Search Results

Search found 17770 results on 711 pages for 'inside the concurrent collections'.

Page 35/711 | < Previous Page | 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42  | Next Page >

  • List method creation

    - by Jonathan D
    I'm creating a list of my defined objects like so List<clock> cclocks = new List<clocks>(); for each object in the list i'm calling a method moveTime, like so foreach(clock c in cclocks) { c.moveTime(); } is the a way i can write some cleaver thing so i can call cclocks.moveTime(); it would then go though the list doing that method I guess I want to create a collection method? I'm guessing there must be some thing I can do I just don't know what. thanks for your help

    Read the article

  • ResultSet and aggregation

    - by kachanov
    Ok, I admit my situation is special There is a data system that supports SQL-92 and JDBC interface However the SQL requets are pretty expensive, and in my application I need to retreive the same data multiple times and aggregate it ("group by") on different fields to show different dimensions of the same data. For example on one screen I have three tables that show the same set or records but aggregated by City (1st grid), by Population (2nd grid), by number of babies (3rd grid) This amounts to 3 SQL queries (which is very slow), UNLESS anyone of you can suggest any idea any library from apache commons or from google code, so that I can select all records into ResultSet and get 3 arrays of data group by different fields from this single ResultSet. Am I'm missing some obvious and unexpected solution to this problem?

    Read the article

  • custom collection in property grid

    - by guyl
    Hi guys. I'm using this article as a reference to use custom collection in propertygrid: LINK When I open the collectioneditor and remove all items then I press OK, I get an exception if null. How can i solve that ? I am using: public T this[int index] { get { if (List.Count == 0) { return default(T); } else { return (T)this.List[index]; } } } as a getter for an item, of course if I have no object how can i restart the whole collection ? this is the whole code /// <summary> /// A generic folder settings collection to use in a property grid. /// </summary> /// <typeparam name="T">can be import or export folder settings.</typeparam> [Serializable] [TypeConverter(typeof(FolderSettingsCollectionConverter)), Editor(typeof(FolderSettingsCollectionEditor), typeof(UITypeEditor))] public class FolderSettingsCollection_New<T> : CollectionBase, ICustomTypeDescriptor { private bool m_bRestrictNumberOfItems; private int m_bNumberOfItems; private Dictionary<string, int> m_UID2Idx = new Dictionary<string, int>(); private T[] arrTmp; /// <summary> /// C'tor, can determine the number of objects to hold. /// </summary> /// <param name="bRestrictNumberOfItems">restrict the number of folders to hold.</param> /// <param name="iNumberOfItems">The number of folders to hold.</param> public FolderSettingsCollection_New(bool bRestrictNumberOfItems = false , int iNumberOfItems = 1) { m_bRestrictNumberOfItems = bRestrictNumberOfItems; m_bNumberOfItems = iNumberOfItems; } /// <summary> /// Add folder to collection. /// </summary> /// <param name="t">Folder to add.</param> public void Add(T t) { if (m_bRestrictNumberOfItems) { if (this.List.Count >= m_bNumberOfItems) { return; } } int index = this.List.Add(t); if (t is WriteDataFolderSettings || t is ReadDataFolderSettings) { FolderSettingsBase tmp = t as FolderSettingsBase; m_UID2Idx.Add(tmp.UID, index); } } /// <summary> /// Remove folder to collection. /// </summary> /// <param name="t">Folder to remove.</param> public void Remove(T t) { this.List.Remove(t); if (t is WriteDataFolderSettings || t is ReadDataFolderSettings) { FolderSettingsBase tmp = t as FolderSettingsBase; m_UID2Idx.Remove(tmp.UID); } } /// <summary> /// Gets ot sets a folder. /// </summary> /// <param name="index">The index of the folder in the collection.</param> /// <returns>A folder object.</returns> public T this[int index] { get { //if (List.Count == 0) //{ // return default(T); //} //else //{ return (T)this.List[index]; //} } } /// <summary> /// Gets or sets a folder. /// </summary> /// <param name="sUID">The UID of the folder.</param> /// <returns>A folder object.</returns> public T this[string sUID] { get { if (this.Count == 0 || !m_UID2Idx.ContainsKey(sUID)) { return default(T); } else { return (T)this.List[m_UID2Idx[sUID]]; } } } /// <summary> /// /// </summary> /// <param name="sUID"></param> /// <returns></returns> public bool ContainsItemByUID(string sUID) { return m_UID2Idx.ContainsKey(sUID); } /// <summary> /// /// </summary> /// <returns></returns> public String GetClassName() { return TypeDescriptor.GetClassName(this, true); } /// <summary> /// /// </summary> /// <returns></returns> public AttributeCollection GetAttributes() { return TypeDescriptor.GetAttributes(this, true); } /// <summary> /// /// </summary> /// <returns></returns> public String GetComponentName() { return TypeDescriptor.GetComponentName(this, true); } /// <summary> /// /// </summary> /// <returns></returns> public TypeConverter GetConverter() { return TypeDescriptor.GetConverter(this, true); } /// <summary> /// /// </summary> /// <returns></returns> public EventDescriptor GetDefaultEvent() { return TypeDescriptor.GetDefaultEvent(this, true); } /// <summary> /// /// </summary> /// <returns></returns> public PropertyDescriptor GetDefaultProperty() { return TypeDescriptor.GetDefaultProperty(this, true); } /// <summary> /// /// </summary> /// <param name="editorBaseType"></param> /// <returns></returns> public object GetEditor(Type editorBaseType) { return TypeDescriptor.GetEditor(this, editorBaseType, true); } /// <summary> /// /// </summary> /// <param name="attributes"></param> /// <returns></returns> public EventDescriptorCollection GetEvents(Attribute[] attributes) { return TypeDescriptor.GetEvents(this, attributes, true); } /// <summary> /// /// </summary> /// <returns></returns> public EventDescriptorCollection GetEvents() { return TypeDescriptor.GetEvents(this, true); } /// <summary> /// /// </summary> /// <param name="pd"></param> /// <returns></returns> public object GetPropertyOwner(PropertyDescriptor pd) { return this; } /// <summary> /// /// </summary> /// <param name="attributes"></param> /// <returns></returns> public PropertyDescriptorCollection GetProperties(Attribute[] attributes) { return GetProperties(); } /// <summary> /// Called to get the properties of this type. /// </summary> /// <returns></returns> public PropertyDescriptorCollection GetProperties() { // Create a collection object to hold property descriptors PropertyDescriptorCollection pds = new PropertyDescriptorCollection(null); // Iterate the list of employees for (int i = 0; i < this.List.Count; i++) { // Create a property descriptor for the employee item and add to the property descriptor collection CollectionPropertyDescriptor_New<T> pd = new CollectionPropertyDescriptor_New<T>(this, i); pds.Add(pd); } // return the property descriptor collection return pds; } public T[] ToArray() { if (arrTmp == null) { arrTmp = new T[List.Count]; for (int i = 0; i < List.Count; i++) { arrTmp[i] = (T)List[i]; } } return arrTmp; } } /// <summary> /// Enable to display data about a collection in a property grid. /// </summary> /// <typeparam name="T">Folder object.</typeparam> public class CollectionPropertyDescriptor_New<T> : PropertyDescriptor { private FolderSettingsCollection_New<T> collection = null; private int index = -1; /// <summary> /// /// </summary> /// <param name="coll"></param> /// <param name="idx"></param> public CollectionPropertyDescriptor_New(FolderSettingsCollection_New<T> coll, int idx) : base("#" + idx.ToString(), null) { this.collection = coll; this.index = idx; } /// <summary> /// /// </summary> public override AttributeCollection Attributes { get { return new AttributeCollection(null); } } /// <summary> /// /// </summary> /// <param name="component"></param> /// <returns></returns> public override bool CanResetValue(object component) { return true; } /// <summary> /// /// </summary> public override Type ComponentType { get { return this.collection.GetType(); } } /// <summary> /// /// </summary> public override string DisplayName { get { if (this.collection[index] != null) { return this.collection[index].ToString(); } else { return null; } } } public override string Description { get { return ""; } } /// <summary> /// /// </summary> /// <param name="component"></param> /// <returns></returns> public override object GetValue(object component) { if (this.collection[index] != null) { return this.collection[index]; } else { return null; } } /// <summary> /// /// </summary> public override bool IsReadOnly { get { return false; } } public override string Name { get { return "#" + index.ToString(); } } /// <summary> /// /// </summary> public override Type PropertyType { get { return this.collection[index].GetType(); } } public override void ResetValue(object component) { } /// <summary> /// /// </summary> /// <param name="component"></param> /// <returns></returns> public override bool ShouldSerializeValue(object component) { return true; } /// <summary> /// /// </summary> /// <param name="component"></param> /// <param name="value"></param> public override void SetValue(object component, object value) { // this.collection[index] = value; } }

    Read the article

  • Having Issue with Bounded Wildcards in Generic

    - by Sanjiv
    I am new to Java Generics, and I'm currently experimenting with Generic Coding....final goal is to convert old Non-Generic legacy code to generic one... I have defined two Classes with IS-A i.e. one is sub-class of other. public class Parent { private String name; public Parent(String name) { super(); this.name = name; } } public class Child extends Parent{ private String address; public Child(String name, String address) { super(name); this.address = address; } } Now, I am trying to create a list with bounded Wildcard. and getting Compiler Error. List<? extends Parent> myList = new ArrayList<Child>(); myList.add(new Parent("name")); // compiler-error myList.add(new Child("name", "address")); // compiler-error myList.add(new Child("name", "address")); // compiler-error Bit confused. please help me on whats wrong with this ?

    Read the article

  • VB.NET - Find a Substring in an ArrayList, StringCollection or List(Of String)

    - by CJM
    I've got some code that creates a list of AD groups that the user is a member of, with the intention of saying 'if user is a member of GroupX then allow admin access, if not allow basic access'. I was using a StringCollection to store this list of Groups, and intended to use the Contains method to test for membership of my admin group, but the problem is that this method only compares the full string - but my AD groups values are formatted as cn=GroupX, etc.... I want to be easily able to determine if a particular substring (i.e. 'GroupX') appears in the list of groups. I could always iterate through the groups check each for a substring representing my AD group name, but I'm more interested in finding out if there is a 'better' way. Clearly there are a number of repositories for the list of Groups, and it appears that Generics (List(Of String)) are more commonly preferred (which I may well implement anyway) but there is no in-built means of checking for a substring using this method either. Any suggestions? Or should I just iterated through the list of groups?

    Read the article

  • When to use LinkedList<> over ArrayList<>?

    - by sdellysse
    I've always been one to simply use List<String> names = new ArrayList<String>(); I use the interface as the type name for portability, so that when I ask questions such as these I can rework my code. When should LinkedList should be used over ArrayList and vice-versa?

    Read the article

  • Re-ordering collection C#

    - by Adam
    Hi - I have a problem which I cant seem to find answer to through searches (either that or I am searching for the completely wrong thing!). I have a list of items called "Top 10" in a sortedlist item that is populated from my DB (SortedList where int is position and string is item). I want to be able to move items up & down the list order at the click of a button and then save the new order back to the DB. I am OK with the DB part it is just the re-ordering I am really struggling with - is a sortedlist the correct collection for this? Many thanks for any advice offered.

    Read the article

  • How can I reduce the number of loops in this VIEW in Rails when using :collection?

    - by Angela
    I am using the :collection to go through all the Contacts that are part of a given Campaign. But within that Campaign I check for three different Models (each with their own partial). Feels like I am going through the list of Contacts 3x. How can I make this alot leaner? <h2>These are past due:</h2> <% @campaigns.each do |campaign| %> <h3>Campaign: <%= link_to campaign.name, campaign %></h3> <strong>Emails in this Campaign:</strong> <% for email in campaign.emails %> <h4><%= link_to email.title, email %> <%= email.days %> days</h4> <% @contacts= campaign.contacts.find(:all, :order => "date_entered ASC" )%> <!--contacts collection--> <!-- render the information for each contact --> <%= render :partial => "contact_email", :collection => @contacts, :locals => {:email => email} %> <% end %> Calls in this Campaign: <% for call in campaign.calls %> <h4><%= link_to call.title, call %> <%= call.days %> days</h4> <% @contacts= campaign.contacts.find(:all, :order => "date_entered ASC" )%> <!--contacts collection--> <!-- render the information for each contact --> <%= render :partial => "contact_call", :collection => @contacts, :locals => {:call => call} %> <% end %> Letters in this Campaign: <% for letter in campaign.letters %> <h4><%= link_to letter.title, letter %> <%= letter.days %> days</h4> <% @contacts= campaign.contacts.find(:all, :order => "date_entered ASC" )%> <!--contacts collection--> <!-- render the information for each contact --> <%= render :partial => "contact_letter", :collection => @contacts, :locals => {:letter => letter} %> <% end %> <% end %>

    Read the article

  • Choosing design method for ladder-like word game.

    - by owca
    I'm trying to build a simple application, with the finished program looking like this : I will also have to implement two different GUI layouts for this. Now I'm trying to figure out the best method to perform this task. My professor told me to introduce Element class with 4 states : - empty - invisible (used in GridLayout) - first letter - other letter I've thought about following solutions (by List I mean any sort of Collection) : 1. Element is a single letter, and each line is Element[]. Game class will be array of arrays Element[]. I guess that's the dumbest way, and the validation might be troublesome. 2. Like previously but Line is a List of Element. Game is an array of Lines. 3. Like previously but Game is a List of Lines. Which one should I choose ? Or maybe do you have better ideas ? What collection would be best if to use one ?

    Read the article

  • Self-updating collection concurrency issues

    - by DEHAAS
    I am trying to build a self-updating collection. Each item in the collection has a position (x,y). When the position is changed, an event is fired, and the collection will relocate the item. Internally the collection is using a “jagged dictionary”. The outer dictionary uses the x-coordinate a key, while the nested dictionary uses the y-coordinate a key. The nested dictionary then has a list of items as value. The collection also maintains a dictionary to store the items position as stored in the nested dictionaries – item to stored location lookup. I am having some trouble making the collection thread safe, which I really need. Source code for the collection: public class PositionCollection<TItem, TCoordinate> : ICollection<TItem> where TItem : IPositionable<TCoordinate> where TCoordinate : struct, IConvertible { private readonly object itemsLock = new object(); private readonly Dictionary<TCoordinate, Dictionary<TCoordinate, List<TItem>>> items; private readonly Dictionary<TItem, Vector<TCoordinate>> storedPositionLookup; public PositionCollection() { this.items = new Dictionary<TCoordinate, Dictionary<TCoordinate, List<TItem>>>(); this.storedPositionLookup = new Dictionary<TItem, Vector<TCoordinate>>(); } public void Add(TItem item) { if (item.Position == null) { throw new ArgumentException("Item must have a valid position."); } lock (this.itemsLock) { if (!this.items.ContainsKey(item.Position.X)) { this.items.Add(item.Position.X, new Dictionary<TCoordinate, List<TItem>>()); } Dictionary<TCoordinate, List<TItem>> xRow = this.items[item.Position.X]; if (!xRow.ContainsKey(item.Position.Y)) { xRow.Add(item.Position.Y, new List<TItem>()); } xRow[item.Position.Y].Add(item); if (this.storedPositionLookup.ContainsKey(item)) { this.storedPositionLookup[item] = new Vector<TCoordinate>(item.Position); } else { this.storedPositionLookup.Add(item, new Vector<TCoordinate>(item.Position)); // Store a copy of the original position } item.Position.PropertyChanged += (object sender, PropertyChangedEventArgs eventArgs) => this.UpdatePosition(item, eventArgs.PropertyName); } } private void UpdatePosition(TItem item, string propertyName) { lock (this.itemsLock) { Vector<TCoordinate> storedPosition = this.storedPositionLookup[item]; this.RemoveAt(storedPosition, item); this.storedPositionLookup.Remove(item); } } } I have written a simple unit test to check for concurrency issues: [TestMethod] public void TestThreadedPositionChange() { PositionCollection<Crate, int> collection = new PositionCollection<Crate, int>(); Crate crate = new Crate(new Vector<int>(5, 5)); collection.Add(crate); Parallel.For(0, 100, new Action<int>((i) => crate.Position.X += 1)); Crate same = collection[105, 5].First(); Assert.AreEqual(crate, same); } The actual stored position varies every time I run the test. I appreciate any feedback you may have.

    Read the article

  • Is there an equivalent for ActiveRecord#find_by equivalent for C#?

    - by Benjamin Manns
    I'm originally a C# developer (as a hobby), but as of late I have been digging into Ruby on Rails and I am really enjoying it. Right now I am building an application in C# and I was wondering if there is any collection implementation for C# that could match (or "semi-match") the find_by method of ActiveRecord. What I am essentially looking for is a list that would hold Rectangles: class Rectangle { public int Width { get; set; } public int Height { get; set; } public String Name { get; set; } } Where I could query this list and find all entries with Height = 10, Width = 20, or name = "Block". This was done with ActiveRecord by doing a call similar to Rectangle.find_by_name('Block'). The only way I can think of doing this in C# is to create my own list implementation and iterate through each item manually checking each item against the criteria. I fear I would be reinventing the wheel (and one of poorer quality). Any input or suggestions is much appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Populating and Using Dynamic Classes in C#/.NET 4.0

    - by Bob
    In our application we're considering using dynamically generated classes to hold a lot of our data. The reason for doing this is that we have customers with tables that have different structures. So you could have a customer table called "DOG" (just making this up) that contains the columns "DOGID", "DOGNAME", "DOGTYPE", etc. Customer #2 could have the same table "DOG" with the columns "DOGID", "DOG_FIRST_NAME", "DOG_LAST_NAME", "DOG_BREED", and so on. We can't create classes for these at compile time as the customer can change the table schema at any time. At the moment I have code that can generate a "DOG" class at run-time using reflection. What I'm trying to figure out is how to populate this class from a DataTable (or some other .NET mechanism) without extreme performance penalties. We have one table that contains ~20 columns and ~50k rows. Doing a foreach over all of the rows and columns to create the collection take about 1 minute, which is a little too long. Am I trying to come up with a solution that's too complex or am I on the right track? Has anyone else experienced a problem like this? Create dynamic classes was the solution that a developer at Microsoft proposed. If we can just populate this collection and use it efficiently I think it could work.

    Read the article

  • addAttributeToFilter and OR condition in Magento's Collection

    - by ÉricP
    Hi, I'd like to select products depending on several criteria from different attribute. I know how to user $collection->addAttributeToFilter('someattribute', array('like' => '%')); But I'd like to use several attribute for OR condition. Like: $collection->addAttributeToFilter('someattribute', array('like' => 'value'));` OR $collection->addAttributeToFilter('otherattribute', array('like' => 'value'));` To get products which either 'someattribute' OR 'otherattribute' set to 'value' Is it possible?

    Read the article

  • Initial capacity of collection types, i.e. Dictionary, List

    - by Neil N
    Certain collection types in .Net have an optional "Initial Capacity" constructor param. i.e. Dictionary<string, string> something = new Dictionary<string,string>(20); List<string> anything = new List<string>(50); I can't seem to find what the default initial capacity is for these objects on MSDN. If I know I will only be storing 12 or so items in a dictionary, doesn't it make sense to set the initial capacity to something like 20? My reasoning is, assuming the capacity grows like it does for a StringBuiler, which doubles each time the capacity is hit, and each re-allocation is costly, why not pre-set the size to something you know will hold your data, with some extra room just in case? If the initial capacity is 100, and I know I will only need a dozen or so, it seems as though the rest of that allocated RAM is allocated for nothing. Please spare me the "premature optimization" speil for the O(n^n)th time. I know it won't make my apps any faster or save any meaningful amount of memory, this is mostly out of curiosity.

    Read the article

  • Multiple indexes for a Java Collection - most basic solution?

    - by chris_l
    Hi, I'm looking for the most basic solution to create multiple indexes on a Java Collection. Required functionality: When a Value is removed, all index entries associated with that value must be removed. Index lookup must be faster than linear search (at least as fast as a TreeMap). Side conditions: It should ideally work with JavaSE (6.0) alone - no extra libraries, if possible. If necessary, then only small (not something like Lucene), common and well tested libraries. No database! Of course, I could write a class that manages multiple Maps myself. But I'd like to know, if it can be done without - while still getting a simple usage similar to using a single indexed java.util.Map. Thanks, Chris

    Read the article

  • scala 2.8 breakout

    - by oxbow_lakes
    In Scala 2.8, there is an object in scala.collection.package.scala: def breakOut[From, T, To](implicit b : CanBuildFrom[Nothing, T, To]) = new CanBuildFrom[From, T, To] { def apply(from: From) = b.apply() ; def apply() = b.apply() } I have been told that this results in: > import scala.collection.breakOut > val map : Map[Int,String] = List("London", "Paris").map(x => (x.length, x))(breakOut) map: Map[Int,String] = Map(6 -> London, 5 -> Paris) What is going on here? Why is breakOut being called as an argument to my List?

    Read the article

  • Java Double entry table

    - by Tom
    Hi, Does anyone know a double entry table implementation in java I can download ? I need to do something like this 1 2 3 _______ a| x y z b| h l m c| o a k table.get(a,1) would return x Of course, it should use any Object as key, value, etc Thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • Undo/Redo using Memento: Stack, Queue or just LinkedList?

    - by serhio
    What is the best having when implementing Memento pattern (for Undo/Redo) in witch collection to Keep Mementos? Basically, I need this(c = change, u = undo, r = redo): 0 *c -1 0 *c -2 -1 0 *c -3 -2 -1 0 <u -2 -1 0 1 *c -3 -2 -1 0 Variants: LinkedList - possible in principle, maybe not optimized. Queue - not adapted for this task, IMO. Stack - not adapted for undo AND redo; Double Stack - maybe optimal, but can't control the undo maximum size.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42  | Next Page >