Search Results

Search found 2201 results on 89 pages for 'anti spam'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 39/89 | < Previous Page | 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46  | Next Page >

  • phpbb users table entries deletion and its effects. what are all the clean up work before deleting an user

    - by Jayapal Chandran
    I am writing a window program which will run from the system tray. which will ping my phpbb board site to fetch new users registration information. So with the result i can check whether the user is spam user or not. if i feel it is a spam user then i will delete that entry from the users table. before deleting the users table what are all the other table that i should delete. so that there will not be any unlinked references which will then in due course of time gets numerous and waste of disk space. so i want to know what i should do before deleting an user so that all his other activities should be cleaned off before i deleting a user.

    Read the article

  • Phishing : une nouvelle technique se répand avec le HTML5, elle contourne le blacklistage des URL malicieuses

    Phishing : une nouvelle technique se répand avec le HTML5 Elle contourne le blacklistage des URL malicieuses Les spammeurs et autres cyber-escrocs se mettent eux aussi au HTML5 pour contourner les mesures anti-spam et anti-phishing de plus en plus répandues et efficaces des navigateurs et les clients de messagerie. Au lieu d'intégrer aux mails des liens HTML classiques vers des pages souvent blacklistées, les spammeurs "modernes" privilégieraient désormais les « attachements HTML ». M86, la firme de sécurité met en tout cas en garde contre la recrudescence de ces menaces. Les liens dans les mail pointent désormais vers des pages HTML jointe, qui contiennen...

    Read the article

  • Does your team develop their supporting tools or this should be outsourced out of it?

    - by Pierre 303
    By supporting tools, I mean: reference data manager, like virus definition for anti-virus software test data generator level builders for games simulators or advanced mocking systems Does the team building the core product (in the case above, the game or the anti-virus) should be part of the development of the supporting tools significantly, or this is a task you would outsourced out of the team to help it focus on the product? I don't have enough experience to evaluate the pros & cons of each, so I'm hopping you would come up with personal experiences to share, or even studies or papers you read on the subject.

    Read the article

  • Sécurité : Les machines tournant sous Windows XP vulnérables à une faille présente dans de nombreux

    Sécurité : Les machines tournant sous Windows XP vulnérables à une faille présente dans de nombreux anti-virus Il y a quelques jours, des chercheurs de Matousec.com ont publié une tactique d'attaque permettant de tromper les protections de la majorité des anti-virus. Un "sérieux" problème, d'après les spécialistes. Cette technique découverte, appelée "argument-switch attack", permettrait aux attaquants d'exploiter les hooks des drivers du noyau que la pluspart des logiciels de sécurité pour rerouter les appels du système Windows (à travers le programme, pour vérifier la présence éventuelle de codes malicieux). Un rapport propulsé par Matousec démontre de quelle manière il est possible de remplacer...

    Read the article

  • Les décideurs IT s'occupent-ils assez de la sécurité des terminaux nomades ? Un éditeur sort le classement des vols les plus insolites

    Absolute Software sort un classement des vols d'ordinateurs les plus insolites Les décideurs IT s'occupent-ils assez de la sécurité des terminaux nomades ? Absolute Software, spécialiste canadien des solutions anti-vols des ordinateurs portables, vient de publier une bien curieuse rétrospective de l'année 2010. L'entreprise dresse en effet le top 5 des histoires de vol les plus insolites de l'année, des histoires qui finissent bien, et ce, bien entendu, grâce à ses solutions anti-vols. L'histoire sacrée la plus insolite est celle d'un acheteur malchanceux qui acquière un ordinateur portable d'occasion ? volé. L'acheteur se rend chez un ami policier afin d'utiliser s...

    Read the article

  • Les décideurs IT s'occupent-ils assez de la sécurité des appareils nomades ? Absolute Software sort un classement des vols les plus insolites

    Absolute Software sort un classement des vols d'ordinateurs les plus insolites Les décideurs IT s'occupent-ils assez de la sécurité des terminaux nomades ? Absolute Software, spécialiste canadien des solutions anti-vols des ordinateurs portables, vient de publier une bien curieuse rétrospective de l'année 2010. L'entreprise dresse en effet le top 5 des histoires de vol les plus insolites de l'année, des histoires qui finissent bien, et ce, bien entendu, grâce à ses solutions anti-vols. L'histoire sacrée la plus insolite est celle d'un acheteur malchanceux qui acquière un ordinateur portable d'occasion ? volé. L'acheteur se rend chez un ami policier afin d'utiliser s...

    Read the article

  • Aucun antivirus ne résiste aux attaques lancées lors du concours de hackers Pwn2kill : les éditeurs

    Aucun antivirus ne résiste aux attaques Lancées lors du concours de hackers Pwn2kill : que font les éditeurs de sécurité ? Ce n'est pas tellement le constat qui est étonnant. Après tout, arriver à déjouer un anti-virus n'est pas nouveau. C'est plutôt la facilité avec laquelle la quasi-totalité des participants au concours Pwn2kill y sont arrivés qui pose problème. Comme le souligne l'organisateur du concours, Eric Filiol, dans le résumé des exploits du concours de hackers Pwn2kill, les attaques contre 15 anti-virus n'étaient pas particulièrement originales. Bien au contraire, elle étaient toutes connues et répertoriées depuis 2 à 10 ans. Certai...

    Read the article

  • How can robots beat CAPTCHAs?

    - by totymedli
    I have a website e-mail form. I use a custom CAPTCHA to prevent spam from robots. Despite this, I still get spam. Why? How do robots beat the CAPTCHA? Do they use some kind of advanced OCR or just get the solution from where it is stored? How can I prevent this? Should I change to another type of CAPTCHA? I am sure the e-mails are coming from the form, because it is sent from my email-sender that serves the form messages. Also the letter style is the same. For the record, I am using PHP + MySQL, but I'm not searching for a solution to this problem. I was interested in the general situation how the robots beat these technologies. I just told this situation as an example, so you can understand better what I'm asking about.

    Read the article

  • Sometimes big delay when using PHP mail()

    - by Robbert Dam
    I have a website which processes orders from a Windows application. This works as follows: User clicks "Order now" in the windows app App uploads a file with POST to a PHP script The script immediately calls the PHP mail() function (order is not stored in a db) This works fine most of the time. However, sometimes a big delay occurs (several days). Customers calls why the product has not yet been delivered. E-mail headers of delayed mail follows: Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0 Received: from barracuda.nkl.nl ([10.0.0.1]) by smtp.nkl.nl with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 26 May 2010 16:26:51 +0200 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1274883818-2f8800000000-X58hIK X-Barracuda-URL: http://10.0.0.1:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from server45.firstfind.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by barracuda.nkl.nl (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id ECAFD15776A for <[email protected]>; Wed, 26 May 2010 16:23:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from server45.firstfind.nl (server45.firstfind.nl [93.94.226.76]) by barracuda.nkl.nl with ESMTP id 85bAT2AU58kkxjPb for <[email protected]>; Wed, 26 May 2010 16:23:38 +0200 (CEST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: [email protected] Received: from server45.firstfind.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server45.firstfind.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3+etch1) with ESMTP id o4QEM3Hb004301 for <[email protected]>; Wed, 26 May 2010 16:23:31 +0200 Received: (from nklsemin@localhost) by server45.firstfind.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id o4J9lA7M031307; Wed, 19 May 2010 11:47:10 +0200 Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 11:47:10 +0200 Message-Id: <[email protected]> To: [email protected] X-ASG-Orig-Subj: easyfit - ref: Hoen3443 Subject: easyfit - ref: Hoen3443 X-PHP-Script: www.nklseminar.nl/emailer/upload.php for 77.61.220.217 From: [email protected] Content-type: text/html X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Barracuda-Connect: server45.firstfind.nl[93.94.226.76] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1274883820 X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.0000 1.0000 -2.0210 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at nkl.nl X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.92 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.92 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=2.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=3.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_96_XX, DATE_IN_PAST_96_XX_2, HTML_MESSAGE, MIME_HEADER_CTYPE_ONLY, MIME_HTML_ONLY, NO_REAL_NAME X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.30817 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name 0.01 DATE_IN_PAST_96_XX Date: is 96 hours or more before Received: date 0.00 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.86 MIME_HEADER_CTYPE_ONLY 'Content-Type' found without required MIME headers 2.07 DATE_IN_PAST_96_XX_2 DATE_IN_PAST_96_XX_2 Return-Path: [email protected] X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 May 2010 14:26:51.0343 (UTC) FILETIME=[7B80DDF0:01CAFCDF] The delay seems to occur here: Received: from server45.firstfind.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server45.firstfind.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3+etch1) with ESMTP id o4QEM3Hb004301 for <[email protected]>; Wed, 26 May 2010 16:23:31 +0200 Received: (from nklsemin@localhost) by server45.firstfind.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id o4J9lA7M031307; Wed, 19 May 2010 11:47:10 +0200 I've reported this issue various times to the web hosting service that hosts my website. They say the delay does not occur in their network (impossible). But they do confirm that the e-mail is first seen in their mail server on May 26, which is 7 days after the mail has been composed. The order is marked with the timestamp of the user's local PC, which also matches May 19 (so it's not a PC clock problem) It's also interesting to see that all delayed mails (orders were placed on different days) come in at once. So I suddenly receive 14 e-mail in my mailbox from various days. Any idea were this delay may be introduced? Could there be a bug in my PHP code that causes this? (I cannot believe I can introduce a loop of 7 days in my PHP code)

    Read the article

  • external postfix forwarding to zimbra server

    - by Marko
    I want to migrate from my current mail server (old_server) for my domain mydomain.com. old_server setup is Postfix+LDAP+Cyrus. Now I want to migrate my domain mail to Zimbra server (zimbra), but I am considering option to leave current mail server working in the first phase, and then to only have subset of email addresses to be forwarded to zimbra server. It seems that zimbra refers this in their documentation as 'edge MTA'. Current config mydomain.com MX: old_server <---------- smtp send ----------> smtp receive New config mydomain.com MX: old_server zimbra <------------------------------------------- smtp send ----------> smtp receive ---- forward ----> smtp receive I need following: old_server to receive mail for my domain as before, but for some of the email addresses I want them to be delivered to zimbra server. I should be able to determine which email addresses will be forwarded. I would like to avoid possible false spam detections for mails from mydomain.com due to this setup. Questions: How should I configure postfix on old_server to support this mail forwarding? To avoid false spam detection, can I have outgoing mail from mydomain.com to be sent by zimbra or should I use old_server? Is there anything extra I would need to do in order to avoid possibility of my outgoing mails being marked as spam on other servers?

    Read the article

  • Better logging for cronjob output using /usr/bin/logger

    - by Stefan Lasiewski
    I am looking for a better way to log cronjobs. Most cronjobs tend to spam email or the console, get ignored, or create yet another logfile. In this case, I have a Nagios NSCA script which sends data to a central Nagios sever. This send_nsca script also prints a single status line to STDOUT, indicating success or failure. 0 * * * * root /usr/local/nagios/sbin/nsca_check_disk This emails the following message to root@localhost, which is then forwarded to my team of sysadmins. Spam. forwarded nsca_check_disk: 1 data packet(s) sent to host successfully. I'm looking for a log method which: Doesn't spam the messages to email or the console Don't create yet another krufty logfile which requires cleanup months or years later. Capture the log information somewhere, so it can be viewed later if desired. Works on most unixes Fits into an existing log infrastructure. Uses common syslog conventions like 'facility' Some of these are third party scripts, and don't always do logging internally. UPDATE 2010-04-30 In the process of writing this question, I think I have answered myself. So I'll answer myself "Jeopardy-style". Is there any problem with this method? The following will send any Cron output to /usr/bin//logger, which will send to syslog, with a 'tag' of 'nsca_check_disk'. Syslog handles it from there. My systems (CentOS and FreeBSD) already handle log rotation. */5 * * * * root /usr/local/nagios/sbin/nsca_check_disk 2>&1 |/usr/bin/logger -t nsca_check_disk /var/log/messages now has one additional message which says this: Apr 29, 17:40:00 192.168.6.19 nsca_check_disk: 1 data packet(s) sent to host successfully. I like /usr/bin/logger , because it works well with an existing syslog configuration and infrastructure, and is included with most Unix distros. Most *nix distributions already do logrotation, and do it well.

    Read the article

  • Plesk: Spamassassin ignores emails to redirected accounts

    - by Mat
    When I set up email redirects within Plesk 9.5, Spamassassin ignores all emails sent to the redirected address and only scans emails that are sent directly to the address which has a mailbox. Steps to reproduce Set up two mail accounts: [email protected] as a proper email account with a mailbox and [email protected] with all emails redirected to [email protected]. (It doesn't make a difference, if [email protected] has a mailbox enabled or not.) [email protected] -> [email protected] Set up the spam filter on both accounts. I set mine to delete spam right away, but you can just keep the default ("mark as spam"). Now, when you send an emails to [email protected], it will have Spamassassins tags in the email header, but when you send emails to [email protected], they will end up in the same mailbox but will have no spamassassin tags in the emails header and they will not be scanned. Other notes I am using Plesk 9.5.4 on Ubuntu 8.04 LTS with the default Qmail. I've observed this bug since Plesk 8, but I can't stand it any more and would appreciate any hack or fix.

    Read the article

  • Can sendmail be configured to discard routed email that has been rejected by the next hop?

    - by Guy Bolton King
    Background: We have a handful of hosts (running sendmail) acting as the MXs for a few domains each. Each domain is handled via the sendmail/cf /etc/mail/virtusertable, with a set of known recipients and a catch-all reject rule. Mail to postmaster on each host is aliased to root, and root is aliased to root+<host>@ourdomain.com. The MX for ourdomain.com is Google Apps, and [email protected] is a simple group that forwards to the admins. Google Apps will reject some emails at the SMTP stage, usually because of illegal attachments (instead of accepting them and filing them as spam). Problem: Given a particular spam email sent to a domain in a virtusertable entry: If the recipient address rejects the mail, then sendmail will try and send a DSN to the sender. If that sender also rejects the mail (because it's a falsified sender, and the MX for the sender rejects the mail as spam), then sendmail sends a DSN to the postmaster. The routing detailed above takes place, and...Google Apps rejects the mail as well. sendmail now gives up with a "savemail panic", and leaves the mail in the queue forever. Our mail queue fills up with garbage Is there any way I can get sendmail to discard messages that have been rejected by the next virtusertable hop (i.e. after step 1 in the Problem description)? Or does anyone have any other solutions to this?

    Read the article

  • Sending 10,000 emails?

    - by Philipp Lenssen
    (I don't know whether to submit this to SuperUser or StackOverflow.) My friend and I have a subscriber list -- strictly opt-in, for people interested when we release new projects -- and we may want to send out a first email this year. How would one best send an email to over 10,000 people? Perhaps there is a good, I suppose paid service, which would do this for one? The key being that the emails ought arrive, with good chances of not being immediately labeled as spam due to the sender or something (as it's definitely not spam). When I simply send emails from my 1&1 server, they often immediately make it into the spam folder, even though when sending the same email through say Google Appspot, it arrives fine. FWIW, the email addresses are not yet verified (people simply signed up for the list by providing an email, and optionally a name). Analyzing what bounced may be a pro. BTW, we will provide an opt-out link with every mail. Thanks for any pointers, and sorry if this doesn't fit to ServerFault 100%!

    Read the article

  • how to replace latex macros with their definitions (using latex)

    - by RamyenHead
    How can I replace all occurrence of user defined latex macros with their definitions? For example, given this file old.tex \newcommand{\blah}[2]{#1 \to #2} ... foo \blah{egg}{spam} bar ... how to generate the file below in an automatic way new.tex ... foo egg \to spam bar ... Instead of reimplementing latex macro logic with perl, can I use latex or tex engine itself to do this?

    Read the article

  • How to implement DomainKeys?

    - by jmutaka
    Can any one gave me requirements/step-by-step procedures on how am I suppose to create DomainKeys for my mail server so that our email can pass through on Yahoo!'s mail server without being marked as spam or bulk mail? I think implementing DomainKeys is one of the requirements of Yahoo! Mail to not have email marked as spam. Our mail server is hmailserver.

    Read the article

  • How do I require that an element has either one set of attributes or another in an XSD schema?

    - by Eli Courtwright
    I'm working with an XML document where a tag must either have one set of attributes or another. For example, it needs to either look like <tag foo="hello" bar="kitty" /> or <tag spam="goodbye" eggs="world" /> e.g. <root> <tag foo="hello" bar="kitty" /> <tag spam="goodbye" eggs="world" /> </root> So I have an XSD schema where I use the xs:choice element to choose between two different attribute groups: <xsi:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" attributeFormDefault="unqualified" elementFormDefault="qualified"> <xs:element name="root"> <xs:complexType> <xs:sequence> <xs:element maxOccurs="unbounded" name="tag"> <xs:choice> <xs:complexType> <xs:attribute name="foo" type="xs:string" use="required" /> <xs:attribute name="bar" type="xs:string" use="required" /> </xs:complexType> <xs:complexType> <xs:attribute name="spam" type="xs:string" use="required" /> <xs:attribute name="eggs" type="xs:string" use="required" /> </xs:complexType> </xs:choice> </xs:element> </xs:sequence> </xs:complexType> </xs:element> </xsi:schema> However, when using lxml to attempt to load this schema, I get the following error: >>> from lxml import etree >>> etree.XMLSchema( etree.parse("schema_choice.xsd") ) Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> File "xmlschema.pxi", line 85, in lxml.etree.XMLSchema.__init__ (src/lxml/lxml.etree.c:118685) lxml.etree.XMLSchemaParseError: Element '{http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema}element': The content is not valid. Expected is (annotation?, ((simpleType | complexType)?, (unique | key | keyref)*))., line 7 Since the error is with the placement of my xs:choice element, I've tried putting it in different places, but no matter what I try, I can't seem to use it to define a tag to have either one set of attributes (foo and bar) or another (spam and eggs). Is this even possible? And if so, then what is the correct syntax?

    Read the article

  • SEO for Computer Software Engineering Topics

    - by Michael Aaron Safyan
    I'm currently trying to SEO my development and coding search custom search engine as well my website that has a variety of coding and development resources. I would like to increase the number of links to my website, but I don't want to simply generate spam. What are some places that I should submit my website, where the content would be considered relevant rather than just spam? Thanks.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46  | Next Page >