Search Results

Search found 6460 results on 259 pages for 'spam filter'.

Page 4/259 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

• Server is sending SPAM but it's not an open relay

  - by alexandernst

  I have a problem with Dovecot + Postfix. My server is sending SPAM from the local user "dovecot", but my server is not configured as an open relay (mails can be sent without auth-ing only from localhost). Also, nobody except me, has SSH access to the server. How can I find what exactly is triggering all those SPAM mails? How can I get something like a backtrace that shows what exactly happened the moments before a SPAM email got in the queue of postfix? Regards

  Read the article

• Sending Emails via Google SMTP - after some time quit working

  - by Chris

  on a website I use PHPMailer to send automated registration emails, etc and also a newsletter-tool (which loops through the emails and sends them one by one). Also, I configured in Gmail under Settings and confirmed @mydomain addresses, so I can send from @mydomain emails without the gmail address being displayed. Furthermore I authorized the website to send mails with this link: https://accounts.google.com/DisplayUnlockCaptcha Now, after 2 month where everything worked perfectly fine, suddenly users started not to receive emails anymore and most recently emails are not even being sent anymore. Also, I received many error messages like this: Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 550 550 5.4.1 [email protected]: Recipient address rejected: Access Denied (state 13). When I check at this link: https://toolbox.googleapps.com/apps/checkmx/ It tells 2 none critical errors: Relayhost configuration detected. There SHOULD be a valid SPF record. So, the questions I would have were: does anybody have any hint why it stopped working, what the error messages mean? what to do to fix it? where do I set a SPF record (Cpanel?)? what is a relayhost and how to fix that? It is about 1000-1400 mails a day (gmail's limit is 2000). Also, what can I do wrong when setting up an SPF record? I've heard there are some testing tools for that. Thank you so much already in advance for your help!

  Read the article

• phpBB3 antispam: mod for "patrolling" the forum?

  - by STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED

  I've been working on various antispam measure in a phpBB3-based forum I host. Now I was thinking of an extension/mod that ties in with editing of posts (and later perhaps signatures/profiles) in that new text or edited text defaults to something like "not patrolled" and moderators could then in a special queue review text that contains links or similar item (based on heuristics). Now the question: does such a mod exist (I didn't find one)? If it does exist and anyone has used it (or them), please include your experiences with it in the answer.

  Read the article

• Recommendations for handling Directory Harvesting spam on Exchange 2003

  - by Aaron Alton

  Our Exchange server is getting slammed with anywhere between 450,000 and 700,000 spam messages per day. We receive about 1700 legitimate messages in the same time frame. Roughly 75% of the spam is directory harvesting. We currently have GFI MailEssentials installed. To it's credit, it's doing a very good job, but the sheer volume of spam that we're receiving, and the number of connections that our exchange server is making is preventing legitimate email from being delivered in a timely manner. GFI is set up to check for directory harvesting at the SMTP level, which I presume intercepts the mail before it hits the Exchange services , or goes through SMSE. This "module" is ordered at the top of the list, so (hopefully) dealing with the harvesting is consuming a minimum amount of server resources and bandwidth. My question is, is there anything I can do to prevent our Exchange server's connection pool from being eaten up by these spam hosts? We had to limit the number of concurrent connections being made by Exchange, because it was consuming all of our bandwidth. Thanks, in advance.

  Read the article

• Exclude filter from certain url's

  - by Mads Mobæk

  I'm using a filter in web.xml to check if a user is logged in or not: <filter> <filter-name>LoginFilter</filter-name> <filter-class>com.mycompany.LoginFilter</filter-class> </filter> <filter-mapping> <filter-name>LoginFilter</filter-name> <url-pattern>/*</url-pattern> </filter-mapping> And this works like a charm until I have a stylesheet or image I want to exclude from this filter. I know one approach is to put everything that's protected inside /privateor similar, and then set the url-pattern to: <url-pattern>/private/*</url-pattern>. The downside to this is my URLs now looking like: http://www.mycompany.com/private/mypage instead of http://www.mycompany.com/mypage. Is there another solution to this problem, that let me keep my pretty-urls?

  Read the article

• If spambots are filling out forms on my website, should I mark the mail as spam?

  - by rob

  Apparently spambots have discovered the contact forms my website. I'm considering adding a CAPTCHA, but in the meantime I've been getting dozens of completed website forms in my Gmail account each day. I know I can configure a filter to always allow e-mails from my website to be delivered (i.e., "never send to spam"), but I'm wondering whether there are also larger implications. At first, I was marking the spam forms as spam because I figured it would block the sender's e-mail address from getting through again. But since then, I've given it some more thought. I know many spam filters use Bayesian filters and other techniques to identify spam based on its content. If I mark all these e-mails as spam, will legitimate e-mails from my website be marked as spam? Even if I stop marking the messages as spam, I can see another potential problem. My form is pretty standard (in fact, it's probably very similar to other online forms). If I mark my spambot-submitted website forms as spam, will Gmail begin to mark other people's similar-looking messages as spam?

  Read the article

• User-trainable spam filtering with Exim and Dovecot

  - by pascal

  Currently I'm using Exim to deliver mails via dovecot-lda into Dovecot mailboxes. I'd like to add spam filtering, but I don't want to reject false-positives in Exim, and I want to train the bayesian filter from the client. So: How do I configure a spamd such that spam lands in a Junk folder, and when the user finds spam in their Inbox, or ham in their Junk, they move it to the correct box which trains the spamd. I have found dovecot-antispam but I'm not sure about its quality, it only seems to support dspam (and crm114, which is dead, last release August 2009).

  Read the article

• Spam is Killing Me - Can I use GMail as a spam filter?

  - by kirkouimet

  I'm getting at least 50 Viagra ads a day and it's driving me insane. I currently have a hosted MS Exchange account and a Gmail account. My Gmail account forwards to my Exchange account. Both of my addresses are used evenly, and it has been really nice to have all of my e-mail end up in my Exchange box. I like replying from one address consistently, which is my Exchange address. Spam sent to my Gmail address is always caught, where spam sent to my Exchange is getting passed straight through to me. I don't want to have two spam filtration systems that have quarantines that I need to check frequently for false positives. Here is my question: Can I setup my MX records such that all e-mail sent to my Exchange address is forwarded to my Gmail account, which will then forward it to my Exchange account? Kind of like using Gmail as the middle man.

  Read the article

• How can I explain to dspam that the user "brandon" is the same as "brandon@mydomain"

  - by Brandon Craig Rhodes

  I am using dspam for spam filtering by running the "dspamd" daemon under Ubuntu 9.10 and then setting up a Postfix rule that says: smtpd_recipient_restrictions = ... check_client_access pcre:/etc/postfix/dspam_everything ... where that PCRE map looks like this: /./ FILTER lmtp:[127.0.0.1]:11124 This works well, and means that all users on my system get all of their email, whether "dspam" thinks it is innocent or not, and have the option of filtering on its decisions or ignoring them. The problem comes when I want to train dspam using my email archives. After reading about the "dspam" command, I tried this on the files in my Inbox and spam boxes (which date from when I was using another filtering solution): for file in Mail/Inbox/*; do cat $file | dspam --class=innocent --source=corpus; done for file in Mail/spam/*; do cat $file | dspam --class=spam --source=corpus; done The symptom I noticed after doing all of this was that dspam was horrible at classifying spam — it couldn't find any! The problem, when I tracked it down, was that I was training the user "brandon" with the above commands, but the incoming email was instead compared against the username "brandon@mydomain", so it was running against a completely empty training database! So, what can I do to make the above commands actually train my fully-qualified email address rather than my bare username? I would like to avoid having to run "dspam" as root with a "--user" option. I would have expected that the "dspam" configuration files would have had an "append_domain" attribute or something with which to decorate local usernames with an appropriate email domain, but I can't find any such thing. When I used to use the Berkeley DB backend to "dspam", I solved this problem by creating a symlink from one of the databases to the other. :-) But that solution eventually died because the BDB backend is not thread-safe, so now I have moved to the PostgreSQL back-end and need a way to solve the problem there. And, no, the table where it keeps usernames has a UNIQUE constraint that prevents me from listing both usernames as mapping to the same ID. :-)

  Read the article

• GWB | Comment Spam On The Rise

  - by Geekswithblogs Administrator

  I don’t know a member on Geekswithblogs.net that is not frustrated with the amount of spam they get. It is a major problem that we have been dealing with for 6+ years and trying to come up with new ways to fight. As spammers get smarter, we have to continue to upgrade the tools we use to combat it. Just like any spam filter, sometimes good comments will get caught up. This has been a huge concern for some bloggers causing us to tame what we call spam and not spam. So this post is here just to state we know the spam problem is like a wave, sometimes it is not so bad, other times it gets worse. Right now it is worse. One measure we will take is a requirement for CAPTCHA soon if it continues since most members don’t clean up their spam via the admin tools (which are not the best tools, I know). Also I want to solicit a better approach from the members, what would you like the spam interface on GWB to be like? Be realistic cause we all want “Zero Spam, Good Comment live”. Related Tags: Geekswithblogs.net, Spam

  Read the article

• Gmail sends bulk messages sent by postfix to spam - spf, rDNS are set up (headers inside)

  - by snitko

  here are the headers of the blocked messages (actual domain replaced with domain.com, ip address with n.n.n.n and gmail account name with person.account): Delivered-To: [email protected] Received: by 10.216.89.137 with SMTP id c9cs247685wef; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 16:06:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.199.134 with SMTP id es6mr14447757qab.2.1323216395590; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 16:06:35 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: <[email protected]> Received: from mail.domain.com (domain.com. [n.n.n.n]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b16si7471407qcv.131.2011.12.06.16.06.35; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 16:06:35 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of [email protected] designates n.n.n.n as permitted sender) client-ip=n.n.n.n; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of [email protected] designates n.n.n.n as permitted sender) [email protected] Received: by mail.domain.com (Postfix, from userid 5001) id 26ADE381E3; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 19:06:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from domain.com (domain.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.domain.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0148638030 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 19:06:31 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 19:06:31 -0500 From: DomainApp <[email protected]> Reply-To: [email protected] To: [email protected] Message-ID: <[email protected]> Subject: Roman Snitko says hi Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-No-Spam: True Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: [email protected] Messages go to Spam folder on various gmail accounts, so it's not a coincidence. I followed all gmail guides on sending bulk emails from here https://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=81126. I also checked my ip-address here http://www.dnsblcheck.co.uk/ and it's NOT on the blacklists. Thus I have two questions: What may be the possible reason for the messages to go to Spam folder? Is there any way to contact Google and ask them what causes this? Update: I have set up openDKIM on my server, everything works, gmail message headers say that dkim=pass, which means everything is set up correctly. Messages still end up in Spam folder.

  Read the article

• postfix mail server and spam

  - by darko petreski

  Hi, I have a postfix mail server for our firm. The mails sent from this server to gmail and yahoo goes in spam. The postfix is configured on our server and it has never been used for spamming. Everything is configured as is should. The server works fine, the headers are as they should be. What should I do in order the messages not to go in spam ? Regards

  Read the article

• Running Hermes Anti-Spam Proxy Alongside Exchange 2003

  - by JohnyD

  I'm looking to implement an anti-spam solution to pre-process email destined for my Exchange 2003 server. I am interested in trying out the Hermes Anti-Spam Proxy product (the price is right) and was wondering if anyone has had any experience in running this alongside their Exchange installation (same physical box). The server is a Win2K3 box running a single core P4 D 930 @ 3GHz with 3 gigs of memory. Thank you.

  Read the article

• Reading Usenet w/o Spam

  - by user36720

  I'm trying to read comp.lang.javascript. The group seems to be active with decent content, but there is so much spam in there. Currently I'm reading it via Google Groups (http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.javascript/topics). Is there a way to read this group without the spam?

  Read the article

• Best Postfix spam RBL policy weight daemon?

  - by TRS-80

  I just heard about policyd-weight so I did an apt-cache search policyd which returns three options: policyd-weight postfix-policyd postfwd Which one is the best, and do you have any tips on setting them up? Our current setup is whitelister plus postgrey to greylist RBLd hosts, then fail2ban them for 10 minutes if they have 10 failures, followed by content filtering (Kaspersky Anti-Spam). The content filtering is pretty good, but there's still a lot of spam that gets through the RBL greylisting.

  Read the article

• Forward spam is dangerous for my domain repute?

  - by Memiux

  I have Postfix with spamassassin and forward the emails (including spam) to gmail.com, my problem is that when I send "legitimate" emails to gmail.com it is marked as spam, I've done everything that the guidelines said like signing with DKIM, setup a SPF for my domains, require authentication for outbound mails, etc. Now I wonder what I'm doing wrong?

  Read the article

• smtp(s) proxy to monitor outgoing spam

  - by Zulakis

  I am looking for a smtp proxy to install on our gateway which should monitor outgoing smtp traffic to identify the source of recently occuring spam attacks from our network. It would be enough if this could log all outgoing mails, no actual filtering must be done as I'm going to do this manually. Also, is it possible to monitor smtps ports 465 and 587 or is it necessary to completely block these ports to stop spam?

  Read the article

• PHP Filter, how to filter input array

  - by esryl

  I am using PHP filter to perfom basic sanitization and validation of form data. The principle problem I am having is that I mark my form up so that all the data is in one array for the POST input. e.g. form fields, page[name], page[slug], page[body], page[status], etc. Using the following: filter_input(INPUT_POST, 'page[name]', FILTER_SANITIZE_STRING); OR filter_input(INPUT_POST, "page['name']", FILTER_SANITIZE_STRING); I am unable to access the variable. Can someone please tell me the correct name to use to access array data using filter_input()

  Read the article

• Emails forwarded via postfix get flagged as spam and forged in Gmail

  - by Kendall Hopkins

  I'm trying to setup a forwarding only email server. I'm running into the problem where all messages forwarded via postfix are getting put into gmail's spam folder and getting flagged as forged. I'm testing a very similar setup on a cpanel box and their forwarded emails make it through without any problem. Things I've done: Setup reverse dns on forwarding box Setup SPF record for forwarding box domain CPanel route (not flagged as spam): [email protected] - [email protected] - [email protected] AWS postfix route (flagged as spam): [email protected] - [email protected] - [email protected] Gmail error message: /etc/postfix/main.cf myhostname = sputnik.*domain*.com smtpd_banner = $myhostname ESMTP $mail_name (Ubuntu) biff = no append_dot_mydomain = no readme_directory = no myorigin = /etc/mailname mydestination = sputnik.*domain*.com, localhost.*domain*.com, , localhost relayhost = mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 10.0.0.0/24 [::1]/128 [fe80::%eth0]/64 mailbox_size_limit = 0 recipient_delimiter = + inet_interfaces = all inet_protocols = all virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual Email forwarded by CPanel (doesn't get marked as spam): Delivered-To: *personaluser*@gmail.com Received: by 10.182.144.98 with SMTP id sl2csp14396obb; Wed, 9 May 2012 09:18:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.52.38 with SMTP id q6mr1137571obo.8.1336580316700; Wed, 09 May 2012 09:18:36 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <mail@*personaldomain*.com> Received: from web6.*domain*.com (173.193.55.66-static.reverse.softlayer.com. [173.193.55.66]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ec7si1845451obc.67.2012.05.09.09.18.36 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 09 May 2012 09:18:36 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 173.193.55.66 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of mail@*personaldomain*.com) client-ip=173.193.55.66; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 173.193.55.66 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of mail@*personaldomain*.com) smtp.mail=mail@*personaldomain*.com Received: from mail-vb0-f43.google.com ([209.85.212.43]:56152) by web6.*domain*.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from <mail@*personaldomain*.com>) id 1SS9b2-0007J9-LK for mail@kendall.*domain*.com; Wed, 09 May 2012 12:18:36 -0400 Received: by vbbfq11 with SMTP id fq11so599132vbb.2 for <mail@kendall.*domain*.com>; Wed, 09 May 2012 09:18:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=Hr0AH40uUtx/w/u9hltbrhHJhRaD5ubKmz2gGg44VLs=; b=IBKi6Xalr9XVFYwdkWxn9PLRB69qqJ9AjUPdvGh8VxMNW4S+hF6r4GJcGOvkDn2drO kw5r4iOpGuWUQPEMHRPyO4+Ozc9SE9s4Px2oVpadR6v3hO+utvFGoj7UuchsXzHqPVZ8 A9FS4cKiE0E0zurTjR7pfQtZT64goeEJoI/CtvcoTXj/Mdrj36gZ2FYtO8Qj4dFXpfu9 uGAKa4jYfx9zwdvhLzQ3mouWwQtzssKUD+IvyuRppLwI2WFb9mWxHg9n8y9u5IaduLn7 7TvLIyiBtS3DgqSKQy18POVYgnUFilcDorJs30hxFxJhzfTFW1Gdhrwjvz0MTYDSRiGQ P4aw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.173.209 with SMTP id bm17mr326586vdc.54.1336580315681; Wed, 09 May 2012 09:18:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.191.134 with HTTP; Wed, 9 May 2012 09:18:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [99.50.225.7] Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 12:18:35 -0400 Message-ID: <CA+tP6Viyn0ms5RJoqtd20ms3pmQCgyU0yy7GBiaALEACcDBC2g@mail.gmail.com> Subject: test5 From: Kendall Hopkins <mail@*personaldomain*.com> To: mail@kendall.*domain*.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec51b9bf5ee11c004bf9cda9c X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm3t1Hohu7fEr5zxQZsC8FQocg662Jv5MXlPXBnPnx2AiQrbLsNQNknLy39Su45xBMCM47K X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - web6.*domain*.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - kendall.*domain*.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - *personaldomain*.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: --bcaec51b9bf5ee11c004bf9cda9c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 test5 --bcaec51b9bf5ee11c004bf9cda9c Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 test5 --bcaec51b9bf5ee11c004bf9cda9c-- Email forwarded via AWS postfix box (marked as spam): Delivered-To: *personaluser*@gmail.com Received: by 10.182.144.98 with SMTP id sl2csp14350obb; Wed, 9 May 2012 09:17:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.137.143 with SMTP id w15mr389471qct.37.1336580266237; Wed, 09 May 2012 09:17:46 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <mail@*personaldomain*.com> Received: from sputnik.*domain*.com (sputnik.*domain*.com. [107.21.39.201]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o8si1330855qct.115.2012.05.09.09.17.46; Wed, 09 May 2012 09:17:46 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 107.21.39.201 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of mail@*personaldomain*.com) client-ip=107.21.39.201; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 107.21.39.201 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of mail@*personaldomain*.com) smtp.mail=mail@*personaldomain*.com Received: from mail-vb0-f52.google.com (mail-vb0-f52.google.com [209.85.212.52]) by sputnik.*domain*.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A308122AD6 for <mail@*personaldomain2*.com>; Wed, 9 May 2012 16:17:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vbzb23 with SMTP id b23so448664vbz.25 for <mail@*personaldomain2*.com>; Wed, 09 May 2012 09:17:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=XAzjH9tUXn6SbadVSLwJs2JVbyY4arosdTuV8Nv+ARI=; b=U8gIgHd6mhWYqPU4MH/eyvo3kyZsDn/GiYwZj5CLbs6Zz/ZOXQkenRi7zW3ewVFi/9 uAFylT8SQ+Wjw2l6OgAioCTojfZ58s4H/JW+1bu460KAP9aeOTcZDNSsHlsj0wvH5XRV 4DQJa11kz+WFVtVVcFuB33WVUPAgJfXzY+pSTe+FWsrZyrrwL7/Vm9TSKI5PBwRN9i4g zAZabgkmw1o2THT3kbJi6vAbPzlqK2LVbgt82PP0emHdto7jl4iD5F6lVix4U0dsrtRv xuGUE0gDyIwJuR4Q5YTkNubwGH/Y2bFBtpx2q1IORANrolWxIGaZSceUWawABkBGPABX 1/eg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.96.169 with SMTP id dt9mr282954vdb.107.1336580265812; Wed, 09 May 2012 09:17:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.191.134 with HTTP; Wed, 9 May 2012 09:17:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [99.50.225.7] Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 12:17:45 -0400 Message-ID: <CA+tP6VgqZrdxP543Y28d1eMwJAs4DxkS4EE6bvRL8nFoMkgnQQ@mail.gmail.com> Subject: test4 From: Kendall Hopkins <mail@*personaldomain*.com> To: mail@*personaldomain2*.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307f37f6f521b304bf9cd79d X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkrNcfSTWz9t6Ir87KEYyM+zJM4y1AbwP86NMXlk8B3ALhnis+olFCKdgPnwH/sIdzF3+Nh --20cf307f37f6f521b304bf9cd79d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 test4 --20cf307f37f6f521b304bf9cd79d Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 test4 --20cf307f37f6f521b304bf9cd79d--

  Read the article

• Spam bot constantly hitting our site 800-1,000 times a day. Causing loss in sales

  - by akaDanPaul

  For the past 5 months our site has been receiving hits from these 4 sites below; sheratonbd.com newsheraton.com newsheration.com newsheratonltd.com Typically the exact url they come from looks something like this; http://www.newsheraton.com/ClickEarnArea.aspx?loginsession_expiredlogin=85 The spam bot goes to our homepage and stays there for about 1 min and then exist. Luckily we have some pretty beefy servers so it hasn't even come close to overloading our servers yet. Last month I started blocking the IP address's of the spam bots but they seem to keep getting new ones everyday. So far I have blocked over 200 IP address's, below are a few of the ones I have blocked. They all come from Bangladesh. 58.97.238.214 58.97.149.132 180.234.109.108 180.149.31.221 117.18.231.5 117.18.231.12 Since this has been going on for the past 5 months our real site traffic has started to drop, and everyday our orders get lower and lower. Also since these spam bots simply go to our homepage and then leave our bounce rate in analytics has sky rocketed. My questions are; Is it possible that these spam bots are affecting our SEO? 60% of our orders come from natural search, and since this whole thing has started orders have slowly been dropping. What would be the reason someone would want to waste resources in doing this to our site? IP's aren't free and either are domain names, what would be the goal in doing this to us? We have google adwords but don't advertise on extended networks nor advertise in Bangladesh since we don't ship there so they are not making money on adsense. Has anyone experienced anything similar to this? What did you do and what was the final out come?

  Read the article

• Gmail.com detect mail as spam, but the server is not on any BlackList

  - by Tomer W

  I have an issue with Google. (GMail to be exact) About 1 month ago, we had a security breach, and mail was relayed through our servers. we got listed in almost ALL Black-Lists :( we fixed the problem, and requested removal from Black-lists, which was granted easily. currently (over 3 weeks), we are not sending any spam anymore. furthermore, we got clear from all the Black-lists (MxToolBox Black-List Search Result) But, GMail still refuse to get Anything from the server, stating '550 Spam'. Following, Telnet attempt to send to gmail: 220 mx.google.com ESMTP g47si45436208eep.123 helo megatec.co.il 250 mx.google.com at your service mail from: <[email protected]> 250 2.1.0 OK g47si45436208eep.123 rcpt to: <[email protected]> 250 2.1.5 OK g47si45436208eep.123 Data 354 Go ahead g47si45436208eep.123 Test123 . 550-5.7.1 [62.219.123.33 11] Our system has detected that this message is 550-5.7.1 likely unsolicited mail. To reduce the amount of spam sent to Gmail, 550-5.7.1 this message has been blocked. Please visit 550-5.7.1 http://support.google.com/mail/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=188131 for 550 5.7.1 more information. g47si45436208eep.123 Connection to host lost. i tried filling the form @ Gmail - Report Delivery Problem i also tried reaching Google by phone, but the message was to go to the Link mentioned above. I Checked ReverseDNS and is ok... We dont have TLS, but that shouldn't be a problem, shouldn't it? Note: we are not a Bulk sender. Anyone has an idea? what can be blocking our IP? Anyone know whom can be contacted in order to resolve this BL listing?

  Read the article

• Detect and delete spam email with Mac/Mail software

  - by prosseek

  I keep receiving the following email. It changes the sender, and contents a little bit all the time, so my spam filter doesn't filter it out. Is there any way to find this pattern to filter it out? My=Friend-Is=Looking-ForYou~On=TheWeb?~She~Likes~Your~Photos .,. http://2su.de/S0w --------------- the ought, inhumanity go sulphuret. No therefore. At do partner, shape! That easy-chair sympathetic.

  Read the article

• Detect and delete spam email with Mac/Mail software

  - by prosseek

  I keep receiving the following email. It changes the sender, and contents a little bit all the time, so my spam filter doesn't filter it out. Is there any way to find this pattern to filter it out? My=Friend-Is=Looking-ForYou~On=TheWeb?~She~Likes~Your~Photos .,. http://2su.de/S0w --------------- the ought, inhumanity go sulphuret. No therefore. At do partner, shape! That easy-chair sympathetic.

  Read the article

• Why are emails sent from my applications being marked as spam?

  - by Brian

  Hi. I have 2 web apps running on the same server. The first is www.nimikri.com and the other is www.hourjar.com. Both apps share the same IP address (75.127.100.175). My server is through a shared hosting company. I've been testing my apps, and at first all my emails were being delivered to me just fine. Then a few days ago every email from both apps got dumped into my spam box (in gmail and google apps). So far the apps have just been sending emails to me and nobody else, so I know people aren't manually flagging them as spam. I did a reverse DNS lookup for my IP and the results I got were these: 100.127.75.in-addr.arpa NS DNS2.GNAX.NET. 100.127.75.in-addr.arpa NS DNS1.GNAX.NET. Should the reverse DNS lookup point to nimikri.com and hourjar.com, or are they set up fine the way they are? I noticed in the email header these 2 lines: Received: from nimikri.nimikri.com From: Hour Jar <[email protected]> Would the different domain names be causing gmail to think this is spam? Here is the header from one of the emails. Please let me know if any of this looks like a red flag for spam. Thanks. Delivered-To: [email protected] Received: by 10.231.157.85 with SMTP id a21cs54749ibx; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 10:03:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.130.18 with SMTP id h18mr3056714ybn.186.1272214992196; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 10:03:12 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <[email protected]> Received: from nimikri.nimikri.com ([75.127.100.175]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 28si4358025gxk.44.2010.04.25.10.03.11; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 10:03:11 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 75.127.100.175 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) client-ip=75.127.100.175; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 75.127.100.175 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) [email protected] Received: from nimikri.nimikri.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by nimikri.nimikri.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o3PH3A7a029986 for <[email protected]>; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 12:03:11 -0500 Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 12:03:10 -0500 From: Hour Jar <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Message-ID: <[email protected]> Subject: [email protected] has invited you to New Event MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

  Read the article

• How to make a spam tester

  - by aquero

  In my project I need to make a spam tester to check the spam score of the mails prepared to be sent. When I searched, I found Spam Assassin, which they say is used as sapm filters in many mail servers. Can I create a spam tester using Spam Assassin? Another option I found is one Litmus API, which is a paid service. Is there any options other than these two? Freeware is more preferred. My project is a J2EE web application using Spring.

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >