Search Results

Search found 11284 results on 452 pages for 'blueprint css'.

Page 4/452 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

  • CSS Caching and User-CUstomized CSS - Any Suggestions?

    - by Joe
    I'm just trying to figure out the best approach here... my consideration is that I'd like my users to be able to customize the colors of certain elements on the page. These are not pre-made css they can choose from, but rather styles that can be edited using javascript to change the style, so they cannot be "pre-made" into separate style sheets. I am also generating the css into a cache directory since I am generating the css through a PHP script. I am thinking that, perhaps I should: 1) If cached css file doesn't exist, create css file using the website default style settings. 2) If cached css file does exist, check if user has custom settings, if so, edit the cache file before displaying it. Btw, when I refer to "cached file" I mean the PHP generated css document. My goal is to prevent the need to have PHP re-generate the css file each time, whilst still allowing users, when logged in, to have their customized css settings applied. I will store these settings in a database most likely so when they return it is saved for them when they login.

    Read the article

  • Is it correct that blueprint css allows you to formulate your layout as a grid instead of in terms o

    - by brian
    One of the arguments I've heard about blueprint css is that it lets you think of your layout in terms of a grid rather than in terms of floats. This seems like a big advantage to me because I always get confused about where my floats are going to end up - sometimes a float will unexpectedly drop down below some other floats and I have a hard time figuring out how to reposition everything. Does this make blueprint css a good choice for me - or should I just put the time in to learn how to use floats properly and do all of my layouts manually?

    Read the article

  • I want to use 960 or Blueprint, but I also want to use lots of Padding and Borders, is it a good fit

    - by viatropos
    I started using 960 today and thought it would be really easy. However, trying to translate a site to 960 quickly proved tough for many reasons. The first is that I can't use any padding or borders. Unless of course I add many more divs. Same thing with borders. Question is, if I want to use lots of padding and borders (where padding and borders are either 5px "thin" or 10px "thick" styles), are 960 and blueprint overkill? It seems pretty easy to create a custom grid, but once I add padding and borders, 99% of the work is making sure the grid doesn't break. I still am going to end up lining everything up to a 960 grid with 12 columns, but I want to have padding and borders included in the width, and it seems that's not easily possible with 960 or blueprint. What are your thoughts?

    Read the article

  • How Flask loads blueprint internaly?

    - by Ignas B.
    I'm just interested how Flask's blueprints gets imported. It still imports the python module at the end of all the stuff done by Flask and if I'm right python does two things when importing: registers the module name in the namespace and then initialize it if needed. So if Flask blueprint is initialized when it gets registered, so all the module then is in memory and if there are lots of blueprints to register, the memory just gets wasted, because in one request basically you use one blueprint. Not a big loss but still... But if it is only registered in the namespace and initialized only when needed (when the real request reaches it), then it make sense to register them all at once (as is the recommended way I understood). This is I guess the case here :) But just wanted to ask and understand a bit deeper.

    Read the article

  • Reduce HTTP Requests method for js and css

    - by Giberno
    Is these way can Reduce HTTP Requests? multiple javascript files with & symbol <script type="text/javascript" src="http://yui.yahooapis.com/combo?2.5.2/build/yahoo-dom-event/yahoo-dom-event.js &http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.4.2/jquery.min.js"> </script> multiple css files with @ import <style type="text/css"> @import url(css/style.css); @import url(css/custom.css); </style>

    Read the article

  • CSS files that don't end with .css

    - by Yongho
    Is there a disadvantage to using a dynamic Python file to generate the CSS for a webpage? I'd like computers with an administrator cookie to show special admin panel CSS, and show regular CSS for all other users. I'm planning to use: <link rel="stylesheet" href="/css.py" type="text/css" />

    Read the article

  • Reset.css and then a Set.css

    - by Sixfoot Studio
    I have, for a while now been using a reset.css file to reset everything before I start laying out my html designs. The reset is great in that it allows one to better control attributes such as margins, padding, line-height etc for all browsers. In essence the flatliner of css files. Now to get the heart beating again, I need a "set.css" file. So what I have done is created an Html file with all the possible elements on the page to then go and set the padding, margins etc of the h1, h2, p, td etc. I need some help with this as I am not sure what the defaults normally are. I had a look at the Firefox default css file that's used to generate all these attributes on a raw html file but it doesn't cover all the scenarios I could come up with when developing a site. Here's an example of the set.html file (a work in progress) which can be used as a lorem ipsum filler to add to your first page in a cms and then to style with a "set.css" file http://www.sixfoot.co.za/labs/Html-Css/set.html I'd appreciate it if someone knows if something like a set.css file exists or if someone could tell me what the general padding and margins are in cases like this when you have reset the css. Cheers, James

    Read the article

  • What is the correct usage of blueprint-typography-body([$font-size])?

    - by Alexis Abril
    Recent convert to RoR and I've been using Compass w/ Blueprint to dip into the proverbial pool. Compass has been fantastic, but I've come across something strange within the Typography library. The blueprint-typography-body mixin contains the following: =blueprint-typography-body($font-size: $blueprint-font-size) line-height: 1.5 +normal-text font-size: 100% * $font-size / 16px My question revolves around "font-size." I'm a bit lost, as I would expect to pass in a font size and have that size reflected upon page load. However, in this scenario the formula seems to dictate a percentage against the default font. ie: +blueprint-typography-body(10px) //produces 7.5px off of the default font size of 12px from what I can tell. In essence, I'm curious if there is a standard to setting font size within Compass other than explicitly declaring "font-size: 10px". Note: The reason I'm leaning towards Blueprint/Compass font stylings is due to the standardization of line-heights, fonts and colors.

    Read the article

  • rails + compass: advantages vs using haml + blueprint directly

    - by egarcia
    I've got some experience using haml (+sass) on rails projects. I recently started using them with blueprintcss - the only thing I did was transform blueprint.css into a sass file, and started coding from there. I even have a rails generator that includes all this by default. It seems that Compass does what I do, and other things. I'm trying to understand what those other things are - but the documentation/tutorials weren't very clear. These are my conclusions: Compass comes with built-in sass mixins that implement common CSS idioms, such as links with icons or horizontal lists. My solution doesn't provide anything like that. (1 point for Compass). Compass has several command-line options: you can create a rails project, but you can also "install" it on an existing rails project. A rails generator could be personalized to do the same thing, I guess. (Tie). Compass has two modes of working with blueprint: "basic" and "semantic" usage. I'm not clear about the differences between those. With my rails generator I only have one mode, but it seems enough. (Tie) Apparently, Compass is prepared to use other frameworks, besides blueprint (e.g. YUI). I could not find much documentation about this, and I'm not interested on it anyway - blueprint is ok for me (Tie). Compass' learning curve seems a bit stiff and the documentation seems sparse. Learning could be a bit difficult. On the other hand, I know the ins and outs of my own system and can use it right away. (1 point for my system). With this analysis, I'm hesitant to give Compass a try. Is my analysis correct? Are Am I missing any key points, or have I evaluated any of these points wrongly?

    Read the article

  • how to place last div into right top corner of parent div? (css)

    - by Radek
    can I somehow using css place the block2 in right top corner of block1? Note that block2 must be the (very) last inside html code of block1 or it could be placed after block1. I cannot make it the first element in block1 <html> <head> <style type="text/css"> .block1 {color:red;width:100px;border:1px solid green;} .block2 {color:blue;width:70px;border:2px solid black;position:relative;} </style> </head> <body> <div class='block1'> <p>text</p> <p>text2</p> <div class='block2'>block2</DIV> </div> </body> </html>

    Read the article

  • how to place last div into right top corner of partent div? (css)

    - by Radek
    can I somehow using css place the block2 in right top corner of block1? Note that block2 must be the (very) last inside html code of block1 or it could be placed after block1. I cannot make it the first element in block1 <html> <head> <style type="text/css"> .block1 {color:red;width:100px;border:1px solid green;} .block2 {color:blue;width:70px;border:2px solid black;position:relative;} </style> </head> <body> <div class='block1'> <p>text</p> <p>text2</p> <div class='block2'>block2</DIV> </div> </body> </html>

    Read the article

  • Blueprint CSS - problem

    - by user319702
    Hi All, I'm using Blueprint as my CSS framework in my rails project. But currently i'm having a problem as when i created a link it shows both the link and display text in the web page Ex : say i have 'go to google' in my web page (view) it shows both "go to google (http://www.google.com)" where as i want to show only 'go to google' can someone tell me how to fix this, thanks in advance cheers, sameera

    Read the article

  • Javascript or CSS hover not working in Safari and Chrome

    - by PAZtech
    I have a problem with a script for a image gallery. The problem seems to only occur on Safari and Chrome, but if I refresh the page I get it to work correctly - weird! Correct function: The gallery has a top bar, which if you hover over it, it will display a caption. Below sits the main image. At the bottom there is another bar that is a reversal of the top bar. When you hover over it, it will display thumbnails of the gallery. The problem: In Safari and Chrome, the thumbnail holder will not display. In fact, it doesn't even show it as an active item (or a rollover). But oddly enough, if you manually refresh the page it begins to work correctly for the rest of the time you view the page. Once you have left the page and return the same error occurs again and you have to go through the same process. Here's one of the pages to look at: link text Here's the CSS: #ThumbsGutter { background: url(../Images/1x1.gif); background: url(/Images/1x1.gif); height: 105px; left: 0px; position: absolute; top: 0px; width: 754px; z-index: 2; } #ThumbsHolder { display: none; } #ThumbsTable { left: 1px; } #Thumbs { background-color: #000; width: 703px; } #Thumbs ul { list-style: none; margin: 0; padding: 0; } #Thumbs ul li { display: inline; } .Thumbs ul li a { border-right: 1px solid #fff; border-top: 1px solid #fff; float: left; left: 1px; } .Thumbs ul li a img { filter: alpha(opacity=50); height: 104px; opacity: .5; width: 140px; } .Thumbs ul li a img.Hot { filter: alpha(opacity=100); opacity: 1; } Here is the javascript: //Variables var globalPath = ""; var imgMain; var gutter; var holder; var thumbs; var loadingImage; var holderState; var imgCount; var imgLoaded; var captionHolder; var captionState = 0; var captionHideTimer; var captionHideTime = 500; var thumbsHideTimer; var thumbsHideTime = 500; $(document).ready(function() { //Load Variables imgMain = $("#MainImage"); captionHolder = $("#CaptionHolder"); gutter = $("#ThumbsGutter"); holder = $("#ThumbsHolder"); thumbs = $("#Thumbs"); loadingImage = $("#LoadingImageHolder"); //Position Loading Image loadingImage.centerOnObject(imgMain); //Caption Tab Event Handlers $("#CaptionTab").mouseover(function() { clearCaptionHideTimer(); showCaption(); }).mouseout(function() { setCaptionHideTimer(); }); //Caption Holder Event Handlers captionHolder.mouseenter(function() { clearCaptionHideTimer(); }).mouseleave(function() { setCaptionHideTimer(); }); //Position Gutter if (jQuery.browser.safari) { gutter.css("left", imgMain.position().left + "px").css("top", ((imgMain.offset().top + imgMain.height()) - 89) + "px"); } else { gutter.css("left", imgMain.position().left + "px").css("top", ((imgMain.offset().top + imgMain.height()) - 105) + "px"); } //gutter.css("left", imgMain.position().left + "px").css("top", ((imgMain.offset().top + imgMain.height()) - 105) + "px"); //gutter.css("left", imgMain.offset().left + "px").css("top", ((imgMain.offset().top + imgMain.height()) - gutter.height()) + "px"); //Thumb Tab Event Handlers $("#ThumbTab").mouseover(function() { clearThumbsHideTimer(); showThumbs(); }).mouseout(function() { setThumbsHideTimer(); }); //Gutter Event Handlers gutter.mouseenter(function() { //showThumbs(); clearThumbsHideTimer(); }).mouseleave(function() { //hideThumbs(); setThumbsHideTimer(); }); //Next/Prev Button Event Handlers $("#btnPrev").mouseover(function() { $(this).attr("src", globalPath + "/Images/GalleryLeftButtonHot.jpg"); }).mouseout(function() { $(this).attr("src", globalPath + "/Images/GalleryLeftButton.jpg"); }); $("#btnNext").mouseover(function() { $(this).attr("src", globalPath + "/Images/GalleryRightButtonHot.jpg"); }).mouseout(function() { $(this).attr("src", globalPath + "/Images/GalleryRightButton.jpg"); }); //Load Gallery //loadGallery(1); }); function loadGallery(galleryID) { //Hide Holder holderState = 0; holder.css("display", "none"); //Hide Empty Gallery Text $("#EmptyGalleryText").css("display", "none"); //Show Loading Message $("#LoadingGalleryOverlay").css("display", "inline").centerOnObject(imgMain); $("#LoadingGalleryText").css("display", "inline").centerOnObject(imgMain); //Load Thumbs thumbs.load(globalPath + "/GetGallery.aspx", { GID: galleryID }, function() { $("#TitleHolder").html($("#TitleContainer").html()); $("#DescriptionHolder").html($("#DescriptionContainer").html()); imgCount = $("#Thumbs img").length; imgLoaded = 0; if (imgCount == 0) { $("#LoadingGalleryText").css("display", "none"); $("#EmptyGalleryText").css("display", "inline").centerOnObject(imgMain); } else { $("#Thumbs img").load(function() { imgLoaded++; if (imgLoaded == imgCount) { holder.css("display", "inline"); //Carousel Thumbs thumbs.jCarouselLite({ btnNext: "#btnNext", btnPrev: "#btnPrev", mouseWheel: true, scroll: 1, visible: 5 }); //Small Image Event Handlers $("#Thumbs img").each(function(i) { $(this).mouseover(function() { $(this).addClass("Hot"); }).mouseout(function() { $(this).removeClass("Hot"); }).click(function() { //Load Big Image setImage($(this)); }); }); holder.css("display", "none"); //Load First Image var img = new Image(); img.onload = function() { imgMain.attr("src", img.src); setCaption($("#Image1").attr("alt")); //Hide Loading Message $("#LoadingGalleryText").css("display", "none"); $("#LoadingGalleryOverlay").css("display", "none"); } img.src = $("#Image1").attr("bigimg"); } }); } }); } function showCaption() { if (captionState == 0) { $("#CaptionTab").attr("src", globalPath + "/Images/CaptionTabHot.jpg"); captionHolder.css("display", "inline").css("left", imgMain.position().left + "px").css("top", imgMain.position().top + "px").css("width", imgMain.width() + "px").effect("slide", { "direction": "up" }, 500, function() { captionState = 1; }); } } function hideCaption() { if (captionState == 1) { captionHolder.toggle("slide", { "direction": "up" }, 500, function() { $("#CaptionTab").attr("src", globalPath + "/Images/CaptionTab.jpg"); captionState = 0; }); } } function setCaptionHideTimer() { captionHideTimer = window.setTimeout(hideCaption,captionHideTime); } function clearCaptionHideTimer() { if(captionHideTimer) { window.clearTimeout(captionHideTimer); captionHideTimer = null; } } function showThumbs() { if (holderState == 0) { $("#ThumbTab").attr("src", globalPath + "/Images/ThumbTabHot.jpg"); holder.effect("slide", { "direction": "down" }, 500, function() { holderState = 1; }); } } function hideThumbs() { if (holderState == 1) { if (jQuery.browser.safari) { holder.css("display", "none"); $("#ThumbTab").attr("src", globalPath + "/Images/ThumbTab.jpg"); holderState = 0; } else { holder.toggle("slide", { "direction": "down" }, 500, function() { $("#ThumbTab").attr("src", globalPath + "/Images/ThumbTab.jpg"); holderState = 0; }); } } } function setThumbsHideTimer() { thumbsHideTimer = window.setTimeout(hideThumbs,thumbsHideTime); } function clearThumbsHideTimer() { if(thumbsHideTimer) { window.clearTimeout(thumbsHideTimer); thumbsHideTimer = null; } } function setImage(image) { //Show Loading Image loadingImage.css("display", "inline"); var img = new Image(); img.onload = function() { //imgMain.css("background","url(" + img.src + ")").css("display","none").fadeIn(250); imgMain.attr("src", img.src).css("display", "none").fadeIn(250); setCaption(image.attr("alt")); //Hide Loading Image loadingImage.css("display", "none"); }; img.src = image.attr("bigimg"); } function setCaption(caption) { $("#CaptionText").html(caption); //alert($("#CaptionText").html()); /* if (caption.length 0) { $("#CaptionText") .css("display", "inline") .css("left", imgMain.position().left + "px") .css("top", imgMain.position().top + "px") .css("width", imgMain.width() + "px") .html(caption); $("#CaptionOverlay").css("display", "inline") .css("height", $("#CaptionText").height() + 36 + "px") .css("left", imgMain.position().left + "px") .css("top", imgMain.position().top + "px") .css("width", imgMain.width() + "px"); } else { $("#CaptionText").css("display", "none"); $("#CaptionOverlay").css("display", "none"); } */ } Please if anyone could help, it would be greatly appreciated! Thanks in advance. Justin

    Read the article

  • Switching CSS to use asset pipeline in Rails?

    - by John
    I have a lot of legacy CSS files from what was a Rails 2.x app that got upgraded to Rails 3.2.8, and I want to switch over to using the Rails asset pipeline for stylesheets. The issue is, the CSS stuff is messy in terms of huge lines of code, duplicate file names, and unorganized folder structure. After looking through individual pages, and trying to add individual stylesheets and folders into the asset pipeline and spending some cycles debugging, I realized there's probably a better approach. Is there a way to test to make sure the old CSS matches up with the asset pipeline CSS? What are some good tools for testing and debugging CSS?

    Read the article

  • CSS just for most basic HTML

    - by Gerenuk
    I've read that my note system Wikidpad, which exports to very simple HTML, can use CSS (http://wikidpad.sourceforge.net/help/HtmlCss.html) The elements in the output are not more than basic headings, bullet points and tables. I'd like to try some kind of improved style, but I as I have no knowledge about CSS, so the best I can do is to save some Myfile.css to a directory :) However if I google "CSS template" I get all sorts of complicating results that I cannot make sense of :( Am I using wrong terminology? Can you suggest what I should search for or maybe you even know a ressource where a get a simple CSS file with some decent standard HTML elements. I do not wish to make custom adjustments.

    Read the article

  • CSS Div Width Problem - Lining divs... widths seem to be off in IE7

    - by jlrolin
    So far, I'm doing this programmatically using VB.net/ASP.net: 'Create Container Div Dim ContainerDiv As New HtmlGenericControl("div") ContainerDiv.Style("width") = "100%" ContainerDiv.Style("clear") = "both" ContainerDiv.Style("text-align") = "left" ContainerDiv.Style("margin") = "0" 'Create Expand/Collapse Image Dim img As New Image img.ImageUrl = Page.ResolveUrl("~/images/minus99.jpg") img.Attributes.Add("onclick", "change(this.parent);") 'Create Company Display Dim lbl As New Label lbl.Text = Parsetext(pc.NAME) lbl.Font.Bold = True lbl.Style("font-size") = "16px" Dim NameDiv As New HtmlGenericControl("div") 'NameDiv.Style("background-color") = "#F0D3D3" NameDiv.Style("width") = "375px" NameDiv.Style("float") = "left" NameDiv.Style("margin") = "0" NameDiv.Style("display") = "block" NameDiv.Controls.Add(img) NameDiv.Controls.Add(lbl) ContainerDiv.Controls.Add(NameDiv) Dim SetupDiv As New HtmlGenericControl("div") SetupDiv.Style("background-color") = "#F0D3D3" SetupDiv.Style("width") = "210px" SetupDiv.Style("float") = "left" SetupDiv.Style("margin") = "0" SetupDiv.Style("display") = "block" 'SetupDiv.Style("position") = "fixed" ContainerDiv.Controls.Add(SetupDiv) Dim UsedDiv As New HtmlGenericControl("div") UsedDiv.Style("background-color") = "#CFF5CE" UsedDiv.Style("width") = "140px" UsedDiv.Style("float") = "left" UsedDiv.Style("margin") = "0" UsedDiv.Style("display") = "block" 'UsedDiv.Style("position") = "fixed" ContainerDiv.Controls.Add(UsedDiv) Dim RemDiv As New HtmlGenericControl("div") RemDiv.Style("background-color") = "#BEE0F7" 'RemDiv.Style("position") = "absolute" RemDiv.Style("width") = "210px" RemDiv.Style("float") = "right" RemDiv.Style("padding") = "0" RemDiv.Style("margin") = "0" RemDiv.Style("display") = "block" 'RemDiv.Style("position") = "fixed" ContainerDiv.Controls.Add(RemDiv) This should give me four DIVS inside a container DIV. Here's what it's coming out as: The correct blocks above the non-inline blocks are from a table with the same exact widths as the ones I'm using on the Divs. There isn't any CSS adding pixels to them, I don't think. I need to line these up, and I can't figure out where my problem is here. Any help would be appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Is it really necessary to have a competely validated Mark Up and css for SEO purposes

    - by Hitesh Manchanda
    Hi , While validating my CSS on http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/ I am getting following errors: 1.Property zoom doesn't exist : 1 1. 2.Property -webkit-transition doesn't exist : all 200ms ease-in all 200ms ease-in 3.Property opacity doesn't exist in CSS level 2.1 4.Property -moz-border-radius doesn't exist 5.Property -webkit-border-radius doesn't exist Is it really required to validate the MarkUp and CSS completely for SEO or these errors which mostly are browser specific can be ignored for now. If these errors have to removed can someone please suggest the way to do so also.

    Read the article

  • Tools to make CSS sprites?

    - by Simon_Weaver
    Are there any good tools to make css sprites? IDEALLY I'd want to give it a directory of images and an existing .css file that refers to those images and have it create a big image optimized with all the little images AND change my .css file to refer to those images. At the least I'd want it to take a directory of images and generate a big sprite and the .css necessary to use each as a background. Are there any good photoshop plugins or fully blown apps to do this?

    Read the article

  • CSS selectors : should I make my CSS easier to read or optimise the speed

    - by Laurent Bourgault-Roy
    As I was working on a small website, I decided to use the PageSpeed extension to check if their was some improvement I could do to make the site load faster. However I was quite surprise when it told me that my use of CSS selector was "inefficient". I was always told that you should keep the usage of the class attribute in the HTML to a minimum, but if I understand correctly what PageSpeed tell me, it's much more efficient for the browser to match directly against a class name. It make sense to me, but it also mean that I need to put more CSS classes in my HTML. It make my .css file harder to read. I usually tend to mark my CSS like this : #mainContent p.productDescription em.priceTag { ... } Which make it easy to read : I know this will affect the main content and that it affect something in a paragraph tag (so I wont start to put all sort of layout code in it) that describe a product and its something that need emphasis. However it seem I should rewrite it as .priceTag { ... } Which remove all context information about the style. And if I want to use differently formatted price tag (for example, one in a list on the sidebar and one in a paragraph), I need to use something like that .paragraphPriceTag { ... } .listPriceTag { ... } Which really annoy me since I seem to duplicate the semantic of the HTML in my classes. And that mean I can't put common style in an unqualified .priceTag { ... } and thus I need to replicate the style in both CSS rule, making it harder to make change. (Altough for that I could use multiple class selector, but IE6 dont support them) I believe making code harder to read for the sake of speed has never been really considered a very good practice . Except where it is critical, of course. This is why people use PHP/Ruby/C# etc. instead of C/assembly to code their site. It's easier to write and debug. So I was wondering if I should stick with few CSS classes and complex selector or if I should go the optimisation route and remove my fancy CSS selectors for the sake of speed? Does PageSpeed make over the top recommandation? On most modern computer, will it even make a difference?

    Read the article

  • Best practice: How to use (repeat) CSS style attributes correctly?

    - by ellie
    Hi guys! As a CSS newbie I'm wondering if it's recommended by professionals to repeat specific style attributes and their not inherited but default properties for every relevant selector? For example, should I rather use body {background:transparent none no-repeat; border:0 none transparent; margin:0; padding:0;} img {background:transparent none no-repeat; border:0 none transparent; margin:0; outline:transparent none 0; padding:0;} div#someID {background:transparent none no-repeat; border:0 none; margin:0 auto; padding:0; text-align:left; width:720px; ...} or body {background:transparent; border:0; margin:0; padding:0;} img {background:transparent; border:0; margin:0; outline:0; padding:0;} div#someID {background:transparent; border:0; margin:0 auto; padding:0; text-align:left; width:720px; ...} or just what (I think) I really need body {background:transparent; margin:0; padding:0;} img {border:0; outline:0;} div#someID {margin:0 auto; width:720px; ...} If it's best practice to go with the first or second one what do you think about defining a class like .foo {background:transparent; border:0; margin:0; padding:0;} and then applying it to every relevant selector: <div id="someID" class="foo">...</div> Yep, now I'm totally confused... so please advise! Thanks!

    Read the article

  • GWT layout panels vs. CSS layout

    - by David
    I read an article entitled "Tags First GWT", in which the writer suggests using GWT for event-handling, and CSS for layout. I just don't know whether the benefit of GWT's cross-browser compatibility goodness outweighs the flexibility offered by pure CSS layout. GWT GWT 2.0 has some snazzy layout panels, but to get them to resize properly you really need to build the entire panel containment tree from the root panel down. It's an all-or-nothing thing, it seems. CSS You can use CSS to layout an application too, and I'm inclined to do just that, if only to justify my purchase of several books touting the 'semantic markup' gospel. The downside might be cross-browser incompatibilities, the prevalence of which I have yet to determine. Which way to go? What is your opinion? Are cross-browser problems bad enough, and prevalent enough, to warrant ditching my CSS books, and building with GWT layout panels?

    Read the article

  • Css editor with certain features

    - by user255408
    I need a light css editor with certain functions. Already downloaded and tried a few apps but still no luck, none of them fit my requirements. Actually, there is one, CssEdit (or TextMate), but unfortunately i'm a windows user... Already tried: built-in NetBeans IDE css editor (btw nice editor, the one i'm using now for css) IntelJ IDE (very good html and css editor, but using the entire ide just for this - that's crazy) ArduoCss (very buggy in win7 environment) Notepad Notepad++ (it rules, but as i said, i need something more functional for css editing) Style Master ( if i don't find anything else, probably i'll choose this one) Stylizer ( also might be my choice, but it's black interface kills me, also extremy noob-oriented, i even couldn't find a way to see the source code) Some of the features i am looking for: grouping by comments like here snippets autocomplete, if i type for instance f-s, it should recognize and expand it to "font-size" property color picker The editor must have at least the first feature that i listed above. Sorry for my poor english.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >