Search Results

Search found 504 results on 21 pages for 'doug mercer'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 4/21 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

  • Probleme with id increment

    - by Mercer
    hello, when i do this request i have an error INSERT INTO FR_METIERPUBLI( D_NIDMTR, D_NIDPUBLI ) VALUES ( 'SELECT MAX( D_NIDMTR ) FROM FR_METIERPUBLI + 1', 1000 i want to increment my id

    Read the article

  • Error of iterator in mys JSP

    - by Mercer
    Hello, in my jsp i do this <table> <tr> <th>TITLLE</th> </tr> <tr class="row0"> <logic:iterate id="listClient" name="Client"> <td> [...] </td> </logic:iterate> </tr> </table> <logic:iterate id="listClient" name="Client"> <table> <tr> <td> [...] </td> </tr> </table> </logic:iterate> But i have this error for my second iterate javax.servlet.jsp.JspException: Cannot create iterator for this collection

    Read the article

  • compare string to date on mysql

    - by Mercer
    hello, i have a table with a date, this date is a string i want to compare this string with a date in my request. SELECT FE_CLIENT.* FROM FE_CLIENT WHERE D_DATFINPUBLI < '2010/06/03' How can i cast my column date_deb to a date for compare ..?

    Read the article

  • Sort tables with two elements

    - by Mercer
    Hello i want to make a sort in java. In my object i have many element so i want to make this sort with power and model public class Product implements Comparable<Product>,Serializable { private int idProduct ; private int power; private String model; private String color; [...] @Override public int compareTo(Product o) { return String.valueOf(this.power).compareTo(String.valueOf(o.power)); } so how to make sort with power and model

    Read the article

  • Java map with values limited by key's type parameter

    - by Ashley Mercer
    Is there a way in Java to have a map where the type parameter of a value is tied to the type parameter of a key? What I want to write is something like the following: public class Foo { // This declaration won't compile - what should it be? private static Map<Class<T>, T> defaultValues; // These two methods are just fine public static <T> void setDefaultValue(Class<T> clazz, T value) { defaultValues.put(clazz, value); } public static <T> T getDefaultValue(Class<T> clazz) { return defaultValues.get(clazz); } } That is, I can store any default value against a Class object, provided the value's type matches that of the Class object. I don't see why this shouldn't be allowed since I can ensure when setting/getting values that the types are correct. EDIT: Thanks to cletus for his answer. I don't actually need the type parameters on the map itself since I can ensure consistency in the methods which get/set values, even if it means using some slightly ugly casts.

    Read the article

  • How to instantiate a FormFile Object ?

    - by Mercer
    Hello, i have a String with a path of my file and i want to instancie a new FormFile with this String. It's possible ..? My code: public ArrayList<FormFile> getFilesFromFolder(String path) { File file = new File(path); ArrayList<FormFile> vFiles = new ArrayList<FormFile>(); if (file.exists()) { File[] files = file.listFiles(); int i; for (i = 0; i < files.length; i++) { if (files[i].isFile()) { vFiles.add((FormFile) files[i]); } } } else { vFiles = null; } return vFiles; } but i have an error in this line vFiles.add((FormFile) files[i]);

    Read the article

  • Reverse List<Object>

    - by Mercer
    Hello, i have a List List<DataClient> listDataClient; My class DataCLient: Client client; List<String> phoneNumber; i have a second list List<DataPhoneNumber> listPhoneNumber; My class DataPhoneNumber: String phoneNumber; List<Client> client; In my code i put data in my first list but now i want to reverse my list in the second. In the first list i have a Client wiht x NumberPhone now i want to have NumberPhone for x Client

    Read the article

  • C++0x rvalue references - lvalues-rvalue binding

    - by Doug
    This is a follow-on question to http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2748866/c0x-rvalue-references-and-temporaries In the previous question, I asked how this code should work: void f(const std::string &); //less efficient void f(std::string &&); //more efficient void g(const char * arg) { f(arg); } It seems that the move overload should probably be called because of the implicit temporary, and this happens in GCC but not MSVC (or the EDG front-end used in MSVC's Intellisense). What about this code? void f(std::string &&); //NB: No const string & overload supplied void g1(const char * arg) { f(arg); } void g2(const std::string & arg) { f(arg); } It seems that, based on the answers to my previous question that function g1 is legal (and is accepted by GCC 4.3-4.5, but not by MSVC). However, GCC and MSVC both reject g2 because of clause 13.3.3.1.4/3, which prohibits lvalues from binding to rvalue ref arguments. I understand the rationale behind this - it is explained in N2831 "Fixing a safety problem with rvalue references". I also think that GCC is probably implementing this clause as intended by the authors of that paper, because the original patch to GCC was written by one of the authors (Doug Gregor). However, I don't this is quite intuitive. To me, (a) a const string & is conceptually closer to a string && than a const char *, and (b) the compiler could create a temporary string in g2, as if it were written like this: void g2(const std::string & arg) { f(std::string(arg)); } Indeed, sometimes the copy constructor is considered to be an implicit conversion operator. Syntactically, this is suggested by the form of a copy constructor, and the standard even mentions this specifically in clause 13.3.3.1.2/4, where the copy constructor for derived-base conversions is given a higher conversion rank than other implicit conversions: A conversion of an expression of class type to the same class type is given Exact Match rank, and a conversion of an expression of class type to a base class of that type is given Conversion rank, in spite of the fact that a copy/move constructor (i.e., a user-defined conversion function) is called for those cases. (I assume this is used when passing a derived class to a function like void h(Base), which takes a base class by value.) Motivation My motivation for asking this is something like the question asked in http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2696156/how-to-reduce-redundant-code-when-adding-new-c0x-rvalue-reference-operator-over ("How to reduce redundant code when adding new c++0x rvalue reference operator overloads"). If you have a function that accepts a number of potentially-moveable arguments, and would move them if it can (e.g. a factory function/constructor: Object create_object(string, vector<string>, string) or the like), and want to move or copy each argument as appropriate, you quickly start writing a lot of code. If the argument types are movable, then one could just write one version that accepts the arguments by value, as above. But if the arguments are (legacy) non-movable-but-swappable classes a la C++03, and you can't change them, then writing rvalue reference overloads is more efficient. So if lvalues did bind to rvalues via an implicit copy, then you could write just one overload like create_object(legacy_string &&, legacy_vector<legacy_string> &&, legacy_string &&) and it would more or less work like providing all the combinations of rvalue/lvalue reference overloads - actual arguments that were lvalues would get copied and then bound to the arguments, actual arguments that were rvalues would get directly bound. Questions My questions are then: Is this a valid interpretation of the standard? It seems that it's not the conventional or intended one, at any rate. Does it make intuitive sense? Is there a problem with this idea that I"m not seeing? It seems like you could get copies being quietly created when that's not exactly expected, but that's the status quo in places in C++03 anyway. Also, it would make some overloads viable when they're currently not, but I don't see it being a problem in practice. Is this a significant enough improvement that it would be worth making e.g. an experimental patch for GCC?

    Read the article

  • Remove duplicates from a list

    - by Mercer
    Hello i want to remove duplicates from a list i do this but not working List<Customer> listCustomer = new ArrayList<Customer>(); for (Customer customer: tmpListCustomer) { if (!listCustomer.contains(customer)) { listCustomer.add(customer); } }

    Read the article

  • Error in my web.xml

    - by Mercer
    Why i have an error in my web.xml when i want add servlet..? <servlet> <servlet-name>ClientServlet</servlet-name> <servlet-class>org.task.ClientServlet</servlet-class> <servlet-name>FactoryServlet</servlet-name> <servlet-class>org.task.FactoryServlet</servlet-class> <servlet-name>TraderServlet</servlet-name> <servlet-class>org.task.TraderServlet</servlet-class> </servlet> <servlet-mapping> <servlet-name>ClientServlet</servlet-name> <url-pattern>/ClientServlet</url-pattern> <servlet-name>FactoryServlet</servlet-name> <url-pattern>/FactoryServlet</url-pattern> <servlet-name>TraderServlet</servlet-name> <url-pattern>/TraderServlet</url-pattern> </servlet-mapping>

    Read the article

  • select multiple double side

    - by Mercer
    hello, i want to do a select multiple double side like this : http://www.senamion.com/blog/jmultiselect2side.html (Demo2) but i don't know how i can retrieve my data when i click submit button..?

    Read the article

  • Increment my id in my insert request

    - by Mercer
    hello, i have a table with some rows. idClient, name, adress,country,... i want to know how i can do an insert into this table with auto increment my idClient in my sql request..? Thx. edit: i want do a request like this insert into Client values((select max(idClient),...)

    Read the article

  • Generate Permutations of a List

    - by Eric Mercer
    I'm writing a function that takes a list and returns a list of permutations of the argument. I know how to do it by using a function that removes an element and then recursively use that function to generate all permutations. I now have a problem where I want to use the following function: (define (insert-everywhere item lst) (define (helper item L1 L2) (if (null? L2) (cons (append L1 (cons item '())) '()) (cons (append L1 (cons item L2)) (helper item (append L1 (cons (car L2) '())) (cdr L2))))) (helper item '() lst)) This function will insert the item into every possible location of the list, like the following: (insert-everywhere 1 '(a b)) will get: '((1 a b) (a 1 b) (a b 1)) How would I use this function to get all permutations of a list? I now have: (define (permutations lst) (if (null? lst) '() (insert-helper (car lst) (permutations (cdr lst))))) (define (insert-helper item lst) (cond ((null? lst) '()) (else (append (insert-everywhere item (car lst)) (insert-helper item (cdr lst)))))) but doing (permutations '(1 2 3)) just returns the empty list '().

    Read the article

  • Help using recursion in Java

    - by Mercer
    I have a class Group. In the class I have two fields, idGroup IdGroupGroup. Groups may be part of other groups. My class Group is defined in a HashMap<Integer,Integer>; the key is IdGroupGroup and value is idGroup. I want to search the map for a particular idGroup; can I use recursion to do this?

    Read the article

  • Sort a list whit element still in first position

    - by Mercer
    Hello, i have a String list List<String> listString = new ArrayList<String>(); listString.add("faq"); listString.add("general"); listString.add("contact"); I do some processing on the list and i want to sort this list but I want general is still in first position Thx ;)

    Read the article

  • Sort a list with element still in first position

    - by Mercer
    I have a String list: List<String> listString = new ArrayList<String>(); listString.add("faq"); listString.add("general"); listString.add("contact"); I do some processing on the list and I want to sort this list but I want "general" still to be in first position. Thx ;)

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >