Search Results

Search found 2457 results on 99 pages for 'implicit cast'.

Page 37/99 | < Previous Page | 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44  | Next Page >

  • how floating point numbers work in C

    - by hatorade
    Let's say I have this: float i = 1.5 in binary, this float is represented as: 0 01111111 10000000000000000000000 I broke up the binary to represent the 'signed', 'exponent' and 'fraction' chunks. What I don't understand is how this represents 1.5. The exponent is 0 once you subtract the bias (127 - 127), and the fraction part with the implicit leading one is 1.1. How does 1.1 scaled by nothing = 1.5???

    Read the article

  • Tools to convert option strict off code into option strict on?

    - by deerchao
    I have to take over a project written in vb.net, which more than 400k lines of code written in option strict off mode. I want to build it under option strict on first before I do anything else -- which maybe converting it into C#. I found there's thousands of lines of code raises compilation error, mostly are about implicit type casts. Is there any tool would help to make it compile under option strict on mode if I don't want to correct every single line manually?

    Read the article

  • Built-in precedence for Expression Trees?

    - by jdk
    I'm unable to find the .NET FCL built-in concept of precedence to leverage while constructing Expression Trees. Ref System.Linq.Expressions Namespace. Is this something that must be handled manually in code, or is it somehow implicit and I'm not recognizing it, maybe through helper methods or classes? I want to apply it to math operations to ensure 3 + 5 * 10 results in 53 instead of 80.

    Read the article

  • Is it possible in .NET 3.5 to specify an enum type?

    - by RoboShop
    I have a enumerator which map to a bunch of int example enum MyEnum { Open = 1, Closed = 2, Exit = 4 } I find though that when I want to assign this to an integer, I have to cast it first. int myEnumNumber = **(int)** MyEnum.Open; Is it possible to specify the type of an enum so that it is implicit that there is a integer assigned to any value within the enum? That way, I do not need to keep casting it to an int if I want to use it thanks

    Read the article

  • C++ adding friend to a template class in order to typecast

    - by user1835359
    I'm currently reading "Effective C++" and there is a chapter that contains code similiar to this: template <typename T> class Num { public: Num(int n) { ... } }; template <typename T> Num<T> operator*(const Num<T>& lhs, const Num<T>& rhs) { ... } Num<int> n = 5 * Num<int>(10); The book says that this won't work (and indeed it doesn't) because you can't expect the compiler to use implicit typecasting to specialize a template. As a soluting it is suggested to use the "friend" syntax to define the function inside the class. //It works template <typename T> class Num { public: Num(int n) { ... } friend Num operator*(const Num& lhs, const Num& rhs) { ... } }; Num<int> n = 5 * Num<int>(10); And the book suggests to use this friend-declaration thing whenever I need implicit conversion to a template class type. And it all seems to make sense. But why can't I get the same example working with a common function, not an operator? template <typename T> class Num { public: Num(int n) { ... } friend void doFoo(const Num& lhs) { ... } }; doFoo(5); This time the compiler complaints that he can't find any 'doFoo' at all. And if i declare the doFoo outside the class, i get the reasonable mismatched types error. Seems like the "friend ..." part is just being ignored. So is there a problem with my understanding? What is the difference between a function and an operator in this case?

    Read the article

  • What is this conversion called?

    - by LoudNPossiblyRight
    Is there a name or a term for this type of conversion in the c++ community? Has anyone seen this conversion be referred to as "implicit conversion"? class ALPHA{}; class BETA{ public: operator ALPHA(){return alpha;} private: ALPHA alpha; }; void func(ALPHA alpha){} int main(){ BETA beta; func(beta); return 0; }

    Read the article

  • Can one create Sized Types in Scala?

    - by Jens Schauder
    Is it possible to create types like e.g. String(20) in scala? The aim would be to have compiler checks for things like: a: String(20) b: String(30) a = b; // throws a compiler exception when no implicit conversion is available b= a; // works just fine Note: It doesn't need to be/named String

    Read the article

  • Exporting DLL C++ Class , question about .def file

    - by Vhaerun
    I want to use implicit linking in my project , and nmake really wants a .def file . The problem is , that this is a class , and I don't know what to write in the exports section . Could anyone point me in the right direction ? The error message is the following : NMAKE : U1073: don't know how to make 'DLLCLASS.def' P.S: I'm trying to build using Windows CE Platform Builder .

    Read the article

  • C++ superclass constructor calling rules

    - by levik
    What are the C++ rules for calling the superclass constructor from a subclass one?? For example I know in Java, you must do it as the first line of the subclass constructor (and if you don't an implicit call to a no-arg super constructor is assumed - giving you a compile error if that's missing).

    Read the article

  • How can c let a function declaration with any parameter type ?

    - by kamil çakir
    I forgot to write void parameter but it works the i put void it gives error it lets this: print(int size,int table[size][size]){ int i,j; printf("-------TABLE-------\n"); for(i = 0;i it says"previos implicit declaration was here " (means the call in main) void print(int size,int table[size][size]){ int i,j; printf("-------TABLE-------\n"); for(i = 0;i

    Read the article

  • How can c let a function declaration with any parameter type ?

    - by kamil çakir
    it lets this function declaration print(int size,int table[size][size]){ int i,j; printf("-------TABLE-------\n"); for(i = 0;i gives error in this situation 44 C:\Users.. previous implicit declaration of 'print' was here (print(size,table); call in main) void print(int size,int table[size][size]){ int i,j; printf("-------TABLE-------\n"); for(i = 0;i

    Read the article

  • I have a feeling that adding fields marked with @Transient annotation to entity is very bug-prone. A

    - by Roman
    I have some philosophical feeling that adding to an entity fields which doesn't mapped to the DB is a wrong way of solving problems. But are there any concrete situations where using @Transient fields leads to implicit and hard fixing problems? For example, is it possible that adding/removing 2nd level cache will break our app when there are @Transient fields in our entities?

    Read the article

  • Listing an application's activity and intent-filters?

    - by MBonig
    I am interested in activating another application's activity. I know from reading the Android SDK that it's probably better to do this with an implicit intent. However, this activity doesn't reside in an application I own, so I don't know the action and category and data flags on the intent-filter. How can I examine an Android applications metadata like the activity classes and the intent-filters for those activities (if declared in the manifest)? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Is scala's cake pattern possible with parametrized components?

    - by Nicolas
    Parametrized components work well with the cake pattern as long as you are only interested in a unique component for each typed component's, example: trait AComponent[T] { val a:A[T] class A[T](implicit mf:Manifest[T]) { println(mf) } } class App extends AComponent[Int] { val a = new A[Int]() } new App Now my application requires me to inject an A[Int] and an A[String], obviously scala's type system doesn't allow me to extends AComponent twice. What is the common practice in this situation ?

    Read the article

  • Working with wchar in C

    - by Richard Mar.
    I have this code: #include <stdio.h> #include <wchar.h> int main() { wchar_t *foo = L"ðh"; wprintf(L"[%ls]\n", foo); return 0; } And when I compile it, it gives me the implicit declaration of function ‘wprintf’ warning. I know that I should link the wchar library during compilation, but how do I do that?

    Read the article

  • Why does this anonymous function starting with println result in a NullPointerException?

    - by noahz
    I am learning about pmap and wrote the following function: (pmap #((println "hello from " (-> (Thread/currentThread) .getName)) (+ %1 %2)) [1 1 1] [-1 -1 -1]) When run, the result is a NullPointerException (hello from clojure-agent-send-off-pool-4 hello from clojure-agent-send-off-pool-3 hello from clojure-agent-send-off-pool-5 NullPointerException user/eval55/fn--56 (NO_SOURCE_FILE:11) Why is this happening? I have understood and observed the body of a fn to be an implicit do.

    Read the article

  • malloc in kernel

    - by yoavstr
    when i try to malloc at kernel mod i get screamed by the compiler : res=(ListNode*)malloc(sizeof(ListNode)); and the compiler is screaming : /root/ex3/ex3mod.c:491: error: implicit declaration of function ‘malloc’ what should i do ?

    Read the article

  • generating random enums

    - by null_radix
    How do I randomly select a value for an enum type in C++? I would like to do something like this. enum my_type(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,h,J,V); my_type test(rand() % 10); But this is illegal... there is not an implicit conversion from int to an enum type.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44  | Next Page >