Search Results

Search found 17036 results on 682 pages for 'mysql administrator'.

Page 393/682 | < Previous Page | 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400  | Next Page >

  • problem with logout script in php

    - by user225269
    I'm a beginner in php, and I am trying to create a login and logout. But I am having problems in logging out. My logout just calls for the login form which is this: <? session_start(); session_destroy(); ?> <table width="300" border="0" align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="1" bgcolor="#CCCCCC"> <tr> <form name="form1" method="post" action="checklogin.php"> <td> <table width="100%" border="0" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> <tr> <td colspan="3"><strong>Member Login </strong></td> </tr> <tr> <td width="78">Username</td> <td width="6">:</td> <td width="294"><input name="myusername" type="text" id="myusername"></td> </tr> <tr> <td>Password</td> <td>:</td> <td><input name="mypassword" type="text" id="mypassword"></td> </tr> <tr> <td>&nbsp;</td> <td>&nbsp;</td> <td><input type="submit" name="Submit" value="Login"></td> </tr> </table> </td> </form> </tr> </table> My problem is, when I try to press the back button in the browser. Whoever user is using it can still access what is not supposed to be accessed when a user hasn't logged in. Do I need to add a code on the user page? I have this code on the user page: <? session_start(); if(!session_is_registered(myusername)){ header("location:main_login.php"); } ?> What can you recommend that I would do so that a script will prompt to enter the username and password again when a user clicks on the back button.

    Read the article

  • How can an SQL query return data from multiple tables

    - by Fluffeh
    I would like to know how to get data from multiple tables in my database, what types of methods are there to do this, what are joins and unions and how are they different from one another? When should I use each one compared to the others? I am planning to use this in my (for example - PHP) application, but don't want to run multiple queries against the database, what options do I have to get data from multiple tables in a single query? Note: I am writing this as I would like to be able to link to a well written guide on the numerous questions that I constantly come across in the PHP queue, so I can link to this for further detail when I post an answer. The answers cover off the following: Part 1 - Joins and Unions Part 2 - Subqueries Part 3 - Tricks and Efficient Code

    Read the article

  • Confused as to why my PHP include isn't working

    - by Sam
    I had a prototype of my website working correctly, meaning it connected to the database correctly. This was done with just one file called "connect.php" which had mysql_connect() and such inside it. I then separated the connect information into to separate files, one containing the account information (account.php) and one containing the connect function (connect.php), with correct information (I triple checked) and it isn't connecting properly. All I can think of is that I'm not including it the right way. This is what I have in a file: <?php include('account.php'); include('connect.php'); include('functions.php'); ..... ?>

    Read the article

  • Wordpress SQL_CALC fix causes PHP error

    - by ok1ha
    I'm looking for some followup on an older topic for Wordpress where SQL_CALC was found to slow things down when you have a large DB in Wordpress. I have been using the code, at the bottom of this post, to get around it but it does generate an error in my error log. How would I prevent this error? PHP Warning: Division by zero in /var/www/vhosts/domain.com/httpdocs/wp-content/themes/greatTheme/functions.php on line 19 The original thread: http://wordpress.org/support/topic/slow-queries-sql_calc_found_rows-bringing-down-site?replies=25 The code in my functions.php: add_filter('pre_get_posts', 'optimized_get_posts', 100); function optimized_get_posts() { global $wp_query, $wpdb; $wp_query->query_vars['no_found_rows'] = 1; $wp_query->found_posts = $wpdb->get_var( "SELECT COUNT(*) FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND wp_posts.post_type = 'post' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish' OR wp_posts.post_status = 'private')" ); $wp_query->found_posts = apply_filters_ref_array( 'found_posts', array( $wp_query->found_posts, &$wp_query ) ); $wp_query->max_num_pages = ceil($wp_query->found_posts / $wp_query->query_vars['posts_per_page']); return $wp_query; }

    Read the article

  • Is this SQL is valid?

    - by Beck
    UPDATE polls_options SET `votes`=`votes`+1, `percent`=ROUND((`votes`+1) / (SELECT voters FROM polls WHERE poll_id=? LIMIT 1) * 100,1) WHERE option_id=? AND poll_id=? Don't have table data yet, to test it properly. :) And by the way, in what type % integers should be stored in database? Thanks for the help!

    Read the article

  • checkbox checked with php form post?

    - by Patrick
    how do I check a checkbox? I've tried 1, On, Yes that doesn't work. putting the worked "checked" alone works but then how do I check with php after form post of the checkbox is checked? <input type="checkbox" class="inputcheckbox" id="newmsg" name=chk[newmsg2] value="1" />

    Read the article

  • How to properly design a simple favorites and blocked table?

    - by Nils Riedemann
    Hey, i am currently writing a webapp in rails where users can mark items as favorites and also block them. I came up two ways and wondered which one is more common/better way. 1. Separate join tables Would it be wise to have 2 tables for this? Like: users_favorites - user_id - item_id users_blocked - user_id - item_id 2. single table users_marks (or so) - users_id - item_id - type (["fav", "blk"]) Both ways seem to have advantages. Which one would you use and why?

    Read the article

  • laravel multiple where clauses within a loop

    - by user1424508
    Pretty much I want the query to select all records of users that are 25 years old AND are either between 150-170cm OR 190-200cm. I have this query written down below. However the problem is it keeps getting 25 year olds OR people who are 190-200cm instead of 25 year olds that are 150-170 OR 25 year olds that 190-200cm tall. How can I fix this? thanks $heightarray=array(array(150,170),array(190,200)); $user->where('age',25); for($i=0;$i<count($heightarray);i++){ if($i==0){ $user->whereBetween('height',$heightarray[$i]) }else{ $user->orWhereBetween('height',$heightarray[$i]) } } $user->get(); Edit: I tried advanced wheres (http://laravel.com/docs/queries#advanced-wheres) and it doesn't work for me as I cannot pass the $heightarray parameter into the closure. from laravel documentation DB::table('users') ->where('name', '=', 'John') ->orWhere(function($query) { $query->where('votes', '>', 100) ->where('title', '<>', 'Admin'); }) ->get();

    Read the article

  • Want to avoid the particular rows from select join query... See description

    - by OM The Eternity
    I have a Select Left Join Query whis displays me the rows for the latest changedone(its a time) column name ("field" should not be equal) column name ("trackid" should not be equal), and column name "Operation should be "UPDATE" ", below is the query I am talking about... SELECT j1. * FROM jos_audittrail j1 LEFT OUTER JOIN jos_audittrail j2 ON ( j1.trackid != j2.trackid AND j1.field != j2.field AND j1.changedone < j2.changedone ) WHERE j1.operation = 'UPDATE' AND j2.id IS NULL Now here I don't want a row to be displayed with a two particular column's value i.e. "field's value" the value is "LastvisitDate" and "hits" Now if if append the condition in the above query that " AND j1.field != 'lastvistDate' AND j1.field != 'hits' " theni do not get any result... The table structure is jos_audittrail: id trackid operation oldvalue newvalue table_name live changedone(its a time) I hope i have given the details properly If u still find something missing I will try to provide it more better way... Pls help me to avoid those two rows with those to mentioned value of "field"

    Read the article

  • The best way to structure this database?

    - by James P
    At the moment I'm doing this: gems(id, name, colour, level, effects, source) id is the primary key and is not auto-increment. A typical row of data would look like this: id => 40153 name => Veiled Ametrine colour => Orange level => 80 effects => +12 sp, +10 hit source => Ametrine (Some of you gamers might see what I'm doing here :) ) But I realise this could be sorted a lot better. I have studied database relationships and secondary keys in my A-Level computing class but never got as far as to set one up properly. I just need help with how this database should be organised, like what tables should have what data with what secondary and foreign keys? I was thinking maybe 3 tables: gem, effects, source. Which then have relationships to each other? Can anyone shed some light on this? Is a complex way like I'm proposing really the way to go or should I just carry on with what I'm doing? Cheers.

    Read the article

  • problems with inserting data in database

    - by jannes braet
    $message=$_POST['answer']; $message=nl2br($message); $message=strip_tags($message, '<p><a><b><i><strong><em><code><sub><sup><img><ul><ol><li>'); $message = mysql_real_escape_string($message); $user=$_SESSION['SESS_MEMBER_ID']; $qry="INSERT INTO forum_rules (message,author,date) VALUES ($message,$user,'".date("Y-m-d H:i:s")."')"; $result=mysql_query($qry) or die(mysql_error()); if (!$result) { echo "error inserting data into database"; } else { ... } this codes always outputs error inserting data into database and i don't see what i'm doing wrong. i hav also tried to do it without the date part but that didn't work tho. can someone please tell me what i'm doing wrong here

    Read the article

  • How can I fake sql data while preserving statements without commenting my server-side code?

    - by Fedor
    I have to use hardcoded values for certain fields because at this moment we don't have access to the real data. When we do get access, I don't want to go through a lot of work uncommenting. Is it possible to keep this statement the way it is, except use '25' as the alias for ratecode? IF(special.ratecode IS NULL, br.ratecode, special.ratecode) AS ratecode, I have about 8 or so IF statements similar to this and I'm just too lazy ( even with vim ) to re-append while commenting out each if statement line by line. I would have to do this: $sql = 'SELECT u.*,'; // IF ( special.ratecode IS NULL, br.ratecode, special.ratecode) AS ratecode $sql.= '25 AS ratecode';

    Read the article

  • differentiating results of sql right join

    - by Sourabh
    Hi I have a below SQL query SELECT `User`.`username` , Permalink.perma_link_id, Permalink.locale, Permalink.title, DATEDIFF( CURDATE( ) , Permalink.created ) AS dtdiff, `TargetSegment`.segment_text, TargetSegment.source_segment_id ,TargetSegment.perma_link_id ,TargetSegment.created ,TargetSegment.updated, DATEDIFF( CURDATE( ) , TargetSegment.updated ) AS datediff FROM `users` AS `User` RIGHT JOIN perma_links AS `PermaLink` ON ( `PermaLink`.`username` = `User`.`username` ) RIGHT JOIN target_segments AS `TargetSegment` ON ( `TargetSegment`.`username` = `User`.`username` ) RIGHT JOIN source_segments AS `SourceSegment` ON ( `SourceSegment`.`source_detail_id` = `PermaLink`.`source_detail_id` ) LEFT JOIN source_details AS `SourceDetail` ON ( `SourceSegment`.`source_detail_id` = `SourceDetail`.`id` ) WHERE `TargetSegment`.`username` = "xxxx" AND `TargetSegment`.`segment_text` <> "" AND `Permalink`.`perma_link_id` = `TargetSegment`.`perma_link_id` AND `TargetSegment`.`source_segment_id` = `SourceSegment`.`id` AND `Permalink`.`source_detail_id` = `SourceDetail`.`id` ORDER BY `TargetSegment`.`updated` DESC LIMIT 0 , 10 This SQL is fetching correct results for me.I want to identify from which table each row if from , to be specific which result is due to PermaLink table and which is from TargetSegment table. is this achievable ?

    Read the article

  • Simple PHP query question: LIKE

    - by pg
    When I replace $ordering = "apples, bananas, cranberries, grapes"; with $ordering = "apples, bananas, grapes"; I no longer want cranberries to be returned by my query, which I've written out like this: $query = "SELECT * from dbname where FruitName LIKE '$ordering'"; Of Course this doesn't work, because I used LIKE wrong. I've read through various manuals that describe how to use LIKE and it doesn't quite make sense to me. If I change the end of the db to "LIKE "apples"" that works for limiting it to just apples. Do I have to explode the ordering on the ", " or is there a way to do this in the query?

    Read the article

  • Error during data UPDATE in php

    - by Piyush
    $sql = "UPDATE tblprofile SET name = '$membername' , f_h_name = '$fathername', maritalS = '$mstatus' , dob = '$dob' , occupation = '$occupation' , nominee = '$nominee' , address1 = '$address1' , address2 = '$address2', city = '$city', district = '$district', state = '$state', pin = '$areapin', mobile = '$mobileno', email = '$email', PANno = '$panno', bankname = '$bankname', branch = '$branch', accountno = '$accountno' WHERE userId = '$_SESSION['UserId']' "; //line 212 if(mysql_query($sql)) { echo "Updation Done."; } Error comes in browser : Parse error: syntax error, unexpected T_ENCAPSED_AND_WHITESPACE, expecting T_STRING or T_VARIABLE or T_NUM_STRING in C:\xampp\htdocs\303\saveEditProfile.php on line 212

    Read the article

  • Django database - how to add this column in raw SQL.

    - by alex
    Suppose I have my models set up already. class books(models.Model): title = models.CharField... ISBN = models.Integer... What if I want to add this column to my table? user = models.ForeignKey(User, unique=True) How would I write the raw SQL in my database so that this column works?

    Read the article

  • Problem with joining to an empty table

    - by Imran Omar Bukhsh
    I use the following query: select * from A LEFT JOIN B on ( A.t_id != B.t_id) to get all the records in A that are not in B. The results are fine except when table B is completely empty, but then I do not get any records, even from table A. Later It wont work yet! CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS T1 ( id int(11) unsigned NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, title varchar(50) CHARACTER SET utf8 COLLATE utf8_unicode_ci NOT NULL, t_id int(11) NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (id) ) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1 AUTO_INCREMENT=3 ; -- -- Dumping data for table T1 INSERT INTO T1 (id, title, t_id) VALUES (1, 'apple', 1), (2, 'orange', 2); -- -- Table structure for table T2 CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS T2 ( id int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, title varchar(50) CHARACTER SET utf8 COLLATE utf8_unicode_ci NOT NULL, t_id int(11) NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (id) ) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1 AUTO_INCREMENT=2 ; -- -- Dumping data for table T2 INSERT INTO T2 (id, title, t_id) VALUES (1, 'dad', 2); Now I want to get all records in T1 that do not have a corresponding records in T2 I try SELECT * FROM T1 LEFT OUTER JOIN T2 ON T1.t_id != T2.t_id and it won't work

    Read the article

  • How to skip an empty LIKE operator in a multiple LIKE query?

    - by alex
    I notice my query doesn't behave correctly if one of the like variables is empty: SELECT name FROM employee WHERE name LIKE '%a%' AND color LIKE '%A%' AND city LIKE '%b%' AND country LIKE '%B%' AND sport LIKE '%c%' AND hobby LIKE '%C%' Now when a and A are not empty it works but when a, A and c are not empty the c part is not excuted so it seems? How can I fix this?

    Read the article

  • Query sql on string

    - by simone
    hi all, I have a db with users that have all this record . I would like to do a query on a data like CN=aaa, OU=Domain,OU=User, OU=bbbbbb,OU=Department, OU=cccc, OU=AUTO, DC=dddddd, DC=com and I need to group all users by the same ou=department. How can I do the select with the substring to search a department?? My idea for the solution is to create another table that is like this: --------------------------------------------------- ldapstring | society | site --------------------------------------------------- "CN=aaa, OU=Domain,OU=User, OU=bbbbbb,OU=Department, OU=cccc, OU=AUTO, DC=dddddd, DC=com" | societyName1 | societySite1 and my idea is to compare the string with these on the new table with the tag like but how can I take the society and site when the like string occurs????? Please help me

    Read the article

  • Separating Variables Inside an Array

    - by Jake Avila Talledo
    Hey i have an array an I need to separate each value so it would be something like this $arry = array(a,b,c,d,e,f) $point1 = (SELECT distance FROM Table WHERE Origin = a AND Destination = b); $point2 = (SELECT distance FROM Table WHERE Origin = b AND Destination = c); $point3 = (SELECT distance FROM Table WHERE Origin = c AND Destination = d); $point4 = (SELECT distance FROM Table WHERE Origin = d AND Destination = e); $point5 = (SELECT distance FROM Table WHERE Origin = e AND Destination = f); $point6 = (SELECT distance FROM Table WHERE Origin = f AND Destination = g); $point7 = (SELECT distance FROM Table WHERE Origin = g AND Destination = f); $total_trav = $point1+$point2+$point3+$point4+$point5+$point6+$point7

    Read the article

  • Archiving rows dynamically

    - by Serge
    I was wondering what would be the best solution to dynamically archive rows. For instance when a user marks a task as completed, that task needs to be archived yet still accessible. What would be the best practices for achieving this? Should I just leave it all in the same table and leave out completed tasks from the queries? I'm afraid that over time the table will become huge (1,000,000 rows in a year or less). Or should I create another table ie task_archive and query that row whenever data is needed from it? I know similar questions have been asked before but most of them where about archiving thousands of rows simultaneously, I just need to know what would be the best method (and why) to archive 1 row at a time once it's been marked completed

    Read the article

  • select distinct over specific columns

    - by Midhat
    A query in a system I maintain returns QID AID DATA 1 2 x 1 2 y 5 6 t As per a new requirement, I do not want the (QID, AID)=(1,2) pair to be repeated. We also dont care what value is selected from "data" column. either x or y will do. What I have done is to enclose the original query like this SELECT * FROM (<original query text>) Results group by QID,AID Is there a better way to go about this? The original query uses multiple joins and unions and what not, So I would prefer not to touch it unless its absolutely necesary

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400  | Next Page >