Search Results

Search found 30556 results on 1223 pages for 'internet security'.

Page 40/1223 | < Previous Page | 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47  | Next Page >

  • Internet Explorer 9 beta installation problem

    - by Eric
    I'm running Vista SP2, x64. Because I wanted to test out the IE9 beta, I downloaded the English-language installer for 64-bit Vista systems. Running the installer is fine until it starts downloading required updates. The progress bar doesn't get far before it completely stops moving. Then after 20 minutes to an hour, it will tell me that there's an update I have to install, but as soon as I click OK it sends me an error message, telling me that it can't go to the url of the update which is here. So I manually enter it into my browser, which prompts me to download a standalone update. After that's been downloaded and I run it, it tells me that the update does not apply to my system. I'd appreciate any help to solving my problem.

    Read the article

  • How Can I Run Legacy Versions of Internet Explorer on Windows 8?

    - by Jason Fitzpatrick
    You’re sporting the newest edition of Windows but you need an older edition of Internet Explorer? Read on to see how you can wrangle a vintage browser into a modern operating system. Today’s Question & Answer session comes to us courtesy of SuperUser—a subdivision of Stack Exchange, a community-drive grouping of Q&A web sites. How To Delete, Move, or Rename Locked Files in Windows HTG Explains: Why Screen Savers Are No Longer Necessary 6 Ways Windows 8 Is More Secure Than Windows 7

    Read the article

  • How can I run update manager even if says "Check your internet connection."?

    - by onderbakirtas
    This problem caused last night when I try to update my distribution. I have no idea why this happened, just I think I have been updating with Bluetooth internet connection and it has down. I have an image related to this issue: http://i.stack.imgur.com/Z6RKU.png I have also tried a solution that has been written in this forum: http://ubuntuforums.org/archive/index.php/t-1648701.html I'm waiting for your assists. Thanks for now.

    Read the article

  • This file does not have a program associated with it for performing

    - by Abu Hamzah
    update 2: HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\folder ContentViewModeLayoutPatternForBrowse REG_SZ delta ContentViewModeForBrowse REG_SZ prop:~System.ItemNameDisplay;~System.LayoutPattern.PlaceHolder;~System.LayoutPattern.PlaceHolder;~System.LayoutPattern.PlaceHolder;System.DateModified ContentViewModeLayoutPatternForSearch REG_SZ alpha ContentViewModeForSearch REG_SZ prop:~System.ItemNameDisplay;System.DateModified;~System.ItemFolderPathDisplay (Default) REG_SZ Folder EditFlags REG_BINARY D2030000 FullDetails REG_SZ prop:System.PropGroup.Description;System.ItemNameDisplay;System.ItemTypeText;System.Size NoRecentDocs REG_SZ ThumbnailCutoff REG_DWORD 0x0 TileInfo REG_SZ prop:System.Title;System.ItemTypeText HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\folder\DefaultIcon (Default) REG_EXPAND_SZ %SystemRoot%\System32\shell32.dll,3 HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\folder\shell HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\folder\shell\explore HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\folder\shell\explore\command HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\folder\shell\open MultiSelectModel REG_SZ Document HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\folder\shell\open\command DelegateExecute REG_SZ {11dbb47c-a525-400b-9e80-a54615a090c0} (Default) REG_EXPAND_SZ %SystemRoot%\Explorer.exe HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\folder\shell\opennewprocess MUIVerb REG_SZ @shell32.dll,-8518 MultiSelectModel REG_SZ Document Extended REG_SZ LaunchExplorerFlags REG_DWORD 0x3 ExplorerHost REG_SZ {ceff45ee-c862-41de-aee2-a022c81eda92} HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\folder\shell\opennewprocess\command DelegateExecute REG_SZ {11dbb47c-a525-400b-9e80-a54615a090c0} HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\folder\shell\opennewwindow MUIVerb REG_SZ @shell32.dll,-8517 MultiSelectModel REG_SZ Document OnlyInBrowserWindow REG_SZ LaunchExplorerFlags REG_DWORD 0x1 HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\folder\shell\opennewwindow\command DelegateExecute REG_SZ {11dbb47c-a525-400b-9e80-a54615a090c0} HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\folder\ShellEx HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\folder\ShellEx\ColumnHandlers HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\folder\ShellEx\ColumnHandlers\{0561EC90-CE54-4f0c-9C55-E226110A740C} (Default) REG_SZ Haali Column Provider HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\folder\ShellEx\ColumnHandlers\{F9DB5320-233E-11D1-9F84-707F02C10627} (Default) REG_SZ PDF Column Info HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\folder\ShellEx\ContextMenuHandlers HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\folder\ShellEx\ContextMenuHandlers\Adobe.Acrobat.ContextMenu (Default) REG_SZ {D25B2CAB-8A9A-4517-A9B2-CB5F68A5A802} HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\folder\ShellEx\ContextMenuHandlers\BriefcaseMenu (Default) REG_SZ {85BBD920-42A0-1069-A2E4-08002B30309D} HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\folder\ShellEx\ContextMenuHandlers\ESET Smart Security - Context Menu Shell Extension (Default) REG_SZ {B089FE88-FB52-11D3-BDF1-0050DA34150D} HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\folder\ShellEx\ContextMenuHandlers\LavasoftShellExt (Default) REG_SZ {DCE027F7-16A4-4BEE-9BE7-74F80EE3738F} HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\folder\ShellEx\ContextMenuHandlers\Library Location (Default) REG_SZ {3dad6c5d-2167-4cae-9914-f99e41c12cfa} HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\folder\ShellEx\ContextMenuHandlers\MagicISO (Default) REG_SZ {DB85C504-C730-49DD-BEC1-7B39C6103B7A} HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\folder\ShellEx\ContextMenuHandlers\MBAMShlExt (Default) REG_SZ {57CE581A-0CB6-4266-9CA0-19364C90A0B3} HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\folder\ShellEx\ContextMenuHandlers\WinRAR (Default) REG_SZ {B41DB860-8EE4-11D2-9906-E49FADC173CA} HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\folder\ShellEx\ContextMenuHandlers\WS_FTP (Default) REG_SZ {797F3885-5429-11D4-8823-0050DA59922B} HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\folder\ShellEx\ContextMenuHandlers\XXX Groove GFS Context Menu Handler XXX (Default) REG_SZ {6C467336-8281-4E60-8204-430CED96822D} HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\folder\ShellEx\DragDropHandlers HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\folder\ShellEx\DragDropHandlers\WinRAR (Default) REG_SZ {B41DB860-8EE4-11D2-9906-E49FADC173CA} HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\folder\ShellEx\DragDropHandlers\{BD472F60-27FA-11cf-B8B4-444553540000} (Default) REG_SZ HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\folder\ShellEx\PropertySheetHandlers HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\folder\ShellEx\PropertySheetHandlers\BriefcasePage (Default) REG_SZ {85BBD920-42A0-1069-A2E4-08002B30309D} HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\folder\ShellNew Directory REG_SZ IconPath REG_EXPAND_SZ %SystemRoot%\system32\shell32.dll,3 ItemName REG_SZ @shell32.dll,-30396 MenuText REG_SZ @shell32.dll,-30317 NonLFNFileSpec REG_SZ @shell32.dll,-30319 HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\folder\ShellNew\Config AllDrives REG_SZ IsFolder REG_SZ NoExtension REG_SZ update: HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory AlwaysShowExt REG_SZ (Default) REG_SZ File Folder EditFlags REG_BINARY D2010000 FriendlyTypeName REG_SZ @shell32.dll,-10152 FullDetails REG_SZ prop:System.PropGroup.Description;System.DateCreated;System.FileCount;System.TotalFileSize InfoTip REG_SZ prop:System.Comment;System.DateCreated NoRecentDocs REG_SZ PreviewDetails REG_SZ prop:System.DateModified;*System.SharedWith;*System.OfflineAvailability;*System.OfflineStatus PreviewTitle REG_SZ prop:System.ItemNameDisplay;System.ItemTypeText HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\Background HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\Background\shell HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\Background\shell\cmd (Default) REG_SZ @shell32.dll,-8506 Extended REG_SZ NoWorkingDirectory REG_SZ HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\Background\shell\cmd\command (Default) REG_SZ cmd.exe /s /k pushd "%V" HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\Background\shellex HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\Background\shellex\ContextMenuHandlers HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\Background\shellex\ContextMenuHandlers\Gadgets (Default) REG_SZ {6B9228DA-9C15-419e-856C-19E768A13BDC} HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\Background\shellex\ContextMenuHandlers\igfxcui (Default) REG_SZ {3AB1675A-CCFF-11D2-8B20-00A0C93CB1F4} HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\Background\shellex\ContextMenuHandlers\New (Default) REG_SZ {D969A300-E7FF-11d0-A93B-00A0C90F2719} HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\Background\shellex\ContextMenuHandlers\Sharing (Default) REG_SZ {f81e9010-6ea4-11ce-a7ff-00aa003ca9f6} HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\Background\shellex\ContextMenuHandlers\XXX Groove GFS Context Menu Handler XXX (Default) REG_SZ {6C467336-8281-4E60-8204-430CED96822D} HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\DefaultIcon (Default) REG_EWindows Windows XPAND_SZ %SystemRoot%\System32\shell32.dll,3 HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\shell (Default) REG_SZ none HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\shell\cmd (Default) REG_SZ @shell32.dll,-8506 Extended REG_SZ NoWorkingDirectory REG_SZ HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\shell\cmd\command (Default) REG_SZ cmd.exe /s /k pushd "%V" HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\shell\find LegacyDisable REG_SZ SuppressionPolicy REG_DWORD 0x80 HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\shell\find\command (Default) REG_EWindows Windows XPAND_SZ %SystemRoot%\EWindows Windows XPlorer.exe DelegateExecute REG_SZ {a015411a-f97d-4ef3-8425-8a38d022aebc} HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\shell\find\ddeexec (Default) REG_SZ [FindFolder("%l", %I)] NoActivateHandler REG_SZ HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\shell\find\ddeexec\application (Default) REG_SZ Folders HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\shell\find\ddeexec\topic (Default) REG_SZ AppProperties HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\shell\OneNote.Open (Default) REG_SZ Open as Notebook in OneNote HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\shell\OneNote.Open\Command (Default) REG_SZ C:\PROGRA~1\Microsoft Office\Office12\ONENOTE.EXE "%L" HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\shellex HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\shellex\ContextMenuHandlers HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\shellex\ContextMenuHandlers\CuteFTP 8 Professional (Default) REG_SZ {8f7261d0-d2b9-11d2-9909-00605205b24c} HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\shellex\ContextMenuHandlers\EncryptionMenu (Default) REG_SZ {A470F8CF-A1E8-4f65-8335-227475AA5C46} HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\shellex\ContextMenuHandlers\MagicISO (Default) REG_SZ {DB85C504-C730-49DD-BEC1-7B39C6103B7A} HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\shellex\ContextMenuHandlers\Sharing (Default) REG_SZ {f81e9010-6ea4-11ce-a7ff-00aa003ca9f6} HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\shellex\ContextMenuHandlers\ShellExtension HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\shellex\ContextMenuHandlers\WinRAR (Default) REG_SZ {B41DB860-8EE4-11D2-9906-E49FADC173CA} HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\shellex\ContextMenuHandlers\XXX Groove GFS Context Menu Handler XXX (Default) REG_SZ {6C467336-8281-4E60-8204-430CED96822D} HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\shellex\ContextMenuHandlers\{596AB062-B4D2-4215-9F74-E9109B0A8153} HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\shellex\CopyHookHandlers HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\shellex\CopyHookHandlers\FileSystem (Default) REG_SZ {217FC9C0-3AEA-1069-A2DB-08002B30309D} HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\shellex\CopyHookHandlers\Sharing (Default) REG_SZ {40dd6e20-7c17-11ce-a804-00aa003ca9f6} HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\shellex\DragDropHandlers HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\shellex\DragDropHandlers\WinRAR (Default) REG_SZ {B41DB860-8EE4-11D2-9906-E49FADC173CA} HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\shellex\DragDropHandlers\WS_FTP (Default) REG_SZ {1D83C7B3-C931-4850-BED0-D3FE8B3F5808} HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\shellex\PropertySheetHandlers HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\shellex\PropertySheetHandlers\Sharing (Default) REG_SZ {f81e9010-6ea4-11ce-a7ff-00aa003ca9f6} HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\shellex\PropertySheetHandlers\{1f2e5c40-9550-11ce-99d2-00aa006e086c} HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\shellex\PropertySheetHandlers\{4a7ded0a-ad25-11d0-98a8-0800361b1103} HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\shellex\PropertySheetHandlers\{596AB062-B4D2-4215-9F74-E9109B0A8153} HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\shellex\PropertySheetHandlers\{ECCDF543-45CC-11CE-B9BF-0080C87CDBA6} HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Directory\shellex\PropertySheetHandlers\{ef43ecfe-2ab9-4632-bf21-58909dd177f0} (Default) REG_SZ I updated my IE9 from IE8 and after I reboot my machine and try to access my computer drive and I get this error message whenever I try to double click c:\ drive or other drives but other than that everything seems to be working fince except that I can not access my drives.... its very strange any help? <<<This file does not have a program associated with it for performing this action. Please install a program or, if one is already installed, create an association in the Default Programs control panel>>> using Windows 7 32 bit

    Read the article

  • ssh port forwarding / security risk

    - by jcooper
    Hi there, I want to access a web application running on a web server behind my office firewall from an external machine. We have a bastion host running sshd that is accessible from the Internet. I want to know if this solution is a bad idea: Create an account on the bastion host with shell=/bin/false and no password ('testuser') Create a ssh RSA key on the external machine Add the public RSA key to the testuser's authorized_keys file ssh to the bastion host from the external host using: ssh -N 8888:targethost:80 run my tests from the external host shut down the ssh tunnel I understand that if my RSA private key were compromised then someone could ssh to the bastion host. But are there other reasons this solution is a bad idea? thank you!

    Read the article

  • Database/Web Server and SQL Server Setup - Security?

    - by Jess
    This seems really basic, but I couldn't find an answer already ... we are looking to deploy a website to an IIS server, and a database to a separate server. We aren't sure how to best secure this for access by internal users and internet. The IIS Server is not connected to the domain, and neither is the database at the moment. Should it be? Also, if we use SQL Server authentication instead of Windows Authentication, should we just hard-code the user/password into our internal apps?

    Read the article

  • mystery Internet traffic to port 445

    - by Ben Collver
    Recently, I noticed traffic from the office network to TCP port 445 on the Internet [a]. Below are the Linux firewall log entries to Facebook's network [b] and Google's network [c]. I would like to identify the source of this traffic. My first guess is that Facebook and Google might be using multiple TCP ports for SSL load balancing. However, I could not confirm this based on the web proxy logs. What else might it be? [a] http://support.microsoft.com/kb/204279 [b] Sep 4 08:30:03 firewall01 kernel: IN=eth0 OUT=eth2 SRC=10.0.0.131 DST=69.171.237.34 LEN=52 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=127 ID=14287 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=51711 DPT=445 WINDOW=8192 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 [c] Aug 28 06:02:41 firewall01 kernel: IN=eth0 OUT=eth2 SRC=10.0.0.115 DST=173.194.33.47 LEN=52 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=127 ID=4558 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=49294 DPT=445 WINDOW=8192 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0

    Read the article

  • Apache Request IP Based Security

    - by connec
    I run an Apache server on my home system that I've made available over the internet as I'm not always at my home system. Naturally I don't want all my home server files public, so until now I've simply had: Order allow, deny Deny from all Allow from 127.0.0.1 in my core configuration and just Allow from all in the htaccess of any directories I wanted publicly viewable. However I've decided a better system would be to centralise all the access control and just require authentication (HTTP basic) for requests not to 127.0.0.1/localhost. Is this achievable with Apache/modules? If so how would I go about it? Cheers.

    Read the article

  • Installing a personal security certificate for Windows Server 2008 Terminal Services user

    - by Rick
    We use StoneEdge Order Manager, which runs under Microsoft Access, on several Windows computers as well as through Terminal Services on Windows Server 2008. Terminal Services users are unable to process credit cards using the First Data Global Gateway on the server. We have followed the necessary setup instructions provided under the user account, which involves adding a certificate in the Internet Options control panel. The Windows XP desktops require this to be done, or a generic 'unable to connect' message is shown when attempting to charge a card. On the server, this message is shown regardless of whether the certificate has been installed. Is there anything else that needs to be done that is specific to Windows Server that is not mentioned in the workstation instructions? Setup Instructions

    Read the article

  • Security and the Mobile Workforce

    - by tobyehatch
    Now that many organizations are moving to the BYOD philosophy (bring your own devices), security for phones and tablets accessing company sensitive information is of paramount importance. I had the pleasure to interview Brian MacDonald, Principal Product Manager for Oracle Business Intelligence (BI) Mobile Products, about this subject, and he shared some wonderful insight about how the Oracle Mobile Security Tool Kit is addressing mobile security and doing some pretty cool things.  With the rapid proliferation of phones and tablets, there is a perception that mobile devices are a security threat to corporate IT, that mobile operating systems are not secure, and that there are simply too many ways to inadvertently provide access to critical analytic data outside the firewall. Every day, I see employees working on mobile devices at the airport, while waiting for their airplanes, and using public WIFI connections at coffee houses and in restaurants. These methods are not typically secure ways to access confidential company data. I asked Brian to explain why. “The native controls for mobile devices and applications are indeed insufficiently secure for corporate deployments of Business Intelligence and most certainly for businesses where data is extremely critical - such as financial services or defense - although it really applies across the board. The traditional approach for accessing data from outside a firewall is using a VPN connection which is not a viable solution for mobile. The problem is that once you open up a VPN connection on your phone or tablet, you are creating an opening for the whole device, for all the software and installed applications. Often the VPN connection by itself provides insufficient encryption – if any – which means that data can be potentially intercepted.” For this reason, most organizations that deploy Business Intelligence data via mobile devices will only do so with some additional level of control. So, how has the industry responded? What are companies doing to address this very real threat? Brian explained that “Mobile Device Management (MDM) and Mobile Application Management (MAM) software vendors have rapidly created solutions for mobile devices that provide a vast array of services for controlling, managing and establishing enterprise mobile usage policies. On the device front, vendors now support full levels of encryption behind the firewall, encrypted local data storage, credential management such as federated single-sign-on as well as remote wipe, geo-fencing and other risk reducing features (should a device be lost or stolen). More importantly, these software vendors have created methods for providing these capabilities on a per application basis, allowing for complete isolation of the application from the mobile operating system. Finally, there are tools which allow the applications themselves to be distributed through enterprise application stores allowing IT organizations to manage who has access to the apps, when updates to the applications will happen, and revoke access after an employee leaves. So even though an employee may be using a personal device, access to company data can be controlled while on or near the company premises. So do the Oracle BI mobile products integrate with the MDM and MAM vendors? Brian explained that our customers use a wide variety of mobile security vendors and may even have more than one in-house. Therefore, Oracle is ensuring that users have a choice and a mechanism for linking together Oracle’s BI offering with their chosen vendor’s secure technology. The Oracle BI Mobile Security Toolkit, which is a version of the Oracle BI Mobile HD application, delivered through the Oracle Technology Network (OTN) in its component parts, helps Oracle users to build their own version of the Mobile HD application, sign it with their own enterprise development certificates, link with their security vendor of choice, then deploy the combined application through whichever means they feel most appropriate, including enterprise application stores.  Brian further explained that Oracle currently supports most of the major mobile security vendors, has close relationships with each, and maintains strong partnerships enabling both Oracle and the vendors to test, update and release a cooperating solution in lock-step. Oracle also ensures that as new versions of the Oracle HD application are made available on the Apple iTunes store, the same version is also immediately made available through the Security Toolkit on OTN.  Rest assured that as our workforce continues down the mobile path, company sensitive information can be secured.  To listen to the entire podcast, click here. To learn more about the Oracle BI Mobile HD, click  here To learn more about the BI Mobile Security Toolkit, click here 

    Read the article

  • Mac Management and Security

    - by Bart Silverstrim
    I was going through some literature on managing OS X laptops and asked someone some questions about usage scenarios when using the MacBooks. I asked someone more knowledgeable than I about whether it was possible for my Mac to be taken over if I were visiting another site for a conference or if I went on a wifi network at a local coffee house with policies from an OS X Server with workgroup manager (either legit for the site or someone running a version of OS X Server on hardware they have hidden somewhere on the network), which apparently could be set up to do things like limit my access to Finder or impose other neat whiz-bang management features. He said that it is indeed possible for it to happen as it would be assigned via the DHCP server and the OS X server would assume my Mac is a guest and could hand out restrictions and apparently my Mac will happily accept them without notifying me or giving me an option, unlike Windows which I believe would need to be joined to a domain before it becomes "managed" by Active Directory. So my question is as network admins and sysadmins with users traveling with MacBooks, is there a way to reasonably protect your users from having their machines hijacked without resorting to just turning off networking all the time? Or isn't this much of a security hazard? What threat does this pose to the road warriors in your businesses?

    Read the article

  • Online Storage and security concerns

    - by Megge
    I plan to set up a small fileserver. I already own a small server at HostEurope (VirtualServer L, 250GB space), but they don't offer enough space (there is the HostEurope Cloud, but paying for bandwidth isn't an option here, video-streaming should be possible) Requirements summarized: Storage: 2TB, Users: ~15, Filesizes: < 100GB, should be easily reachable (Mount as a networkdrive or at least have solid "communication" software) My first question would be: Where can I get halfway affordable online storages? And how should I connect them to my server? Getting an additional server is a bit overkill, as I know no hoster which allows 2 TB on a small 2 Ghz Dual Core 2 GB RAM thingy (that would be enough by far, I just need much space), and connecting it via NFS or FTP over Internet seems a bit strange and cripples performance. Do you have any advice where I could get that storage service from? (I sent HostEurope a custom request today, but they didn't answer till now. If they can provide me with that space, this question will be irrelevant, but the 2nd one is the more important one anway, don't do much more than recommend me some based on experience, you don't have to crawl hours through hosting services) livedrive for example offers 5 TB for 17€ / month, I'd be happy with 2 TB for 20 €, the caveat is: It doesn't allow multiple users, which leads me to my second question: Where are the security problems? Which protocol is sufficient (I want private and "public" folders etc. the usual "every user has its own and a public space"-thing), secure and fast? (I'd tend to (S)FTP, problem with FTP is: Most of those hosting services don't even allow FTP with mutliple users and single users lead me into "hacking" a solution (you could map the basic folder structure on the main server and just mount every subfolder from the storage, things get difficult with a public folder with 644 permissions though) Is useing something like PKI or 802.1X overkill for private uses?

    Read the article

  • Managing Apache to Compensate for WebDAV's Security Masking

    - by Tohuw
    When a user creates a file via WebDAV, the default behavior is that the file is owned by the user and group running the Apache process, with a umask of 022. Unfortunately, this makes it impossible for unprivileged users to write to the files by other means without being a member of the group Apache runs under (which strikes me as a particularly bad idea). My current solution is to set umask 000 in Apache's envvars and remove all world permissions from the webdav parent directory for the user. So, if the WebDAV share is /home/foo/www, then /home/foo/www is owned by www-data:foo with permissions of 770. This keeps other unprivileged users out, more or less, but it's hokey at best and a security disaster awaiting at worst. From my research and poking around at mod_dav and Apache, I cannot find a reasonable solution short of a cron job flipping all the permissions back (I'd rather not have the load and increased complexity on the server). SuExec won't work, either, because WebDAV operations are not going to execute as a different user. Any thoughts on this? Thank you.

    Read the article

  • Microsoft Security Essentials & MsMpEng.exe hogging resources

    - by Mike
    I've been using MSE for a couple months now, never had a single problem. All of a sudden the process "MsMpEng.exe" will randomly go crazy and hog all my system resources so I can't do anything unless I kill it in the task manager. (I've quit the program for now and my comp is running smooth). When I restart the program, reboot, whatever, it goes off and hogs all the resources again after a couple minutes. If I kill the process it will go away and then come back a couple minutes later and do the same thing. I've scanned with MSE, another antivirus and malware with no probs. Any ideas? Should I uninstall and find something else? The thing is I've liked it so far. I'm running Win7 64-bit. Also, I'm not running any other conflicting security programs. This is the only one on my PC right now. Windows Defender is also off.

    Read the article

  • Mac Management Without Permission and Security

    - by Bart Silverstrim
    I was going through some literature on managing OS X laptops and asked someone some questions about usage scenarios when using the MacBooks. I asked someone more knowledgeable than I about whether it was possible for my Mac to be taken over if I were visiting another site for a conference or if I went on a wifi network at a local coffee house with policies from an OS X Server with workgroup manager (either legit for the site or someone running a version of OS X Server on hardware they have hidden somewhere on the network), which apparently could be set up to do things like limit my access to Finder or impose other neat whiz-bang management features. He said that it is indeed possible for it to happen as it would be assigned via the DHCP server and the OS X server would assume my Mac is a guest and could hand out restrictions and apparently my Mac will happily accept them without notifying me or giving me an option, unlike Windows which I believe would need to be joined to a domain before it becomes "managed" by Active Directory. So my question is as network admins and sysadmins with users traveling with MacBooks, is there a way to reasonably protect your users from having their machines hijacked without resorting to just turning off networking all the time? Or isn't this much of a security hazard? What threat does this pose to the road warriors in your businesses?

    Read the article

  • Resources for Smartphone Security

    - by Shial
    My organization is currently working on improving our data and network security due to increasing HIPAA laws and a general need to get a better grasp on controlling our health related information. We are a non-profit working with people with developmental disabilities so we handle a lot of medical related information. One area that has been identified as a risk is our use of smartphones, specifically at this time Windows Mobile 6.1 devices from T-Mobile. We do not utilize the VPNs on the phones so there isn't any way they can access our databases or file servers (username/password for VPNs is not the domain logons). What would be exposed however is the particular user's email account since you could extract out the username/password and access the email either on the device or on our web email (Exchange 2003) which could contain HIPAA protected confidential information about clients and services and this would be an incident that would have to be reported. What resources or ideas would help us secure these devices? I'm not worried about data interception (using SSL) but more about physical theft or loss of the device. Are there websites that I just have not found with guidelines and suggestions or particualar products that would help protect us? I also don't want to limit the discussion to windows Mobile either. I myself am looking at an android 2.0 device and there is always the eventual possibility we could get pushed to enable the VPNs. I know this is a subject that likely won't have any particular correct answer and it is something we should all be aware of since there devices are sitting outside of our immediate control most of the time.

    Read the article

  • Can I disable this Windows (XP) Security Warning?

    - by FumbleFingers
    I recently reformatted my hard drive and reinstalled Windows XP (I know I'll have to take the plunge and commit to Win8 "real soon, now", but I'm just not quite ready for the upheaval yet! :) I used to use WinRar (and later, when I got fed up with the "nag" messages, 7-Zip), but I haven't installed either of them in my new configuration, so I must be using the built-in XP facility when I open *.zip files. For years, I've been opening downloaded *.zip archives, and using "drag & drop" to copy to a File Explorer window open on the folder where I want the files to end up (usually, My Documents\Downloads). But now I find that when I "drop" the file(s), I get a pop-up Windows Security Warning saying Are you sure you want to copy or move files to this folder? You should only move or copy files from locations that you trust Can anyone explain why I'm getting this message, and is there any (reasonably easy, please! :) way to suppress it? Since I've already put the *.zip file on my computer, it seems a bit late to ask if I trust it. (Thus far, the files in question have always been plain text, so it's not a matter of dodgy programs, etc.) Apologies for the low quality image - I don't have the appropriate tools or knowledge to do any better, and it doesn't help that my "PrtScr" screen capture has included what would have been on my second monitor (TV) if it had been turned on. If you can't read it, trust me - I have copied the text verbatim.

    Read the article

  • Securing SSH/SFTP and best practices on security

    - by MultiformeIngegno
    I'm on a fresh VPS with Ubuntu Server 12.04. I wanted to ask you the good practices to apply to enhance security over a stock Ubuntu-server. This is what I did up to now: I added Google Authenticator to SSH, then I created a new user (whom I'll use instead of 'root' for SSH & SFTP access) which I added to my /etc/sudoers list below 'root', so now it's: # User privilege specification root ALL=(ALL:ALL) ALL new_user ALL=(ALL:ALL) ALL Then I edited sshd_config and set PermitRootLogin to 'no'. Then restarted the ssh service. Is this ok? There are a few things I'd like to ask you though: 1) What's the sense of adding a new (sudoer) user whilst the root user still exist (ok it can't access with root privilege but it's still there..)? 2) System files are owned by 'root'.. I want to use my new_user to access via SFTP but with it I can't edit those files!! Should I mass-CHMOD 'em so that new_user has write perms too? What's the good practice on this? Thanks in advance, I hope you'll tell me if I did something wrong and/or other ways to secure the system. :)

    Read the article

  • Windows 2008 server smart card security module problem

    - by chris13work
    Hi, I've got a smart card reader and a server application using it as a security module. If I run it under DOS prompt, everything is fine. The server is running and clients can connect to it. I tried to install the server as window service and start it. The server starts but always gives back authentication error because it cannot call the smart card to do encryption. Then I tried to start it with task scheduler and set the trigger factor as "on startup". The server starts also but still cannot access the smart card reader. Then I tried remote desktop to the machine and run the server application under DOS prompt. Same error is returned. The situation is that the smart card reader only works under active console desktop environment. In the server application, WINSCARD API is used to access the smart card reader. Any suggestion so that we can access the smart card reader in running services? OS: Windows Server 2008 Smart Card Driver: Windows USB smart card Reader Smart Card API: WINSCARD

    Read the article

  • Windows 2008 server smart card security module problem

    - by chris13work
    Hi, I've got a smart card reader and a server application using it as a security module. If I run it under DOS prompt, everything is fine. The server is running and clients can connect to it. I tried to install the server as window service and start it. The server starts but always gives back authentication error because it cannot call the smart card to do encryption. Then I tried to start it with task scheduler and set the trigger factor as "on startup". The server starts also but still cannot access the smart card reader. Then I tried remote desktop to the machine and run the server application under DOS prompt. Same error is returned. The situation is that the smart card reader only works under active console desktop environment. In the server application, WINSCARD API is used to access the smart card reader. Any suggestion so that we can access the smart card reader in running services? OS: Windows Server 2008 Smart Card Driver: Windows USB smart card Reader Smart Card API: WINSCARD

    Read the article

  • Hiding subfolders from users with Windows Server security

    - by Frans
    Using Windows Server 2008. I would like to allow all users to map to a common network drive and be able to browse it. But, I only want them to be able to see the subfolders they actually have access rights to. Is this doable? Example I have a share with two folders on it; \\domain\share\FolderA \\domain\share\FolderB With three different security groups, I would like to map a network drive for all three to \\domain\share. However, for group1, I want them to only be able to see FolderA, group2 should only see FolderB and group3 should see both. I am not just talking about denying access to the actual folder, which is easy enough, I don't want the user to even be able to see that the folder exists. In other words, when group 1 logs in and do "dir n:\" they should see N:\FolderA When group 2 logs in, they should see N:\FolderB and when group 3 logs in they should see N:\Folder A N:\Folder B My half-baked solution If I completely block access to the root then I can't map a drive to it. I can give everyone the traverse right which then allows the user to map a drive. However, if a member of group1 or group2 tries to go to "N:\" they get an access denied error. If they go to N:\FolderA (for group1) then it works. So, that sort of works, but it would be nicer if the user could actually browse to N:\ and just only see the subfolders they have access to. I am pretty sure I have seen this done but not sure how to do it myself. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Webcam security camera software that runs as a service

    - by hurfdurf
    I've been looking for Windows webcam software that will run as a Windows service without any user login. The goal is to use the webcam as a cheap security camera and log the results to secure networked storage (windows share, not FTP). The requirements are: Motion detection Video capture Runs as a service (should start recording immediately after reboot) Nice to have: Round-robin storage, e.g. 10Gb limit, oldest files overwritten/deleted when space gets low I've read the other webcam questions but still haven't stumbled across anything suitable. Evaluations thus far: Title MotionDetect Service Snapshots Video SpaceLimit License Yawcam Yes Yes Yes No No GPL WebCam ZoneTrigger Yes No Yes Yes No Commercial Dorgem Yes No Yes Yes No GPL AbelCam Yes No Yes Yes No Commercial Logitech Yes No Yes Yes No Paired with camera IspyConnect Yes No Yes Yes Yes Free SecureCam (SourcefoYes No Yes Yes No GPL AbelCam Yes No Yes Yes No Commercial Active WebCam Yes Yes(?) Yes Yes Volume Free Commercial WebCam Surveyor Yes No Yes Yes No Commercial WebCamsPy NA NA NA NA NA GPL Camera: Logitech Webcam Pro 9000 Windows 7 32-bit WebCamsPy failed to initialize so couldn't be tested So far, the contenders: Active Webcam comes the closest, and claims to run as a service, but i haven't been able to get it to record after a cold boot even though a service is running. Yawcam can be set up as a service but doesn't record video. IspyConnect has exactly the type of space limit I want and looks great, but doesn't run as a service (seems also to be a bit of a cpu hog) Any other suggestions? I'm locked into Windows so can't use linux Motion, which looks almost perfect. Any pointers to rich Windows webcam/motion detection libraries out there that could easily be turned into a command line program would also be appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Linux security: The dangers of executing malignant code as a standard user

    - by AndreasT
    Slipping some (non-root) user a piece of malignant code that he or she executes might be considered as one of the highest security breaches possible. (The only higher I can see is actually accessing the root user) What can an attacker effectively do when he/she gets a standard, (let's say a normal Ubuntu user) to execute code? Where would an attacker go from there? What would that piece of code do? Let's say that the user is not stupid enough to be lured into entering the root/sudo password into a form/program she doesn't know. Only software from trusted sources is installed. The way I see it there is not really much one could do, is there? Addition: I partially ask this because I am thinking of granting some people shell (non-root) access to my server. They should be able to have normal access to programs. I want them to be able to compile programs with gcc. So there will definitely be arbitrary code run in user-space...

    Read the article

  • Security failure - This is not a secure document but has security embed parameters

    - by dimitris mistriotis
    I try to create a private version and therefore I used something like this in php: var scribd_doc = scribd.Document.getDoc( 28394353, 'xxx'); scribd_doc.addParam("use_ssl", true); scribd_doc.addParam('public', false); scribd_doc.grantAccess("cbccf6e7-1ff7-9034-8a7c-a0c2a5b225ed", <?php echo "'" . trim($_COOKIE['PHPSESSID']) . "'" ?>, <?php echo "'" . scribd_calculate_signature($documentID = '28394353', $sessionID = trim($_COOKIE['PHPSESSID']), $userID = "cbccf6e7-1ff7-9034-8a7c-a0c2a5b225ed") . "'" ?>); ... ... scribd_doc.write( 'embedded_flash' ); Which is the api of scribd for javascript with the addition of the signature. My result is the "Security failure - This is not a secure document but has security embed parameters" Error, which is not well documented. The document is set to private. Any ideas?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47  | Next Page >