Search Results

Search found 7617 results on 305 pages for 'fields'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 35/305 | < Previous Page | 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42  | Next Page >

  • IntegrityError with Booleand Fields and Postgresql

    - by xRobot
    I have this simple Blog model: class Blog(models.Model): title = models.CharField(_('title'), max_length=60, blank=True, null=True) body = models.TextField(_('body')) user = models.ForeignKey(User) is_public = models.BooleanField(_('is public'), default = True) When I insert a blog in admin interface, I get this error: IntegrityError at /admin/blogs/blog/add/ null value in column "is_public" violates not-null constraint Why ???

    Read the article

  • extracting multiple fields from a text file using php

    - by Dave
    Hi, what is the best way of extracting multiple (~40 values) from a text file using php? the data is more or less like: NAMEA valuea NAMEB valueb I'm looking for a proper* approach to extracting this data into a data-structure, because i will need to specify regexs for all of them (all 40). did i make myself clear? *meaning, the default/painful method would be for me to do: $namea = extractfunction("regexa", $textfilevalue); $nameb = extractfunction("regeb", $textfilevalue); ... 40 times!

    Read the article

  • php HTTP_REFERER header, how to turn off or leave blank

    - by eco_bach
    Hi I'm using the following simple PHP proxy script but am getting a sporadic message at the destination site. I'm thinking that perhaps it may have something to do with the HTTP_REFERER header, although I'm not explicitly defining it. Can anyone tell me how to explicitly turn off or leave the HTTP_REFERER header blank? Thanks in advance! $url = $_GET['path']; readfile($path);

    Read the article

  • Rails - Searching multiple textboxes and fields

    - by ChrisWesAllen
    I have a model of events that has various information such as date, location, and description of whats going on. I would like for my users to be able to search through the events list through a set of different textboxes but I having a hard time getting the syntax just right in my view I have... <% form_tag users_path, :method => 'get' do %> (<%= text_field_tag :search_keyword, params[:search_keyword] %>) + (<%= text_field_tag :search_zip, params[:search_zip] %>) <%= submit_tag "Find Events!", :name => nil %> <% end %> and in the controller I'm trying to query through the results.... if params[:search_keyword] @events = Event.find(:all, :conditions => [' name LIKE ? ', "%#{params[:search_keyword]}%"]) elsif params[:search_zip] @events = Event.find(:all, :origin=> params[:search_zip], :within=>50 ) else @events = Event.find(:all) end How do I code it so that it will perform the search only if the textbox isnt empty? also if both textboxes are filled then @events should be the product of BOTH queries? if have no idea if this would work =(???@event = @event+ event.find.....???

    Read the article

  • How to get correct children ids using fields_for "parents[]", parent do |f| using f.fields_for :children, child ?

    - by Anatortoise House
    I'm editing multiple instances of a parent model in an index view in one form, as in Railscasts #198. Each parent has_many :children and accepts_nested_attributes_for :children, as in Railscasts #196 and #197 <%= form_tag %> <% for parent in @parents %> <%= fields_for "parents[]", parent do |f| <%= f.text_field :job %> <%= f.fields_for :children do |cf| %> <% cf.text_field :chore %> <% end %> <% end %> <% end %> <% end %> Given parent.id==1 f.text_field :job correctly generates <input id="parents_1_job" type="text" value="coding" size="30" name="parents[1][job]"> But cf.text_field :chore generates ids and names that don't have the parent index. id="parents_children_attributes_0_chore" name="parents[children_attributes][0][chore]" If I try passing the specific child object to f.fields_for like this: <% for child in parent.children %> <%= f.fields_for :children, child do |cf| %> <%= cf.text_field :chore %> <% end %> <% end %> I get the same. If I change the method from :children to "[]children" I get id="parents_1___children_chore" which gets the right parent_index but doesn't provide an array slot for the child index. "[]children[]" isn't right either: id="parents_1__children_3_chore" as I was expecting attributes_0_chore instead of 3_chore. Do I need to directly modify an attribute of the FormBuilder object, or subclass FormBuilder to make this work, or is there a syntax that fits this situation? Thanks for any thoughts.

    Read the article

  • C# equivalent of typeof for fields

    - by rwallace
    With reflection, you can look up a class from a string at run time, but you can also say typeof(Foo) and get compile time type checking, auto completion etc. If what you want is a field not a class, you can look it up from a string at runtime, but if you want compile time type checking etc., is there anyway to say something like fieldof(Foo.Bar)? I know the name of both the class and the field in advance, and I want to be able to refer to the field at compile time rather than with a run-time string lookup.

    Read the article

  • wordpress query custom fields and category

    - by InnateDev
    I have a query that creates a table view and then another that queries the view. The results are extremely slow. Here is the code: create or replace view $view_table_name as select * from wp_2_postmeta where post_id IN ( select ID FROM wp_2_posts wposts LEFT JOIN wp_2_term_relationships ON (wposts.ID = wp_2_term_relationships.object_id) LEFT JOIN wp_2_term_taxonomy ON (wp_2_term_relationships.term_taxonomy_id = wp_2_term_taxonomy.term_taxonomy_id) WHERE wp_2_term_taxonomy.taxonomy = 'category' AND wp_2_term_taxonomy.parent = $cat || wp_2_term_taxonomy.term_id = $cat AND wposts.post_status = 'publish' AND wposts.post_type = 'post') The $values have been put it in for this example that queries the view table for the results. select distinct(ID) from $view_table_name wposts LEFT JOIN wp_2_postmeta wpostmeta ON wposts.ID = wpostmeta.post_id WHERE post_status = 'publish' AND ID NOT IN (SELECT post_id FROM wp_2_postmeta WHERE meta_key = '$var' && meta_value = '$value1') AND ID NOT IN (SELECT post_id FROM wp_2_postmeta WHERE meta_key = '$var' && meta_value = '$value2') AND ID NOT IN (SELECT post_id FROM wp_2_postmeta WHERE meta_key = '$var' && meta_value = '$value3') AND postmeta.meta_key = 'pd_form' ORDER BY CASE wpostmeta.meta_value WHEN '$value5' THEN 1 WHEN '$value6' THEN 2 WHEN '$value7' THEN 3 WHEN '$value8' THEN 4 WHEN '$value9' THEN 5 THEN '$value10' THEN 6 WHEN '$value11' THEN 7 WHEN '$value11' THEN 8 END

    Read the article

  • Fields in CakePHP could not be referred by JQuery

    - by kwokwai
    Hi all, I have got a simple HTMl form with one field as follows: <input type="text" name="data['User']['user_id']" id="data['User']['user_id']" value="1"> $(document).ready(function(){ $("#data['User']['user_id']").mouseover(function(){ alert("hello"); }); }); The code couldn't work, I think it may be the name of the Input text field that caused the problem, but I don't know how to alter it because this is the naming convention in CakePHP.

    Read the article

  • Disable form submission via Enter key on only _some fields

    - by justSteve
    I want to retain the conventional 'form submits when i press Enter' behavior because users are familiar with. But by reflex, they often hit enter when they finish with a text input box - but before they are actually done with the complete form. I'd like to hijack the Enter key only when then focus is on a certain class of input. Looking Related Questions this looks like what I'm looking for: if (document.addEventListener) { document.getElementById('strip').addEventListener('keypress',HandleKeyPress,false); } else { document.getElementById('strip').onkeypress = HandleKeyPress; } but the if (document.addEventListener) { is unfamiliar.

    Read the article

  • How to type in two text fields simulatenously (jQuery)

    - by tester
    I was unsuccessful in finding a jQuery plugin that allowed me to write in two inputs simultaneously. I'm trying to write a normal title in one field, and at the same time type in another input write the same text without special characters or spaces. e.g. Input 1: This is my Title! Input 2: ThisIsMyTitle

    Read the article

  • passing array fields to jquery ajax

    - by Rob Brandt
    I have a form I am submitting via jquery ajax. Early in the form, I have this field: <select name="inquirymodule[]" id="inquirymodule"> The user can add as many as they like, and all the selects go into the inquirymodule[] array. The jQuery looks like this: jQuery.ajax({ type: 'POST', url: 'ajax.php', dataType: 'json', data: { inquirymodule: jQuery("select[name='inquirymodule[]']").serialize(), }, error: function(XMLHttpRequest, textStatus, errorThrown) { alert('error'); } }); That works fine. Trying to do the same thing with a date, like this: <input class="formInput" type="text" id="startBreak0" name='startbreak[]' /> adding startbreak: jQuery("select[name='startbreak[]']").serialize() to the ajax call. It doesn't work, I cannot see why. Suggestions?

    Read the article

  • LINQ to SQL selecting fields

    - by user3686904
    I am trying to populate more columns in the query below, could someone assist me? QUERY: var query = from r in SQLresults.AsEnumerable() group r by r.Field<string>("COLUMN_ONE") into groupedTable select new { c1 = groupedTable.Key, c2 = groupedTable.Sum(s => s.Field<decimal>("COLUMN_TWO")), }; How could I get a column named COLUMN_THREE in this query ? Thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • Filtering across two ManyToMany fields

    - by KVISH
    I have a User model and an Event model. I have the following for both: class Event(models.Model): ... timestamp = models.DateTimeField() organization_map = models.ManyToManyField(Organization) class User(AuthUser): ... subscribed_orgs = models.ManyToManyField('Organization') I want to find all events that were created in a certain timeframe and find the users who are subscribed to those organizations. I know how to write SQL for this (it's very easy), but whats the pythonic way of doing this using Django ORM? I'm trying as per below: orgs = Organization.objects.all() events = Event.objects.filter(timestamp__gt=min_time) # Min time is the time I want to start from events = events.filter(organization_map__in=orgs) But from there, how do I map to users who have that organization as a subscription? I'm trying to map it like so: users = User.objects.filter(subscribed_orgs__in=...

    Read the article

  • How remove node ID [nid:n] in NodeReference fields

    - by Snazzy
    Hi. This is the same question of this link: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1515722/removing-nidn-in-nodereference-autocomplete According with the first answer (Grayside) I've created my own module and activated. Then I create a new content, I look sth up in the nodereference field and finally select it - it works (Doesn't appear the [nid:n]). But, when I view/preview or save or edit the content, the [nid:n] appears again. Anybody can help me?

    Read the article

  • MySQL: Return grouped fields where the group is not empty, efficiently

    - by Ryan Badour
    In one statement I'm trying to group rows of one table by joining to another table. I want to only get grouped rows where their grouped result is not empty. Ex. Items and Categories SELECT Category.id FROM Item, Category WHERE Category.id = Item.categoryId GROUP BY Category.id HAVING COUNT(Item.id) > 0 The above query gives me the results that I want but this is slow, since it has to count all the rows grouped by Category.id. What's a more effecient way? I was trying to do a Group By LIMIT to only retrieve one row per group. But my attempts failed horribly. Any idea how I can do this? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Putting cursor into dynamically added input fields with jQuery

    - by Sandoichi
    I wrote a script that allows users to click onto a table cell and edit the value with jQuery. Basically, when they click the cell, the HTML in the cell gets replaced with an input box and any text that was previously in the cell gets added to the input. My issue is that whenever they click on the cell, the input doesn't get focused and they have to click a second time to put the cursor in. I have tried a bunch of selectors with .focus() to try and put the cursor in but I'm not having any luck. Here is the function that gets called when the user clicks on a cell: function edit_cell() { if($(this).hasClass('edit_box')) if(!$(this).hasClass('editable')){ $(this).addClass('editable'); string = $(this).text(); $(this).html("<input type='text' value='" + string + "'/>"); } } Also, is there a way to make the size of the input box relative to the width of the cell it gets added too? I don't know how to relate the size attribute to the width for the cell...and it is driving me crazy!

    Read the article

  • Is it better to specialize in a single field I like, or expand into other fields to broaden my horizons?

    - by Oak
    This is a dilemma about which I have been thinking for quite a while. I'm a graduate student and my topics of interest are programming language design, code analysis, compilation, etc. So far, this field has been very interesting and rewarding for me, so I was thinking about finding a job in that field and continuing to specialize in it. I feel like it's a relatively solid field which won't "get out of style" anytime soon. I've always thought that in such complex fields it's better to be a real expert than just another guy who superficially understand what the experts are talking about. On the other hand, I feel that by specializing this way I really limit my future option. I have always been a strong believer in multidisciplinary approaches to problems. Maybe I should go search for a general programming job in which I could gain experience in other fields, as well as occasionally apply my favorite field for solving problems. Specializing in only one or two fields can prevent me from thinking outside the box and cause stagnation. I would really like to hear more opinions about this choice. The truth is I'm already leaning towards one of the choices, so basic psychology says nothing will change my mind, but I would still love to hear some feedback.

    Read the article

  • Should I add parameters to instance methods that use those instance fields as parameters?

    - by john smith optional
    I have an instance method that uses instance fields in its work. I can leave the method without that parameters as they're available to me, or I can add them to the parameter list, thus making my method more "generic" and not reliable on the class. On the other hand, additional parameters will be in parameters list. Which approach is preferable and why? Edit: at the moment I don't know if my method will be public or private. Edit2: clarification: both method and fields are instance level.

    Read the article

  • Is programming too easy if compared to other fields?

    - by Shashank jain
    I have been programming since some years and I won't say its a piece of cake but in this field, you know how to do things. You can always google up resources, tutorials. There are tons of already written code to help you with - frameworks, libraries but if you compare it to other innovation fields like "Electronics". Its not too easy to get started with, the community might not be too large on the internet, getting the things right plus lets not forget there is nothing to tell you where the error might be. I have wanted many times but not be able to get into, like, building some kind of robot because I don't know how to start. So my question is that, does programming tends to be easy compared rest of the fields or is it just my intrest that makes it easy?

    Read the article

  • Make methods that do not depend on instance fields, static?

    - by m3th0dman
    Recently I started programming in Groovy for a integration testing framework, for a Java project. I use Intellij IDEA with Groovy plug-in and I am surprised to see as a warning for all the methods that are non-static and do not depend on any instance fields. In Java, however, this is not an issue (at least from IDE's point of view). Should all methods that do not depend onto any instance fields be transformed into static functions? If true, is this specific to Groovy or it is available for OOP in general? And why?

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42  | Next Page >