Search Results

Search found 1101 results on 45 pages for 'handlers'.

Page 4/45 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

  • AS3 httpservice - pass arguments to event handlers by reference

    - by Shawn Simon
    I have this code: var service:HTTPService = new HTTPService(); if (search.Location && search.Location.length > 0 && chkLocalSearch.selected) { service.url = 'http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/services/search/local'; service.request.q = search.Keyword; service.request.near = search.Location; } else { service.url = 'http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/services/search/web'; service.request.q = search.Keyword + " " + search.Location; } service.request.v = '1.0'; service.resultFormat = 'text'; service.addEventListener(ResultEvent.RESULT, onServerResponse); service.send(); I want to pass the search object to the result method (onServerResponse) but if I do it in a closure it gets passed by value. Is there anyway to do it by reference without searching through my array of search objects for the value returned in the result? Sorry, this is simple but it's been a long day...

    Read the article

  • JQuery: Dynamically-generated form fields not submitted and event handlers appear to fire multiple t

    - by Bob
    Hi, I'm new to JQuery, so I apologise if there's something which should be obvious which I'm unaware of. I seem to be having a couple of issues some JQuery I'm trying to implement: Code: http://pastebin.ca/1843496 (the editor didn't seem to like HTML tags) post_test.php simply contains: [?php print_r($_POST); ?] in an attempt to find out what's actually being submitted. The first issue I'm having is that only the hidden form fields are actually being submitted. If I insert tags into the container DIV manually it works as expected, but when done as above the text field doesn't get posted. From what I've read, I gather it's to do with the fact that the DOM is being modified after it's loaded, but the thing that's puzzling me is why, in that case, there are no issues referencing the other added hidden fields or the tag. I've experimented with changing the event handler for a.save to '.live('click', function ...' and also using LiveQuery to no avail. The other issue is that when a.save is clicked, before the form is actually submitted, as far as I can tell the event handler is running again, replacing the value entered into the text field with the value of editable.text(), which is what ultimately gets submitted. I'm sorry if any of this is unclear. Regards,

    Read the article

  • Can' get couchdb external http handlers to work.

    - by fuzzy lollipop
    following the instructions here http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/ExternalProcesses this is what I get { * error: "{{badarg,[{erlang,port_command, [#Port<0.2056>, [123, [34,<<"info">>,34], 58, [123, [34,"db_name",34], 58, [34,<<"transfer_central">>,34], 44, [34,"doc_count",34], 58,"39441",44, [34,"doc_del_count",34], 58,"0",44, [34,"update_seq",34], 58,"56508",44, [34,"purge_seq",34], 58,"0",44, [34,"compact_running",34], 58,<<"false">>,44, [34,"disk_size",34], 58,"43593828",44, [34,"instance_start_time",34], 58, [34,<<"1272560477320483">>,34], 44, [34,"disk_format_version",34], 58,"5",125], 44, [34,<<"id">>,34], 58,<<"null">>,44, [34,<<"method">>,34], 58, [34,"GET",34], 44, [34,<<"path">>,34], 58, [91, [34,<<"transfer_central">>,34], 44, [34,<<"_test">>,34], 93], 44, [34,<<"query">>,34], 58,<<"{}">>,44, [34,<<"headers">>,34], 58, [123, [34,<<"Accept">>,34], 58, [34, <<"text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8,application/json">>, 34], 44, [34,<<"Accept-Charset">>,34], 58, [34,<<"ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7">>,34], 44, [34,<<"Accept-Encoding">>,34], 58, [34,<<"gzip,deflate">>,34], 44, [34,<<"Accept-Language">>,34], 58, [34,<<"en-us,en;q=0.5">>,34], 44, [34,<<"Connection">>,34], 58, [34,<<"keep-alive">>,34], 44, [34,<<"Host">>,34], 58, [34,<<"127.0.0.1:5984">>,34], 44, [34,<<"Keep-Alive">>,34], 58, [34,<<"115">>,34], 44, [34,<<"User-Agent">>,34], 58, [34, <<"Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.3) Gecko/20100401 Firefox/3.6.3">>, 34], 125], 44, [34,<<"body">>,34], 58, [34,"undefined",34], 44, [34,<<"peer">>,34], 58, [34,<<"127.0.0.1">>,34], 44, [34,<<"form">>,34], 58,<<"{}">>,44, [34,<<"cookie">>,34], 58,<<"{}">>,44, [34,<<"userCtx">>,34], 58, [123, [34,<<"db">>,34], 58, [34,<<"transfer_central">>,34], 44, [34,<<"name">>,34], 58,<<"null">>,44, [34,<<"roles">>,34], 58,<<"[]">>,125], 125,10]]}, {couch_os_process,writeline,2}, {couch_os_process,writejson,2}, {couch_os_process,handle_call,3}, {gen_server,handle_msg,5}, {proc_lib,init_p_do_apply,3}]}, {gen_server,call, [<0.110.0>, {prompt,{[{<<"info">>, {[{db_name,<<"transfer_central">>}, {doc_count,39441}, {doc_del_count,0}, {update_seq,56508}, {purge_seq,0}, {compact_running,false}, {disk_size,43593828}, {instance_start_time,<<"1272560477320483">>}, {disk_format_version,5}]}}, {<<"id">>,null}, {<<"method">>,'GET'}, {<<"path">>,[<<"transfer_central">>,<<"_test">>]}, {<<"query">>,{[]}}, {<<"headers">>, {[{<<"Accept">>, <<"text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8,application/json">>}, {<<"Accept-Charset">>, <<"ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7">>}, {<<"Accept-Encoding">>,<<"gzip,deflate">>}, {<<"Accept-Language">>,<<"en-us,en;q=0.5">>}, {<<"Connection">>,<<"keep-alive">>}, {<<"Host">>,<<"127.0.0.1:5984">>}, {<<"Keep-Alive">>,<<"115">>}, {<<"User-Agent">>, <<"Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.3) Gecko/20100401 Firefox/3.6.3">>}]}}, {<<"body">>,undefined}, {<<"peer">>,<<"127.0.0.1">>}, {<<"form">>,{[]}}, {<<"cookie">>,{[]}}, {<<"userCtx">>, {[{<<"db">>,<<"transfer_central">>}, {<<"name">>,null}, {<<"roles">>,[]}]}}]}}, infinity]}}" * reason: "{gen_server,call, [<0.109.0>, {execute,{[{<<"info">>, {[{db_name,<<"transfer_central">>}, {doc_count,39441}, {doc_del_count,0}, {update_seq,56508}, {purge_seq,0}, {compact_running,false}, {disk_size,43593828}, {instance_start_time,<<"1272560477320483">>}, {disk_format_version,5}]}}, {<<"id">>,null}, {<<"method">>,'GET'}, {<<"path">>,[<<"transfer_central">>,<<"_test">>]}, {<<"query">>,{[]}}, {<<"headers">>, {[{<<"Accept">>, <<"text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8,application/json">>}, {<<"Accept-Charset">>, <<"ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7">>}, {<<"Accept-Encoding">>,<<"gzip,deflate">>}, {<<"Accept-Language">>,<<"en-us,en;q=0.5">>}, {<<"Connection">>,<<"keep-alive">>}, {<<"Host">>,<<"127.0.0.1:5984">>}, {<<"Keep-Alive">>,<<"115">>}, {<<"User-Agent">>, <<"Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.3) Gecko/20100401 Firefox/3.6.3">>}]}}, {<<"body">>,undefined}, {<<"peer">>,<<"127.0.0.1">>}, {<<"form">>,{[]}}, {<<"cookie">>,{[]}}, {<<"userCtx">>, {[{<<"db">>,<<"transfer_central">>}, {<<"name">>,null}, {<<"roles">>,[]}]}}]}}, infinity]}" }

    Read the article

  • Wiring up JavaScript handlers after a Partial Postback in ASP.NET

    - by Richard
    I am trying to use LinkButtons with the DefaultButton property of the ASP.NET Panel in an UpdatePanel. I have read and used the various other answers that are around describing the wiring up of the click event so that a full postback is not done instead of a partial postback. When the page loads, I wire up the .click function of the LinkButton so that the DefaultButton property of the ASP.NET panel will work. This all works fine, until you bring an UpdatePanel into the mix. With an UpdatePanel, if there is a partial postback, the script to wire up the .click function is not called in the partial postback, and hitting enter reverts to causing a full submit of the form rather than triggering the LinkButton. How can I cause javascript to be executed after a partial postback to re-wire up the .click function of the LinkButton? I have produced a sample page which shows the problem. There are two alerts showing 1) When the code to hook up the .click function is being called, and 2) When the .click function has been called (this only happens when you hit enter in the textbox after the event has been wired up). To test this code, type something in the textbox and hit Enter. The text will be copied to the label control, but "Wiring up Event Click" alert will not be shown. Add another letter, hit enter again, and you'll get a full postback without the text being copied to the label control (as the LinkButton wasn't called). Because that was a full postback, the Wiring Up Event Click event will be called again, and the form will work properly the next time again. This is being done with ASP.NET 3.5. Test Case Code: <%@ Page Language="C#" Inherits="System.Web.UI.Page" Theme="" EnableTheming="false" AutoEventWireup="true" %> <script runat="server"> void cmdComplete_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { lblOutput.Text = "Complete Pressed: " + txtInput.Text; } void cmdFirstButton_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { lblOutput.Text = "First Button Pressed"; } protected override void OnLoad(EventArgs e) { HookupButton(cmdComplete); } void HookupButton(LinkButton button) { // Use the click event of the LinkButton to trigger the postback (this is used by the .click code below) button.OnClientClick = Page.ClientScript.GetPostBackEventReference(button, String.Empty); // Wire up the .click event of the button to call the onclick function, and prevent a form submit string clickString = string.Format(@" alert('Wiring up click event'); document.getElementById('{0}').click = function() {{ alert('Default button pressed'); document.getElementById('{0}').onclick(); }};", button.ClientID, Page.ClientScript.GetPostBackEventReference(button, "")); Page.ClientScript.RegisterStartupScript(button.GetType(), "click_hookup_" + button.ClientID, clickString, true); } </script> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html> <head> <title>DefaultButton/LinkButton Testing</title> <style type="text/css"> a.Button { line-height: 2em; padding: 5px; border: solid 1px #CCC; background-color: #EEE; } </style> </head> <body> <h1> DefaultButton/LinkButton Testing</h1> <form runat="server"> <asp:ScriptManager runat="server" /> <asp:UpdatePanel ID="UpdatePanel1" runat="server"> <ContentTemplate> <div style="position: relative"> <fieldset> <legend>Output</legend> <asp:Label runat="server" ID="lblOutput" /> </fieldset> <asp:Button runat="server" Text="First Button" ID="cmdFirstButton" OnClick="cmdFirstButton_Click" UseSubmitBehavior="false" /> <asp:Panel ID="Panel1" runat="server" DefaultButton="cmdComplete"> <label> Enter Text:</label> <asp:TextBox runat="server" ID="txtInput" /> <asp:LinkButton runat="server" CssClass="Button" ID="cmdComplete" OnClick="cmdComplete_Click" Text="Complete" /> </asp:Panel> </div> </ContentTemplate> </asp:UpdatePanel> <asp:Button runat="server" ID="cmdFullPostback" Text="Full Postback" /> </form> </body> </html>

    Read the article

  • Drupal Views api, add simple argument handler

    - by LanguaFlash
    Background: I have a complex search form that stores the query and it's hash in a cache. Once the cache is set, I redirect to something like /searchresults/e6c86fadc7e4b7a2d068932efc9cc358 where that big long string on the end is the md5 hash of my query. I need to make a new argument for views to know what the hash is good for. The reason for all this hastle is because my original search form is way to complex and has way to many arguments to consider putting them all into the path and expecting to do the filtering with the normal views arguments. Now for my question. I have been reading views 2 documentation but not figuring out how to accomplish this custom argument. It doesn't seem to me like this should be as hard as it seems to me like it must be. Leaving aside any knowledge of the veiws api, it would seem that all I need is a callback function that will take the argument from the path as it's only argument and return a list of node id's to filter to. Can anyone point me to a solution or give me some example code? Thanks for your help! You guys are great. PS. I am pretty sure that my design is the best I can come up with, lets don't get off my question and into cross checking my design logic if we can help it.

    Read the article

  • ASP.Net Problem with Event Handlers and Control Creation Timing

    - by Oliver Weichhold
    What I am trying to achieve here is to display a number of LinkButtons in a RadGrid Column. The buttons are generated from a collection property member of the bound grid row item. The CollectionLinkButton control is nothing more than a asp:Panel derived control that populates its Child Controls from "DataItem.SomeCollection" and this is working fine. The problem I am facing is with this part: Collection='<%# DataBinder.Eval(Container, "DataItem.SomeCollection") %' This is because databound Collection Property is populated so late in the lifecycle of the page that the LinkButton Controls that the CollectionLinkButton class creates from the collection are not available yet during Postback when the Click event Handler is supposed to fire and I have currently no idea how to solve this problem. <radG:RadGrid ID="grid" runat="server" DataSourceID="ds_AB"> <MasterTableView> <Columns> <radG:GridTemplateColumn> <ItemTemplate> <local:CollectionLinkButton ID="LinkButton1" runat="server" CssClass="EntityLinkButton" Collection='<%# DataBinder.Eval(Container, "DataItem.SomeCollection") %>' CollectionProperty="Id" CollectionDisplayProperty="Name" Text='<%# DataBinder.Eval(Container, "DataItem.Name") %>'</local:CollectionLinkButton> </ItemTemplate> </radG:GridTemplateColumn>

    Read the article

  • Protocol specific channel handlers

    - by Mickael Marrache
    I'm writing an application server that will receive SIP and DNS messages from the network. When I receive a message from the network, I understand from the documentation that at first, I get a ChannelBuffer. I would like to determine which kind of message has been received (SIP or DNS) and to decode it. To determine the message type, I can dedicate port to each type of message, but I would be interested to know if there exist another solution for that. My question is more about how to decode the ChannelBuffer. Is there a ChannelHandler provided by Netty to decode SIP or DNS messages? If not, what would be the right place in the type hierarchy to write my custom ChannelHandler? To illustrate my question, let's take as example the HttpRequestDecoder, the hierarchy is: java.lang.Object org.jboss.netty.channel.SimpleChannelUpstreamHandler org.jboss.netty.handler.codec.frame.FrameDecoder org.jboss.netty.handler.codec.replay.ReplayingDecoder<HttpMessageDecoder.State> org.jboss.netty.handler.codec.http.HttpMessageDecoder org.jboss.netty.handler.codec.http.HttpRequestDecoder Also, do I need to use two different ChannelHandler for decoding and encoding, or is there a possibility to use a single ChannelHandler for both? Thanks

    Read the article

  • PHP click event handlers.

    - by Guru
    Hello, I'm new to PHP programming and I wanted to know that is it possible to handle PHP events as we do in ASP.NET I mean I've got a img and I want to perform some task on click event of this img. I know how to do it in ASP.NET but please help me in context of PHP Thanks, GURU

    Read the article

  • C# event handlers not thread safe?

    - by Daniel
    So i've read around that instead of calling a event directly with if (SomeEvent != null) SomeEvent(this, null); i should be doing SomeEventHandler temp = SomeEvent; if (temp != null) temp(this, null); Why is this so? How does the second version become thread safe? What is the best practice?

    Read the article

  • Setting Class-Level Variable to Use Between Event Handlers

    - by lush
    I'm having a hard time understanding why the following code doesn't work. I'm sure it's something remedial that I'm missing or not understanding. I currently have a page that asks for user input. If, based on the input and logged in user, I find data from this page already in the database, I need to update the existing records rather than creating new ones, so I set a class-level bool to true. The problem is, when MyNextButton is clicked, PreviouslySubmitted is still false. So, I'm not sure how to make the value of this variable persist. Any advice is appreciated, thanks. public partial class MyForm : System.Web.UI.Page { private bool previouslySubmitted; protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e) { MyButton.Click += (o, i) => { q = from a in db.TableA where (a.SomeField == SomeValue) select a; if(q.Any()) { PreviouslySubmitted = true; //populate the form's fields with values from database for user to revise } } MyNextButton.Click += (o, i) => { if(PreviouslySubmitted) { //update database } else { //insert into database } }

    Read the article

  • Dynamic filling WrapPanel buttons from DB, setting the event handlers

    - by Anry
    I have a table: I'm using NHibernate. The class of entity: public class PurchasedItem { public virtual int Id { get; set; } public virtual Product Product { get; set; } public virtual int SortSale { get; set; } } I want to get all the records table PurchasedItems (my method returns an IList ). Records are sorted in descending order (column SortSale). How to fill WrapPanel buttons from the list IList ? For each button assign the event handler. By pressing the button display a message with the name of the product.

    Read the article

  • C# Event Handlers automatically created by WinForms Designer

    - by RHaguiuda
    Just moved from VB.NET to C#. In VB to connect and Event Handler to a Sub we use the Handles clause. From what it seems, this do not exist in C#. After creating a simple application with a button I realize that Window Forms Designer automatically created an EventHandler to my button1_Click function (after I double clicked it), in Form1.Designer.cs with this code: this.button1.Click += new System.EventHandler(this.button1_Click); But, in VB, the WinForms Designer create the Handles clause in my class, in the function header. So, C# create the default EventHandler in designer file, while VB creates in main class with control resides. Is this correct? Am I missing something here?

    Read the article

  • http handlers not working on web server but works on localhost

    - by ZX12R
    i have a couple of xml files in my asp.net web application that i don't want anyone to access other than my server side code. this is what i tried.. <add verb="*" path="*.xml" type="System.Web.HttpForbiddenHandler" /> i wrote this inside the <httpHandlers> it works well on the localhost but not in the server... the server without any hesitation displays the xml file... i have no idea how to proceed... thanks in advance..:)

    Read the article

  • C# Event Handlers Using an Enum

    - by Jimbo
    I have a StatusChanged event that is raised by my object when its status changes - however, the application needs to carry out additional actions based on what the new status is. e.g If the new status is Disconnected, then it must update the status bar text and send an email notification. So, I wanted to create an Enum with the possible statuses (Connected, Disconnected, ReceivingData, SendingData etc.) and have that sent with the EventArgs parameter of the event when it is raised (see below) Define the object: class ModemComm { public event CommanderEventHandler ModemCommEvent; public delegate void CommanderEventHandler(object source, ModemCommEventArgs e); public void Connect() { ModemCommEvent(this, new ModemCommEventArgs ModemCommEventArgs.eModemCommEvent.Connected)); } } Define the new EventArgs parameter: public class ModemCommEventArgs : EventArgs{ public enum eModemCommEvent { Idle, Connected, Disconnected, SendingData, ReceivingData } public eModemCommEvent eventType { get; set; } public string eventMessage { get; set; } public ModemCommEventArgs(eModemCommEvent eventType, string eventMessage) { this.eventMessage = eventMessage; this.eventType = eventType; } } I then create a handler for the event in the application: ModemComm comm = new ModemComm(); comm.ModemCommEvent += OnModemCommEvent; and private void OnModemCommEvent(object source, ModemCommEventArgs e) { } The problem is, I get a 'Object reference not set to an instance of an object' error when the object attempts to raise the event. Hoping someone can explain in n00b terms why and how to fix it :)

    Read the article

  • Javascript Prototype Best Practice Event Handlers

    - by nahum
    Hi this question is more a consulting of best practice, Sometimes when I'm building a complete ajax application I usually add elements dynamically for example. When you'r adding a list of items, I do something like: var template = new Template("<li id='list#{id}'>#{value}</li>"); var arrayTemplate = []; arrayOfItem.each(function(item, index){ arrayTemplate.push(template.evaluate( id : index, value : item)) }); after this two options add the list via "update" or "insert" ----- $("elementToUpdate").update("<ul>" + arrayTemplate.join("") + "</ul">); the question is how can I add the event handler without repeat the process of read the array, this is because if you try add a Event before the update or insert you will get an Error because the element isn't still on the DOM. so what I'm doing by now is after insert or update: arrayOfItem.each(function(item, index){ $("list" + index).observe("click", function(){ alert("I see the world"); }) }); so the question is exist a better way to doing this??????

    Read the article

  • ReSharper conventions for names of event handlers.

    - by Belousov Pavel
    Hello, When I add new event handler for any event, VS creates method like Button_Click. But ReSharper underlines this method as Warning, because all methods should not have any delimeters such as "_". How can I customize rules of ReSharper so that it doesn't underline such methods? Or may be I should rename such methods? Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • Removing DOM event handlers in long-running browser session

    - by Chris Beck
    I have a browser interface with a ul#contacts list on the left and div#contact property panel (email, phone) on the right. Click a contact in the list and my app makes an XHR request to get the contact property HTML fragment and update div#contact.innerHTML. Each contact fragment has an "Edit Contact" link. With JS, I progressively upgrade that link with an event listener that performs an XHR request to replace the static property panel with an in-place edit form. This can happen many times during a single browser session. How should I clean up my "Edit Contact" event listener? Do I need to remove it manually before the form overwrites the property panel? Or is the event listener cleaned up automatically when the contents of div#contact (and the node that I'm listening on) is overwritten? FWIW, I still consider IE6 to be part of my target market.

    Read the article

  • Message Handlers and the WeakReference issue

    - by user1058647
    The following message Handler works fine receiving messages from my service... private Handler handler = new Handler() { public void handleMessage(Message message) { Object path = message.obj; if (message.arg1 == 5 && path != null) //5 means its a single mapleg to plot on the map { String myString = (String) message.obj; Gson gson = new Gson(); MapPlot mapleg = gson.fromJson(myString, MapPlot.class); myMapView.getOverlays().add(new DirectionPathOverlay(mapleg.fromPoint, mapleg.toPoint)); mc.animateTo(mapleg.toPoint); } else { if (message.arg1 == RESULT_OK && path != null) { Toast.makeText(PSActivity.this, "Service Started" + path.toString(), Toast.LENGTH_LONG).show(); } else { Toast.makeText(PSActivity.this,"Service error" + String.valueOf(message.arg1), Toast.LENGTH_LONG).show(); } } }; }; However, even though it tests out alright in the AVD (I'm feeding it a large KML file via DDMS) the "object path = message.obj;" line has a WARNING saying "this Handler class should be static else leaks might occur". But if I say "static Handler handler = new Handler()" it won't compile complaining that I "cannot make a static reference to a non-static field myMapView. If I can't make such references, I can't do anything useful. This led me into several hours of googling around on this issue and learning more about weakReferences than I ever wanted to know. The often found reccomendation I find is that I should replace... private Handler handler = new Handler() with static class handler extends Handler { private final WeakReference<PSActivity> mTarget; handler(PSActivity target) { mTarget = new WeakReference<PSActivity>(target); } But this won't compile still complaining that I can't make a static reference to a non-dtatic field. So, my question a week or to ago was "how can I write a message handler for android so my service can send data to my activity. Even though I have working code, the question still stands with the suffix "without leaking memory". Thanks, Gary

    Read the article

  • Global Exception Handlers in Java

    - by Samuh
    I am thinking of setting up a global, default Exception handler for my (Android) Mobile application(which uses Java syntax) using Thread.setDefaultUncaughtExceptionHandler(...) call. I am thinking of just displaying an Alert Dialog with appropriate message to the user. Are there any gotchas, caveats and rules that one needs to follow when setting DefaultExceptionHandlers? Any best practices like making sure that the process is killed, full stack trace is written to logs etc. ? Links to documentation, tutorials etc. that can throw some light on this are welcome. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Passing around objects to network packet handlers ?

    - by xeross
    Hey, I've been writing a networking server for a while now in C++ and have come to the stage to start looking for a way to properly and easily handle all packets. I am so far that I can figure out what kind of packet it is, but now I need to figure out how to get the needed data to the handler functions. I had the following in mind: Have a map of function pointers with the opcode as key and the function pointer as value Have all these functions have 2 arguments, packet and ObjectAccessor ObjectAccessor class contains various functions to fetch various items such as users and alike Perhaps pass the user's guid too so we can fetch it from the objectaccessor I'd like to know the various implementations others have come up with, so please comment on this idea and reply with your own implementations. Thanks, Xeross

    Read the article

  • NServiceBus specify order of Handlers execution

    - by John Simons
    Just wondering if this is the way to specify the order to run a handler (AuthorizationHandler) before all others? public void SpecifyOrder(Order order) { order.Specify(First<AuthorizationHandler>.Then<IHandleMessages<IMessage>>()); } It just feels odd to add Then<IHandleMessages<IMessage>>(). Is there a nicer way of saying to the Bus execute x handler before all others?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >