Search Results

Search found 27337 results on 1094 pages for 't sql'.

Page 332/1094 | < Previous Page | 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339  | Next Page >

• SQL - Outer Join 2 queries?

  - by Stuav

  I have two querys. Query 1 gives me this result: Day New_Users 01-Jan-12 45 02-Jan-12 36 and so on. Query 2 gives me this result: Day Retained_Users 01-Jan-12 33 02-Jan-12 30 and so on. I want a new query that will join this together and read: Day New_Users Retained_Users 01-Jan-12 45 33 02-Jan-12 36 30 Do I use some sort of outer join?

  Read the article

• SQL Server - What's in that log backup?

  - by anon

  So I noticed that one of my log backups is about 1000x larger than normal. I'd like to see what is in there. Is there something I can use to read it? Thanks!

  Read the article

• Do the speed of the query depends on the number of rows in the table ?

  - by Omu

  let's say I have this query: select * from table1 r where r.x = 5 do the speed of this query depends on the number of rows that are present in table1 ?

  Read the article

• php, sql selection

  - by cosy

  I have a stupid question, I have this table : id_product name value 1 price 10-20 1 type computer 2 price 20-30 3 price 100-200 and I want to select from this table GROUP BY id_product and ORDER BY value WHERE name='price' how can i do this? Thanks a lot

  Read the article

• Is it a good idea to use a computed column as part of a primary key ?

  - by Brann

  I've got a table defined as : OrderID bigint NOT NULL, IDA varchar(50) NULL, IDB bigint NULL, [ ... 50 other non relevant columns ...] The natural primary key for this table would be (OrderID,IDA,IDB), but this it not possible because IDA and IDB can be null (they can both be null, but they are never both defined at the same time). Right now I've got a unique constraint on those 3 columns. Now, the thing is I need a primary key to enable transactional replication, and I'm faced with two choices : Create an identity column and use it as a primary key Create a non-null computed column C containing either IDA or IDB or '' if both columns were null, and use (OrderID,C) as my primary key. The second alternative seams cleaner as my PK would be meaningful, and is feasible (see msdn link), but since I've never seen this done anywhere, I was wondering if they were some cons to this approach.

  Read the article

• how to create before update trigger in sql server 2005

  - by nectar

  Is there anyway where I can create a trigger which will execute before the update/delete takes place( and then the actual update/delete takes place)? and how can I drop a trigger from a table?

  Read the article

• IF statement error

  - by Jasl

  I have the following columns in TableA TableA Column1 varchar Column2 int Column3 bit I am using this statement IF Column3 = 0 SELECT Column1, Column2 FROM TableA WHERE Column2 > 200 ELSE SELECT Column1, Column2 FROM TableA WHERE Column2 < 200 But the statment does not compile. It says Invalid Column Name 'Column3'

  Read the article

• Best way to return result from business layer to presentation layer when using LINQ-to-SQL

  - by samsur

  I have a business layer that has DTOs that are used in the presentation layer. This application uses entity framework. Here is an example of a class called RoleDTO: public class RoleDTO { public Guid RoleId { get; set; } public string RoleName { get; set; } public string RoleDescription { get; set; } public int? OrganizationId { get; set; } } In the BLL I want to have a method that returns a list of DTO. I would like to know which is the better approach: returning IQueryable or list of DTOs. Although I feel that returning IQueryable is not a good idea because the connection needs to be open. Here are the 2 different methods using the different approaches: First approach public class RoleBLL { private servicedeskEntities sde; public RoleBLL() { sde = new servicedeskEntities(); } public IQueryable<RoleDTO> GetAllRoles() { IQueryable<RoleDTO> role = from r in sde.Roles select new RoleDTO() { RoleId = r.RoleID, RoleName = r.RoleName, RoleDescription = r.RoleDescription, OrganizationId = r.OrganizationId }; return role; } Note: in the above method the DataContext is a private attribute and set in the constructor, so that the connection stays opened. Second approach public static List<RoleDTO> GetAllRoles() { List<RoleDTO> roleDTO = new List<RoleDTO>(); using (servicedeskEntities sde = new servicedeskEntities()) { var roles = from pri in sde.Roles select new { pri.RoleID, pri.RoleName, pri.RoleDescription }; //Add the role entites to the DTO list and return. This is necessary as anonymous types can be returned acrosss methods foreach (var item in roles) { RoleDTO roleItem = new RoleDTO(); roleItem.RoleId = item.RoleID; roleItem.RoleDescription = item.RoleDescription; roleItem.RoleName = item.RoleName; roleDTO.Add(roleItem); } return roleDTO; } } Please let me know, if there is a better approach.

  Read the article

• Oracle SQL Update query takes days to update

  - by B Senthil Kumar

  I am trying to update a record in the target table based on the record coming in from source. For instance, if the incoming record is present in the target table I would update them in the target else I would simply insert. I have over one million records in my source while my target has 46 million records. The target table is partitioned based on calendar key. I implement this whole logic using Informatica. I find that the Informatica code is perfectly fine looking at the Informatica session log but its in the update it takes long time (more than 5 days to update one million records). Any suggestions as to what can be done on the scenario to improve the performance?

  Read the article

• How to Shrink Transaction log in sql server database in replication

  - by Renju

  Hi I'm having a production database and its replicated report database. How to shrink the transaction log files in the production database as the log file size is increasing. I had tried DBCC SHRINKFILE and SHRINKDATABASE commands but it does not work for me. I can't detach and shrink and attach back as the db in replication. Please help me in this issue.

  Read the article

• sum of Times in SQL

  - by LIX

  Hello all, I have some records like this: ID Personel_Code Time --- ------------- ------ 1 0011 05:50 3 0011 20:12 4 0012 00:50 I want to have the sum of times for each person. in this example I want to have the result like this : Personel_Code Time ------------- ----- 0011 26:02 0012 00:50 Thank you.

  Read the article

• Mysql SQL join question

  - by David

  I am trying to find all deals information along with how many comments they have received. My query select deals.*, count(comments.comments_id) as counts from deals left join comments on comments.deal_id=deals.deal_id where cancelled='N' But now it only shows the deals that have at least one comment. What is the problem?

  Read the article

• SQL Server: Cross-tabulation, please help

  - by user335160

  I want to achieve the results shown in the attached image. The table structure and data are: Table relationship: Facility Limit -> one to many -> Facility Sub Limit Tables structure and data Facility Limit Id OverallIBLimitId Product Type 1 1 RPA 2 1 CG 3 2 RPA 4 3 CG Facility Sub Limit Id FacilityLimitId Sub-Limit Type Amount Tenor Status Status Date 1 1 RPA at max 2,000,0000.00 2 months Approved January 5, 2011 2 1 Oil 3,000,0000.00 3 yrs Approved January 5, 2011 3 2 CG at minor 4,000,0000.00 1 yr Approved January 5, 2011 4 2 CG at max 5,000,0000.00 6 months Approved January 5, 2011 5 2 Flood Component 1 5,000,0000.00 6 months Approved January 5, 2011 6 2 Flood Component 2 6,000,0000.00 3 yrs Approved January 5, 2011 7 3 RPA at minor 1,000,0000.00 6 months Approved January 5, 2011 8 4 One-Off 1,000,0000.00 6 months Approved January 5, 2011

  Read the article

• Split table and insert with identity link

  - by The King

  Hi.. I have 3 tables similar to the sctructure below CREATE TABLE [dbo].[EmpBasic]( [EmpID] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL Primary Key, [Name] [varchar](50), [Address] [varchar](50) ) CREATE TABLE [dbo].[EmpProject]( [EmpID] [int] NOT NULL primary key, // referencing column with EmpBasic [EmpProject] [varchar](50) ) CREATE TABLE [dbo].[EmpFull_Temp]( [ObjectID] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL Primary Key, [T1Name] [varchar](50) , [T1Address] [varchar](50) , [T1EmpProject] [varchar](50) ) The EmpFull_Temp table has the records with a dummy object ID column... I want to populate the first 2 tables with the records in this table... But with EmpID as a reference between the first 2 tables. I tried this in a stored procedure... Create Table #IDSS (EmpID bigint, objID bigint) Insert into EmpBasic output Inserted.EmpID, EmpFull_Temp.ObjectID into #IDSS Select T1Name, T1Address from EmpFull_Temp Where ObjectID < 106 Insert into EmpProject Select A.EmpID, B.T1EmpProject from #IDSS as A, EmpFull_Temp as B Where A.ObjID = B.ObjectID But it says.. The multi-part identifier "EmpFull_Temp.ObjectID" could not be bound. Could you please help me in achieving this...

  Read the article

• Wrong SQLServer syntax: need help!

  - by user512602

  Hi, this is what I want to achieve: 4 tables are involved: Players with PlayerID as PK, Competitions with CompetID as PK Results with ResultID as PK and CompetID as FK And the 4th table: PlayerResultts with ResultID + PlayerID as PK and CompetID as new column I created. Competitions, results and PlayerResults are already populated and quite large (300000 PlayerResults so far). In order to populate the PlayerResults.CompetID column, I try a Update ... (Select....) request but I'm not aware of the right syntax and it fails. Here is my feeble attempt: update PlayerResults set competid = (select distinct(r.competid) from results r, playerresults p where r.resultID = p.resultid) Error is (of course): "Msg 512, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 Subquery returned more than 1 value. This is not permitted when the subquery follows =, !=, <, <= , , = or when the subquery is used as an expression." Can someone put me in the right direction? TIA

  Read the article

• SQL Select queries

  - by sds

  Which is better and what is the difference? SELECT * FROM TABLE_A A WHERE A.ID IN (SELECT B.ID FROM TABLE_B B) or SELECT * FROM TABLE_A A, TABLE_B B WHERE A.ID = B.ID

  Read the article

• sql question regarding sum() and tax (MySQL 5.0.89)

  - by jason

  Select id, sum(amount), vat From transactions WHERE id=1; Each record in this table has a vat percentage, I need to get the total amount in all records, however each amount has to be multiplied by by its vat %. Is there away to do this without looping through all records?

  Read the article

• How to track auto-generated id's in select-insert statement

  - by k rey

  I have two tables detail and head. The detail table will be written first. Later, the head table will be written. The head is a summary of the detail table. I would like to keep a reference from the detail to the head table. I have a solution but it is not elegant and requires duplicating the joins and filters that were used during summation. I am looking for a better solution. The below is an example of what I currently have. In this example, I have simplified the table structure. In the real world, the summation is very complex. -- Preparation create table #detail ( detail_id int identity(1,1) , code char(4) , amount money , head_id int null ); create table #head ( head_id int identity(1,1) , code char(4) , subtotal money ); insert into #detail ( code, amount ) values ( 'A', 5 ); insert into #detail ( code, amount ) values ( 'A', 5 ); insert into #detail ( code, amount ) values ( 'B', 2 ); insert into #detail ( code, amount ) values ( 'B', 2 ); -- I would like to somehow simplify the following two queries insert into #head ( code, subtotal ) select code, sum(amount) from #detail group by code update #detail set head_id = h.head_id from #detail d inner join #head h on d.code = h.code -- This is the desired end result select * from #detail Desired end result of detail table: detail_id code amount head_id 1 A 5.00 1 2 A 5.00 1 3 B 2.00 2 4 B 2.00 2

  Read the article

• Is adding a bit mask to all tables in a database useful?

  - by Tom

  A colleague is adding a bit mask to all our database tables. In theory this is so we can track certain properties of each row across the entire system. For example... Is the row shipped with the system or added by the client once they've started using the system Has the row been deleted from the table (soft deletes) Is the row a default value within a set of rows Is this a good idea? Are there other uses where this approach would be beneficial? My preference is these properties are obviously important, and having a dedicated column for each property is justified to make what is happening clearer to fellow developers.

  Read the article

• SQL ORDER BY thing1 ASC, thing2 DESC not working

  - by William

  it puts item1 down as DESC for some reason. edit: $sql_result = mysql_query("SELECT post, name, trip, Thread, sticky FROM (SELECT MIN(ID) AS min_id, MAX(ID) AS max_id, MAX(Date) AS max_date FROM test_posts GROUP BY Thread ) t_min_max INNER JOIN test_posts ON test_posts.ID = t_min_max.min_id WHERE Board=".$board." ORDER BY sticky ASC, max_date DESC", $db); http://prime.programming-designs.com/test_forum/viewboard.php?board=0&page=3

  Read the article

• Help with Oracle SQL Count function! =)

  - by user363024

  Hi guys.. The question im struggling with is this: i have a list of helicopter names in different charters and i need to find out WHICH helicopter has the least amount of charters booked. Once i find that out i need to ONLY display the one that has the least. I so far have this: SELECT Helicopter_Name COUNT (Distinct Charter_NUM) FROM Charter_Table GROUP BY Helicopter Name ^ this is where i am stuck, i realise MIN could be used to pick out the value that is the smallest but i am not sure how to integrate this into the command. Something like Where MIN = MIN Value Id really appreciate it

  Read the article

• Find overdrawn accounts in SQL

  - by mazzzzz

  Hey guys, I have a program that allows me to run queries against a large database. I have two tables that are important right now, Deposits and withdraws. Each contains a history of every user. I need to take each table, add up every deposit and withdraws (per user), then subtract the withdraws from the deposits. I then need to return every user whos result is negative (aka they withdrew more then they deposited). Is this possible in one query? Example: Deposit Table: |ID|UserName|Amount| |1 | Use1 |100.00| |2 | Use1 |50.00 | |3 | Use2 |25.00 | |4 | Use1 | 5.00 | WithDraw Table: |ID|UserName|Amount| |2 | Use2 | 5.00 | |1 | Use1 |100.00| |4 | Use1 | 5.00 | |3 | Use2 |25.00 | So then the result would output: |OverWithdrawers| | Use2 | Is this possible (I sure don't know how to do it)? Thanks for any help, Max

  Read the article

• Query in sql involving joins of two table

  - by Satish

  I have two tables reports and holidays. reports: (username varchar(30),activity varchar(30),hours int(3),report_date date) holidays: (holiday_name varchar(30), holiday_date date) select * from reports gives +----------+-----------+---------+------------+ | username | activity | hours | date | +----------+-----------+---------+------------+ | prasoon | testing | 3 | 2009-01-01 | | prasoon | coding | 4 | 2009-01-03 | | prasoon | coding | 4 | 2009-01-06 | | prasoon | coding | 4 | 2009-01-10 | +----------+-----------+---------+------------+ select * from holidays gives +--------------+---------------+ | holiday_name | holiday_date | +--------------+---------------+ | Diwali | 2009-01-02 | | Holi | 2009-01-05 | +--------------+---------------+ Is there any way by which I can output the following? +-------------+-----------+---------+-------------------+ | date | activity | hours | holiday_name | +-------------+-----------+---------+-------------------+ | 2009-01-01 | testing | 3 | | | 2009-01-02 | | | Diwali | | 2009-01-03 | coding | 4 | | | 2009-01-04 | Absent | Absent | | | 2009-01-05 | | | Holi | | 2009-01-06 | coding | 4 | | | 2009-01-07 | Absent | Absent | | | 2009-01-08 | Absent | Absent | | | 2009-01-09 | Absent | Absent | | | 2009-01-10 | coding | 4 | | +-------------+-----------+---------+-------------------+ In other words I want to fill the activity and hours columns with "Absent" on the dates which are neither in table reports nor in table holidays. How can I write a specific query for it. The query should give the output between two specific dates.

  Read the article

• SQL Agent Job - to execute as queue

  - by BINEESHTHOMAS

  I have a job which is calling 10 other jobs using sp_start_job. The job is having 10 steps, each step calling each sub jobs, When i execute the main job, i can see it started with step 1 and in a few secods it shows 'finished successfully' But the jobs take long time time, and when i see the log mechanism i have put inside , it shows the all the 10 steps are running simultaniously at the back, till it finishes after few hours. My requirement is, it should finish step 1 first and then only step2 should start. aNY HELP PLS ?

  Read the article

• Dynamic Like Statement in SQL

  - by Peter McElhinney

  Hey there! I've been racking my brain on how to do this for a while, and i know that some genius on this site will have the answer. Basically i'm trying to do this: SELECT column FROM table WHERE [table][column] LIKE string1 OR [table][column] LIKE string2 OR [table][column] LIKE string3... for a list of search strings stored in a column of a table. Obviously I can't do a like statement for each string by hand because i want the table to be dynamic. Any suggestions would be great. :D EDIT: I'm using MSSQL :(

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339  | Next Page >