Search Results

Search found 10131 results on 406 pages for 'natural sort'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 37/406 | < Previous Page | 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44  | Next Page >

  • Microsoft sort en open source NPM.NET, une bibliothèque qui facilite la gestion des modules Node.js dans une application

    Microsoft sort en open source NPM.NET une bibliothèque qui facilite la gestion des modules Node.js dans une application Bonne nouvelle pour les développeurs Node.js qui éprouvent des difficultés pour gérer les différents modules qui sont utilisés dans leurs applications reposant sur la librairie serveur JavaScript. Microsoft vient de publier en open source NPM.NET, une bibliothèque .NET pour le gestionnaire de modules Node.js (NPM). NPM.NET a été développé à la base pour être utilisé dans une extension pour WebMatrix 2, l'environnement de développement Web gratuit de Microsoft tout-en-un. La bibliothèque permet à l'EDI de disposer d'une interface graphique sous fo...

    Read the article

  • Amazon sort le SDK AWS pour PHP 2, une version récrite entièrement à partir de PHP 5.3 pour optimiser l'accès à ses services Cloud

    Amazon sort le SDK AWS pour PHP 2 une version entièrement récrite à partir de PHP 5.3 pour optimiser l'accès à ses services Cloud Amazon vient de publier la nouvelle version du SDK AWS (Amazon Web Service) pour PHP. Le SDK AWS pour PHP permet aux développeurs utilisant le langage de créer des applications pouvant exploiter les services de la plateforme Cloud dont DynamoDB, Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3), Amazon Glacier et Amazon CloudFront. Le nouveau SDK AWS a été entièrement reconstruit à partir de zéro, pour tirer pleinement parti de PHP 5.3 et prendre en compte les recommandations de PHP Framework Interop Group's.

    Read the article

  • La mise à jour Java 7u10 sort, Oracle ajoute des options pour bloquer ou appliquer des restrictions aux applications Web

    La mise à jour Java 7u10 sort Oracle ajoute des options pour bloquer ou appliquer des restrictions aux applications Web Java a été ces derniers mois pointé du doigt à plusieurs reprises par des experts en sécurité pour ses failles. Ces vulnérabilités de la plateforme de développement pouvaient être exploitées via des programmes s'exécutant dans les navigateurs. La mise à jour Java 7 Update 10 (Java 7u10), bien que n'apportant pas des correctifs de sécurité, dispose des fonctionnalités assez intéressantes qui permettront de réduire les risques d'attaques via des navigateurs, en ayant un meilleur contrôle sur le contenu Web. L'outil permet désormais de désactiver n'imp...

    Read the article

  • Oracle sort Java Embedded Suite 7.0 et Java ME Embedded 3.2, ses solutions dédiées aux dispositifs embarqués

    Oracle sort Java Embedded Suite 7.0 et Java ME Embedded 3.2 ses solutions dédiées aux dispositifs embarqués Oracle vient d'annoncer la publication d'Oracle Java Embedded Suite 7.0 et Oracle Java ME Embedded 3.2, ses outils pour le domaine de l'embarqué. Oracle Java Embedded Suite est une plateforme de développement qui facilite la création des applications pouvant s'exécuter à travers une large gamme de systèmes embarqués, y compris les équipements réseau, les imprimantes multifonctions, les appareils médicaux, etc. Cette nouvelle version de l'outil intègre par défaut des services Web, une base de données, un Framework d'application, tous optimisés pour les dispositifs embarqués. ...

    Read the article

  • Oracle sort Solaris 11.1 et Solaris Cluster 4.1, l'OS Unix apporte plus de 300 nouvelles fonctionnalités et étend ses capacités Cloud

    Oracle Solaris 11.1 étend ses capacités Cloud le système d'exploitation Unix sort avec plus de 300 nouvelles fonctionnalités Oracle vient de présenter Solaris 11.1, la nouvelle mise à jour majeure de son système d'exploitation Unix. Cette mouture apporte plus de 300 nouvelles fonctionnalités et améliorations à la famille des produits Oracle Solaris 11. Oracle Solaris 11 est un système d'exploitation particulièrement optimisé pour la ligne des serveurs Oracle SPARC T-Series, Oracle SPARC SuperCluster T4-4, les machines Oracle Exadata Database et la solution de Cloud Oracle Exalogic Elastic Cloud engineered systems. Oracle Solaris 11 mise essentiellement sur le Cloud ...

    Read the article

  • Linux 3.7 sort en version stable : support de multiples plateformes ARM, améliorations de Btrfs, Ext4, TCP Fast Open et IPv6

    Linux 3.7 sort en version stable support de multiples plateformes ARM, améliorations de Btrfs, Ext4, TCP Fast Open et IPv6 Près de deux mois après la sortie du noyau Linux 3.6, Linus Torvalds, annonce la publication de la version stable de Linux 3.7, avec un nombre important de nouvelles fonctionnalités. La nouveauté vedette de cette mouture est sans aucun doute la proposition d'une version unique du Kernel capable de prendre en charge plusieurs architectures ARM. Bien que le support de toutes les plateformes ARM du marché ne soit pas complet, Linux 3.7 est compatible avec les plateformes populaires comme les processeurs Calxeda's Higbank ARM utilisés dans les serveurs Moo...

    Read the article

  • Amazon sort le SDK AWS pour Node.js, un kit de développement open source qui facilite l'accès à ses solutions Cloud

    Amazon sort AWS SDK pour Node.js un kit de développement open source qui facilite l'accès à ses solutions Cloud aux développeurs Node.js Voila une nouvelle qui va certainement ravir les développeurs JavaScript utilisant Node.js. La team AWS (Amazon Web Services) Developer Tools vient de publier un kit de développement qui permettra aux développeurs Node.js d'accéder facilement à sa plateforme de Cloud Computing. Ce nouveau SDK permettra d'exploiter avec souplesse les fonctionnalités des solutions d'Amazon Web Services, notamment la plateforme de stockage Cloud Amazon S3 (Simple Storage Service), Amazon EC2 (Elastic Compute Cloud), ainsi qu'Amazon DynamoDB. Le SDK est...

    Read the article

  • Windows 8 : Google sort son application de recherche pour contrer Bing et prépare le terrain à ses services concurrents de Microsoft

    Windows 8 : Google sort son application de recherche Pour contrer Bing et préparer le terrain pour ses services concurrents de Microsoft La recherche par défaut de Windows 8 est bien évidemment Bing. On ne sait pas si la justice décidera de s'attaquer à cette application, comme elle l'a fait pour Internet Explorer ou le Media Player, mais on sait une chose : Google a déjà réagi. Et de la meilleure manière qui soit : pas devant les tribunaux donc, mais avec une application maison. Tout comme pour la version iOS, Google Search for Windows 8 est gratuit, propose la recherche vocale et tous les raccourcis vers les services hébergés de Google. Dont Gmail, Calendar , Maps ...

    Read the article

  • Microsoft sort la CTP du Service Pack 1 de SQL Server 2012 : support amélioré pour AlwaysOn, XML et SharePoint Server 2013

    Microsoft sort la CTP du Service Pack 1 de SQL Server 2012 : support amélioré pour AlwaysOn, XML et SharePoint Server 2013 Microsoft vient de publier la CTP4 (Customer Technology Preview) du Service Pack 1 de SQL Server 2012. SQL Server 2012 est la dernière version majeure de la plateforme de gestion et d'analyse d'information de Microsoft. Publiée en version stable en avril dernier, cette mouture offre un meilleur support pour les applications critiques d'entreprise, fournit des solutions de business intelligence complètes et permet aux applications de communiquer de façon transparente avec les plateformes de Cloud. Le SP 1 de SQL Server 2012 apporte quelques nouveautés e...

    Read the article

  • Oracle Solaris 11.1 étend ses capacités Cloud, le système d'exploitation Unix sort avec plus de 300 nouvelles fonctionnalités

    Oracle Solaris 11.1 étend ses capacités Cloud le système d'exploitation Unix sort avec plus de 300 nouvelles fonctionnalités Oracle vient d'annoncer la sortie de Solaris 11.1, la nouvelle mise à jour majeure de son système d'exploitation Unix. Cette mouture apporte plus de 300 nouvelles fonctionnalités et améliorations à la famille des produits Oracle Solaris 11. Oracle Solaris 11 est un système d'exploitation particulièrement optimisé pour la ligne des serveurs Oracle SPARC T-Series, Oracle SPARC SuperCluster T4-4, les machines Oracle Exadata Database et la solution de Cloud Oracle Exalogic Elastic Cloud engineered systems. Oracle Solaris 11 mise essentiellement su...

    Read the article

  • Mozilla sort en urgence Firefox 16.0.1, pour corriger une faille critique ayant entraîné la suspension des téléchargements du navigateur

    Firefox s'offre une ligne de commande le Developer Toolbar permet d'interagir avec une page, la bêta de la version 16 sort Ce sont les vacances pour certains, mais pas pour la fondation Mozilla qui reste fidèle à son cycle de développement rapide de Firefox. À peine la version 15 du navigateur disponible, son successeur pointe déjà le bout de son nez. Mozilla vient de faire passer Firefox 16 du Canal Aurora au Canal bêta, et vante déjà la nouveauté phare qui sera disponible au sein du navigateur. Firefox 16 dispose d'une nouvelle ligne de commande, permettant aux développeurs d'interagir de façon ...

    Read the article

  • How can I sort a document according to a substring in each line on Win7?

    - by Joey Hammer
    How can I sort a text according to hashtag on Windows-7? I have a long text (.txt format) which looks something like this: Blah blah #Test 123123 #Really Blah bluh #Really klfdmngl #Test I would like to conveniently, quickly and automatically be able to sort the text so that it looks like this: Blah blah #Test klfdmngl #Test 123123 #Really Blah bluh #Really I have to do this on a daily basis so I would like to be able to do it in as few steps as possible.

    Read the article

  • How to sort folders by last characters of folder name in Windows 7?

    - by nigelc
    I have a stack of client folders with names like this: eastcoal 008 mee 022 orr 047 owaka 032 owen 025 powernet006 redpath 031 Normally this works, but sometimes I'd like to sort by the number. So how can I sort folders by the last characters in the folder string? Characters will always be three consecutive numbers, and will run from 001 to 999 (until I've done a thousand jobs, which will take years).

    Read the article

  • Given a vector of maximum 10 000 natural and distinct numbers, find 4 numbers(a, b, c, d) such that

    - by king_kong
    Hi, I solved this problem by following a straightforward but not optimal algorithm. I sorted the vector in descending order and after that substracted numbers from max to min to see if I get a + b + c = d. Notice that I haven't used anywhere the fact that elements are natural, distinct and 10 000 at most. I suppose these details are the key. Does anyone here have a hint over an optimal way of solving this? Thank you in advance! Later Edit: My idea goes like this: '<<quicksort in descending order>>' for i:=0 to count { // after sorting, loop through the array int d := v[i]; for j:=i+1 to count { int dif1 := d - v[j]; int a := v[j]; for k:=j+1 to count { if (v[k] > dif1) continue; int dif2 := dif1 - v[k]; b := v[k]; for l:=k+1 to count { if (dif2 = v[l]) { c := dif2; return {a, b, c, d} } } } } } What do you think?(sorry for the bad indentation)

    Read the article

  • Mulitple full joins in Postgres is slow

    - by blast83
    I have a program to use the IMDB database and am having very slow performance on my query. It appears that it doesn't use my where condition until after it materializes everything. I looked around for hints to use but nothing seems to work. Here is my query: SELECT * FROM name as n1 FULL JOIN aka_name ON n1.id = aka_name.person_id FULL JOIN cast_info as t2 ON n1.id = t2.person_id FULL JOIN person_info as t3 ON n1.id = t3.person_id FULL JOIN char_name as t4 ON t2.person_role_id = t4.id FULL JOIN role_type as t5 ON t2.role_id = t5.id FULL JOIN title as t6 ON t2.movie_id = t6.id FULL JOIN aka_title as t7 ON t6.id = t7.movie_id FULL JOIN complete_cast as t8 ON t6.id = t8.movie_id FULL JOIN kind_type as t9 ON t6.kind_id = t9.id FULL JOIN movie_companies as t10 ON t6.id = t10.movie_id FULL JOIN movie_info as t11 ON t6.id = t11.movie_id FULL JOIN movie_info_idx as t19 ON t6.id = t19.movie_id FULL JOIN movie_keyword as t12 ON t6.id = t12.movie_id FULL JOIN movie_link as t13 ON t6.id = t13.linked_movie_id FULL JOIN link_type as t14 ON t13.link_type_id = t14.id FULL JOIN keyword as t15 ON t12.keyword_id = t15.id FULL JOIN company_name as t16 ON t10.company_id = t16.id FULL JOIN company_type as t17 ON t10.company_type_id = t17.id FULL JOIN comp_cast_type as t18 ON t8.status_id = t18.id WHERE n1.id = 2003 Very table is related to each other on the join via foreign-key constraints and have indexes for all the mentioned columns. The query plan details: "Hash Left Join (cost=5838187.01..13756845.07 rows=15579622 width=835) (actual time=146879.213..146891.861 rows=20 loops=1)" " Hash Cond: (t8.status_id = t18.id)" " -> Hash Left Join (cost=5838185.92..13542624.18 rows=15579622 width=822) (actual time=146879.199..146891.833 rows=20 loops=1)" " Hash Cond: (t10.company_type_id = t17.id)" " -> Hash Left Join (cost=5838184.83..13328403.29 rows=15579622 width=797) (actual time=146879.165..146891.781 rows=20 loops=1)" " Hash Cond: (t10.company_id = t16.id)" " -> Hash Left Join (cost=5828372.95..10061752.03 rows=15579622 width=755) (actual time=146426.483..146429.756 rows=20 loops=1)" " Hash Cond: (t12.keyword_id = t15.id)" " -> Hash Left Join (cost=5825164.23..6914088.45 rows=15579622 width=731) (actual time=146372.411..146372.529 rows=20 loops=1)" " Hash Cond: (t13.link_type_id = t14.id)" " -> Merge Left Join (cost=5825162.82..6699867.24 rows=15579622 width=715) (actual time=146372.366..146372.472 rows=20 loops=1)" " Merge Cond: (t6.id = t13.linked_movie_id)" " -> Merge Left Join (cost=5684009.29..6378956.77 rows=15579622 width=699) (actual time=144019.620..144019.711 rows=20 loops=1)" " Merge Cond: (t6.id = t12.movie_id)" " -> Merge Left Join (cost=5182403.90..5622400.75 rows=8502523 width=687) (actual time=136849.731..136849.809 rows=20 loops=1)" " Merge Cond: (t6.id = t19.movie_id)" " -> Merge Left Join (cost=4974472.00..5315778.48 rows=8502523 width=637) (actual time=134972.032..134972.099 rows=20 loops=1)" " Merge Cond: (t6.id = t11.movie_id)" " -> Merge Left Join (cost=1830064.81..2033131.89 rows=1341632 width=561) (actual time=63784.035..63784.062 rows=2 loops=1)" " Merge Cond: (t6.id = t10.movie_id)" " -> Nested Loop Left Join (cost=1417360.29..1594294.02 rows=1044480 width=521) (actual time=59279.246..59279.264 rows=1 loops=1)" " Join Filter: (t6.kind_id = t9.id)" " -> Merge Left Join (cost=1417359.22..1429787.34 rows=1044480 width=507) (actual time=59279.222..59279.224 rows=1 loops=1)" " Merge Cond: (t6.id = t8.movie_id)" " -> Merge Left Join (cost=1405731.84..1414378.65 rows=1044480 width=491) (actual time=59121.773..59121.775 rows=1 loops=1)" " Merge Cond: (t6.id = t7.movie_id)" " -> Sort (cost=1346206.04..1348817.24 rows=1044480 width=416) (actual time=58095.230..58095.231 rows=1 loops=1)" " Sort Key: t6.id" " Sort Method: quicksort Memory: 17kB" " -> Hash Left Join (cost=172406.29..456387.53 rows=1044480 width=416) (actual time=57969.371..58095.208 rows=1 loops=1)" " Hash Cond: (t2.movie_id = t6.id)" " -> Hash Left Join (cost=104700.38..256885.82 rows=1044480 width=358) (actual time=49981.493..50006.303 rows=1 loops=1)" " Hash Cond: (t2.role_id = t5.id)" " -> Hash Left Join (cost=104699.11..242522.95 rows=1044480 width=343) (actual time=49981.441..50006.250 rows=1 loops=1)" " Hash Cond: (t2.person_role_id = t4.id)" " -> Hash Left Join (cost=464.96..12283.95 rows=1044480 width=269) (actual time=0.071..0.087 rows=1 loops=1)" " Hash Cond: (n1.id = t3.person_id)" " -> Nested Loop Left Join (cost=0.00..49.39 rows=7680 width=160) (actual time=0.051..0.066 rows=1 loops=1)" " -> Nested Loop Left Join (cost=0.00..17.04 rows=3 width=119) (actual time=0.038..0.041 rows=1 loops=1)" " -> Index Scan using name_pkey on name n1 (cost=0.00..8.68 rows=1 width=39) (actual time=0.022..0.024 rows=1 loops=1)" " Index Cond: (id = 2003)" " -> Index Scan using aka_name_idx_person on aka_name (cost=0.00..8.34 rows=1 width=80) (actual time=0.010..0.010 rows=0 loops=1)" " Index Cond: ((aka_name.person_id = 2003) AND (n1.id = aka_name.person_id))" " -> Index Scan using cast_info_idx_pid on cast_info t2 (cost=0.00..10.77 rows=1 width=41) (actual time=0.011..0.020 rows=1 loops=1)" " Index Cond: ((t2.person_id = 2003) AND (n1.id = t2.person_id))" " -> Hash (cost=463.26..463.26 rows=136 width=109) (actual time=0.010..0.010 rows=0 loops=1)" " -> Index Scan using person_info_idx_pid on person_info t3 (cost=0.00..463.26 rows=136 width=109) (actual time=0.009..0.009 rows=0 loops=1)" " Index Cond: (person_id = 2003)" " -> Hash (cost=42697.62..42697.62 rows=2442362 width=74) (actual time=49305.872..49305.872 rows=2442362 loops=1)" " -> Seq Scan on char_name t4 (cost=0.00..42697.62 rows=2442362 width=74) (actual time=14.066..22775.087 rows=2442362 loops=1)" " -> Hash (cost=1.12..1.12 rows=12 width=15) (actual time=0.024..0.024 rows=12 loops=1)" " -> Seq Scan on role_type t5 (cost=0.00..1.12 rows=12 width=15) (actual time=0.012..0.014 rows=12 loops=1)" " -> Hash (cost=31134.07..31134.07 rows=1573507 width=58) (actual time=7841.225..7841.225 rows=1573507 loops=1)" " -> Seq Scan on title t6 (cost=0.00..31134.07 rows=1573507 width=58) (actual time=21.507..2799.443 rows=1573507 loops=1)" " -> Materialize (cost=59525.80..63203.88 rows=294246 width=75) (actual time=812.376..984.958 rows=192075 loops=1)" " -> Sort (cost=59525.80..60261.42 rows=294246 width=75) (actual time=812.363..922.452 rows=192075 loops=1)" " Sort Key: t7.movie_id" " Sort Method: external merge Disk: 24880kB" " -> Seq Scan on aka_title t7 (cost=0.00..6646.46 rows=294246 width=75) (actual time=24.652..164.822 rows=294246 loops=1)" " -> Materialize (cost=11627.38..12884.43 rows=100564 width=16) (actual time=123.819..149.086 rows=41907 loops=1)" " -> Sort (cost=11627.38..11878.79 rows=100564 width=16) (actual time=123.807..138.530 rows=41907 loops=1)" " Sort Key: t8.movie_id" " Sort Method: external merge Disk: 3136kB" " -> Seq Scan on complete_cast t8 (cost=0.00..1549.64 rows=100564 width=16) (actual time=0.013..10.744 rows=100564 loops=1)" " -> Materialize (cost=1.08..1.15 rows=7 width=14) (actual time=0.016..0.029 rows=7 loops=1)" " -> Seq Scan on kind_type t9 (cost=0.00..1.07 rows=7 width=14) (actual time=0.011..0.013 rows=7 loops=1)" " -> Materialize (cost=412704.52..437969.09 rows=2021166 width=40) (actual time=3420.356..4278.545 rows=1028995 loops=1)" " -> Sort (cost=412704.52..417757.43 rows=2021166 width=40) (actual time=3420.349..3953.483 rows=1028995 loops=1)" " Sort Key: t10.movie_id" " Sort Method: external merge Disk: 90960kB" " -> Seq Scan on movie_companies t10 (cost=0.00..35214.66 rows=2021166 width=40) (actual time=13.271..566.893 rows=2021166 loops=1)" " -> Materialize (cost=3144407.19..3269057.42 rows=9972019 width=76) (actual time=65485.672..70083.219 rows=5039009 loops=1)" " -> Sort (cost=3144407.19..3169337.23 rows=9972019 width=76) (actual time=65485.667..68385.550 rows=5038999 loops=1)" " Sort Key: t11.movie_id" " Sort Method: external merge Disk: 735512kB" " -> Seq Scan on movie_info t11 (cost=0.00..212815.19 rows=9972019 width=76) (actual time=15.750..15715.608 rows=9972019 loops=1)" " -> Materialize (cost=207925.01..219867.92 rows=955433 width=50) (actual time=1483.989..1785.636 rows=429401 loops=1)" " -> Sort (cost=207925.01..210313.59 rows=955433 width=50) (actual time=1483.983..1654.165 rows=429401 loops=1)" " Sort Key: t19.movie_id" " Sort Method: external merge Disk: 31720kB" " -> Seq Scan on movie_info_idx t19 (cost=0.00..15047.33 rows=955433 width=50) (actual time=7.284..221.597 rows=955433 loops=1)" " -> Materialize (cost=501605.39..537645.64 rows=2883220 width=12) (actual time=5823.040..6868.242 rows=1597396 loops=1)" " -> Sort (cost=501605.39..508813.44 rows=2883220 width=12) (actual time=5823.026..6477.517 rows=1597396 loops=1)" " Sort Key: t12.movie_id" " Sort Method: external merge Disk: 78888kB" " -> Seq Scan on movie_keyword t12 (cost=0.00..44417.20 rows=2883220 width=12) (actual time=11.672..839.498 rows=2883220 loops=1)" " -> Materialize (cost=141143.93..152995.81 rows=948150 width=16) (actual time=1916.356..2253.004 rows=478358 loops=1)" " -> Sort (cost=141143.93..143514.31 rows=948150 width=16) (actual time=1916.344..2125.698 rows=478358 loops=1)" " Sort Key: t13.linked_movie_id" " Sort Method: external merge Disk: 29632kB" " -> Seq Scan on movie_link t13 (cost=0.00..14607.50 rows=948150 width=16) (actual time=27.610..297.962 rows=948150 loops=1)" " -> Hash (cost=1.18..1.18 rows=18 width=16) (actual time=0.020..0.020 rows=18 loops=1)" " -> Seq Scan on link_type t14 (cost=0.00..1.18 rows=18 width=16) (actual time=0.010..0.012 rows=18 loops=1)" " -> Hash (cost=1537.10..1537.10 rows=91010 width=24) (actual time=54.055..54.055 rows=91010 loops=1)" " -> Seq Scan on keyword t15 (cost=0.00..1537.10 rows=91010 width=24) (actual time=0.006..14.703 rows=91010 loops=1)" " -> Hash (cost=4585.61..4585.61 rows=245461 width=42) (actual time=445.269..445.269 rows=245461 loops=1)" " -> Seq Scan on company_name t16 (cost=0.00..4585.61 rows=245461 width=42) (actual time=12.037..309.961 rows=245461 loops=1)" " -> Hash (cost=1.04..1.04 rows=4 width=25) (actual time=0.013..0.013 rows=4 loops=1)" " -> Seq Scan on company_type t17 (cost=0.00..1.04 rows=4 width=25) (actual time=0.009..0.010 rows=4 loops=1)" " -> Hash (cost=1.04..1.04 rows=4 width=13) (actual time=0.006..0.006 rows=4 loops=1)" " -> Seq Scan on comp_cast_type t18 (cost=0.00..1.04 rows=4 width=13) (actual time=0.002..0.003 rows=4 loops=1)" "Total runtime: 147055.016 ms" Is there anyway to force the name.id = 2003 before it tries to join all the tables together? As you can see, the end result is 4 tuples but it seems like it should be a fast join by using the available index after it limited it down with the name clause, although very complex.

    Read the article

  • How to get NSFormatter subclass to work with NSTableColumn sort key and selector?

    - by Andrew
    My setup: I have a sqlite database from which I populate a NSMutableArray of NSDictionary objects this is the DataSource for my NSTableView. One of the columns holds "time", the time is a float that holds seconds. I would like to display the values in this column as minutes:seconds. For instance my data would be 123.4329387 I want to display 2:03 which I have no problem doing with a subclass of NSFormatter (or NSNumberFormatter) applied to my NSTextField in the column. I have sorting set up by using the Table Column Attributes in IB, I just have the sort key set to "time" and the selector set to "compare:" which works fine without the formatter. Currently this gives me something like this when I sort (descending) 1:37, 1:31, 0:10, 0:10, 0:09, 1:30, 1:30, 1:26, 0:09 and similar nonsense, it looks like something is going on but it's definitely not sorted. How do I get the sort to look at the underlying data instead of the formatted value? Alternately, how do I specify a custom sort method and where do I put the code for said method? I have searched around quite a bit and have not found anything to help me out with this problem, any help with this is most appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Utility of List<T>.Sort() versus List<T>.OrderBy() for a member of a custom container class

    - by ccomet
    I've found myself running back through some old 3.5 framework legacy code, and found some points where there are a whole bunch of lists and dictionaries that must be updated in a synchronized fashion. I've determined that I can make this process infinitely easier to both utilize and understand by converging these into custom container classes of new custom classes. There are some points, however, where I came to concerns with organizing the contents of these new container classes by a specific inner property. For example, sorting by the ID number property of one class. As the container classes are primarily based around a generic List object, my first instinct was to write the inner classes with IComparable, and write the CompareTo method that compares the properties. This way, I can just call items.Sort() when I want to invoke the sorting. However, I've been thinking instead about using items = items.OrderBy(Func) instead. This way it is more flexible if I need to sort by any other property. Readability is better as well, since the property used for sorting will be listed in-line with the sort call rather than having to look up the IComparable code. The overall implementation feels cleaner as a result. I don't care for premature or micro optimization, but I like consistency. I find it best to stick with one kind of implementation for as many cases as it is appropriate, and use different implementations where it is necessary. Is it worth it to convert my code to use the LINQ OrderBy instead of using List.Sort? Is it a better practice to stick with the IComparable implementation for these custom containers? Are there any significant mechanical advantages offered by either path that I should be weighing the decision on? Or is their end-functionality equivalent to the point that it just becomes coder's preference?

    Read the article

  • What does P mean in Sort(Expression<Func<T, P>> expr, ListSortDirection direction)?

    - by Grasshopper
    I am attempting to use the answer in post: How do you sort an EntitySet<T> to expose an interface so that I can sort an EntitySet with a Binding list. I have created the class below and I get the following compiler error: "The type or namespace 'P' could not be found (are you missing a using directive or assembly reference?). Can someone tell me what the P means and which namespace I need to include to get the method below to compile? I am very new to delegates and lamba expressions. Also, can someone confirm that if I create a BindingList from my EntitySet that any modifications I make to the BindingList will be made to the EntitySet? Basically, I have an EntitySet that I need to sort and make changes to. Then, I will need to persist these changes using the original Entity that the BindingList came from. public class EntitySetBindingWrapper<T> : BindingList<T> { public EntitySetBindingWrapper(BindingList<T> root) : base(root) { } public void Sort(Expression<Func<T, P>> expr, ListSortDirection direction) { if (expr == null) base.RemoveSortCore(); MemberExpression propExpr = expr as MemberExpression; if (propExpr == null) throw new ArgumentException("You must provide a property", "expr"); PropertyDescriptorCollection descriptorCol = TypeDescriptor.GetProperties(typeof(T)); IEnumerable<PropertyDescriptor> descriptors = descriptorCol.Cast<PropertyDescriptor>(); PropertyDescriptor descriptor = descriptors.First(pd => pd.Name == propExpr.Member.Name); base.ApplySortCore(descriptor, direction); } }

    Read the article

  • Use LINQ, to Sort and Filter items in a List<ReturnItem> collection, based on the values within a Li

    - by Daniel McPherson
    This is tricky to explain. We have a DataTable that contains a user configurable selection of columns, which are not known at compile time. Every column in the DataTable is of type String. We need to convert this DataTable into a strongly typed Collection of "ReturnItem" objects so that we can then sort and filter using LINQ for use in our application. We have made some progress as follows: We started with the basic DataTable. We then process the DataTable, creating a new "ReturnItem" object for each row This "ReturnItem" object has just two properties: ID ( string ) and Columns( List(object) ). The properties collection contains one entry for each column, representing a single DataRow. Each property is made Strongly Typed (int, string, datetime, etc). For example it would add a new "DateTime" object to the "ReturnItem" Columns List containing the value of the "Created" Datatable Column. The result is a List(ReturnItem) that we would then like to be able to Sort and Filter using LINQ based on the value in one of the properties, for example, sort on "Created" date. We have been using the LINQ Dynamic Query Library, which gets us so far, but it doesn't look like the way forward because we are using it over a List Collection of objects. Basically, my question boils down to: How can I use LINQ, to Sort and Filter items in a List(ReturnItem) collection, based on the values within a List(object) property which is part of the ReturnItem class?

    Read the article

  • How to sort by file's modified date on IIS web server in Windows 7?

    - by ????
    Apache has this built in since 1996 which is 17 years ago... for Microsoft's IIS Web server which is available on Windows 7, is there a way to make it be able to sort the file listing by file modification dates? For example, show the file listing with the label "Date", "Filename", and clicking it will sort the files by that attribute. The only info I could find is: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc732762(v=ws.10).aspx cd %windir%\system32\inetsrv appcmd set config /section:directoryBrowse /showFlags:Time|Size|Extension|Date|LongDate|None but it doesn't work.

    Read the article

  • How to sort a file with string lines by the number of a specific symbol in the line?

    - by SpacyRicochet
    Say I have a large plaintext file with a string on every line. The string only consists of alphabetical characters, except for underscores _, which divide the strings in syllables. I want to sort the text file by the amount underscores in the string. Bonus points for putting every group of X underscores in their own file. Example: hel_lo hi su_per_u_ser o_ver_flow would sort into: hi hel_lo o_ver_flow su_per_u_ser I've tried doing this with regex, but I've yet to find a proper way of counting the underscores (regex confuses me thoroughly). Anyone know how I could handle this?

    Read the article

  • Pagination, Duplicate Content, and SEO

    - by Iamtotallylost
    Please consider a list of items (forum comments, articles, shoes, doesn't matter) which are spread over multiple pages. Different sort orders are supported (by date, by popularity, by price, etc). So, an URL might look like this (I use the query style here to simplify things): /items?id=1234&page=42&sort=popularity /items?id=1234&page=5&sort=date Now, in terms of SEO, I think I should be worried about duplicate content. After all, each item appears at least as many times as there are sort orders. I've seen Matt Cutts talking about the rel=canonical link tag, but he also said that the canonical page should have very similar content. But this is not the case here because page #1 in a non-canonical sort order might have completely different items than page #1 in the canonical sort order. For a given non-canonical page, there is no clear canonical page listing all the same items, so I think rel=canonical won't help here. Then I thought about using the noindex meta tag on all pages with non-canonical sort order, and not using it on all pages with canonical sort order. However, if I use that method, what will happen with backlinks that are going to non-canonical pages -- will they still spread their page rank juice, even though the first page googlebot (or any other crawler) is going to encounter is marked as "noindex"? Can you please comment on my problem and what you think is the best solution? If you think you have a better solution, please consider that 1) I do not want to use Javascript for this, 2) I do not want all the items to be on one page. Thank you.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44  | Next Page >