Search Results

Search found 45852 results on 1835 pages for 'event id 861'.

Page 338/1835 | < Previous Page | 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345  | Next Page >

• Single SQL Server Result Set from Query

  - by JamesC

  Hi Please advise on how to merge two results in to one using SQL Server 2005. I have the situation where an Account can have up to two Settlement Instructions and this have been modeled like so: The slim-ed down schema: Account --------------------- Id AccountName PrimarySettlementId (nullable) AlternateSettlementId (nullable) SettlementInstruction ---------------------- Id Name The output I want is a single result set with a select statement something along the lines of this which will allow me to construct some java objects in my Spring row mapper: select Account.Id as accountId, Account.AccountName as accountName, s1.Id as primarySettlementId, s1.Name as primarySettlementName, s2.Id as alternateSettlementId, s2.Name as alternateSettlementName I've tried various things but cannot find a way to get the result set merged in to one where the primary and alternate FK's are not null. Finally I have searched the forum, but nothing quite seems to fit with what I need.

  Read the article

• [Ruby on Rails] complex model relationship

  - by siulamvictor

  I am not sure am I doing these correct. I have 3 models, Account, User, and Event. Account contains a group of Users. Each User have its own username and password for login, but they can access the same Account data under the same Account. Events is create by a User, which other Users in the same Account can also read or edit it. I created the following migrations and models. User migration class CreateUsers < ActiveRecord::Migration def self.up create_table :users do |t| t.integer :account_id t.string :username t.string :password t.timestamps end end def self.down drop_table :users end end Account migration class CreateAccounts < ActiveRecord::Migration def self.up create_table :accounts do |t| t.string :name t.timestamps end end def self.down drop_table :accounts end end Event migration class CreateEvents < ActiveRecord::Migration def self.up create_table :events do |t| t.integer :account_id t.integer :user_id t.string :name t.string :location t.timestamps end end def self.down drop_table :events end end Account model class Account < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :users has_many :events end User model class User < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :account end Event model class Event < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :account belongs_to :user end so.... Is this setting correct? Every time when a user create a new account, the system will as for the user information, i.e. username and password. How can I add them into correct tables? How can I add a new event? I am sorry for such a long question. I am not very understand the rails way in handling such data structure. Thank you guys for answering me. :)

  Read the article

• CodeIgniter Active Record Queries W/ Sub Queries

  - by Mike

  Question: I really am trying to stick to using ActiveRecord and not using straight SQL.. can someone help me convert this to activerecord? Trying to get the email address and contact name from another table. map_userfields table is a one to many, multiple rows per p.id. one row per p.id per uf.fieldid. see this screenshot for a reference to the map_userfields table: Current Non active record query SELECT p.id, (SELECT uf.fieldvalue FROM map_userfields uf WHERE uf.pointid = p.id AND uf.fieldid = 20) As ContactName, (SELECT uf.fieldvalue FROM map_userfields uf WHERE uf.pointid = p.id AND uf.fieldid = 31) As ContactEmail FROM map_points p WHERE /** $pointCategory is an array of categories to look for **/ p.type IN($pointCategory) Note: I am using CodeIgniter 2.1.x, MySQL 5.x, php 5.3

  Read the article

• JSON onFailure issue

  - by Mikey1980

  I’m having trouble getting a AJAX/JSON function to work correctly. I had this function grabbing value from a drop down box but now I want to use an anchor tag to set it's value. I thought it would be easy to just use the onClick event to pass string to the function I was using for the drop down box but I get the alert in JSON onFailure event even though data gets added to MySQL. I tried removing the alert from onFailure event but then it doesn't add the data. The drop down still continues work work fine, no alerts. (I should note that removing the alert also broke my drop down box) 1st I add an onClick event… <a href="<?php echo Settings::get('app.webroot'); ?>?view=schedule&action=questions" onmouseout="MM_swapImgRestore();" onmouseover="MM_swapImage('bre','','template/images/schedule/bre_f2.gif',1)" onclick="assignCallType('testing')";> 2nd I check main.js.php function assignCallType(type) { alert(type); new Request.JSON({ url: "ajax.php", onSuccess: function(rtndata,txt){ if (rtndata['STATUS'] != 'OK') alert('Status was not okay'); }, onFailure : function () { alert("onFailure") } }).get({ 'action': 'assignCallType', 'call_type': type }); } 3rd Ajax.php: the variable is back in PHP and values get added to MySQL but I get the Alert in the JSON onFailure event if ($_GET['action'] == "assignCallType") { if ($USER->isInsideSales()) { $call_type = $_GET['call_type']; $_SESSION['callinfo']->setCallType($call_type); $_SESSION['callinfo']->save($callid); echo json_encode(array('STATUS'=>'OK')); } else { echo json_encode(array('STATUS'=>'DENIED')); } } Any idea where I am going wrong. The only difference between this and the working drop down is how the function was called, I used onchange="assignCallType(this.value)".

  Read the article

• Optimise & improve performance of this MYSQL query

  - by David

  SELECT u.id, u.honour, COUNT(*) + 1 AS rank FROM user_info u INNER JOIN user_info u2 ON u.honour < u2.honour WHERE u.id = '$id' AND u2.status = 'Alive' AND u2.rank != '14' This query is currently utterly raping my server. It works out based on your honour what rank you are within the 'user_info' table which stores it out of all our users. Screenshot for explain. http://cl.ly/370z0v2Y3v2X1t1r1k2A SELECT u.id, u.honour, COUNT(*)+1 as rank FROM user_info u USE INDEX (prestigeOptimiser) INNER JOIN user_info u2 ON u.honour < u2.honour WHERE u.id='3' AND u2.status='Alive' AND u2.rank!='14'

  Read the article

• Events convention - I don't get it

  - by bobjink

  My class with an event: public class WindowModel { public delegate void WindowChangedHandler(object source, WindowTypeEventArgs e); public event WindowChangedHandler WindowChanged; public void GotoWindow(WindowType windowType) { this.currentWindow = windowType; this.WindowChanged.Invoke(this, new WindowTypeEventArgs(windowType)); } } Derived event class: public class WindowTypeEventArgs : EventArgs { public readonly WindowType windowType; public WindowTypeEventArgs(WindowType windowType) { this.windowType = windowType; } } Some other class that register it to the event: private void SetupEvents() { this.WindowModel.WindowChanged += this.ChangeWindow; } private void ChangeWindow(object sender, WindowTypeEventArgs e) { //change window } What have I gained from following the .Net convention? It would make more sense to have a contract like this public delegate void WindowChangedHandler(WindowType windowType); public event WindowChangedHandler WindowChanged; Doing it this way, I don't need to create a new class and is easier to understand. I am not coding a .Net library. This code is only going to be used in this project. I like conventions but am I right when I say that in this example it does not make sense or have i missunderstood something?

  Read the article

• How to find specific row in MySQL query result?

  - by Šime Vidas

  So I do this to retrieve my entire table: $result = mysql_query( 'SELECT * FROM mytable' ); Then, in another part of my PHP-page, I do another query (for a specific row): $result2 = mysql_query( 'SELECT * FROM mytable WHERE id = ' . $id ); $row = mysql_fetch_array( $result2 ); So, I'm performing two querys. However, I don't really have to do that, do I? I mean, the row that I'm retrieving in my second query already is present in $result (the result of my first query), since it contains my entire table. Therefore, instead of doing the second query, I would like to extract the desired row from $result directly (while keeping $result itself in tact). How would I do that? OK, so this is how I've implemented it: function getRowById ( $result, $id ) { while ( $row = mysql_fetch_array( $result ) ) { if ( $row['id'] == $id ) { mysql_data_seek( $result, 0 ); return $row; } } }

  Read the article

• Allow only numeric values in textbox not working in Firefox

  - by AsM

  I have one Textbox accepting Bank A/c Number value which should be numerical only. I have written one javascript function for this as follows. function fncInputNumericValuesOnly() { if(!(event.keyCode=48||event.keyCode<=57)) { event.returnValue=false; } } This code is not allowing non-numerical values in IE. but same is not working in Firefox. I also tried to use onkeyup event. & also tried on pageload txtAccountNumber.Attributes.Add("onkeyup","fncInputNumericValuesOnly()") Why this is not working with firefox 3.

  Read the article

• how do i release the auto increment serial nos that are missing

  - by mmdel

  i have a table with auto increment field and i am using transactions when inserting new data. now i find there are a few serial nos that are missing. suppose the last serial no was 475, now when i insert new row, the serial allotted to it is 481. how do i correct this. table_A fields ID(Auto increment),Name,Address table_B fields ID(Auto increment FK TO table_A ID),Tel,Fax,Email,Salesman table_C fields ID(Auto increment FK TO table_A ID),monthly_commitment mysql_query(BEGIN); $a = mysql_query("INSERT INTO table_A VALUES('','name','address')"); $b = mysql_query("INSERT INTO table_B VALUES('','tel','fax','email','salesman')"); $b = mysql_query("INSERT INTO table_C VALUES('','monthly commitment')"); if(($a) && ($b) && ($c)){mysql_query("COMMIT");} else {mysql_query("ROLLBACK");}

  Read the article

• why single SQL delete statement will cause deadlock?

  - by George2

  Hello everyone, I am using SQL Server 2008 Enterprise. I am wondering why even a single delete statement of this store procedure will cause deadlock if executed by multiple threads at the same time? For the delete statement, Param1 is a column of table FooTable, Param1 is a foreign key of another table (refers to another primary key clustered index column of the other table). There is no index on Param1 itself for table FooTable. FooTable has another column which is used as clustered primary key, but not Param1 column. create PROCEDURE [dbo].[FooProc] ( @Param1 int ,@Param2 int ,@Param3 int ) AS DELETE FooTable WHERE Param1 = @Param1 INSERT INTO FooTable ( Param1 ,Param2 ,Param3 ) VALUES ( @Param1 ,@Param2 ,@Param3 ) DECLARE @ID bigint SET @ID = ISNULL(@@Identity,-1) IF @ID > 0 BEGIN SELECT IdentityStr FROM FooTable WHERE ID = @ID END thanks in advance, George

  Read the article

• SQL Selecting from one table OR another then joining the two

  - by Cyprus106

  So this is interesting, and apparently beyond my SQL skillset. I need to select a particular record where an ID="0003" (or whatever) from either table1 or table2 if table1 doesn't have that record. Then I need to join table1 and table2 on a mutual field they both have (field name is Product_ID) I was playing with all sorts of variations of the following, (no, it doesn't work) but after 2 days of groping through the internet and a big SQL book I still can't figure anything out. SELECT ProductStock.Product_ID AS PSID, Products.ID AS PID, ProductStock.*, Products.* FROM ProductStock, Products LEFT JOIN (Products AS Pr) ON Pr.ID=ProductStock.Product_ID WHERE (ProductStock.ID="6003" OR Products.ID="6003")

  Read the article

• How do you modify the data returned from an AJAX call before it is rendered in the jqGrid?

  - by GiddyUpHorsey

  I'm trying to modify the data returned from an AJAX call before jqGrid 3.7.2 renders it. I've tried hooking into the loadComplete event but when I modify the data it appears to be after it has already rendered. I've also tried hooking into the success event on the ajaxGridOptions field of options but that seems to totally override the event and jqGrid doesn't render the data. How can I modify the data returned from a web service call before jqGrid renders it?

  Read the article

• Detecting html textarea's change

  - by Colby77

  Hi, I'd like to monitor my textarea's changes with jQuery. I can do this with the keyup event and it works perfectly. But what event I can get when a user click on the textarea (right mouse click), then choose paste? Click event occur only when the user click with the left mouse button on the textarea. How can I handle this situation?

  Read the article

• How to resolve Resharper's "unused property" warning on properties solely for Display/Value Members?

  - by JYelton

  I have defined two properties "Name" and "ID" for an object which I use for the DisplayMember and ValueMember of a ComboBox with a BindingList datasource. I recently installed Resharper to evaluate it. Resharper is giving me warnings on the object that the two properties are unused. Sample code: BindingList<ClassSample> SampleList = new BindingList<ClassSample>(); // populate SampleList cmbSampleSelector.DisplayMember = "Name"; cmdSampleSelector.ValueMember = "ID"; cmbSampleSelector.DataSource = SampleList; private class ClassSample { private string _name; private string _id; public string Name // Resharper believes this property is unused { get { return _name; } } public string ID // Resharper believes this property is unused { get {return _id; } } public ClassSample(string Name, string ID) { _name = Name; _id = ID; } } Am I doing something wrong or is Resharper clueless about this particular usage?

  Read the article

• Why Is the sender type null when dealing with events

  - by ChloeRadshaw

  From C# Via CLR: Note A lot of people wonder why the event pattern requires the sender parameter to always be of type Object After all, since the MailManager will be the only type raising an event with a NewMail EventArgs object, it makes more sense for the callback method to be prototyped like this: void MethodName(Mai l Manager sender, NewMail EventArgs e); The pattern requires the sender parameter to be of type Object mostly because of inheritance What if Mai lManager were used as a base class for SmtpMailManager? In this case, the callback method should have the sender parameter prototyped as SmtpMailManager instead of Mail Manager, but this can’t happen because SmtpMai lManager just inherited the NewMai l event So the code that was expecting SmtpMail Manager to raise the event must still have to cast the sender argument to SmtpMailManager In other words, the cast is still required, so the sender parameter might as well be typed as Obj ect The next reason for typing the sender parameter as Obj ect is just fexibility It allows the delegate to be used by multiple types that offer an event that passes a NewMail EventArgs object For example, a PopMai lManager class could use the delegate even if this class were not derived from Mail Manager I just simply cannot understand why the sender is an object - Why can it not be generified? so most of the time we do not need to do generic casts

  Read the article

• check if username exists on form submit

  - by Developer

  This is my code. .js $(document).ready(function() { $("#username").focusout(function() { $.ajax({ type:'post', url:site_url()+'/client/checkUserName', data:{'username':$("#username").val()}, dataType:'json', success:function(result){ if(result != 'false'){ $('#message').text('Username exists'); } } }); }); .html <form id='form1' method="post"> <input type="text" name="username" id="username"/> <span id="message" style="color:red"></span> <input type="submit" value="submit" id="regis" class="btn"/> </form> Its working fine on focusout. How to make the form to not submit if username exists? Suppose there is a hidden field in the form say <input type="text" hidden id="type" value="<?php echo $type;?>"> Then if value exists in the hidden field then the username neednot be checked if already exists or not.

  Read the article

• how to change the name dynamicaly usign jquery grid

  - by kumar

  hello friends, I am using jquery grid I have jquery grid with user data..First Coulum is ID.. here is the code $("#table").click(function(e) { var row = jQuery(e.target).parent(); Name = row.attr("id"); Friends(Name); }); Now when i click on the row I am getting Id value.. i am passing this id value to one funcation to dispaly name.. I can able to dispaly the name only frist Id.. its not changing each and every row click? Can any body help me out thanks

  Read the article

• MySQL Join Comma Separated Field

  - by neeraj

  I have two tables. First Table is a batch table that contain comma separated student id in field "batch" batch -------------- id batch -------------- 1 1,2 2 3,4 Second Table is marks marks ---------------------- id studentid subject marks 1 1 English 50 2 2 English 40 3 3 English 70 4 1 Math 65 5 4 English 66 6 5 English 75 7 2 Math 55 How we can find those students of first batch id =1 who have scored more than 45 marks in English without using sub query. Problem i found to get this done using a single query is that we can not use IN as an association operator in JOIN statement What changes are required in below query to make it work? SELECT * FROM batch INNER JOIN marks ON marks.studentid IN(batch.batch) where batch.id = 1

  Read the article

• Alert is showing two times. how to restrict?

  - by Dev

  function test(myObject, flag) { if ( (flag) || ((event.keyCode == 59) || (event.which == 59)) || ((event.keyCode == 44) || (event.which == 44))) {alert(myObject.value);} } function closeWin() {self.close();} --foaram name='test' --textaarea name='textareaName' cols='44' rows='3' onChange='test(this, true);' --onKeyPress='test(this);' onBlur='test(this, true);' ---inpaut type='text' name='textName' --inpaut type='button' name='buttonName' onclick='closeWin();' value='Cancel' --/foarm I have a problem: when input value(e.g: test;) into textareaName field, the test function is always run more one time. Please show me the way can run this only one time.

  Read the article

• .save puts NULL in user_id field in Ruby on Rails

  - by mathee

  Here's the model file: class ProfileTag < ActiveRecord::Base def self.create_or_update(options = {}) id = options.delete(:id) record = find_by_id(id) || new record.id = id record.attributes = options puts "record.profile_id is" puts record.profile_id record.save! record end end This gives me the correct print out in my log. But it also says that there's a call to UPDATE that sets profile_id to NULL. I'm not sure I understand why the INSERT puts the value into profile_id properly, but then it sets it to NULL on an UPDATE. If you need more specifics, please let me know. I'm thinking that the save functionality does many things other than INSERTs into the database, but I don't know what I need to specify so that it will properly set profile_id.

  Read the article

• ASP.Net - Help with datagrid/checkboxes/double submit

  - by Gareth D

  We have a simple datagrid. Each row has a checkbox. The checkbox is set to autopostback, and the code-behind has an event handler for the checkbox check-changed event. This all works as expected, nothing complicated. However, we want to disable the checkboxes as soon as one is checked to prevent a double submit i.e. check box checked, all checkboxes are disabled via client side javascript, form submitted. To achieve this I we are injecting some code into the onclick event as follows (note that the alert is just for testing!): Protected Sub DgAccounts_ItemCreated(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.Web.UI.WebControls.DataGridItemEventArgs) Handles DgAccounts.ItemCreated If e.Item.ItemType = ListItemType.Item Or e.Item.ItemType = ListItemType.AlternatingItem Then Dim chk As CheckBox = CType(e.Item.FindControl("chkItemChecked"), CheckBox) chk.Attributes.Add("onclick", "alert('fired ...');DisableAllDataGridCheckBoxes();") End If End Sub When inspecting the source of the rendered page we get the following: <input id="DgAccounts__ctl2_chkItemChecked" type="checkbox" name="DgAccounts:_ctl2:chkItemChecked" onclick="alert('fired ...');DisableAllDataGridCheckBoxes();setTimeout('__doPostBack(\'DgAccounts$_ctl2$chkItemChecked\',\'\')', 0)" language="javascript" /> It all appears in order, however the server side event does not fire – I believe this is due to the checkbox being disabled, as if we just leave the alert in and remove the call to disable the checkbox it all works fine. Can I force the check-changed event to fire even though the check box is disabled?

  Read the article

• Dollar sign and/or Dash breaking Razor's parser

  - by justSteve

  the end-result i'm trying to render: <input type="radio" name="options" id="options_1" />$1 - A Not Very Expensive Chocolate <input type="radio" name="options" id="options_2" />$10 - A Kinda Expensive Chocolate <input type="radio" name="options" id="options_3" />$100 - A Really Expensive Chocolate From this code: @foreach (var o in Model.Options){ <input type="radio" name="options" id=@("options_" + @o.ID) />[email protected] - @o.Label } If i drop both the '$' and the '-' from what should be plain old text - stuff works. Adding either resulted in compiler warnings and runtime errors. I've tried the explicit syntax as described here but haven't found the right combination yet.

  Read the article

• Can't move li elements from one unorderted list to another

  - by Roland

  I have two un-ordered list <ul id="#list1"> <li>one</li> <li>two</li> </ul> <ul id="#list2"></ul> and two buttons <input id="add" name="yt1" type="button" value="<<" /><br /> <input id="remove" name="yt2" type="button" value=">>" /> If the button with the id add is pressed all elements from #list1 should be move to #list2. How do I move elements from one list to another using JQuery I though of something like the below, but not sure how to do the actual moving $("#add").click(function(){ $("#list1 li").each(function(){ //Do not know what to put in here } })

  Read the article

• How to refresh site if $_SESSION variable has changed

  - by 4ndro1d

  I'm writing in my $_SESSION variable from a database, when i clicked a link. public function getProjectById($id){ $query="SELECT * FROM projects WHERE id=\"$id\""; $result=mysql_query($query); $num=mysql_numrows($result); while ($row = mysql_fetch_object($result)) { $_SESSION['projectid'] = $row->id; $_SESSION['projecttitle'] = $row->title; $_SESSION['projectinfo'] = $row->info; $_SESSION['projecttext'] = $row->text; $_SESSION['projectcategory'] = $row->category; } } Now my variable is overwritten and I want to show these variables in my index.php like this: <div id="textContent"> <?php if(isset($_SESSION['projecttext']) && !empty($_SESSION['projecttext'])) { echo $_SESSION['projecttext']; }else { echo 'No text'; } ?></div> But of course, my page will not refresh automatically. How can I do that?

  Read the article

• Get latest record from second table left joined to first table

  - by codef0rmer

  I have a candidate table say candidates having only id field and i left joined profiles table to it. Table profiles has 2 fields namely, candidate_id & name. e.g. Table candidates: id 1 2 and Table `profiles`: candidate_id name 1 Foobar 1 Foobar2 2 Foobar3 i want the latest name of a candidate in a single query which is given below: SELECT C.id, P.name FROM candidates C LEFT JOIN profiles P ON P.candidate_id = C.id GROUP BY C.id ORDER BY P.name; But this query returns: 1 Foobar 2 Foobar3 Instead of: 1 Foobar2 2 Foobar3

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345  | Next Page >