Search Results

Search found 23821 results on 953 pages for 'mysql group by'.

Page 35/953 | < Previous Page | 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42  | Next Page >

  • MySQL Memory Limit Windows Server 2003

    - by Matt
    I am running MySQL 5.0.51a on Windows Server 2003 Standard Edition on an HP DL580 G4 with 3GB installed. One of my database tables has grown to 5.3 GB with an index file of 2.5 GB, which I believe is causing MySQL to be slow due to having to constantly load and unload the index file when updates are made to the table. The server itself seems to be performing OK because MySQL is only using about 500MB of memory (there are other apps running on the system, but MySQL uses the most memory). The table is fairly active with new records getting adding all during day but no deletes, ever. The MySQL server has up to 600 connections allowed, but only small number (10 or 20) would actually be writing to this table. I increased the memory limits in MySQL but since the max connections is so high I don't think I can give each connection 1GB without risking a problem. Is there some tuning that would let just certain connections get a lot of memory? So I have started to look for alternatives to avert the crisis I know is coming soon. Some of the options I have: Upgrade to Server 2003 Enterprise to install 64GB of memory. Question: would 32 bit MySQL be able to access more than 2GB? Would that be 2GB per thread? That would still be smaller than the index table size so it might not solve the problem completely, but it would be better than now. Upgrade to Server 200x 64 bit and MySQL 64 bit. Switch to a *nix 64 bit server. If anybody has suggestions for things to do in the meantime, opinions on which way to go, or other things that I have overlooked I would appreciate the help. Thanks

    Read the article

  • mysql cluster problem in ubuntu

    - by Firman
    I have a problem while installing and configuring mysql cluster runnign on ubuntu 10.10 This is configuration for Cluster management [NDBD DEFAULT] NoOfReplicas=2 DataMemory=10MB IndexMemory=25MB MaxNoOfTables=256 MaxNoOfOrderedIndexes=256 MaxNoOfUniqueHashIndexes=128 [MYSQLD DEFAULT] [NDB_MGMD DEFAULT] [TCP DEFAULT] [NDB_MGMD] Id=1 # the NDB Management Node (this one) HostName=192.168.10.101 [NDBD] Id=2 # the first NDB Data Node HostName=192.168.10.11 DataDir= /var/lib/mysql-cluster [NDBD] Id=3 # the second NDB Data Node HostName=192.168.10.12 DataDir=/var/lib/mysql-cluster [MYSQLD] [MYSQLD] and this is configuration for both node : [mysqld] ndbcluster ndb-connectstring=192.168.10.101 # the IP of the MANAGMENT (THIRD) SERVER [mysql_cluster] ndb-connectstring=192.168.10.101 # the IP of the MANAGMENT (THIRD) SERVER After running all node and management, and I use ndb_mgm, the type 'show' command, and something appear like this : ndb_mgm> show Connected to Management Server at: localhost:1186 Cluster Configuration --------------------- [ndbd(NDB)] 2 node(s) id=2 @192.168.10.11 (mysql-5.1.39 ndb-7.0.9, Nodegroup: 0, Master) id=3 @192.168.10.12 (mysql-5.1.39 ndb-7.0.9, Nodegroup: 0) [ndb_mgmd(MGM)] 1 node(s) id=1 @192.168.10.101 (mysql-5.1.39 ndb-7.0.9) [mysqld(API)] 1 node(s) id=4 (not connected, accepting connect from 192.168.10.101) look at two last line.. not as what http://dev.mysql.com/tech-resources/articles/mysql-cluster-for-two-servers.html look like (see at point 4) anyone have ever had this problem ?

    Read the article

  • Group vs role (Any real difference?)

    - by Ondrej
    Can anyone tell me, what's the real difference between group and role? Ive been trying to figure this out for some time now and the more information I read, the more I get the sence, that this is brought up just to confuse people and there is no proper difference in this. Both can do the other one's job. Ive always used a group to manage users and their access rights. Recently, I've come accross an administration software, where is a bunch of users. Each user can have assigned a module (whole system is split into a few parts called modules ie. Administration module, Survey module, Orders module, Customer module). On top of it, each module have a list of functionalities, that can be allowed or denied for each user. So let's say, a user John Smith can access module Orders and can edit any order, but havent given a right to delete any of them. If there was more users with the same competency, I would use a group to manage that. I would aggregate such users into the same group and assign access rights to modules and their functions to the group. All users in the same group would have the same access rights. Why call it a group and not role? I don't know, I just feel it that way. It seems to me, that simply it just doesnt really matter :] But I still would like to know the real difference. What about you guys? Any suggestions why this should be rather called role than group or the other way round? Thanks to everyone.

    Read the article

  • Log files for group policy application deployment

    - by Cyril
    I'm looking into using group policy to deploy a couple of applications. I want to have the log of each installation written to a shared folder on a file server for tracking purposes. I can create the log if I pass the appropriate parameters. For example: msiexec /i Package.msi /l*vx c:\Package.log However using group policy for the deployment, you can't pass any parameters to the installation file. Is there anyway to specify the log file location in the process of creating the msi package?

    Read the article

  • MySQL query from subquery not working

    - by James Goodwin
    I am trying to return a number based on the count of results from a table and to avoid having to count the results twice in the IF statement I am using a subquery. However I get a syntax error when trying to run the query, the subquery I have tested by itself runs fine. Any ideas what is wrong with the query? The syntax looks correct to me SELECT IF(daily_count>8000,0,IF(daily_count>6000,1,2)) FROM ( SELECT count(*) as daily_count FROM orders201003 WHERE DATE_FORMAT(date_sub(curdate(), INTERVAL 1 DAY),"%d-%m-%y") = DATE_FORMAT(reqDate,"%d-%m-%y") ) q

    Read the article

  • Problem installing MySQL gem on Fedora

    - by Shreyas Satish
    When I try rake db:migrate, I get the following error: !!! The bundled mysql.rb driver has been removed from Rails 2.2. Please install the mysql gem and try again: gem install mysql. rake aborted! no such file to load -- mysql And when I try to "gem install mysql" Building native extensions. This could take a while... ERROR: Error installing mysql: ERROR: Failed to build gem native extension. /usr/bin/ruby extconf.rb Can't find header files for ruby. Gem files will remain installed in /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mysql-2.8.1 for inspection. $ sudo gem install mysql -- --with-mysql-config=/usr/local/mysql/bin/mysql_config has also been tried but same error. I'm on a Fedora 10. Help will be much appreciated.Cheers!

    Read the article

  • mySQL date range problem

    - by StealthRT
    Hey all i am in need of a little help with figuring out how to get a range of days for my select query. Here is the code i am trying out: select id, idNumber, theDateStart, theDateEnd from clients WHERE idNumber = '010203' AND theDateStart >= '2010-04-09' AND theDateEnd <= '2010-04-09'; This is what the data in the table looks like: TheDateStart = 2010-04-09 TheDateEnd = 2010-04-11 When testing that code above, it does not populate anything. If i take out the TheEndDate, it populates but with some other tables data as well which it should not do (it should only get one record). I know the problem is within the two date's. I'm not sure how to go about getting a date range for theDateStart and theDateEnd since if someone tries it, say, on 2010-04-10, it still needs to know its within rage of the 2010-04-09 - 2010-04-11. But right now, it does not... Any help would be great! :o) David

    Read the article

  • mysql query the latest date

    - by user295189
    I am running this query SEL ECT sh.*, u.initials AS initals FROM database1.table1 AS sh JOIN database2.user AS u ON u.userID = sh.userid WHERE id = 123456 AND dts = ( SELECT MAX(dts) from database1.table1 ) ORDER BY sort_by, category In the table1 I have records like this dts status category sort_by 2010-04-29 12:20:27 Civil Engineers Occupation 1 2010-04-28 12:20:27 Civil Engineers Occupation 1 2010-04-28 12:20:54 Married Marital Status 2 2010-04-28 12:21:15 Smoker Tobbaco 3 2010-04-27 12:20:27 Civil Engineers Occupation 1 2010-04-27 12:20:54 Married Marital Status 2 2010-04-27 12:21:15 Smoker Tobbaco 3 2010-04-26 12:20:27 Civil Engineers Occupation 1 2010-04-26 12:20:54 Married Marital Status 2 2010-04-26 12:21:15 Smoker Tobbaco 3 so if you look at my data, I am choosing the latest entry by category and sort_id. however in some case such as on 29th (2010-04-29 12:20:27) I have only one record. So in this case I want to show occupation for latest and then the rest of them (latest). But currently it displays only one row. Thanks

    Read the article

  • Simple Select Statement on MySQL Database Hanging

    - by AlishahNovin
    I have a very simple sql select statement on a very large table, that is non-normalized. (Not my design at all, I'm just trying to optimize while simultaneously trying to convince the owners of a redesign) Basically, the statement is like this: SELECT FirstName, LastName, FullName, State FROM Activity Where (FirstName=@name OR LastName=@name OR FullName=@name) AND State=@state; Now, FirstName, LastName, FullName and State are all indexed as BTrees, but without prefix - the whole column is indexed. State column is a 2 letter state code. What I'm finding is this: When @name = 'John Smith', and @state = '%' the search is really fast and yields results immediately. When @name = 'John Smith', and @state = 'FL' the search takes 5 minutes (and usually this means the web service times out...) When I remove the FirstName and LastName comparisons, and only use the FullName and State, both cases above work very quickly. When I replace FirstName, LastName, FullName, and State searches, but use LIKE for each search, it works fast for @name='John Smith%' and @state='%', but slow for @name='John Smith%' and @state='FL' When I search against 'John Sm%' and @state='FL' the search finds results immediately When I search against 'John Smi%' and @state='FL' the search takes 5 minutes. Now, just to reiterate - the table is not normalized. The John Smith appears many many times, as do many other users, because there is no reference to some form of users/people table. I'm not sure how many times a single user may appear, but the table itself has 90 Million records. Again, not my design... What I'm wondering is - though there are many many problems with this design, what is causing this specific problem. My guess is that the index trees are just too large that it just takes a very long time traversing the them. (FirstName, LastName, FullName) Anyway, I appreciate anyone's help with this. Like I said, I'm working on convincing them of a redesign, but in the meantime, if I someone could help me figure out what the exact problem is, that'd be fantastic.

    Read the article

  • Optimize this MySQL query?

    - by HipHop-opatamus
    The following query takes FOREVER to execute (30+ hrs on a Macbook w/4gig ram) - I'm looking for ways to make it run more efficiently. Any thoughts are appreciated! CREATE TABLE fc AS SELECT threadid, title, body, date, userlogin FROM f WHERE pid NOT IN (SELECT pid FROM ft) ORDER BY date; (table "f" is ~1 Gig / 1,843,000 row, table "ft" is 168mb, 216,000 rows) )

    Read the article

  • Two n x m relationships with the same table in mysql

    - by Christian
    I want to create a database in which there's an n x m relationship between the table drug and the table article and an n x m relationship between the table target and the table article. I get the error: Cannot delete or update a parent row: a foreign key constraint fails What do I have to change in my code? DROP TABLE IF EXISTS `textmine`.`article`; CREATE TABLE `textmine`.`article` ( `id` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT COMMENT 'Pubmed ID', `abstract` blob NOT NULL, `authors` blob NOT NULL, `journal` varchar(256) CHARACTER SET utf8 COLLATE utf8_bin NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`id`) ) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8; DROP TABLE IF EXISTS `textmine`.`drugs`; CREATE TABLE `textmine`.`drugs` ( `id` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL COMMENT 'This ID is taken from the biosemantics dictionary', `primaryName` varchar(256) CHARACTER SET utf8 COLLATE utf8_bin NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`id`) ) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8; DROP TABLE IF EXISTS `textmine`.`targets`; CREATE TABLE `textmine`.`targets` ( `id` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, `primaryName` varchar(256) CHARACTER SET utf8 COLLATE utf8_bin NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`id`) ) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8; DROP TABLE IF EXISTS `textmine`.`containstarget`; CREATE TABLE `textmine`.`containstarget` ( `targetid` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL, `articleid` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL, KEY `target` (`targetid`), KEY `article` (`articleid`), CONSTRAINT `article` FOREIGN KEY (`articleid`) REFERENCES `article` (`id`), CONSTRAINT `target` FOREIGN KEY (`targetid`) REFERENCES `targets` (`id`) ) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8; DROP TABLE IF EXISTS `textmine`.`contiansdrug`; CREATE TABLE `textmine`.`contiansdrug` ( `drugid` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL, `articleid` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL, KEY `drug` (`drugid`), KEY `article` (`articleid`), CONSTRAINT `article` FOREIGN KEY (`articleid`) REFERENCES `article` (`id`), CONSTRAINT `drug` FOREIGN KEY (`drugid`) REFERENCES `drugs` (`id`) ) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;

    Read the article

  • How do I handle mysql replication in EC2 using private IPs?

    - by chris
    I am trying to set up a mysql master/slave configuration in two EC2 instances. However, every time I reboot an instance, the IP address (and hostname) changes. I could assign an Elastic IP address, but would prefer to use the internal IP address. I can't be the first person to do this, but I can't seem to find a solution. There are a lot of "getting started" guides, but none of them mention how to handle changing IP addresses. So what are the best practices to manage master/slave replication in EC2?

    Read the article

  • Help with MySQL query - Product orders report without duplicate shipping charges

    - by Paul
    Hello, I have an issue creating a custom report for an e-commerce store running on osCommerce. The client wants the report to have the following columns: Date, Order ID, Product Class, Product Price, Product Tax, Shipping, Order Total The criteria for generating the report are Date Range and Product Class (Textbooks for example) The client wants the report to list each Textbook purchased on its own line. Orders with multiple textbooks would display a separate line for each Textbook in the order. I have it all working except for one part: the shipping amount is order-specific (based on the order total), not product-specific, and is displaying for each product. I need it to display only for the first product of each order, so it is not counted more than once. My current query is: SELECT op.date_funds_captured as 'Date', op.orders_id as 'Order ID', pc.class as 'Product Class', round(op.products_price,2) as 'Product Price', round(op.products_tax*op.products_price/100,2) as 'Product Tax', round(otship.value,2) as 'Shipping', round(ot.value,2) as 'Order Total' from orders_products op, orders_total ot, orders_total otship, productclasses pc, products p where ot.orders_id = op.orders_id and ot.class='ot_total' and op.orders_id = otship.orders_id and otship.class = 'ot_shipping' and p.products_class_id = pc.id and op.products_id = p.products_id and pc.id = 1 pc.id = 1 -- Product class = Textbook Here is an example of the current report output. You can see the problem with order 2256 showing the shipping value three times instead of once: Date Order Product Class Price Tax Shipping Total 2010-01-04 2253 Textbook 24.95 2.43 10.03 37.41 2010-01-04 2256 Textbook 34.95 0.00 18.09 240.37 2010-01-04 2256 Textbook 55.50 0.00 18.09 240.37 2010-01-04 2256 Textbook 36.95 0.00 18.09 240.37 2010-01-04 2258 Textbook 55.50 5.41 12.17 124.24 Please help!!! Thanks, Paul

    Read the article

  • MySQL Trigger with Update

    - by Matthew
    I'm trying to update a row when it gets updated to keep one of the columns consistant, CREATE TRIGGER user_country BEFORE UPDATE ON user_billing FOR EACH ROW BEGIN IF NEW.billing_country = OLD.billing_country AND NEW.country_id != OLD.country_id THEN SET NEW.billing_country = cms.country.country_name WHERE cms.country.country_id = NEW.country_id; END IF; END But I keep recieving error #1064, Is there a way to update a row based on another row's data when the row is getting updated?

    Read the article

  • mysql PDO how to bind LIKE

    - by dmontain
    In this query select wrd from tablename WHERE wrd LIKE '$partial%' I'm trying to bind the variable '$partial%' with PDO. Not sure how this works with the % at the end. Would it be select wrd from tablename WHERE wrd LIKE ':partial%' where :partial is bound to $partial="somet" or would it be select wrd from tablename WHERE wrd LIKE ':partial' where :partial is bound to $partial="somet%" or would it be something entirely different?

    Read the article

  • MySQL : AVG of AVG impossible ?

    - by Tristan
    Hi, I want to do an average : the problem is for 1 item i'm calculating the AVG of each elements (working) but as soon as i want the GLOBAL average the average of the elements (something and foo) it doesn't work. I need to do that because i want to sort the result by the global average SELECT AVG(AVG(something)+AVG(foo)) /2 as moy ..... ORDER BY moy DESC Thanks,

    Read the article

  • MySQL Need help constructing query: join multiple tables into single row

    - by Jed Daniels
    Hello stackoverflowers, Forgive me if this question has been asked and answered, I've searched and found a few that look similar but I'm too much of a novice with SQL to adapt them to my needs. Also forgive me if I don't use the correct terminology, I know it can be annoying when someone asks a question and they don't even know enough to be able to ask for what they need. I'm helping a friend gather some data, and need to perform a query that results in a single row per record, but instead I get multiple rows. Here is an example of what I'm querying right now (simplified, hopefully not too much): SELECT * FROM `table_one` AS t1 INNER JOIN `table_two` AS t2 ON t1.id = t2.id INNER JOIN `table_three` AS t3 ON t1.id = t3.id WHERE 1 The result is: id text number 5 Subtotal 17 5 Tax 3 5 Total 20 What I need is to create a query that results in something more like this: id text number text number text number 5 subtotal 17 Tax 3 Total 20 Any assistance/guidance would be much appreciated. Thanks! --jed

    Read the article

  • MySQL function: Rotate old entries to archive table

    - by confiq
    Hi, I'm looking for the function that will take rows older then X days and put it in archive table... Was thinking to make function so it will be easer to execute... something like CREATE TABLE archive_NUMBER_OF_WEEK (...); INSERT INTO archive_NUMBER_OF_WEEK SELECT * FROM content WHERE DATE < X days; DELETE * FROM content WHERE DATE < X days RENAME TABLE content TO content_backup, content_temp TO content; Will post when I finish it :)

    Read the article

  • mysql partitioning

    - by Yang
    just want to verify that database partition is implemented only at the database level, when we query a partitioned table, we still do our normal query, nothing special with our queries, the optimization is performed automatically when parsing the query, is that correct? e.g. we have a table called 'address' with a column called 'country_code' and 'city'. so if i want to get all the addresses in New York, US, normally i wound do something like this: select * from address where country_code = 'US' and city = 'New York' if now the table is partitioned by 'country_code', and i know that now the query will only be executed on the partition which contains country_code = US. My question is do I need to explicitly specify the partition to query in my sql statement? or i still use the previous statement and the db server will optimize it automatically? Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • Get Auto Increment value with MySQL query

    - by James Simpson
    I currently have a database with over 6 million rows and growing. I currently do SELECT COUNT(id) FROM table; in order to display the number to my users, but the database is getting large and I have no need to store all of those rows except to be able to show the number. Is there a way to select the auto_increment value to display so that I can clear out most of the rows in the database? Using LAST_INSERT_ID() doesn't seem to work.

    Read the article

  • MYSQL update query php

    - by bell
    I am trying to use an update query to change values held in a database, the new values I am trying to store are held in php variables. I'm not sure what it is I'm doing wrong. mysql_query("UPDATE user SET status='full' WHERE user_id = '$user_id'")or die(mysql_error()); thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • MySql SELECT AS - Append all field names

    - by jeerose
    I'd like to do something like this: SELECT table.id AS prefix_id, table.name AS prefix_name ... and have the prefix added dynamically to all field names rather than selecting them all manually (ie SELECT table.* AS prefix_* or something) Hopefully I've described that accurately. Any thoughts? Edit To be clear, the reason I'm asking is to make sure that my query result contains every column from each table I call even if there are duplicate field names. For example, I might have a table with lots of fields which means I don't want to alias all the fields manually. Further if 3 tables have a field called name my result won't contain three name results; it will have one. I want to avoid ambiguity with my column names.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42  | Next Page >