Search Results

Search found 26908 results on 1077 pages for 'asynchronous wcf call'.

Page 371/1077 | < Previous Page | 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378  | Next Page >

  • What is the most appropriate testing method in this scenario?

    - by Daniel Bruce
    I'm writing some Objective-C apps (for OS X/iOS) and I'm currently implementing a service to be shared across them. The service is intended to be fairly self-contained. For the current functionality I'm envisioning there will be only one method that clients will call to do a fairly complicated series of steps both using private methods on the class, and passing data through a bunch of "data mangling classes" to arrive at an end result. The gist of the code is to fetch a log of changes, stored in a service-internal data store, that has occurred since a particular time, simplify the log to only include the last applicable change for each object, attach the serialized values for the affected objects and return this all to the client. My question then is, how do I unit-test this entry point method? Obviously, each class would have thorough unit tests to ensure that their functionality works as expected, but the entry point seems harder to "disconnect" from the rest of the world. I would rather not send in each of these internal classes IoC-style, because they're small and are only made classes to satisfy the single-responsibility principle. I see a couple possibilities: Create a "private" interface header for the tests with methods that call the internal classes and test each of these methods separately. Then, to test the entry point, make a partial mock of the service class with these private methods mocked out and just test that the methods are called with the right arguments. Write a series of fatter tests for the entry point without mocking out anything, testing the entire functionality in one go. This looks, to me, more like "integration testing" and seems brittle, but it does satisfy the "only test via the public interface" principle. Write a factory that returns these internal services and take that in the initializer, then write a factory that returns mocked versions of them to use in tests. This has the downside of making the construction of the service annoying, and leaks internal details to the client. Write a "private" initializer that take these services as extra parameters, use that to provide mocked services, and have the public initializer back-end to this one. This would ensure that the client code still sees the easy/pretty initializer and no internals are leaked. I'm sure there's more ways to solve this problem that I haven't thought of yet, but my question is: what's the most appropriate approach according to unit testing best practices? Especially considering I would prefer to write this test-first, meaning I should preferably only create these services as the code indicates a need for them.

    Read the article

  • HTML5 : version finale pour 2014, un report est nécessaire pour développer une suite de tests d'interopérabilité d'après le W3C

    HTML5 : version finale pour 2014 Un report est nécessaire pour développer une suite de tests d'interopérabilité d'après le WC3 Mise à jour du 15/02/2011 par Idelways L'HTML5 ne sera pas prêt avant 2014 d'après la nouvelle charte de son groupe de travail aux W3C, le consortium en charge des spécifications sur lequel s'appuiera le futur du développement Web. Le standard ouvert devrait atteindre le stade du « dernier appel » (Last Call) en mai prochain, une étape charnière qui correspond à la satisfaction des exigences techniques. Les communautés des développeurs seront dès lors appelées à commenter les spéci...

    Read the article

  • PROUHD: RAID for the end-user

    <b>Linuxconfig:</b> "Therefore, there is currently no storage solution that manages heterogeneous storage devices efficiently. In this article, we propose such a solution and we call it PROUHD (Pool of RAID Over User Heterogeneous Devices)."

    Read the article

  • Iterator

    Imagine that you are game developer. Your game is war stategy. Army has complicated structure: it consists with Hero and three Groups. When King gives decree to treat all soldiers (Hero is also soldier) you want to iterate through all soldiers and call treat() method on each soldier instance. How ca

    Read the article

  • Sempron 145 core unlocking

    - by Grant
    Call me a cheapskate looking for performance, but I have a Sempron 145 processor that has been unlocked to an Athlon II X2 4450e with a GIGABYTE GA-990FXA-UD3 motherboard, but only one of the two processor cores can be used at a time. If both of the cores are enabled in the BIOS the kernel will hang during boot, If I reboot the system and disable the second core (but not re-lock the processor), it will take me to the grub and then start normally. Is there a way to enable both cores and boot without kernel hangs?

    Read the article

  • How to mention your responsibilities if you are the only programmer in resume [closed]

    - by user105919
    I worked for a company for 1.5 years as web developer. As i was the only IT person in the company , i used to do all work by myself. Now i am applying for new job and i want to write all the sys admin stuff i used to do there. Now my main concern is that if the new employer call that old company then they will only say that he was web developer a sthey won't know the technical diff between sys admin and php coding. will the employer trust me or not

    Read the article

  • C# Drawing On Separate Thread [migrated]

    - by Zaid
    I have a "public static" class called "DrawTest" and inside is a method public static DrawRandomRectangle(Bitmap g) { } I want to call that method and draw bunches of stuff and then update the pictureBox that uses the image on a separate thread. To simplify, I'm not trying to make anything specific I'm just trying to learn how to draw and update an image inside of a picturebox on a separate thread.

    Read the article

  • Circular class dependency

    - by shad0w
    Is it bad design to have 2 classes which need each other? I'm writing a small game in which I have a GameEngine class which has got a few GameState objects. To access several rendering methods, these GameState objects also need to know the GameEngine class - so it's a circular dependency. Would you call this bad design? I am just asking, because I am not quite sure and at this time I am still able to refactor these things.

    Read the article

  • 5 Reasons to Having Sitemap For SEO

    When you talk about optimizing a site, there are lot many ways and tricks which you can use for it. But from my point of view, there is a way whose importance is mostly underestimated. We call it Sitemaps. This is one of the most important and fruitful way to optimize a site.

    Read the article

  • Is it dangerous for me to give some of my Model classes Control-like methods?

    - by Pureferret
    In my personal project I have tried to stick to MVC, but I've also been made aware that sticking to MVC too tightly can be a bad thing as it makes writing awkward and forces the flow of the program in odd ways (i.e. some simple functions can be performed by something that normally wouldn't, and avoid MVC related overheads). So I'm beginning to feel justified in this compromise: I have some 'manager programs' that 'own' data and have some way to manipulate it, as such I think they'd count as both part of the model, and part of the control, and to me this feels more natural than keepingthem separate. For instance: One of my Managers is the PlayerCharacterManager that has these methods: void buySkill(PlayerCharacter playerCharacter, Skill skill); void changeName(); void changeRole(); void restatCharacter(); void addCharacterToGame(); void createNewCharacter(); PlayerCharacter getPlayerCharacter(); List<PlayerCharacter> getPlayersCharacter(Player player); List<PlayerCharacter> getAllCharacters(); I hope the mothod names are transparent enough that they don't all need explaining. I've called it a manager because it will help manage all of the PlayerCharacter 'model' objects the code creates, and create and keep a map of these. I may also get it to store other information in the future. I plan to have another two similar classes for this sort of control, but I will orchestrate when and how this happens, and what to do with the returned data via a pure controller class. This splitting up control between informed managers and the controller, as opposed to operating just through a controller seems like it will simplify my code and make it flow more. My question is, is this a dangerous choice, in terms of making the code harder to follow/test/fix? Is this somethign established as good or bad or neutral? I oculdn't find anything similar except the idea of Actors but that's not quite why I'm trying to do. Edit: Perhaps an example is needed; I'm using the Controller to update the view and access the data, so when I click the 'Add new character to a player button' it'll call methods in the controller that then go and tell the PlayerCharacterManager class to create a new character instance, it'll call the PlayerManager class to add that new character to the player-character map, and then it'll add this information to the database, and tell the view to update any GUIs effected. That is the sort of 'control sequence' I'm hoping to create with these manager classes.

    Read the article

  • Getting a SecurityToken from a RequestSecurityTokenResponse in WIF

    - by Shawn Cicoria
    When you’re working with WIF and WSTrustChannelFactory when you call the Issue operation, you can also request that a RequestSecurityTokenResponse as an out parameter. However, what can you do with that object?  Well, you could keep it around and use it for subsequent calls with the extension method CreateChannelWithIssuedToken – or can you? public static T CreateChannelWithIssuedToken<T>(this ChannelFactory<T> factory, SecurityToken issuedToken);   As you can see from the method signature it takes a SecurityToken – but that’s not present on the RequestSecurityTokenResponse class. However, you can through a little magic get a GenericXmlSecurityToken by means of the following set of extension methods below – just call rstr.GetSecurityTokenFromResponse() – and you’ll get a GenericXmlSecurityToken as a return. public static class TokenHelper { /// <summary> /// Takes a RequestSecurityTokenResponse, pulls out the GenericXmlSecurityToken usable for further WS-Trust calls /// </summary> /// <param name="rstr"></param> /// <returns></returns> public static GenericXmlSecurityToken GetSecurityTokenFromResponse(this RequestSecurityTokenResponse rstr) { var lifeTime = rstr.Lifetime; var appliesTo = rstr.AppliesTo.Uri; var tokenXml = rstr.GetSerializedTokenFromResponse(); var token = GetTokenFromSerializedToken(tokenXml, appliesTo, lifeTime); return token; } /// <summary> /// Provides a token as an XML string. /// </summary> /// <param name="rstr"></param> /// <returns></returns> public static string GetSerializedTokenFromResponse(this RequestSecurityTokenResponse rstr) { var serializedRst = new WSFederationSerializer().GetResponseAsString(rstr, new WSTrustSerializationContext()); return serializedRst; } /// <summary> /// Turns the XML representation of the token back into a GenericXmlSecurityToken. /// </summary> /// <param name="tokenAsXmlString"></param> /// <param name="appliesTo"></param> /// <param name="lifetime"></param> /// <returns></returns> public static GenericXmlSecurityToken GetTokenFromSerializedToken(this string tokenAsXmlString, Uri appliesTo, Lifetime lifetime) { RequestSecurityTokenResponse rstr2 = new WSFederationSerializer().CreateResponse( new SignInResponseMessage(appliesTo, tokenAsXmlString), new WSTrustSerializationContext()); return new GenericXmlSecurityToken( rstr2.RequestedSecurityToken.SecurityTokenXml, new BinarySecretSecurityToken( rstr2.RequestedProofToken.ProtectedKey.GetKeyBytes()), lifetime.Created.HasValue ? lifetime.Created.Value : DateTime.MinValue, lifetime.Expires.HasValue ? lifetime.Expires.Value : DateTime.MaxValue, rstr2.RequestedAttachedReference, rstr2.RequestedUnattachedReference, null); } }

    Read the article

  • "Whole-team" C++ features?

    - by Blaisorblade
    In C++, features like exceptions impact your whole program: you can either disable them in your whole program, or you need to deal with them throughout your code. As a famous article on C++ Report puts it: Counter-intuitively, the hard part of coding exceptions is not the explicit throws and catches. The really hard part of using exceptions is to write all the intervening code in such a way that an arbitrary exception can propagate from its throw site to its handler, arriving safely and without damaging other parts of the program along the way. Since even new throws exceptions, every function needs to provide basic exception safety — unless it only calls functions which guarantee throwing no exception — unless you disable exceptions altogether in your whole project. Hence, exceptions are a "whole-program" or "whole-team" feature, since they must be understood by everybody in a team using them. But not all C++ features are like that, as far as I know. A possible example is that if I don't get templates but I do not use them, I will still be able to write correct C++ — or will I not?. I can even call sort on an array of integers and enjoy its amazing speed advantage wrt. C's qsort (because no function pointer is called), without risking bugs — or not? It seems templates are not "whole-team". Are there other C++ features which impact code not directly using them, and are hence "whole-team"? I am especially interested in features not present in C. Update: I'm especially looking for features where there's no language-enforced sign you need to be aware of them. The first answer I got mentioned const-correctness, which is also whole-team, hence everybody needs to learn about it; however, AFAICS it will impact you only if you call a function which is marked const, and the compiler will prevent you from calling it on non-const objects, so you get something to google for. With exceptions, you don't even get that; moreover, they're always used as soon as you use new, hence exceptions are more "insidious". Since I can't phrase this as objectively, though, I will appreciate any whole-team feature. Appendix: Why this question is objective (if you wonder) C++ is a complex language, so many projects or coding guides try to select "simple" C++ features, and many people try to include or exclude some ones according to mostly subjective criteria. Questions about that get rightfully closed regularly here on SO. Above, instead, I defined (as precisely as possible) what a "whole-team" language feature is, provide an example (exceptions), together with extensive supporting evidence in the literature about C++, and ask for whole-team features in C++ beyond exceptions. Whether you should use "whole-team" features, or whether that's a relevant concept, might be subjective — but that only means the importance of this question is subjective, like always.

    Read the article

  • when including a file using php function not work?

    - by John Smiith
    MY PHP FUNCTION IS function functionName() { include($_SERVER['DOCUMENT_ROOT']."/path/file.php"); } Content of File.php is $foo = 'bar'; Calling function (content of file test.php) functionName(); When call function and variable not work echo $foo; <- not works But when adding code below its works (content of file test.php) include($_SERVER['DOCUMENT_ROOT']."/path/file.php"); echo $foo; <- its works

    Read the article

  • alias/function with command line arguments

    - by Agzam
    I'm tired of typing manage.py startserver 10.211.55.4:4000, so decided to make an alias for that. Only thing is: the port sometime changes. So I did this in bash profile: function runserver() { python manage.py runserver 10.211.55.4:$1 } But then when I call it: runserver 3000, it starts it, but immediately stops saying: "Error: That IP address can't be assigned-to". However if I type the same thing right into command line it works with no complains.

    Read the article

  • Sortie de la version 3.6.0 de la librairie OCILIB, le driver Oracle open source et portable

    Une nouvelle version 3.6.0 de la bibliothèque open source OCILIB (C Driver for Oracle) est disponible. OCILIB est un driver Oracle open source et portable qui assure des accès performants et fiables aux bases de données Oracles. La librairie OCILIB : offre une API riche et simple à utiliser tourne sur toutes les plateformes Oracle est écrite en pur ISO C avec un support natif Unicode en ISO C encapsule OCI (Oracle Call interface) est le wrapper OCI le plus complet disponible Résumé de cette nouvelle version 3.6.0 : Citation:

    Read the article

  • HRESULT E_FAIL Exception! (5 replies)

    Hi, I am trying to generate a powerpoint presentation in C#. It works well on my local machine which is running XP. When I run the application on Windows Server 2003 (our Server) the presentation gives HRESULT E FAIL when I call the following code chart (Microsoft.Office.Interop.Graph.Chart)slide.Shapes.AddOLEObject (GetLeft(i), GetTop(i), GetWidth(i), GetHeight(i), &quot;MSGraph.Chart&quot;, &quot;&quot;, Microsoft....

    Read the article

  • SEO Or PPC? - Which is Better?

    In the field of Online Marketing, SEO, SEM, DEO whatever you want to call it, there are simply just too many fields to be playing in to simply say SEO or PPC. The question in itself is far too narrow.

    Read the article

  • Farm is unavailable exception

    - by H(at)Ni
    I was faced today by an exception saying that "Farm is unavailable" and the call stack which for sure wasn't useful for diagnosing that type of error. My solution to this error was straight forward and below are the steps that I've followed: 1. Open run and type services.msc 2. Search for the SQL server instance and in my case I've found that it's not running, so simply start it :) After that, refresh the page and everything is normal again !

    Read the article

  • Run your own XHTML validator

    - by TATWORTH
    Whilst the W3C do provide an excellent service for manually checking your web pages, there are times when an alternative is required. There is for example a web service at http://validator.w3.org/docs/api.html  This can be for programmatically checking your pages (provided you make no more than 1 call per second). The W3C do provide all the source code needed to run your own validation service. Get the full details at: ·         Installation and development information for the W3C Markup Validator   http://validator.w3.org/docs/devel.html ·         Source Availability http://validator.w3.org/source/

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378  | Next Page >