Search Results

Search found 21392 results on 856 pages for 'order of operations'.

Page 41/856 | < Previous Page | 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48  | Next Page >

  • Algorithm - combine multiple lists, resulting in unique list and retaining order

    - by hitch
    I want to combine multiple lists of items into a single list, retaining the overall order requirements. i.e.: 1: A C E 2: D E 3: B A D result: B A C D E above, starting with list 1, we have ACE, we then know that D must come before E, and from list 3, we know that B must come before A, and D must come after B and A. If there are conflicting orderings, the first ordering should be used. i.e. 1: A C E 2: B D E 3: F D result: A C B D E F 3 conflicts with 2, therefore requirements for 2 will be used. If ordering requirements mean an item must come before or after another, it doesn't matter if it comes immediately before or after, or at the start or end of the list, as long as overall ordering is maintained. This is being developed using VB.Net, so a LINQy solution (or any .Net solution) would be nice - otherwise pointers for an approach would be good.

    Read the article

  • How to change order in ordered+persisted collection?

    - by Jaroslav Záruba
    I just need to change order of items in a (previously persisted) ordered collection... I tried simply passing the re-arranged collection to a setter: after committing a transaction the collection is gone. Then I tried to clear() the existing collection and addAll() afterwards: clear() makes persistent manager to mark all the elements as deleted. (But obviously I would like to be able to work with the collection items in the very transaction.) (The collection is not in a default fetch group, so I tried the above also with the named fetch group added into the fetch plan. No luck.) This must be the most stupid question, but I ran out of ideas and I'm stuck here two days already. I swear I googled. :(

    Read the article

  • perl order of opendir return results?

    - by ojblass
    opendir MYDIR, "$dir"; my @FILES = readdir MYDIR; closedir MYDIR; It appears that 99.9 % of the time the first two entries in the array are always “.” and “..”. Later logic in the script has issues if it is not true. I ran into a case where the directory entries appeared later. Is this indicative of the file system being corrupt or something else? Is there a known order to what opendir returns?

    Read the article

  • Find valid assignments of integers in arrays (permutations with given order)

    - by evident
    Hi everybody! I am having a general problem finding a good algorithm for generating each possible assignment for some integers in different arrays. Lets say I have n arrays and m numbers (I can have more arrays than numbers, more numbers than arrays or as much arrays as numbers). As an example I have the numbers 1,2,3 and three arrays: { }, { }, { } Now I would like to find each of these solutions: {1,2,3}, { }, { } { }, {1,2,3}, { } { }, { }, {1,2,3} {1,2}, {3}, { } {1,2}, { }, {3} { }, {1,2}, {3} {1}, {2,3}, { } {1}, { }, {2,3} { }, {1}, {2,3} {1}, {2}, {3} So basically I would like to find each possible combination to assign the numbers to the different arrays with keeping the order. So as in the example the 1 always needs to come before the others and so on... I want to write an algorithm in C++/Qt to find all these valid combinations. Does anybody have an approach for me on how to handle this problem? How would I generate these permutations?

    Read the article

  • linq multiple order DESCENDING

    - by ile
    .OrderBy(y => y.Year).ThenBy(m => m.Month); How to set descending order? EDIT: I tried this: var result = (from dn in db.DealNotes where dn.DealID == dealID group dn by new { month = dn.Date.Month, year = dn.Date.Year } into date orderby date.Key.year descending orderby date.Key.month descending select new DealNoteDateListView { DisplayDate = date.Key.month + "-" + date.Key.year, Month = date.Key.month, Year = date.Key.year, Count = date.Count() }) //.OrderBy(y => y.Year).ThenBy(m => m.Month) ; And it seems working. Is it wrong to use orderby twice like I used it here?

    Read the article

  • usedefaultcredentials in order to call DirectoryEntry

    - by Copeleto
    Hi, I am working in a Login page and teh logic is like - try { DirectoryEntry LDAPLogin = new DirectoryEntry(ConfigurationSettings.AppSettings ["LDAPPath"].ToString(), Usuario, Txt_Contrasenia.Text.ToString()); if (LDAPLogin.NativeGuid != LDAPLogin.Name) ValidarGrupo(); } catch (Exception exc) { Label_Info.Text = "Sus credenciales no son validas: " + Usuario.ToString() + " " + exc.Message; } If the user enters the rights credentials I call a method ValidarGrupo that implements a lookup in the AD for a group of the user I woould like to replace the username and password with UseDefaultCredentials in order to avoid that the user has to enter the username and password and the Login pages use the credentials of the user that is login on the machine.

    Read the article

  • How to execute statements in order in objective c

    - by Vu Tu?n Anh
    When i tap on my button, my function was called [myBtn addTarget:self action:@selector(myFunction) forControlEvents:UIControlEventTouchUpInside]; In my function, a collection of complex statement will be executed and take a litte bit time to run, so i want to show Loading (UIActivityIndicatorView) as the following: -(void) addTradeAction { //Show Loading [SharedAppDelegate showLoading]; //disable user interaction self.view.userInteractionEnabled = NO; //execute call webservice in here - may be take 10s //Hide Loading [ShareAppDelegate hideLoading]; } When tap on myBtn (my Button) - after 3s or 4s, [ShareAppDelegate showLoading] was called. It is unusual when i use [ShareAppDelegate showLoading] on other Function, - it work very nice, i mean all the statement be executed in order. All i want, when i tap on My Button, Loading will be called immediatelly. Tks in advance

    Read the article

  • How to order the items in a nested LINQ-provided collection

    - by Carson McComas
    I've got a (SQL Server) database table called Category. And another database table called SubCategory. SubCategory has a foreign key relationship to Category. Because of this, thanks to LINQ, each Cateogory has a property called SubCategories and LINQ is nice enough to return all the SubCategories associated with my Category when I grab it. If I want to sort the Categories alphabetically, I can just do: return db.Categories.OrderBy(c => c.Name); However, I have no idea how to order the SubCategories collection inside each Category. My goal is to return a collection of Categories, where all of the SubCategory collections inside of them are ordered alphabetically by Name.

    Read the article

  • [jqueryui] Sorttable ul li get order

    - by Shishant
    Hello, My html is like this <ul> <li>...</li> <li> <ul> <li>...</li> </ul> </li> </ul> This is just a example, a ul can contain many li but the max depth is ul li ul like in example I am using JqueryUI Sortable to sort this li I want to get the sort order of the li to store it in database so that user dont have to sort each time. Thank You.

    Read the article

  • Most optimal order (of joins) for left join

    - by Ram
    I have 3 tables Table1 (with 1020690 records), Table2(with 289425 records), Table 3(with 83692 records).I have something like this SELECT * FROM Table1 T1 /* OK fine select * is bad when not all columns are needed, this is just an example*/ LEFT JOIN Table2 T2 ON T1.id=T2.id LEFT JOIN Table3 T3 ON T1.id=T3.id and a query like this SELECT * FROM Table1 T1 LEFT JOIN Table3 T3 ON T1.id=T3.id LEFT JOIN Table2 T2 ON T1.id=T2.id The query plan shows me that it uses 2 Merge Join for both the joins. For the first query, the first merge is with T1 and T2 and then with T3. For the second query, the first merge is with T1 and T3 and then with T2. Both these queries take about the same time(40 seconds approx.) or sometimes Query1 takes couple of seconds longer. So my question is, does the join order matter ?

    Read the article

  • How to make a increasing numbers after filenames in C?

    - by zaplec
    Hi, I have a little problem. I need to do some little operations on quite many files in one little program. So far I have decided to operate them in a single loop where I just change the number after the name. The files are all named TFxx.txt where xx is increasing number from 1 to 80. So how can I open them all in a single loop one after one? I have tried this: for(i=0; i<=80; i++) { char name[8] = "TF"+i+".txt"; FILE = open(name, r); /* Do something */ } As you can see the second line would be working in python but not in C. I have tried to do similiar running numbering with C to this program, but I haven't found out yet how to do that. The format doesn't need to be as it is on the second line, but I'd like to have some advice of how can I solve this problem. All I need to do is just be able to open many files and do same operations to them.

    Read the article

  • How to get the right order for creation of stored procedure, user-defined functions and triggers

    - by PeeWee2201
    I read that object dependencies have been improved in SQL server 2008. I have a rather complex database schema containing stored procedure, user-defined functions, triggers. Can anybody give me a query that would return the right order of creation of those items based on their dependencies ? I read here that there are tools that can do the job, but I am looking for something scriptable. Also, they often give the dependencies of one object and I would like a database-wide solution. Thank you.

    Read the article

  • [iPhone] How to order an array

    - by Fabrizio
    Hi all, I got an array in my app and I need to order by one of its key. Basically what the app does is taking latitude and longitude somewhere, calculate the distance from my actual position and create an array containing a key called "distance". I'm using myArray sortUsingDescriptors: [NSArray arrayWithObject:[[[NSSortDescriptor alloc] initWithKey:@"distance" ascending:YES] autorelease]]]; I'm not sure it's working, I mean the first results are ordered but then it shows distance closer to the previous, as example: 0.8 km 1.6 km 1.9 km 10053.9 km 1098.0 km 2372.0 km 470.5 km Any suggestion? I thank you in advance for any kind of help. Fabrizio

    Read the article

  • how to order a group result with Linq?

    - by Aaron
    How can I order the results from "group ... by... into..." statement in linq? For instance: var queryResult = from records in container.tableWhatever where records.Time >= DateTime.Today group records by tableWhatever.tableHeader.UserId into userRecords select new { UserID = userRecords.Key, Records = userRecords }; The query returns records in table "contain.tableWhatever" grouped by "UserId". I want the returned results within each group ordered by time decending. How can I do that? More specific, assume the above query return only one group like the following: {UserID = 1, Records= {name1 5/3/2010_7:10pm; name2 5/3/2010_8:10pm; name3 5/3/2010_9:10pm} } After insert the orderby statement in the above query, the returned results should be like this: {UserID = 1, Records= {name3 5/3/2010_9:10pm; name2 5/3/2010_8:10pm; name1 5/3/2010_7:10pm} } Thanks for help!

    Read the article

  • jQuery arange li order base on #ID

    - by Mircea
    Hi, I have the following code: <ul> <li id="project_25">Proj Something</li> <li id="project_26">Proj Blah</li> <li id="project_27">Proj Else</li> <li id="project_31">Proj More</li> ... </ul> Is there a way to arrange these LIs, reverse their order, based on the LI ID? Something like: <ul> <li id="project_31">Proj More</li> <li id="project_27">Proj Else</li> <li id="project_26">Proj Blah</li> <li id="project_25">Proj Something</li> ... </ul> Thank you.

    Read the article

  • How can I restore the order of an (incomplete) select list to its original order?

    - by Rob
    I have two Select lists, between which you can move selected options. You can also move options up and down in the right list. When I move options back over to the left list, I would like them to retain their original position in the list order, even if the list is missing some original options. This is solely for the purpose of making the list more convenient for the user. I am currently defining an array with the original Select list onload. What would be the best way to implement this?

    Read the article

  • How can we get unique elements from any ORDER BY DECREASING OR INCREASING

    - by Mohit
    Code given below is taken from the stackoverflow.com !!! Can anyone tell me how to get the array elements order by decreaseing or increasing !! plz help me !!! Thanks in advance $contents = file_get_contents($htmlurl); // Get rid of style, script etc $search = array('@<script[^>]*?>.*?</script>@si', // Strip out javascript '@<head>.*?</head>@siU', // Lose the head section '@<style[^>]*?>.*?</style>@siU', // Strip style tags properly '@<![\s\S]*?--[ \t\n\r]*>@' // Strip multi-line comments including CDATA ); $contents = preg_replace($search, '', $contents); $result = array_count_values( str_word_count( strip_tags($contents), 1 ) ); print_r($result);

    Read the article

  • Multiple Payment options within the same order

    - by Rob Y
    I have a requirement to be able to accept different forms of payment within the same order - ie not just the usual credit card or paypal for the whole thing, but perhaps paypal for one item, cheque for another. I know this sounds quite crazy, but there is a good business reason for the requirement so I can't just push back. The best way I can think of implementing it at the moment is to have kind of a hub page, where you can "launch off" into multiple flows for each of the payments by opening new windows. I can't figure out a way of doing this in a linear flow as for example you can't guarantee that a user will come back from paypal, so you'd then lose the user completely. Is there a neater way of doing this that anyone can think of, or can anyone point me to an example of a site that does somethign similar for inspiration?

    Read the article

  • MySQL: Get unique values across multiple columns in alphabetical order

    - by RuCh
    Hey everyone, If my table looks like this: id | colA | colB | colC =========================== 1 | red | blue | yellow 2 | orange | red | red 3 | orange | blue | cyan What SELECT query do I run such that the results returned are: blue, cyan, orange, red, yellow Basically, I want to extract a collective list of distinct values across multiple columns and return them in alphabetical order. I am not concerned with performance optimization, because the results are being parsed to an XML file that will serve as a cache (database is hardly updated). So even a dirty solution would be fine. Thanks for any help!

    Read the article

  • Ajax JQuery responses order problem....

    - by Parhs
    Hello !!! I am searching 3 hours and didnt find anything.... i have this code which is called at an onChange event of an function group_changed(obj) { $.ajaxSetup({async:false}); $.post("/medilab/personnel/groups/getGroupRightsAjax",{ 'group.id': obj.options[obj.selectedIndex].value }, function(data){ $("#div_rights").html(data); }); } This works fine but if i set async:true sometimes the result doesnt match the selection... I guess that this is happening because some requests are lost or that the responses dont come in order..... Any idea what to do to keep it asynchronous?

    Read the article

  • C#: Changing the order of columns when binding DataTable to a GridView

    - by Nir
    How is it possible to change the displayed order of columns from a DataTable? For example, dataTable "dt" contains two columns "a" and "b". I bind it to a GridView like this: gridView.DataSource = dt; gridView.DataBind(); But I'd like the GridView to display "b" first (leftmost). Important point: I'm using this to export to Excel and there's no actual output to screen, using: HtmlTextWriter htw = new HtmlTextWriter(sw); gridView.RenderControl(htw); Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Problem with Oracle/SQL ORDER BY Statement

    - by ArneRie
    Hi, i have the following content inside an varchar2 column: 10.1.2.3 10.2.3.4 8.3.4.1 8.3.2.1 4.2.1.3 4.3.2.1 9.3.1.2 When i query the database i need an result ordered: 4.... 8.... 9.... 10... the NLS_SORT parameter is set to german, an simple "order by COLUMN DESC/ASC" is not working like excepted. It returns 10..... 8...... 9...... any suggestions?

    Read the article

  • Handling changes in column order when importing CSV files

    - by Scott
    I have a CSV file. The first row will always contain column headers. Depending on a variety of factors, the order of columns may change and, in rare circumstances, some columns may not be present. These changes are beyond my control. My thoughts, so far, on how to address this. I'll read the first row of the file and use the values to generate a list of columns contained in the source file. The destination file will use the same column names as the source. This should be as simple as searching for identical names in the source and destination, then just mapping the column index values, right? What are your recommendations for handling this?

    Read the article

  • Dynamic order by without using dynamic sql ?

    - by Rohit
    I have the following stored procedure which can be sorted ascending and descending on TemplateName,CreatedOn and UploadedBy. The following SP when runs doesnot sort records.if i replace 2,3,4 by columnname, i got an error message "Conversion failed when converting the nvarchar value 'Test Template' to data type int.".Please suggest how to achieve sorting. CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[usp_SEL_GetRenderingTemplate] ( @facilityID INT, @sortOrder VARCHAR(5), @sortExpression VARCHAR(100), @errorCode INT OUTPUT ) AS BEGIN SET NOCOUNT ON ; BEGIN TRY SET @sortOrder = CASE @sortOrder WHEN 'Ascending' THEN 'ASC' WHEN 'Descending' THEN 'DESC' ELSE 'ASC' END SELECT TemplateID, TemplateName, CreatedOn, ( [user].LastName + ' ' + [user].FirstName ) AS UploadedBy FROM Templates INNER JOIN [user] ON [user].UserID = Templates.CreatedBy WHERE facilityid = @facilityID ORDER BY CASE WHEN @sortExpression = 'TemplateName' AND @sortOrder = 'ASC' THEN 2 WHEN @sortExpression = 'CreatedOn' AND @sortOrder = 'ASC' THEN 3 WHEN @sortExpression = 'UploadedBy' AND @sortOrder = 'ASC' THEN 4 END ASC, CASE WHEN @sortExpression = 'TemplateName' AND @sortOrder = 'DESC' THEN 2 WHEN @sortExpression = 'CreatedOn' AND @sortOrder = 'DESC' THEN 3 WHEN @sortExpression = 'UploadedBy' AND @sortOrder = 'DESC' THEN 4 END DESC SET @errorCode = 0 END TRY BEGIN CATCH SET @errorCode = -1 DECLARE @errorMsg AS VARCHAR(MAX) DECLARE @utcDate AS DATETIME SET @errorMsg = CAST(ERROR_MESSAGE() AS VARCHAR(MAX)) SET @utcDate = CAST(GETUTCDATE() AS DATETIME) EXEC usp_INS_LogException 'usp_SEL_GetFacilityWorkTypeList', @errorMsg, @utcDate END CATCH END

    Read the article

  • django - order query set by postgres function

    - by thebiglife
    My initial question was here and was related to the postgres backend. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2408965/postgres-subquery-ordering-by-subquery Now my problem has moved onwards to the Django ORM layer. I essentially want to order a query by a postgres function ('idx', taken from the above stackoverflow work) I've gone through trying to use model.objects.extra(order_by ) or simply order_by but I believe both of these need the order_by parameter to be an attribute or a field known to Django. I'm trying to think how to solve this without having to revert to using an entirely raw SQL query through a model manager.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48  | Next Page >