Search Results

Search found 11336 results on 454 pages for 'property'.

Page 34/454 | < Previous Page | 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41  | Next Page >

  • Kohana ORM Aliasing and "Trying to get property of non-object"

    - by Toto
    I have the following tables in the database: teams: id name matches: id team1_id team2_id I've defined the following ORM models in my Kohana application: class Match_Model extends ORM { protected $belongs_to = array('team1_id' => 'team', 'team2_id' => 'team'); } class Team_Model extends ORM { protected $has_many = array('matches'); } The following code in a controller: $match = ORM::factory('match',1); echo $match->team1_id->name; /* <-- */ Is throwing the following error on the linke marked with /* <--- */: Trying to get property of non-object The framework is yielding the value of the foreign key instead of a reference to a Match_Model instance as it should (giving the has_many and belongs_to properties stated). Am I missing something? Note: Just in case, I've added the irregular plural 'match' => 'matches' in application/config/inflector.php

    Read the article

  • javascript class calling XMLHttpRequest internally, then handling onreadystatechange

    - by Radu M
    this thing almost works: function myClass(url) { this.source = url; this.rq = null; this.someOtherProperty = "hello"; // open connection to the ajax server this.start = function() { if (window.XMLHttpRequest) { this.rq = new XMLHttpRequest(); if (this.rq.overrideMimeType) this.rq.overrideMimeType("text/xml"); } else this.rq = new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP"); try { this.rq.onreadystatechange = connectionEvent; this.rq.open("GET", this.source, true); this.rq.send(null); this.state = 1; } catch (err) { // some error handler here } } function connectionEvent() { alert("i'm here"); alert("this doesnt work: " + this.someOtherProperty); } } // myClass so it's nothing more than having the XMLHttpRequest object as a member of my class, instead of globally defined, and invoking it in the traditional way. however, inside my connectionEvent callback function, the meaning of "this" is lost, even though the function itself is scoped inside myClass. i also made sure that the object that i instantiate from myClass is kept alive long enough (declared global in the script). in all the examples of using javascript classes that i saw, "this" was still available inside the inner functions. for me, it is not, even if i take my function outside and make it a myClass.prototype.connectionEvent. what am i doing wrong? thank you.

    Read the article

  • Warning: Ignoring library 'com.motorola.android.iextdispservice', missing property value

    - by user1342684
    Hi I am trying to get my eclipse environment setup so I can start playing with programming for android... The Android SDK Manager is installing the following packages (everything else says installed except these two): Android 2.3.3 (API 10) Dual Screen APIs - Not Installed Android 2.2 (API 8) Dual Screen APIs - Not Installed Error Messages: [2012-04-19 13:06:41 - SDK Manager] Warning: Ignoring library 'com.motorola.android.iextdispservice', missing property value [2012-04-19 13:15:27 - SDK Manager] Operation timed out [2012-04-19 13:18:16 - SDK Manager] Operation timed out Any tips? So close to getting the environment ready! I want to start playing around!

    Read the article

  • Output Path property issue on build server

    - by Jay Clarke
    I am working in the .NET 3.5 framework. I have a project that builds fine locally. I can build it on our build server when the source files are posted there. However when I am running the build process through Visual Studio 2010 I get a warning that says "C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework64\v3.5\Microsoft.Common.targets: The OutputPath property is not set for this project. Please check to make sure that you have specified a valid Configuration/Platform combination. Configuration='DEV' Platform='Any CPU'" Any suggestions anyone has or if you need additional information please let me know. I have been struggling with this for a couple of days now. Thanks in advance for your help. Jay Clarke

    Read the article

  • Only apply the property till the text, not whole the line

    - by Santosh
    Here is my the dummy test. Here is the HTML stuff: <h1> Header </h1> Here is the CSS stuff: body { background: pink; } h1 { background-color: #454545; } The webpage is rendered something like this:                      As you can se in this image, I applied the property to the <h1>, but the whole line has its effect. What I want is, the gray background till the word "Header", not more than that (Background color is just an example. This is not only the case.).

    Read the article

  • Javascript won't overwrite CSS display property.

    - by Sorin Buturugeanu
    I have a DIV that is set do display:none from CSS and it's supposed to be made visible (style.display = '';) at some point by javascript. The problem is that if I put the display:none in the CSS file the javascript does not seem to have any effect. I have also tried changing the background color instead of the display property, and that works. I have the code running here (just press the edit link). I really thank you for taking the time to look into this.

    Read the article

  • How to Use Windsor without Property Injection

    - by Grandpappy
    I am attempting to use the WindsorContainer, but I need to turn off Property Injection for the entire container. Here's the code I was trying, but it doesn't seem to have an effect. this.Container = new WindsorContainer(new XmlInterpreter(new ConfigResource("Dependencies"))); this.Container.Kernel.ComponentModelBuilder.RemoveContributor( this.Container.Kernel.ComponentModelBuilder.Contributors.OfType<Castle.MicroKernel.ModelBuilder.Inspectors.PropertiesDependenciesModelInspector>().Single() ); I'd rather not use the Attribute [DoNotWire] on my properties because I don't want my application to have to know it's running with Windsor. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Get the full URI from the href property of a link

    - by Savageman
    Hello SO, I would like to have a confirmation on some point. My goal is to always get the same string (which is the URI in my case) while reading the href property from a link. Example: <a href="test.htm" /> with base_url = http://domain.name/ <a href="../test.htm" /> with base_url = http://domain.name/domain/ <a href="http://domain.name/test.htm" /> with base_url = any folder from http://domain.name/ I need to get http://domain.name/test.htm from the 3 situations above (or any other identical string). After some tests, it appears that my_a_dom_node.href always return the full-qualified URI, including the http://domaine.name, which should be okay for what I want. jQuery has a different behaviour and $(my_a_dom_node).attr('href') returns the content (text) that appears inside the HTML. So my trick is to use $(my_a_dom_node).get(0).href to get the full URI. The question is: can I rely on this?

    Read the article

  • Using VRaptor3 with Tomcat UnpackWARs property setted to false

    - by VinTem
    Hi there, I have to deploy my web app to a tomcat container with the unpackWARs property defined to false. When I do that, although the application is successfully deployed, when I try to access my url I always got a 404 error. I just don't receive that error when I try to access a direct file like index.html for instance. But I can't do that, the VRaptor framework is responsible for routing my url to the jsp file. Does anyone know if I have do anything else? Thanx

    Read the article

  • Software patents in US/Europe? [closed]

    - by WeNeedAnswers
    I don't quite understand how the patent system works in the US and in much respect to Europe. I have heard that a pattern of operation can be patented. what are the implications, has anyone been taken to court yet over a software patent based on pattern of usage. I have seen the cases with nokia, palm and Apple. If I write something based on these patterns of operation, will I need a licence?

    Read the article

  • WPF: Bind/Apply Filter on Boolean Property

    - by Julian Lettner
    I want to apply a filter to a ListBox accordingly to the IsSelected property of a CheckBox. At the moment I have something like this. XAML <CheckBox Name="_filterCheckBox" Content="Filter list" Checked="ApplyFilterHandler"/> <ListBox ItemsSource="{Binding SomeItems}" /> CodeBehind public ObservableCollection<string> SomeItems { get; private set; } private void ApplyFilterHandler(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) { if (_filterCheckBox.IsChecked.Value) CollectionViewSource.GetDefaultView(SomeItems).Filter += MyFilter; else CollectionViewSource.GetDefaultView(SomeItems).Filter -= MyFilter; } private bool MyFilter(object obj) { return ... } It works but this solution feels like the old-fashioned way (Windows Forms). Question: Is it possible to achieve this with Bindings / in XAML? Thanks for your time.

    Read the article

  • Cannot read property 'onPageChanged' of undefined

    - by user3522749
    sample extension background.js code chrome.runtime.onInstalled.addListener(function() { chrome.declarativeContent.onPageChanged.removeRules(undefined, function() { chrome.declarativeContent.onPageChanged.addRules([{ conditions: [ // When a page contains a <video> tag... new chrome.declarativeContent.PageStateMatcher({ pageUrl: { hostEquals: 'www.youtube.com'} }) ], // ... show the page action. actions: [new chrome.declarativeContent.ShowPageAction() ] }]); }); }); and I got Cannot read property 'onPageChanged' of undefined in console. No problem running the code, why is that happening?

    Read the article

  • React to change on a static property

    - by Stiggler
    I'm re-writing an MXML item renderer in pure AS. A problem I can't seem to get past is how to have each item renderer react to a change on a static property on the item renderer class. In the MXML version, I have the following binding set up on the item renderer: instanceProperty={callInstanceFunction(ItemRenderer.staticProperty)} What would be the equivalent way of setting this up in AS (using BindingUtils, I assume)? UPDATE: So I thought the following wasn't working, but it appears as if Flex is suppressing errors thrown in the instanceFunction, making it appear as if the binding itself is bad. BindingUtils.bindSetter(instanceFunction, ItemRenderer, "staticProperty"); However, when instanceFunction is called, already initialized variables on the given instance are all null, which was the cause of the errors referenced above. Any ideas why this is?

    Read the article

  • Setting a VCProject property to default

    - by Ofek Shilon
    I'm trying some VS2005 IDE macros to modify a large amount of projects (~80) within a solution. Some of the properties I wish to set do expose a programmatic interface to 'default', but many others do not. Is there a generic way to set such properties to their default? (eventually meaning erasing them from the .vcproj file) Simplified example, setting some random properties: Sub SetSomeProps() Dim prj As VCProject Dim cfg As VCConfiguration Dim toolCompiler As VCCLCompilerTool Dim toolLinker As VCLinkerTool Dim EnvPrj As EnvDTE.Project For Each EnvPrj In DTE.Solution.Projects prj = EnvPrj.Object cfg = prj.Configurations.Item(1) toolLinker = cfg.Tools("VCLinkerTool") If toolLinker IsNot Nothing Then ' Some tool props that expose a *default* interface' toolLinker.EnableCOMDATFolding = optFoldingType.optFoldingDefault toolLinker.OptimizeReferences = optRefType.optReferencesDefault toolLinker.OptimizeForWindows98 = optWin98Type.optWin98Default End If toolCompiler = cfg.Tools("VCCLCompilerTool") If toolCompiler IsNot Nothing Then ' How to set it to default? (*erase* the property from the .vcproj)' toolCompiler.CallingConvention = callingConventionOption.callConventionCDecl toolCompiler.WholeProgramOptimization = False toolCompiler.Detect64BitPortabilityProblems = False End If Next End Sub Any advice would be appreciated.

    Read the article

  • DataGridRow Cells property

    - by Michal Krawiec
    I would like to get to DataGridRow Cells property. It's a table of cells in a current DataGrid. But I cannot get access direct from code nor by Reflection: var x = dataGridRow.GetType().GetProperty("Cells") //returns null Is there any way to get this table? And related question - in Watch window (VS2008) regular properties have an icon of a hand pointing on a sheet of paper. But DataGridRow.Cells has an icon of a hand pointing on a sheet of paper with a little yellow envelope in a left bottom corner - what does it mean? Thanks for replies.

    Read the article

  • Assigning the Tag Property of a Control in WPF

    - by jmayor
    If I have 7 checkBoxes, one for each day of the week, Can I assing in XAML the Tag property to each one of the the System.DayOfWeek enumeration value? <StackPanel > <StackPanel.Resources> <system:DayOfWeek x:Key="Monday" >Monday</system:DayOfWeek> </StackPanel.Resources> <CheckBox Name="chkMo" Tag="{StaticResource Monday}">Mo</CheckBox> ... </StackPanel> Is there a way to assign directly the enum value to the tag without using resources?

    Read the article

  • Generating a error code per property in Hibernate validator

    - by Mike Q
    Hi all, I am looking at using hibernate validator for a requirement of mine. I want to validate a bean where properties may have multiple validation checks. e.g. class MyValidationBean { @NotNull @Length( min = 5, max = 10 ) private String myProperty; } But if this property fails validation I want a specific error code to be associated with the ConstraintViolation, regardless of whether it failed because of @Required or @Length, although I would like to preserve the error message. class MyValidationBean { @NotNull @Length( min = 5, max = 10 ) @ErrorCode( "1234" ) private String myProperty; } Something like the above would be good but it doesn't have to be structured exactly like that. I can't see a way to do this with hibernate validator. Is it possible? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Why won't Silverlight handle the conversion of my custom float property

    - by Jeff Weber
    In a Silverlight 4 project I have a class that extends Canvas: public class AppendageCanvas : Canvas { public float Friction { get; set; } public float Restitution { get; set; } public float Density { get; set; } } I use this canvas in Blend by dragging it onto another control and setting the custom properties: When I run the app, I get the following error when InitializeComponent is called on the control containing my custom canvas: I'm not sure why Silverlight isn't able to convert this property from it's string representation in Xaml, to the float that it is. Anyone have any ideas?

    Read the article

  • using property file along with config file to be used with mxmlc

    - by whoopy_whale
    Hi, I'm trying to run mxmlc in the following manner. mxmlc -load-config+=mycfg.xml C:\\projects\\src\\main.mxml -output myswf.swf In the config file, I want to keep some values configurable, for example the paths of the external libraries. Is it possible to include a property file into the config file and use it as {property_name} in the config file? Or is it possible to pass certain arguments from the command line itself that will override/replace the corresponding values in the config file, like the -D option in the ant command? Please provide your suggestions.

    Read the article

  • Changing property type in class that implements interface with object type property.

    - by used2could
    I know the title is a bit confusing but bare with me. (I'm up for suggestions on a new title lol) I'm writing a TemplateEngine that will allow me to use my own markup in text based files. I'm wanting to add controls as plugins as the application matures. Currently i've got a structure like the following: interface IControl string Id object Value class Label : IControl string Id string Value class Repeater : IControl string Id List<IControl> Value Now you'll see the strange part right away in the Repeater class with the Value property. I was hoping that having the Value type as object in the interface would allow me the flexibility to expand the controls as i go along. The compiler doesn't like this and for good reason i guess. Does anyone have any suggestions how to accomplish this? Note: Please don't go into suggesting things like use Spark View Engine for templating. There is a reason i'm creating extra work for myself.

    Read the article

  • Code don't work, can't read property 'className' of undefined

    - by Arlen Beiler
    What is wrong with this code? var divarray = []; var articleHTML = []; var absHTML; var keyHTML; var bodyHTML = []; var i = 0; divarray = document.getElementById("yui-main").getElementsByTagName("div"); for ( var j in divarray) { if(divarray[i].className == "articleBody"){ alert("found"); articleHTML = divarray[i]; break; } bodyHTML[i] = ''; if(articleHTML[i].className == "issueMiniFeature"){continue;} if(articleHTML[i].className == "abstract"){absHTML = articleHTML[i]; continue;} if(articleHTML[i].className == "journalKeywords"){keyHTML = articleHTML[i]; continue;} bodyHTML[i] = articleHTML[i]; i++; } The error I get is: TypeError: Cannot read property 'className' of undefined I am using Google Chrome.

    Read the article

  • Setting the initial value of a property when using DataContractSerializer

    - by Eric
    If I am serializing and later deserializing a class using DataContractSerializer how can I control the initial values of properties that were not serialized? Consider the Person class below. Its data contract is set to serialize the FirstName and LastName properties but not the IsNew property. I want IsNew to initialize to TRUE whether a new Person is being instantiate as a new instance or being deserialized from a file. This is easy to do through the constructor, but as I understand it DataContractSerializer does not call the constructor as they could require parameters. [DataContract(Name="Person")] public class Person { [DataMember(Name="FirstName")] public string FirstName { get; set; } [DataMember(Name = "LastName")] public string LastName { get; set; } public bool IsNew { get; set; } public Person(string first, string last) { this.FirstName = first; this.LastName = last; this.IsNew = true; } }

    Read the article

  • Mocking a non-settable child property with Rhino Mocks

    - by Marcus
    I currently have interfaces much like the following: interface IService { void Start(); IHandler ServiceHandler { get; } } interface IHandler { event EventHandler OnMessageReceived; } Using Rhino Mocks, it's easy enough to mock IService, but it doesn't assign any IHandler instance to the ServiceHandler property. Therefore when my method under test adds an event handler to _mockedService.ServiceHandler.OnMessageReceived, I get an 'Object reference not set' error. How can I ensure that ServiceHandler is assigned a value in the mocked IService instance? This is likely Rhino Mocks 101, but I'm just getting up to speed on it...

    Read the article

  • Flash Hates Me. Error #1009: Cannot access a property or method of a null object reference

    - by sol
    I simply create a movie clip, put it on the stage and give it an instance name of char. Here's my document class, simple as can be: public class Test extends MovieClip { public function Test() { char.x = 1315; char.y = 459; addEventListener(Event.ENTER_FRAME, mouseListen); } private function mouseListen(e:Event) { char.x = mouseX; char.y = mouseY; } } And I get this error: TypeError: Error #1009: Cannot access a property or method of a null object reference. at com.me::Test/::mouseListen() How in the world is it possible that it knows what "char" is in the constructor but not in the mouseListen function? What else could it be?

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET Custom Validator Error Message: Control referenced by the property cannot be validated

    - by Jan-Frederik Carl
    Hello, I use ASP.NET and have a Button and a CustomValidator, which has to validate the button. <asp:Button ID="saveButton" runat="server" OnClick="SaveButton_Click" Text="Speichern" CausesValidation="true"/> <asp:CustomValidator runat="server" ID="saveCValidator" Display="Static" OnServerValidate="EditPriceCValidator_ServerValidate" ControlToValidate="saveButton" ErrorMessage=""> When loading the page, I receive the error message: "Control 'saveButton' referenced by the ControlToValidate property of 'saveCValidator' cannot be validated." What might be the problem? I searched on the net, but this didn´t help much.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41  | Next Page >