> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?> <id name="Id" column="Id" type="Guid"> <generator class="assigned"/> </id> <property column="Reference" type="Int32" name="Reference" not-null="true" /> <property column="Name" type="String" name="Name" length="250" /> <many-to-one name="Blog" column="BlogId" class="SampleNamespace.BlogEntity,SampleNamespace" property-ref="Reference" /> </class> And class files class BlogEntity { public Guid Id { get; set; } public int Reference { get; set; } public string Name { get; set; } } class PostEntity { public Guid Id { get; set; } public int Reference { get; set; } public string Name { get; set; } public BlogEntity Blog { get; set; } } Now lets say that i have a Blog with Id 1D270C7B-090D-47E2-8CC5-A3D145838D9C and with Reference 1 In old nhibernate such thing was possible: //this Blog already exists in database BlogEntity blog = new BlogEntity(); blog.Id = Guid.Empty; blog.Reference = 1; //Reference is unique, so we can distinguish Blog by this field blog.Name = "My blog"; //this is new Post, that we are trying to insert PostEntity post = new PostEntity(); post.Id = Guid.NewGuid(); post.Name = "New post"; post.Reference = 1234; post.Blog = blog; session.Save(post); However, in new version, i get an exception that cannot insert NULL into Post.BlogId. As i understand, in old version, for nhibernate it was enough to have Blog.Reference field, and it could retrieve entity by that field, and attach it to PostEntity, and when saving PostEntity, everything would work correctly. And as i understand, new NHibernate tries only to retrieve by Blog.Id. How to solve this? I cannot change DB design, nor can i assign an Id to BlogEntity, as objects are out of my control (they come prefilled as generic "ojbects" like this from external source)

    Read the article

  • List of models in Model in MVC

    - by arri
    I have two models: class ModelIn{ public string FirstName { get; set; } public string LastName { get; set; } public string Address { get; set; } } class ModelOut{ public ModelOut(){ People = new List<ModelIn>();} public List<ModelIn> People { get; private set;} public string Country { get; set; } } And I have Controller editing ModelOut: public ActionResult People() { ... return View(SomeModelOutInstanceWith3People); } [HttpPost] public ActionResult(ModelOut m) { ... } In view I have sth like: <% using (Html.BeginForm()) { %> <%: Html.EditorFor(m => Model.Country) %> <% for(int i = 0; i < Model.People.Count; ++i){ %> <%: Html.EditorFor(m => Model.People[i].FirstName) %> <%: Html.EditorFor(m => Model.People[i].LastName) %> <%: Html.EditorFor(m => Model.People[i].Address) %> <% } %> <input type="submit" /> <% } %> It works all OK, but in post action I have empty ModelOut m. I can see in logs that data is sent correctly. I have tried everything, nothing works.

    Read the article

  • Pass Linq Expression to a function

    - by Kushan Hasithe Fernando
    I want to pass a property list of a class to a function. with in the function based on property list I'm going to generate a query. As exactly same functionality in Linq Select method. Here I'm gonna implement this for Ingress Database. As an example, in front end I wanna run a select as this, My Entity Class is like this public class Customer { [System.Data.Linq.Mapping.ColumnAttribute(Name="Id",IsPrimaryKey=true)] public string Id { get; set; } [System.Data.Linq.Mapping.ColumnAttribute(Name = "Name")] public string Name { get; set; } [System.Data.Linq.Mapping.ColumnAttribute(Name = "Address")] public string Address { get; set; } [System.Data.Linq.Mapping.ColumnAttribute(Name = "Email")] public string Email { get; set; } [System.Data.Linq.Mapping.ColumnAttribute(Name = "Mobile")] public string Mobile { get; set; } } I wanna call a Select function like this, var result = dataAccessService.Select<Customer>(C=>C.Name,C.Address); then,using result I can get the Name and Address properties' values. I think my Select function should looks like this, ( *I think this should done using Linq Expression. But im not sure what are the input parameter and return type. * ) Class DataAccessService { // I'm not sure about this return type and input types, generic types. public TResult Select<TSource,TResult>(Expression<Func<TSource,TResult>> selector) { // Here using the property list, // I can get the ColumnAttribute name value and I can generate a select query. } } This is a attempt to create a functionality like in Linq. But im not an expert in Linq Expressions. There is a project call DbLinq from MIT, but its a big project and still i couldn't grab anything helpful from that. Can someone please help me to start this, or can someone link me some useful resources to read about this.

    Read the article

  • Gamepad Control for Processing + Android to Control Arduino Robot

    - by Iker
    I would like to create a Multitouch Gamepad control for Processing and use it to control a remote Arduino Robot. I would like to make the GUI on Processing and compile it for Android. Here is the GUI Gamepad for Processing I have created so far: float easing = 0.09; // start position int posX = 50; int posY = 200; // target position int targetX = 50; int targetY = 200; boolean dragging = false; void setup() { size(500,250); smooth(); } void draw() { background(255); if (!dragging) { // calculate the difference in position, apply easing and add to vx/vy float vx = (targetX - (posX)) * easing; float vy = (targetY - (posY)) * easing; // Add the velocity to the current position: make it move! posX += vx; posY += vy; } if(mousePressed) { dragging = true; posX = mouseX; posY = mouseY; } else { dragging = false; } DrawGamepad(); DrawButtons(); } void DrawGamepad() { //fill(0,155,155); //rect(0, 150, 100, 100, 15); ellipseMode(RADIUS); // Set ellipseMode to RADIUS fill(0,155,155); // Set fill to blue ellipse(50, 200, 50, 50); // Draw white ellipse using RADIUS mode ellipseMode(CENTER); // Set ellipseMode to CENTER fill(255); // Set fill to white// ellipse(posX, posY, 35, 35); // Draw gray ellipse using CENTER mode } void DrawButtons() { fill(0,155,155); // Set fill to blue ellipse(425, 225, 35, 35); ellipse(475, 225, 35, 35); fill(255,0,0); // Set fill to blue ellipse(425, 175, 35, 35); ellipse(475, 175, 35, 35); } I have realized that probably that code will not support Multitouch events on Android so I came up with another code found on this link Can Processing handle multi-touch? So the aim of this project is to create de multitouch gamepad to use to control my Arduino Robot. The gamepad should detect which key was pressed as well as the direction of the Joystick. Any help appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Exposing a service to external systems - How should I design the contract?

    - by Larsi
    Hi! I know this question is been asked before here but still I'm not sure what to select. My service will be called from many 3 party system in the enterprise. I'm almost sure the information the service will collect (MyBigClassWithAllInfo) will change during the products lifetime. Is it still a good idea to expose objects? This is basically what my two alternatives: [ServiceContract] public interface ICollectStuffService { [OperationContract] SetDataResponseMsg SetData(SetDataRequestMsg dataRequestMsg); } // Alternative 1: Put all data inside a xml file [DataContract] public class SetDataRequestMsg { [DataMember] public string Body { get; set; } [DataMember] public string OtherPropertiesThatMightBeHandy { get; set; } // ?? } // Alternative 2: Expose the objects [DataContract] public class SetDataRequestMsg { [DataMember] public Header Header { get; set; } [DataMember] public MyBigClassWithAllInfo ExposedObject { get; set; } } public class SetDataResponseMsg { [DataMember] public ServiceError Error { get; set; } } The xml file would look like this: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <Message>   <Header>     <InfoAboutTheSender>...</InfoAboutTheSender>   </Header>   <StuffToCollectWithAllTheInfo>   <stuff1>...</stuff1> </StuffToCollectWithAllTheInfo> </Message> Any thought on how this service should be implemented? Thanks Larsi

    Read the article

  • UIScrollView eating touches from its parent

    - by Jon Hull
    I have nested scrollViews (or rather a subclass of UIScrollView inside of an actual scrollview). I set the size of the inner view to its contentSize and set scrollEnabled = NO, because I only want the outside view scrolling. But the innerView occasionally eats touches and keeps the outerView from scrolling when it should. Is there something else I need to set to keep it from stealing the scrolling touches, but still allowing user interaction (e.g. editing a textView)?

    Read the article

  • Nhibernate beginner - asking for directions

    - by George
    Hello guys. I'm starting off with NHibernate now and I still don't have a testable environment. I would like to know from you, experienced fellows if there is a problem to map IList to an Set in .hbm file. Like this: //c# IList<TrechoItem> trechos_item; <!-- xml .hbm --> <set name="TrechosItem" table="trecho_item" lazy="true" inverse="true" fetch="select"> <key column="id_item"/> <one-to-many class="TrechoItem"/> </set> Or, in this: IList<Autor> Autores; <set name="Autores" lazy="true" table="item_possui_autor"> <key column="id_item"/> <many-to-many class="Autor" column="id_autor"/> </set> Is this possible? Or am I doing the wrong thing? I tried using and but these did not gave me all the options in . Thanks in advanced

    Read the article

  • asp:SqlDataSource binded to asp:DropDownList

    - by _simon_
    I have a asp:SqlDataSource and asp:DropDownList components on my page. On normal page it works ok. Now I'd like to put this on new page with url like ...mypage.aspx?transactionID=2. In Page_Load I would like to set Transaction drop down selected index to 2. But it always binds to 1. I assume, that things happen in this order: in Page_Load I set selected index to 2. Then asp:SqlDataSource's select statement executes and binds to DropDownList. That's why selected index of my DropDownList is always 1, no matter what I set it in Page_Load. So, how can I bind asp:SqlDataSource to asp:DropDownList and also set it's selected index parameter to some integer?

    Read the article

  • Using Excel VBA to Create SQL Tables

    - by user307655
    Hi All, I am trying to use Excel VBA to automate the creation of a SQL table in an existing SQL Database. I have come across the following code on this side. Private Sub CreateDatabaseFromExcel() Dim dbConnectStr As String Dim Catalog As Object Dim cnt As ADODB.Connection Dim dbPath As String Dim tblName As String 'Set database name in the Excel Sheet dbPath = ActiveSheet.Range("B1").Value 'Database Name tblName = ActiveSheet.Range("B2").Value 'Table Name dbConnectStr = "Provider=Microsoft.Jet.OLEDB.4.0;Data Source=" & dbPath & ";" 'Create new database using name entered in Excel Cell ("B1") Set Catalog = CreateObject("ADOX.Catalog") Catalog.Create dbConnectStr Set Catalog = Nothing 'Connect to database and insert a new table Set cnt = New ADODB.Connection With cnt .Open dbConnectStr .Execute "CREATE TABLE tblName ([BankName] text(50) WITH Compression, " & _ "[RTNumber] text(9) WITH Compression, " & _ "[AccountNumber] text(10) WITH Compression, " & _ "[Address] text(150) WITH Compression, " & _ "[City] text(50) WITH Compression, " & _ "[ProvinceState] text(2) WITH Compression, " & _ "[Postal] text(6) WITH Compression, " & _ "[AccountAmount] decimal(6))" End With Set cnt = Nothing End Sub However i can't successfully get it to work? What I am trying to do is actually use Excel to create a table not a database? The database already exists. I would just like to create a new table. The name of the table will be referenced from cell A1 in Sheet 1. Can somebody please help. Thanks Regards Gerard

    Read the article

  • Why does firefox round-trip to the server to determine whether my files are modifed?

    - by erikkallen
    I have some static content on my web site that I have set up caching for (using Asp.NET MVC). According to Firebug, the first time I open the page, Firefox sends this request: GET /CoreContent/Core.css?asm=0.7.3614.34951 Host: 127.0.0.1:3916 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox/3.5.5 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729) Accept: text/css,*/*;q=0.1 Accept-Language: en-us,en;q=0.5 Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7 Keep-Alive: 300 Connection: keep-alive Referer: http://127.0.0.1:3916/Edit/1/101 Cookie: .ASPXAUTH=52312E5A802C1A079E2BA29AA2BFBC5A38058977B84452D62ED52855D4164659B4307661EC73A307BFFB2ED3871C67CB3A9AAFDB3A75A99AC0A21C63A6AADE9A11A7138C672E75125D9FF3EFFBD9BF62 Pragma: no-cache Cache-Control: no-cache Which my server replies to with this: Server: ASP.NET Development Server/9.0.0.0 Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:44:41 GMT X-AspNet-Version: 2.0.50727 X-AspNetMvc-Version: 1.0 Cache-Control: public, max-age=31535671 Expires: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 18:39:12 GMT Last-Modified: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:39:12 GMT Vary: * Content-Type: text/css Content-Length: 15006 Connection: Close So far, so good. However, if I refresh Firefox (not a cache-clearing refresh, just a normal one), during that refresh cycle Firefox will once again go to the server with this request: GET /CoreContent/Core.css?asm=0.7.3614.34951 Host: 127.0.0.1:3916 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox/3.5.5 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729) Accept: text/css,*/*;q=0.1 Accept-Language: en-us,en;q=0.5 Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7 Keep-Alive: 300 Connection: keep-alive Referer: http://127.0.0.1:3916/Edit/1/101 Cookie: .ASPXAUTH=52312E5A802C1A079E2BA29AA2BFBC5A38058977B84452D62ED52855D4164659B4307661EC73A307BFFB2ED3871C67CB3A9AAFDB3A75A99AC0A21C63A6AADE9A11A7138C672E75125D9FF3EFFBD9BF62 If-Modified-Since: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:39:20 GMT Cache-Control: max-age=0 to which my server responds 304 Not Modified. Why does Firefox issue this second request? In the first response, I said that the cache does not expire for a year (I intend to use query parameters whenever things change). Do I have to add another response header to prevent this extra roundtrip? Edit: It does not matter whether I press refresh, or whether I go to the page again (or a different URL, which references the same external files). Firefox does the same again. Also, I don't claim this to be a bug in FF, I just wonder if there is another header I can set which means "This document will never change, don't bother me again".

    Read the article

  • DataGridView with row-specific DataGridViewComboBoxColumn contents

    - by XXXXX
    So I have something like the following data structure (constructors omitted) class Child { public string Name { get; set; } public int Age { get; set; } } class Parent { public string Name { get; set; } public List <Child> Children { get; private set; } // never null; list never empty public Child FavoriteChild { get; set; } // never null; always a reference to a Child in Children } List < Parent > Parents; What I want to do is show a DataGridView where each row is a Parent from Parent list. Each row should have two columns: a text box showing the parent's name and a DataGridViewComboBoxColumn containing that parent's children, from which the user can select the parent's favorite child. I suppose I could do the whole thing manually, but I'd like to do all this with more-or-less standard Data Binding. It's easy enough to bind the DataGridView to the list of parents, and easy enough to bind the selected child to the FavoriteChild property. The part that's giving me difficulty is that it looks like the Combo Box column wants to bind to one data source for all the combo-box's contents on all rows. I'd like each instance of the combo box to bind to the list of each parent's children. I'm fairly new to C#/Windows Forms, so I may well be missing something obvious. Or it could be that "you can't get there from here." It's not too tough to make a separate list of all the children and filter it by parent; I'm looking into that possibility right now. Is this feasible, or is there a better way?

    Read the article

  • Asp.Net MVC - Binding of parameter to model value!

    - by Pino
    This seems like the model binding is causing me issues. Essentially I have a model called ProductOption and for the purpose of this question it has 2 fields ID (Int) PK ProductID (Int) FK I have a standard route set-up context.MapRoute( "Product_default", "Product/{controller}/{action}/{id}", new { controller = "Product", action = "Index", id = UrlParameter.Optional } ); and if the user wants to add an option the URL is, /Product/Options/Add/1 in the above URL 1 is the ProductID, I have the following code to return a blank model the the view, [HttpGet] public ActionResult Add(int id) { return View("Manage", new ProductOptionModel() { ProductID = id }); } Now in my view I keep a hidden field <%= Html.HiddenFor(x=>x.ID) %> This is used to determine (on submit) if we are editing or adding a new option. However the Model binder in .net seems to replace .ID (Which was 0 when leaving the above get actionresult) with 1 (or the value of the id parameter in the URL) How can I stop or work around this? ViewModel public class ProductExtraModel { //Database public int ID { get; set; } public string Name { get; set; } public int ProductID { get; set; } public ProductModel Product { get; set; } }

    Read the article

  • Trying to import SQL file in a xampp server returns error

    - by Victor_J_Martin
    I have done a ER diagram in Mysql Workbench, and I am trying load in my server with phpMyAdmin, but it returns me the next error: Error SQL Query: -- ----------------------------------------------------- -- Table `BDA`.`UG` -- ----------------------------------------------------- CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `BDA`.`UG` ( `numero_ug` INT NOT NULL, `nombre` VARCHAR(45) NOT NULL, `segunda_firma_autorizada` VARCHAR(45) NOT NULL, `fecha_creacion` DATE NOT NULL, `nombre_depto` VARCHAR(140) NOT NULL, `dni` INT NOT NULL, `anho_contable` INT NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`numero_ug`), INDEX `nombre_depto_idx` (`nombre_depto` ASC), INDEX `dni_idx` (`dni` ASC), INDEX `anho_contable_idx` (`anho_contable` ASC), CONSTRAINT `nombre_depto` FOREIGN KEY (`nombre_depto`) REFERENCES `BDA`.`Departamento` (`nombre_depto`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION, CONSTRAINT `dni` FOREIGN KEY (`dni`) REFERENCES `BDA`.`Trabajador` (`dni`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION, CONSTRAINT `anho_contable` FOREIGN KEY (`anho_contable`) REFERENCES `BDA`.`Capitulo_Contable` (`anho_contable`) [...] MySQL said: Documentation #1022 - Can't write; duplicate key in table 'ug' I export the result of the diagram from Mysql Workbench to a SQL file, and this file is what I'm trying to upload. This is the file. I can not find the duplicate key. SET @OLD_UNIQUE_CHECKS=@@UNIQUE_CHECKS, UNIQUE_CHECKS=0; SET @OLD_FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS=@@FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS, FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS=0; SET @OLD_SQL_MODE=@@SQL_MODE, SQL_MODE='TRADITIONAL,ALLOW_INVALID_DATES'; CREATE SCHEMA IF NOT EXISTS `BDA` DEFAULT CHARACTER SET utf8 COLLATE utf8_general_ci ; USE `BDA` ; -- ----------------------------------------------------- -- Table `BDA`.`Departamento` -- ----------------------------------------------------- CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `BDA`.`Departamento` ( `nombre_depto` VARCHAR(140) NOT NULL, `area_depto` VARCHAR(140) NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`nombre_depto`)) ENGINE = InnoDB; -- ----------------------------------------------------- -- Table `BDA`.`Trabajador` -- ----------------------------------------------------- CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `BDA`.`Trabajador` ( `dni` INT NOT NULL, `direccion` VARCHAR(140) NOT NULL, `nombre` VARCHAR(45) NOT NULL, `apellidos` VARCHAR(140) NOT NULL, `fecha_nacimiento` DATE NOT NULL, `fecha_contrato` DATE NOT NULL, `titulacion` VARCHAR(140) NULL, `nombre_depto` VARCHAR(45) NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`dni`), INDEX `nombre_depto_idx` (`nombre_depto` ASC), CONSTRAINT `nombre_depto` FOREIGN KEY (`nombre_depto`) REFERENCES `BDA`.`Departamento` (`nombre_depto`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION) ENGINE = InnoDB; -- ----------------------------------------------------- -- Table `BDA`.`Capitulo_Contable` -- ----------------------------------------------------- CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `BDA`.`Capitulo_Contable` ( `anho_contable` INT NOT NULL, `numero_ug` INT NOT NULL, `debe` DOUBLE NOT NULL, `haber` DOUBLE NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`anho_contable`), INDEX `numero_ug_idx` (`numero_ug` ASC), CONSTRAINT `numero_ug` FOREIGN KEY (`numero_ug`) REFERENCES `BDA`.`UG` (`numero_ug`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION) ENGINE = InnoDB; -- ----------------------------------------------------- -- Table `BDA`.`UG` -- ----------------------------------------------------- CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `BDA`.`UG` ( `numero_ug` INT NOT NULL, `nombre` VARCHAR(45) NOT NULL, `segunda_firma_autorizada` VARCHAR(45) NOT NULL, `fecha_creacion` DATE NOT NULL, `nombre_depto` VARCHAR(140) NOT NULL, `dni` INT NOT NULL, `anho_contable` INT NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`numero_ug`), INDEX `nombre_depto_idx` (`nombre_depto` ASC), INDEX `dni_idx` (`dni` ASC), INDEX `anho_contable_idx` (`anho_contable` ASC), CONSTRAINT `nombre_depto` FOREIGN KEY (`nombre_depto`) REFERENCES `BDA`.`Departamento` (`nombre_depto`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION, CONSTRAINT `dni` FOREIGN KEY (`dni`) REFERENCES `BDA`.`Trabajador` (`dni`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION, CONSTRAINT `anho_contable` FOREIGN KEY (`anho_contable`) REFERENCES `BDA`.`Capitulo_Contable` (`anho_contable`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION) ENGINE = InnoDB; -- ----------------------------------------------------- -- Table `BDA`.`Cliente` -- ----------------------------------------------------- CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `BDA`.`Cliente` ( `cif_cliente` INT NOT NULL, `nombre_cliente` VARCHAR(140) NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`cif_cliente`)) ENGINE = InnoDB; -- ----------------------------------------------------- -- Table `BDA`.`Ingreso` -- ----------------------------------------------------- CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `BDA`.`Ingreso` ( `id` INT NOT NULL, `concepto` VARCHAR(45) NOT NULL, `importe` DOUBLE NOT NULL, `fecha` DATE NOT NULL, `cif_cliente` INT NOT NULL, `numero_ug` INT NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`id`), INDEX `cif_cliente_idx` (`cif_cliente` ASC), INDEX `numero_ug_idx` (`numero_ug` ASC), CONSTRAINT `cif_cliente` FOREIGN KEY (`cif_cliente`) REFERENCES `BDA`.`Cliente` (`cif_cliente`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION, CONSTRAINT `numero_ug` FOREIGN KEY (`numero_ug`) REFERENCES `BDA`.`UG` (`numero_ug`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION) ENGINE = InnoDB; -- ----------------------------------------------------- -- Table `BDA`.`Proveedor` -- ----------------------------------------------------- CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `BDA`.`Proveedor` ( `cif_proveedor` INT NOT NULL, `nombre_proveedor` VARCHAR(140) NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`cif_proveedor`)) ENGINE = InnoDB; -- ----------------------------------------------------- -- Table `BDA`.`Gasto` -- ----------------------------------------------------- CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `BDA`.`Gasto` ( `id` INT NOT NULL, `concepto` VARCHAR(45) NOT NULL, `importe` DOUBLE NOT NULL, `fecha` DATE NOT NULL, `factura` INT NOT NULL, `cif_proveedor` INT NOT NULL, `numero_ug` INT NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`id`), INDEX `cif_proveedor_idx` (`cif_proveedor` ASC), INDEX `numero_ug_idx` (`numero_ug` ASC), CONSTRAINT `cif_proveedor` FOREIGN KEY (`cif_proveedor`) REFERENCES `BDA`.`Proveedor` (`cif_proveedor`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION, CONSTRAINT `numero_ug` FOREIGN KEY (`numero_ug`) REFERENCES `BDA`.`UG` (`numero_ug`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION) ENGINE = InnoDB; SET SQL_MODE=@OLD_SQL_MODE; SET FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS=@OLD_FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS; SET UNIQUE_CHECKS=@OLD_UNIQUE_CHECKS; Thanks for your advices.

    Read the article

  • NHibernate / Fluent - Mapping multiple objects to single lookup table

    - by Al
    Hi all I am struggling a little in getting my mapping right. What I have is a single self joined table of look up values of certain types. Each lookup can have a parent, which can be of a different type. For simplicities sake lets take the Country and State example. So the lookup table would look like this: Lookups Id Key Value LookupType ParentId - self joining to Id base class public class Lookup : BaseEntity { public Lookup() {} public Lookup(string key, string value) { Key = key; Value = value; } public virtual Lookup Parent { get; set; } [DomainSignature] [NotNullNotEmpty] public virtual LookupType LookupType { get; set; } [NotNullNotEmpty] public virtual string Key { get; set; } [NotNullNotEmpty] public virtual string Value { get; set; } } The lookup map public class LookupMap : IAutoMappingOverride<DBLookup> { public void Override(AutoMapping<Lookup> map) { map.Table("Lookups"); map.References(x => x.Parent, "ParentId").ForeignKey("Id"); map.DiscriminateSubClassesOnColumn<string>("LookupType").CustomType(typeof(LookupType)); } } BASE SubClass map for subclasses public class BaseLookupMap : SubclassMap where T : DBLookup { protected BaseLookupMap() { } protected BaseLookupMap(LookupType lookupType) { DiscriminatorValue(lookupType); Table("Lookups"); } } Example subclass map public class StateMap : BaseLookupMap<State> { protected StateMap() : base(LookupType.State) { } } Now I've almost got my mappings set, however the mapping is still expecting a table-per-class setup, so is expecting a 'State' table to exist with a reference to the states Id in the Lookup table. I hope this makes sense. This doesn't seem like an uncommon approach when wanting to keep lookup-type values configurable. Thanks in advance. Al

    Read the article

  • how to login in google account with app engine webproxy

    - by user313446
    hi,a webproxy on app engine oncyberspace.appspot.com , save cookie in the database, when i try to login in the google with my account, it redirect to google.com . how to solve these problem ? and another problem , when i this the above web to login in twitter,it works !but i can not use it to update my tweet. i don't know why, may be i can't pass oauth . how to solve this ?

    Read the article

  • Combining two UPDATE Commands - Performance ?

    - by Johannes
    If I want to update two rows in a MySQL table, using the following two command: UPDATE table SET Col = Value1 WHERE ID = ID1 UPDATE table SET Col = Value2 WHERE ID = ID2` I usually combine them into one command, so that I do not to have to contact the MySQL server twice from my C client: UPDATE table SET Col = IF( ID = ID1 , Value1 , Value2) WHERE ID=ID1 OR ID=ID2 Is this really a performance gain? Background Information: I am using a custom made fully C written high-performance heavily loaded webserver.

    Read the article

  • Flex: CursorManager does nothing when `stage.mouseChildren = false`?

    - by David Wolever
    I've found that if I use the CursorManager to set a cursor — CursorManager.setBusyCursor() — then set stage.mouseChildren = false, the cursor set by CursorManager is replaced by the "default" mouse cursor the next time the mouse is moved. I'm setting stage.mouseChildren = false so that, while the mouse is being dragged, other "stuff" on the stage won't get mouse events (eg, so that mouse-over affordances aren't triggered if I'm in the middle of a drag). Is there some way I can work around this?

    Read the article

  • EF 4.0 Code only assocation from abstract to derived

    - by Jeroen
    Using EF 4.0 Code only i want to make an assocation between an abstract and normal class. I have class 'Item', 'ContentBase' and 'Test'. 'ContentBase' is abstract and 'Test' derives from it. 'ContentBase' has a property 'Item' that links to an instance of 'Item'. So that 'Test.Item' or any class that derives from 'ContentBase' has an 'Item' navigation property. In my DB every record for Test has a matching record for Item. public class Item { public int Id { get; set;} } public abstract class ContentBase { public int ContentId { get; set;} public int Id { get; set;} public Item Item { get; set;} } public class Test : ContentBase { public string Name { get; set;} } now some init code public void SomeInitFunction() { var itemConfig = new EntityConfiguration<Item>(); itemConfig.HasKey(p => p.Id); itemConfig.Property(p => p.Id).IsIdentity(); this.ContextBuilder.Configurations.Add(itemConfig); var testConfig = new EntityConfiguration<Test>(); testConfig.HasKey(p => p.ContentId); testConfig.Property(p => p.ContentId).IsIdentity(); // the problem testConfig.Relationship(p => p.Item).HasConstraint((p, q) => p.Id == q.Id); this.ContextBuilder.Configurations.Add(testConfig); } This gives an error: A key is registered for the derived type 'Test'. Keys must be registered for the root type 'ContentBase'. anyway i try i get an error. What am i a doing wrong?

    Read the article

  • Performance issues with repeatable loops as control part

    - by djerry
    Hey guys, In my application, i need to show made calls to the user. The user can arrange some filters, according to what they want to see. The problem is that i find it quite hard to filter the calls without losing performance. This is what i am using now : private void ProcessFilterChoice() { _filteredCalls = ServiceConnector.ServiceConnector.SingletonServiceConnector.Proxy.GetAllCalls().ToList(); if (cboOutgoingIncoming.SelectedIndex > -1) GetFilterPartOutgoingIncoming(); if (cboInternExtern.SelectedIndex > -1) GetFilterPartInternExtern(); if (cboDateFilter.SelectedIndex > -1) GetFilteredCallsByDate(); wbPdf.Source = null; btnPrint.Content = "Pdf preview"; } private void GetFilterPartOutgoingIncoming() { if (cboOutgoingIncoming.SelectedItem.ToString().Equals("Outgoing")) for (int i = _filteredCalls.Count - 1; i > -1; i--) { if (_filteredCalls[i].Caller.E164.Length > 4 || _filteredCalls[i].Caller.E164.Equals("0")) _filteredCalls.RemoveAt(i); } else if (cboOutgoingIncoming.SelectedItem.ToString().Equals("Incoming")) for (int i = _filteredCalls.Count - 1; i > -1; i--) { if (_filteredCalls[i].Called.E164.Length > 4 || _filteredCalls[i].Called.E164.Equals("0")) _filteredCalls.RemoveAt(i); } } private void GetFilterPartInternExtern() { if (cboInternExtern.SelectedItem.ToString().Equals("Intern")) for (int i = _filteredCalls.Count - 1; i > -1; i--) { if (_filteredCalls[i].Called.E164.Length > 4 || _filteredCalls[i].Caller.E164.Length > 4 || _filteredCalls[i].Caller.E164.Equals("0")) _filteredCalls.RemoveAt(i); } else if (cboInternExtern.SelectedItem.ToString().Equals("Extern")) for (int i = _filteredCalls.Count - 1; i > -1; i--) { if ((_filteredCalls[i].Called.E164.Length < 5 && _filteredCalls[i].Caller.E164.Length < 5) || _filteredCalls[i].Called.E164.Equals("0")) _filteredCalls.RemoveAt(i); } } private void GetFilteredCallsByDate() { DateTime period = DateTime.Now; switch (cboDateFilter.SelectedItem.ToString()) { case "Today": period = DateTime.Today; break; case "Last week": period = DateTime.Today.Subtract(new TimeSpan(7, 0, 0, 0)); break; case "Last month": period = DateTime.Today.AddMonths(-1); break; case "Last year": period = DateTime.Today.AddYears(-1); break; default: return; } for (int i = _filteredCalls.Count - 1; i > -1; i--) { if (_filteredCalls[i].Start < period) _filteredCalls.RemoveAt(i); } } _filtered calls is a list of "calls". Calls is a class that looks like this : [DataContract] public class Call { private User caller, called; private DateTime start, end; private string conferenceId; private int id; private bool isNew = false; [DataMember] public bool IsNew { get { return isNew; } set { isNew = value; } } [DataMember] public int Id { get { return id; } set { id = value; } } [DataMember] public string ConferenceId { get { return conferenceId; } set { conferenceId = value; } } [DataMember] public DateTime End { get { return end; } set { end = value; } } [DataMember] public DateTime Start { get { return start; } set { start = value; } } [DataMember] public User Called { get { return called; } set { called = value; } } [DataMember] public User Caller { get { return caller; } set { caller = value; } } Can anyone direct me to a better solution or make some suggestions.

    Read the article

  • finding subfolder of a folder getting by getFolder method in asp

    - by Abhisheks.net
    hello guys, i am troubling from this problem , i want to find the list of folder but there is some problem , i have a support folder in root directory, first i have the subfolder of this "Support" folder then in each folder i have to find a specific say "x" folder and then in this x folder i want to check each file and folder. i am sending here code . please help me .... dim fs, fso, fo, s, x, f, filePath, a, sfPath set fs=Server.CreateObject("Scripting.FileSystemObject") set fo=fs.GetFolder(Server.MapPath("support/")) a = Split(pSku,"-",-1) for each x in fo.SubFolders sfPath= "support/" + x.Name + "/" + a(0) + "/" 'a(0) contains a folder name set s = fs.GetFolder(server.MapPath(sfPath)) set s = nothing next Please tell me solution ..

    Read the article

  • Fluent many-to-many: Deleting one end does not remove the entry in the relation table

    - by Kristoffer
    I have two classes (Parent, Child) that have a many-to-many relationship that only one end (Parent) knows about. My problem is that when I delete a "relation unaware" object (Child), the record in the many-to-many table is left. I want the relationship to be removed regardless of which end of it is deleted. How can I do that with Fluent NHibernate mappings, without adding a Parent property on Child? The classes: public class Parent { public Guid Id { get; set; } public IList<Child> Children { get; set; } } public class Child { public Guid Id { get; set; } // Don't want the property below: // public Parent Parent { get; set; } }

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337  | Next Page >