Search Results

Search found 4091 results on 164 pages for 'intel core2'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 36/164 | < Previous Page | 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43  | Next Page >

  • AMD : des puces à trois et quatre coeurs pour PC portables et une baisse des prix pour contrer Intel

    Mise à jour du 12/05/10 AMD : des puces à trois et quatre coeurs pour portables Et une baisse des prix pour contrer Intel AMD vient de dévoiler des puces triple-coeurs et quadri-coeurs spécialement destinés au marché des Notebooks. Ces puces Phenom II tourneront à une vitesse allant entre 1.6GHz et 2.3GHz. Elles visent bien évidemment à essayer de contrer la concurrence de plus en plus virulente d'Intel qui devrait, de son coté, lancer une gamme de puces entre ses Atoms (pour Netbooks) et ses Core i5/i3 (pour desktop) spécialement conçues pour ce marché des portables hybrides. Rappelons que les Notebooks ...

    Read the article

  • Which drivers do I need for Ethernet and CAN bus on Intel Tolapai?

    - by Hanno Fietz
    I've installed 10.04 Server on an embedded machine (NISE 110 by Nexcom) and the builtin Ethernet and CAN-bus controllers don't work out of the box. The controller seems to be an Intel EP80579 chipset for both, according to lspci. I tried Intel's product website, where they seem to have FreeBSD drivers only. There's also drivers for RedHat, but I'm struggling with the manual build required to get them to work. Googling so far didn't get me anywhere. Which drivers do I need, and where do I get them?

    Read the article

  • Les premières puces Sandy Bridge corrigées ont été livrées, la rapidité d'Intel rassure les constructeurs de cartes mère

    Les premières puces Sandy Bridge corrigées ont été livrées, la rapidité d'Intel rassure les constructeurs de cartes mère Mise à jour du 21.02.2011 par Katleen Intel semble avoir tenu ses engagements, à savoir livrer ses nouveau chipset (en remplacement des défectueux) à la fin février. Le second mois de l'année touche à sa fin et les premières puces de ce type viendraient d'être livrées. Le constructeur MSI a en effet déclaré en avoir reçu la première fournée, et s'atteler dès à présente à la réparation et au remplacement des cartes mères défectueuses concernées par le rappel. Les composants ainsi mis à jour porteront une étiquette indiquant "MSI B3 Stepping Ready...

    Read the article

  • Intel dément trouver Windows 8 pas assez finalisé, l'OS serait même l'une des meilleures choses qui soient arrivées à la société

    Windows 8 ne serait pas encore finalisé pour le patron d'Intel qui estime que des améliorations sont encore nécessaires Microsoft va officiellement lancer Windows 8 le 26 octobre avec une nouvelle génération de tablettes et PC fonctionnant sous le système d'exploitation. Mais, il semblerait que l'OS ne soit pas encore totalement finalisé. C'est en tout cas ce que pense Paul Otellini, le PDG d'Intel, selon un article Bloomberg. Le patron du constructeur de microprocesseurs qui est le partenaire le plus proche de Microsoft aurait déclaré lors d'une réunion privée avec son équipe de Taïwan que Windows 8 va être lancé avant d'être finalisé. D'un point de vu comm...

    Read the article

  • "Meilleur premier trimestre de tous les temps" pour Intel, AMD dans le vert : retour de la croissan

    Mise à jour du 26/01/10 "Meilleur premier trimestre de tous les temps" pour Intel AMD repasse dans le vert dans un contexte favorable : des résultats qui annoncent le fin de la crise ou simple trompe-l'oeil ? Intel vient d'annoncer un résultat trimestriel record, "le meilleur premier trimestre de tous les temps" (en vo : "best first quarter ever") pour la société. Avec un bénéfice net de 2,4 milliards pour un chiffre d'affaires de plus de 10 milliards, le résultat de ce premier trimestre est en progression de plus de 280 % par rapport à la même période de 2009. Les lancements des modèles Co...

    Read the article

  • Intel annonce une puce pour serveurs composée de 32 coeurs, faisant partie de sa future gamme de pro

    Mise à jour du 02.06.2010 par Katleen Intel annonce une puce pour serveurs composée de 32 coeurs, faisant partie de sa future gamme de produits Knights Intel vient d'annoncer une puce pour serveurs composée de 32 coeurs, cadencés à 1.2 GHz, élaborée sur une architecture mêlant des coeurs x86 ainsi que d'autres spécialisés pour répondre aux besoins spécifiques des serveurs à haute performance. Répondant au nom de Knights Ferry, ce processeur est "le plus rapide pouvant traiter plus de 500 Gigaflops de données", d'après son constructeur. Il marque les premiers pas d'une gamme destinée aux serveurs (Knights), qui repose sur une architecture MIC (Many Integrated Cores). Les proce...

    Read the article

  • Boost binding a function taking a reference

    - by Jamie Cook
    Hi all, I am having problems compiling the following snippet int temp; vector<int> origins; vector<string> originTokens = OTUtils::tokenize(buffer, ","); // buffer is a char[] array // original loop BOOST_FOREACH(string s, originTokens) { from_string(temp, s); origins.push_back(temp); } // I'd like to use this to replace the above loop std::transform(originTokens.begin(), originTokens.end(), origins.begin(), boost::bind<int>(&FromString<int>, boost::ref(temp), _1)); where the function in question is // the third parameter should be one of std::hex, std::dec or std::oct template <class T> bool FromString(T& t, const std::string& s, std::ios_base& (*f)(std::ios_base&) = std::dec) { std::istringstream iss(s); return !(iss >> f >> t).fail(); } the error I get is 1>Compiling with Intel(R) C++ 11.0.074 [IA-32]... (Intel C++ Environment) 1>C:\projects\svn\bdk\Source\deps\boost_1_42_0\boost/bind/bind.hpp(303): internal error: assertion failed: copy_default_arg_expr: rout NULL, no error (shared/edgcpfe/il.c, line 13919) 1> 1> return unwrapper<F>::unwrap(f, 0)(a[base_type::a1_], a[base_type::a2_]); 1> ^ 1> 1>icl: error #10298: problem during post processing of parallel object compilation Google is being unusually unhelpful so I hope that some one here can provide some insights.

    Read the article

  • Flushing writes in buffer of Memory Controller to DDR device

    - by Rohit
    At some point in my code, I need to push the writes in my code all the way to the DIMM or DDR device. My requirement is to ensure the write reaches the row,ban,column of the DDR device on the DIMM. I need to read what I've written to the main memory. I do not want caching to get me the value. Instead after writing I want to fetch this value from main memory(DIMM's). So far I've been using Intel's x86 instruction wbinvd(write back and invalidate cache). However this means the caches and TLB are flushed. Write-back requests go to the main memory. However, there is a reasonable amount of time this data might reside in the write buffer of the Memory Controller( Intel calls it integrated memory controller or IMC). The Memory Controller might take some more time depending on the algorithm that runs in the Memory Controller to handle writes. Is there a way I force all existing or pending writes in the write buffer of the memory controller to the DRAM devices ?? What I am looking for is something more direct and more low-level than wbinvd. If you could point me to right documents or specs that describe this I would be grateful. Generally, the IMC has a several registers which can be written or read from. From looking at the specs for that for the chipset I could not find anything useful. Thanks for taking the time to read this.

    Read the article

  • Backtrack, Wi-Fi not working

    - by hradecek
    I've installed Backtrack 5R3 KDE, and I realized that my wireless is not working, but wired is working fine. Here's the lshw output: *-network description: Ethernet interface product: RTL8101E/RTL8102E PCI Express Fast Ethernet controller vendor: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. physical id: 0 bus info: pci@0000:02:00.0 logical name: eth0 version: 05 serial: 04:7d:7b:b7:46:f8 size: 100MB/s capacity: 100MB/s width: 64 bits clock: 33MHz capabilities: pm msi pciexpress msix vpd bus_master cap_list ethernet physical tp mii 10bt 10bt-fd 100bt 100bt-fd autonegotiation configuration: autonegotiation=on broadcast=yes driver=r8169 driverversion=2.3LK-NAPI duplex=full firmware=rtl_nic/rtl8105e-1.fw ip=192.168.2.2 latency=0 link=yes multicast=yes port=MII speed=100MB/s resources: irq:42 ioport:2000(size=256) memory:f0404000-f0404fff memory:f0400000-f0403fff lspci output: 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 2nd Generation Core Processor Family DRAM Controller (rev 09) 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 2nd Generation Core Processor Family Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 09) 00:14.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation Panther Point USB xHCI Host Controller (rev 04) 00:16.0 Communication controller: Intel Corporation Panther Point MEI Controller #1 (rev 04) 00:1a.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation Panther Point USB Enhanced Host Controller #2 (rev 04) 00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation Panther Point High Definition Audio Controller (rev 04) 00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Panther Point PCI Express Root Port 1 (rev c4) 00:1c.1 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Panther Point PCI Express Root Port 2 (rev c4) 00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation Panther Point USB Enhanced Host Controller #1 (rev 04) 00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation Panther Point LPC Controller (rev 04) 00:1f.2 SATA controller: Intel Corporation Panther Point 6 port SATA AHCI Controller (rev 04) 00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corporation Panther Point SMBus Controller (rev 04) 02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8101E/RTL8102E PCI Express Fast Ethernet controller (rev 05)

    Read the article

  • Core i5 Turboboost/C states Freezing computer

    - by Aaron Smith
    I'm not sure which, but I just had a heck of a time getting my computer to boot up and not freeze. It would run until it finished booting windows, then everything would freeze. This happened until I turned off turboboost and all the c states on the processor. What could be causing this? Is the processor going bad?

    Read the article

  • xenserver 5.5 windows guest

    - by maruti
    xenserver 5.5 update2 running on Pentium-D without VT. says it cant support Windows guests(HVM not found etc) on the same CPU ESXi 4 installed and runs Win XP fine. any thoughts? thanks in adv.

    Read the article

  • All paths down on vSphere esxi 5.1, LSI 9211-8i

    - by user1434058
    Works 100% ESXi 5.1 HBA (LSI 1064e) 1x SAS2 100GB SSD Doesn't work ESXi 5.1 HBA (LSI 9211-8i IT /IBM M1015) 1x SAS2 100GB SSD After a few hours of heavy HD load i get: - Device or filesystem with identifier ['all drives'] has entered the All Paths Down state. - ESXi retries but loses connectivity to the SAS drive, marks it as "dead or error" - reboot fixes the issue How can i fix this issue?

    Read the article

  • Error Message: Primary Slave Drive - ATAPI Incompatible

    - by Jaleel Dwight
    So I recently switched towers and now, all of a sudden, I'm getting this error message as soon as I boot my system. The error message reads "Primary Slave Drive - ATAPI Incompatible". This has really been frustrating since there's NO Primary Slave Drive even installed in my computer!! I have one hard drive installed which is recognized as the Primary Master & a DVD Drive which is recognized as the Secondary Master. My old system ran flawlessly. I'm beginning to think maybe my motherboard is bugging out cuz I fail to understand how it can be telling me that a "nonexistent" drive is incompatible. Any suggestions??

    Read the article

  • Socket 1155 vs 2011 vs Haswell

    - by woody
    The title says it all. I am trying to decide between sockets and just cant pinpoint which to get based on pros and cons. The build this will go into will be my primary PC. It will be used for every day computing, coding, some multimedia and gaming. I have read that 1155 and 2011 will be dead within the new year and that Haswell will double the performance of Ivy Bridge. What is a general run down on the different sockets? Pros and Cons? More specifically what are the technical differences between the three?

    Read the article

  • Core i7 on linux loses its multithreading capability after suspend

    - by rafak
    On my debian-linux system, with a core i7 920 , each time I resume after the command "pm-suspend" (suspend to RAM), mutlithreading capabilities almost disappear. More specifically, two distinct programs can use 2 distinct cores at full rate, but a single program is limited to only one core (for one instance of a multithreaded program as well as multiple instances of a monothreaded program, e.g. "make -j 4" for gcc). So I end up rebooting the system. Any help appreciated!

    Read the article

  • How to install QEMU on Damn Small Linux?

    - by user2934303
    i'm trying to install QEMU on a Damn Small Linux installation in order to emulate pentium features in a 486 computer. Though DSL was descontinued, it's the only linux that runs reasonably on the 486 processor, most recent kernels doesn't even boot on 486 architecture. I tried Tiny Core Linux, but it doesn't work in 486, so i seem to have no escape here. The most recent image of DSL is from 2008, it uses kernel 2.4.x, and i couldn't find a way to compile QEMU on it. Firstly, it lacks several compile tools needed for compiling it, and, it have several dependency problems. I tried some pre-compiled packages, but the only one that worked was a QEMU 5.2 RPM package (it didn't had dependency problems), and it was way too old, it wasn't capable of running windows yet, it just gave me the option of emulating a code, not a full OS as windows, and it also didn't give me the option to choose which architecture i wanted it to emulate (-cpu option). Can anyone help me with this? Also, if someone can think of some alternative to it, i'd be grateful. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • More RAM in motherboard than CPU can process

    - by Videographer Francisco Ferrer
    As I understand reading in the forum post :" By making more memory available to the system more data can be cached in RAM, so there will be less hard drive activity, and less swapping to memory so your system will perform better." But what happen when motherboard for a desktop that supports( and had install) more RAM than the procesor can handle?(aka:procesor Max Memory Size). Is there any advantage to have a MB that hold a bigger RAM capacity than the CPU? If so, how can this be translate using in a program like Adobe After Effects, RAM preview? thanks

    Read the article

  • Core i7 & x58 overclocking?

    - by user9611
    Is there any problem overclocking the Core i7 chip on an x58 mb with you have all 6 memory slots filled? I just heard somewhere that if you want to overclock you should stick to 3 modules? Is there any truth to this? thanks, Ncage

    Read the article

  • Can I put a laptop Core i7 CPU in a desktop?

    - by Weezy
    One of the most important thing to me for a CPU is a good mix between speed and heat. For example five years ago I bought a Core 2 Duo 6300 (max TDP 65W): I put a big heatsink on the CPU, no fans (I do hate moving parts and noise) and it worked like a charm and very silently for five years (and it still work but five years later I wouldn't mind a faster CPU and a faster memory controller and more memory). I consider a max TDP of 130W unacceptable (like some high-end Core i7 have), for several reasons. So I was wondering: can I build a desktop and put a Core i7 CPU meant to be used in laptop in it? For example I was thinking about the Core i7 740QM (max TDP 45W [!]). Are these compatible with desktop Core i7 motherboards? (for example on NewEgg it says that the "CPU socket type" for the Core i7 740QM is PGA988, I've not too sure about what this is)

    Read the article

  • Core i7 920 vs 870

    - by JL
    I am not sure which is better. Surely with processors you would think the 920 would be a higher version because 920 870. What's bothering me is that the 870 seems to have a higher clock speed, so which one is the better processor?

    Read the article

  • Passive cooling a Pentium III

    - by gravyface
    Looking at running pfSense on an old P3 866Mhz. It's noisy, I'd like to passively-cool it, downclocking is ok as this is more than enough horsepower for my needs at home. Obviously I'm cheaping out here: wonder if I bigger heatsink will do and how much case flow I need (it's in a standard mid-tower ATX case).

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43  | Next Page >