communications suite 7 - Page 34

HP Increases Storage, Networking for Small Business

Expanding its offerings for small business, HP adds more storage, networking and, with Microsoft as a partner, unified communications products.

Producteev Simplifies Task Management

A small business software company aims to seamlessly integrate task management apps into the business communications tools you use every day.

Interprocess Thread Messaging

A class library that creates worker threads and the communications structures for messaging between them.

UC Gaining a Foothold in Government

Survey: Cost savings and productivity boost are seen by workers in all levels of government as primary benefits of unified communications.

Eight VoIP Providers Unite to Support HD Voice

Regional providers form Cloud Communications Alliance to drive first nationwide high-definition network.

XConnect Announces Mobile-Compatible IP Exchange Platform

Gateway will facilitate cross-network IP communications interconnection between members of the global GSM community and XConnect's federation customers.

Microsoft Drops Small Business Phone Software

Despite Microsoft's attempt to get in on the ground floor of small business unified communications, the company now admits it was a losing battle.

JUnit confusion: use 'extend Testcase' or '@Test' ?

I've found the proper use (or at least the documentation) of JUnit very confusing. This question serves both as a future reference and as a real question. If I've understood correctly, there are two main approaches to create and run a JUnit test: Approach A: create a class that extends TestCase, and start test methods with the word test. When running the class as a JUnit Test (in Eclipse), all methods starting with the word test are automatically run. import junit.framework.TestCase; public class DummyTestA extends TestCase { public void testSum() { int a = 5; int b = 10; int result = a + b; assertEquals(15, result); } } Approach B: create a 'normal' class and prepend a @Test annotation to the method. Note that you do NOT have to start the method with the word test. import org.junit.*; import static org.junit.Assert.*; public class DummyTestB { @Test public void Sum() { int a = 5; int b = 10; int result = a + b; assertEquals(15, result); } } Mixing the two seems not to be a good idea, see e.g. this stackoverflow question: Now, my questions(s): What is the preferred approach, or when would you use one instead of the other? Approach B allows for testing for exceptions by extending the @Test annotation like in @Test(expected = ArithmeticException.class). But how do you test for exceptions when using approach A? When using approach A, you can group a number of test classes in a test suite. TestSuite suite = new TestSuite("All tests");<br/> suite.addTestSuite(DummyTestA.class); suite.addTestSuite(DummyTestAbis.class);` But this can't be used with approach B (since each testclass should subclass TestCase). What is the proper way to group tests for approach B?

Search Results

Search found 3738 results on 150 pages for 'communications suite 7'.

Page 34/150 | < Previous Page | 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 | Next Page >

- by Rabarberski

- by question_about_the_problem

- by Ajay Khanna

- by JuergenKress

- by Alex Kotopoulis

- by upkels

- by upkels

- by Louis

- by Sandy

- by ShenoudaB

- by NoCanDo

- by davidchambers

- by HexaHow

- by Tanner

- by chrissygormley

- by kyle.hatlestad

- by Steven Chan

- by Steven Chan

< Previous Page | 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 | Next Page >