Search Results

Search found 27628 results on 1106 pages for 'google apps'.

Page 387/1106 | < Previous Page | 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394  | Next Page >

  • Dropbox links in a Phonegap app (Android)

    - by genericatz
    I try to create downloadable links to files which can be downloaded directly after clicking the link. I added "dl" instead of "www" and "?dl=1" in the end of the dropbox link (dropbox api: directly download files). The direct download works perfectly in the chrome browser but if I package the app which phonegap and click on the same link whithin the resulting app the file will not be downloaded. Is this not possible whithin the adroid browser or do I have to modify some android browser preferences?

    Read the article

  • HTG Explains: Do Non-Windows Platforms Like Mac, Android, iOS, and Linux Get Viruses?

    - by Chris Hoffman
    Viruses and other types of malware seem largely confined to Windows in the real world. Even on a Windows 8 PC, you can still get infected with malware. But how vulnerable are other operating systems to malware? When we say “viruses,” we’re actually talking about malware in general. There’s more to malware than just viruses, although the word virus is often used to talk about malware in general. Why Are All the Viruses For Windows? Not all of the malware out there is for Windows, but most of it is. We’ve tried to cover why Windows has the most viruses in the past. Windows’ popularity is definitely a big factor, but there are other reasons, too. Historically, Windows was never designed for security in the way that UNIX-like platforms were — and every popular operating system that’s not Windows is based on UNIX. Windows also has a culture of installing software by searching the web and downloading it from websites, whereas other platforms have app stores and Linux has centralized software installation from a secure source in the form of its package managers. Do Macs Get Viruses? The vast majority of malware is designed for Windows systems and Macs don’t get Windows malware. While Mac malware is much more rare, Macs are definitely not immune to malware. They can be infected by malware written specifically for Macs, and such malware does exist. At one point, over 650,000 Macs were infected with the Flashback Trojan. [Source] It infected Macs through the Java browser plugin, which is a security nightmare on every platform. Macs no longer include Java by default. Apple also has locked down Macs in other ways. Three things in particular help: Mac App Store: Rather than getting desktop programs from the web and possibly downloading malware, as inexperienced users might on Windows, they can get their applications from a secure place. It’s similar to a smartphone app store or even a Linux package manager. Gatekeeper: Current releases of Mac OS X use Gatekeeper, which only allows programs to run if they’re signed by an approved developer or if they’re from the Mac App Store. This can be disabled by geeks who need to run unsigned software, but it acts as additional protection for typical users. XProtect: Macs also have a built-in technology known as XProtect, or File Quarantine. This feature acts as a blacklist, preventing known-malicious programs from running. It functions similarly to Windows antivirus programs, but works in the background and checks applications you download. Mac malware isn’t coming out nearly as quick as Windows malware, so it’s easier for Apple to keep up. Macs are certainly not immune to all malware, and someone going out of their way to download pirated applications and disable security features may find themselves infected. But Macs are much less at risk of malware in the real world. Android is Vulnerable to Malware, Right? Android malware does exist and companies that produce Android security software would love to sell you their Android antivirus apps. But that isn’t the full picture. By default, Android devices are configured to only install apps from Google Play. They also benefit from antimalware scanning — Google Play itself scans apps for malware. You could disable this protection and go outside Google Play, getting apps from elsewhere (“sideloading”). Google will still help you if you do this, asking if you want to scan your sideloaded apps for malware when you try to install them. In China, where many, many Android devices are in use, there is no Google Play Store. Chinese Android users don’t benefit from Google’s antimalware scanning and have to get their apps from third-party app stores, which may contain infected copies of apps. The majority of Android malware comes from outside Google Play. The scary malware statistics you see primarily include users who get apps from outside Google Play, whether it’s pirating infected apps or acquiring them from untrustworthy app stores. As long as you get your apps from Google Play — or even another secure source, like the Amazon App Store — your Android phone or tablet should be secure. What About iPads and iPhones? Apple’s iOS operating system, used on its iPads, iPhones, and iPod Touches, is more locked down than even Macs and Android devices. iPad and iPhone users are forced to get their apps from Apple’s App Store. Apple is more demanding of developers than Google is — while anyone can upload an app to Google Play and have it available instantly while Google does some automated scanning, getting an app onto Apple’s App Store involves a manual review of that app by an Apple employee. The locked-down environment makes it much more difficult for malware to exist. Even if a malicious application could be installed, it wouldn’t be able to monitor what you typed into your browser and capture your online-banking information without exploiting a deeper system vulnerability. Of course, iOS devices aren’t perfect either. Researchers have proven it’s possible to create malicious apps and sneak them past the app store review process. [Source] However, if a malicious app was discovered, Apple could pull it from the store and immediately uninstall it from all devices. Google and Microsoft have this same ability with Android’s Google Play and Windows Store for new Windows 8-style apps. Does Linux Get Viruses? Malware authors don’t tend to target Linux desktops, as so few average users use them. Linux desktop users are more likely to be geeks that won’t fall for obvious tricks. As with Macs, Linux users get most of their programs from a single place — the package manager — rather than downloading them from websites. Linux also can’t run Windows software natively, so Windows viruses just can’t run. Linux desktop malware is extremely rare, but it does exist. The recent “Hand of Thief” Trojan supports a variety of Linux distributions and desktop environments, running in the background and stealing online banking information. It doesn’t have a good way if infecting Linux systems, though — you’d have to download it from a website or receive it as an email attachment and run the Trojan. [Source] This just confirms how important it is to only run trusted software on any platform, even supposedly secure ones. What About Chromebooks? Chromebooks are locked down laptops that only run the Chrome web browser and some bits around it. We’re not really aware of any form of Chrome OS malware. A Chromebook’s sandbox helps protect it against malware, but it also helps that Chromebooks aren’t very common yet. It would still be possible to infect a Chromebook, if only by tricking a user into installing a malicious browser extension from outside the Chrome web store. The malicious browser extension could run in the background, steal your passwords and online banking credentials, and send it over the web. Such malware could even run on Windows, Mac, and Linux versions of Chrome, but it would appear in the Extensions list, would require the appropriate permissions, and you’d have to agree to install it manually. And Windows RT? Microsoft’s Windows RT only runs desktop programs written by Microsoft. Users can only install “Windows 8-style apps” from the Windows Store. This means that Windows RT devices are as locked down as an iPad — an attacker would have to get a malicious app into the store and trick users into installing it or possibly find a security vulnerability that allowed them to bypass the protection. Malware is definitely at its worst on Windows. This would probably be true even if Windows had a shining security record and a history of being as secure as other operating systems, but you can definitely avoid a lot of malware just by not using Windows. Of course, no platform is a perfect malware-free environment. You should exercise some basic precautions everywhere. Even if malware was eliminated, we’d have to deal with social-engineering attacks like phishing emails asking for credit card numbers. Image Credit: stuartpilbrow on Flickr, Kansir on Flickr     

    Read the article

  • Yahoo! met le paquet pour débaucher un autre cadre supérieur de Google : Henrique de Castro, ex. président des médias

    Yahoo! met le paquet pour débaucher un autre cadre supérieur de Google Henrique de Castro, ex. président des médias Après avoir recruté Marissa Mayer en tant que responsable de la direction en juillet, Yahoo! débauche un autre pilier de Google. Il s'agit d'Henrique de Castro, le désormais ex-président des médias de Google et nouveau chef d'exploitation, responsable de la gestion stratégique et opérationnelle du chiffre d'affaires à Yahoo! [IMG]http://idelways.developpez.com/news/images/yahoo-coo.jpg[/IMG] Selon The Wall Street Journal, Yahoo! a élevé la rémunération de M. de Castro ...

    Read the article

  • What are all the components of a "Facebook App"?

    - by pnongrata
    I am a developer who has never personally partaken in social media (in any form) for reasons completely outside the scope of this question. I am "off the grid" (no Facebook, Twitter, etc accounts). I'm currently building a web app and would like the app to have a presence on Facebook, and possibly even "port" my app over as a Facebook app. My understanding of Facebook Apps is that they're just normal web apps that get <iframe>d into a Facebook page. The app is actually hosted on your server (not FB's servers). But this got me thinking: Don't Facebook Apps have "profile pages"? Is there anything developers can do to customize the behavior of their own profile pages? Do apps have the ability to do things like MySpace themes used to do (i.e., customize and interact with User profile pages, Groups, etc.)? Do Facebook Apps gain any sort of extra capabilities (inside of Facebook) that a normal web app would not have? It seems to me like if all a Facebook App is, is an iframed-web app, that it would still need to communicate with Facebook via its many APIs, just like a normal app would have to, right? If it's not possible to write an app that can customize the UI or behavior of user profiles and other pages, then how do games like "Farmville" interact with User profiles so that you see updates to profiles like "John Smith reached level 2 of Farmville"? Basically, I'm asking any battle-worn Facebook app developers if my understanding of Facebook Apps is correct, or if I'm missing anything big here. It's my understanding that for security reasons (obviously) Facebook doesn't allow apps to customize anything outside of the iframe it lives in. So if I want my app to appear like it's "interacting" with its Facebook users, it looks like I just need to publish stuff to the users' news feeds to try and encourage people to use my app (please correct me if I'm wrong here!). Thanks in advance for any corrections, clarifications, advice or suggestions!

    Read the article

  • How to Integrate Dropbox with Pages, Keynote, and Numbers on iPad

    - by The Geek
    The iWork apps are some of the best apps on the iPad, and each show just how powerful a touchscreen device can be with the most basic of computing functions. In fact, there’s not much to dislike about the iWork apps, except for one thing: importing and exporting files. You can open documents from email attachments, download them from websites, or import them from other apps like Dropbox. Once you’ve opened your file in Pages, Keynote, or Numbers on iPad, though, you can only send it via email, upload it to a WebDAV server or Apple’s iDisk service, or wait to sync it with iTunes on your computer. Most other iOS office apps don’t offer nearly as many features as the iWork apps, but they do offer deep integration with Dropbox which makes it easy to view and edit your documents no matter where you are. Dropbox is the most popular file sync and sharing solution, and makes it absolutely painless to share folders with anyone around the world and keep your computers in sync. That is, computers and applications that integrate with Dropbox. However, you don’t need to give up on using Dropbox with iWork apps on iPad. Today we’re going to look at how you can enable WebDAV compatibility on your Dropbox account to let Pages integrate nearly the whole way with Dropbox. It’s not a perfect solution, but it’s much better than the default setup. So let’s get started Latest Features How-To Geek ETC How to Integrate Dropbox with Pages, Keynote, and Numbers on iPad RGB? CMYK? Alpha? What Are Image Channels and What Do They Mean? How to Recover that Photo, Picture or File You Deleted Accidentally How To Colorize Black and White Vintage Photographs in Photoshop How To Get SSH Command-Line Access to Windows 7 Using Cygwin The How-To Geek Video Guide to Using Windows 7 Speech Recognition Stylebot Customizes Web Pages in Chrome, Now Has Downloadable Styles Blackberry, Dell, Apple, and Motorola Tablets Compared [Infographic] Encrypt Your Google Search Queries Vintage Posters Showcase the History of Tech Advertising Google Cloud Print Extension Lets You Print Doc/PDF/Txt Files from Web Sites Hack a $10 Flashlight into an Ultra-bright Premium One

    Read the article

  • Google, Microsoft et Facebook sont-ils comparables ? Ou bien ces entreprises sont-elles trop uniques en leur genre ?

    Google, Microsoft et Facebook sont-ils comparables ? Ou bien ces entreprises sont-elles trop uniques en leur genre ? Don Dodge, un passionné d'économie numérique travaillant chez Google et ayant travaillé pour Microsoft, se demande si trois grandes firmes de l'IT peuvent être comparables. En effet, Microsoft, Google et Facebook sont toutes trois très importantes, pour ne pas dire colossales, et elles sont toutes apparues comme innovantes à leur création. A leurs débuts, elles étaient nettement moins imposantes et les investisseurs hésitaient même à y investir. C'est un peu le cas de Facebook aujourd'hui, la firme surévaluée à outrance. Tous en veulent leur part, mais peu sont sûr de ce que cela va leur rapporter.

    Read the article

  • « Google pourrait ne plus exister dans cinq ans », la faute à Siri d'Apple d'après un analyste financier américain. Vraiment ?

    « Google pourrait ne plus exister dans 5 ans » La faute à Siri d'Apple d'après un analyste américain. Vraiment ? Les derniers mauvais résultats financiers de Google ? surtout plombés par Motorola ? n'ont pas tardé à susciter des vocations d'oracles alarmistes. Parmi ces nouveaux omniscients adeptes du catastrophisme, Eric Jackson, le créateur du fonds d'investissement Ironfire Capital spécialisé dans les technologies, ne fait pas dans la nuance. « Google pourrait disparaitre d'ici 5 à 8 ans comme Yahoo !, qui était le roi du search, a disparu », a-t-il ainsi déclaré à la chaîne financière CNBC. Cette disparition viendrait des usages mobiles. Les utilisateurs voudrai...

    Read the article

  • Google offre son soutien à la Fondation Apache, en mettant en ligne un catalogue des projets open-source utilisants ses outils

    Google offre son soutien à la Fondation Apache, en mettant en ligne un catalogue des projets open-source utilisants ses outils Alors que la Fondation Apache est en pleine bataille avec Oracle, une autre firme vient lui apporter son soutien (dans un autre domaine). L'organisation propose une multitude de solutions logicielles, sans oublier son produit le plus populaire : son serveur web éponyme, actuellement utilisé sur plus de 59.4% des serveurs mondiaux. Mountain View, qui collabore avec la Fondation sur divers projets, vient de lancer aujourd'hui ses Apache Extras. Il s'agit d'outils de recherche permettant de naviguer facilement parmi les projets basés sur les outils et les technologies d'Apache. ...

    Read the article

  • Compilateurs JavaScript : Mozilla ne compte pas se laisser distancer par Google mais reconnait le travail de ses développeurs

    Compilateur JavaScript : Firefox ne compte pas se laisser distancer par Chrome Mais Mozilla reconnait le travail des développeurs de Google La vitesse d'exécution du JavaScript dans les navigateurs semble occuper une place capitale. L'amélioration des moteurs est toujours mis en avant à chaque nouvelles versions des navigateurs. Cette semaine, pour la sortie de Chrome OS, Chrome (le navigateur) n'a pas fait exception à la règle avec une communication très appuyée sur Crankshaft. Et les premières comparaisons issues du premier Benchmark n'ont pas tardé. David Mandeling, membre de l'équipe JavaScript chez Mozilla, vient en effet de publier sur son blog ...

    Read the article

  • Bing Maps intègre les plans des centres commerciaux, pour concurrencer les futurs magasins virtuels en 3D de Google Maps ?

    Bing Maps intègre les plans des centres commerciaux Pour concurrencer les futurs magasins virtuels en 3D des Google Maps ? Les cartes du moteur de recherche de Microsoft ? les Bing Maps ? s'enrichissent d'une nouvelle fonctionnalité. En plus des plans des rues d'une ville, le service propose d'intégrer les plans des magasins, ou plus exactement des centres commerciaux. Avez-vous déjà vécu l'expérience de ne pas savoir où se trouve le magasin dont vous avez besoin et que le plan du centre commercial ne se trouve nulle part ? C'est dans cet esprit que l'équipe de développement du service vient d'intégrer les cartes « mall directory » aux cartes Bing. Ces cartes...

    Read the article

  • Will my new HTML5 website decrease my Google ranking?

    - by Joshua
    Hi, I have a traditional HTML website that loads pages/sections of the site when people click on menu items. Pretty standard. Currently, I'm working on relaunching my website with a brand new HTML5 code & jquery that loads the whole thing, and just slides from one section to the next, sort of like this website: http://www.mino.pl/ My concern is that this will affect my ranking with google and websiteoutlook.com because it may seem like the website only has one page now instead of 8, making it look like I have less pageviews and making my site less relevant for search engine rankings. Are my concerns legit? If so, do you have suggestions on how to avoid it? I really like the idea of working with a page that 'slides' to different sections better than having pages load all the time. Any suggestions/thoughts would be very much appreciated. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Ubuntu server on VM outgoing network(ping google.com) working, incoming(127.0.0.1:8080) is not. Was working previusly

    - by IvarsB
    I have recently installed Ubuntu server with LAMP,OpenSSH and mail on Oracle's VM, it's incoming networking was recently working, apache's default message could be seen when opening 127.0.0.1:8080. But now it's not! :( Could you give me any tips? I couldn't google anything that helped me. :( I'm running windows 7 with such settings http://www.bildites.lv/images/3d91ikwtraw0ld7lhv.png I recently used apt-get --purge remove phpmyadmin. Could that be the problem? How should I fix it? Thank you in advance! Ivars. EDIT: Sorry for the lame formating.

    Read the article

  • Does google contribute ranking from cdn.example.com to example.com?

    - by DesignerGuy
    Background From my understanding, http://mywebsite.com/image.jpg, can help the ranking of http://mywebsite.com in a search engine, such as Google (obviously the search engine of primary concern). So, SEO-wise, moving an image to http://whatever-cdn.com/my-account/image.jpg is bad. A popular solution is to use a CNAME record, such as http://cdn.mywebsite.com, so that image.jpg can be accessed at http://cdn.mywebsite.com/image.jpg. The question Does http://cdn.mywebsite.com/image.jpg rank as effectively as http://mywebsite.com/image.jpg ? Does it help boost the main http://mywebsite.com ? Or, does it rank independently because it is a subdomain? Is there another option (a way to use a CDN without sacrificing ranking)?

    Read the article

  • Multisites Network SEO::Can self-referencing canonical tag(rel="canonical") inside article improve google rating?

    - by user5674576
    Hi, Can self-referencing canonical tag(rel="canonical") inside article improve google rating? The Case: Company have 40 sites with original content and 1 main site with some of 40 sites articles. Main site have rel="canonical" in each article Should article in original site have also rel="canonical" for self-referencing? example: inside main network site(reference to other site):<link href="http://site7.com/article25" rel="canonical" /> inside original network site(self-reference):<link href="http://site7.com/article25" rel="canonical"/> Thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • How to add sitemap of a blogger blog to Google webmaster tools?

    - by Chankey Pathak
    I have two blogs. Let's say http://name.blogspot.com/ and the other one is http://name2.blogspot.com/ For blog 1: While submitting sitemap to Google webmaster tool I selected the option and then added rss.xml at last. (http://name.blogspot.com/rss.xml) Sitemap added successfully. For blog 2: I followed the same procedure but it didn't work. Then I tried to open the url (http://name.blogspot.com/rss.xml). The url was showing the atom feeds. I tried same with the other blog but that url is redirecting to the feedburner feeds. I think this is the reason why the other blog's sitemap is not getting submitted. Help me with it.

    Read the article

  • How to recover Google classic design from its new design?

    - by Steven
    I typed this into my address bar: javascript:void(document.cookie=”PREF=ID=20b6e4c2f44943bb:U=4bf292d46faad806:TM=1249677602:LM=1257919388:S=odm0Ys-53ZueXfZG;path=/; domain=.google.com”); However, I don't like the new design of Google. How to switch back? How to cancel this effect using Javascript? How to reverse by using Javascript?

    Read the article

  • Google a-t-il raté son entrée sur le marché des tablettes ? Android connaît une "croissance pénible" d'après DisplaySearch

    Google a-t-il raté son entrée sur le marché des tablettes ? Android connaît une "croissance pénible" d'après DisplaySearch Six mois après le lancement d'Android 3 (alias Honeycomb), force est de constater que les ventes des tablettes qui tournent dessus sont loin de défrayer les chroniques, elles ne semblent pas être en mesure en tout cas de freiner les ventes frénétiques de l'iPad d'Apple. Pour l'analyste Richard Shim de DisplaySearch, l'univers Android connaît une « croissance pénible » avec Honeycomb : « il est clair que les premières tablettes fondées sur Android ne s'écoulent pas aussi bien que ce que beaucoup attendaient, quelques marques avec lesquelles ...

    Read the article

  • Is the escaping provided by the Google-Gson library enough to ensure a safe JSON payload?

    - by Lifetime_Learner
    I am currently using the Google-Gson library to convert Java objects into JSON inside a web service. Once the object has been converted to JSON, it is returned to the client to be converted into a JSON object using the JavaScript eval() function. Is the character escaping provided by the Gson library enough to ensure that nothing nasty will happen when I run the eval() function on the JSON payload? Do I need to HTML Encode the Strings in the Java Objects before passing them to the Gson library? Are there any other security concerns that I should be aware of?

    Read the article

  • Chrome OS : nouvelle mise à jour et ajout de la bêta de Chrome 10 dans l'OS orienté Cloud de Google

    Chrome OS : mise à jour Et ajout de la bêta de Chrome 10 Google vient d'effectuer une mise à jour de la bêta de son système d'exploitation Chrome OS avec le port de la bêta de son navigateur Chrome 10 publié il y a de cela quelques semaines. Plusieurs fonctionnalités de Chrome OS ont été améliorées parmi lesquelles la 3G (activation du modem et connexion), le WI-FI, Gtalk (pour les vidéo-conférences) ou la mise à jour automatique du moteur et amélioration du débogage ; A noter que des problèmes important de gestion des Trackpads (système qui remplace les souris sur les PC portables) ont été réglé. Ce...

    Read the article

  • Popularité des langages : Go de Google chute, Objective-C dans le Top 10, d'après l'index de juin de

    Mise à jour du 07/06/10 Popularité des langages : Go chute, Objective-C dans le Top 10 D'après le classement du TIOBE Programming Community Index de juin Au delà de la rivalité entre Java et C, les deux langages qui continuent de se disputer la première place du classement des langages de programmation les plus populaires, l'index mensuel de TIOBE recèle en juin deux enseignements intéressants. Le premier concerne Go, le langage de Google qui avait récemment fait une progression fracassante. Go connait aujourd'hui un recul très significatif puisqu'il recule brutalement et disparaît du Top 20 de l'indice (21ème). En sens...

    Read the article

  • Pwn2Own 2011 : BlackBerry et l'iPhone 4 vaincus lors du concours de hacking, les produits Google demeurent intouchés

    Pwn2Own 2011 : BlackBerry et l'iPhone 4 vaincus lors du concours de hacking, les produits Google demeurent intouchés Mise à jour du 11.03.2011 par Katleen Pour sa deuxième journée, le Pwn2Own a encore fait quelques victimes, mais en a aussi épargné certains. Les victimes potentielles de la journée étaient les systèmes d'exploitation mobile mais aussi Firefox (3.6), le navigateur qui n'avait pas été malmené hier. Seulement, Sam Dash, qui devait lui régler son compte, ne s'est pas présenté au concours. "Je ne peux pas écrire une code d'exploitation viable" pour ce challenge, s'est-il justifié. En revanche, l'iPhone 4 et le BlackBerry Torch sont tombés. Pour le s...

    Read the article

  • Adobe s'associe à Google et Mozilla pour corriger un bogue, qui permettait de restaurer des cookies supprimés via Flash Player

    Adobe s'associe à Google et Mozilla pour corriger un bogue, qui permettait de restaurer des cookies supprimés via Flash Player Les LSO (Local Storage Objects) en place dans le Flash Player d'Adobe, peuvent être diablement utiles : stockage de diverses informations évitant d'avoir à les ressaisir, ou de perdre des données en ligne (travail en cours dans une application, identifiants, historique, etc.). Mais chaque médaille à son revers, surtout lorsqu'il est question de laisser des sites et des logiciels retenir des informations. Déjà, ces derniers peuvent être utilisés pour la restauration de cookies de navigateur qui avaient été supprimés. De quoi récupérer des données permettant de tracker un internaute. Adobe a do...

    Read the article

  • Smartphones : la guerre des brevets est lancée, Google protège-t-il assez HTC et ses partenaires And

    Mise à jour du 30.04.2010 par Katleen Smartphones : la guerre des brevets est lancée, Google protège-t-il assez HTC et ses partenaires Android ? Alors qu'Apple s'emploie déjà depuis plusieurs mois à mettre des bâtons dans les roues d'Android, Microsoft se joint à la danse. Le marché des smartphones est en plein essor et attire de plus en plus les groupes informatiques qui voient en lui un atout stratégique très important. La compétition fait rage et les grands groupes commencent a faire feu de leurs brevets dans cette bataille. Les avocats d'HTC ont été asticotés de toute part, d'abord par Apple puis par Microsoft, à propos de ses téléphones Android. La quatrième ...

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394  | Next Page >