Search Results

Search found 5516 results on 221 pages for 'scope identity'.

Page 38/221 | < Previous Page | 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45  | Next Page >

  • ???????????????:????????????

    - by ???02
    ???????????????:??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????ID?????????????Oracle Identity Manager????????????????????Oracle Database Vault???????·?????Oracle Audit Vault????????????????·????????????????????????????????????????????·?????????·?????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????(????????????????????)???·????????????????????? ???????????????????????????·???????????????????????????????????Oracle Database Vault ~???????????Oracle Database Vault??????????????????????????????(DBA)??????·?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Oracle Database Vault ~???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????IP????????????????????????????????????????????9:00-17:00?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Oracle Audit Vault ~???????????????????????????????????????·??????????·DBA???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Oracle Audit Vault???Oracle Audit Vault??Oracle Database Vault???????????????????????????????????ID????????????????????????ID????????????????????????????????????????????Oracle Database Standard Edition?Oracle Database Standard Edition One??????????????????Oracle Database Vault???????????Unix?Linux???OS???????????????????????Oracle Database(EE / SE / SE One)??????????????OS??????????????Oracle Identity Manager(???OIM)??????OIM??????????????????????????????ID???????????????ID???·?????????????????ID?????????????????ID????????????????·???????????Oracle Identity Manager ~ID??·????·??????OIM????????????????????(???/???????????)??????????????????????????ID??·? ???·?????????????????????????????????????ID????????????????????????????? ????Oracle Identity Manager ~??·????????????????????ID???????????????????????????????????????OIM?????????????????????????????????????Oracle Identity Manager ~??·??????????????????????1?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Oracle Identity Manager ~????????????????????OIM??ID????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??40???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ????????????????????PDF?Office??????????????????????????? Oracle Direct

    Read the article

  • Can you add identity to existing column in sql server 2008?

    - by bmutch
    In all my searching I see that you essentially have to copy the existing table to a new table to chance to identity column for pre-2008, does this apply to 2008 also? thanks. most concise solution I have found so far: CREATE TABLE Test ( id int identity(1,1), somecolumn varchar(10) ); INSERT INTO Test VALUES ('Hello'); INSERT INTO Test VALUES ('World'); -- copy the table. use same schema, but no identity CREATE TABLE Test2 ( id int NOT NULL, somecolumn varchar(10) ); ALTER TABLE Test SWITCH TO Test2; -- drop the original (now empty) table DROP TABLE Test; -- rename new table to old table's name EXEC sp_rename 'Test2','Test'; -- see same records SELECT * FROM Test;

    Read the article

  • How do I identify an OpenID provider as requiring Directed Identity?

    - by Skrat
    I am trying to extend the LightOpenID PHP library to "discover" that an identity provider requires Directed Identity. This should be easy as the library is beautifully well written and wonderfully clean but I don't know how to identify these types of providers. A couple things I've tried: I looked through the OpenID specs on the subject but came up empty handed. Looked through the PHP OpenID library but couldn't figure out how this info was gathered during the discovery. Dumped all the data (headers and content) that came from the servers by injecting some code in LightOpenID but didn't see anything helpful. Searched Google and Stackoverflow, naturally. How do providers identify themselves as requiring "Directed Identity" authentication? Surely there is a carefully defined specification for this... somewhere. Anyone know where I can find more on this?

    Read the article

  • How to have type hinting in PHP that specifies variable scope inside of a template? (specifically PhpStorm)

    - by Lance Rushing
    I'm looking for a doc comment that would define the scope/context of the current php template. (similar to @var) Example View Class: <?php class ExampleView { protected $pageTitle; public function __construct($title) { $this->pageTitle = $title; } public function render() { require_once 'template.php'; } } -- <?php // template.php /** @var $this ExampleView */ echo $this->pageTitle; PHPStorm gives an inspection error because the access on $pageTitle is protected. Is there a hint to give scope? Something like: <?php // template.php /** @scope ExampleView */ // <---???? /** @var $this ExampleView */ echo $this->pageTitle;

    Read the article

  • How to configure a Custom Datacontract Serializer or XMLSerializer

    - by user364445
    Im haveing some xml that have this structure <Person Id="*****" Name="*****"> <AccessControlEntries> <AccessControlEntry Id="*****" Name="****"/> </AccessControlEntries> <AccessControls /> <IdentityGroups> <IdentityGroup Id="****" Name="*****" /> </IdentityGroups></Person> and i also have this entities [DataContract(IsReference = true)] public abstract class EntityBase { protected bool serializing; [DataMember(Order = 1)] [XmlAttribute()] public string Id { get; set; } [DataMember(Order = 2)] [XmlAttribute()] public string Name { get; set; } [OnDeserializing()] public void OnDeserializing(StreamingContext context) { this.Initialize(); } [OnSerializing()] public void OnSerializing(StreamingContext context) { this.serializing = true; } [OnSerialized()] public void OnSerialized(StreamingContext context) { this.serializing = false; } public abstract void Initialize(); public string ToXml() { var settings = new System.Xml.XmlWriterSettings(); settings.Indent = true; settings.OmitXmlDeclaration = true; var sb = new System.Text.StringBuilder(); using (var writer = System.Xml.XmlWriter.Create(sb, settings)) { var serializer = new XmlSerializer(this.GetType()); serializer.Serialize(writer, this); } return sb.ToString(); } } [DataContract()] public abstract class Identity : EntityBase { private EntitySet<AccessControlEntry> accessControlEntries; private EntitySet<IdentityGroup> identityGroups; public Identity() { Initialize(); } [DataMember(Order = 3, EmitDefaultValue = false)] [Association(Name = "AccessControlEntries")] public EntitySet<AccessControlEntry> AccessControlEntries { get { if ((this.serializing && (this.accessControlEntries==null || this.accessControlEntries.HasLoadedOrAssignedValues == false))) { return null; } return accessControlEntries; } set { accessControlEntries.Assign(value); } } [DataMember(Order = 4, EmitDefaultValue = false)] [Association(Name = "IdentityGroups")] public EntitySet<IdentityGroup> IdentityGroups { get { if ((this.serializing && (this.identityGroups == null || this.identityGroups.HasLoadedOrAssignedValues == false))) { return null; } return identityGroups; } set { identityGroups.Assign(value); } } private void attach_accessControlEntry(AccessControlEntry entity) { entity.Identities.Add(this); } private void dettach_accessControlEntry(AccessControlEntry entity) { entity.Identities.Remove(this); } private void attach_IdentityGroup(IdentityGroup entity) { entity.MemberIdentites.Add(this); } private void dettach_IdentityGroup(IdentityGroup entity) { entity.MemberIdentites.Add(this); } public override void Initialize() { this.accessControlEntries = new EntitySet<AccessControlEntry>( new Action<AccessControlEntry>(this.attach_accessControlEntry), new Action<AccessControlEntry>(this.dettach_accessControlEntry)); this.identityGroups = new EntitySet<IdentityGroup>( new Action<IdentityGroup>(this.attach_IdentityGroup), new Action<IdentityGroup>(this.dettach_IdentityGroup)); } } [XmlType(TypeName = "AccessControlEntry")] public class AccessControlEntry : EntityBase, INotifyPropertyChanged { private EntitySet<Service> services; private EntitySet<Identity> identities; private EntitySet<Permission> permissions; public AccessControlEntry() { services = new EntitySet<Service>(new Action<Service>(attach_Service), new Action<Service>(dettach_Service)); identities = new EntitySet<Identity>(new Action<Identity>(attach_Identity), new Action<Identity>(dettach_Identity)); permissions = new EntitySet<Permission>(new Action<Permission>(attach_Permission), new Action<Permission>(dettach_Permission)); } [DataMember(Order = 3, EmitDefaultValue = false)] public EntitySet<Permission> Permissions { get { if ((this.serializing && (this.permissions.HasLoadedOrAssignedValues == false))) { return null; } return permissions; } set { permissions.Assign(value); } } [DataMember(Order = 4, EmitDefaultValue = false)] public EntitySet<Identity> Identities { get { if ((this.serializing && (this.identities.HasLoadedOrAssignedValues == false))) { return null; } return identities; } set { identities.Assign(identities); } } [DataMember(Order = 5, EmitDefaultValue = false)] public EntitySet<Service> Services { get { if ((this.serializing && (this.services.HasLoadedOrAssignedValues == false))) { return null; } return services; } set { services.Assign(value); } } private void attach_Permission(Permission entity) { entity.AccessControlEntires.Add(this); } private void dettach_Permission(Permission entity) { entity.AccessControlEntires.Remove(this); } private void attach_Identity(Identity entity) { entity.AccessControlEntries.Add(this); } private void dettach_Identity(Identity entity) { entity.AccessControlEntries.Remove(this); } private void attach_Service(Service entity) { entity.AccessControlEntries.Add(this); } private void dettach_Service(Service entity) { entity.AccessControlEntries.Remove(this); } #region INotifyPropertyChanged Members public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged; protected void OnPropertyChanged(string name) { PropertyChangedEventHandler handler = PropertyChanged; if (handler != null) handler(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(name)); } #endregion public override void Initialize() { throw new NotImplementedException(); } } [DataContract()] [XmlType(TypeName = "Person")] public class Person : Identity { private EntityRef<Login> login; [DataMember(Order = 3)] [XmlAttribute()] public string Nombre { get; set; } [DataMember(Order = 4)] [XmlAttribute()] public string Apellidos { get; set; } [DataMember(Order = 5)] public Login Login { get { return login.Entity; } set { var previousValue = this.login.Entity; if (((previousValue != value) || (this.login.HasLoadedOrAssignedValue == false))) { if ((previousValue != null)) { this.login.Entity = null; previousValue.Person = null; } this.login.Entity = value; if ((value != null)) value.Person = this; } } } public override void Initialize() { base.Initialize(); } } [DataContract()] [XmlType(TypeName = "Login")] public class Login : EntityBase { private EntityRef<Person> person; [DataMember(Order = 3)] public string UserID { get; set; } [DataMember(Order = 4)] public string Contrasena { get; set; } [DataMember(Order = 5)] public Domain Dominio { get; set; } public Person Person { get { return person.Entity; } set { var previousValue = this.person.Entity; if (((previousValue != value) || (this.person.HasLoadedOrAssignedValue == false))) { if ((previousValue != null)) { this.person.Entity = null; previousValue.Login = null; } this.person.Entity = value; if ((value != null)) value.Login = this; } } } public override void Initialize() { throw new NotImplementedException(); } } [DataContract()] [XmlType(TypeName = "IdentityGroup")] public class IdentityGroup : Identity { private EntitySet<Identity> memberIdentities; public IdentityGroup() { Initialize(); } public override void Initialize() { this.memberIdentities = new EntitySet<Identity>(new Action<Identity>(this.attach_Identity), new Action<Identity>(this.dettach_Identity)); } [DataMember(Order = 3, EmitDefaultValue = false)] [Association(Name = "MemberIdentities")] public EntitySet<Identity> MemberIdentites { get { if ((this.serializing && (this.memberIdentities.HasLoadedOrAssignedValues == false))) { return null; } return memberIdentities; } set { memberIdentities.Assign(value); } } private void attach_Identity(Identity entity) { entity.IdentityGroups.Add(this); } private void dettach_Identity(Identity entity) { entity.IdentityGroups.Remove(this); } } [DataContract()] [XmlType(TypeName = "Group")] public class Group : Identity { public override void Initialize() { throw new NotImplementedException(); } } but the ToXml() response something like this <Person xmlns:xsi="************" xmlns:xsd="******" ID="******" Name="*****"/><AccessControlEntries/></Person> but what i want is something like this <Person Id="****" Name="***" Nombre="****"> <AccessControlEntries/> <IdentityGroups/> </Person>

    Read the article

  • Conflicting ip routes with local table on attaching a virtual network interface

    - by user1071840
    I have an EC2 instance with these ip rules: $ sudo ip rule show 0: from all lookup local 32766: from all lookup main 32767: from all lookup default I can attach an elastic network interface to it with a private IP. Say the IP of my machine is 10.1.3.12 and the IP of the interface is 10.1.1.190. As soon as I attach the interface to my machine a new entry is added to the routing policy and local routing table: sudo ip rule show 0: from all lookup local 32765: from 10.1.1.190 lookup 10003 32766: from all lookup main 32767: from all lookup default $ sudo ip route show table local broadcast 10.1.1.0 dev eth3 proto kernel scope link src 10.1.1.190 local 10.1.1.190 dev eth3 proto kernel scope host src 10.1.1.190 broadcast 10.1.1.255 dev eth3 proto kernel scope link src 10.1.1.190 broadcast 10.1.3.0 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 10.1.3.12 local 10.1.3.12 dev eth0 proto kernel scope host src 10.1.3.12 broadcast 10.1.3.255 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 10.1.3.12 broadcast 127.0.0.0 dev lo proto kernel scope link src 127.0.0.1 local 127.0.0.0/8 dev lo proto kernel scope host src 127.0.0.1 local 127.0.0.1 dev lo proto kernel scope host src 127.0.0.1 broadcast 127.255.255.255 dev lo proto kernel scope link src 127.0.0.1 I can send traffic to this ENI directly from a host that can have the same IP as the host the ENI is attached to. This is where the problem starts. I ran tcpdump on the port in question and saw multiple SYNs going to the ENI with src '10.1.3.12' and destination '10.1.1.190' but didn't see even a single ACK. In my understanding if ACKs were being sent from the ENI they'd have destination as 10.1.3.12 i.e. the same as the local machine's IP and such packets will now be routed as local packets matching local routing policy: local 10.1.3.12 dev eth0 proto kernel scope host src 10.1.3.12 I'd like to send all the packets originating from 10.1.1.190 (my ENI) to go back on the same interface i.e. eth3 in this case. Contents of the nee table 10003 are: $ sudo ip route show table 10003 default via 10.1.1.1 dev eth3 I think I can do the following: I don't know if its possible but probably decrease the priority of local table so the packets match the table 10003. Use iptables to mangle these packets and update the local table route to include the mark information But I'm not sure if these are the right approaches.

    Read the article

  • Active and Passive Federation in WIF

    - by user102533
    I am trying to understand the difference between Active and Passive federation in WIF. It appears that one would use an Active Federation if the Relying Party (RP) is a WCF Service instead of an ASP.NET application and a Passive Federation if the RP is an ASP.NET application. Is this accurate? So, in a scenario in which an ASP.NET application uses a WCF in the backend, the MS articles suggest using a 'bootstrap' security token that is obtained by the ASP.NET app using an ActAs STS and this token is used to authenticate with the WCF. In this scenario, it appears that we are doing a combination of Active (user - STS - ASP.NET RP) and Passive (ASP.NET - ActAs STS - WCF) Federation?

    Read the article

  • Difference between Claims vs OAuth

    - by Venki
    What is the difference between Claims based authentication vs What is provided by OAuth. I am looking for conceptual difference and not technical difference. When do I choose Claims over OAuth and vice versa. Claims based authentication is proposed by Microsoft and build on top of WS-Security. But OAuth is more a open source protocol that is being proposed to allow fetching resources from different portals based on a security token. Claims also has this concept of token (SAML encoded or X509 certificates). I am trying to understand when do I choose Claims over OAuth and vice versa. Thanks

    Read the article

  • Invoking a WCF service using claims based authentication

    - by ashwnacharya
    I have a WCF service deployed in a server machine. We are using claims based authentication to authenticate the WCF service caller. The WCF service is restricted by using IIS Authorization rules. How do I programmatically invoke the WCF service using .NET? The client app uses a proxy generated using SVCUtil. calling the service reads the credentials from a configuration file (not the app.config file, in fact the client application does not have a *.config file).

    Read the article

  • Registry ReadString method is not working in Windows 7 in Delphi 7

    - by Tofig Hasanov
    The following code sample used to return me windows id before, but now it doesn't work, and returns empty string, dunno why. function GetWindowsID: string; var Registry: TRegistry; str:string; begin Registry := TRegistry.Create(KEY_WRITE); try Registry.Lazywrite := false; Registry.RootKey := HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE; // Registry.RootKey := HKEY_CURRENT_USER; if CheckForWinNT = true then Begin if not Registry.OpenKeyReadOnly('\Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion') then showmessagE('cant open'); end else Registry.OpenKeyReadOnly('\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion'); str := Registry.ReadString('ProductId'); result:=str; Registry.CloseKey; finally Registry.Free; end; // try..finally end; Anybody can help?

    Read the article

  • Creating custom IP-STS for sharepoint foundation 2010 without ADFS

    - by user252229
    I plan to create very simple custom IP-STS for SharePoint foundation 2010 without ADFS server so anyone can integrate Windows Live ID to SharePoint foundation 2010 simply without ADFS, I can't use ADFS server because it could not install on Windows Web Server 2008 (Web Edition), also I found many article use LDAP provider but it does not exists in SharePoint Foundation too (it requires Sharepoint Server Edition). After too much searching I just found the following article and find all technique except one problem. 1) Creating Custom Claim Provider: blogs.technet.com/b/speschka/archive/2010/03/13/writing-a-custom-claims-provider-for-sharepoint-2010-part-1.aspx 2) Creating Custom STS Provider: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/chunliu/archive/2010/04/02/how-to-make-use-of-a-custom-ip-sts-with-sharepoint-2010-part-1.aspx Only one step remains: I got following error after enter username in STS site and redirect to localhost/_trust/default.aspx , ( I leave EncryptingCertificateName empty). Operation is not valid due to the current state of the object I expect to get access denied error instead of that error. 1.Is it possible anyway? 2.Can anyone help me where can I find working article to create custom IP-STS without ADFS server Any idea will help me Thanks

    Read the article

  • How to get identities of inserted data records using SQL bulk copy

    - by Olga
    Hello I have a ADO.NET dataTable with about 100.000 records. In this table there is a column "xyID" which has no values in it, because they are generated by insertion into my MSSQL Database. Now i have the problem, that i need this IDs for other processes. I am looking for a way to bulk copy this dataTable into the MSSQL database, and within the same "step" to "fill" my dataTable with the generated IDs. Thank you for your answers!

    Read the article

  • Asp.net MVC and MOSS 2010 integration

    - by Robert Koritnik
    Just a sidenote: I'm not sure whether I should post this to serverfault as well, because some MOSS admin may have some info for me as well? A bit of explanation first (without Asp.net MVC) Is it possible to integrate the two? Is it possible to write an application that would share at least credential information with MOSS? I have to write a MOSS application that has to do with these technologies: MOSS 2010 Personal client certificates authentication (most probably on USB keys) Active Directory Federation Services Separate SQL DB that would serve application specific data (separate as not being part of MOSS DB) How should it work? Users should authenticate using personal certificates into MOSS 2010 There would be a certain part of MOSS that would be related to my custom application This application should only authorize certain users via AD FS - I guess these users should have a certain security claim attached to them This application should manage users (that have access to this app) with additional (app specific) security claims related to this application (as additional application level authorization rights for individual application parts) This application should use custom SQL 2008 DB heavily with its own data This application should have the possibility to integrate with external systems as well (Exchange for instance to inject calendar entries, ERP systems etc) This application should be able to export its data (from its DB) to files. I don't know if it's possible, but it would be nice if the app could add these files to MOSS and attach authorization info to them so only users with sufficient rights would be able to view/open these files. Why Asp.net MVC then? I'm very well versed in Asp.net MVC (also with the latest version) and I haven't done anything on Sharepoint since version 2003 (which doesn't do me no good or prepare me for the latest version in any way shape or form). This project will most probably be a death march project so I would rather write my application as a UI rich Asp.net MVC application and somehow integrate it into MOSS. But not only via a link, because I would like to at least share credentials, so users wouldn't need to re-login when accessing my app. Using Asp.net MVC I would at least have the possibility to finish on time or be less death marching. Is this at all possible? Questions Is it possible to integrate Asp.net MVC into MOSS as described above? If integration is not possible, would it be possible to create a completely MOSS based application that would work as described? Which parts of MOSS 2010 should I use to accomplish what I need?

    Read the article

  • Asp.net MVC/Silverlight and Sharepoint 2010 integration

    - by Robert Koritnik
    Just a sidenote: I'm not sure whether I should post this to serverfault as well, because some MOSS admin may have some info for me as well? Additional note 1: I've found this document (Asp.net MVC 2 & Sharepoint integration) if anybody with sufficient expirience is willing to comment on its content whether this can be used in my described scenario or not. Additional note 2: I've discovered (later) that Silverlight is supported in Sharepoint 2010 so I'm considering it as well. So if anyone would comment on silverlight integration as well. A bit of explanation first (without Asp.net MVC/Silverlight) Is it possible to integrate the two? Is it possible to write an application that would share at least credential information with MOSS? I have to write a MOSS application that has to do with these technologies: MOSS 2010 Personal client certificates authentication (most probably on USB keys) Active Directory Federation Services Separate SQL DB that would serve application specific data (separate as not being part of MOSS DB) How should it work? Users should authenticate using personal certificates into MOSS 2010 There would be a certain part of MOSS that would be related to my custom application This application should only authorize certain users via AD FS - I guess these users should have a certain security claim attached to them This application should manage users (that have access to this app) with additional (app specific) security claims related to this application (as additional application level authorization rights for individual application parts) This application should use custom SQL 2008 DB heavily with its own data This application should have the possibility to integrate with external systems as well (Exchange for instance to inject calendar entries, ERP systems etc) This application should be able to export its data (from its DB) to files. I don't know if it's possible, but it would be nice if the app could add these files to MOSS and attach authorization info to them so only users with sufficient rights would be able to view/open these files. Why Asp.net MVC/Silverlight then? I'm very well versed in Asp.net MVC (also with the latest version) and I haven't done anything on Sharepoint since version 2003 (which doesn't do me no good or prepare me for the latest version in any way shape or form). This project will most probably be a death march project so I would rather write my application as a UI rich Asp.net MVC application and somehow integrate it into MOSS. But not only via a link, because I would like to at least share credentials, so users wouldn't need to re-login when accessing my app. Using Asp.net MVC I would at least have the possibility to finish on time or be less death marching. Is this at all possible? I haven't done any serious project using SIlverlight, but I will sooner or later have to. So I'm also considering a jump into it at this moment, because it still might make this application development easier than strict Sharepoint 2010. Questions Is it possible to integrate Asp.net MVC/Silverlight into MOSS as described above? If integration is not possible, would it be possible to create a completely MOSS based application that would work as described? Which parts of MOSS 2010 should I use to accomplish what I need?

    Read the article

  • Autoincrementing hierarchical IDs on SQL Server

    - by Ville Koskinen
    Consider this table on SQL Server wordID aliasID value =========================== 0 0 'cat' 1 0 'dog' 2 0 'argh' 2 1 'ugh' WordID is a id of a word which possibly has aliases. AliasID determines a specific alias to a word. So above 'argh' and 'ugh' are aliases to each other. I'd like to be able to insert new words which do not have any aliases in the table without having to query the table for a free wordID value first. Inserting value 'hey' without specifying a wordID or an aliasID, a row looking like this would be created: wordID aliasID value =========================== 3 0 'hey' Is this possible and how?

    Read the article

  • C# dictionary uniqueness for sibling classes using IEquatable<T>

    - by anthony
    I would like to store insances of two classes in a dictionary structure and use IEquatable to determine uniqueness of these instances. Both of these classes share an (abstract) base class. Consider the following classes: abstract class Foo { ... } class SubFoo1 : Foo { ... } class SubFoo2 : Foo { ... } The dictionary will be delcared: Dictionary<Foo, Bar> Which classes should be declared as IEquatable? And what should the generic type T be for those declarations? Is this even possible?

    Read the article

  • Managing Unique IDs in stateless (web) DB4O applications

    - by Phil.Wheeler
    I'm playing around with building a new web application using DB4O - piles of fun and some really interesting stuff learned. The one thing I'm struggling with is DB4O's current lack of support for stateless applications (i.e. web apps, mostly) and the need for automatically-generated IDs. There are a number of creative and interesting approaches that I've been able to find that hook into DB4O's events, use GUIDs rather than numeric IDs or for whatever reason avoid using any system of ID at all. While each approach has its merits, I'm wondering if the less-elegant approach might equally be the best fit. Consider the following pseudo-code: If ID == 0 or null Set ID = (typeof(myObject)).Count myObject.Save It seems like such a blindingly simple approach, it's usually about here that I start thinking, "I've missed something really obvious". Have I?

    Read the article

  • Modifying my website to allow anonymous comments

    - by David
    I write the code for my own website as an educational/fun exercise. Right now part of the website is a blog (like every other site out there :-/) which supports the usual basic blog features, including commenting on posts. But I only have comments enabled for logged-in users; I want to alter the code to allow anonymous comments - that is, I want to allow people to post comments without first creating a user account on my site, although there will still be some sort of authentication involved to prevent spam. Question: what information should I save for anonymous comments? I'm thinking at least display name and email address (for displaying a Gravatar), and probably website URL because I eventually want to accept OpenID as well, but would anything else make sense? Other question: how should I modify the database to store this information? The schema I have for the comment table is currently comment_id smallint(5) // The unique comment ID post_id smallint(5) // The ID of the post the comment was made on user_id smallint(5) // The ID of the user account who made the comment comment_subject varchar(128) comment_date timestamp comment_text text Should I add additional fields for name, email address, etc. to the comment table? (seems like a bad idea) Create a new "anonymous users" table? (and if so, how to keep anonymous user ids from conflicting with regular user ids) Or create fake user accounts for anonymous users in my existing users table? Part of what's making this tricky is that if someone tries to post an anonymous comment using an email address (or OpenID) that's already associated with an account on my site, I'd like to catch that and prompt them to log in.

    Read the article

  • How does Hibernate detect dirty state of an entity object?

    - by ???'Lenik
    Is it using some kind of byte codes modification to the original classes? Or, maybe Hibernate get the dirty state by compare the given object with previously persisted version? I'm having a problem with hashCode() and equals() methods for complicated objects. I feel it would be very slow to compute hash code if the object has collection members, and cyclic references are also a problem. If Hibernate won't use hashCode()/equals() to check the dirty state, I guess I should not use equals()/hashCode() for the entity object (not value object), but I'm also afraid if the same operator (==) is not enough. So, the questions are: How does Hibernate know if a property of an object is changed? Do you suggest to override the hashCode()/equals() methods for complicated objects? What if they contains cyclic references? And, also, Would hashCode()/equals() with only the id field be enough?

    Read the article

  • Call Dispose() on a WindowsIdentity object? C#

    - by Andy
    I am retrieving a WindowsIdentity object by calling: win_id = System.Security.Principal.WindowsIdentity.GetCurrent(); with the intention of getting the currently logged on user name, which works fine. WindowsIdentity implements IDisposable, but since I din't create the object myself, do I still need to call .Dispose() on it when I am finished with it or not? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • SharePoint 2010 and FBA

    - by itaysk
    Hi, I an trying to setup Forms Based Authentication using ASPNetSQLMembershipProvider. In 2010 Beta 2, I was able to do this in classic mode, and it worked. With the RTM, it is no longer supported under classic mode, and I must switch to Claims based Authentication. So I created a new web application, and configured everything in sharepoint to work with FBA, But I can't get it to work. Anyone managed to do this? Thanks, Itay.

    Read the article

  • Different Service behaviors per endpoint

    - by Preben Huybrechts
    The situation We are implementing different sort of security on some WCF service. ClientCertificate, UserName & Password and Anonymous. We have 2 ServiceBehaviorConfigurations, one for httpBinding and one for wsHttpBinding. (We have custom authorization policies for claim based security) As a requirement we need different endpoints for each service. 3 endpoints with httpBinding and 1 with wsHttpBinding. Example for one service: basicHttpBinding : Anonymous basicHttpBinding : UserNameAndPassword basicHttpBinding : BasicSsl wsHttpBinding : BasicSsl The Problem Part 1: We cannot specify the same service twice, once with the http service configuration and once with the wsHttp service configuration. Part 2: We cannot specify service behaviors on an endpoint. (Throws and exception, No endpoint behavior was found... Service behaviors cant be set to endpoint behaviours) The Config For part 1: <services> <service name="Namespace.MyService" behaviorConfiguration="securityBehavior"> <endpoint address="http://server:94/MyService.svc/Anonymous" contract="Namespace.IMyService" binding="basicHttpBinding" bindingConfiguration="Anonymous"> </endpoint> <endpoint address="http://server:94/MyService.svc/UserNameAndPassword" contract="Namespace.IMyService" binding="basicHttpBinding" bindingConfiguration="UserNameAndPassword"> </endpoint> <endpoint address="https://server/MyService.svc/BasicSsl" contract="Namespace.IMyService" binding="basicHttpBinding" bindingConfiguration="BasicSecured"> </endpoint> </service> <service name="Namespace.MyService" behaviorConfiguration="wsHttpCertificateBehavior"> <endpoint address="https://server/MyService.svc/ClientCert" contract="Namespace.IMyService" binding="wsHttpBinding" bindingConfiguration="ClientCert"/> </service> </services> Service Behavior configuration: <serviceBehaviors> <behavior name="securityBehavior"> <serviceAuthorization serviceAuthorizationManagerType="Namespace.AdamAuthorizationManager,Assembly"> <authorizationPolicies> <add policyType="Namespace.AdamAuthorizationManager,Assembly" /> </authorizationPolicies> </serviceAuthorization> </behavior> <behavior name="wsHttpCertificateBehavior"> <serviceMetadata httpGetEnabled="false" httpsGetEnabled="true"/> <serviceAuthorization serviceAuthorizationManagerType="Namespace.AdamAuthorizationManager,Assembly"> <authorizationPolicies> <add policyType="Namespace.AdamAuthorizationManager,Assembly" /> </authorizationPolicies> </serviceAuthorization> <serviceCredentials> <clientCertificate> <authentication certificateValidationMode="PeerOrChainTrust" revocationMode="NoCheck"/> </clientCertificate> <serviceCertificate findValue="CN=CertSubject"/> </serviceCredentials> </behavior> How can we specify a different service behaviour on the WsHttpBinding endpoint? Or how can we apply our authorization policy in a different way for wsHttpBinding then basicHttpBinding. We would use endpoint behavior but we can't specify our authorization policy on an endpoint behavior

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45  | Next Page >