Search Results

Search found 9137 results on 366 pages for 'worker thread'.

Page 36/366 | < Previous Page | 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43  | Next Page >

  • Start thread with two parameters

    - by Matt
    I've got a method that gets called on an event, which presents me with two variables varA, varB (both strings). This method gets called with new information quite frequently, thus I have created a separate method that takes in the two parameters. I want to run this method in a thread, however have struck the issue that Thread.Start will not accept parameters. I've tried a few supposed methods, but have so far had no luck.. I think my best bet is to create a separate class, and handle it there.. However I have a List which I am inserting data into, and hit a dead end when the separate class tried to access that list, since it was in a different class. Can someone help me out here please?

    Read the article

  • logger chain in python

    - by Zaar Hai
    I'm writing python package/module and would like the logging messages mention what module/class/function they come from. I.e. if I run this code: import mymodule.utils.worker as worker w = worker.Worker() w.run() I'd like to logging messages looks like this: 2010-06-07 15:15:29 INFO mymodule.utils.worker.Worker.run <pid/threadid>: Hello from worker How can I accomplish this? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Is autoload thread-safe in Ruby 1.9?

    - by SFEley
    It seems to me that the Ruby community has been freaking out a little about autoload since this famous thread, discouraging its use for thread safety reasons. Does anyone know if this is no longer an issue in Ruby 1.9.1 or 1.9.2? I've seen a bit of talk about wrapping requires in mutexes and such, but the 1.9 changelogs (or at least as much as I've been able to find) don't seem to address this particular question. I'd like to know if I can reasonably start autoloading in 1.9-only libraries without any reasonable grief. Thanks in advance for any insights.

    Read the article

  • How to instantly termainate an un-supervised script on demand?

    - by errr
    I have a GUI which resembles an interpreter. It allows the user to write a script in Jython (implementation of Python in Java) and run it whenever he wants. Apart from that, I also wish to allow the user to instantly terminate the run whenever he wants. Thing is, I don't really know how to do it. The script is being run on a different Thread, but I don't know of any secure way to stop/interrupt/terminate a thread in the middle of its run, let alone not knowing what is being run by the thread/script (it could be a simple task or maybe some sort of a heavy SQL query against a DB, and a DB is something which requires careful resource handling). How can I instantly terminate such run on demand?

    Read the article

  • Setting current culture with threads in ASP.NET MVC

    - by mare
    Here's an example of SetCulture attribute which inside does something like this: public void OnActionExecuting(ActionExecutingContext filterContext) { string cultureCode = SetCurrentLanguage(filterContext); if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(cultureCode)) return; HttpContext.Current.Response.Cookies.Add( new HttpCookie("Culture", cultureCode) { HttpOnly = true, Expires = DateTime.Now.AddYears(100) } ); filterContext.HttpContext.Session["Culture"] = cultureCode; CultureInfo culture = new CultureInfo(cultureCode); System.Threading.Thread.CurrentThread.CurrentCulture = culture; System.Threading.Thread.CurrentThread.CurrentUICulture = culture; } I was wondering how does this affect a site with multiple users logged on and each one setting their own culture? What is the scope of a thread here with regards to the IIS worker process (w3wp) that the site is running in?

    Read the article

  • How to make a thread try to reconnect to the Database x times using JDBCTemplate

    - by gillJ
    Hi, I have a single thread trying to connect to a database using JDBCTemplate as follows: JDBCTemplate jdbcTemplate = new JdbcTemplate(dataSource); try{ jdbcTemplate.execute(new CallableStatementCreator() { @Override public CallableStatement createCallableStatement(Connection con) throws SQLException { return con.prepareCall(query); } }, new CallableStatementCallback() { @Override public Object doInCallableStatement(CallableStatement cs) throws SQLException { cs.setString(1, subscriberID); cs.execute(); return null; } }); } catch (DataAccessException dae) { throw new CougarFrameworkException( "Problem removing subscriber from events queue: " + subscriberID, dae); } I want to make sure that if the above code throws DataAccessException or SQLException, the thread waits a few seconds and tries to re-connect, say 5 more times and then gives up. How can I achieve this? Also, if during execution the database goes down and comes up again, how can i ensure that my program recovers from this and continues running instead of throwing an exception and exiting?

    Read the article

  • Log RuntimeException thrown from thread created by Spring via the @Async annotation

    - by Eugen
    I'm having some difficulty logging RuntimeException from a thread. My system is: Java 7 (b118), Spring 3.0.5. The threads are not created by hand, but via Spring's @Async annotation, which creates it's own executor behind the scenes, so I don't really have the option of overriding any methods of the thread, FutureTask or anything low level. So my question is if Spring has any support or if there are any best practices for handling (logging) these type of exceptions? Any suggestions are appreciated. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Fire just once a Thread in Asp.net WebSite Global.asax

    - by Luís Custódio
    I've a legacy application using Asp.Net WebSite (winforms...) and I need run a background thread that collect periodically some files. But this thread must run just one time! My problem start when I put a method in Application_Start: void Application_Start(object sender, EventArgs e) { SetConnection(); SetNHibernate(); SetNinject(); SetExportThread(); } So I start my application on Visual Studio and three threads start to run. I need some singleton? or something?

    Read the article

  • Avoding multiple thread spawns in pthreads

    - by madman
    Hi StackOverflow, I have an application that is parallellized using pthreads. The application has a iterative routine call and a thread spawn within the rountine (pthread_create and pthread_join) to parallelize the computation intensive section in the routine. When I use an instrumenting tool like PIN to collect the statistics the tool reports statistics for several threads(no of threads x no of iterations). I beleive it is because it is spawning new set of threads each time the routine is called. How can I ensure that I create the thread only once and all successive calls use the threads that have been created first. When I do the same with OpenMP and then try to collect the statistics, I see that the threads are created only once. Is it beacause of the OpenMP runtime ? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Visual Studio 2008 Macro for Building does not block thread

    - by Climber104
    Hello, I am trying to write a macro for Building my application, kicking off an external tool, and ataching the debugger to that external tool. Everything is working except for the building. It builds, but it is not blocking the thread so the external tool gets kicked off before it can finish. Is there a way I can run ExecuteCommand and wait for the thread to finish? Code is below: DTE.ExecuteCommand("ClassViewContextMenus.ClassViewProject.Build") DTE.ExecuteCommand("Tools.ExternalCommand11") Try Dim dbg2 As EnvDTE80.Debugger2 = DTE.Debugger Dim trans As EnvDTE80.Transport = dbg2.Transports.Item("Default") Dim dbgeng(1) As EnvDTE80.Engine dbgeng(0) = trans.Engines.Item("Managed") Dim proc2 As EnvDTE80.Process2 = dbg2.GetProcesses(trans, "MINIPC").Item("_nStep.exe") proc2.Attach2(dbgeng) Catch ex As System.Exception MsgBox(ex.Message) End Try

    Read the article

  • Using CreateWindow() to make additional Window on a thread - C

    - by Jamie Keeling
    Hello, I have a windows form that has a simple menu and performs a simple operation, I want to be able to create another windows form with all the functionality of a menu bar, message pump etc.. as a separate thread so I can then share the results of the operation to the second window. I.E. 1) Form A opens Form B opens as a separate thread 2)Form A performs operation 3)Form A passes results via memory to Form B 4)Form B display results I'm confused as to how to go about it, the main app runs fine but i'm not sure how to add a second window if the first one already exists. I think that using CreateWindow will allow me to make another window but again i'm not sure how to access the message pump so I can respond to certain events like WM_CREATE on the second window. I hope it makes sense. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Is it okay to pass injected EntityManagers to EJB bean's helper classes and use it?

    - by Zwei steinen
    We have some JavaEE5 stateless EJB bean that passes the injected EntityManager to its helpers. Is this safe? It has worked well until now, but I found out some Oracle document that states its implementation of EntityManager is thread-safe. Now I wonder whether the reason we did not have issues until now, was only because the implementation we were using happened to be thread-safe (we use Oracle). @Stateless class SomeBean { @PersistenceContext private EntityManager em; private SomeHelper helper; @PostConstruct public void init(){ helper = new SomeHelper(em); } @Override public void business(){ helper.doSomethingWithEm(); } } Actually it makes sense.. If EntityManager is thread-unsafe, a container would have to do inercept business() this.em = newEntityManager(); business(); which will not propagate to its helper classes. If so, what is the best practice in this kind of a situation? Passing EntityManagerFactory instead of EntityManager?

    Read the article

  • How does the email header field 'thread-index' work?

    - by Tim
    I was wondering if anyone knew how the thread-index field in email headers work? Here's a simple chain of emails thread indexes that I messaged myself with. Email 1 Thread-Index: AcqvbpKt7QRrdlwaRBKmERImIT9IDg== Email 2 Thread-Index: AcqvbpjOf+21hsPgR4qZeVu9O988Eg== Email 3 Thread-Index: Acqvbp3C811djHLbQ9eTGDmyBL925w== Email 4 Thread-Index: AcqvbqMuifoc5OztR7ei1BLNqFSVvw== Email 5 Thread-Index: AcqvbqfdWWuz4UwLS7arQJX7/XeUvg== I can't seem to say with certainty how I can link these emails together. Normally, I would use the in-reply-to field or references field, but I recently found that Blackberrys do NOT include these fields. The only include Thread-Index field.

    Read the article

  • How to implement thread timeout in J2ME?

    - by lilo
    I am using Connector in J2ME and found that sometimes it take a very long time to send a request, and sometime it may halt the whole process. So I try to put code related to Connector in a thread and try to set timeout to the thread. But I found out that it's very difficult to do this in J2ME because there's no join(long) in J2ME. Is there any way to do this? Or any better way to deal with network connection in J2ME? Thanks a lot in advance.

    Read the article

  • Android Multithreading, creating new thread not executing rest of OnCreate

    - by Aidan
    Hi Guys, Basically I'm trying to run 2 threads within the same class at the same time. The code runs but only executes whats in run() and doesnt finish the onCreate method... anyone know why? public Camera1(){ t = new Thread(this, "My Thread"); t.start(); } public void run(){ bearing(); } @Override public void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) { super.onCreate(savedInstanceState); new Camera1(); makeview(); tracking(); } Thanks!

    Read the article

  • WCF MSMQ consumer thread count

    - by Andy White
    What's the best way to configure the maximum number of threads that can pull messages from an MSMQ queue, using a netMsmqBinding in WCF? For example, say I have an MSMQ service for which I only want to have 2 (or 10, or whatever number of) worker threads pulling messages off at a time.

    Read the article

  • Creating additional Window by a thread - C

    - by Jamie Keeling
    Hello, I have a windows form that has a simple menu and performs a simple operation, I want to be able to create another windows form with all the functionality of a menu bar, message pump etc.. as a separate thread so I can then share the results of the operation to the second window. I.E. 1) Form A opens Form B opens as a separate thread 2)Form A performs operation 3)Form A passes results via memory to Form B 4)Form B display results I'm confused as to how to go about it, the main app runs fine but i'm not sure how to add a second window if the first one already exists. I hope it makes sense. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • how to use Thread in java ?

    - by tiendv
    Hi all i have code use googleseach API I want to use Thread to improve speed of my program. But i have a problem here is code import java.io.BufferedReader; import java.io.DataInputStream; import java.io.DataOutputStream; import java.io.InputStreamReader; import java.net.URL; import java.net.URLConnection; import java.net.URLEncoder; import java.util.ArrayList; import java.util.Enumeration; import java.util.Hashtable; import java.util.List; import org.json.JSONArray; import org.json.JSONObject; import com.yahoo.search.WebSearchResult; /** * Simple Search using Google ajax Web Services * * @author Daniel Jones Copyright 2006 Daniel Jones Licensed under BSD open * source license http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php */ public class GoogleSearchEngine extends Thread { private String queryString; private int maxResult; private ArrayList<String> resultGoogleArrayList = null; public ArrayList<String> getResultGoogleArrayList() { return resultGoogleArrayList; } public void setResultGoogleArrayList(ArrayList<String> resultGoogleArrayList) { this.resultGoogleArrayList = resultGoogleArrayList; } public String getQueryString() { return queryString; } public void setQueryString(String queryString) { this.queryString = queryString; } public int getMaxResult() { return maxResult; } public void setMaxResult(int maxResult) { this.maxResult = maxResult; } // Put your website here public final static String HTTP_REFERER = "http://www.example.com/"; public static ArrayList<String> makeQuery(String query, int maxResult) { ArrayList<String> finalArray = new ArrayList<String>(); ArrayList<String> returnArray = new ArrayList<String>(); try { query = URLEncoder.encode(query, "UTF-8"); int i = 0; String line = ""; StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder(); while (true) { // Call GoogleAjaxAPI to submit the query URL url = new URL("http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/services/search/web?start=" + i + "&rsz=large&v=1.0&q=" + query); URLConnection connection = url.openConnection(); if (connection == null) { break; } // Value i to stop while or Max result if (i >= maxResult) { break; } connection.addRequestProperty("Referer", HTTP_REFERER); BufferedReader reader = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(connection.getInputStream(),"utf-8")); while ((line = reader.readLine()) != null) { builder.append(line); } String response = builder.toString(); JSONObject json = new JSONObject(response); JSONArray ja = json.getJSONObject("responseData").getJSONArray("results"); for (int j = 0; j < ja.length(); j++) { try { JSONObject k = ja.getJSONObject(j); // Break string into 2 parts: URL and Title by <br> returnArray.add(k.getString("url") + "<br>" + k.getString("titleNoFormatting")); } catch (Exception e) { e.printStackTrace(); } } i += 8; } // Remove objects that is over the max number result required if (returnArray.size() > maxResult) { for (int k=0; k<maxResult; k++){ finalArray.add(returnArray.get(k)); } } else return returnArray; return finalArray; } catch (Exception e) { e.printStackTrace(); } return null; } @Override public void run() { // TODO Auto-generated method stub //super.run(); this.resultGoogleArrayList = GoogleSearchEngine.makeQuery(queryString, maxResult); System.out.println("Code run here "); } public static void main(String[] args) { Thread test = new GoogleSearchEngine(); ((GoogleSearchEngine) test).setQueryString("data "); ((GoogleSearchEngine) test).setMaxResult(10); test.start(); ArrayList<String> returnGoogleArrayList = null; returnGoogleArrayList = ((GoogleSearchEngine) test).getResultGoogleArrayList(); System.out.print("contents of al:" + returnGoogleArrayList); } } when i run it, it can run into run method but it don't excute make query methor and return null array. when i do't use Thread it can nomal . Can you give me the reason why ? or give a sulution Thanks

    Read the article

  • NSOperationqueue i want to block main thread

    - by alexeyndru
    i want to block the main thread until something else is done in the background. i used: result=[self performSelectorInBackground:@selector(calculate:) withObject:expression]; just bellow this line I am using result: [self use:result]; i dont want to use result until it is available. to achieve this I implemented calculate: { [[(AppDelegate *)[[UIApplication sharedApplication] delegate] queue] waitUntilAllOperationsAreFinished]; calculating result... } and still, the result is used before it is calculated. so, i didnt block the main thread. pls help me do that. thanks

    Read the article

  • In .NET, what thread will Events be handled in?

    - by Ben
    I have attempted to implement a producer/consumer pattern in c#. I have a consumer thread that monitors a shared queue, and a producer thread that places items onto the shared queue. The producer thread is subscribed to receive data...that is, it has an event handler, and just sits around and waits for an OnData event to fire (the data is being sent from a 3rd party api). When it gets the data, it sticks it on the queue so the consumer can handle it. When the OnData event does fire in the producer, I had expected it to be handled by my producer thread. But that doesn't seem to be what is happening. The OnData event seems as if it's being handled on a new thread instead! Is this how .net always works...events are handled on their own thread? Can I control what thread will handle events when they're raised? What if hundreds of events are raised near-simultaneously...would each have its own thread?

    Read the article

  • How to wait for thread to finish with .NET?

    - by Maxim Z.
    I've never really used threading before in C# where I need to have two threads, as well as the main UI thread. Basically, I have the following. public void StartTheActions() { //Starting thread 1.... Thread t1 = new Thread(new ThreadStart(action1)); t1.Start(); //Now, I want for the main thread (which is calling StartTheActions() ) to wait for t1 to finish (I have created an event in action1() for this) and then start t2... //HOW DO I DO THIS? Thread t2 = new Thread(new ThreadStart(action2)); t2.Start(); } So, essentially, my question is how to have a thread wait for another one to finish. What is the best way to do this? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • How to fire off a asych thread in a web application, and gaurantee only 1 thread fires?

    - by Blankman
    I want to cache a object in memory. Regenerating the object when the cache expires is fairly expensive, so I want to do the following: When the cache is "about" to expire, I want to fire off a asychronous thread that will go and rebuild the object and then reset the cache. One thing I am worry about is multiple threads firing to fetch the object to cache, I only want a single thread doing this, realizing many people will be hitting the website. This might not be the best use case to do this, but I want to know how to do this sort of thing.

    Read the article

  • Catch unhandled exception of invisible thread

    - by user346804
    In my C++ application i use an activeX component that runs its own thread (or several I don't know). Sometimes this components throws exceptions. I would like to catch these exceptions and do recovery instead of my entire application crashing. But since I don't have access to its source code or thread I am unsure how it would be done. The only solution I can think of is to run it in its own process. Using something like CreateProcess and then CreateRemoteThread, unsure how it could be implemented. Any suggestion on how to go about solving this?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43  | Next Page >