Search Results

Search found 10188 results on 408 pages for 'ruby openid'.

Page 37/408 | < Previous Page | 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44  | Next Page >

  • Unicorn installation error on Debian 5

    - by Luc
    I am running ruby1.9 on Debian 5, and did not manage to install 'unicorn' with rubygems. I got this error and do not really know how to solve it. Do you have any idea of the possible root cause ? > gem install unicorn Building native extensions. This could take a while... ERROR: Error installing unicorn: ERROR: Failed to build gem native extension. /usr/bin/ruby1.9 extconf.rb checking for CLOCK_MONOTONIC in time.h... yes checking for clockid_t in time.h... yes checking for clock_gettime() in -lrt... yes checking for t_open() in -lnsl... no checking for socket() in -lsocket... no checking for poll() in poll.h... yes checking for getaddrinfo() in sys/types.h,sys/socket.h,netdb.h... yes checking for getnameinfo() in sys/types.h,sys/socket.h,netdb.h... yes checking for struct sockaddr_storage in sys/types.h,sys/socket.h... yes checking for accept4() in sys/socket.h... no checking for sys/select.h... yes checking for ruby/io.h... yes checking for rb_io_t.fd in ruby.h,ruby/io.h... yes checking for rb_io_t.mode in ruby.h,ruby/io.h... yes checking for rb_io_t.pathv in ruby.h,ruby/io.h... no checking for struct RFile in ruby.h,ruby/io.h... yes checking size of struct RFile in ruby.h,ruby/io.h... 24 checking for struct RObject... no checking size of int... 4 checking for rb_io_ascii8bit_binmode()... no checking for rb_thread_blocking_region()... yes checking for rb_thread_io_blocking_region()... no checking for rb_str_set_len()... yes checking for rb_time_interval()... yes checking for rb_wait_for_single_fd()... no creating Makefile make cc -I. -I/usr/include/ruby-1.9.0/x86_64-linux -I/usr/include/ruby-1.9.0 -I. -DHAVE_TYPE_CLOCKID_T -DHAVE_POLL -DHAVE_GETADDRINFO -DHAVE_GETNAMEINFO -DHAVE_TYPE_STRUCT_SOCKADDR_STORAGE -DHAVE_SYS_SELECT_H -DHAVE_RUBY_IO_H -DHAVE_RB_IO_T_FD -DHAVE_ST_FD -DHAVE_RB_IO_T_MODE -DHAVE_ST_MODE -DHAVE_TYPE_STRUCT_RFILE -DSIZEOF_STRUCT_RFILE=24 -DSIZEOF_INT=4 -DHAVE_RB_THREAD_BLOCKING_REGION -DHAVE_RB_STR_SET_LEN -DHAVE_RB_TIME_INTERVAL -D_GNU_SOURCE -DPOSIX_C_SOURCE=1-D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=200112L -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing -g -g -O2 -O2 -g -Wall -Wno-parentheses -fPIC -o kgio_ext.o -c kgio_ext.c cc -I. -I/usr/include/ruby-1.9.0/x86_64-linux -I/usr/include/ruby-1.9.0 -I. -DHAVE_TYPE_CLOCKID_T -DHAVE_POLL -DHAVE_GETADDRINFO -DHAVE_GETNAMEINFO -DHAVE_TYPE_STRUCT_SOCKADDR_STORAGE -DHAVE_SYS_SELECT_H -DHAVE_RUBY_IO_H -DHAVE_RB_IO_T_FD -DHAVE_ST_FD -DHAVE_RB_IO_T_MODE -DHAVE_ST_MODE -DHAVE_TYPE_STRUCT_RFILE -DSIZEOF_STRUCT_RFILE=24 -DSIZEOF_INT=4 -DHAVE_RB_THREAD_BLOCKING_REGION -DHAVE_RB_STR_SET_LEN -DHAVE_RB_TIME_INTERVAL -D_GNU_SOURCE -DPOSIX_C_SOURCE=1-D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=200112L -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing -g -g -O2 -O2 -g -Wall -Wno-parentheses -fPIC -o autopush.o -c autopush.c cc -I. -I/usr/include/ruby-1.9.0/x86_64-linux -I/usr/include/ruby-1.9.0 -I. -DHAVE_TYPE_CLOCKID_T -DHAVE_POLL -DHAVE_GETADDRINFO -DHAVE_GETNAMEINFO -DHAVE_TYPE_STRUCT_SOCKADDR_STORAGE -DHAVE_SYS_SELECT_H -DHAVE_RUBY_IO_H -DHAVE_RB_IO_T_FD -DHAVE_ST_FD -DHAVE_RB_IO_T_MODE -DHAVE_ST_MODE -DHAVE_TYPE_STRUCT_RFILE -DSIZEOF_STRUCT_RFILE=24 -DSIZEOF_INT=4 -DHAVE_RB_THREAD_BLOCKING_REGION -DHAVE_RB_STR_SET_LEN -DHAVE_RB_TIME_INTERVAL -D_GNU_SOURCE -DPOSIX_C_SOURCE=1-D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=200112L -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing -g -g -O2 -O2 -g -Wall -Wno-parentheses -fPIC -o wait.o -c wait.c cc -I. -I/usr/include/ruby-1.9.0/x86_64-linux -I/usr/include/ruby-1.9.0 -I. -DHAVE_TYPE_CLOCKID_T -DHAVE_POLL -DHAVE_GETADDRINFO -DHAVE_GETNAMEINFO -DHAVE_TYPE_STRUCT_SOCKADDR_STORAGE -DHAVE_SYS_SELECT_H -DHAVE_RUBY_IO_H -DHAVE_RB_IO_T_FD -DHAVE_ST_FD -DHAVE_RB_IO_T_MODE -DHAVE_ST_MODE -DHAVE_TYPE_STRUCT_RFILE -DSIZEOF_STRUCT_RFILE=24 -DSIZEOF_INT=4 -DHAVE_RB_THREAD_BLOCKING_REGION -DHAVE_RB_STR_SET_LEN -DHAVE_RB_TIME_INTERVAL -D_GNU_SOURCE -DPOSIX_C_SOURCE=1-D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=200112L -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing -g -g -O2 -O2 -g -Wall -Wno-parentheses -fPIC -o connect.o -c connect.c cc -I. -I/usr/include/ruby-1.9.0/x86_64-linux -I/usr/include/ruby-1.9.0 -I. -DHAVE_TYPE_CLOCKID_T -DHAVE_POLL -DHAVE_GETADDRINFO -DHAVE_GETNAMEINFO -DHAVE_TYPE_STRUCT_SOCKADDR_STORAGE -DHAVE_SYS_SELECT_H -DHAVE_RUBY_IO_H -DHAVE_RB_IO_T_FD -DHAVE_ST_FD -DHAVE_RB_IO_T_MODE -DHAVE_ST_MODE -DHAVE_TYPE_STRUCT_RFILE -DSIZEOF_STRUCT_RFILE=24 -DSIZEOF_INT=4 -DHAVE_RB_THREAD_BLOCKING_REGION -DHAVE_RB_STR_SET_LEN -DHAVE_RB_TIME_INTERVAL -D_GNU_SOURCE -DPOSIX_C_SOURCE=1-D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=200112L -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing -g -g -O2 -O2 -g -Wall -Wno-parentheses -fPIC -o poll.o -c poll.c poll.c:11:18: error: st.h: No such file or directory poll.c: In function 'do_poll': poll.c:148: error: 'RUBY_UBF_IO' undeclared (first use in this function) poll.c:148: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once poll.c:148: error: for each function it appears in.) make: *** [poll.o] Error 1 Gem files will remain installed in /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.0/gems/kgio-2.5.0 for inspection. Results logged to /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.0/gems/kgio-2.5.0/ext/kgio/gem_make.out

    Read the article

  • Using Ruby on share web hosts

    - by Parhum
    We are developing a Wordpress theme and we are going to publish it on themeforest.com. We are using Sass(scss Syntax) as our CSS Preprocessor and we need to compile it on server side. We have two solutions: Use phpsass which is a php script(but it has some bugs) Use Ruby Compiler which most of wordpress plugins use this I noticed that plugins which use Ruby need to have PHP proc_open function enabled on server. My question is what are Pros and Cons of using Ruby compiler on servers? and are most of shared web hosts support Ruby and have PHP proc_open function enabled by default?

    Read the article

  • Ruby installed on Ubuntu 10.10 slow on one machine but not other

    - by Aaron Jensen
    I have a machine that was provisioned several months ago. RVM was used to install ruby 1.9.3-p125 as well as 1.9.3-p125-perf. When I compared raw ruby performance to another identical machine the older machine smoked them. For example: ================================================================================ With in-block needle calculation ================================================================================ Rehearsal ---------------------------------------------- detect 3.790000 0.000000 3.790000 ( 3.800895) each 2.410000 0.000000 2.410000 ( 2.420860) any 3.960000 0.000000 3.960000 ( 3.972099) include 1.440000 0.000000 1.440000 ( 1.442862) ------------------------------------ total: 11.600000sec vs ================================================================================ With in-block needle calculation ================================================================================ Rehearsal ---------------------------------------------- detect 10.740000 0.000000 10.740000 ( 10.769366) each 6.080000 0.010000 6.090000 ( 6.106323) any 10.600000 0.000000 10.600000 ( 10.641606) include 4.160000 0.000000 4.160000 ( 4.171530) ------------------------------------ total: 31.590000sec I attempted to reinstall 1.9.3-p125 with rvm on the fast machine and that ruby is now slow. It's as if something changed in RVM, or I installed some package that made compiled versions of ruby perform significantly worse. I know this is a tough question to answer, but what things should I look into in order to track down why the performance has suffered so much? edit I just attempted to install with ruby-build and the version installed was fast. Something rvm is doing to build it in my environment is slow.

    Read the article

  • Missing functions in ruby 1.8

    - by Adrian
    I have a ruby gem that I developed with ruby 1.9, and it works. With ruby 1.8, though, it says this when I try to run it: dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: Symbol not found: _RBIGNUM_SIGN Referenced from: /Users/Adrian/Desktop/num_to_bytes/ext/num_to_bytes/num_to_bytes.bundle Expected in: flat namespace dyld: Symbol not found: _RBIGNUM_SIGN Referenced from: /Users/Adrian/Desktop/num_to_bytes/ext/num_to_bytes/num_to_bytes.bundle Expected in: flat namespace Trace/BPT trap If I comment out the line that uses RBIGNUM_SIGN, it complains about other functions like rb_big_modulo. Some things work, like NUM2LONG. Here are some things I have tried: In http://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/ruby_1_8_7/ruby.h, RBIGNUM_SIGN is defined. But in all versions of ruby I have tried, it is not there. I guessed that maybe it was defined in a different .h file. Knowing that Hpricot works with 1.8, I looked at http://github.com/hpricot/hpricot/blob/master/ext/hpricot_scan/hpricot_scan.h. It doesn't include any other files that #define it. Putting things like extern VALUE rb_big_modulo(VALUE x); at the beginning of my extension don't help. Using a brand new Ubuntu installation, I apt-getted ruby, tried to install the gem, and it didn't work either. Putting have_library 'ruby', 'rb_big_modulo' in my extconf.rb didn't work. As you can probably see, I am getting desperate (after weeks of trying things!). So, how can I get this to work? Here is the gem: http://rubygems.org/gems/num_to_bytes Here is the source: http://gist.github.com/404584

    Read the article

  • Why do people say that Ruby is slow?

    - by stephen murdoch
    I like Ruby on Rails and I use it for all my web development projects. A few years ago there was a lot of talk about Rails being a memory hog and about how it didn't scale very well but these suggestions were put to bed by Gregg Pollack here. Lately though, I've been hearing people saying that Ruby itself is slow. Why is Ruby considered slow? I do not find Ruby to be slow but then again, I'm just using it to make simple CRUD apps and company blogs. What sort of projects would I need to be doing before I find Ruby becoming slow? Or is this slowness just something that affects all programming languages? What are your options as a Ruby programmer if you want to deal with this "slowness"? Which version of Ruby would best suit an application like Stack Overflow where speed is critical and traffic is intense? The questions are subjective, and I realise that architectural setup (EC2 vs standalone servers etc) makes a big difference but I'd like to hear what people think about Ruby being slow. Finally, I can't find much news on Ruby 2.0 - I take it we're a good few years away from that then?

    Read the article

  • What should a Python developer know while learning Ruby?

    - by C J
    I have been a Python programmer for about 18 months, consisting of one internship and a few side projects, and I consider myself pretty comfortable in the language. However, there seems to be a lot of attention on Ruby in the programming field, but not a lot on Python anymore. So in learning Ruby, are there going to be Pythonic things that are just bad practices in Ruby? What should I watch out for, and what should I avoid?

    Read the article

  • Force ruby to use dbi Gem instead of dbi in site_ruby

    - by sutch
    I'm using: Windows 7 Ruby 1.8.6 One-Click Installer DBI version 0.4.3 installed using RubyGems What I see when executing these commands: C:ruby -v ruby 1.8.6 (2008-08-11 patchlevel 287) [i386-mswin32] C:gem -v 1.3.1 C:ruby -r rubygems -r dbi -e "puts DBI::VERSION" 0.2.2 C:gem list dbi *** LOCAL GEMS *** dbi (0.4.3) Why do ruby scripts use the DBI installed in site_ruby rather than the DBI installed with RubyGems? Updated to respond to Luis Lavena's answer... Here's what happened when I attempted what you suggest: C:ruby -r rubygems -e "require 'rubygems'; puts DBI::VERSION" -e:1: uninitialized constant DBI (NameError) And when I updated to require DBI: C:ruby -r rubygems -e "require 'rubygems' ; require 'dbi' ; puts DBI::VERSION" 0.2.2 Why wouldn't RubyGems override the built-in library?

    Read the article

  • Common Ruby Idioms

    - by DanSingerman
    One thing I love about ruby is that mostly it is a very readable language (which is great for self-documenting code) However, inspired by this question: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/609612/ruby-code-explained and the description of how ||= works in ruby, I was thinking about the ruby idioms I don't use, as frankly, I don't fully grok them. So my question is, similar to the example from the referenced question, what common, but not obvious, ruby idioms do I need to be aware of to be a truly proficient ruby programmer? By the way, from the referenced question a ||= b is equivalent to if a == nil || a == false a = b end (Thanks to Ian Terrell for the correction) Edit: It turns out this point is not totally uncontroversial. The correct expansion is in fact (a || (a = (b))) See these links for why: http://DABlog.RubyPAL.Com/2008/3/25/a-short-circuit-edge-case/ http://DABlog.RubyPAL.Com/2008/3/26/short-circuit-post-correction/ http://ProcNew.Com/ruby-short-circuit-edge-case-response.html Thanks to Jörg W Mittag for pointing this out.

    Read the article

  • Installing Ruby Gems behind a Proxy

    - by jjr2527
    It appears this topic has been covered a few times before, but those solutions have only gotten me so far. I now have my sources properly updated and I am able to query for gems without an error but I keep getting empty results for my searches. I installed rubysspi and copied over the spa.rb file as mentioned in the readme. The readme also suggested using this line which did not work for me based on my install path: ruby -rspa 'C:\Program Files\ruby\gem' list --remote sspi So I switched it to my install directory off the root: ruby -rspa 'C:\ruby\gem' list --remote sspi But that also didn't work so a search for the gem file located it in the bin directory so this command finally worked for me: ruby -rspa 'C:\ruby\bin\gem' list --remote sspi But I got empty results back: *** REMOTE GEMS *** SO I tried other gems and had the same results. Then I listed my gem sources and rubygems is listed as expected. Am I missing something else? c:\ruby>gem sources *** CURRENT SOURCES *** http://rubygems.org

    Read the article

  • rbenv not changing ruby version

    - by user1443338
    So i installed rbenv according to the github directions. I am running OSX but i have tried this on a Ubuntu 12.04 VM and got the same results. The following is what i get in my terminal when i try to change ruby versions: rbenv versions * 1.9.3-p0 (set by /Users/user/.rbenv/version) 1.9.3-p125 rbenv global 1.9.3-p0 rbenv rehash ruby -v ruby 1.8.7 (2011-12-28 patchlevel 357) [universal-darwin11.0] which ruby /usr/bin/ruby Anyone have any ideas as to why rbenv isnt actually switching the ruby version like it thinks it is? Aslo there is no .rbenv file in the local directory that would be causing the ruby version to default to 1.8.7 rbenv local rbenv: no local version configured for this directory

    Read the article

  • GDD-BR 2010 [0H] OpenID-based single sign-on and OAuth data access

    GDD-BR 2010 [0H] OpenID-based single sign-on and OAuth data access Speaker: Ryan Boyd Track: Chrome and HTML5 Time slot: H[17:20 - 18:05] Room: 0 A discussion of all the auth tangles you've encountered so far -- OpenID, SSO, 2-Legged OAuth, 3-Legged OAuth, and Hybrid OAuth. We'll show you when and where to use them, and explain how they all integrate with Google APIs and other developer products. From: GoogleDevelopers Views: 11 0 ratings Time: 41:24 More in Science & Technology

    Read the article

  • What is the benefit of using ONLY OpenID authentication on a site?

    - by Peter
    From my experience with OpenID, I see a number of significant downsides: Adds a Single Point of Failure to the site It is not a failure that can be fixed by the site even if detected. If the OpenID provider is down for three days, what recourse does the site have to allow its users to login and access the information they own? Takes a user to another sites content and every time they logon to your site Even if the OpenID provider does not have an error, the user is re-directed to their site to login. The login page has content and links. So there is a chance a user will actually be drawn away from the site to go down the Internet rabbit hole. Why would I want to send my users to another company's website? [ Note: my provider no longer does this and seems to have fixed this problem (for now).] Adds a non-trivial amount of time to the signup To sign up with the site a new user is forced to read a new standard, chose a provider, and signup. Standards are something that the technical people should agree to in order to make a user experience frictionless. They are not something that should be thrust on the users. It is a Phisher's Dream OpenID is incredibly insecure and stealing the person's ID as they log in is trivially easy. [ taken from David Arno's Answer below ] For all of the downside, the one upside is to allow users to have fewer logins on the Internet. If a site has opt-in for OpenID then users who want that feature can use it. What I would like to understand is: What benefit does a site get for making OpenID mandatory?

    Read the article

  • I can't generate migrations - "illegal route the controller must be specified" - where am I going wr

    - by ro
    Background: i'm using InstantRails 2.0 I'm wanted to add a new column to an existing table using the following syntax: ruby script/generate migration add_fieldname_to_tablename fieldname:string So I tried ruby script/generate migration add_invites_to_user invites:integer ruby script/generate migration add_invites_to_users invites:integer And to test it further ruby script/generate migration AddInvites ruby script/generate migration AddInvites invites:integer All of the above give me builder.rb:175 in 'build': Illegal route: the :controller must be specified! (ArgumentError)

    Read the article

  • Explicit return from a Ruby method - implementation hiding, reuse and optimisations.

    - by Chris McCauley
    Hi, Rather than allowing a Ruby method to blindly return the last statement evaluated, is there any advantage to returning nil explicitly? In terms of implementation hiding and reuse, it seems dangerous to blindly allow the last expression evaluated to be returned - isn't there a danger that a user will rely on this only to get a nasty surprise when the implementation is modified? Surely returning nil would be better unless an explicit return value was given. Following on, is there an optimisation that Ruby can make when the return is a simple type rather than a reference to a more complex object? Chris

    Read the article

  • xapian-full installed on mac os x snow leopard but failed with dlopen LoadError

    - by goodwill
    Since I have tried to install xapian but failed, I try another alternative with xapian-full. Installation seems goes well, but when I try to write code with that I got toasted with error message again: irb(main):001:0> require 'xapian' LoadError: dlopen(/opt/ruby-enterprise/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/xapian-full-1.1.3.4/lib/_xapian.bundle, 9): Library not loaded: /usr/local/lib/libxapian-1.1.3.dylib Referenced from: /opt/ruby-enterprise/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/xapian-full-1.1.3.4/lib/_xapian.bundle Reason: image not found - /opt/ruby-enterprise/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/xapian-full-1.1.3.4/lib/_xapian.bundle from /opt/ruby-enterprise/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/xapian-full-1.1.3.4/lib/_xapian.bundle from /opt/ruby-enterprise/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:36:in `require' from /opt/ruby-enterprise/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/xapian.rb:40 from /opt/ruby-enterprise/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `gem_original_require' from /opt/ruby-enterprise/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `require' from (irb):1 Anyone know how to solve this?

    Read the article

  • How can I install Ruby on Rails 3 on OSX?

    - by Oluf Nielsen
    Hey i got an White Macbook and, has to go in 10 hours to a conference. And I'm having a lot of problems. First, I wanted to have Rails 3, so I used MacPorts to install Ruby 1.8.7. Tt worked well ;) So now I was thinking I should install Rails 3.. but no, no!.. it says.. $ sudo gem install rails --pre ERROR:   Error installing rails:                  activesupport requires Ruby version = 1.8.7. So what can I do? I have 1.8.7 !

    Read the article

  • Explicit return form a Ruby method - implementation hiding, reuse and optimisations.

    - by Chris McCauley
    Hi, Rather than allowing a Ruby method to blindly return the last statement evaluated, is there any advantage to returning nil explicitly? In terms of implementation hiding and reuse, it seems dangerous to blindly allow the last expression evaluated to be returned - isn't there a danger that a user will rely on this only to get a nasty surprise when the implementation is modified? Surely returning nil would be better unless an explicit return value was given. Following on, is there an optimisation that Ruby can make when the return is a simple type rather than a reference to a more complex object? Chris

    Read the article

  • Does ActiveRecord make Ruby on Rails code hard to test?

    - by Erik Öjebo
    I've spent most of my time in statically typed languages (primarily C#). I have some bad experiences with the Active Record pattern and unit testing, because of the static methods and the mix of entities and data access code. Since the Ruby community probably is the most test driven of the communities out there, and the Rails ActiveRecord seems popular, there must be some way of combining TDD and ActiveRecord based code in Ruby on Rails. I would guess that the problem goes away in dynamic languages, somehow, but I don't see how. So, what's the trick?

    Read the article

  • Simplest possible rack app -> permission error

    - by 7stud
    Here's the program(1.rb) blah blah blah blah blah blah: require 'rack' my_rack = lambda { |env| [200, {}, ["Hello. The time is: #{Time.now}"]] } handler = Rack::Handler::WEBrick handler.run(my_rack, :PORT => 12_500) Here's the error (blah blah blah blah blah): ~/ruby_programs$ ruby 1.rb [2012-12-07 21:49:09] INFO WEBrick 1.3.1 [2012-12-07 21:49:09] INFO ruby 1.9.3 (2012-04-20) [x86_64-darwin10.8.0] [2012-12-07 21:49:09] WARN TCPServer Error: Permission denied - bind(2) [2012-12-07 21:49:09] WARN TCPServer Error: Permission denied - bind(2) /Users/7stud/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.3-p194/lib/ruby/1.9.1/webrick/utils.rb:85:in `initialize': Permission denied - bind(2) (Errno::EACCES) from /Users/7stud/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.3-p194/lib/ruby/1.9.1/webrick/utils.rb:85:in `new' from /Users/7stud/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.3-p194/lib/ruby/1.9.1/webrick/utils.rb:85:in `block in create_listeners' from /Users/7stud/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.3-p194/lib/ruby/1.9.1/webrick/utils.rb:82:in `each' from /Users/7stud/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.3-p194/lib/ruby/1.9.1/webrick/utils.rb:82:in `create_listeners' from /Users/7stud/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.3-p194/lib/ruby/1.9.1/webrick/server.rb:82:in `listen' from /Users/7stud/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.3-p194/lib/ruby/1.9.1/webrick/server.rb:70:in `initialize' from /Users/7stud/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.3-p194/lib/ruby/1.9.1/webrick/httpserver.rb:45:in `initialize' from /Users/7stud/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p194@programming/gems/rack-1.4.1/lib/rack/handler/webrick.rb:10:in `new' from /Users/7stud/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p194@programming/gems/rack-1.4.1/lib/rack/handler/webrick.rb:10:in `run' from 1.rb:5:in `<main>' ~/ruby_programs$ Here's line 85 of ../webrick/utils.rb: sock = TCPServer.new(ai[3], port) If I replace the code in 1.rb with this: require 'socket' server = TCPServer.new 12_000 # Server bind to port 2000 loop do client = server.accept # Wait for a client to connect client.puts "Hello !" client.puts "Time is #{Time.now}" client.close end I don't get any errors, and if I enter the address: http://localhost:12000/ in my browser, I get the expected output: Hello ! Time is 2012-12-07 18:58:15 -0700

    Read the article

  • How can I set the Rails environment for my somewhat stand alone Ruby script?

    - by Nick
    I have a Ruby script in my Rails app that I use to load some data from Twitter. In the future I will make it an automatic background process, but for now I run it manually like: ruby /lib/twitter/twitterLoad.rb In order to use the Rails model classes and such, I have the following as the top line of the script: require "#{File.dirname(__FILE__)}/../../config/environment.rb" By default, the development environment is used. But, I'd like to be able to choose the production environment at some point. Update #1: The RAILS_ENV constant is getting set in the environment.rb file. So, I was able to put ENV['RAILS_ENV'] = 'production' at the very top (before the environment.rb) line and solve my problem somewhat. So, my new question is, can do pass in env vars through the command line?

    Read the article

  • What's a good way to set up a development environment on OS X for ruby, rails, and git?

    - by Ein2015
    I'm going to start development on a web app using ruby, rails, probably either postgres or mysql, and most likely apache. I'll be using a git repository with the master repo on another server. I've searched through stackoverflow and done some Googling... so here's what I have so far... What are your opinions on what's described on this page?: http://robots.thoughtbot.com/post/159805668/2009-rubyists-guide-to-a-mac-os-x-development What about this one?: http://www.buildingwebapps.com/articles/79197-setting-up-rails-on-leopard-mac I don't need helping finding an editor, there's plenty out there (TextMate, TextWrangler, MacVim), but I do need help to make sure I'm setting things up correctly to code, build, and run the web app from my mac. Here's a specific set of scenarios I could use some help on: Testing various versions of rails and/or ruby. Testing performance, vulnerabilities, monitoring queries, etc. Testing different versions of gems. Working on other projects on this same machine.

    Read the article

  • Ruby Koans 202: Why does the correct answer give a syntax error?

    - by hlh
    I'm working through the about_classes.rb file in the Ruby Koans, and have hit a brick wall with the "inside_a_method_self_refers_to_the_containing_object" test. Here's the code: class Dog7 attr_reader :name def initialize(initial_name) @name = initial_name end def get_self self end def to_s __ end def inspect "<Dog named '#{name}'>" end end def test_inside_a_method_self_refers_to_the_containing_object fido = Dog7.new("Fido") fidos_self = fido.get_self assert_equal <Dog named 'Fido'>, fidos_self end So, I'm trying to make the first half of the assert_equal evaluate to the second half (fidos_self). When I work it out in irb, fidos_self returns <Dog named 'Fido'>, but I keep receiving a syntax error for that answer. I've seen this similar post: Ruby Koans: Where are the quotes in this return value?, but his solution (putting fido instead of <Dog named 'Fido'>) causes my rake to abort, saying the stack level is too deep. This is driving me nuts. What am I missing here?

    Read the article

  • How does ruby allow a method and a Class with the same name?

    - by Daniel Beardsley
    I happened to be working on a Singleton class in ruby and just remembered the way it works in factory_girl. They worked it out so you can use both the long way Factory.create(...) and the short way Factory(...) I thought about it and was curious to see how they made the class Factory also behave like a method. They simply used Factory twice like so: def Factory (args) ... end class Factory ... end My Question is: How does ruby accomplish this? and Is there danger in using this seemingly quirky pattern?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44  | Next Page >