Search Results

Search found 23517 results on 941 pages for 'visual basic 6'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 36/941 | < Previous Page | 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43  | Next Page >

  • Problem with Ajax Toolkit ASP.NET (Visual Basic)

    - by AZIRAR
    Hey, I'm trying to use Ajax Toolkit in ASP.NET page to display a Calendar Extender with this code, but it's not working for me. <form id="form1" runat="server"> <asp:ScriptManager ID="ScriptManager1" runat="server"> </asp:ScriptManager> <div> <br /> <br /> <b>Calendar :</b><br /> <asp:TextBox ID="Date1" runat="server"></asp:TextBox> <asp:CalendarExtender ID="CalendarExtender1" runat="server" TargetControlID="Date1"> </asp:CalendarExtender> </div> </form> It's not displaying the calendar. What's the problem ?

    Read the article

  • Sql Server Compact 2005 on Visual Studio 2008

    - by Tim
    I'm working on a Windows Forms application that interacts with a Sql Compact database file created by SQL Server 2005. This application was originally developed in Visual Studio 2005 but was recently converted to a Visual Studio 2008 solution. In regards to Sql Compact, we made sure the references were all still set to the assemblies that handle the 2005 version of Sql Compact rather than Sql Compact 3.5. Having done this, the application still runs just as it should - it will still interact with the Compact database, perform synchronization operations, etc. However, I just discovered today that Visual Studio tools such as the DataSet Designer do not play well with a Sql Compact database file of an older version than 3.5. If I go to the New Connection... wizard, the only Sql Compact Data Source / Data Provider are for Sql Compact 3.5. I assume that Visual Studio 2008 just doesn't include the data provider for the older version of Sql Compact by default. Is there a way you can add the old version of Sql Compact to the list of "Data Sources" for the connection wizard? To see exactly what I'm referring to, click on the Tools menu of Visual Studio 2008 and click Connect to Database... In the window that comes up, click Change... next to the Data source setting. From this dialog there is no way I can select the earlier version of Sql Compact - only 3.5 is available. Maybe I need to add an assembly reference somewhere? Or copy some file(s) from my Visual Studio 2005 directory over to 2008? I would think there would have to be a way for Visual Studio 2008 to be able to interact with a Sql Compact database from Sql Server 2005. To provide one more bit of detail, I discovered this problem when I went to my DataSet, right-clicked and tried to add a TableAdapter. The first screen that comes up says, "Choose Your Data Connection". If I leave it set to the Sql Compact connection that we've always used, I now get the following error when clicking the Next button: Failed to open a connection to the database "The selected database was created with an earlier version of SQL Server Compact and needs to be upgraded to SQL Server Compact 3.5 before the connection can be opened or tested. Upgrade the database by creating a new data connection and completing the Add Connection dialog box." Check the connection and try again. The only problem here is that we still use Sql Server 2005, and if my understanding is correct, it does not produce subscription files that are compatible with Sql Compact 3.5. If I am wrong in this assumption, please correct me. Any help you can provide is greatly appreciated. Thank you.

    Read the article

  • Sending commands to a console program from Visual Basic 6

    - by DomingoSL
    I have a console program on windows (a compiled version of curl command line) in where you can write commands and have a return. How can i send commands to this console application and return the result to VB6??? i know you can do this with DOS commands with Windows Script Host but as you see the commands i want to run dont are in command.exe Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Visual Basic .NET Help

    - by Daniel
    How can I get this code into a loop? contact.first_name = list.Item(0) contact.middle_name = list.Item(1) contact.last_name = list.Item(2) contact.age = list.Item(3) contact.mobile_phone = list.Item(4) contact.home_phone = list.Item(5) contact.work_phone = list.Item(6) contact.home_street = list.Item(7) contact.home_city = list.Item(8) contact.home_state = list.Item(9) contact.home_zip = list.Item(10) contact.work_street = list.Item(11) contact.work_city = list.Item(12) contact.work_state = list.Item(13) contact.work_zip = list.Item(14)

    Read the article

  • How to set which version of the VC++ runtime Visual Studio 2005 targets

    - by TallGuy
    I have an application that contains a VC++ project (along with C# projects). Previously, (i.e. during the last year or so) when a build has been done, Visual Studio 2005 appears to be targeting the VC++ runtime version 8.0.50727.762. At least, that is what the Assembly.dll.intermediate.manifest file is telling me: <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8' standalone='yes'?> <assembly xmlns='urn:schemas-microsoft-com:asm.v1' manifestVersion='1.0'> <dependency> <dependentAssembly> <assemblyIdentity type='win32' name='Microsoft.VC80.CRT' version='8.0.50727.762' processorArchitecture='x86' publicKeyToken='1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b' /> </dependentAssembly> </dependency> </assembly> This version number matches the Visual Studio 2005 version number. The application worked fine when deployed to the webserver. The sun was shining, the birds were singing and all was right with the world. Now something has changed. I don't know what - a security patch, an obscure Visual Studio setting or something. Now Visual Studio 2005 seems to be targeting the wrong version of the VC++ runtime: <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8' standalone='yes'?> <assembly xmlns='urn:schemas-microsoft-com:asm.v1' manifestVersion='1.0'> <dependency> <dependentAssembly> <assemblyIdentity type='win32' name='Microsoft.VC80.CRT' version='8.0.50727.4053' processorArchitecture='x86' publicKeyToken='1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b' /> </dependentAssembly> </dependency> </assembly> When I deploy the application to the webserver, I get the dreaded This application has failed to start because the application configuration is incorrect. Reinstalling the application may fix this problem. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x800736B1) error. This problem occurs even when I recompile previous versions of the application. I can absolutely guarantee that nothing at all has changed in the solution - we zip up the entire contents of the solution as part of the build process and archive it. I have unzipped a number of these to a temp directory, verified that the previous manifest file refers to 8.0.50727.762, recompiled using exactly the same command at the command line and then verified that the new manifest file now refers to 8.0.50727.4053. I am using Microsoft Visual Studio 2005 Version 8.0.50727.762 (SP.050727-7600) and Microsoft Visual C++ 2005 77646-008-0000007-41610. Why would Visual Studio revert to a previous version of the VC++ runtime? How do I specify which version it should use? What is going wrong here?

    Read the article

  • Visual Basic 6 ADO Update question...

    - by Dave
    Hi, I've been working with a Legacy application which interacts with a database through ADODB, and most of the changes to records follow a fairly straightforward pattern of: Create a Recordset from a query Make various change to the recordset call .Update on the recordset. What I'm wondering is, with ADODB recordsets, is there anyway to extract the 'changes'. The logic which changes the recordset is scattered about, and all I need is the changes, not how it was changed... Any suggestions for tracking changes in a recordset (in code, a trigger on the DB or similar is no use here) Thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • Apache basic auth, mod_authn_dbd and password salt

    - by Cristian Vrabie
    Using Apache mod_auth_basic and mod_authn_dbd you can authenticate a user by looking up that user's password in the database. I see that working if the password is held in clear, but what if we use a random string as a salt (also stored in the database) then store the hash of the concatenation? mod_authn_dbd requires you to specify a query to select that password not to decide if the user is authenticated of not. So you cannot use that query to concatenate the user provided password with the salt then compare with the stored hash. AuthDBDUserRealmQuery "SELECT password FROM authn WHERE user = %s AND realm = %s" Is there a way to make this work?

    Read the article

  • problem with DataReader ASP.NET (Visual Basic)

    - by ZiGi
    Hey, I have this problem : [InvalidOperationException: No data exists for the row / column.] System.Data.OleDb.OleDbDataReader.DoValueCheck(Int32 ordinal) +1029063 System.Data.OleDb.OleDbDataReader.GetInt32(Int32 ordinal) +12 ASP.addsousvoyage_aspx.hdVoyage_SelectedIndexChanged(Object sender, EventArgs e) in C:\Users\ZiGi\Desktop\VisualDesign\addSousVoyage.aspx:222 System.Web.UI.WebControls.ListControl.OnSelectedIndexChanged(EventArgs e) +111 System.Web.UI.WebControls.DropDownList.RaisePostDataChangedEvent() +134 System.Web.UI.WebControls.DropDownList.System.Web.UI.IPostBackDataHandler.RaisePostDataChangedEvent() +10 System.Web.UI.Page.RaiseChangedEvents() +165 System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint) +1485 When I do this : MsgBox(myReader1.GetInt32(0).ToString) Even if : MsgBox(myReader1.FieldCount) returning 1 as value and the field(0) is integer. What's the problem ?

    Read the article

  • php class basic question

    - by Ross
    hi <?php class myClass { var $input; var $output; function myClass($input) { $output = 'You entered: ' . $input; return $output; } } $test = new myClass; echo $test->myClass(123); ?> this works, but returns this warning: Warning: Missing argument 1 for myClass::myClass() I read in to this, and seems that the constructor is expecting a value, so by adding: function myClass($input='') the warning is removed, but this seems so unnecessary? could someone enlighten me as to why it's required to define a value to prevent that warning? thanks for any pointers

    Read the article

  • Visual Basic 2010 Language Enhancements

    Earlier this month Microsoft released Visual Studio 2010, the .NET Framework 4.0 (which includes ASP.NET 4.0), and new versions of their core programming languages: C# 4.0 and Visual Basic 10 (also referred to as Visual Basic 2010). Previously, the C# and Visual Basic programming languages were managed by two separate teams within Microsoft, which helps explain why features found in one language was not necessarily found in the other. For example, C# 3.0 introduced <a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2007/03/08/new-c-orcas-language-features-automatic-properties-object-initializers-and-collection-initializers.aspx"><i>collection initializers</i></a>, which enable developers to define the contents of a collection when declaring it; however,

    Read the article

  • Cannot exclude a path from basic auth when using a front controller script

    - by Adam Monsen
    I have a small PHP/Apache2 web application wherein I'd like to do two seemingly incompatible operations: Route all requests through a single PHP script (a "front controller", if you will) Secure everything except API calls with HTTP basic authentication I can satisfy either requirement just fine in isolation, it's when I try to do both at once that I am blocked. For no good reason I'm trying to accomplish these requirements solely with Apache configuration. Here are the requirements stated as an example. A GET request for this URL: http://basic/api/listcars?max=10 should be sent through front.php without requiring basic auth. front.php will get /api/listcars?max=10 and do whatever it needs to with that. Here's what I think should work. In my /etc/hosts I added 127.0.0.1 basic and I am using this Apache config: <Location /> AuthType Basic AuthName "Home Secure" AuthUserFile /etc/apache2/passwords require valid-user </Location> <VirtualHost *:80> ServerName basic DocumentRoot /var/www/basic <Directory /var/www/basic> <IfModule mod_rewrite.c> RewriteEngine On RewriteCond %{SCRIPT_FILENAME} !-f RewriteCond %{SCRIPT_FILENAME} !-d RewriteRule ^(.*)$ /front.php/$1 [QSA,L] </IfModule> </Directory> <Location /api> Order deny,allow Allow from all Satisfy any </Location> </VirtualHost> But I still always get a HTTP 401: Authorization Required response. I can make it work by changing <Location /api> into <Location ~ /api> but this allows more than I want to past basic auth. I also tried changing the <Directory /var/www/basic> section into <Location />, but this doesn't work either (and it results in some strange values for PATH_TRANSLATED being passed to the script). I searched around and found many examples of selective exclusion of basic auth, but none that also incorporated a front controller. I could certainly do something like handle basic auth in the front controller, but if I can have Apache do that instead I'll be able to keep all authentication logic out of my PHP code. A friend suggested splitting this into two vhosts, which I know also works. This used to be two separate vhosts, actually. I'm using Apache 2.2.22 / PHP 5.3.10 on Ubuntu 12.04.

    Read the article

  • Introducing Visual WebGui's XAML programming model extension for web developers

    - by Visual WebGui
    While ASP.NET provides an event base approach it is completely dismissed when working with AJAX and the richness of the server is lost and replaced with JavaScript programming and couple with a very high security risk. Visual WebGui reinstates the power of the server to AJAX development and provides a statefull yet scalable, server centric architecture that provides the benefits and user productivity of AJAX with the security and developer productivity we had before AJAX stormed into our lives. When...(read more)

    Read the article

  • Visual Studio 2010 and .NET Framework 4 Training Kit April 2010 Release

    - by Harish Pavithran
    The Visual Studio 2010 and .NET Framework 4 Training Kit includes presentations, hands-on labs, and demos. This content is designed to help you learn how to utilize the Visual Studio 2010 features and a variety of framework technologies including: C# 4 Visual Basic 10 F# Parallel Extensions Windows Communication Foundation Windows Workflow Windows Presentation Foundation ASP.NET 4 Windows 7 Entity Framework ADO.NET Data Services Managed Extensibility Framework Visual Studio Team System This version of the Training Kit works with Visual Studio 2010 and .NET Framework 4.  Here is the link enjoy www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx

    Read the article

  • Visual Studio Tips and Tricks

    - by deadlydog
    Just found a few websites that show some Visual Studio tips that I haven't seen before, so I thought I'd share: 1 - Tips and Tricks for the Visual Studio .NET IDE 2 - Essential Visual Studio Tips & Tricks that Every Developer Should Know 3 - Channel 9's Visual Studio Toolbox - weekly series dedicated to showing all the cool stuff that Visual Studio can do and how to be more productive with it.

    Read the article

  • Visual Studio &quot;14&quot; CTP

    - by TATWORTH
    Originally posted on: http://geekswithblogs.net/TATWORTH/archive/2014/06/04/visual-studio-quot14quot-ctp.aspxSomasegar has blogged about Visual Studio "14" CTPat http://blogs.msdn.com/b/somasegar/. At a CTP it should be installed on dedicated PC with no other  version of Visual Studio installed. There are important updates for both C# (see http://blogs.msdn.com/b/csharpfaq/archive/2014/06/03/visual-studio-14-ctp-now-available.aspx) and VB.NET (see http://blogs.msdn.com/b/vbteam/archive/2014/06/03/visual-studio-14-ctp-now-available.aspx).

    Read the article

  • Micro Focus intègre Visual COBOL à Visual Studio 2012 et lance la version 11 de Borland DevPartner, son débogueur optimisé pour l'EDI

    Micro Focus intègre Visual COBOL à Visual Studio 2012 Et lance la version 11 de Borland DevPartner optimisée pour l'EDI L'éditeur Micro Focus vient d'annoncer l'intégration de sa solution Visual Cobol au prochain EDI de Microsoft. Une nouveauté qui permet de réutiliser ou de réaffecter les applications COBOL dans d'autres langages et dans d'autres environnements de développement tels que C#, Visual Basic ou ASP.NET. Nouveauté intéressante, cette version permet le déploiement dans le Cloud et des capacités de travail collaboratif renforcées. « Visual Studio 2012 améliore le processus de développement en permettant aux équipes de travai...

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43  | Next Page >