Search Results

Search found 39207 results on 1569 pages for 'foreign function interfac'.

Page 343/1569 | < Previous Page | 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350  | Next Page >

• SimpleModal and Jquery (How to do open and closing animations)?

  - by matthewsteiner

  http://www.ericmmartin.com/projects/simplemodal/ There's two examples near the bottom of the page that show how to either do open or closing animations. I'm pretty new to jquery. How can I declare both onOpen and onClose? (I've only been able to get one to work at a time. jQuery(function ($) { $('a.basic').click(function (e) { e.preventDefault(); $('#basic-modal-content').modal( { onClose: function (dialog) { dialog.container.fadeOut('slow', function () { }); } } ); }); }); Thanks for any help you can provide.

  Read the article

• Link User32 with gcc

  - by Tim Cooper

  I have a C program which has a function call that is defined in windows.h (which I have included), however, when I try and compile it with gcc, I get the error: warning: implicit declaration of function `LockWorkStation' I looked at the MSDN documentation and I see that this function is the User32 library file, and I was wondering how I would go about linking that to my file.

  Read the article

• AS3: Adding get/set methods to a class via prototype

  - by LiraNuna

  I'm looking for a way to extend a class via prototype by adding a get and set functions. The following code will add a function to the class' prototype: MyClass.prototype.newMethod = function(... args) { }; However I want to add both a get and set functions. I tried: MyClass.prototype.fakeProperty = get function(... args) { }; MyClass.prototype.fakeProperty = set function(... args) { }; But that seem to throw compile errors. Is this even possible? Is there some 'internal' naming convention for get/set functions? I am not looking for answers such as 'create a new class and new get/set functions there'.

  Read the article

• Exceptions thrown in jQuery AJAX callbacks swallowed?

  - by MikeWyatt

  Is there any way to handle exceptions thrown from AJAX callbacks in jQuery, other than adding a try..catch block to each callback? The error function is not called in this situation. $.ajax( { url: 'myurl.rails', success: function( data ) { throw 'Oh no!'; }, error: function ( xhr, textStatus, errorThrown ) { console.log( 'AJAX call failed', xhr, textStatus, errorThrown ); } } );

  Read the article

• jQuery.extend() not giving deep copy of object formed by constructor

  - by two7s_clash

  I'm trying to use this to clone a complicated Object. The object in question has a property that is an array of other Objects, and each of these have properties of different types, mostly primitives, but a couple further Objects and Arrays. For example, an ellipsed version of what I am trying to clone: var asset = new Assets(); function Assets() { this.values = []; this.sectionObj = Section; this.names = getNames; this.titles = getTitles; this.properties = getProperties; ... this.add = addAsset; function AssetObj(assetValues) { this.name = ""; this.title = ""; this.interface = ""; ... this.protected = false; this.standaloneProtected = true; ... this.chaptersFree = []; this.chaptersUnavailable = []; ... this.mediaOptions = { videoWidth: "", videoHeight: "", downloadMedia: true, downloadMediaExt: "zip" ... } this.chaptersAvailable = []; if (typeof assetValues == "undefined") { return; } for (var name in assetValues) { if (typeof assetValues[name] == "undefined") { this[name] = ""; } else { this[name] = assetValues[name]; } } ... function Asset() { return new AssetObj(); } ... function getProperties() { var propertiesArray = new Array(); for (var property in this.values[0]) { propertiesArray.push(property); } return propertiesArray; } ... function addAsset(assetValues) { var newValues; newValues = new AssetObj(assetValues); this.values.push(newValues); } } When I do var copiedAssets = $.extend(true, {}, assets); copiedAssets.values == [], while assets.values == [Object { name="section_intro", more...}, Object { name="select_textbook", more...}, Object { name="quiz", more...}, 11 more...] When I do var copiedAssets = $.extend( {}, assets); all copiedAssets.values.[X].properties are just pointers to the value in assets. What I want is a true deep copy all the way down. What am I missing? Do I need to write a custom extend function? If so, any recommended patterns?

  Read the article

• free public databases with non-trivial table structures?

  - by Caffeine Coma

  I'm looking for some sample database data that I can use for testing and demonstrating a DB tool I am working on. I need a DB that has (preferably) many tables, and many foreign key relationships between the tables. Ideally the data would be in SQL dump format, or at least in something that maintains the foreign key references, and could be easily import into an RDBMS (MySQL or H2). The dataset itself doesn't have to be huge (in fact, best if it's not). I thought about using the Stackoverflow Data Dump, but it's only about 5 tables.

  Read the article

• What can I do about a SQL Server ghost FK constraint?

  - by rcook8601

  I'm having some trouble with a SQL Server 2005 database that seems like it's keeping a ghost constraint around. I've got a script that drops the constraint in question, does some work, and then re-adds the same constraint. Normally, it works fine. Now, however, it can't re-add the constraint because the database says that it already exists, even though the drop worked fine! Here are the queries I'm working with: alter table individual drop constraint INDIVIDUAL_EMP_FK ALTER TABLE INDIVIDUAL ADD CONSTRAINT INDIVIDUAL_EMP_FK FOREIGN KEY (EMPLOYEE_ID) REFERENCES EMPLOYEE After the constraint is dropped, I've made sure that the object really is gone by using the following queries: select object_id('INDIVIDUAL_EMP_FK') select * from sys.foreign_keys where name like 'individual%' Both return no results (or null), but when I try to add the query again, I get: The ALTER TABLE statement conflicted with the FOREIGN KEY constraint "INDIVIDUAL_EMP_FK". Trying to drop it gets me a message that it doesn't exist. Any ideas?

  Read the article

• impress.js Navigation with active class

  - by ArtGoddess

  I would like to use impress.js in order to make a website, with a navigation bar. In each slide, the corresponding anchor or div must have an "active" class, in order to achieve a different link appearance. I have followed all instructions provided here: https://github.com/Ralt/impress.js/commit/f88feb8cae704ce27bd2168bdb77768f516ac2da#L2R605 but the "active" class on the correct menu must be added. This is the code that generates the menu items. How can I add for example the "active" class in the first link? /* ************************ MENU ***************************** */ // Capitalize first letter of string // @see http://stackoverflow.com/a/1026087/851498 var capitalize = function( str ) { return str.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + str.slice(1); } // `showMenu` API function creates the menu // It defines the names of each entry by the id capitalized. var showMenu = function() { // Create the menu wrapper and the element that will be cloned // for each entry. var menu = document.createElement('div'), el = document.createElement('div'); // Apply some classes menu.className = 'menu'; el.className = 'menu-item'; // Create an element that will be the "button" and append it // to the menu var button = document.createElement('div'); button.className = 'menu-button'; button.textContent = 'Menu'; menu.appendChild(button); // Now, for each div in #impress, add an entry to the menu [].forEach.call(byId('impress').firstElementChild.children, function( child, index ) { var newEl = el.cloneNode(), i = index + 1, text = i + '. ' + capitalize(child.id); // Set the text of the new element newEl.textContent = text; // Add an onclick event to the new element // We need to use a closure to make sure the index is correct (function( index ) { newEl.addEventListener('click', function() { goto(index); }); }( index )); // And append the new element to the menu menu.appendChild(newEl); }); // And append the menu to #impress document.body.appendChild(menu); }; Then, in each click it must be removed the active class on the current, and add it to the clicked element. // Remove the active class from the current active document.querySelector( '.active' )[ 0 ].classList.remove( 'active' ); // And add it to the clicked index byId('impress').firstElementChild.children[ index ].classList.add( 'active' ); Where do I have to apply this code? Thank you!

  Read the article

• Can I interrupt javascript code and then continue on a keystroke?

  - by Brian Ramsay

  I am porting an old game from C to Javascript. I have run into an issue with display code where I would like to have the main game code call display methods without having to worry about how those status messages are displayed. In the original code, if the message is too long, the program just waits for the player to toggle through the messages with the spacebar and then continues. This doesn't work in javascript, because while I wait for an event, all of the other program code continues. I had thought to use a callback so that further code can execute when the player hits the designated key, but I can't see how that will be viable with a lot of calls to display.update(msg) scattered throughout the code. Can I architect things differently so the event-based, asynchronous model works, or is there some other solution that would allow me to implement a more traditional event loop? Am I making sense? Example: // this is what the original code does, but obviously doesn't work in Javascript display = { update : function(msg) { // if msg is too long // wait for user input // ok, we've got input, continue } }; // this is more javascript-y... display = { update : function(msg, when_finished) { // show part of the message $(document).addEvent('keydown', function(e) { // display the rest of the message when_finished(); }); } }; // but makes for amazingly nasty game code do_something(param, function() { // in case do_something calls display I have to // provide a callback for everything afterwards // this happens next, but what if do_the_next_thing needs to call display? // I have to wait again do_the_next_thing(param, function() { // now I have to do this again, ad infinitum } }

  Read the article

• Visual Basic: passing arrays between Functions???

  - by SteveNeedsSheetNames

  I have a visual basic function with a ParamArray output, and I want that output to be available to another function, without having to put it on a worksheet just to pick it into that second function. Is there a way to transfer arrays between functions in visual basic? Thanks in advance for your response.

  Read the article

• i am getting error like mysql_connect() acces denied for system@localhost(using password NO)

  - by user309381

  class MySQLDatabase { public $connection; function _construct() { $this->open_connection();} public function open_connection() {$this->connection = mysql_connect(DB_SERVER,DB_USER,DB_PASS); if(!$this->connection){die("Database Connection Failed" . mysql_error());} else{$db_select = mysql_select_db(DB_NAME,$this->connection); if(!$db_select){die("Database Selection Failed" . mysql_error()); } }} public function close_connection({ if(isset($this->connection)){ mysql_close($this->connection); unset($this->connection);}} public function query(/*$sql*/){ $sql = "SELECT*FROM users where id = 1"; $result = mysql_query($sql); $this->confirm_query($result); //return $result;while( $found_user = mysql_fetch_assoc($result)) { echo $found_user ['username']; } } private function confirm_query($result) { if(!$result) { die("The Query has problem" . mysql_error()); } } } $database = new MySQLDatabase(); $database->open_connection(); $database->query(); $database->close_connection(); ?>

  Read the article

• Is there a programming language that performs currying when named parameters are omitted?

  - by Adam Gent

  Many functional programming languages have support for curried parameters. To support currying functions the parameters to the function are essentially a tuple where the last parameter can be omitted making a new function requiring a smaller tuple. I'm thinking of designing a language that always uses records (aka named parameters) for function parameters. Thus simple math functions in my make believe language would be: add { left : num, right : num } = ... minus { left : num, right : num } = .. You can pass in any record to those functions so long as they have those two named parameters (they can have more just "left" and "right"). If they have only one of the named parameter it creates a new function: minus5 :: { left : num } -> num minus5 = minus { right : 5 } I borrow some of haskell's notation for above. Has any one seen a language that does this?

  Read the article

• emacs windows, distribute the width through the frame

  - by Gauthier

  I used once a very nice emacs function that set all my windows (emacs windows, not frames) width evenly. If you open emacs and do C-x 3 twice in a row, you get three vertical windows. Then running the function I am looking for makes the width of these windows the same. I can't for the life of me find this function again. Wouldn't someone help me to: find the name of the function give me the keyboard shortcut if any tell me what I should have done to find the answer by myself Thanks!

  Read the article

• SQLServer triggers

  - by Evl-ntnt

  Please help me to write trigger that, adds new rows in table I have 3 tables in my database. 1) Regions (id, name); id - primary 2) Technics (id, name); id - primary 3) Availability (id, region, technic, count); id - primary, region - foreign on Regions.id, Technik - foreign on technics.id I want to add new row in Availability for each Technics row on adding row in Regions. Somethink like: procedure void OnAddNewRegion(int region) { foreach (Row r in Technic) { Availability.Rows.Add(new Row(id, region, r.Id, 0)); } } But in SQL trigger. Same I want to do on the adding new Technics row

  Read the article

• javascript: execute a bunch of asynchronous method with one callback

  - by Samuel Michelot

  I need to execute a bunch of asynchronous methods (client SQLite database), and call only one final callback. Of course, the ugly way is: execAll : function(callBack) { asynch1(function() { asynch2(function() { ... asynchN(function() { callBack(); }) }) }); } But I know there are better ways to do it. Intuitively I would detect when all call back has been called with a counter to call the final callback. I think this is a common design-pattern, so if someone could point me in the right direction... Thanks in advance !

  Read the article

• jQuery autocomplete works with a local string but not when the same String is called off the server

  - by Ankur

  This is related to the question I asked at http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2802948/how-to-make-an-ajax-call-immediately-on-document-loading My code is: $(document).ready(function(){ $.ajax({ type: "GET", url: "../AutoComplete", success: function(data) { var dataArray = data; alert(dataArray); $("#example").autocomplete(dataArray); } }); }); The value that is printed in the alert is: "Manuscript|Text|Information Object|Basketball|Ball|Sporting Equipment|Tarantula|Spider|Australian Spider|Cricket Player|Medieval Artefact|Person|Sportsperson|Leonardo Da Vinci|Country|Language|Inventor|Priest|Electronics Manufacturer|Object|letter|Artefact|governance model|Organism|Animal".split("|"); If instead I do this: $(document).ready(function(){ $.ajax({ type: "GET", url: "../AutoComplete", success: function(data) { var dataArray = "Manuscript|Text|Information Object|Basketball|Ball|Sporting Equipment|Tarantula|Spider|Australian Spider|Cricket Player|Medieval Artefact|Person|Sportsperson|Leonardo Da Vinci|Country|Language|Inventor|Priest|Electronics Manufacturer|Object|letter|Artefact|governance model|Organism|Animal".split("|"); alert(dataArray); $("#example").autocomplete(dataArray); } }); }); It works fine?

  Read the article

• jquery script that used to work is not working with jquery 1.4.2

  - by Zayatzz

  ... and i cant figure out why. The script is following: <script type="text/javascript" src="http://path/to/js/jquery-1.4.2.min.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> function openMediaPlayer() { $('#flashMovie').animate({'height':'333px'}); } function closeMediaPlayer() { $('#flashMovie').animate({'height':'80px'}); } jQuery(function($){ $('#videoholder').bind('mouseenter', function(){ openMediaPlayer(); }); $('#videoholder').bind('mouseleave', function(){ closeMediaPlayer(); }); }); </script> <div id="videoholder" style="height:80px;width:412px;"> <object width="412" height="80" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" id="flashMovie" name="flashMovie" style="height: 80px;" data="http://path/to/Player.swf"><param name="menu" value="false"><param name="bgcolor" value="#666666"><param name="allowFullscreen" value="true"><param name="flashvars" value="playlistURL=http://path/to/Player/data/playlist.xml"></object> </div> pure and simple resizing flash object. It worked with older(1.3.2) jquery verision. The animate just does not work. Can anyone tell me what i should change to get it working again? Alan.

  Read the article

• checkbox update the record using jquery?

  - by python

  <? include("connect.php"); $sql="select * from sampledb"; $res=mysql_query($sql) or die("query failed"); ?> <script type="text/javascript" src="scripts/jquery.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> function updateCheckVal() { var valcheck = []; $('#checkbox :checked').each(function() { valcheck.push($(this).val()); }); $('#store_checkbox').val(valcheck) } $(function() { $('#checkbox input').click(updateCheckVal); updateCheckVal(); }); $(function(){ $("a.modify").click(function(){ var val = []; $(':checkbox:checked').each(function(i){ val[i] = $(this).val(); }); $("#deleted_id").val(val); page=$(this).attr("href"); $("#Formcontent").html("loading...").load(page); return false; }); }); </script <form name=""> <table width="100%" border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1"> <thead> <tr bgcolor="#CCCCCC"> <th></th> <th>ID</th> <th>Fullname</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <? while($row=mysql_fetch_assoc($res)){?> <tr> <td id="checkbox"><input type="checkbox" name="chk[]" class="chk" value=<?php echo $row["student_id"];?> ></td> <td><?php echo $row["id"];?></td> <td><?php echo $row["fullname"];?></td> </tr> <? }?> </tbody> </table> <input type="hidden" name="store_checkbox" id="store_checkbox" value=""> <a href="formstudent.php?action=update&id=<?php echo $_POST["store_checkbox"]; ?>" class="modify">modify</a> I want to pass the checkbox value that is checked in something like this: example :formstudent.php?action=update&id=1, I am doing here is pass like this but does not work. <a href="formstudent.php?action=update&id=<?php echo $_POST["store_checkbox"]; ?>" Anybody know how to do this?

  Read the article

• Cannot get xmlhttprequest.responseText from JQuery

  - by Felix Guerrero

  Hi. I got this function function verify_at_bd(){ var u = "foo"; var p = "bar"; return $.post('auth.php', { name: u, password: p, mobile: '' }, function(result){ return result; },'json'); } If I do a console.log(verify_at_bd()) I'm getting an xmlhttprequest but cannot access to responseText property. I'm using header("Content-Type: application/json") into my PHP. I'm using firefox 3.6 on OS X.

  Read the article

• Resolve php endless recursion issue

  - by Matt

  Hey all, I'm currently running into an endless recursion situation. I'm implementing a message service that calls various object methods.. it's quite similar to observer pattern.. Here's whats going on: Dispatcher.php class Dispatcher { ... public function message($name, $method) { // Find the object based on the name $object = $this->findObjectByName($name); // Slight psuedocode.. for ease of example if($this->not_initialized($object)) $object = new $object(); // This is where it locks up. } return $object->$method(); ... } class A { function __construct() { $Dispatcher->message("B", "getName"); } public function getName() { return "Class A"; } } class B { function __construct() { // Assume $Dispatcher is the classes $Dispatcher->message("A", "getName"); } public function getName() { return "Class B"; } } It locks up when neither object is initialized. It just goes back and forth from message each other and no one can be initialized. I'm looking for some kind of queue implementation that will make messages wait for each other.. One where the return values still get set. I'm looking to have as little boilerplate code in class A and class B as possible Any help would be immensely helpful.. Thanks! Matt Mueller

  Read the article

• jquery timout funcation not work properly

  - by 3gwebtrain

  HI, i ma using the settimeout function to display block and append to 'li', once the mouseover. and i just want to remove the block and make it none. in my funcation works fine. but problem is even just my mouse cross the li, it self the block getting visibile. how to avoid this? my code is: var thisLi; var storedTimeoutID; $("ul.redwood-user li,ul.user-list li").live("mouseover", function(){ thisLi = $(this); var needShow = thisLi.children('a.copier-link'); if($(needShow).is(':hidden')){ storedTimeoutID = setTimeout(function(){$(thisLi).children('a.copier-link').appendTo(thisLi).show();},3000); } else{ storedTimeoutID = setTimeout(function(){$(thisLi).siblings().children('a.copier-link').appendTo(thisLi).show();},3000); } }); $("ul.redwood-user li,ul.user-list li").live("mouseleave", function(){ clearTimeout(storedTimeoutID); //$('ul.redwood-user li').children('a.copier-link').hide(); $('ul.user-list li').children('a.copier-link').hide(); });

  Read the article

• How to develop a Jquery plugin to find the first child that match with a selector?

  - by Ivan

  I'm trying to make a Jquery plugin (findFirst()) to find the first child with a given characteristics (something in the middle of the find() and children() functions. For instance, given this markup: <div id="start"> <div> <span>Hello world</span> <ul class="valid-result"> ... </ul> <ul class="valid-result"> <li> <ul class="not-a-result"> ... </ul> </li> </ul> <div> <ul class="valid-result"> ... </ul> </div> </div> </div> If you ask for $("#start").findFirst('ul') it should return all ul lists that I have tagged with the valid-result class, but not the ul with class not-a-result. It is, this function has to find the first elements that matches with a given selector, but not the inner elements that match this selector. This is the first time I try to code a Jquery function, and what I've already read doesn't helps me too much with this. The function I have developed is this: jQuery.fn.findFirst = function (sel) { return this.map(function() { return $(this).children().map(function() { if ($(this).is(sel)) { return $(this); } else { return $(this).findFirst(sel); } }); }); } It works in the sense it tries to return the expected result, but the format it returns the result is very rare for me. I suppose the problem is something I don't understand about Jquery. Here you have the JFiddle where I'm testing. EDIT The expected result after $("#start").findFirst('ul') is a set with all UL that have the class 'valid-result' BUT it's not possible to use this class because it doesn't exist in a real case (it's just to try to explain the result). This is not equivalent to first(), because first returns only one element!

  Read the article

• Modify the server side functions using jquery

  - by ant

  Hi, I am developing one website using cakephp and jquery technologies. Server-side there are some functions which handles sql queris. As per requirement I want to modify server side functions on client side using jquery AJAX call. E.g. : Below is the function on server side to modify users information. function modifyUser(username,userid) { //update query statements } Then jquery AJAX call will be like this : $.ajax({ url: 'users/modiyUser', success: function() { alert("Updation done") or any statements. } }); and I want to modify above i.e. server side function depending upon client input criteria. $.ajax({ function users/modiyUser(username,userid) { // I will write here any other statements which gives me some other output. } }); Above AJAX call syntax may not present, but i think you all understood what I am trying to do I simply wants to modify/override server side functions on client side. Please let me know is there any way to resolve above mentioned requirement. Thanks in adavance

  Read the article

• JavaScript in multiple files

  - by vijay.shad

  Hi, I Have created two JavaScript files.One file is "validators.js" and other is "UserValidations.js". Here is the code for validators.js function isBlankString(value) { if (value.replace(/\s/g, "") == "") { return true; } else { return false; } } In other js file I have defined function for validating user name like this. function validateUsername(element) { var username = element.value; if(value.replace(/\s/g, "") == ""){ //nothing to validate return; }else{ //validation logic } } Now as it is obvious i should have used isBlankString(value) method to check string length. But I am clue less about how can i use the function defined in other file?

  Read the article

• Combining multiple jQuery functions

  - by Mark

  Is there any way to combine all of this to reduce the amount of js? This is just an example of some of the jquery dialogs I have in my site, there are a few more too. Thanks. //initiate Search refinement dialog here $("#chooseMoreCnt, #chooseMoreCat, #chooseMorePr").dialog({ bgiframe: true, autoOpen: false, width: 500, modal: true, open: function(type, data) { $(this).parent().appendTo(jQuery("form:first")); } }); //trigger country dialog $('a.chooseMoreCnt').click(function() { $('#chooseMoreCnt').dialog('open'); return false; }); //trigger category dialog $('a.chooseMoreCat').click(function() { $('#chooseMoreCat').dialog('open'); return false; }); //trigger price dialog $('a.chooseMorePr').click(function() { $('#chooseMorePr').dialog('open'); return false; });

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350  | Next Page >