Search Results

Search found 12437 results on 498 pages for 'normal mapping'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 36/498 | < Previous Page | 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43  | Next Page >

  • SQL only row mapping record fetching

    - by Prasanna
    I have a customer call detail table in which call details of all customer stored. I have to find out the distinct aparty (means our customer ) who only calls our customers (means bparty also be our numbers) . There is no other domestic call , International calls made by A party (our customer) in this case. could you people please help me to find the same data. FILE INPUT oF SAMPLE CDR TABLE ROW NAME VALUES ANUMBER :-any mobile number(Domestic+International); for our customer it must like 70,070,0070,9370) BNUMBER :-any mobile number(Domestic+International); for our customer it must like 70,070,0070,9370 CALLTRANSACTION :-eg: 91,92,93 etc CALLTRANSACTIONTYPEC :-eg: MOC,MTC FILENAME :-MCS_01 etc TIME:- any time value Required Output DISTINCT ANUMBER :-for our customer it mobile number must start with 70 or 070 or 0070 or 9370 BNUMBER :- for our customer it mobile number must start with 70 or 070 or 0070 or 9370 means our customer only calls to our network customer ( No other doestic call or international calls made by our operator)

    Read the article

  • How to keep Hibernate mapping use under control as requirements grow

    - by David Plumpton
    I've worked on a number of Java web apps where persistence is via Hibernate, and we start off with some central class (e.g. an insurance application) without any time being spent considering how to break things up into manageable chunks. Over time as features are added we add more mappings (rates, clients, addresses, etc.) and then amount of time spent saving and loading an insurance object and everything it connects to grows. In particular you get close to a go-live date and performance testing with larger amounts of data in each table is starting to demonstrate that it's all too slow. Obviously there are a number of ways that we could attempt to partition things up, e.g. map only the client classes for the client CRUD screens, etc., which would have been better to get in place earlier rather than trying to work it in at the end of the dev cycle. I'm just wondering if there are recommendations about ways to handle/mitigate this.

    Read the article

  • Resource mapping in a Ruby on Rails URL (RESTful API)

    - by randombits
    I'm having a bit of difficulty coming up with the right answer to this, so I will solicit my problem here. I'm working on a RESTFul API. Naturally, I have multiple resources, some of which consist of parent to child relationships, some of which are stand alone resources. Where I'm having a bit of difficulty is figuring out how to make things easier for the folks who will be building clients against my API. The situation is this. Hypothetically I have a 'Street' resource. Each street has multiple homes. So Street :has_many to Homes and Homes :belongs_to Street. If a user wants to request an HTTP GET on a specific home resource, the following should work: http://mymap/streets/5/homes/10 That allows a user to get information for a home with the id 10. Straight forward. My question is, am I breaking the rules of the book by giving the user access to: http://mymap/homes/10 Technically that home resource exists on its own without the street. It makes sense that it exists as its own entity without an encapsulating street, even though business logic says otherwise. What's the best way to handle this?

    Read the article

  • URL Mapping prefix in Grails

    - by Furuno
    Recently, I'm trying to migrating my application from CakePHP to Grails. So far it's been a smooth sailing, everything I can do with CakePHP, I can do it with much less code in Grails. However, I have one question : In CakePHP, there's an URL Prefix feature that enables you to give prefix to a certain action url, for example, if I have these actions in my controller : PostController admin_add admin_edit admin_delete I can simply access it from the URL : mysite/admin/post/add mysite/admin/post/edit/1 mysite/admin/post/delete/2 instead of: mysite/post/admin_add mysite/post/admin_edit/1 mysite/post/admin_delete/2 Is there anyway to do this in Grails, or at least alternative of doing this?

    Read the article

  • Constant in Hibernate Mapping Files

    - by bertolami
    I would like to add a value object to a mapped class where one column is fixed depending of the class that contains the component. How can I do something like this? <component name="aComponent"> <property name="abc" column="cde"/> <property name="xyz" value="FIXED"/> </component> Unfortunatly, the value attribute does not exist. Is there another way to apply a constant value to property? Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • Interface -> Entity Mapping

    - by KiD0M4N
    Hi guys, Suppose I have a few definitions like so: public interface ICategory { int ID { get; set; } string Name { get; set; } ICategory Parent { get; set; } } public class Category : ICategory { public virtual int ID { get; set; } public virtual string Name { get; set; } public virtual ICategory Parent { get; set; } } How do I map such a scenario in NHibernate? I am trying to separate the implementation of the DAL. I am learning NHibernate. Regards, Karan

    Read the article

  • Url mapping with my servlet?

    - by user291701
    Hi, I'm using GWT with GAE. When the user enters any of the following urls, I want to just serve my app as usual to them: http://www.mysite.com/ http://www.mysite.com/dog http://www.mysite.com/cat the first case works by default. I'm not sure how to get the /dog and /cat cases to work. I think I have to modify something with the url mappings to get that to work in web.xml. Essentially I'm trying to just get my app served with any url entered: http://www.mysite.com/* Thanks

    Read the article

  • Spring data mapping problem.

    - by Yashwant Chavan
    Hi, I am using spring and hibernate along with my different components There is date field in DB as contract_end_date as a Date , so my pojo also contains date getter setter for contract_end_date, but when i submit form to Multiaction controller it gives data bindding exception for contract_end_date. It trying to search string getter setter for contract_end_date. So is there is any solution to handle this kind of problem. This is my pojo. after sumitting the form getting data binding exception public class Clnt implements java.io.Serializable { private String clntId; private String clntNm; private String busUnitNm; private String statCd; private String cmntTx; private Date contractEndDt; }

    Read the article

  • mapping list of different types implementing same function?

    - by sisif
    I want to apply a function to every element in a list (map) but the elements may have different types but all implement the same function (here "putOut") like an interface. However I cannot create a list of this "interface" type (here "Outputable"). How do I map a list of different types implementing the same function? main :: IO () main = do map putOut lst putStrLn "end" where lst :: [Outputable] -- ERROR: Class "Outputable" used as a type lst = [(Out1 1),(Out2 1 2)] class Outputable a where putOut :: a -> IO () -- user defined: data Out1 = Out1 Int deriving (Show) data Out2 = Out2 Int deriving (Show) instance Outputable Out1 where putOut out1 = putStrLn $ show out1 instance Outputable Out2 where putOut out2 = putStrLn $ show out2 I cannot define it this way: data Out = Out1 Int | Out2 Int Int putOut Out1 = ... putOut Out2 = ... because this is a library and users should be able to extend Out with their own types

    Read the article

  • Rack URL Mapping

    - by Puru puru rin..
    Hi, I am trying to write two kind of Rack routes. Rack allow us to write such routes like so: app = Rack::URLMap.new('/test' => SimpleAdapter.new, '/files' => Rack::File.new('.')) In my case, I would like to handle those routes: "/" or "index" "/*" in order to match any other routes So I had trying this: app = Rack::URLMap.new('/index' => SimpleAdapter.new, '/' => Rack::File.new('./public')) This works well, but... I don't know how to add '/' path (as alternative of '/index' path). The path '/*' is not interpreted as a wildcard, according to my tests. Do you know how I could do? Thanks

    Read the article

  • mapping 'value object' collection in (Fluent) NHibernate

    - by adrin
    I have the following entity public class Employee { public virtual int Id {get;set;} public virtual ISet<Hour> XboxBreakHours{get;set} public virtual ISet<Hour> CoffeeBreakHours {get;set} } public class Hour { public DateTime Time {get;set;} } (What I want to do here is store information that employee A plays Xbox everyday let's say at 9:00 13:30 and has a coffee break everyday at 7:00 12:30 18:00) - I am not sure if my approach is valid at all here. The question is how should my (ideally fluent) mappings look like here? It is not necessary (from my point of view) for Hour class to have Id or be accessible from some kind of repository.

    Read the article

  • Advice on Linq to SQL mapping object design

    - by fearofawhackplanet
    I hope the title and following text are clear, I'm not very familiar with the correct terms so please correct me if I get anything wrong. I'm using Linq ORM for the first time and am wondering how to address the following. Say I have two DB tables: User ---- Id Name Phone ----- Id UserId Model The Linq code generator produces a bunch of entity classes. I then write my own classes and interfaces which wrap these Linq classes: class DatabaseUser : IUser { public DatabaseUser(User user) { _user = user; } public Guid Id { get { return _user.Id; } } ... etc } so far so good. Now it's easy enough to find a users phones from Phones.Where(p => p.User = user) but surely comsumers of the API shouldn't need to be writing their own Linq queries to get at data, so I should wrap this query in a function or property somewhere. So the question is, in this example, would you add a Phones property to IUser or not? In other words, should my interface specifically be modelling my database objects (in which case Phones doesn't belong in IUser), or are they actually simply providing a set of functions and properties which are conceptually associated with a User (in which case it does)? There seems drawbacks to both views, but I'm wondering if there is a standard approach to the problem. Or just any general words of wisdom you could share. My first thought was to use extension methods but in fact that doesn't work in this case.

    Read the article

  • Mapping over multiple Seq in Scala

    - by bsdfish
    Suppose I have val foo : Seq[Double] = ... val bar : Seq[Double] = ... and I wish to produce a seq where the baz(i) = foo(i) + bar(i). One way I can think of to do this is val baz : Seq[Double] = (foo.toList zip bar.toList) map ((f: Double, b : Double) => f+b) However, this feels both ugly and inefficient -- I have to convert both seqs to lists (which explodes with lazy lists), create this temporary list of tuples, only to map over it and let it be GCed. Maybe streams solve the lazy problem, but in any case, this feels like unnecessarily ugly. In lisp, the map function would map over multiple sequences. I would write (mapcar (lambda (f b) (+ f b)) foo bar) And no temporary lists would get created anywhere. Is there a map-over-multiple-lists function in Scala, or is zip combined with destructuring really the 'right' way to do this?

    Read the article

  • mapping file-* to a property

    - by andersonbd1
    Hi, I'd like to: <unjar src="lib/mst-service-impl*.zip" but I can't put an asterisk in there. It is only one file, but I don't want to hardcode the version in there. Is there a way to create a property with the asterisk (I know this particular example doesn't work, but perhaps something along these lines): <property name="my.jar" file="lib/mst-service-impl*.zip"> so that I could then do this: <unjar src="${my.jar}" Thanks, Ben

    Read the article

  • Is the Windows Start button an example of poor mapping? [migrated]

    - by user336359
    In my recent course on HCI, I've been told that start button on Windows systems is an example of poor mapping. The reason for that, as explained in materials, is that it doesn't start anything, but rather reveals a menu. I think that this is only valid if you approaching this from low level of abstraction (meaning that the button must start something). If you on the other hand take a view on this from higher level of abstraction, as of "Place where I start most of my tasks", i.e. This is the place where you are start*ing the task of switching off your computer This is the place where you are start*ing the task of searching for something on your computer This is the place where you are start*ing the task of running a program This is the place where you are start*ing the task ... Then I think it makes perfect sense and has perfect mapping. Is this a sensible interpretation?

    Read the article

  • Unit Testing a CSV Parser and Column Mapping Tool

    - by PieterG
    I am really starting to enjoy unit testing and have the following question to the gurus of unit testing. Let's for example say I have the following class public class FileMapper { public Dictionary<string, string> ReadFile(string filename, string delimeter){} } How do you guys generally go about unit testing a Parser or ReadFile method in my case?

    Read the article

  • How to create relationship mapping via Entity framework

    - by James
    I have following domain model: User { int Id; } City { int Id; } UserCity { int UserId, int CityId, dateTime StartDate } In the function where I have to attach a user to a city, the following code is working for me: UserCity uc = new UserCity(); //This is a db hit uc.User = MyEntityFrameworkDBContext.User.FirstOrDefault(u => u.ID == currentUserId); //this is a db hit uc.City = MyEntityFrameworkDBContext.City.FirstOrDefault(c => c.ID == currentCityId); uc.StartDate = userCityStartDate; //this is a db hit MyEntityFrameworkDBContext.SaveChanges(); Is there any way I can create relationships with just one single DB hit? The first two db hits are not required, actually.

    Read the article

  • Mapping individual buttons on ASP.NET MVC View to controller actions

    - by skb
    I have an application where I need the user to be able to update or delete rows of data from the database. The rows are displayed to the user using a foreach loop in the .aspx file of my view. Each row will have two text fields (txtName, txtDesc), an update button, and a delete button. What I'm not sure of, is how do I have the update button send the message to the controller for which row to update? I can see a couple way of doing this: Put each row within it's own form tag, then when the update button is clicked, it will submit the values for that row only (there will also be a hidden field with the rowId) and the controller class would take all the post values as parameters to the Update method on the controller. Somehow, have the button be scripted in a way to send back only the values for that row with a POST to the controller. Is there a way of doing this? One thing I am concerned about is if each row has different names for it's controls assigned by ASP.NET (txtName1, txtDesc1, txtName2, txtDesc2), then how will their values get mapped to the correct parameters of the Controller method?

    Read the article

  • java mapping for oracle number type

    - by aauser
    I have database with oracle number type. Could there any possible issues with using java Double when updating table with numeric column. Should i switch BigDecimal or Double is approriate type. As I fas as I know, BigDecimal is used when arbitrary precision required, when deal with prices for example. Consider simple API updatePrice(Double d) Should i persist double as is or BigDecimal.valueOf(d) is preferable ?

    Read the article

  • Query for Joining Two Tables With Possible Multiple Mapping

    - by Dharmendra Mohapatra
    First_table srno wono Actual_Start_Date Actual_End_Date 1 31 2012-06-02 2012-06-05 2 32 2012-06-05 2012-06-22 3 33 2012-06-11 2012-06-23 4 34 2012-06-23 2012-06-30 5 A-2 2012-06-24 2012-06-25 6 BU 2012-06-24 2012-06-26 7 40 2012-06-25 2012-06-27 second_table srno wono Base_start_date Base_end_date uploadhistoryid 1 31 2012-06-05 2012-06-05 1 2 32 2012-06-11 2012-06-12 2 3 32 2012-06-15 2012-06-17 3 4 32 2012-06-18 2012-06-20 4 5 33 2012-06-22 2012-06-25 5 5 33 2012-06-23 2012-06-25 5 Result Required SET ANSI_NULLS ON GO SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON GO ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[Reports_Subanalysis] ( @WONo VARCHAR(20) ) AS BEGIN SELECT 'SAT' AS stage, s.Base_start_date AS start_date, s.Base_end_date AS end_date, f.Actual_Start_Date AS Actual_Start_Date, f.Actual_end_Date AS Actual_End_Date FROM First_table f, second_table B WHERE A.wOno=B.nOno AND f.uploadhistoryid in (SELECT min(uploadhistoryid) FROM second_table C WHERE f.wono = C.wono) AND b.wono=@WONo END when I pass '32' Result stage start_date end_date Actual_Start_Date Actual_End_Date SAT 2012-06-11 2012-06-12 2012-06-05 2012-06-05 how Can I get the result like this when I pass non matching value like 'BU' stage start_date end_date Actual_Start_Date Actual_End_Date SAT NULL NULL 2012-06-24 2012-06-26 What modification do I need in my routine?

    Read the article

  • Entity Framework one-to-one relationship mapping flattened in code

    - by Josh Close
    I have a table structure like so. Address: AddressId int not null primary key identity ...more columns AddressContinental: AddressId int not null primary key identity foreign key to pk of Address County State AddressInternational: AddressId int not null primary key identity foreign key to pk of Address ProvinceRegion I don't have control over schema, this is just the way it is. Now, what I want to do is have a single Address object. public class Address { public int AddressId { get; set; } public County County { get; set; } public State State { get; set } public ProvinceRegion { get; set; } } I want to have EF pull it out of the database as a single entity. When saving, I want to save the single entity and have EF know to split it into the three tables. How would I map this in EF 4.1 Code First? I've been searching around and haven't found anything that meets my case yet. UPDATE An address record will have a record in Address and one in either AddressContinental or AddressInternational, but not both.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43  | Next Page >