Search Results

Search found 36186 results on 1448 pages for 'sql 11'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 348/1448 | < Previous Page | 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355  | Next Page >

  • Group by SQL with count

    - by snorlaks
    Lets say we have got rows like that: MyTable ID Name Product 1 Adam x 2 Adam y 3 Adam z 4 Peter a 5 Peter b Using query like: Select Name, Count(Product) from MyTable group by Name results will be: Adam 3 Peter 2 But I would like results like: 1 Adam x 3 2 Adam y 3 3 Adam z 3 4 Peter a 2 5 Peter b 2 I hope Ypu know what I mean Could You help me with that query, thanks for help, Bye

    Read the article

  • SQL Oracle LEFT JOIN and SUBQUERY error: ORA-00905: missing keyword

    - by Curro
    Hello everyone. Asking for your help on this Oracle query. It's giving me the error 2 "ORA-00905: missing keyword". It was working fine before I added the LEFT JOIN statement. Obviously it won't deliver the information as we need it without the LEFT JOIN statement. Please provide any help to know which keyword is missing in this query Thanks a lot!: DB Tables: DW.TICKETS DW.TICKET_ACTLOG Subquery table: TABLE_RESOLVERS SELECT TO_CHAR(DW.TICKETS.RESOLVED_TIMESTAMP,'YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS') AS RESOLVED_DATE, DW.TICKETS.SUBJECT, DW.TICKETS.OWNER_CORE_ID, DW.TICKETS.TICKET_NUMBER, TABLE_RESOLVERS.SUBMITTER AS RESOLVER_CORE_ID FROM DW.TICKETS LEFT JOIN (SELECT TICKET_NUMBER, SUBMITTER FROM DW.TICKET_ACTLOG WHERE TYPE = 'Final Resolution' AND (SUBMITTER = 'B02666' OR SUBMITTER = 'R66604') ORDER BY CREATE_TIMESTAMP DESC ) AS TABLE_RESOLVERS ON DW.TICKETS.TICKET_NUMBER = TABLE_RESOLVERS.TICKET_NUMBER WHERE DW.TICKETS.RESOLVED_TIMESTAMP >= to_date('05-03-2010','dd-mm-yyyy') AND DW.TICKETS.RESOLVED_TIMESTAMP < to_date('8-03-2010','dd-mm-yyyy') AND DW.TICKETS.TICKET_NUMBER LIKE 'TCK%' AND DW.TICKETS.TICKET_NUMBER IN (SELECT TICKET_NUMBER FROM DW.TICKET_ACTLOG WHERE (SUBMITTER = 'B02666' OR SUBMITTER = 'R66604') ) ORDER BY DW.TICKETS.CREATE_TIMESTAMP ASC

    Read the article

  • SQL Stored Procedure: Business Hours

    - by Jacob
    How can I create a stored procedure that accepts a start and end date.(e.g April 1 - April 30 1.) Get the business days including Saturdays x (a value). Plus 2.) Get Holidays x (a value) and return the total. I'm new to this, I guess it would be a tsql function. hmm. any help would be appreciated. Thanks

    Read the article

  • HTML text input and using the input as a variable in a script(tcl)/sql(sqlite)

    - by Fantastic Fourier
    Hello all, I'm very VERY new at this whole web thing. And I'm just very confused in general. Basically, what I want to do is take an input via text using HTML and adding that input to database, table trans. Should be simple but I am lost. <li>Transaction Number</li> <li><input type=|text| name=|tnumber| </li> // do i need to use value? <li>Employee Name</li> <li><input type=|text| name=|ename| </li> <li><input type=|SUBMIT| value=|Add|></li> ...... ...... sqlite3 db $::env(ROOT)/database.db mb eval {INSERT INTO trans VALUES ($tnumber, $ename} mb close They are both in a same file and there are only two fields to the database to keep things simple. What I can see here is that tnumber and ename aren't declared as variables. So how do I do that so that the text input is assigned to respective variables?

    Read the article

  • SQL Server giving a weird conversion error

    - by codingguy3000
    Hello Everyone I'm stuck and any help you can give me is greatly appreciated. create table stackoverflow_rules(myguid uniqueidentifier primary key, myvarchar50 varchar(50)) insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('27C4CF31-2C4C-4C78-BBDC-2D0FDAA891CF','9985276') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('6F865BBD-1D79-4931-BCFE-71AD7A14B145','9985275') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('C91124D9-CE83-44C6-A979-427858BBCDCE','9985274') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('18D89F3C-D15D-4A27-9695-CE4417A9D752','9985273') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('40C9A127-D50D-440C-A6BF-A3C292B56121','9985272') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('3191CE74-6443-4DF0-ABFB-4083150E27A7','9985271') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('489606B3-8EE8-4308-BD3B-660FEC999B84','9985270') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('7FB986D6-7ACF-4453-B124-E688514D3A84','9985269') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('2E1662CB-FBC2-418A-9FFD-453895EE6FA4','9985268') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('6180E683-AA19-4B5D-9AA1-370B9AA8C156','9985267') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('39BDD429-4C49-4351-951F-016B89E700D0','9985267') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('9A09CF26-B168-48D2-9178-EBBD6C0BA5F4','9985267') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('56BA06A7-71F6-4AC2-817A-69A3E800BE54','9985266') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('35D8C2FE-4793-40BC-AECA-10AA722866AE','9985265') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('84162588-D2A2-4B67-869D-2D7A0CB3ABEC','9985264') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('05A8BE08-B0CF-4ADC-A901-2DB6B70713DA','9985263') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('11E1B3F5-5EC0-43BF-B868-B30BCC5F97B3','9985262') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('D48875E9-4A2B-4A5E-8C3A-6788ADD2E44E','9985261') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('5C29D799-5F86-4B5D-8B31-1AFB9E289417','9985260') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('3FAF4D60-F06A-4754-A26F-61DE6A121E9E','9985259') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('4F001BF6-BF60-4F40-AAE1-32CD707E87F8','9985258') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('56A91F39-F9D2-438C-A424-F26ED799F723','9985258') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('F55F72CA-0C2B-4DE7-B725-C9521CD57B23','9985257') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('364808A7-46E6-4639-A14D-6A350A56D2A0','9985256') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('68FA5B18-BBE3-4F1F-A9DE-D46853AD5D4A','9985255') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('B0118D37-807A-4D29-9B56-790F3D810C64','9985254') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('E998F33E-F05A-4C49-8CC2-B90BCFA9AE0E','9985253') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('A0531477-335C-4A7D-A1E7-1DAD54ECB7AD','9985252') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('96540D09-BA49-413B-9FD6-228DF524BE1A','9985251') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('23CD3C18-DAE2-463B-B27C-977488DF9C5F','9985251') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('8BF4AE7D-0AF0-47F9-9388-A2D4CA4C3160','9985250') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('E1892F4D-471C-4A49-8D68-F9F1E6E9C275','9985249') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('641A62CC-1DEE-4DFD-BC9A-DD47D7C45B18','9985248') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('3AF2F7CA-489D-4A79-A6F5-DB5578F381D0','9985247') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('939B3773-BE13-483C-A27F-5594A23AB6F2','9985247') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('81A5FD90-1E2D-4DB5-A10F-5624A576D566','9985247') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('E87109DD-7283-4B60-AB7F-F9A3DD384E52','9985247') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('689A789F-0FFC-45AE-87DF-66C5130338E2','9985246') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('4A9D3A2D-940B-4D45-8234-A1C98FF8A2FB','9985246') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('75073565-E623-40FC-AEF3-81620F2514A8','9985245') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('DB583FF8-1635-47C1-8241-D37C015C7642','9985244') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('39EA148B-55D1-4878-925A-39FA8592F451','9985243') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('BF1CE2D7-ABD3-460B-A7DC-BD0E2B2A5388','9985242') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('B6431717-26F0-436E-9DCC-C0C5240AC329','9985242') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('4F22E672-6F3D-454C-ABA7-D9B84D12DDE0','9985241') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('0436E893-DC43-4FF7-8BDC-BD0BF9E9A55D','9985240') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('60B2FE73-3575-4047-B324-63620FEACD6B','9985239') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('2041E1E5-F60F-4494-A000-F349F49662EC','9985238') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('B89636C8-4648-4058-8DC6-95DCE468CA63','9985237') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('4EC1B486-1E9C-4B41-94C1-5B24471BAD3D','9985236') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('4C86120E-1A27-4F59-948B-F11D8ACD498E','9985234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('E8A1EA7A-5337-4769-9D23-25F7BFB589AF','9985217') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('6E7982F0-5899-4214-A05A-262E05A540CB','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('C55B838F-FD63-40E9-97AF-25E02A37ABB7','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('95296596-ED86-4A88-8C46-27CF79D4AFB9','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('149BC6CC-857C-4CD7-B374-29EE6382CFCF','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('5D3E88FC-1DB5-4BAF-A16B-29F2A2C7D997','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('1FDB6AD4-3860-411E-A247-22B9D00C9053','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('83BD156B-C5ED-460E-95F0-21E8B4254BF8','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('2FD09C37-E224-414D-8C41-220B6528EB9C','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('A46D0B0D-70E2-4AEF-BF30-2244FFA8EF9E','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('824B7F04-51B4-48F6-920A-1FDE8571E32F','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('79DD6034-A9DC-4AC1-9CD3-338F0521AC99','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('BFD35E07-C5DE-4C8B-ADC4-36069655F450','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('D655AD53-8107-481B-A1C9-340A7B31EFB6','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('7E6FF0E9-E1F4-4522-AB91-1A64C2AC0E3A','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('3A977BFE-17F6-46FA-8568-1A8ED2F48483','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('D95A941D-DEB3-46B5-8B2B-1AC9741824ED','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('55528060-12AE-4C2E-A4A1-11E40881DEAE','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('E99B4179-DE6E-4FCB-B7B9-165C05A94424','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('20D2D92B-E45A-4883-A114-109C41E2F278','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('7161CC4A-0B3E-4B97-A973-0C5A7F26CC0D','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('5E267539-8412-4423-A82C-0C74C995D561','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('AE173244-38CD-4B8D-A1CB-0DC112AC6F54','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('3ED8BF74-D0D1-4D11-92B3-008F11E34308','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('6F77EAF9-0520-495A-ADB5-027F611E418D','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('34DAFFBC-0733-4EC0-8607-0287DA5929D6','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('5266FB2F-2829-4C60-91E7-00D9A0832B8E','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('A1EC9933-92F0-4805-93C2-071F503BE816','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('EC19E064-940A-4EEA-9A12-07D2A0680C03','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('7CA5F400-0E57-4A86-B4E1-094720E98B56','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('3A7F95B9-79B6-4323-B390-5B30AE23F66C','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('CCA677CB-8889-40E6-8FDC-54C33DCBAD93','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('345FACAF-90B2-4B2D-B6CF-577F242F28C9','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('20531AFD-21EB-4B75-B50C-5FEABDAE29DB','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('A8FF5B5F-7976-43FE-B013-67CEE5F07710','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('AEF6E39A-6CC2-48E8-9999-65D7CD103A45','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('8AB565EE-4A53-40B9-9D95-66034FD72B6D','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('B0DAC1F6-B7E0-476F-8543-6282203A72C7','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('DACE56ED-5964-44FD-9E35-68E3B409B2D7','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('C64F5A8A-1930-4824-9F0E-68EF848F2F86','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('38817195-BDB0-44AC-988D-690BE9E50FD0','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('BF4202D8-A23A-48DB-8799-694578EED45A','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('D26A3E39-EEA2-4928-82F9-676B3F901021','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('0D3F16C2-237A-4461-9851-6B0555EDADCE','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('F8CCEE52-A31D-4B6D-9F9F-6D53BE7EB919','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('BCE3146A-AACE-4CF5-ADF1-3D5E57827D96','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('5D6E4347-ABC8-4892-89EC-3FE666A8523B','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('8BD465A9-DC91-4960-BCC7-42EAEE51024A','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('54FCE80F-F551-4548-BCE2-4499AB66D93F','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('843C8651-A95D-458F-A6E7-488F5978FB56','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('4BE7BC8D-BC97-4F8F-85BB-48CC970B9465','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('6C611A14-11CC-454D-A9C8-48CF0B2776A9','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('50819781-F028-4976-A406-45D88804C566','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('1EE5DBE0-0EA3-4F9B-8C78-469D00888892','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('33B87A5D-CB69-4BD2-BEC8-4D90D6A21232','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('C31D7CD1-E9BA-4B03-BB11-4DE7022A45AD','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('2E1FC057-4C57-4C27-86E4-4EC887B77ABE','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('7811CF7B-2935-47A6-92CB-520C4E0AEC4A','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('2DAB5B2D-3D94-4F47-B7F5-536FAF08BCC6','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('2F405742-CF20-4995-84D3-976B108DBB99','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('2852C9C8-325D-4C82-837E-9D6E751B794F','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('40E87A07-DA9B-4277-90BB-8FA994470CB1','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('732DF392-C8D6-4EEF-B046-8FC6C0DB4DEC','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('AA55681E-FE4A-46E9-8809-928941C165AD','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('C146FDD8-EF42-48B4-A357-90CEE93FE902','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('A0FEAAAD-8B44-4797-BD1F-A34AC872EC39','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('A45F22EE-8740-4A3B-ABB5-A8F7EE32B107','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('1A073622-C5D6-41B0-BCC2-8220ED1978BA','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('C7CFCCDC-5ADF-4BCF-BBE4-7E6D611B96CC','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('A618A9A7-5DAC-4658-9B6F-7FC091C49122','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('0F698448-929F-4E3B-A6B1-810BF66DC9AD','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('2FD04ED9-AC24-4E80-8902-7AF2351DAB7B','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('2DA5D721-DFDD-4E96-9A5C-7DF7B0FA9ABB','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('76816CF3-FB2E-440D-91E7-7FF179CE2702','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('228A8BC4-D136-4FDA-B006-84FD69D583A0','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('838DCC6F-0C37-4144-9461-892F1DE2A0D4','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('E65DF83F-FDA5-4883-9E29-8CAB66297328','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('621547A3-613E-4CB7-9537-8D1FF987ADC7','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('2ABB681F-5258-4DF3-A0B8-89962ADDBCB8','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('F54E5C88-17FA-407C-B457-8B69077748E9','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('63D66460-3834-4873-9BD4-74148EC300F4','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('14A19194-457F-40D3-B08E-715EF830FD75','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('75CF2565-D36A-46F6-935E-BFD82144B8A2','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('EDA93745-2009-41F6-B01F-C3F9930C0F67','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('20CFC7EE-7188-49F0-BDEB-C0CAF3610F2C','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('ED6EDD00-2151-4CA7-9F22-BF6DE74B0622','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('EC8DAC77-E516-4B8E-9FB8-C5A4C963563A','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('C6FDECC9-24BE-4AA0-B33C-C9195DC630B0','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('BD9890BA-8F8A-4596-B0F0-BA2F3467E5B4','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('2F496F30-1E08-4174-ABE4-BBE3977268EF','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('2CD7D3D2-77D4-43DE-A44F-B248AAF8891F','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('FFC7E6E7-00E9-41E8-BD11-B0EFD4BA3971','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('B8348F9C-D57F-4561-9981-B14DAEE7257B','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('2CAE1761-8DB0-4D18-8FF6-AD79D44EF699','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('9A241CB7-1FAE-4767-8E13-AF3A66123DC0','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('B836DB33-FB5A-4FF7-A293-D7A29488A6F6','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('23207756-F6E1-406C-AEAC-DFC1710E3E41','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('64ED1587-8791-414F-B2EA-E265584BECE9','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('07442948-0FE7-4EDD-8779-E4808B20852C','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('ACAE3351-3EDF-43E3-8021-E4CBAF20BA55','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('1E96680B-1E92-40F2-AAAE-E4D524206982','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('57A0F1D0-8029-4110-9C2A-D3A2F13E6776','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('D0A76745-1930-4755-90EA-D3CA0240BA6D','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('5379B540-4DCC-4A71-BE19-D1DA4B808A4D','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('B41B60EB-5C83-4CA6-8768-D2226A164FB6','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('31CA2727-7227-4377-B127-D261AA0CD304','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('BD7102BB-FA67-4A33-82C4-D3616ED7CB3F','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('7090FCA6-144A-430B-A609-CDDFB39C4D25','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('382BE0D2-A92A-4D73-B2CE-D640A2BBA523','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('1A4011C0-40C8-4ABD-8ACF-D6D3A220B940','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('53A62E1F-5926-4DEA-A7FB-C99B14A2120D','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('24C84EE0-70DF-4602-B133-F1CB765F2B29','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('B40C80C7-26C0-43F9-9B8A-F2C46A6FD79F','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('8F9FE478-6961-4042-A62D-F464F21BFC46','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('6E9B27D8-C963-4413-ABB5-F31F307F2AE1','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('1CCAB652-042A-4C6F-B89B-ECBFFCA468C6','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('FDA7C815-F4ED-4E6D-AE95-ED18005651EB','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('6D48A842-B5F9-45AA-BC3C-EF74C911E2FC','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('571A48F3-10E2-419C-8E72-EB4B833FA2A2','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('27C54188-4CD7-447D-9C47-E7C7F4A87A47','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('0F8E94BC-1612-4086-A6C1-E883C83758E4','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('24315A1A-CFD9-4984-AF64-F9A79E960D45','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('38602998-8149-4B6A-91EA-F9D4B93810A6','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('1FDB6A11-E422-4EA1-B4AC-FDD1197BB7F3','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('FDDCB1EA-37C9-4833-BDD8-FEFDEEF0A749','9980234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('5241815C-CE10-4C08-BE01-CB2D1012CCF0','9980066') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('D0E5E79E-4502-42F8-B8C6-EDE3D20526B4','9970234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('B173FC5D-BAB3-4942-A904-D9D3BA66A1ED','9960234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('D5C2A2D9-2BA6-4059-896C-B464C8C8CB5F','9960234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('32B865C7-1D67-457A-9550-DFDBCBFB12C6','9951166') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('82F0A99B-0C88-44EB-BE50-265C6C4C1B86','9400000') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('BDE9DC0D-B9A7-4AC9-83D5-8F9ED5F25FDA','9299199') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('2FE2415A-9D51-4AD4-9679-74BDA93DC6A6','9299166') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('4BC3D4FF-5FBB-484E-8BC6-CFE90706E3D2','9299111') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('0FC22F14-A499-4C8C-9E6B-0CF613ACF505','9281266') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('AC6B2795-A9A0-40DF-9BAF-04D4A74F4B9B','9281166') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('DAA73B60-65B9-46B2-B1AC-76A74B621700','9281166') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('D419DCBB-A76E-47DF-A59D-803AFAB770C5','9281166') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('405847E0-4764-4409-81E8-8ECCCAAE94BB','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('76D59559-F986-45EF-9F74-7870D97A377D','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('3F6F78A9-7930-4F76-839F-77304396CBC3','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('2C1A62F2-B783-432B-B83A-6BD8B29EE2DE','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('D371D319-6E88-4286-A46E-6C1905ADD6AC','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('10C42C2E-DC1A-43C4-959C-98D3A798D631','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('215F0003-188D-45C9-85BE-9B3811760CCB','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('4DD2BA43-BA1C-44BE-8C10-996454D63205','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('26D863E7-6F96-42BC-A2BA-99B30D94F6D9','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('625A2793-A60F-4FE7-9BD4-A953877B258D','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('5B5A2538-74E0-4A6F-9929-AA29BA3BDCCE','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('B8597353-0254-42AB-BAF7-AA4DAF195CC8','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('22F392BC-B42C-434F-9E32-AB8DFFC6EA76','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('E703EEE4-82B1-43C0-914F-ABCF3EF53E91','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('09BD6548-7395-4450-A7CA-D0AB0631F222','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('71D737EB-59CA-4685-827D-E17A0B4FA44D','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('F09ACB1E-64B0-4F29-86BF-E323C5347883','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('8A39E85B-8E49-44C1-8B4A-B9D79CC3F97F','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('E3BE436C-0BEC-45CE-9680-AFCE70D59B84','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('915D4F2A-8430-479F-84ED-064A3D6889DA','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('FF6DEFF5-072D-4E14-A6C2-0EF4862CCF28','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('2E7944D1-5A85-4D85-9660-138F30BED95C','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('E449E8A8-1CE4-49DE-898F-1C357777B674','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('65E89A21-5908-4913-840A-28E625F4C003','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('E23175FD-B60E-4FD4-A99A-2DB232BCB6B1','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('A521CC05-21C1-4759-AA00-384014F9C4CB','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('218CE896-8D3F-447B-A504-33428F797CE2','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('D4A3A407-20BF-481D-95DE-2C2BED13FD60','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('B5FCEB1B-3F0D-4DFE-B47D-4D44E88879A1','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('519BB489-1606-4A64-BA49-456DE79FC471','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('837D5167-CE68-4840-9592-432D371EE3AF','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('F140182F-844E-4CA7-BAA1-6A96FA726A93','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('8FB3AE45-3BFF-4DBF-ABAE-61A97EE73F36','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('33D59F0B-DAD6-4608-BF70-F2C49805FF54','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('5BFB5CEC-1322-49B0-A626-EC94092998A3','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('8AB2E1F8-A4F6-48AC-B789-FB1F46A89617','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('CD559FD0-552F-4F54-A638-F86878413D7B','9280666') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('D23AC171-E7E8-4310-B3B5-1253CCA33E5C','9251166') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('0E777743-0C70-4D76-9293-076F9DBC02EB','9251166') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('B0CDE199-9BDF-4CDD-8E32-1384CB8512B4','9200166') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('1F48F171-5179-4EC9-9554-2DA6EF60B9E8','9002266') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('A9168993-F6AF-4F81-A166-441411E72691','9001166') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('25FB4906-2AC8-4A29-B077-C4BC681D3227','9000001') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('02E14983-49E2-4867-B0C2-0BCF9BC3BAB6','8860235') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('53F915DE-1A8A-4A75-A661-0CAB56F39B11','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('834F1EB8-AEA0-435F-81AF-0C212BD54A17','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('797AFF3A-8CB0-4AE8-8430-0ED04A72394B','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('56B83693-3F46-4D8F-93A8-098517C96E94','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('1559018C-71F3-45FC-9642-09DFCC06EA78','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('04A86146-97FC-46C4-B1FE-07E916509908','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('1A3367B3-CB36-40CA-8D7D-02206840089A','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('33626BD1-AED2-4AEF-9289-199F641FDFE0','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('8468E795-71A8-4417-8179-1778FD7E915E','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('9EE6FF40-AAFB-46A8-8655-186515189AB8','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('D314A6A4-BBB5-4499-9EF4-1B37EA9131B6','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('788898AF-48E6-4DA0-BDBB-12871FE81D35','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('34D55FA5-FF82-49B5-A4EF-144999BB1B4F','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('C8FF93B1-EB7C-4711-85BA-14C78B7A27C1','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('54199346-624C-4B1E-8293-14EE9C6EF23B','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('5105C133-9120-4075-9EB6-151569E0719D','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('D03366DB-BC4A-44CC-ABC8-151F627E2A95','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('40EF76A3-2250-4840-90C1-1577AE855EEE','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('8E229744-7528-4727-880A-168331E72ED0','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('10F66C0C-C97B-4A8B-9FAC-160F3AA09A62','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('8173CB1C-A65D-4B89-9BD3-2DC4BA2F4C72','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('1CEAE246-6323-402D-95DB-2AC25DF1FD83','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('BB859D4A-3B1C-40FC-8C74-2BD44902894C','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('A31C45AF-D149-4789-A22D-2FB3E6A17627','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('52F98EEC-D3AC-429C-948F-306FA865EDE7','8860234') insert into stackoverflow_rules(myguid, myvarchar50) values('06E84032-C102-49F4-B544-3169FC1C62F4','8860234') insert into stackoverflo

    Read the article

  • Linq-to-SQL statement issue

    - by Anicho
    I am basically looking to bind a search query to a gridview which is nice, but this must be done by a users input query (sort of like a search function). I can get single values and rows returned, but how would I get it to search all columns in my database for the inputted values and return it? My code so far is: Void SearchFunction() { TiamoDataContext context = new TiamoDataContext(); var search = from p in context.UserProfiles where = p.DanceType == UserSearchString select p; UserSearchGrid.DataSource = search; UserSearchGrid.DataBind(); } I tried p.equals but am pretty sure thats not the way to go about it.

    Read the article

  • Daily Backups for a single table in Microsoft SQL Server

    - by James Horton
    Hello, I have a table in a database that I would like to backup daily, and keep the backups of the last two weeks. It's important that only this single table will be backed up. I couldn't find a way of creating a maintenance plan or a job that will backup a single table, so I thought of creating a stored procedure job that will run the logic I mentioned above by copying rows from my table to a database on a different server, and deleting old rows from that destination database. Unfortunately, I'm not sure if that's even possible. Any ideas how can I accomplish what I'm trying to do would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.

    Read the article

  • SQL : where vs. on in join

    - by Erwin
    Perhaps a dumb question, but consider these 2 tables : T1 Store Year 01 2009 02 2009 03 2009 01 2010 02 2010 03 2010 T2 Store 02 Why is this INNER JOIN giving me the results I want (filtering the [year] in the ON clause) : select t1.* from t1 inner join t2 on t1.store = t2.store and t1.[year] = '2009' Store Year 02 2009 And why the LEFT OUTER JOIN include records of year 2010 ? select t1.* from t1 left outer join t2 on t1.store = t2.store and t1.year = '2009' where t2.store is null 01 2009 03 2009 01 2010 02 2010 03 2010 And I have to write the [year] filter in the 'WHERE' clause : select t1.* from t1 left outer join t2 on t1.store = t2.store where t2.store is null and t1.year = '2009' 01 2009 03 2009 Like I said, perhaps a dumb question, but it's bugging me !

    Read the article

  • SQL Server database with clustered GUID PKs - switch clustered index or switch to sequential (comb)

    - by Eyvind
    We have a database in which all the PKs are GUIDs, and most of the PKs are also the clustered index for the table. We know that this is bad (due to the random nature of GUIDs). So, it seems there are basically two options here (short of throwing out GUIDs as PKs altogether, which we cannot do (at least not at this time)). We could change the GUID generation algorithm to e.g. the one that NHibernate uses, as detailed in this post, or we could, for the tables that are under the heaviest use, change to a different clustered index, e.g. an IDENTITY column, and keep the "random" GUIDs as PKs. Is it possible to give any general recommendations in such a scenario? The application in question has 500+ tables, the largest one presently at about 1,5 million rows, a few tables around 500 000 rows, and the rest significantly lower (most of them well below 10K). Furthermore, the application is installed at several customer sites already, so we have to take any possible negative effects for existing customer into consideration. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Complex query making site extremely slow

    - by Basit
    select SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS DISTINCT media.*, username from album as album, album_permission as permission, user as user, media as media , word_tag as word_tag, tag as tag where ((media.album_id = album.album_id and album.private = 'yes' and album.album_id = permission.album_id and (permission.email = '' or permission.user_id = '') ) or (media.album_id = album.album_id and album.private = 'no' ) or media.album_id = '0' ) and media.status = '1' and media.user_id = user.user_id and word_tag.media_id = media.media_id and word_tag.tag_id = tag.tag_id and tag.name in ('justin','bieber','malfunction','katherine','heigl','wardrobe','cinetube') and media.media_type = 'video' and media.media_id not in ('YHL6a5z8MV4') group by media.media_id order by RAND() #there is limit too, by 20 rows.. i dont know where to begin explaining about this query, but please forgive me and ask me if you have any question. following is the explanation. SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS is calculating how many rows are there and will be using for pagination, so it counts total records, even tho only 20 is showing. DISTINCT will stop the repeated row to display. username is from user table. album, album_permission. its checking if album is private and if it is, then check if user has permission, by user_id. i think rest is easy to understand, but if you need to know more about it, then please ask. im really frustrated by this query and site is very slow or not opening sometimes cause of this query. please help

    Read the article

  • Linq To Sql - DataContext.SubmitChanges() problem

    - by Ahmet Altun
    I have a code like this. DBContext is Datacontext instance. try { TBLORGANISM org = new TBLORGANISM(); org.OrganismDesc = p.Subject; DBContext.TBLORGANISMs.InsertOnSubmit(org); DBContext.SubmitChanges(); } catch (Exception) { } At this point, I want to IGNORE the error and want to be skipped. Not to be retried. But when I try another insert like TBLACTION act = new TBLACTION(); act.ActionDesc = p.ActionName; DBContext.TBLACTIONs.InsertOnSubmit(act); DBContext.SubmitChanges(); SubmitChanges firstly retries previous attempt. How can I tell "skip errors, don't try again"?

    Read the article

  • SQL is this equvelent to a LEFT JoIn?

    - by Jim
    Is this equvelent to a LEFT JOIN? select distinct a.name, b.name from tableA a, (select name from tableB) as b It seems as though there is no link between the two tables. Is there an easier / more efficient way to write this?

    Read the article

  • SQL RENAME TABLE command

    - by Nano HE
    Hello. I can run RENAME TABLE student TO student_new ; The command is same and easy to follow. Is there a methods to rename a lot of tables in simple command. Assume all the tables belog to the same DB name. I don't need write a lot of code as below? RENAME TALBE pre_access TO pre_new_access; RENAME TALBE pre_activities TO pre_new_activities; RENAME TALBE pre_activityapplies TO pre_new_activityapplies; RENAME TALBE pre_adminactions TO pre_new_adminactions; RENAME TALBE pre_admincustom TO pre_new_admincustom; RENAME TALBE pre_admingroups TO pre_new_admingroups; RENAME TALBE pre_adminnotes TO pre_new_adminnotes; ... (there are still so many tables need to be renamed)

    Read the article

  • SQL Where question

    - by needshelp
    Hi all, I have a question about case statements and nulls in a where clause. I want to do the following: Declare @someVar int = null select column1 from TestTable t where t = case when @someVar is not null then @someVar else t end Here is the problem: Let's say @someVar is null. Let's also say that column1 from TestTable t has NULL column values. Then, my condition t = t in the case statement will always evaluate to false. I basically just want to be able to conditionally filter the column based on the value of @someVar if it's provided. Any help?

    Read the article

  • Data refresh and drill down problem with SSAS cube and excel services

    - by chaitanya
    I have a SSAS cube which I am using in an excel document, prepare a report which has drill-down etc and i am publishing it to a sharepoint site. It gets published alright but when I try to drill down it throws an error "Data Refresh failed" etc.The data source and the sharpoint site are on the same machine(running windows server 2008) and we have windows authentication running. From what I have been able to find on the internet there is a problem with passing the windows authentication credentials to the database etc.But I have not been able to find the exact way to sort out these problem. What is the solution for this????

    Read the article

  • SMO restore of SQL database doesn't overwrite

    - by Tom H.
    I'm trying to restore a database from a backup file using SMO. If the database does not already exist then it works fine. However, if the database already exists then I get no errors, but the database is not overwritten. The "restore" process still takes just as long, so it looks like it's working and doing a restore, but in the end the database has not changed. I'm doing this in Powershell using SMO. The code is a bit long, but I've included it below. You'll notice that I do set $restore.ReplaceDatabase = $true. Also, I use a try-catch block and report on any errors (I hope), but none are returned. Any obvious mistakes? Is it possible that I'm not reporting some error and it's being hidden from me? Thanks for any help or advice that you can give! function Invoke-SqlRestore { param( [string]$backup_file_name, [string]$server_name, [string]$database_name, [switch]$norecovery=$false ) # Get a new connection to the server [Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.Smo.Server]$server = New-SMOconnection -server_name $server_name Write-Host "Starting restore to $database_name on $server_name." Try { $backup_device = New-Object("Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.Smo.BackupDeviceItem") ($backup_file_name, "File") # Get local paths to the Database and Log file locations If ($server.Settings.DefaultFile.Length -eq 0) {$database_path = $server.Information.MasterDBPath } Else { $database_path = $server.Settings.DefaultFile} If ($server.Settings.DefaultLog.Length -eq 0 ) {$database_log_path = $server.Information.MasterDBLogPath } Else { $database_log_path = $server.Settings.DefaultLog} # Load up the Restore object settings $restore = New-Object Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.Smo.Restore $restore.Action = 'Database' $restore.Database = $database_name $restore.ReplaceDatabase = $true if ($norecovery.IsPresent) { $restore.NoRecovery = $true } Else { $restore.Norecovery = $false } $restore.Devices.Add($backup_device) # Get information from the backup file $restore_details = $restore.ReadBackupHeader($server) $data_files = $restore.ReadFileList($server) # Restore all backup files ForEach ($data_row in $data_files) { $logical_name = $data_row.LogicalName $physical_name = Get-FileName -path $data_row.PhysicalName $restore_data = New-Object("Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.Smo.RelocateFile") $restore_data.LogicalFileName = $logical_name if ($data_row.Type -eq "D") { # Restore Data file $restore_data.PhysicalFileName = $database_path + "\" + $physical_name } Else { # Restore Log file $restore_data.PhysicalFileName = $database_log_path + "\" + $physical_name } [Void]$restore.RelocateFiles.Add($restore_data) } $restore.SqlRestore($server) # If there are two files, assume the next is a Log if ($restore_details.Rows.Count -gt 1) { $restore.Action = [Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.Smo.RestoreActionType]::Log $restore.FileNumber = 2 $restore.SqlRestore($server) } } Catch { $ex = $_.Exception Write-Output $ex.message $ex = $ex.InnerException while ($ex.InnerException) { Write-Output $ex.InnerException.message $ex = $ex.InnerException } Throw $ex } Finally { $server.ConnectionContext.Disconnect() } Write-Host "Restore ended without any errors." }

    Read the article

  • Help:Graph contest problem: maybe a modified Dijkstra or another alternative algorithm

    - by newba
    Hi you all, I'm trying to do this contest exercise about graphs: XPTO is an intrepid adventurer (a little too temerarious for his own good) who boasts about exploring every corner of the universe, no matter how inhospitable. In fact, he doesn't visit the planets where people can easily live in, he prefers those where only a madman would go with a very good reason (several millions of credits for instance). His latest exploit is trying to survive in Proxima III. The problem is that Proxima III suffers from storms of highly corrosive acids that destroy everything, including spacesuits that were especially designed to withstand corrosion. Our intrepid explorer was caught in a rectangular area in the middle of one of these storms. Fortunately, he has an instrument that is capable of measuring the exact concentration of acid on each sector and how much damage it does to his spacesuit. Now, he only needs to find out if he can escape the storm. Problem The problem consists of finding an escape route that will allow XPTOto escape the noxious storm. You are given the initial energy of the spacesuit, the size of the rectangular area and the damage that the spacesuit will suffer while standing in each sector. Your task is to find the exit sector, the number of steps necessary to reach it and the amount of energy his suit will have when he leaves the rectangular area. The escape route chosen should be the safest one (i.e., the one where his spacesuit will be the least damaged). Notice that Rodericus will perish if the energy of his suit reaches zero. In case there are more than one possible solutions, choose the one that uses the least number of steps. If there are at least two sectors with the same number of steps (X1, Y1) and (X2, Y2) then choose the first if X1 < X2 or if X1 = X2 and Y1 < Y2. Constraints 0 < E = 30000 the suit's starting energy 0 = W = 500 the rectangle's width 0 = H = 500 rectangle's height 0 < X < W the starting X position 0 < Y < H the starting Y position 0 = D = 10000 the damage sustained in each sector Input The first number given is the number of test cases. Each case will consist of a line with the integers E, X and Y. The following line will have the integers W and H. The following lines will hold the matrix containing the damage D the spacesuit will suffer whilst in the corresponding sector. Notice that, as is often the case for computer geeks, (1,1) corresponds to the upper left corner. Output If there is a solution, the output will be the remaining energy, the exit sector's X and Y coordinates and the number of steps of the route that will lead Rodericus to safety. In case there is no solution, the phrase Goodbye cruel world! will be written. Sample Input 3 40 3 3 7 8 12 11 12 11 3 12 12 12 11 11 12 2 1 13 11 11 12 2 13 2 14 10 11 13 3 2 1 12 10 11 13 13 11 12 13 12 12 11 13 11 13 12 13 12 12 11 11 11 11 13 13 10 10 13 11 12 8 3 4 7 6 4 3 3 2 2 3 2 2 5 2 2 2 3 3 2 1 2 2 3 2 2 4 3 3 2 2 4 1 3 1 4 3 2 3 1 2 2 3 3 0 3 4 10 3 4 7 6 3 3 1 2 2 1 0 2 2 2 4 2 2 5 2 2 1 3 0 2 2 2 2 1 3 3 4 2 3 4 4 3 1 1 3 1 2 2 4 2 2 1 Sample Output 12 5 1 8 Goodbye cruel world! 5 1 4 2 Basically, I think we have to do a modified Dijkstra, in which the distance between nodes is the suit's energy (and we have to subtract it instead of suming up like is normal with distances) and the steps are the ....steps made along the path. The pos with the bester binomial (Energy,num_Steps) is our "way out". Important : XPTO obviously can't move in diagonals, so we have to cut out this cases. I have many ideas, but I have such a problem implementing them... Could someone please help me thinking about this with some code or, at least, ideas? Am I totally wrong?

    Read the article

  • SQL Server 2008 ContainsTable, CTE, and Paging

    - by David Murdoch
    I'd like to perform efficient paging using containstable. The following query selects the top 10 ranked results from my database using containstable when searching for a name (first or last) that begins with "Joh". DECLARE @Limit int; SET @Limit = 10; SELECT TOP @Limit c.ChildID, c.PersonID, c.DOB, c.Gender FROM [Person].[vFullName] AS v INNER JOIN CONTAINSTABLE( [Person].[vFullName], (FullName), IS ABOUT ( "Joh*" WEIGHT (.4), "Joh" WEIGHT (.6)) ) AS k3 ON v.PersonID = k3.[KEY] JOIN [Child].[Details] c ON c.PersonID = v.PersonID JOIN [Person].[Details] p ON p.PersonID = c.PersonID ORDER BY k3.RANK DESC, FullName ASC, p.Active DESC, c.ChildID ASC I'd like to combine it with the following CTE which returns the 10th-20th results ordered by ChildID (the primary key): DECLARE @Start int; DECLARE @Limit int; SET @Start = 10; SET @Limit = 10; WITH ChildEntities AS ( SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY ChildID) AS Row, ChildID FROM Child.Details ) SELECT c.ChildID, c.PersonID, c.DOB, c.Gender FROM ChildEntities cte INNER JOIN Child.Details c ON cte.ChildID = c.ChildID WHERE cte.Row BETWEEN @Start+1 AND @Start+@Limit ORDER BY cte.Row ASC

    Read the article

  • Linq-to-SQL Grouping not ordering correctly

    - by Grant
    Hi can someone help me convert this tsql statement into c# linq2sql? select [series] from table group by [series] order by max([date]) desc This is what i have so far - the list is not in correct order.. var x = from c in db.Table orderby c.Date descending group c by c.Series into d select d.Key;

    Read the article

  • SQL Server: Difference between PARTITION BY and GROUP BY

    - by Mike Mooney
    I've been using GROUP BY for all types of aggregate queries over the years. Recently, I've been reverse-engineering some code that uses PARTITION BY to perform aggregations. In reading through all the documentation I can find about PARTITION BY, it sounds a lot like GROUP BY, maybe with a little extra functionality added in? Are they two versions of the same general functionality, or are they something different entirely?

    Read the article

  • Sql Query - Selecting rows where user can be both friend and user

    - by Gublooo
    Hey Sorry the title is not very clear. This is a follow up to my earlier question where one of the members helped me with a query. I have a following friends Table Friend friend_id - primary key user_id user_id_friend status The way the table is populated is - when I send a friend request to John - my userID appears in user_id and Johns userID appears in user_id_friend. Now another scenario is say Mike sends me a friend request - in this case mike's userID will appear in user_id and my userID will appear in user_id_friend So to find all my friends - I need to run a query to find where my userID appears in both user_id column as well as user_id_friend column What I am trying to do now is - when I search for user say John - I want all users Johns listed on my site to show up along with the status of whether they are my friend or not and if they are not - then show a "Add Friend" button. Based on the previous post - I got this query which does part of the job - My example user_id is 1: SELECT u.user_id, f.status FROM user u LEFT OUTER JOIN friend f ON f.user_id = u.user_id and f.user_id_friend = 1 where u.name like '%' So this only shows users with whom I am friends where they have sent me request ie my userID appears in user_id_friend. Although I am friends with others (where my userID appears in user_id column) - this query will return that as null To get those I need another query like this SELECT u.user_id, f.status FROM user u LEFT OUTER JOIN friend f ON f.user_id_friend = u.user_id and f.user_id = 1 where u.name like '%' So how do I combine these queries to return 1 set of users and what my friendship status with them is. I hope my question is clear Thanks

    Read the article

  • custom listview adapter getView method being called multiple times, and in no coherent order

    - by edzillion
    I have a custom list adapter: class ResultsListAdapter extends ArrayAdapter<RecordItem> { in the overridden 'getView' method I do a print to check what position is and whether it is a convertView or not: @Override public View getView(int position, View convertView, ViewGroup parent) { System.out.println("getView " + position + " " + convertView); The output of this (when the list is first displayed, no user input as yet) 04-11 16:24:05.860: INFO/System.out(681): getView 0 null 04-11 16:24:29.020: INFO/System.out(681): getView 1 android.widget.RelativeLayout@43d415d8 04-11 16:25:48.070: INFO/System.out(681): getView 2 android.widget.RelativeLayout@43d415d8 04-11 16:25:49.110: INFO/System.out(681): getView 3 android.widget.RelativeLayout@43d415d8 04-11 16:25:49.710: INFO/System.out(681): getView 0 android.widget.RelativeLayout@43d415d8 04-11 16:25:50.251: INFO/System.out(681): getView 1 null 04-11 16:26:01.300: INFO/System.out(681): getView 2 null 04-11 16:26:02.020: INFO/System.out(681): getView 3 null 04-11 16:28:28.091: INFO/System.out(681): getView 0 null 04-11 16:37:46.180: INFO/System.out(681): getView 1 android.widget.RelativeLayout@43cff8f0 04-11 16:37:47.091: INFO/System.out(681): getView 2 android.widget.RelativeLayout@43cff8f0 04-11 16:37:47.730: INFO/System.out(681): getView 3 android.widget.RelativeLayout@43cff8f0 AFAIK, though I couldn't find it stated explicitly, getView() is only called for visible rows. Since my app starts with four visible rows at least the position numbers cycling from 0-3 makes sense. But the rest is a mess: Why is getview called for each row four times? Where are these convertViews coming from when I haven't scrolled yet? I did a bit of reseach, and without getting a good answer, I did notice that people were associating this issue with layout issues. So in case, here's the layout that contains the list: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <LinearLayout xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android" android:layout_height="fill_parent" android:layout_width="fill_parent" android:orientation="vertical" > <TextView android:id="@+id/pageDetails" android:layout_width="fill_parent" android:layout_height="wrap_content" /> <ListView android:id="@+id/list" android:layout_width="fill_parent" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:drawSelectorOnTop="false" /> </LinearLayout> and the layout of each individual row: <RelativeLayout xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android" android:layout_width="fill_parent" android:layout_height="108dp" android:padding="4dp"> <ImageView android:id="@+id/thumb" android:layout_width="120dp" android:layout_height="fill_parent" android:layout_alignParentTop="true" android:layout_alignParentBottom="true" android:layout_alignParentLeft="true" android:layout_marginRight="8dp" android:src="@drawable/loading" /> <TextView android:id="@+id/price" android:layout_width="wrap_content" android:layout_height="18dp" android:layout_toRightOf="@id/thumb" android:layout_alignParentBottom="true" android:singleLine="true" /> <TextView android:id="@+id/date" android:layout_width="wrap_content" android:layout_height="18dp" android:layout_alignParentBottom="true" android:layout_alignParentRight="true" android:paddingRight="4dp" android:singleLine="true" /> <TextView android:id="@+id/title" android:layout_width="fill_parent" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:textSize="17dp" android:layout_toRightOf="@id/thumb" android:layout_alignParentRight="true" android:layout_alignParentTop="true" android:paddingRight="4dp" android:layout_alignWithParentIfMissing="true" android:gravity="center" /> Thank you for your time

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355  | Next Page >