Search Results

Search found 62161 results on 2487 pages for 'set difference'.

Page 377/2487 | < Previous Page | 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384  | Next Page >

  • Nhibernate beginner - asking for directions

    - by George
    Hello guys. I'm starting off with NHibernate now and I still don't have a testable environment. I would like to know from you, experienced fellows if there is a problem to map IList to an Set in .hbm file. Like this: //c# IList<TrechoItem> trechos_item; <!-- xml .hbm --> <set name="TrechosItem" table="trecho_item" lazy="true" inverse="true" fetch="select"> <key column="id_item"/> <one-to-many class="TrechoItem"/> </set> Or, in this: IList<Autor> Autores; <set name="Autores" lazy="true" table="item_possui_autor"> <key column="id_item"/> <many-to-many class="Autor" column="id_autor"/> </set> Is this possible? Or am I doing the wrong thing? I tried using and but these did not gave me all the options in . Thanks in advanced

    Read the article

  • SharePoint: Make a list field hidden programmatically

    - by vitule
    I'm trying to hide the "Title" field in a list. This doesn't seem to work: SPList myList; ... SPField titleField = myList.Fields.GetField("Title"); //titleField.PushChangesToLists = true; <-- doesn't seem to make a difference titleField.ShowInEditForm = false; titleField.ShowInDisplayForm = false; titleField.ShowInNewForm = false; titleField.Update(); //myList.Update(); <-- make no difference What am I doing wrong?

    Read the article

  • DataGridView with row-specific DataGridViewComboBoxColumn contents

    - by XXXXX
    So I have something like the following data structure (constructors omitted) class Child { public string Name { get; set; } public int Age { get; set; } } class Parent { public string Name { get; set; } public List <Child> Children { get; private set; } // never null; list never empty public Child FavoriteChild { get; set; } // never null; always a reference to a Child in Children } List < Parent > Parents; What I want to do is show a DataGridView where each row is a Parent from Parent list. Each row should have two columns: a text box showing the parent's name and a DataGridViewComboBoxColumn containing that parent's children, from which the user can select the parent's favorite child. I suppose I could do the whole thing manually, but I'd like to do all this with more-or-less standard Data Binding. It's easy enough to bind the DataGridView to the list of parents, and easy enough to bind the selected child to the FavoriteChild property. The part that's giving me difficulty is that it looks like the Combo Box column wants to bind to one data source for all the combo-box's contents on all rows. I'd like each instance of the combo box to bind to the list of each parent's children. I'm fairly new to C#/Windows Forms, so I may well be missing something obvious. Or it could be that "you can't get there from here." It's not too tough to make a separate list of all the children and filter it by parent; I'm looking into that possibility right now. Is this feasible, or is there a better way?

    Read the article

  • asp:SqlDataSource binded to asp:DropDownList

    - by _simon_
    I have a asp:SqlDataSource and asp:DropDownList components on my page. On normal page it works ok. Now I'd like to put this on new page with url like ...mypage.aspx?transactionID=2. In Page_Load I would like to set Transaction drop down selected index to 2. But it always binds to 1. I assume, that things happen in this order: in Page_Load I set selected index to 2. Then asp:SqlDataSource's select statement executes and binds to DropDownList. That's why selected index of my DropDownList is always 1, no matter what I set it in Page_Load. So, how can I bind asp:SqlDataSource to asp:DropDownList and also set it's selected index parameter to some integer?

    Read the article

  • Using Excel VBA to Create SQL Tables

    - by user307655
    Hi All, I am trying to use Excel VBA to automate the creation of a SQL table in an existing SQL Database. I have come across the following code on this side. Private Sub CreateDatabaseFromExcel() Dim dbConnectStr As String Dim Catalog As Object Dim cnt As ADODB.Connection Dim dbPath As String Dim tblName As String 'Set database name in the Excel Sheet dbPath = ActiveSheet.Range("B1").Value 'Database Name tblName = ActiveSheet.Range("B2").Value 'Table Name dbConnectStr = "Provider=Microsoft.Jet.OLEDB.4.0;Data Source=" & dbPath & ";" 'Create new database using name entered in Excel Cell ("B1") Set Catalog = CreateObject("ADOX.Catalog") Catalog.Create dbConnectStr Set Catalog = Nothing 'Connect to database and insert a new table Set cnt = New ADODB.Connection With cnt .Open dbConnectStr .Execute "CREATE TABLE tblName ([BankName] text(50) WITH Compression, " & _ "[RTNumber] text(9) WITH Compression, " & _ "[AccountNumber] text(10) WITH Compression, " & _ "[Address] text(150) WITH Compression, " & _ "[City] text(50) WITH Compression, " & _ "[ProvinceState] text(2) WITH Compression, " & _ "[Postal] text(6) WITH Compression, " & _ "[AccountAmount] decimal(6))" End With Set cnt = Nothing End Sub However i can't successfully get it to work? What I am trying to do is actually use Excel to create a table not a database? The database already exists. I would just like to create a new table. The name of the table will be referenced from cell A1 in Sheet 1. Can somebody please help. Thanks Regards Gerard

    Read the article

  • jquery $(window).width() and $(window).height() return different values when viewport has not been r

    - by Manca Weeks
    I am writing a site using jquery that repeatedly repeatedly calls $(window).width() and $(window).height() to position and size elements based on the viewport size... In troubleshooting I discovered that I am getting slightly different viewport size reports in repeated calls to the above jquery functions when the viewport is not resized... Wondering if there is any special case anyone knows of when this happens, or if this is just the way it is. The difference in sizes reported are 20px or less, it appears. It happens in Safari 4.0.4, Firefox 3.6.2 and Chrome 5.0.342.7 beta on Mac OS X 10.6.2... I didn't test other browsers yet because it doesn't appear to be specific to the browser. I was also unable to figure out what the difference depends upon - if it isn't the viewport size, could there be another factor that makes the results differ? Any insight would be appreciated... Thanks MAnca

    Read the article

  • Asp.Net MVC - Binding of parameter to model value!

    - by Pino
    This seems like the model binding is causing me issues. Essentially I have a model called ProductOption and for the purpose of this question it has 2 fields ID (Int) PK ProductID (Int) FK I have a standard route set-up context.MapRoute( "Product_default", "Product/{controller}/{action}/{id}", new { controller = "Product", action = "Index", id = UrlParameter.Optional } ); and if the user wants to add an option the URL is, /Product/Options/Add/1 in the above URL 1 is the ProductID, I have the following code to return a blank model the the view, [HttpGet] public ActionResult Add(int id) { return View("Manage", new ProductOptionModel() { ProductID = id }); } Now in my view I keep a hidden field <%= Html.HiddenFor(x=>x.ID) %> This is used to determine (on submit) if we are editing or adding a new option. However the Model binder in .net seems to replace .ID (Which was 0 when leaving the above get actionresult) with 1 (or the value of the id parameter in the URL) How can I stop or work around this? ViewModel public class ProductExtraModel { //Database public int ID { get; set; } public string Name { get; set; } public int ProductID { get; set; } public ProductModel Product { get; set; } }

    Read the article

  • EF 4.0 Code only assocation from abstract to derived

    - by Jeroen
    Using EF 4.0 Code only i want to make an assocation between an abstract and normal class. I have class 'Item', 'ContentBase' and 'Test'. 'ContentBase' is abstract and 'Test' derives from it. 'ContentBase' has a property 'Item' that links to an instance of 'Item'. So that 'Test.Item' or any class that derives from 'ContentBase' has an 'Item' navigation property. In my DB every record for Test has a matching record for Item. public class Item { public int Id { get; set;} } public abstract class ContentBase { public int ContentId { get; set;} public int Id { get; set;} public Item Item { get; set;} } public class Test : ContentBase { public string Name { get; set;} } now some init code public void SomeInitFunction() { var itemConfig = new EntityConfiguration<Item>(); itemConfig.HasKey(p => p.Id); itemConfig.Property(p => p.Id).IsIdentity(); this.ContextBuilder.Configurations.Add(itemConfig); var testConfig = new EntityConfiguration<Test>(); testConfig.HasKey(p => p.ContentId); testConfig.Property(p => p.ContentId).IsIdentity(); // the problem testConfig.Relationship(p => p.Item).HasConstraint((p, q) => p.Id == q.Id); this.ContextBuilder.Configurations.Add(testConfig); } This gives an error: A key is registered for the derived type 'Test'. Keys must be registered for the root type 'ContentBase'. anyway i try i get an error. What am i a doing wrong?

    Read the article

  • Trying to import SQL file in a xampp server returns error

    - by Victor_J_Martin
    I have done a ER diagram in Mysql Workbench, and I am trying load in my server with phpMyAdmin, but it returns me the next error: Error SQL Query: -- ----------------------------------------------------- -- Table `BDA`.`UG` -- ----------------------------------------------------- CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `BDA`.`UG` ( `numero_ug` INT NOT NULL, `nombre` VARCHAR(45) NOT NULL, `segunda_firma_autorizada` VARCHAR(45) NOT NULL, `fecha_creacion` DATE NOT NULL, `nombre_depto` VARCHAR(140) NOT NULL, `dni` INT NOT NULL, `anho_contable` INT NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`numero_ug`), INDEX `nombre_depto_idx` (`nombre_depto` ASC), INDEX `dni_idx` (`dni` ASC), INDEX `anho_contable_idx` (`anho_contable` ASC), CONSTRAINT `nombre_depto` FOREIGN KEY (`nombre_depto`) REFERENCES `BDA`.`Departamento` (`nombre_depto`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION, CONSTRAINT `dni` FOREIGN KEY (`dni`) REFERENCES `BDA`.`Trabajador` (`dni`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION, CONSTRAINT `anho_contable` FOREIGN KEY (`anho_contable`) REFERENCES `BDA`.`Capitulo_Contable` (`anho_contable`) [...] MySQL said: Documentation #1022 - Can't write; duplicate key in table 'ug' I export the result of the diagram from Mysql Workbench to a SQL file, and this file is what I'm trying to upload. This is the file. I can not find the duplicate key. SET @OLD_UNIQUE_CHECKS=@@UNIQUE_CHECKS, UNIQUE_CHECKS=0; SET @OLD_FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS=@@FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS, FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS=0; SET @OLD_SQL_MODE=@@SQL_MODE, SQL_MODE='TRADITIONAL,ALLOW_INVALID_DATES'; CREATE SCHEMA IF NOT EXISTS `BDA` DEFAULT CHARACTER SET utf8 COLLATE utf8_general_ci ; USE `BDA` ; -- ----------------------------------------------------- -- Table `BDA`.`Departamento` -- ----------------------------------------------------- CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `BDA`.`Departamento` ( `nombre_depto` VARCHAR(140) NOT NULL, `area_depto` VARCHAR(140) NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`nombre_depto`)) ENGINE = InnoDB; -- ----------------------------------------------------- -- Table `BDA`.`Trabajador` -- ----------------------------------------------------- CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `BDA`.`Trabajador` ( `dni` INT NOT NULL, `direccion` VARCHAR(140) NOT NULL, `nombre` VARCHAR(45) NOT NULL, `apellidos` VARCHAR(140) NOT NULL, `fecha_nacimiento` DATE NOT NULL, `fecha_contrato` DATE NOT NULL, `titulacion` VARCHAR(140) NULL, `nombre_depto` VARCHAR(45) NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`dni`), INDEX `nombre_depto_idx` (`nombre_depto` ASC), CONSTRAINT `nombre_depto` FOREIGN KEY (`nombre_depto`) REFERENCES `BDA`.`Departamento` (`nombre_depto`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION) ENGINE = InnoDB; -- ----------------------------------------------------- -- Table `BDA`.`Capitulo_Contable` -- ----------------------------------------------------- CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `BDA`.`Capitulo_Contable` ( `anho_contable` INT NOT NULL, `numero_ug` INT NOT NULL, `debe` DOUBLE NOT NULL, `haber` DOUBLE NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`anho_contable`), INDEX `numero_ug_idx` (`numero_ug` ASC), CONSTRAINT `numero_ug` FOREIGN KEY (`numero_ug`) REFERENCES `BDA`.`UG` (`numero_ug`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION) ENGINE = InnoDB; -- ----------------------------------------------------- -- Table `BDA`.`UG` -- ----------------------------------------------------- CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `BDA`.`UG` ( `numero_ug` INT NOT NULL, `nombre` VARCHAR(45) NOT NULL, `segunda_firma_autorizada` VARCHAR(45) NOT NULL, `fecha_creacion` DATE NOT NULL, `nombre_depto` VARCHAR(140) NOT NULL, `dni` INT NOT NULL, `anho_contable` INT NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`numero_ug`), INDEX `nombre_depto_idx` (`nombre_depto` ASC), INDEX `dni_idx` (`dni` ASC), INDEX `anho_contable_idx` (`anho_contable` ASC), CONSTRAINT `nombre_depto` FOREIGN KEY (`nombre_depto`) REFERENCES `BDA`.`Departamento` (`nombre_depto`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION, CONSTRAINT `dni` FOREIGN KEY (`dni`) REFERENCES `BDA`.`Trabajador` (`dni`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION, CONSTRAINT `anho_contable` FOREIGN KEY (`anho_contable`) REFERENCES `BDA`.`Capitulo_Contable` (`anho_contable`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION) ENGINE = InnoDB; -- ----------------------------------------------------- -- Table `BDA`.`Cliente` -- ----------------------------------------------------- CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `BDA`.`Cliente` ( `cif_cliente` INT NOT NULL, `nombre_cliente` VARCHAR(140) NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`cif_cliente`)) ENGINE = InnoDB; -- ----------------------------------------------------- -- Table `BDA`.`Ingreso` -- ----------------------------------------------------- CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `BDA`.`Ingreso` ( `id` INT NOT NULL, `concepto` VARCHAR(45) NOT NULL, `importe` DOUBLE NOT NULL, `fecha` DATE NOT NULL, `cif_cliente` INT NOT NULL, `numero_ug` INT NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`id`), INDEX `cif_cliente_idx` (`cif_cliente` ASC), INDEX `numero_ug_idx` (`numero_ug` ASC), CONSTRAINT `cif_cliente` FOREIGN KEY (`cif_cliente`) REFERENCES `BDA`.`Cliente` (`cif_cliente`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION, CONSTRAINT `numero_ug` FOREIGN KEY (`numero_ug`) REFERENCES `BDA`.`UG` (`numero_ug`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION) ENGINE = InnoDB; -- ----------------------------------------------------- -- Table `BDA`.`Proveedor` -- ----------------------------------------------------- CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `BDA`.`Proveedor` ( `cif_proveedor` INT NOT NULL, `nombre_proveedor` VARCHAR(140) NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`cif_proveedor`)) ENGINE = InnoDB; -- ----------------------------------------------------- -- Table `BDA`.`Gasto` -- ----------------------------------------------------- CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `BDA`.`Gasto` ( `id` INT NOT NULL, `concepto` VARCHAR(45) NOT NULL, `importe` DOUBLE NOT NULL, `fecha` DATE NOT NULL, `factura` INT NOT NULL, `cif_proveedor` INT NOT NULL, `numero_ug` INT NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`id`), INDEX `cif_proveedor_idx` (`cif_proveedor` ASC), INDEX `numero_ug_idx` (`numero_ug` ASC), CONSTRAINT `cif_proveedor` FOREIGN KEY (`cif_proveedor`) REFERENCES `BDA`.`Proveedor` (`cif_proveedor`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION, CONSTRAINT `numero_ug` FOREIGN KEY (`numero_ug`) REFERENCES `BDA`.`UG` (`numero_ug`) ON DELETE NO ACTION ON UPDATE NO ACTION) ENGINE = InnoDB; SET SQL_MODE=@OLD_SQL_MODE; SET FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS=@OLD_FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS; SET UNIQUE_CHECKS=@OLD_UNIQUE_CHECKS; Thanks for your advices.

    Read the article

  • Combining two UPDATE Commands - Performance ?

    - by Johannes
    If I want to update two rows in a MySQL table, using the following two command: UPDATE table SET Col = Value1 WHERE ID = ID1 UPDATE table SET Col = Value2 WHERE ID = ID2` I usually combine them into one command, so that I do not to have to contact the MySQL server twice from my C client: UPDATE table SET Col = IF( ID = ID1 , Value1 , Value2) WHERE ID=ID1 OR ID=ID2 Is this really a performance gain? Background Information: I am using a custom made fully C written high-performance heavily loaded webserver.

    Read the article

  • NHibernate / Fluent - Mapping multiple objects to single lookup table

    - by Al
    Hi all I am struggling a little in getting my mapping right. What I have is a single self joined table of look up values of certain types. Each lookup can have a parent, which can be of a different type. For simplicities sake lets take the Country and State example. So the lookup table would look like this: Lookups Id Key Value LookupType ParentId - self joining to Id base class public class Lookup : BaseEntity { public Lookup() {} public Lookup(string key, string value) { Key = key; Value = value; } public virtual Lookup Parent { get; set; } [DomainSignature] [NotNullNotEmpty] public virtual LookupType LookupType { get; set; } [NotNullNotEmpty] public virtual string Key { get; set; } [NotNullNotEmpty] public virtual string Value { get; set; } } The lookup map public class LookupMap : IAutoMappingOverride<DBLookup> { public void Override(AutoMapping<Lookup> map) { map.Table("Lookups"); map.References(x => x.Parent, "ParentId").ForeignKey("Id"); map.DiscriminateSubClassesOnColumn<string>("LookupType").CustomType(typeof(LookupType)); } } BASE SubClass map for subclasses public class BaseLookupMap : SubclassMap where T : DBLookup { protected BaseLookupMap() { } protected BaseLookupMap(LookupType lookupType) { DiscriminatorValue(lookupType); Table("Lookups"); } } Example subclass map public class StateMap : BaseLookupMap<State> { protected StateMap() : base(LookupType.State) { } } Now I've almost got my mappings set, however the mapping is still expecting a table-per-class setup, so is expecting a 'State' table to exist with a reference to the states Id in the Lookup table. I hope this makes sense. This doesn't seem like an uncommon approach when wanting to keep lookup-type values configurable. Thanks in advance. Al

    Read the article

  • Flex: CursorManager does nothing when `stage.mouseChildren = false`?

    - by David Wolever
    I've found that if I use the CursorManager to set a cursor — CursorManager.setBusyCursor() — then set stage.mouseChildren = false, the cursor set by CursorManager is replaced by the "default" mouse cursor the next time the mouse is moved. I'm setting stage.mouseChildren = false so that, while the mouse is being dragged, other "stuff" on the stage won't get mouse events (eg, so that mouse-over affordances aren't triggered if I'm in the middle of a drag). Is there some way I can work around this?

    Read the article

  • Performance issues with repeatable loops as control part

    - by djerry
    Hey guys, In my application, i need to show made calls to the user. The user can arrange some filters, according to what they want to see. The problem is that i find it quite hard to filter the calls without losing performance. This is what i am using now : private void ProcessFilterChoice() { _filteredCalls = ServiceConnector.ServiceConnector.SingletonServiceConnector.Proxy.GetAllCalls().ToList(); if (cboOutgoingIncoming.SelectedIndex > -1) GetFilterPartOutgoingIncoming(); if (cboInternExtern.SelectedIndex > -1) GetFilterPartInternExtern(); if (cboDateFilter.SelectedIndex > -1) GetFilteredCallsByDate(); wbPdf.Source = null; btnPrint.Content = "Pdf preview"; } private void GetFilterPartOutgoingIncoming() { if (cboOutgoingIncoming.SelectedItem.ToString().Equals("Outgoing")) for (int i = _filteredCalls.Count - 1; i > -1; i--) { if (_filteredCalls[i].Caller.E164.Length > 4 || _filteredCalls[i].Caller.E164.Equals("0")) _filteredCalls.RemoveAt(i); } else if (cboOutgoingIncoming.SelectedItem.ToString().Equals("Incoming")) for (int i = _filteredCalls.Count - 1; i > -1; i--) { if (_filteredCalls[i].Called.E164.Length > 4 || _filteredCalls[i].Called.E164.Equals("0")) _filteredCalls.RemoveAt(i); } } private void GetFilterPartInternExtern() { if (cboInternExtern.SelectedItem.ToString().Equals("Intern")) for (int i = _filteredCalls.Count - 1; i > -1; i--) { if (_filteredCalls[i].Called.E164.Length > 4 || _filteredCalls[i].Caller.E164.Length > 4 || _filteredCalls[i].Caller.E164.Equals("0")) _filteredCalls.RemoveAt(i); } else if (cboInternExtern.SelectedItem.ToString().Equals("Extern")) for (int i = _filteredCalls.Count - 1; i > -1; i--) { if ((_filteredCalls[i].Called.E164.Length < 5 && _filteredCalls[i].Caller.E164.Length < 5) || _filteredCalls[i].Called.E164.Equals("0")) _filteredCalls.RemoveAt(i); } } private void GetFilteredCallsByDate() { DateTime period = DateTime.Now; switch (cboDateFilter.SelectedItem.ToString()) { case "Today": period = DateTime.Today; break; case "Last week": period = DateTime.Today.Subtract(new TimeSpan(7, 0, 0, 0)); break; case "Last month": period = DateTime.Today.AddMonths(-1); break; case "Last year": period = DateTime.Today.AddYears(-1); break; default: return; } for (int i = _filteredCalls.Count - 1; i > -1; i--) { if (_filteredCalls[i].Start < period) _filteredCalls.RemoveAt(i); } } _filtered calls is a list of "calls". Calls is a class that looks like this : [DataContract] public class Call { private User caller, called; private DateTime start, end; private string conferenceId; private int id; private bool isNew = false; [DataMember] public bool IsNew { get { return isNew; } set { isNew = value; } } [DataMember] public int Id { get { return id; } set { id = value; } } [DataMember] public string ConferenceId { get { return conferenceId; } set { conferenceId = value; } } [DataMember] public DateTime End { get { return end; } set { end = value; } } [DataMember] public DateTime Start { get { return start; } set { start = value; } } [DataMember] public User Called { get { return called; } set { called = value; } } [DataMember] public User Caller { get { return caller; } set { caller = value; } } Can anyone direct me to a better solution or make some suggestions.

    Read the article

  • Doing arithmetic with up to two decimal places in Python?

    - by user248237
    I have two floats in Python that I'd like to subtract, i.e. v1 = float(value1) v2 = float(value2) diff = v1 - v2 I want "diff" to be computed up to two decimal places, that is compute it using %.2f of v1 and %.2f of v2. How can I do this? I know how to print v1 and v2 up to two decimals, but not how to do arithmetic like that. The particular issue I am trying to avoid is this. Suppose that: v1 = 0.982769777778 v2 = 0.985980444444 diff = v1 - v2 and then I print to file the following: myfile.write("%.2f\t%.2f\t%.2f\n" %(v1, v2, diff)) then I will get the output: 0.98 0.99 0.00, suggesting that there's no difference between v1 and v2, even though the printed result suggests there's a 0.01 difference. How can I get around this? thanks.

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET Granting access to local resources

    - by Mina Samy
    Hi all I have an ASP.NET web application that runs on a windows server 2003 server. there is a form that reads and writes data to an xml file inside the application's directory. I always grant the NETWORK SERVICE user full control on my application folder so that it can read and write to the xml file. I put the application on another windows server 2003 server and did the same steps above but i was getting an Access denied exception on the form that reads and writes to the xml. I did some search and found that if you grant the user ASPNET full control to the directory it would work, I did that and it worked fine. my question is: what is the difference between granting full control permissions to NETWORK SERVICE and ASPNET users ? and what can be the difference between the two servers that caused this issue ? thanks

    Read the article

  • Fluent many-to-many: Deleting one end does not remove the entry in the relation table

    - by Kristoffer
    I have two classes (Parent, Child) that have a many-to-many relationship that only one end (Parent) knows about. My problem is that when I delete a "relation unaware" object (Child), the record in the many-to-many table is left. I want the relationship to be removed regardless of which end of it is deleted. How can I do that with Fluent NHibernate mappings, without adding a Parent property on Child? The classes: public class Parent { public Guid Id { get; set; } public IList<Child> Children { get; set; } } public class Child { public Guid Id { get; set; } // Don't want the property below: // public Parent Parent { get; set; } }

    Read the article

  • finding subfolder of a folder getting by getFolder method in asp

    - by Abhisheks.net
    hello guys, i am troubling from this problem , i want to find the list of folder but there is some problem , i have a support folder in root directory, first i have the subfolder of this "Support" folder then in each folder i have to find a specific say "x" folder and then in this x folder i want to check each file and folder. i am sending here code . please help me .... dim fs, fso, fo, s, x, f, filePath, a, sfPath set fs=Server.CreateObject("Scripting.FileSystemObject") set fo=fs.GetFolder(Server.MapPath("support/")) a = Split(pSku,"-",-1) for each x in fo.SubFolders sfPath= "support/" + x.Name + "/" + a(0) + "/" 'a(0) contains a folder name set s = fs.GetFolder(server.MapPath(sfPath)) set s = nothing next Please tell me solution ..

    Read the article

  • need to change TextBox.Text inside TextChanged, something forces form close

    - by Istrebitel
    I am making a TextBox behave like if it could store a null value. In order to do that, i have a variable NullMode that indicates wether the value is stored is Null, and in TextChanged i set that to false, and on specific user action i set it to true and Text to a value that indicates that there is null inside the textbox. Then, based on NullMode, textbox is drawn differently. Now, i have a semaphore-like approach in order to prevent event handle from firing when i dont need it. Here is how it looks: private void input_TextChanged(object sender, EventArgs e) { if (_preventTextBoxEvents) return; _preventTextBoxEvents = true; //if (NullMode) // Text = ""; NullMode = false; ValidateInput(); _preventTextBoxEvents = false; } Now, if i need to set a textbox text to something that should show while in nullmode, i just set _preventTextBoxEvents before i do to true and it works all right. BUT! I need to also remove the text when user tries to input something into the textbox! So i need to set Text to "". Problem is, if i uncomment that, form is closed after the event handler exits. I cannot prevent it (e.Cancel = true in FormClosing doesnt help!) and do not understand what can be causing it. There is no error message too (and i'm not doing try-catch). My logic, when i do Text="". OnTextChanged should fire, it should call my TextChanged and it will see _preventTextBoxEvents is true and exit, so there would be no stack overflow / infinite recursion. What is going on?

    Read the article

  • SQl Server: serializable level not working

    - by Zé Carlos
    I have the following SP: CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[sp_LockReader] AS BEGIN SET NOCOUNT ON; begin try set transaction isolation level serializable begin tran select * from teste commit tran end try begin catch rollback tran set transaction isolation level READ COMMITTED end catch set transaction isolation level READ COMMITTED END The table "test" has many values, so "select * from teste" takes several seconds. I run the sp_LockReader at same time in two diferent query windows and the second one starts showing test table contents without the first one terminates. Shouldn't serializeble level forces the second query to wait? How do i get the described behaviour? Thanks

    Read the article

  • sort arrow is always showing up once sorting is used

    - by kksachin
    we have several pages as tabs where datatable is used in most of the pages.when we sort on a particular coulmn and exit the page and re enter this page the arrow appears(up /down based on how we left) Although the data is not sorted in the direction the arrow shows.i have set preserveSort and preserveDataMode to false. The arrow is set to true in the column's t:commandSortHeader tag in all the pages. is this a bug or am i missing any setting?I have tried to set forceId to false in t:commandSortHeader but of now use.

    Read the article

  • Adding defaults and indexes to a script/generate command in a Rails Template?

    - by charliepark
    I'm trying to set up a Rails Template that would allow for comprehensive set-up of a specific Rails app. Using Pratik Naik's overview (http://m.onkey.org/2008/12/4/rails-templates), I was able to set up a couple of scaffolds and models, with a line that looks something like this ... generate("scaffold", "post", "title:string", "body:string") I'm now trying to add in Delayed Jobs, which normally has a migration file that looks like this: create_table :delayed_jobs, :force => true do |table| table.integer :priority, :default => 0 # Allows some jobs to jump to the front of the queue table.integer :attempts, :default => 0 # Provides for retries, but still fail eventually. table.text :handler # YAML-encoded string of the object that will do work table.text :last_error # reason for last failure (See Note below) table.datetime :run_at # When to run. Could be Time.now for immediately, or sometime in the future. table.datetime :locked_at # Set when a client is working on this object table.datetime :failed_at # Set when all retries have failed (actually, by default, the record is deleted instead) table.string :locked_by # Who is working on this object (if locked) table.timestamps end So, what I'm trying to do with the Rails template, is to add in that :default = 0 into the master template file. I know that the rest of the template's command should look like this: generate("migration", "createDelayedJobs", "priority:integer", "attempts:integer", "handler:text", "last_error:text", "run_at:datetime", "locked_at:datetime", "failed_at:datetime", "locked_by:string") Where would I put (or, rather, what is the syntax to add) the :default values in that? And if I wanted to add an index, what's the best way to do that?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384  | Next Page >